Added: 2 years ago
From: Swordman85
Views: 38,204
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (138)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Only Churchill's actor doesn't fit

  • You Communist pigs ... We'll be back - Gott Mit Uns!

  • best Hitler, Stalin Churchill and Rosevelt actors i've ever seen

    

  • Best Hitler actor I have ever seen!

  • All the soviets movies of WWII or I mean "Great Patriotic War" begins in june of 1941 and forgot when Hitler and Stalin split Polony for boths and the carnage of kathyn, bloody liers, and Hitler very friendly with the Vatican Nunce for make and anticatholic propaganda...Communist bastards!!!

  • @Alonevoyager

    You lie! I will repeat what I already repeat 2 million times! Hitler and Stalin never shattered Poland. When Hitler invaded Poland, its government fled to Romania, a neutral state, hence, it ceased to exist, because as a neutral state, they could not recognize Polish government. Then, Polish State CEASED to exist, Poland became a contested territory and even the Polish Marshal Rydz-Smigly told his troops to NOT FIGHT the Soviets, even give them their weapons.

  • @Swordman85 They are a lot of documents, fact historics and many History books about that from the 60's, 70's, 80's and works of today about the negotations of Stalin and Hitler for the plans over Polony. What a govermmet ceased to exist doesn't to exist Poland as a Nation, and the official History of the Poland Communist declared of those years untill 1991 the Marshal Rydz-Smigly was a traitor...

  • @Alonevoyager

    Well, traitor or not, he was not the only one. The president Mozickiy tacitaly recognized that Poland had no longer a government.

    It does not matter if there are 1 or 1 thousand books claiming that USSR invaded Poland, what trully matters is that the Marshal of Poland, the interned President Mozickiy and ALL the states aligned with Poland, as well as the League of Nations, never considered USSR as an invading state.

    That ends all the discussions!

  • @Alonevoyager

    There is not even a declaration of war from Poland against USSR, but there is a declaration of war from Poland against Nazi Germany. That puts an end to all discussions.

    The Pact was about influence zones, not about invading Poland, Stalin and Churchill also negociated influence zones after the war, which does not mean that UK invaded Austria(from British influence zone).

  • @Alonevoyager

    Actually, USSR made a favour to millions of people when it recovered the Western Belarus and Ukraine who could meet again their national brothers and be a part of the great Soviet family of nations. If it never recovered such zones, before 1941, millions of people would fall under Nazi dominium. Is that something good for you?

    You speak of Poland as a nation, however such ppl from the East were not even Polish, but Belarusians and Ukrainians.

  • @Alonevoyager

    Claiming that Marshal Smigly was a traitor is simply ridiculous, what about the Foreign Minister Beck, who told Molotov how Poland would like to seize all the Ukraine, join the Axis and invade USSR together with nazi troops? Do these books also tell you that? It's good to remember that Poland helped the nazi to invade Czechoslovakia, taking the region of "Zaolzie". That's something that western propagandists prefer to silence about!

  • @Alonevoyager

    By von Ribbentrop:

    ... 2. I then spoke to M. Beck once more about the policy to be pursued by Poland and Germany towards the Soviet Union and in this connection also spoke about the question of the Greater Ukraine and again proposed Polish-German collaboration in this field.

    M. Beck made no secret of the fact that Poland had aspirations directed toward the Soviet Ukraine and a connection with the Black Sea...

  • @Alonevoyager

    (Original in Akten zur deutschen auswärtigen Politik... Serie D. Bd. V. S. 139-140. English translation in Documents on German Foreign Policy. 1918-1945. Series D. Vol. V. The document in question is No. 126, pp. 167-168; this quotation on p. 168. Also in Russian in God Krizisa T. 1, Doc. No. 120.)

  • @Alonevoyager

    The Polish government internet in Poland did not recognize Soviet troops as invaders, so did the Supreme Commandar of Polish military forces, as well as the League of Nations(they condemned USSR as a invader state in Finland, for instance), as well as France and UK, two countries allied with Poland.

    So, as you can see, there is no "Partition of Poland". That's a modern creation from russophobes and anticommunists.

