Added: 3 years ago
From: RKOwens4
Views: 44,744
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (4,202)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • To the friends of A&E.No university,research centers,technical journals,associations of engineers and architects believe the lies and the demolition of the"A&E".The same in Asia,Oceania,Canada,Europe and South America.The list below is today.I have the link of all.Always find more on the internet.There evidence against the towers and WTC7.Only 0.001% of U.S.engineers are in A&E.Without the universities the A&E will never convince the U.S. Congress to reopen anything.The A&E was born defected.

  • Scientific American . com

    Enr.com - Engeneerin news

    Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE

    Fire Protection Engineering

  • ArchitectureWeek.

    Popular Mechanics

    Century Dynamics, Inc. Concord, CA,

    Myers, Houghton & Partners, Inc. Structural Engineersm, Pacific Coast

    DeStefano Associates, and is a Partner in the firm of Coastal Engineering Partners.

    Teng & Associates, Inc. in Chicago.

    American Institute of Steel Construction Inc, Chicago (AISC),

  • American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 123,000 members

    American Institute of Architects (AIA), 80,000 members

    Association of de Wall & Ceiling Industry, 2.000 members that are primarily wall and ceiling contractors

    American Concrete Institute (ACI), 20,000 members spanning 108 countries.

    American Council Of Engineering Companies (ACEC), 6,000 independent engineering companies

    American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 120,000 members

  • American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), 35,000 members

    American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), 40,000 members

    American Standards Institute (ANSI), 125 mil empresas e 3.500 mil members.

    Department of Design and Construction (DDC) in NY,1,200 members

    International Metallographic Society,

    Institute of Structural Engineers Association of New York (SEAoNY),

    Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 370,000 members

  • Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, 15,000 members

    National Council of Structural Engineers Associations, (NCSEA), 12 mil members,

    National Fire Protection Association, (NFPA), 70,000 individuals around the world,

    Structural Engineering Institute, (SEI),

    Society for Fire Protection Engineering, (SFPE),

    Atlantic International University, Civil Engineering Department, Miami

    Columbia University, The Foundation School of Engineering and Applied Science

  • California Polytechnic State University, Civil and Environmental Engineering

    Cornell University, School Civil and Environmental Engineering & Department of Crop Soil Sciencies

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Engineering Department,

    Michigan State University, Engineering Department

    Northwestern University, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering,

    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Engineering Department,

  • University of California, Engineering Department,

    National Academy of Engineering,

    University of Pennsylvania, Civil Engineering Department,

    University of Maryland, Department of Fire Protection Engineering,

    State University of New York at Buffalo, Department. Of civil, structural & engineering

    Stanford University, Engineering Department,

    University of Notre Dame, Department of Civil Engineering and Geological Sciences and the Student Chapter of the Earthquake Engineering Research Institute

  • University of Wisconsin-Green Bay, Natural and Applied Sciences,

    University of Perdue, School of Civil Engineering,

    University of Arizona, Engineering Civil Department,

    University of Colorado, Engineering Civil Department,

    University of Louisville, Department of Urban and Public Affairs

    University of Akron, Department of Mechanical Engineering

  • University of Texas at El Paso, Department of Computer Science & Department of Public Administration

    University of Delaware, Department of Sociology , Criminal Justice, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering

    Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University,

    Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Massachusetts, Engineering Department,

    Washington State University; Department of Political Science, Criminal Justice , School of Electrical Engineering. and Computer Science,

  • Debunking on youtube mostly based on what debunkers have seen. Nobody can say what really happened to the WTC7. Nobody can even deny how did it look like when it collapsed yet it's easy to deny what ppl saw and hit "debunked" stamp on it, bcs the truthers have nothing but the cd vids to make comparisons. Still debunked no matter how does it look like. If something feels impossible, the debunked option is on effect immediatelly. What happens on UT... copy/paste debate.

  • You are living in a little world of delusion or manipulation.Either way I wont spend any energy with you. Waste of time.

  • The BBC reported there 'what do you know about the soloman building collapse. Anyone capable of critical thinking would know that 47 storey building arent easy to predict collapsing whilst on fire. Its the BBC not some cheap backstreet newspaper outfit. Why would anyone report to the BBC that the building would collapse if there has never been an instance in history of this happening prior.You are clearly a troll.Nice try but I know that you already know public opinion is at odds with your view

  • @Tbaldwin "Why would anyone report to the BBC that the building would collapse if there has never been an instance in history of this happening"

    Gee! I don't know. Maybe because 2 fucking steel framed buildings had just fucking collapsed!

    Did you really need me to tell you that genius?

    And maybe because the Associated Press had been getting news reports all day from the FDNY that WTC 7 had suffered serious structural damage, burned all day unfought and was in danger of collapsing!

