First Americans not Australian,not African

[hellbent130]

This engineering project of the great wall of China is still younger than all the pyramids in Giza that are younger than those in Nubia. Saying this and seeing how old the pyramids in the ancient Americas, one couldn't help but speculate them to be Black or of Black ancestry. And isn't it kinds of ironic this was only done in the lower Americas like I stated before not in the upper Americas at all. Go figure that one out.

[hellbent130]

People on the internet love to just state their opinion and what they feel is fact. The fact is this why did most native american tribes remain unchanged for thousands of years. if they in the Inuit people were the same then why didn't they change and build pyramids in the U.S. part the the Americas. I don't believe and is truly not convince these people were Asian. The first advanced civilization was in Africa, pyramids support that. A wall not pyramids show proof of asian engineering.

[hellbent130]

This video has debunked itself, where are the pyramids in Mongolia or in any white or african nation. You can also tell this video was just done to debunk or try and prove that they were not African. The guy clearly comes up with his own concept after the construction of Lucille as noted in the video. This means any evidence hence forth in this video will be to disprove any African ancestry. The video doesn't prove anything it just proves the scientist bias views on the subject.

[hellbent130]

@hellbent130 what i meant is where are the pyramids in any white or asian nations.

[hellbent130]

I dont see any facts supporting this video. How do you explain that no asian culture ever built pyramids. If you go by this guy the ancients didn't also have the technology to build the pyramids. For everybody supporting this B.S. get a life the title stinks and you guys stink. This very video is the proof of racism and speculation, for one in the begining he speculated they didn't have the technology. If they could build the pyramids why couldn't they build a boat.

[mariaesperanzalopez]

all natives of the Americas are mongoloid race

[MooPotPie]

@mariaesperanzalopez DNA would suggest that this is true. Who the "elongated skull people" of Paracas were is yet to be determined. They had wavy red hair and they appear to be of a different species. They built the pre-Inca monolithic structures. They are not to be confused with Mongoloid people who shaped their skulls in childhood to emulate these "gods".

[mariaesperanzalopez]

@MooPotPie shup up fuckin' nigger, u r so stupid n lier

[MooPotPie]

@mariaesperanzalopez You just got yourself reported for hate speech. Your account will be deleted. Strange, because my comment agreed with yours. Do you even know whom you're responding to? Look up "Paracas elongated skulls" if you don't know what I'm talking about.

[liquidsnake123]

@MooPotPie

There are NO "red haired"/atlantians anything.All that crap is pushed by psuedo historians who want to make money and become famous with their wild thoeries.Black racist eat this new age shit up as it ties to their wet dreams about "black" Egypt.

NO BLACK Egypt!Game over Afroturd.No more trying to muddy the waters with your BS.

Afrocentrism/New Agers are ENEMIES of Native people as they are continuing the conquest that began in 1492.

Paracas/Nazca were Amerindians.

[MooPotPie]

@liquidsnake123 You're free to believe as you wish, but those skulls do exist. They are found globally and they DO have red hair.They are displayed in several museums in Peru. I did NOT say they were "Atlantians". I do not claim to know where they came from, and I certainly do not think they were "Africans". We do not disagree about the Afrocentrists, by the way, but I don't see what this has to do with their Egypt and Olmec conspiracies. I am not a "New Age" anything, but those skulls are REAL.

[hellbent130]

@liquidsnake123 It kind of ironic how you can debunk or try to debunk egypt being black where the evidence clearly states they were black. Let take for example, Nubia where the Nubians are and still are today are known to be black. Nubians also have pyramids that predate the ones in Giza. Now where is your Asian Kingdoms in Asia to compare with the Myan and Aztec Pyramids.

[blokcom]

Re read his posts and see the contradictions. For one, he said "You people who see and interpret everything in a politicized racial way"... when he commented to kemet98, he speaks of this country as a White skin country considering the "Hispanics coming in." Who's politically racially charged here?

[interstellarwonder]

demimond11 is a racist genocidalist cockasian

[BETAmosquito]

Do you have a link to that report, or even better, a link to the translation?