  • @Swordman85 Can you explainme why the Patriotic war begins in juin of 41 and not in september of 1939. Why Poland was invade for the Nazis and Communist almost the same time. Don't make you familiar the teatry Molotov-Ribbetrop

  • @Alonevoyager

    Because in 1939 Hitler invaded Poland, not USSR. I don't know where are you from, but Poland and USSR were two different states. Poland belonged to Russia until 1917.

    I know the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, it was a non-agression pact. It was not invaded by N. Germany and USSR at the same time, it was invaded firstly by N. Germany, then the Polish state colapsed and USSR retook areas that were removed from Ukraine and Belarus by Germans during the IWW.

  • @Alonevoyager

    There are not international organs that recognized USSR as an agressor country in 1939.

  • @Swordman85 Curiously, the URSS never recognized like Japan the Geneva Convention...!!! That explains why so many crimes who never recognized untill the fall of the communist in 1991...!!!

  • @Alonevoyager

    Vatican and Nazi friendship was never a secret, there are even photos of cardinals and archbishops praising Hitler, doing the nazi salute. This year, even the Pope Benedictus XVI apologized for support to the nazi. Is Benedictus XVI also a communist propagandists?

    Brainless people, unable to think, always have the same excuse: "It's communist propaganda". No, it's not communist propaganda, retard, it's FACTS that can be proofen even with non-communist sources!

  • @Swordman85 Give me a break, everybody knows inside of the Church were a lot of bishops and preasts from the extreme right very anticommunist, they think fascism and Nazism were better to the reds, but at the same time many clergymen again them, they were part of the ressintace, like partisan and helping refugees, but they don't show that of course. After the speach of Christmas 42 of the Pope for the people in persecution (jews) Hitler was furious he wanted to kill the Pope.

    

  • @Alonevoyager

    There are no evidences about it, there are countless examples of colaboration among Nazi and Catholics, specially in the former Iugoslavia, where both persecuted Orthodoxy and favoured local Catholic priests.

    Yes, there were Catholic clerics against nazi, there were(and there are) even Catholic priests for USSR, however, they are usually the lower clergy, not the heads of Roman church.

  • @Alonevoyager

    About Katyn, there are no proofs that Soviets did it, and even if they did, we can make movies about Katyn, after making movies about the 225.000 Polish volunteers who served the German Army and helped to kill 24 millions of Soviets!

  • @Swordman85 Sir you are a big lier!!! After the fall of the Soviet Union the secret files of KGB were revealed and the Russian Government admitted the massacre, with many documents about orders gave for Stalin to Beria. And as you say this is a fake why every year the Polish goverment ahd the Russian government gave an official tribute to the victimes of Katyn.

  • @Alonevoyager

    These files are fake, there are several evidences about that and one deputy from Russian Duma who was investigating it, presenting even fake signatures and denouncing a team of Russian falsifiers, appeared misteriously dead, as it happened to T. Politkovskaya.

    Mythcrackers has an excelent article in English presenting 49 strong evidences that the "opened documents" are false. The archives were opened in 91, but curiously, the ones on Katyn, just last year.

  • @Alonevoyager

    Read the text entitled "Katyn: 49 signs of falsification of “Closed package no. 1". Easy to find at Google. There is also a good video about that: watch?v=jRJzkIAKarQ

    Impressed? Nothing new here. Since 1985 the former USSR and Russia are governed by corrupt politicians and anti-Russian elements. Their government ruined the country and empoverished the people. To boost some international prestige, they offer the West all sorts of anti-Soviet propaganda.

  • @Swordman85 If you don't beleave me or many Historian with real documents and testimonies from people who lived aand saw those things, i don't know what reallity you live, but if you really want to know the true about your beloved Stalin read books of Valentin Gonzales "el campesino" Life and dead in the USSR, Ettore Vani Me Communist in USSR, Rafael Millares Bravo and many others who belevied to went to the paradise comminst and only found the HELL

  • @Alonevoyager

    Again on Catholic Church and the nazi:

    watch?v=KD_lBstvptE

    watch?v=XOQL8sD7Ba0

    It's good to remember that Hitler and Himmler, ardent Catholics(as most of Waffen SS members) were never excomungated by the Pope.