  • @FnkDctr I feel that you are wasting your time on this character.Although you are stating facts based on actual eye witnesses including firefighters cops etc,scientists, structural engineers etc It will never be enough for some people who either have a vested interest to cover up what happened OR are just to frightened and have their heads up their arses.continued...

  • @Tbaldwin1971 How many firefighters who were there support truthers?

    How many cops?

    How many structural engineers have written a paper refuting NIST's findings?

    You claim to have all of this support and you won't be able to come up with one person to answer any of my questions.

    You're simply a gullible fool who has fallen for conspiracy bullshit because you're not capable of independent thought.

  • @FnkDctr Soon it will be universally excepted that the official account is FAKE and those who have clung onto it for so long will cringe with embarassment at their schoolboy error.

  • @cantonear1968 "Associated Press had been getting news reports all day from the FDNY that WTC 7 had suffered serious structural damage"

    Thats a lie

    They reported many BOMBS going off.

    Nobody said anything about "structural damage"

    Show me the reports please. Because when I google "wtc7 explosions"

    About 2,190,000 results

    over 2 million people are smarter than you. Why are you attempting to debate lies when you obviously have no education and havent done any research? troll

  • @FnkDctr

    "They reported many BOMBS going off."

    Who is "they?" Names please and full quotes.

    "Because when I google "wtc7 explosions"

    About 2,190,000 results

    The rest of what you write rivals that of a retarded chimp

  • @ExposeTheTwooferCult Come on RKOwens you inferior dumb nigger, click the 2 million links on google that contradict every bullshit lie you post.

    "Because when I google "wtc7 explosions"

    About 2,190,000 results

    Exactly, dumb nigger, go read 1 page and come back when you take your monkey lips off of Obama's dick

  • @FnkDctr "Nobody said anything about "structural damage""

    Really? Tell that to this firefighter on scene:

    watch?v=Bf7Z_I1CAZ4&feature=re­lmfu

    30 secs

    "the structural integrity is not there in the building"

    Aren't you tired of always being wrong yet?

  • @cantonear1968 Wow you really are clever. You poor little sheep. You havent studied the events of 9/11 as extensively as I have mate.You are way off.

  • @Tbaldwin1971 Seriously?

    All of this wasn't fucking obvious to you?

  • @cantonear1968 As expected, you have missed my point completely. I thought you would.What happened that day was an inside job.End Of!You just havent got the ability to see that for yourself.You saw those buildings totalling over a million tonnes of steel and concrete turn to dust.(in mid air)and you still clutch onto your little theory that defies the laws of physics.I bet you believe that Star Trek was a documentary.You thick prick.Im off to speak to some intelligent people.Good luck in life.

  • @baldwin No, I know exactly what your point was. I apparently know it better than you do. Because this is exactly what you wrote:

    "Why would anyone report to the BBC that the building [WTC 7] would collapse if there has never been an instance in history of this happening"

    Now that I have pointed out the stupidity of this statement, you suddenly don't want to talk about it!

    Don't worry about it baldwin. You're not the first idiot truther who realized he was in over his head and ran.

  • Well said

  • We bap-bap bada bo

    

  • @RickAstley56 Thanks Rick for your input on this serious event. Nice to see maturity prevails.

  • @Tbaldwin1971 Thanks

  • Lets stick to the video, since you are too uneducated to answer questions in a debate or provide factual evidence.

    Regardless of what the people said later in the day at 5pm

    Mayor Guiliani was informed the towers were going to collapse BEFORE any of them did.

    Please explain who gave him this information?

    Please explain why Barry Jennings said bombs were going off?

    Please explain free fall through the path of greatest resistance. Caused by fires. Violates newton's law

    Inside job 100%

  • @FnkDctr The mayor was also supposed to be in the building to meet michael hess

  • Lets stick to the video, since you are too uneducated to answer questions in a debate or provide factual evidence.

    Regardless of what the people said later in the day at 5pm

    Mayor Guiliani was informed the towers were going to collapse BEFORE any of them did.

    Please explain who gave him this information?

    Please explain why Barry Jennings said bombs were going off?

    Please explain free fall through the path of greatest resistance. Caused by fires. Violates newton's law.

    Inside job 100%

  • @FnkDctr "Please explain who gave him this information?" - No idea. You need to establish that your claim is factual first.

    "Please explain why Barry Jennings said bombs were going off?" - Because WTC1 collided with WTC7 causing damage and fires.

    "Please explain free fall" - Overall the buildings did not fall at free fall.

    " through the path of greatest resistance" - Gravity. Go read up on it.

    "Violates newton's law" - You may not know this but he had more than 1. Which 1?

  • @markh1011 "No idea. You need to establish that your claim is factual first."

    If you dont know who told someone at 9am, why do you make false claims at 5pm? Do you know what a timeline is crack head?