[mariaesperanzalopez]

all natives of the Americas are mongoloi race

[interstellarwonder]

@mariaesperanzalopez your a lying genocidalist racist

[Kemet93]

SAYS WHAT YOu whant

this is not white

nation.

america

is not white

so open you'r eye.

[liquidsnake123]

@Kemet93

This is Native land not "blacky" or "whitey" land.Understand?

[gotcod7]

@liquidsnake123 do you hate US WHITES?

[blokcom]

@Kemet93 Another devil lying through his teeth. You are see-thru and are making your people look very bad. The world is watching.

[demimond11]

@Kemet93 It is a fact that Indians of this Hemisphere came from several different racial types. Many Indians are of Caucasian heritage: look at many of the Eastern Tribes and look at several of the Peruvian tribes for a few examples. Mongoloids and Caucasoid types make up the racial heritage of Indians. Also, 85% of the USA is Caucasian, Blacks are only 11%. The USA is a White country for the most part and will continue to a White Skin country when you consider the Whites Hispanics coming in.

[liquidsnake123]

@demimond11

There were and are NO "white/caucasoid" or "black/negroid" in the Americas.There is only Amerind types.Modern Genetics have porven that Native Americans from North to South America are of Siberian extraction.They features evoloved on these lands.Go back to school and stop watching stomfront/black power propaganda.That's why I don't bother responding to these stupid comments

[demimond11]

@liquidsnake123 Your information is quite out of date. Caucasoids do not just come from Europe. They originated in Asia and had migrated extensively, as most humans are want to do, over the earth. The migration into the Americas across the Land Bridge from Siberia into the Western Hemisphere did not filter out Caucasoids. The racial makeup of Indians throughout the Americas is convoluted and indicates a mixing of racial types. Study the peoples in the lands between Europe and Asia, fool.

[liquidsnake123]

@demimond11

"Caucasoid" are nothing but try hard attempts for an "aryan" establishment in the Americas.How is it that all Native Americans from North to South are Sidodonts and have Northeast/southcentral Asian lineages?How can they be "caucasoid" fool?Natives are not "turanids" (an outdated) term.

I know you follow stomfront propaganda and will next tell me something about the "white" mummies in China so here is something for you:.

[demimond11]

@liquidsnake123 You have a confused mind. There is no such animal as a "pure" Asian, whether a "Chinese, Thai or whatever! You need to take a class in physical anthropology. There are many anthropologists who argue that there is no such thing as a race: comparing any one "race" to another only shows a profile of distributed gene frequencies across traits. Stop trying to do your black revisionist interpretations of what you read as a hobby. When people disagree with you you scream racist..

[liquidsnake123]

@demimond11

You're tyring ot push a "caucasoid" origins in south america when south america is dominated by Y haplogroup Q and mtDNA A,B,C and D.mtDNA X has been shown to be restricted to North American natives.What "caucasoid" South American Peruvians are you talking about? Is it the Quechua or the Brazilian Yanomami?Or is it only where civilization was established?Don't play your games here, this is what black supremacist do.

[demimond11]

@liquidsnake123 I know your type: you read one or two books and accept the information as gospel or you accept anything that you want to believe because you need to believe it. You are no scholar and have no understanding of genetics or physical anthropology what-so-ever. Just an insecure man.

[liquidsnake123]

@demimond11

Rubbish,all the DNA studies I've read so far on Native Ameicans doesn't support your failed theories.The only people who support this type of crap are pseudo historians(don voniken/graham hancock/stormfront/black power types) with agendas who want it to be true but have no evidence to back it up their claims.No serious scholar takes you failed theories seriously.

[liquidsnake123]

@demimond11

"On one point,as few others,there is a broad consensus: the first Americans came from Asia.There is nothing to suggest otherwise in the artifacts,teeth,languages,or genes(that includes autosomal DNA,as well as mtDNA and NRY)."

[liquidsnake123]

@demimond11

"It's true even in regard to skeletal remains-Kennewick and other like-headed crania having now been rescued from their dubious assignment as "caucasoids" and that wrongly implied of their ancestry.(Eshleman,Malhi,and Smith 2003;Merriwether 2002;K.Shroeder et al. 2007;G. Steele and Powell 2002;Straus,Meltzer,and Goebel 2005;Turner 2002;Wang et al 2007"

[liquidsnake123]

@demimond11

"The near-universal concensus that America's first peoples were bygone Asians occurs no matter the differences of evidence and opinions regarding exactly where in Asia they originated."

