Added: 3 years ago
From: CNN911Fakes
Views: 2,167
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (33)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • l cant work out if this is a clever misinformation campaign or just a dumb cunt with a Disney font.

  • @NeedleFactoryTube Don't trouble your limited mental facilities. If you are too dumb to realize that an object cannopt have gone through a place where there is no hole, you are too dumb.

  • @CNN911Fakes l think you answered my question right there, for all to see.

  • @NeedleFactoryTube Indeed.

  • Has everyone missed the point?

    The columns are intact. The wings and stabiizer did not go through but neither did they fall off. So where did they go?

  • Never heard of inertia, have you darling?

  • OMG the fonts...

  • Geniuses, there are so many things wrong with your postings I won't go into detail, suffice it to say that I know the person in the foreground personally, he worked in a downtown bank that day and he does not dispute this video. The only person that would benefit from faking this video is Evan Fairbanks for 15 min of fame, why do you think the govt would need to fake it? Tens of thousands of downtown workers saw that plane go into the tower

  • @Oregoneli You don't know how many witnesses there were...you're just basing that on what you heard on TV. How many blocks are south of the WTC? Who would have been there? why am I trying to explain this to you when you're probably posting on behalf of the perps or are one of them??

  • didnt give us much time to read it. kept havin to pause. and the font is so anoying, why are all the vids i wana see from you? sort it out man.

  • *****5

    Well done!

  • Impossible plane reaction

    and

    who ever the guy is sitting there must be stone deaf

    a roaring jet hitting a building and he never moves

    fake,fake,fake

  • BaNoyes

    Indeed, indeed, indeed!

  • Gulp! Swallowed it right up. Steel and concrete fail!

    I sure want a car made out of that magic aluminimummer stuff we see here. ;-)

  • Two things. 1. The windshield of the vehicle in the foreground could not possibly reflect the towers behind it(which it does in the video). It would reflect what is just in front of it and slightly above it. This is obviously a paste job. 2.The man's reaction time was obviously fake and mis-timed. clearly taped before the event and then CGI'd on the day.

  • for one, videos done horribly like this only dilute the real good information out there. two, its ESPECIALLY, not expecially. and three, your undoctored photo shows concrete columns broken inward suggesting something slamming into the building and not a bomb exploding outward.

  • reaton33,

    The video concerns the lies, not the truth.

    The NIST images prove the 911 videos were lies.

    There were no concrete columns bent inward at wtc.

    I am not surprised by your opinion.

  • pause at 2:55, I can clearly see sections of the building pointing inward. if the explosion came OUTWARD, wouldnt everything be pointing that way to suggest an outward blast? i apologize for sounding so negative and appreciate the reply you gave.

  • reaton33,

    You're lookin' better!

    Shaped charges create whatever shape the artist wants them to. A competent guy could do Rodin in 1 half second (the final part!).

    We also have no idea what part of which photos were altered. We do know that every photo (at least among the over 10,000 I have personally examined) was at least altered if not totally invented.

    ps, there was no concrete in the outer WTC twin skin. The floors were 4 inch high, 220 feet thick concrete walls/knives.

  • Actually we do have an idea Ann Gables of webfairy alread stated her group altered stills so If you get stuff from Alex Jones it is altered footage it has been cropped compressed and edited.

  • Really when most of the concrete was in the floors and sub basement. Hemm a littl bit of knowing the archetecture and structure of the buildings help

  • who is joe crain exactly?

    why a martyr?

    was he killed?

  • nokilt1

    Please read the sidebar of my latest video for a little more background.

    No, he is not dead, just to YouTube

  • Very correct. That mixed with his coverup of the truuth is pathetic. He deleats anything that threates his fantasy and yes ther were steel collums bent inwards in both WTC towers so there goes lies again.

  • one thing i think i'm seeing in this vid is the wings look like they're hitting the facade of the building; then it appears that the wings may be folding back as the plane penetrates. as for reports and he said/she said, i don't know. just saying what i observed.

  • cyrilborg

    Thanks for commenting.

    Pls point out where it looks like the wings are folding back in this video.

    After you do that, pls tell us how that could happen.

  • aluminum can bend. Concrete and Steel VS Aluminum probably will mean aluminum loses. The wings have some degree of flexibility and will eventually bend if put under massive stress such as (essentially) hitting a brick wall.