    "So are you claiming to be Jason Burmas?"

    No, I claimed to have watch Jason Burmas kick your ass in a debate. RKOwens.

    "I'm RKOwens"

    I knew you were, only he chops up comments and fails to answer questions like the crack head loser he is.

    Still cant answer my questions idiot?

  • @FnkDctr "If you dont know who told someone at 9am, why do you make false claims at 5pm?" - Could you at least try to make sense when you post?

    "No, I claimed to have watch Jason Burmas kick your ass in a debate. RKOwens."

    - lol I'm RKOwens moron.

    "I knew you were, " - You're making a fool of yourself.

    " only he chops up comments " - Oh yeah he's pretty much the only one on the internet who copies and pastes text. Yep just him.

    Idiot.

  • @markh1011 "@FnkDctr "If you dont know who told someone at 9am, why do you make false claims at 5pm?" - Could you at least try to make sense when you post?"

    I know mark, its too hard for you to understand a CLOCK since you never had a job in your life.

    THAT MORNING GUILIANI WAS TOLD THE TOWERS WERE GOING TO COLLAPSE BEFORE ANY FIREMEN MENTIONED WTC 7.

    WHOEVER TOLD GUILIANI HAD PRIOR KNOWLEDGE SINCE NO BUILDING COLLAPSED IN NYC AT THAT TIME.

    9am is before 5pm, DUHbunker.

  • @FnkDctr "THAT MORNING GUILIANI WAS TOLD THE TOWERS WERE GOING TO COLLAPSE BEFORE ANY FIREMEN MENTIONED WTC 7." lol I asked you to back this claim up and give me some evidence. All you've done is repeat it again in upper case! That's probably considered evidence in your failing mind...

    "9am is before 5pm" - So this is you avoiding providing evidence. Got it. Keep dancing about and waving your arms around.

  • @markh1011 "- lol I'm RKOwens moron."

    "You're making a fool of yourself."

    contradict yourself much crack head? even reply to the wrong accounts in your comments! lol moron.

    "who copies and pastes text."

    So thats your research? copy and paste? typical uneducated DUHbunker troll.

    Try doing some research on your own uneducated disinformant crack head.

    Too easy.

  • @FnkDctr "Try doing some research" - Funny because I seem to have done just the right amount of research to refute your poorly thought out claims....

    "You ran around them, and tried to say I didnt answer yours" - I responded to them. You ignored my responses and challenged me to answer them again.

    You're hopeless. You're too scared to actually debate anyone and would rather just spam them. Ignorant troll.

  • @FnkDctr "Still cant answer my questions idiot?" - I responded to your questions. As a response you just spammed the questions again.

    It's what trolls do when they don't want to debate a point. You've given up. You're surrender is accepted.

  • @markh1011 "@FnkDctr "Still cant answer my questions idiot?" - I responded to your questions"

    no, you havent.

    You ran around them, and tried to say I didnt answer yours, when I asked 3 questions first. I destroyed you with facts, and you dropped the subject.

    You still cannot debunk WTC 7 free fall, CNN photos being uploaded before 9/11, or Flight 77 cockpit door never opened.

    Run troll, run, you have no clue or facts

  • @FnkDctr "I destroyed you with facts, and you dropped the subject." - No I responded and you avoided my response. But you don't seem to have a particular interest in facts.. reality .. stuff like that so you just make things up to try and cover up your failings.

    "You still cannot debunk WTC 7 free fall," - What's to debunk? There was a period where part of the building was at virtual free fall.... and?!

  • @FnkDctr "Run troll, run, you have no clue or facts' - That's funny because I keep responding to you and you keep trying to change the subject.....you avoid my posts outright and to cover up your squirming you accuse me of running? You're trying to smokescreen your own failures.

  • @markh1011 "Violates newton's law" - You may not know this but he had more than 1. Which 1?"

    HaHaHaHaHaHa!!!

    Ok, THAT was funny!

  • @cantonear1968 WOW! you're still going for it in here huh? cantonear is the ULTIMATE Patriot, this is the man when it comes to knowing the know about 9/11. dude has been arguing against the angle, for what, years now? dude sits in the trenches and does some serious proving wrong hahahahhahahah

  • @sauce2034 That's funny, because I don't have a clue who you are.

    I guess you simply weren't worth remembering!

  • @cantonear1968 I remember you, you're the true patriot..the one that knows every single thing about everything that had to do with this day...What kind of looser sits here for over a year and argues with ppl who don't believe the gov't story? And rightfully so b/c its very hard to trust them now isn't it?

  • @sauce2034 Ah! The truther mentality! They get to come on here as much as they want because they're "fightin' the man!"

    But come on here and point out that they have absolutely no evidence to back up their claims beyond "The govt lies!", and suddenly that's not allowed!