[liquidsnake123]

@demimond11

"Pinning down a more specific place of origin(s) is no easy task,least of all for archaeology.Sites in northeast Asia are sparse,and thereare few that can unequivocally linked to the first Americans,But then we don't expect too close a correspndence in the pleistocene archeology of Asia and America.The migration from one continent to the other,adopting and settling along the way,assuredly took centures,possibly even millenia."

[demimond11]

@liquidsnake123 Yes, archaeology can be exciting but frustrating because it wets our appetite but at the same time it leaves us even more hungry for information. The tragedy of the American Indians is a depressing one but we must understand such is man, a dangerous predator at heart. Even most of the Indian tribes were war-like predators among themselves. Blacks as well. Sadly for them both another predator came along to swallow them up.

[interstellarwonder]

@demimond11 see this is why i have lost all respect for black ppl. "Sadly for them both another predator came along to swallow them up. "

[interstellarwonder]

@interstellarwonder taking about my family and relations like that... fuck right off bitch.

[MooPotPie]

@interstellarwonder Predators only swallow the weak and inferior. It's called "survival of the fittest." Maybe the Bantu genocide waged against the indigenous African Pygmies (not to mention the invention of slavery) had Karmic consequences. Just speculating, of course.

[interstellarwonder]

@MooPotPie so your saying native american blood shed over the last 500 years by europeans karma will pay them a visit?you believe in karma?

[MooPotPie]

@interstellarwonder I'd speculate that it has already started. Depends on what these particular natives ("Indians") did to the people here before them…the red-haired giants, for example.. (Yes, I believe in Karma. I've experienced it on a smaller scale too many times not to believe it. Most cultures seem to believe in a version of the phenomenon, e.g. "As ye sow, so shall ye reap".)

[interstellarwonder]

@MooPotPie i don't understand what your saying. speculate what? what if i am a 12 native kid your talking too?

[interstellarwonder]

@demimond11 Y is there such a polarity in your commentary? there is no talk about humans in a "we all in this together"? why is that?it is opposite to caring and human growth,etc., please why such take such a stance as that?what if young native ppl ( and they will at some time in the near future) read your words ,will your words make their hearts grow or cause their hearts to dry-up because of sadness?why such polarity?

[demimond11]

@interstellarwonder You raise a good point. We should all show more restraint. Thanks for the positive feedback!

[interstellarwonder]

@demimond11 hows your grammar? actually, it is a question. 

[liquidsnake123]

@demimond11

"By the time the first Americans arrived in southern South America,their toolkits had changed in significant and subtle ways.These were not colonist who clambered aboard a ship in Old England and disembarked in New England just a few months later with material culture and ideas intact"

David J.Meltzer,Professor of Anthropology at Southern Methodist University

[demimond11]

@liquidsnake123 Liquid, we are talking about "origins" that go back much farther than the colonial period. We could have a good discussion on the topic. Lets keep it civil and from degenerating into name-calling.

[blokcom]

@demimond11 You said, "you read one or two books and accept the information as gospel or you accept anything that you want to believe because you need to believe it." And this is exactly what you have done. The dominant general agreement IS an ancient Asian origin, not your two or three books that YOU have read.

[demimond11]

@blokcom I was not referring to me; I was referring to you reading one or two books. Also, "Asian Origin"? Asia is filled with Caucasians and has been for thousands of years. For your information the vast majority of people in India are classified to be Caucasian; and this includes Aryan and non-Aryan Caucasians. Look at the peoples of the Stan- countries: their Mongoloid/Caucasian mixture is as apparent as it is among many Indians of the American Hemisphere.

[blokcom]

@demimond11 I know you were referring to Liquidsnake, duh. But by what you are claiming, is telling - one or two books YOU are reading, and/or outdated or conspiracy related. Basically, no ancient white foundation for the Americas. You are lying or you are completely ignorant of what's what. Stop acting like MsBlackkkmagic because your methods are no different.