  • @Swordman85 Hitler, Goebles and Himmler were catholics, but really bad catholics, they joined to ocultist groups like Thule and Vril Societies, specially Himmler, fanatic of those things, he tried to created a Germanic Religion with the pagan tradition, and in the begins the nazi propaganda was again the Catholics if you forgot that.What about the Castle of Bebelsburg the "Vatican of the Nazis". many priest were sended to concentration camps.

  • @Swordman85 Hitler, Goebles and Himmler were catholics, but really bad catholics, they joined to ocultist groups like Thule and Vril Societies, specially Himmler, fanatic of those things, he tried to created a Germanic Religion with the pagan tradition, and in the begins the nazi propaganda was again the Catholics if you forgot that.What about the Castle of Bebelsburg the "Vatican of the Nazis". many priest were sended to concentration camps.

  • @Alonevoyager

    Btw, the following video brings at 3:04 the real character shown at 0:52(Cardinal Arsenigo) at Padenie Berlina:

    watch?v=sEATQF5lCYo

  • Commie propaganda.

  • propaganda, blah b;ah blah - stupid movie for stupid men.

  • @Tm123P

    Not really, it's a very historically acurate movie, except for people who know nothing about history.

  • @Swordman85 .i m historician ;)

  • @Tm123P

    So is Robert Conquest, who was unmasked by several serious historians, including the Professor Grover Furr. You clearly did not pay enough attention to Historiography classes and clearly ignore several sources to benefit your own.

    If you are a historian, then you clearly lack of ethics.

  • @Swordman85 Lack of ethics? So, do not tolerate the falsification of history. Soviet Army is occupying many countries. Criminals never been tried before the tribunal. Worse than Hitler.

  • @Tm123P

    Nobody is falsifying history here, nor me, nor the film. What this film shows can be confirmed from different bibliographic sources. Soviet Army freeded many countries. Worse than Hitler? Not really. Hitler was a racist who wished the destruction of all the "lesser races". Soviet Army followed communist principles, the same who claim the freedom for the working class. It's good to remember that USSR was the first country to punish racism, how can such state be worse than Hitler?

  • @Swordman85 Yep, USSR was also the first country ruined to the ground by affirmative action and back racism. Look at former Southern USSR, learn Stans and Chechnya. Coming to a city praising devercity near you. Detroit, MI is a good example.

  • @Tm123P

    When Hitler left German power, Germany was a ruined country, worse than before Hitler. When Stalin left Soviet power, USSR was a really advanced country, even names like Churchill recognized this. Actually, even the American Army knows about the heroic deeds of communist soldiers. That's something you can't deny, that's something expressed at the beggining of "The battle of Russia".

    So you are not a historian, you are just another farse.

  • @Tm123P

    "...the scale and grandeur of the (Russian) effort mark it as the greatest military achievement in all history" General Douglas MacArthur, Commander in Chief, Southwest Pacific Area

    I think that the only "worse than Hitler" here is you, who try to fool people with lies and justify a speech of hatress and prejudice against the army that destroyed 75% of Nazi forces and freeded several countries from fascist slavery.

  • @Swordman85

    omg!.. facist???? This nazi no facist! Facist (1922-1943/45) in Italy! Nazi - 4/6 years occupation. Communism ocupations Eastern Europe 1945-1991!!!

    Omg...

  • guy at 6-27 looks like Boby from Twin Peaks:D

  • 4-06 - Please don't shoot im american!!! - coward

    3-51 - (Girl) Griends!!! We will not wait for death! Forward to fight them! - bold

  • @PolanskyA

    This part makes sense. If you ask survivors from the concentration camps, they claim that Americans and Britishes had a much better treatment. Even Holywood recognizes it as movies like "The war of Haart", the Americans can even organize a trial and judge their own men, while Soviets are hanged.

  • 2-37 - Battle colleague and friend. Not a bessarabian friend. And yes Cherchill looks very realistic.

  • @Kamensky93 yea great work !!!

  • Wow, that Hitler is a spitting image of the original. Even in the nose!

  • PATETICH..............