    Don't forget to genuflect to the altar of Trutherism, sauce. And try to do something this time to make yourself more memorable.

  • @sauce2034 cantonear is RKOwens. He only trolls RKOwens videos cause only RKOwens gives a damn about his garbage videos with more dislikes than likes.

    Real debunkers debate on videos with facts and real evidence.

    Crack heads like RKOwens troll on fake youtube accounts because everyone knows he doesnt have anything to bring to debates other than bullshit to get more views on his propaganda videos

    Some crack heads will do anything for attention. Daddy issues RKOwens the crack head

  • @FnkDctr

    And fuckhead Dctr is 14 yr old in a mental hospital exercising his 1 hour a day on the internet to answer the voices in his head!

  • @FnkDctr "60,000 results, and you had no clue?"

    And I see you still didn't answer the question nor have you acknowledged that Newton had more than 1 Law!

    Typical truthie stupid ass reply with no substance!

  • @FnkDctr "nside job 100%" - Yes compelling stuff.

    So are you claiming to be Jason Burmas?

    Did you apply the same mental prowess to determine that I'm RKOwens that you used to work out it was a conspiracy?

  • @FnkDctr there's a video called "9/11 Debunked: WTC Accounts of Bombs & Explosions Explained." go to it, and see why there were so-called "explosions". and the free-fall thing, why don't you retime the collapses? they DIDN'T fall at that speed

  • @ryanmacdaddy1000 "and the free-fall thing, why don't you retime the collapses? they DIDN'T fall at that speed"

    NIST confirmed WTC 7 free fell. Why dont you go read a fucking report instead of trolling youtube videos you uneducated pile of shit. Thanks

    what scientists or engineers back up that bullshit you just posted?

    blueprint for truth over 1400 architects and engineers back up, put their name and face on the website.

    Thanks kid, go read or watch something real, not YT

  • @FnkDctr Are you not even going to acknowledge how stupid you are thinking "Nobody said anything about "structural damage"?

    I mean, you took one right in the nuts there, didn't you!

  • @cantonear1968 NIST confirmed the structural damage from debris has no significant factor in the cause of its collapse.

    Go read a book you dumb nigger Ryan Owens, you said Flight 93 hit the pentagon and the black box recorder was found where?

    Dumb parrot nigger. Go repeat some lil wayne lyrics and shut your baboon mouth.

  • @FnkDctr "NIST confirmed the structural damage from debris has no significant factor in the cause of its collapse."

    Right. We've been through this.

    "you said Flight 93 hit the pentagon"

    Right. I wrote 93 when I meant 77. You are going to beat this dead horse because it is literally the only thing you have and you can obfuscate answering the question because you know I am going to shove it up your ass!

  • @cantonear1968 "you said Flight 93 hit the pentagon"

    "Right."

    You are a fucking moron. If you understood that day, the flight patterns and what happened, you wouldnt confuse the two.

    But being an uneducated DUHbunktard with his head up RKOwens propaganda asshole, you cant even debate on a factual level which is why you parrot lies instead of researching on your own.

    DUHbunktards, cant think for themselves, and you just proved that. Propaganda parrot disinformant.

  • @FnkDctr "you said Flight 93 hit the pentagon"

    "Right."

    And you just gave a perfect example of the half truths and outright deception the truth movement uses to give a false impression of the point a person was making.

    I was not agreeing that Fl 93 hit the Pentagon.

    I was acknowledging that I mistakenly wrote that.

  • @cantonear1968 "I was not agreeing that Fl 93 hit the Pentagon.

    I was acknowledging that I mistakenly wrote that."

    Then why say "Right" ?

    Say, right, but what I meant was...

    You didnt.

    Dont try to discredit the truth because you are too lazy and uneducated to perform any type of research other than parrot lies you heard on youtube.

  • @FnkDctr So now that we got that out of the way, where was the FDR for Fl 77 found?

    That's the 6th time I have asked and you continue to obfuscate answering.

    Why?

  • @cantonear1968 I dont have to answer where they found the black box, since you dont answer my questions. And when you do, its lies. Blatant disinformation and verbal attacks since you have not performed any research and instead attack people who prove you and the official story wrong.

    How did WTC 7 free fall?

    How was flight 77 hijacked if the cockpit door never opened?

    How were CNN photos of victims uploaded before 9/11?

    Please dont copy and paste a duhbunker lie.

  • @cantonear1968 Hey Ryan Kyle Owens, go slap your stupid cunt mother Cynthia for supporting you being a traitor to our nation.

    Then you need to learn one thing you dumb pile of shit.

    Answer my questions first, before you move on in a debate you disinformant uneducated pile of dog shit.

    Its not my fault you confused flight 77 with flight 93. All other facts about those flights you bring up will be invalid since you copy and paste and havent read shit you DUHbunker parrot idiot

  • @cantonear1968 Scroll down, I been asking you the same questions for 2 weeks, and you refuse to answer. Dumb pile of shit.