[demimond11]

@blokcom You must learn to read more carefully and not invent things that are not said. My point was not that there was a Caucasian origin to Indians, but that their origins were "convoluted", meaning that the origins draw from different breeding populations, both Mongoloid and Caucasian. You people who see and interpret everything in a politicized racial way are quite sick. Maybe you should all stay out of discussions you know nothing about.

[blokcom]

@demi; I know what you said. I don't care if you said they were "convoluted" with the Ainu. What if the Mongoloids spawned Caucasians? After all, hap x split, with one group going west and the other east. Since all you offer is speculation, I can too. And nice going with your assumption that this is politically racial, when actually, we are just defending native history when it is you who is racially political about this. This crap has been ongoing since Columbus....cont...

[blokcom]

Today the "science" has almost unanimously suggest an Asian origin. If there was any 'convolution," it would have been so far back in time, 50 or 60,000 yrs ago, maybe longer, before entry into the Americas. I am sure "White," wasn't really "White" way back then. Not saying Black, but as studies show, the pigment of Whites were probably not so light as they are today including Asians....

[demimond11]

@blokcom I would not form such dogmatic opinions based upon "interpretations" that are drawn from theories formed over extrapolations. What one year they thought was solid ground the next year turns out to be shifting sands: ie Einstein's belief in the absolute speed of of light is now being challenged. Once it was thought that Africa was the "birth-place" of man; now they "theorize" based on the latest find that it may have been Asia. There are many Indians who do not look Mongoloid.

[liquidsnake123]

@demimond11

If it's not the white supremaicst trying to claim north america with kennewick man it's the black scum trying to claim south america with luzia.Both of you need to fuck off

[demimond11]

@liquidsnake123 Listen, there is no way that your are a pure-blooded Indian. Most Indians pass off for Indian but are mostly White now. Get over it pseudo-amer-indian man!

[interstellarwonder]

@demimond11 both whites and blacks racist fuckers always refer to this ,when their arguments are shot down by facts, you have no heart, i know you are a genocidalist black racist.

[liquidsnake123]

@demimond11

The whole "tall caucasin" is a white supremacist fantasy. Here are the facts:

1) they measured the Cherchen Man's (the red haired mummy) actual height. He's around 5'9". Normal height of any man - Chinese or not.

2) they tested the Cherchen man's DNA - his DNA had tracers from eastern China, India, and Europe. He is the product of migrants from Europe, India, and eastern China who met in central China.

[demimond11]

@liquidsnake123 I don't know what you are saying. After reading this post of yours it seems we are in agreement. This is what "convoluted" means. Whether people migrated or not, they do not keep a pure stock. This is one reason why all the races still stay as one species instead of evolving into different species, although such individual paths of evolution does take place depending on selective pressures.

[liquidsnake123]

@demimond11

Tarim Mummies 5 of 5

watch?v=xE-liHf7dLM

Evidence that a West-East admixed population lived in the Tarim Basin as early as the early Bronze Age(2010)

White supremacist fantasy CRUSHED!

[MsBlackmagic13]

The indigenous peoples of the Americas are the people from southern Asia, Australia and the southern pacific rim! The mongoloid from east Asia did not come until MUCH later and true to form the barbaric Mongoloid started killing the actual indigenous people and civilization was not achieved in the Americas until the Africans came! After the root population of Africans died out they were absorbed by the existing populations! This is why they are opposed to DNA testing of the oldest remains

[MsBlackmagic13]

You do understand that the world was populated by Africans walking out of Africa in which their lineages became non African and became the founder lineages for all non Africans right? Look at my video and you will see what they looked like! Everyone comes from Africa, original populations resembled OOA migrants for tens of thousands of years before they morphologically changed into their present day phenotype! You DO understand this right?

[liquidsnake123]

@MsBlackmagic13

Africa is a land mass not a race.Bantus(YOU) are a recent phenomena.You are new to the scene.

"Asselar Man,the result of intense polygyny is the oldest(6,500yrs) representation of negroids.(Peter Frost-Anthropologist)"

[MooPotPie]

@liquidsnake123 Bantus have been exterminating the indigenous Pygmies for centuries.