  • How did they found the actors :D

  • Wow, I didn't know hitler was able to speak perfect russian.

  • @Scherenmann

    Hitler speaks Russian just among his fellow Germans, making it clear that he is talking in German. But the movie is Russian and its audio is in Russian to make it easier to understand.

  • @Scherenmann Hitler and other non English speakers always speak perfect english in American movies. I prefer subtitles over dubbing personally but if you have an American actor playing as a German, they aren't going to speak German very convincingly.

  • Ok, let's get real here people. We all know Germany started the War against Russia, but the only reason America and Russia didn't destroy Germany completely was because the wanted it to be a frontline country... Hence the Berlin Wall? Start of the Cold War?

  • Пафосно слишком, но такой фильм был нужен в свое время. как же мне жалко всех погибших на войне. абсолютно всех.

  • Gulag Archipelago <<< full of bullshit

  • Many of you should go and study what transpired in the Soviet Union prior to the nazi invasion. Stalin is directly responsible that the Soviet Union lost over 27 million Soviet persons during the war but..... BUT it was also only because of Stalin that the Soviet Union emerged victorious. Without Stalin the likelihood of the Soviet Union surviving the nazi onslaught is VERY improbable.

    A major paradox.

    Stalin - evil but probably why Soviet Union survived.

  • @lukebccb You might say "A necassary evil"?

  • @lukebccb

    Actually 750,000 went. 96% were REAL criminals, so try sources that aren't US-based Wikipedia.

    But, and Read on, STALIN BETRAYED RUSSIA. Notice in the anthem "party of lenin" is not sung, and it is badly re-organised to sing "Stalin"

  • @WolfytheWolf5667

    Actually, he is claiming that the victims of the Nazi in WWII were victims of Stalin. He is not talking about the people arrested in 30's.

    His post is nonsense. It makes no sense to claim that Stalin was responsible for the invasion of the USSR, because he prepared the country to fight the nazi. Hitler considered the Soviets as a "lesser people" who had to be wiped out from the face of Eath.

  • @lukebccb Excellent point. His ruthlesness was a match for the ruthlessness of his Nazi opponent. Arguably the war was lost for Hitler on the East front because he made several tactical mistakes including stretching his troops too far in the Winter of 41 - there is some merit to the idea that Hitler lost the war, it was not the allies who won it.

  • @lukebccb we all do bad and good things. Stalin caused the purge in the 30's, but led the soviets to the victory in WWII. thats why he is both a hero and a villan

  • @MultiMinigun

    He made the purges, because otherwise he would suffer what Salvador Alliende suffered in Chile during the 70's in 09/11.

  • @lukebccb Superficially, you are correct. There is however an additional critical factor in Stalin's "victory" and that is the contribution of British traitors who fed the Soviets with intercepted German intelligence communiques. Kim Philby and Victor Rothschild were passing on vital Enigma intelligence to Stalin (even before Churchill was given it) that allowed the Soviets to prepare for and counter the German attacks. Hitler would have overrun the Soviets otherwise.

  • The nazis didn't fear the oncoming Red Army cause they actually believed that nazi crap about the Slavic "untermenschen" but rather the nazis *KNEW* the war crimes they had committed in the Soviet Union *WERE WAR CRIMES* and the nazis KNEW the Red Army was coming to Deutschland with payback.........

  • Hahaha, the marriege of hitler looks so comical!! :D

  • The entire war was tragic. After a while, it ceases to matter where the dead come from; only that they died is important.

  • Ha ha, the japanese speak like a child!

  • The Battle of Berlin was such a terrible battle. So many innocent were raped and killed by the Soviets, but it was bound to happen. I am no Nazi, Soviet, or Allied fan, but the fall of Berlin was hideous to all for the things that took place during that battle.

  • @Hyperguy11

    Oh, sure... 20 millions of Soviets were slaughtered and now the Battle of Berlin was cruel. All these rapes are fake, until we see the proofs.

    Even if they are real, much more Soviet women were raped and mudered by the nazi. Nothing will erase the heroic deeds of Soviet people, regardless of your atempts of rewritting or revise history.