    Hey asshole, show me airplane parts inside the pentagon.

    Of course you cant, official FBI evidence cant even confirm one piece of airplane debris INSIDE the pentagon.

    I bet they found the hijackers passport at ground zero too right?

    Only a dumb piece of shit like you would use planted evidence as fact.

    Answer my questions, you cant DUHbunk me loser

  • @cantonear1968 "rense com/general32/phot.htm"

    Not one of those photos confirm airplane parts INSIDE the pentagon.

    Did you look at them? NOPE.

    Was the flight 77 black box tampered with? YUP

    When and where did they find the black boxes at ground zero?

    Since you cant answer my questions, lets answer your questions with questions. MORON

  • @FnkDctr Gee! I provide you with what you ask for, and you don't believe it!

    I never saw that coming!

    I can only guess that you were expecting an intact plane. You're just that stupid!

    The point is, I answered your question.

    Where was the FDR for FL 77 found?

    That's the tenth time I've asked. Your cowardly avoidance is duly noted.

  • @cantonear1968 Enjoy the top comments? even duhbunkers know you are full of shit and lost this debate. Give up loser.

    "I provide you with what you ask for"

    then copy and paste it, because you havent provided any facts or links.

    I asked for photos of AIRPLANE DEBRIS INSIDE THE PENTAGON.. you provided none. Only photos of airplane debris outside the puncture exit.

    "The point is, I answered your question."

    The point is I asked 3, and you answered it wrong.

  • @FnkDct "Enjoy the top comments?"

    Yes, and I'm sure in some world that actually means something.

    It's also amazing how you can achieve this by logging in and out of different user names and giving yourself a "thumbs up" right up the ass!

    "I asked for photos of AIRPLANE DEBRIS INSIDE THE PENTAGON.. you provided none."

    I guess your cognitive reading skills are misfiring because the name of the webpage I gave you is "Photos Of Flt 77 Wreckage Inside The Pentagon"

    Funny how you missed that!

  • @FnkDctr 11th time:

    Where was the FDR for FL 77 found?

  • @cantonear1968 "I can only guess that you were expecting an intact plane. You're just that stupid!"

    Your insults dont cover the fact YOU were the one who just provided photos of no evidence. Atleast research your own spam uneducated parrot.

    "That's the tenth time I've asked"

    You went from 6 to 10..

    Ive asked the same 3 questions atleast 50 times.. let me know when you come up with an answer, and enjoy the top comments you loser.

    Won every debate so far.

    911 inside job

  • @FnkDctr "Your insults dont cover..."

    Ah! Is it that time of the month for you, fuckhead? You seem a little more sensitive than usual.

    I'll take it easier on you if you'd like. You just have to ask nicely.

  • @cantonear1968 "Yes, and I'm sure in some world that actually means something."

    it means more people agree with me than you..

    "I guess your cognitive reading skills are misfiring because the name of the webpage I gave you is "Photos Of Flt 77 Wreckage Inside The Pentagon""

    The photos say it wasnt even airplane parts, but colors of what could possibly be airplane debris.

    Still waiting kid, 51 times I asked you.

  • @FnkDctr "it means more people agree with me than you.."

    On you tube???

    Again, on some world, that probably means something.

    "but colors of what could possibly be airplane debris"

    What do you think "airplane debris" is?

    "The photos say it wasnt even airplane parts"

    Did you just simply ignore the photos of the engine part and the landing gear, photographed INSIDE the building?

    "Still waiting....51 times I asked you."

    And been answered 51 times.

    Where was the FDR for FL 77 found?

  • @cantonear1968 "possible" = not confirmed.

    "Did you just simply ignore the photos of the engine part and the landing gear, photographed INSIDE the building?"

    No such thing INSIDE the building, thanks.

    "And been answered 51 times."

    not once have you debunked flight 77 cockpit door being opened, WTC 7 free fall, or CNN photo dates.

    "Where was the FDR for FL 77 found?"

    Why didnt they find the ones at ground zero?

    dont answer a question with a question because you lost. idiot

  • @FnkDctr "not confirmed" =/= "The photos say it wasnt even airplane parts" "No such thing INSIDE the building, thanks." The majority of them are. You're welcome. "not once have you debunked flight 77 cockpit door being opened" Yes I have. "WTC 7 free fall" It's in NIST. I've asked you refute their findings. You have not. "CNN photo dates" And when did you prove anything on this? "Why didnt they find the ones at ground zero?" Because they were smashed beyond recognition.
  • @FnkDctr "which photo are you referring to?" Cripes! Again! You're so stupid you don't even recognize your own wrtiting! Your the one who said "The photos say it wasnt even airplane parts", asshole! Which it doesn't say anywhere! "Not one, thanks" Most of them. You're welcome. Again. "I have, about 20 pages back" HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa!!!!! Yeah! "NIST is wrong!". Great fucking rebuttal!! HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa!!!!! "When havent you?" Because it's your claim, dickhead!
  • @FnkDctr "Thats a lie."