[polychronio]

@MsBlackmagic13 so you think if someome has two eyes and one nose, they look like africans lol?

[demimond11]

@MsBlackmagic13 You are so outdated with your information that you are a joke. The current theory is that man originated in Asia. Also, the fact that man MAY have first emerged in Africa in no way means he was black! Race developed later. Stop with the black revisionism based upon construction of an ego.

[MsBlackmagic13]

OK lets go back to the study dummy! In the study the North African Mozabite and South African Cape MIXED Ancestry is made up of some of the SAME ANCESTRAL COMPONENTS. It doesn't matter that they inhabit the opposite geographical extremes of the continent!! JUST GIVE IT UP DUMMY! You are not bright enough to engage with me! But beyond that! why do you want to con and trick people into believing a lie? YOU KNOW that you are lying and distorting and yet you STILL do it! That soundfs evil to me!

[blokcom]

@MsBlackmagic13 If you don't have proof, just make it up. Ivan Van Sertima did.

[MsBlackmagic13]

The study shows what we already knew! That the Berber speaking people genetically being a population of RECENT MIXED ANCESTRY did not produce their OWN SPECIFIC ANCESTRAL Cluster....but were a member of various OTHER ANCESTRAL CLUSTERS! We already knew this! ANYONE without an agenda and interested in the TRUTH already knew this! Now science PROVES IT! Just as we ALSO know that the modern day Egyptians do NOT represent the ancients! You crackers hate blacks so much that you will say anything!

[polychronio]

@MsBlackmagic13 north africans are not mixed....why do africans try to make everybodu negloid.... stupid low iq negloid race....north african is e3b which is latin white people...if you wanna see the mixed african, look somalian ,niger, ethiopians...they are what mixed with negro people look like...

[MsBlackmagic13]

Anyone can look at the study for themselves! you will notice the North African sample (Mozabite Berber) does not have its OWN specific Ancestral cluster but is a mixture of 3 primary clusters Niger Kordofanian, Eurasian, Cushitic. IMAGINE THAT! The only time "African" does NOT equal Black is when it is MIXED! The Berber speaking people are not unique genetically at all! They are just Mixed Africans like I said! JUST AS the modern day Egyptians are! it is the same thing! You big dope!

[MsBlackmagic13]

Typing fast is not going to dismiss this TRUTH I am smacking you in the head with dummy! If you notice these clusters were based on self described ethnicity" and shared cultural and/or linguistic properties! Now ask yourself where does the "Self Described" Ethnicity and Shared cultural / linguistic group represented as "Berber People" in these 14 Ancestral Clusters? Whewre are these white Berbers? Thats right dummy! YOU DONT SEE IT BECAUSE IT SIMPLY DOES NOT EXIST!

[MsBlackmagic13]

The 14 ancetral clusters are! Mbugu, Chadic, Saharan Cushitic, Eastern Bantu, NiloSaharan, Saharan/Dogon, Fulani, Western Bantu, S.African Khoesan/Mbuti, Niger Kordofanian, Sandawe, Central Sudanic, Hadza, W.Pygmy! I hope that you are still with me dummy! Take a look at those clusters for a moment dummy! marinate on it and let it sink in a bit!!

[MsBlackmagic13]

"We observed high levels of mixed ancestry in most populations, reflecting historical migration events across the continent. Our data also provide evidence for shared ancestry among geographically diverse hunter-gatherer populations (Khoesan speakers and Pygmies). The ancestry of African Americans is predominantly from Niger-Kordofanian (~71%), European (~13%), and other African (~8%) populations" END QUOTE!!!!.... The study identified 14 clusters!...now lets NAME those 14 Ancestral clusters!

[MsBlackmagic13]

"We studied 121 African populations, four African American populations, and 60 non-African populations for patterns of variation at 1327 nuclear microsatellite and insertion/deletion markers. We identified 14 ancestral population clusters in Africa that correlate with self-described ethnicity and shared cultural and/or linguistic properties."