  • @Swordman85 Please note that I'm not arguing with you. I'm agreeing with you to a certain point. It was true that rape and civilian death did occur during this battle as the same happened in Stalingrad and other Russian cities. I see the Battle of Stalingrad in the same way I see the Battle of Berlin. The deaths of the civilians in both those battles are horrible, but are a part of war.

    Also note that I'm not 'rewritting history'. I just mourn for those who died during the battle is all.

  • @Swordman85 Amen I am with you and todays rude, inbred Nazi Germans have no idea of the cruelty and the sadistic nature of German soldiers murdering Russian men, women and children. Todays Germans do not want to know their Grandparents murdered 26 million Russians in the most evil sadistic inhumane ways. Todays Germans do not relaize that realize or chomphrehend the Hitler was murder every Russian and have German Settlers take over their land and resources.

  • @Swordman85 let me guess your saying no girl was raped by the soviets? that is complete BULLSHIT my great aunt was in berlin at the time shes german and she was raped by a soviet private every countries army in world war 2 atleast raped someone in some country the germans raped the soviets raped americans raped EVERONE DID you sir a just a stupid dumb fuck.

  • @WhiteandNerdy44

    Blame Hitler and the nazi them, THEY started the Barbarrossa Operation, not the Soviets. If the Soviets had to retaliate at least 1/3 of all the evil that the nazi did to them, responsible for more than 24 millions of deaths in Soviet territory and about 1/3 of Polish population, there would not be a single German city standing in Germany.

    But the Soviets were generous to the Germans, differently to what Anglo-Americans did(remember Dresden).

  • @Swordman85 The bombing of Dresden was at the request of the Red Army. Soviet troops were notorious for going into German towns and raping as many women as they could find. There weren't at all generous to the Germans.

  • @WhiteandNerdy44

    And learn to be civilized! Just because you don't agree with me, it does not grant the name of insulting me. I bet you are hardly older than 10 years old, be it phisically or mentally!

  • @Swordman85 I am so tired of seeing people like you on the internet *sigh* just more and more come these days.

  • @Hyperguy11

    What about 70,000 USSR towns and villages destroyed? What about Stalingrad, Leningrad destroyed? What about millions of civilians murdered? What about 25 million war dead?

  • @llucan01 ok so you haven't read the second comment I posted below. I AGREE with the fact that it happened in Russia. Ok? But my original comment was about the NONE soldiers in Russia and Germany that where killed, but at the same time I realize that it's a part of war and it was bound to happen. So please read my original comment as, again, I'm no Nazi I just hate to see civilians killed.

  • @Hyperguy11

    Everyone seems to be so biased here and you just condemned rape and violence towards civilians in a war. Be it from soviets, nazis, etc.

  • @Hyperguy11 Какая ж ты сволочь. Только и можно, что удиляться. 

  • @Hyperguy11 The German people chose their fate.

  • Scene at 02:32 global change of world order. British Empire collapses

  • Any place I can find an english version of this movie?

  • @t72pwner you can only get it with english subs

  • @TvdHeuvel87

    Spanish are available too.

  • @TvdHeuvel87 That's cool, any idea where I can get my hands on a copy(with the subs)?

  • I was honored to see this movie 

  • @TheTomdor: you have low expectations. LOL.

  • @DieRotTotenkopf

    What's the problem of being a Stalin fan? Stalin signed the first document of Mankind History to condemn the racism and the discrimination. Your master, however, this is, Adolf Hitler, instituted the most nasty and dirty racist power of Mankind history, the Nazi Germany.

    I use concrete books and statistics read in more than 12 years of study. Come back to your PC to self masturbate for your nazi heroes, your pervert! Degenerated! You deserve jail only!

  • @Swordman85: Hmmm, lets see...maybe because your Uncle Joe was the greatest mass murderer of all time, next to Mao and Pol Pothead. You commies are a fun group. Your god, Stalin is the champ of all cold blooded killers this side of Tony Soprano. Stalin was the king of criminals and you are his pissboy. Good choice of heros, commieboy.