    Look at the moment where the plane is about 75% of the way into the building - it looks like the right wing is folded back about 60 degrees from its normal position.

  • Is that why, when comparing aluminum to steel, aluminum is described as brittle?

    Do you know why they used to connect the wing to the fuselage using a hinge?

    There is no point in this video where the wings look folded back.

  • sure, aluminum is brittle compared to steel. but it still can bend, it's not like glass. I have personally used aircraft aluminum (friend worked at a hangar) and although it's brittle; it still is fairly flexible and can bend a bit before failing. We could argue all day; but it seems to me you only want replies that reinforce your point of view. I respectfully disagree.

    Try looking for other videos of planes hitting concrete walls, you will see bending of aluminum airframe components.

  • I have just deleted 2 more of carnivoreeschelon's statements.

    He keeps repeating his lie that the NIST image is faked. Figure 2-27 for anybody wishing to see it themselves.

  • I have deleted 3 of carnivoreeschelon's empty comments claiming that I have violated coyright law and that I have altered an image.

    The image is easily found in the NIST report as shown in the video. It is unaltered.

    Figure 2-27

  • Joe Craine said, "Our fight for the most part has been ineffective in bringing to light our positions. These tributes to me are greatly appreciated but do nothing to help our cause. We need to look at ourselves and our message and regroup." Good luck. HAHAHAHA. Your message will never be effective, because it is so completely IDIOTIC!! I hope more people do see your stupid tripe then more will know the lunatic mindset of you CTers and your "cause" will go down the toilet! Just like Joe's account

  • Your research is as poor as your ability to stay on subject.

    That quote is not from Joe Craine. It is from JoeCraine001. A fine supporter of Joe Craine, but not the martyr hisself!

    You get one 'by;' next message, stick reasonably close to the subject of the video.

  • absolutly correct anyone with simple critical thinking and the NIST final report can easily do so. He switched the WTC1 graphic for wtc2 and left the caption for wtc2 when it was not the graphic that went with it.

  • Wow, same lie.

    Any fool can look it up. Try looking it up.

  • Interesting...Do you know if there are any photos of sketches of a plane against the holes at the Towers like I have seen of the Pentagon? It would be easier to tell (for me anyway, I am an amature!) and I am sure quite interesting to compare.

  • Please stop the video at v1:37. That is from the NIST (or FEMA) report.

  • I know there is sketch on that video, but is there an actual one like that of the sketch of the plane up against the hole in the Pentagon? I suppose I should have made my self more clear, eh?

  • Joe is not aware of any and I know less than he does.

    The best animation of a plane hitting the south tower is the CNN ghost plane video widely available on YouTube and other places.

    But, it doesn't show a hole until after they are done with the plane animation.

  • Also the actual hole isto the left in the pilots for truth version. they changed the angle.

  • Yes that is wtc 1 and you are in violation of the TOS copyright use of the NIST materal. It is not wtc 2 as you misrepresent it to be. Learn the diffrence between wtc 1 and 2 box of rocks

  • I am well within US copyright law.

    You figure the caption at the bottom of the image, included in the video and readable in the image, even in low res, that says

    "Figure 2-27"

    and

    "south face of wtc 2"

    is a mistake?

  • I have nuberous ons from FAA and the fact is he shows the wrong angle and too high. The stills i have from the AP taken fromngton avenue show that there were photos taken from the citgo that are utilized that are not showing the main hol but the hole left by the right engin.

  • Is it possible for you to actually watch a video you comment on?

    This is WTC. No citgo issue here.

  • yes they are in the wtc report and they match not like the images cnn switched and left the comments onthe bottom a quick snip and clip an wtc 2 becomes wtc1

  • carnivoreeschelon,

    show us the original. I have quoted, footnote style, the exact location of the image so any fool can look it up.

    Look it up!

  • What does Joe mean by "Only one person...."?!?!?

  • Thanks for paying attention.

    He says to consider who has ultimate authority at the pentagon. Actually he was more blunt, but my love for him stops before my own death!

    I will point out that this person is credited with a picture of rummy at the pentagon on 912.

  • Yep it is on the pentagon renavator site. and it was not until 91301

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more