[MsBlackmagic13]

I will just quote the study if you dont mind! AND I QUOTE... "Africa is the source of all modern humans, but characterization of genetic variation and of relationships among populations across the continent has been enigmatic"

[MsBlackmagic13]

You don't have to take my word for it though! Lets just go to the largest study on genetics in Africa to date! :Tishkoff et al 2009.

The Genetic Structure and History of Africans and African Americans Are you familar with this study dummy? Are these the so called lies that you are affraid of? ANYONE can go look it up for themselves! Tishkoff et al 2009.

The Genetic Structure and History of Africans and African Americans is the name of the study! And now I am going to put you to sleep!

[liquidsnake123]

@MsBlackmagic13

I am not African so this doesn't concern me.Go take it up with the REAL Africans(Berbers).I could care less

[MsBlackmagic13]

You are a Berbercentric! an Amazigh/Berber activist, a racist and an all around fool! Are you also a failed paralegal? The modern Egyptians are not the descendants of the ancient Egyptians just like the modern Berbers are not the descendants of the Ancient Libyans. In fact a black mummy was found in the Libyan desert that predates ancient Egypt PROVING that the ancient Libyans were black! NOT white Northern Africans that are there now! Why do you have a hard time admitting that dummy?

[liquidsnake123]

@MsBlackmagic13

Africa = black is a false myth.This myth needs to be destroyed."Africa" never came from the black race and should be given back to the true owners.Sub-Saharan Negroid Blacks have stolen this name from the REAL Africans a.k.a BERBERS.

[liquidsnake123]

@MsBlackmagic13

Afrocentrist have even made up names lik Abekulan,Afrakans, and Anexum, for the continent of Africa which they deliberately exclude the indigenous North Africans as "foreigners" and "invadors". Why? From their obvious looks.North Africans don't look black negroid at all.

[liquidsnake123]

@MsBlackmagic13

As you already know Africa wasn't named after the Roman conquerer ,Scipio Africanus ... it's Scipio Africanus who was named after Africa.When Berber Massinissa' cavalry along with Roman infantry defeated Hannibal's Army in the battle of Zama in Tunisia.

Africa was just Tunisia and a bit of Algeria and Libya and it was called that because of the Berber "Afri" tribes that lived south of Carthage.



[liquidsnake123]

@MsBlackmagic13

Only 200 years ago did the colonial powers " France and England" decided to call the whole continent Africa.

Publius Cornelius Scipio was his real name and the nickname "Africanus" was given to him AFTER he conquered what was know as AFRICA! Africa itself has 2, 3 origins of name, one is phoenician the other is by native inhabitants of North Africa. so the name of Africa already existed long ago before the roman conquest

[liquidsnake123]

@MsBlackmagic13

Roman's would call themselves Germanicus or Britannicus for similar reasons

'Afri' came from the name of the Berbers who lived in the (now Tunisia etc.) Roman province, and -ca was a Roman suffix. So perhaps the whole word isn't berber (perhaps it is), but it certainly comes from the Berber/Aamazigh word

[liquidsnake123]

@MsBlackmagic13

the beginning only LYBIA AND TUNiSIA WHERE CALLED AFRICA by the romans.because the rest of AFRICA was not discovered yet. IFRIQUA is the original world of AFRICA and means cold cave

[liquidsnake123]

@MsBlackmagic13

So you see you're not "African" you're an IMPOSTER!.You are sub-saharan bantu negroid...that is all :)

[MsBlackmagic13]

Whites in North Africa are the result of foreign migrations into North Africa and NONE of those migrations brought Berber languages into Africa. There is absolutely NO proof whatsoever of ancient white Africans originating in the Sahara except in the minds and imaginations of people like you who have historically tried their best to make the Sahara and North Africa a cradle for ancient White civilization! Unlike yourself I do not need to parrot anyone, I achieved a higher education!

[liquidsnake123]

@MsBlackmagic13

I am sorry to inform you that "whites/berbers" were in the sahara for a long time.They are a very ancient people.There is no such thing as "diversity" on that continent.All that diveristy is due to the many past back migrations into that continent.All those mullatos you like to pass off as "diversity" are the result of other races mixing with negros.Very few negro groups are diverse due to ecology.Most comes from racial admixture.Sorry.DNA don't lie.