  • @eric5906

    "Diccere et non probare est non diccere" Romans correctly stated thousand years ago. You are so smart man, do you want a banana? Because seriously, even a chimpanzé can write that if we properly train him. Champion of all blood drinkers? Don't make us left. Where are your statistics? Sources? Do you have any document which proofs that? Obviously not, which means that you are either a dumb repeater, like a parrot or monkey, or just another crypto-neonazi.

  • What kind of propaganda??the germans abandoned their camps and left, what is thesed fights?

  • This was a damn good movie. Best impression of Hitler and Stalin I have ever seen.

  • man, Eva Braun loked liked a zombie,

  • A thought: Did the makers of this movie study Reffenstahl's Triumph of the Will? The scene of Stalin triumphantly landing by plane in Berlin suggests the opening scene of that movie, where Hitler arrives by plane in Nuremburg. The connotation of triumph over the land is the same, so is the idolatrous crowd. seeing POWs from the camps is absurd. The Soviets actually kept all POWs in the camps & transported many back to their own camps.

  • Really, where are your proofs? Even Holywood, specialist in anti-communist movies, does not dare to defend such monstruosity. Movies like "Jacob the liar", with Robin Williams, show exatly the same as in this movie, as well as movies like Schindler´s List. Needless to say that Spilberg and R. Williams are not communists.

    The Soviets actually freeded lots of prisoners in WWII.

  • @Swordman85: I will only comment that it is fitting that you look to a movie like Jacob the LIAR as confirmation for your beloved leftist mythologising.

  • Haha, oh, sure. If I mentioned an anticommunist movie made in Hollywood it would be a "scientific proof", as most of Right-wing extremists often do.

    That's the problem of Western reactionaries, they are like robots whose god is TV, money and sex.

    Disappointing!

  • @Swordman85: What kind of mentallity do you have that you imagine a movie is proof of anything? If you can find a Hollywood anti-communist movie it would be a miracle. Leftists & communists in particular have long had a policy of infiltrating Western institutions, especially the "commanding heigts" of communications. It takes an active act of the will for a mind to push away the leftist rot that a leftist dominated elite foists on our civilization.

  • Where did I say it? Learn to interpret texts! Movies are not proof of anything, but epic movies are used to be based uppon real facts, they are used to be researched in some cases. If you read the Soviet version of history, as well as non-propagandist authors in the West, you will reach such conclusion.

    Leftist conspiracy? Man, you need urgently read some books of Voltaire, Rosseau, Hegel...

    If a person uses his brains, it does not means that it's necessarely a leftist.

  • @Swordman85: Western "non-propagandists?" Like your beloved Parenti, who is an apologist for Mao & his geneocidal war against the Tibetans? & you are the one who brought up the issue of movies proving anything. How does the "epical" nature of a movie make any more fact based? Is Hitler a great man b/c of the epic "Triumph of the Will?" A conservatve mind must actively strive to push away the leftist fog that pervades our culture. Who is the mindless robot spouting propaganda inputs?

  • Hahahaha, tell me a single book of Parenti where he does apology of Mao? For you any people who does not repeat blindly anticommunist propaganda like a programmed robot is an apologist of communism, I know exactly how people like you think.

    I recomend you a very good book which describes exactly fanatics like you: "Anti-communist impulse", go read it and then we shall have a rational debate.

  • @Swordman85: No doubt reading anything that isn't a fog assinine leftist propaganda is difficult for you. You don't need to read any books. There is a video right here on Youtube. Just do a search on Tibet like I did & you to can learn from the master's own lips how when Mao wiped a couple million Tibetans & supplanted them in their own nation it was actually a good deal for the Tibetans. When commies take over a country they invariably kill off a few million people, cracked eggs for the omelet.

  • Only communists? How naive you are... Every revolution kill lots of people, do you sincerelly believe that French Revolution, which left us a libertarian legacy, was made with people talking in a dinner? With people saying "please, leave the power" and switching the chairs? Capitalism itself slayed entire populations in Americas, Africa and we still have the same social problems. You need to grow up!

    The video on Tibet is not a defense of Mao, it's the condemnation of a feudal model.

