Science's Limitation and the Spiritual Dimension - Part 4

[OpenMind00]

The key to faster than Light speed is: Max Plank's E=hf

[OpenMind00]

No one can achieve the speed of light in the Physical universe. However, there is theory that claims you can go as fast or faster by changing your frequency structure. By lowering your mass to 0 you are no longer bound by Einstein Law from attaining the speed of light - u r mass-less. See the Hutchinson effect. He pulsates a 75-pound steel ball with very low frequency waves and then medium-high-frequency radio waves and ultra-high radio waves and the cannon ball levitates! SO.........

[OpenMind00]

So.... In order to travel the speed of light or faster within the Physical Universe you must be outside the Physical Universe. You must change your Frequency and or your atomic structure and in essence be outside of the Physical Universe in order to travel at light speed and faster. Once you have achieved your Destination. You revert back to your original Atomic structure and wallah you are back in. Yes a need of an enormous amount of energy is required. Its actually Quite simple really.

[Gurczas]

And one more question: where does the additional mass comes from ?

Is it like that: the body which almost achieves the speed of light becomes shorter and that's why it becomes heavier? But in that case while approaching the infinite weight it would have to approach... its 2-dimensional form probably(or something like that).Is it what happens?

Or maybe when time slows down that lost "energy" transforms into mass? Or into gravity that gives this body that weight? (or is it the same?)

[JamesJTraitz]

I like the depth of your thinking and believe that you are achieving some valid insights that escape most of my readers. As mass crosses the threshold of above 99% of the speed of light it requires incredible momentum energy which still obeys Einsteins formula for mass/energy

[Gurczas]

I've heard some scientists say that one of possible ways of traveling through universe will be dematerialising matter into energy and beaming to where we want to go at the speed of light. I know that lightnings hit earth at the speed of light. And lightnings are in a state of plasma, I guess. So my question is:

Are plasma and pure energy the only two forms in which matter can achieve the speed of light?

[JamesJTraitz]

Matter and energy are two forms that rality takes in the world of 'appearances' beyond the physial dimension the speed of light is no longer relevant

[Gurczas]

Does it mean that plasma doesn't belong to the material world ???

[hizard]

It doesn't mean plasma doesn't belong to the material world Plasma is ionised gas. Lightning is beam of electrons which hits through air so ionising air and making it plasma, and then air shines so you see lightning as blue color. (maybe not exactly but something like that)

[mikesartjournal]

Your last comment about surpassing the speed of light yields backwards movement in time is not only assumptive at best as it is not testable, Einstein didn't agree with this idea. The speed of light, as it is considered timed, is not the medium from which forward and reverse time is measured, but it makes a sense for you to say it does, that is to say, see it as such.

[JamesJTraitz]

There now is some thought that when you go "backwards" in time you go forward in time in another dimension.

[kumquatkillah]

Of course I certainly hope that existence wasn't just a fluke or a roll of the dice.

[kumquatkillah]

Also, how does evolution fit in if we had originated from organic material no more alive than something such as a rock? And have we made ourselves a purpose because we couldn't understand the world around us? Then again these questions may be reaching a bit too far... :(

[kumquatkillah]

Hmm... that is an interesting interpretation. There is no doubt that everything is made of energy. I've still yet to see science and religion meet eye to eye on multiple issues. You had also said that whatever brought us here is God. Of course that brings into question, what is God and do we have a proper concept of Him?

[kumquatkillah]

Hmm... interesting. Don't get me wrong though, I'm ignostic, so I haven't made up my mind on what to believe. It's simply that when I look at religion and science, neither one separately has all the answers and, when put together, they do provide all the answers at the expense of conflicting with one another. Religion justifies itself and so does science, so what is one supposed to believe when they conflict?

[TurningIntoGod]

On the contrary, science and religion do not conflict, but they go hand in hand. Einstein spent his life trying to prove the existence of the unified field, a place in which all space, time, matter and energy co-exist as part of the same substance. This is infinity. The electricity in your brain permeates through this quantum field. Thus, the essence of you will exist forever.

[TurningIntoGod]

Furthermore, mankind had to arrive here someway, somehow, by whatever process, and by whatever means we arrived here, THAT is God, be it nature or an invisible man in the sky. Now that you know for a fact that God really exists, it is up to you to decide who and what he/she/it is. I personally accept Jesus Christ as my personal Lord and Saviour, but that is a matter of faith. The existance of God is FACT.

[JamesJTraitz]

The simplist answer is that our "physical" dimension emerges from an "inner" dimension in which resides our larger selfhood

[kumquatkillah]

The physics you explain in your discussions is interesting but I don't agree with your explanations of a spiritual dimension. Also, on matters such as evolution, I don't doubt the belief of survival of the fittest (we have even witnessed it in organisms such as bacteria). Nonetheless, your discussions are thought-provoking.

P.S. - What is your book about?

[JamesJTraitz]

My book covers the subjects in the videos.Why do you doubt the spiritual dimension?Do you believe that the world you percieve emerged from nothing?!

[kumquatkillah]

I believe something must have always existed... either God must have, in a sense, emerged from nothing or else the universe did... I still think it MAY have been possible for the second to be true although we have no definite answer to that question... I don't believe so much in a spiritual dimension so much because of my belief in Occum's Razor...

[wytworny]

Yes, time is plastic. They teach this in high school, don't they?

Do you want to connect this with the concept of God, or is it just me?