[MsBlackmagic13]

DNA analysis of the OLDEST skulls found in the Americas reveal that the indigenous Americans were NOT related to the so called Native Americans and that they PREDATED their settling the Americas! They did NOT originate in Northern Asia but instead from the ancient populations of southern Asia, Australia, and the South Pacific Rim! You can hold on to your fantasy if you like! But the mongoloid myth is being dismantled! My video shows you what the original natives looked like!

[liquidsnake123]

@MsBlackmagic13

Lol alright smartass.Tell me what haplotypes they carry that seperates them from the others ?I know you are regurgitating the same crap you've watched from afrocentric videos such as sara suten seti.Your comments just shows how little you know about this subject and are nothing but another youtube afrocentric "scholar".

[MsBlackmagic13]

First off you are an ignoramus! YOU are trying to say that because most so called American Indians resemble the people of Mongolia, China and Siberia that these so called native Americans originated from northern Asia that walked from northeast Asia across a land bridge, formed at the end of the Ice Age, to Alaska some 12,000 years ago, and then migrated across North and South America! This is what YOU want everyone to believe! UNFORTUNATELY this is false!!! Now I will tell you the TRUTH!

[liquidsnake123]

@MsBlackmagic13

Native Americans don't look like chinese retard.Chinese don't have the typical Amerindian hook nose trait along with other traits.New World Populations have evolved since their comming from the Old World.New Wolrd and Old World differentiate in their genetics,language,and dentition.It's called evolution.

[liquidsnake123]

@MsBlackmagic13

There are two thoeries for entries into the americas the ice coridor sheet and the pacific coast rim(the distribution of mtdna D4h3 supports this).DNA,Language,Teeth(denta­l traits),skeletal remains support this.Not to mention the NON-metric measurements methods(cranial and dental) that are used that are only found in Amerindian populations.All dental/cranial METRICS fall into the Native American range.Race is real and Amerindians are in no way related to your kind(Bantuids).

[MsBlackmagic13]

and why would I blame the Berber speaking peoples for anything? They were originally BLACK! They have only recently been bastardized buckaroo! Similar to how the Egyptians have been bastardized! Do you follow dummy? don't make me have to wax that ass with an in depth lesson about the Berber speaking people! The last time I did that "samysamy25" deleted almost ALL of my comments! Do you know him dummy? LOL STOP STEALING MY CULTURE ASSWIPE!

[liquidsnake123]

@MsBlackmagic13

lol The Berbers are a white racial group no matter how much you hate it.They are the first ones to enslave your people and your own people complied because they were having their own tribal wars with each other.Still do.Berbers raped sub-saharn woman that's why some look part black.They have a long history of slave tradingTake a look at Ibrahim AG Bahanga who is the leader of the northen mali tuareg rebellion.You tell me this guy looks "black"That's how the nobles look like.

[liquidsnake123]

@MsBlackmagic13

Not true modern egyptians are "blacker" today thanks to their participation in arab slave trade.Egyptian Muslims men imported black female slave concubines for their harems and raped them.

That's another one of your peoples humiliating legacy.The trans-saharan slave trade.Nothing but Arabs,Berbers,and uncle tom black muslims selling their own people in exchange for guns,drugs,rum,and money.You won't hear this in public schools because it would upset the chimps(you).

[MsBlackmagic13]

Now take a look at the video in my page! and tell me that I don't understand physical anthropology! Tell me how Amerindians are in no way related to sub saharan Africans! I guess the people you are looking at in the video in my page must be mongoloids! LOL You are a dumb ass! They are Asian and part of the great coastal migration of humans from Africa along the coastal regions of the Indian mainland and towards Southeast Asia, Japan and Oceania AND the FIRST people in the Americas! Sorry pal!

[liquidsnake123]

@MsBlackmagic13

These aren't sub saharans they are asians nothing to do with bantuids.Their language group,genetics,and other traits puts them far away from bantu negroids.Race is more than just skin color.

I won't continue arguing with an afrocultist/black supremacist who's brainwashed by propaganda.I know the lies your lot follow.