  • @Swordman85: It is a defense of the replacement of that feudal system by Mao. Obviously, you are one of those letist automitons who have been conditioned by our corrupt media & education system to react in the automatic & proper manner to magic scare words like "FEUDAL." Parenti is one of those many disgusting Western treasonous apologists for foreign tyrannies, so long as they call themselves Peoples Republic of Thus-and-sucn." What a tool you are.

  • The only thing that media spreads is the apology of capitalism and imperialism, CNN and the main mass media are the proof of that. As Marx once said, "the ideas that prevail in an epoch are the ideas of rulling class", the burgueoise in this case.

    Feudalism is an obsolete model, a step back in history, the man evolutes, he does not regret. Slavery, feudalism, capitalism, socialism and communism, that's the natural sequence. Parenti is an intellectual with brains, not a CIA sponsored one.

  • @Swordman85: Socialism is slavery, there is no purposeful sequence to history, just the same old human passions playing themselves out again & again. Socialism brought the world the most degrading slavery humanity has ever known. Read the GULAG Archepelago to find out about it. The Czars ended slavery in the 19th cent. & Lenin brought it back in the 20th. The Czars freed the serfs & they began buying their own lands. Stalin stole those lands back like a red czar.

  • Gulag Archipelago is written by a man who was IMPRISONED in a Gulag, it's the same thing if you ask someone in a US, UK or Chinese prison if he thinks that this system is joust. Btw, the same author of this book defends nazi, condemning them only for not using the vlassovite properly.

    Capitalism, that's slavery, where capitalists are always doing everything possible to step on the Labor Laws, I'm a lawyer and I know what I'm talking about.

  • @Swordman85: Solzhenitsyn was enslaved in Siberia for making a denigrating joke about Stalin a private letter to a friend. No one in the U.S. or U.K. is imprisoned for making private jokes. Why don'cha just read what Alexander has to say about the Volga Canal project. The GULAG system was the world's largest system of slave labor. The Nazis copied it w/ their concentration camp system. I just want you to remember, Lenin invented it.

    I am sure you are lawyer, & a real competant one.

  • That's what Western press told you, which does not match with real facts. He was imprisoned for making apologies to nazi, as he does in Archipelago Gulag, if you actually readed the book, as he defends two rapists who were imprisoned in Germany for raping a German woman, non-combatant.

    If you even know the actual meaning of "Gulag", you should know that every country has it's own, it's a constant in Criminal Procedure that labor is seen as an effective way to re-socialize a prisoner.

  • @Swordman85: I have read the GULAG Archepelago. It is one of if not the greatest book of the 20th cent. & one can only appreciate Solzhenitsyn by ignoring the Western press. Talking to you is like talking to a Holocaust denier. There is no detering you from your worship of the one on Earth who began WWII as Adolph Hitler's ally against an innocent & helpless Poland. The Holocaust began in Poland Auschvitz was in Poland. This couldn't have happened w/o Stalin's connivance. Stalin = Hitler

  • It's funny to see you speaking of Holocaust, Victor, because Solzhenytsin himself supported this holocaust, he never condemned nazi for being nazi, but for their lack of regard for Vlassovite gangs.

    On your Auschwitz comment, we have a clear fallacy called "affirming the consequent", and, at the same time, a clear argumentum ad ignorantiam.

    The greatest holocaust, however, was the slaughtering of 60 million of people in WWII by Nazi, a blood bath stopped by Stalin troops in Berlin!

  • @Swordman85 In the WW1 you did not have any cossacks or other russian minorities helping the germans...why then in WWII. Stalin did not care for millions of dead..it did not bother him.

  • In time:

    The same Solzhenytsin who, before ABC news, supported the colonialist policy of Spain and Portugal, inviting USA to invade Portugal during the Revolução dos cravos. Ironically, this man won the Nobel Prize of Peace...

  • @Swordman85: Now you are being quite silly. Why would Solzhenytsin care about Portugal?

    As for the Holocaust, Stalin knew what Hitler's plans were for Poland. He helped Hitler invade Poland. Stalin butchered the Polish officers in the Katyn Forrest, so they were both peas in the same pod. Stalin was planning a Holocaust of his own w/ his beginning the propaganda of his so-called Doctor's Plot as a pretext for a new Jew focused purge.