    How is it a lie?

    "Thats where it was found according to official FBI documents"

    Now THAT'S a lie!

    Where was the FDR for FL 77 found?

    I think that's 20 times now I have asked.

    What are you afraid of?

  • @cantonear1968

    Dayum!! You sure do get around these 911 pages. I'm curious of something. Are you guys paid by the post or by the pages you visit? But, I know it can't be by the amount of people you convince. We both know that's nada...Ok, as you were...

  • @muzicmaker2001 Muzak!

    I've missed you!

    Tell me something: how many planes hit the WTC Towers?

    On 9/11?

    2001?

    Toodles!

  • @FnkDctr Where was the FDR for FL 77 found?

  • @cantonear1968 "Where was the FDR found for FL 77?"

    Typical debunker tactic.

    You cant answer questions that you CANNOT DEBUNK, SO YOU SPAM THE SAME QUESTION OVER AND OVER?

    EXPLAIN WTC 7 FREE FALL THROUGH THE PATH OF GREATEST RESISTANCE

    OVER 1400 PROFESSIONALS SAY YOU ARE FULL OF SHIT AND CANNOT DEFY SCIENCE

    SHOW ME ONE SCIENTIST WHO SUPPORTS YOUR BULLSHIT.

    Owned again

    Every time I come here I own this cantonear1986 asshole and he runs then tries to ask questions or lie

  • @JonnyPitiful Well, look who just showed up out of the blue!

    Funny. I never see Jonny anywhere else but on sites where I'm pantsing Fuckhead Dctr!

    LOL!

    Dctr....er....I mean Jonny, you couldn't OWN a wet dream!

    But make sure you "thumbs up" some other comments by yourself...er...I mean Fuckhead Dctr. It seems to mean something to you...er...I mean the both of you!

    HaHaHaHaHa!

  • @cantonear1968 "I never see Jonny anywhere" Because you dont debate on real 911 videos you disinformant. "Fuckhead Dctr!" Nice debate "Dctr....er....I mean Jonny, you couldn't OWN a wet dream!" Nice debate "..er...I mean Fuckhead Dctr" Nice debate "HaHaHaHaHa!" Way to answer questions in a debate. We all can see who the uneducated loser is. Thanks for proving what an immature, uneducated waste of life you are.
  • @JonnyPitiful "Way to answer questions in a debate."

    I'm sorry, but was there a question in your post? You seemed too busy cheerleading for yourself...er...I mean Fuckhead Dctr.

  • @FnkDctr I was not talking about building 7, douchebag. I was meaning the towers. THEY did not fall at free-fall speed

  • @ryanmacdaddy1000 and I was talking about WTC 7, which did fall at free fall speed.

    The twin towers were exploded outwards. Many videos with blast points below the collapse and eye witnesses can be found on the web.

  • why would they report something that hadnt happened? why did she get cut off? Why are you trying so hard to debunk facts? As of today, I still dont know ONE SINGLE person who believes one word of the official story. I have asked cops army and even my lawyer about 911 they all say it was an inside job. In fact, you are the only person on planet earth who believes the bullshit fed to us by the official" story. Debunk that shill.

  • Anyone who thinks the BBC would be informed ahead of time are seriously stupid or mental cases.

  • @ModerateMartian Exactly!

  • Nothing suspicious about anything on 9/11 friends. Our system wouldn't create a horror of shocking awe against the finacial and military sector on live TV to trick us into anything nefarious, like waging wars abroad and against their own citenzens here at home, would they?

    Just a min. someone"s banging on the door...

    be right baaaaaaaaahhhhh.....

    ....(static)....

  • Oh whatever I was to reply to umm 9/11 intercepted movie by pilots for 9/11 truth.

    or i could just go "Flight 77 had impossible steering by any human pilot" James Cagney.

    In a debunkers mind a written down quote is solid lol.

  • @RickAstley56 Pilots for 911 truth huh?

    So, the boys say that this 270 degree turn at 500 mph is "impossible"?

    Are these the same boys who think Fl 77 pulled a 35 G upward maneuver to fly over the Pentagon!!??

    35 G's???

    That's who you're quoting?

  • @cantonear1968 On the right path i guess no video evidence of a plane Lol they never said that and yeah it is impossible

  • @RickAstley56 Could you try adding some punctuation to you sentences because your last one was incoherent?

    What "right path"? Why do you think there is no evidence of a plane? What are you talking about?