[MsBlackmagic13]

actually the Mongoloid is an invader to the Americas! and true to its barbaric nature they killed many of the REAL indigenous Americans upon their arrival! Then the African came and started civilization in the Americas and when that root population died out it was absorbed! No matter how you slice it the Mongoloid is a FRAUD! and that Mongoloid myth is being systematically destroyed! This is why these frauds FEAR DNA testing! It is why they are taking the US to court to prevent DNA testing!

[liquidsnake123]

@MsBlackmagic13

There is no such thing as "mongoloid".If Native Americans are to be called by the geographical location that they came from then it's not "mongols" you pathetic retard, It's SIBERIA. So they should be "Siberians" dumb dumb. There is no nagpra in south and central america so your delusions are just that.Native Americans from alaska to the tip of south america have the same ancestral genetic markers and non come from sub-sahara african bantus (i.e. YOU).

[MsBlackmagic13]

Unfortunately your lies and distortions will not work here! The first people to in the new world were from southern asia, australia and the southern pacific rim! and playing in my page is an example of what they looked like! BTW DNA says that they are Asian and belong to a lineage, known as M! Anyway you are a dumb ass and a liar! Stop stealing my culture! Mongoloids are immigrants that came MUCH later so they are FRAUDS as far as being indigenous is concerned! My video shows the TRUTH!

[liquidsnake123]

@MsBlackmagic13

Your video shows lies and severe delusions.

Native Americans from Alaska to Tierra Del Fuego have tested for the exact same haplotypes mtDNA A2, B2, C1b, C1c, C1d, C4c, D1, D4h3, and X2a.Along with Y chrom Q-M3,R1-M173 and C3b.

The % distribution of these haplotypes vary by Indigenous groups.Showing variation.

[liquidsnake123]

@MsBlackmagic13

Some hg's mutations found in the Americas are exclusive to Native Americans,meaning they are ONLY found in Native American populations.New World Sinodonts(Native Americans) differentiate from Old World Sinodonts.And Dental variations found WITHIN Native American populations are present.Different frequencies of double shoveling,carabeli cusps,etc dentition within differnent indigenous groups shows this

[liquidsnake123]

@MsBlackmagic13

mtDNA A,B,C,D,X and Y chrom Q,R,and C are hg's that originate in East and Central Asia.Not Sub-Sahara Africa.Native Americans are their own people.

You are clueless on this issue.Go steal someone else history.

[blokcom]

@MsBlackmagic13 : STFU already

[NopeJPeg]

@MsBlackmagic13

Seems someone got themselves inducted into that special little group known for their perceptions against America's first peoples. Now put on your black robe and maybe your white-hooded brethren and sistern will let you play what with your shared anti-Indian views. Mongoloid is a recent phenotype existing after New World migration. About as old as Asselar Man, perhaps. lol

[buffyjosmom]

@MsBlackmagic13 Take your own advice, history stealing, White, Native American, Asian, Mexican, East Indian, Arab hating afro-centric black female.

[MsBlackmagic13]

ANOITHER SALSASSIN LIE

walter neves 2010

New World Settled Twice: Two-migration Scenario for the Americas

The two-migration scenario proposed in the study. Blue dots represent recent modern human populations. Red dots represent the Paleoamerican samples used. Image Copyright Mark HubbeA new analysis of Early American skeletons concludes that the large anatomical difference seen between ancient and recent Native Americans is best explained by two colonisation events of the New World.

[liquidsnake123]

@MsBlackmagic13

They are all Amerindians with shared genetics not sub-saharan negroid apes.These people don't carry any sub-saharan haplotypes.You don't understand physical anthropology Amerindians are in no way related to sub-saharan Africans.Eighter anthropologically or genetically.Their closest genetic relatives are east asians.And race is more than just skin color.Go steal someone elses history.

[liquidsnake123]

@MsBlackmagic13

White and Blacks are invadors on this land.Go blame the Europeans,Arabs,Berbers,and your own people for your enslavement.It stil goes on today in Africa.

[interstellarwonder]

8:35 you can see the dark make-up on the young girls face, look at the top of her forehead it;s lighter in colour.