Its been six months now since I asked, Can anyone provide even a single article from a serious journal or a paper from a juried conference that documents a link between the use of MI in school and improved performance?
No one has provided even ONE of these.
I dont intend this as a criticism of those who discuss MI (thats important); rather, its an accurate picture of the lack of valid support for MI.
Can anyone provide even a single article from a serious journal or a juried conference paper that documents a link between the use of MI in school and improved performance? Im talking about observations of real school children & tasks.
Self-proclaimed educational consultants (mainly uninformed school-hustling, pedagogy pimps) take thousands of dollars from schools and claim that MI can help schools and children and offer no support for this claim. Can anyone cite ANY VALID evidence?
Saying there's no evidence for multiple intelligences is like saying that everyone thinks the same way... In reality, there are some brilliant mathematicians who couldn't write the first page of a novel, as well as some brilliant public speakers who couldn't understand the fundamentals of a grade school science project. The public school system just isn't designed to hone special abilities of its students. It's all about the GPA, which is kind of a stupid system in my opinion.
Three things: First, youre right, people have different abilities, but note that every good traditional IQ test (a) contain both verbal and a non-verbal tests, and (b) provide very strong support for Spearmans theory of general (not multiple) intelligence. Second, your observation could be supported by either Sternbergs or Cattells theories of intelligence. Both of these have strong scientific support. Third, if you believe there is sound, scientific evidence for Gardner, where is it?
Hmm.. good points. I looked up those other guys and they had way more to say about intelligence. Very interesting stuff. Then I looked up Gardner, and you're right, there is not enough data/evidence to support his theory. There is a definite lack of empirical evidence.
loira muito gostosa
bochoba 1 year ago
It really helps to introduce of MI application in real life.
MrsJuniriang 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Its been six months now since I asked, Can anyone provide even a single article from a serious journal or a paper from a juried conference that documents a link between the use of MI in school and improved performance?
No one has provided even ONE of these.
I dont intend this as a criticism of those who discuss MI (thats important); rather, its an accurate picture of the lack of valid support for MI.
chrismca 2 years ago
If you simplify it. what it says is 'some people are good at somethings and some at other things'. But obviously!!!
Because of all the silly need to provide facts to prove a theory "logical", academics cannot believe where it is not proved.
SplineTol 2 years ago
Can anyone provide even a single article from a serious journal or a juried conference paper that documents a link between the use of MI in school and improved performance? Im talking about observations of real school children & tasks.
Self-proclaimed educational consultants (mainly uninformed school-hustling, pedagogy pimps) take thousands of dollars from schools and claim that MI can help schools and children and offer no support for this claim. Can anyone cite ANY VALID evidence?
chrismca 2 years ago
Saying there's no evidence for multiple intelligences is like saying that everyone thinks the same way... In reality, there are some brilliant mathematicians who couldn't write the first page of a novel, as well as some brilliant public speakers who couldn't understand the fundamentals of a grade school science project. The public school system just isn't designed to hone special abilities of its students. It's all about the GPA, which is kind of a stupid system in my opinion.
seanotube85 2 years ago
Three things: First, youre right, people have different abilities, but note that every good traditional IQ test (a) contain both verbal and a non-verbal tests, and (b) provide very strong support for Spearmans theory of general (not multiple) intelligence. Second, your observation could be supported by either Sternbergs or Cattells theories of intelligence. Both of these have strong scientific support. Third, if you believe there is sound, scientific evidence for Gardner, where is it?
chrismca 2 years ago
Hmm.. good points. I looked up those other guys and they had way more to say about intelligence. Very interesting stuff. Then I looked up Gardner, and you're right, there is not enough data/evidence to support his theory. There is a definite lack of empirical evidence.
seanotube85 2 years ago
lol.....
Nades129 2 years ago
wow..go us!!! the editing rocks thanks adam!!
gigemags5000 4 years ago
excellent, great cinematography and editing.
greetings and props from Houston!
nethead026 4 years ago
Totally awesome! :)
ailiechang 4 years ago