    Yes. The boys at PFFT offered the theory that the Pentagon was actually hit by a missile dropped from a C-130 (offered no evidence of this). They believed that FL 77 flew towards the Pentagon, as the witnesses saw, but then pulled up at the last second and flew over the Pentagon ..

  • @cantonear1968 They did not say that once in the full movie.

    How blind can you be. PNAC even says America needs a new pearl harbour bomb sniffing dogs not present larry silverstein and the mayor not in building 7 when scheduled to be and fighter jets out on training all on the same day. Steven emerson admitting the fbi said they need another 9/11 every time there is a terror attack bills get passed taking away all your rights introducing homeland security. just like hittler.

  • @RickAstley56 Is that the extent of your research? One movie?

    They've made this claim on their website, you idiot! And it shows how idiotic the people are that you are laying your faith in!

    Where the fuck does that leave you?

    You don't even know what PNAC was about, do you?

    Why would the mayor be in WTC 7? Or Silverstein? You can't even get straight the bullshit claims of the truth movement!

    The fighter jets on training {gee. Fighters training. imagine that!] were they taken ....

  • @cantonear1968 You clearly never watched the full barry jennings interview. Me explaining this to you is rather pointless obama signed NDAA yesterday. It will be obvious this year. Yeah Project for the new american centuary rebuilding America even says new pearl harbour needed.

  • @RickAstley56

    watch?v=O1z9rUsKpJk

    Do not ever lie to yourself and think you know more about this subject than I do!

    And once again, what does the PNAC actually say? You like to quote one line out of it enough. Perhaps you should try to find out what the document is actually advocating.

  • @cantonear1968 "@RickAstley56

    watch?v=O1z9rUsKpJk

    Do not ever lie to yourself and think you know more about this subject than I do!"

    RKOwens, are you really that fucking retarded to tell this fake profile you spam on every one of your videos isnt you? What a fucking MORON.

    By the way, you yourself said YOU CANT POST YOUTUBE VIDEOS AS EVIDENCE.

    Just admitted defeat again.

    Destroying you on every video you posted you disinformant NWO crack head.

    LOL owned again bitch

  • @FnkDctr "YOU CANT POST YOUTUBE VIDEOS AS EVIDENCE."

    Nope, as with everything else, you got it wrong again.

    And if you bothered to look, you would see that Rick asked me if I had seen the Barry Jennings interview. I provided a Barry Jennings interview. You should try lookin at it.

    Now, I don't have a problem with someone using a video as reference FOR their argument. What I don't accept is someone using a video IN PLACE OF their argument.

  • @FnkDctr If your limited education doesn't allow you to understand the difference, then you truly are the fat kid on the short bus with the helmet on I think you are!

  • @FnkDctr "no need to assume personal attacks."

    Ha!

    Sorry if this is becoming a little too much for you! I thought you had a set of balls that could take it!

    I can see I was wrong!

    LOL!

    Fucking Pussy!

  • @cantonear1968 In my country americans are sterotyped as dumb has some truth if you are willing to sell away your rights for something that killed 68 people in 2007 compared to 450,000 by coronary heart disease then yes.

  • @RickAstley56 I have no idea what you are talking about, nor do I think I'll find it interesting enough to bother finding out.

  • @RickAstley56 ....away from bases that had fighters on scramble orders leaving them short?

    NO!

    Who the fuck is Steve Emerson and why do I care what he says?

    Do you have anything you can prove? I see you've given up on Barry Jennings after being called out on that!

  • @RickAstley56 ...(no one saw this). The maneuver at the speed the plane was doing at the point they say it happened would have been a 34 G climb!

    These are the guys you are going to for information?

    Ha!

  • @cantonear1968 No because your claim about being caught in wtc1s collapse is retarded s that wouldnt cause an explosion from underneath you blowing you backwards. Steven emerson worked on foreign policy back then. Also the dead people in wtc7 must be investigated.

  • @RickAstley56 "that wouldnt cause an explosion from underneath you "

    Unless of course you had tons of debris impacting the building from all sides, pushing into the lobby and, ultimately, the stairwell Jennings and Hess were on, just ironically, at 10:28 when WTC 1 collapsed!

    "Also the dead people in wtc7 must be investigated"

    Which would be what? You mean the dead people Jennings "felt like" he was stepping over but never actually saw?

  • @RickAstley56 "Steven emerson"

    Now, before I go down this rabbit hole, you're going to have to link me directly to Emerson's statement and whole statement. Here's why:

    there's a truther with a blog who listed the top 9 9/11 stories of the year. One was Paul Simon singing The Sound of Silence instead of Bridge Over Troubled Water. In true truther reasoning, he concluded that Simon chose this song as a representation of the "Silence" of 9/11!

  • @RickAstley56 So, as you can see, before I waste time on Emerson, I want to know exactly what he said as opposed to the fucked up spin truthers put on everything.