  • He would care about Portugal because of the Carnation Revolution, a republican revolution against Salazar, who was a supporter of Hitler in WWII. In Solzhenytsin's mind, it was a communist revolution, as in the mind of an inquisitor an atheist is a warlock.

    Hitler invaded Poland and, as the government collapsed, USSR retook areas with predominant Belarusian and Ukrainian population, since Poland HAD NO GOVERNMENT. Stop repeating clichés.

  • There are evidences of this plot, remember that USSR created the first "Israel", the Autonomous Republic of Birobodzhan, where not a single muslim would harm them, however they insisted in Israel crap, which USSR also supported, once created, they simply turned their back to Soviets and embraced USA, as they do till nowadays.

    For that reason police started to investigate zionism in USSR, and zionism =/= Jew.

    The Soviet Jews are not even semitic, but Turkish, from the Khazars.

  • @VictorLepanto Polish officers in the Katyn forest was killed by Germanes

  • @AndrewPowergo : check your history dude and it's "Germans."

  • @eric5906

    What history? Ever heard of something called "historiography"? It's funny when such ppl come here thinking that history is a science like mathematics or physics, exact sciences...

    Needless to say that even the "exact" science of physic had its foundations revolutioned by a young boy called Albert Einstein in XX century.

  • @AndrewPowergo total crap the russians killed them iv see stalins order. read you moron.

  • @bufsoftley Maybe this Stalin's orders is crap didn't think so?

  • @bufsoftley

    Ilyuhin, member of Russian Duma, already proofed that all these orders, as well as the fake resignation chart of Nikolay II, are fake documents.

    Capitalist governments often lie for political and profit purporses.

  • If Parenti was an apologist of tyrannies he would support US regime, do you want a greater tyranny than a country where people are basically allowed to have only one kind of thinking? Where ppl can chose basically 2 candidates whose differences are basically physical? Where 2 millions of people live in the streets? Where people who do not support the bloody genocides of it's government are portraited as "treasonous"?

    USA, aside Nazi Germany, is the most perfect killing machine ever made.

  • It is a supreme demonstration of both stupidity & ignorance that one would actually take this filthy movie seriously. The image of Stalin arriving in Berlin by plane is utterly laughable. Stalin was affraid of flying, no doubt he feared sabotage. & the image of the Red Army heroically liberating the concentration camps & the Soviet prisoners rejoicing at this prospect is so absolutely, perfectly, supremely disgusting. The mind boggles. Stalin treated POWs as traitors.

  • agree with you

    nevertheless this movie is not to be taken seriously

    stalin loved this movies

    loved the director and the actor that played STALIN

    the movies where not supposed to be historically aquarate

    they were supposed to show A DIFFERENT KIND OF stalinism, a kind, tolerant, intelligent and god-like stalin

    these movies were for the people of the far regions of the USSR, people who didnt know anything about the real stalinism

    its just propaganda showing a nice stalin

  • Hahaha, you Westerns are so funny. Western people look like robots, who know only how to repeat. For you there is only "black" and "white", there is not "gray", "red", "blue", "green"... You watch one of History version at TV and immediatly think that it's an absolute truth, right like Catholics in Middle Ages.

    I am sorry to inform you, but even today, after so much anti-communist propaganda, Stalin is among the 3 greatest names of Russia.

  • besides, stalin never visited berlin

    you must see how aquarate *i know is not spelled right*

    the actors personofy their historical counter parts

    this was one of the few SOVIET BIG BUDGET SUPER PRODUCTIONS

  • That's false, it's a historical fact that Stalin actually visited Berlin, however, not by plane, but by train.

  • The only show of stupidity & ignorance is to take your history version seriously. Firstly, because you look like a "pope" or Catholic inquisitor defending "absolute and imutable truth", your truth is clearly that "Soviets were demons" and "US is the saviour of humanity", despite that this country killed more than nazi during it's history, killings Indians, Mexicans, Iraqis, Phillipinos... That can be confirmed in the books of M. Parenti, US intelectual.

    Btw, what are your sources? TV?

  • @Swordman85: Well, w/ an objective 'scholar" like Parenti as your source for your "information." How can I dare to question you.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more