  • @cantonear1968 "I heard it repeatedly after the world trade centre 93 bombing by saying they didn't kill enough people it wasn't said by militants it was said by FBI agents! They didn't say because they wanted more blood but they understood that it would take more blood in order to get the government to react and now I'm hearing other FBI agents and other officials saying Steve we are gonna need another 9/11."

    It's in 9/11 zero hour part 4 6:20 mins. I'm done I can sleep tonight.

  • @RickAstley56 And exactly what does that mean? Are you somehow suggesting that FBI agents are "in on it"? Based on one quote? Which most likely means that Americans have once again become complacent and only react to major catastrophes?

    This is the height of your "evidence"?

  • @RickAstley56 The reason why the 1993 WTC bomb our FBI failed, was because they didnt place it close enough to the pillar to create the building to collapse.

    OKC bombing had multiple inside the building, and the truck wasnt even filled with cow shit.

    3 bombs for OKC,

    9/11 was a very good show. Demolitions like OKC to make sure it didnt fail like 1993, and airplanes to increase national security and take away our rights.

    False flag wars 101.

  • @FnkDctr "take away our rights."

    - America is one of the most free countries in the world. If you think you have no rights you should educate yourself about countries other than the US.

    Americans have it good compared to the rest of the world. Yet truthers talk as if they are living in a grim, dictatorship or police state where they are under control from the evil government.. - all because of 9/11.

    It's a fantasy.

  • @markh1011 I dont care about other countries. Irrelevant information to cover the fact NDAA takes away our rights as United States citizens.

    Explain to me how being detained without reason, explanation, or the right to a lawyer is considered FREEDOM?

    Are you that stupid mark? Do you really think that comparing our new laws to the freedoms of other countries justifies the new laws that take away our freedom?

    Ignorant horrible comparison from an obvious uneducated troll.

  • @markh1011 Whats next mark? Since 6 million people died in WW2, its ok that we only lost thousands in the middle east?

    Since Africa has more people with AIDS, we shouldn't worry about it in America?

    Comparing yourself to the less fortunate countries only shows the low standards you dumbed down Americans are used to.

    I'm not a truther you uneducated child, I'm a Freedomer if you want to label me. Because I stand behind the constitution. Maybe you should read it some time idiot.

  • @FnkDctr "Comparing yourself to the less fortunate countries only shows the low " - No you twit it was to show you an actual country where there isn't much freedom. Learn about China, North Korea, the post Soviet states. You have it so good in America but are ignorant about the rest of the world so you don't realise and instead pretend you're living in a police state dictatorship where you can't do anything...

  • @markh1011 Hey mark, why compare ourselves to other nations when we live according to the rules created over 200 years ago by our founding fathers in a piece of paper called.. THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

    They included rules and laws so we DIDNT HAVE TO LIVE LIKE OTHER NATIONS.

    Thats like going back to the stone age and saying, well its not so bad, bears sleep in caves.

    You are one stupid troll. Just shut up mark. You look more stupid every comment kid.

  • @markh1011 "I explained to you why the comparison was needed. Did you fail to understand or do you just choose not to read some posts?"

    You didnt explain, besides I might have missed your posts since 90% is copy and paste nonsense and youtube seems to mark you as spam often.

    "A great display of missing/avoiding the point."

    Thats all you have done, answer one question please RKOwens you disinformant crack head

  • @FnkDctr "You didnt explain, besides I might have missed your posts" - Oh yeah it's the internets fault... I understand. The internet is the reason why you respond to my posts but don't read the words in them. got it.

    "Thats all you have done" - I made one simple point that you avoided like the plague and ranted on about irrelevant things like bears and cavemen! haha

  • @FnkDctr "Thats like going back to the stone age and saying, well its not so bad, bears sleep in caves." - wow. lol yeah it's just like that!

    "You are one stupid troll." - No I'm here debating the point and trying to educate you.

    "You look more stupid every comment kid."

    - Pretty funny after your awesome bear analogy...

  • @markh1011 My bear analogy was fantastic because it shows the neanderthal brain you attempt to debate with vs an educated person with facts.

    What facts have you brought? Nothing but name calling and subject change.

    I asked you many times over troll.

    Why is GITMO still open? Why are we sending spies into Iran? Why did you allow Obama to pass NDAA? Why was an innocent man detained and tortured for 10 years at GITMO? You do realize we can be held under NDAA right?

    Troll more kid

  • @FnkDctr "My bear analogy was fantastic" - No it showed that you either are unable to understand simple things or you thought an irrelevant analogy was a good idea.

    "What facts have you brought?" - Supporting my point. Lets go back to the start because you are easily confused. My point was that many truthers like to pretend they are living in an evil dictatorship with no rights due to 9/11. This is just nonsense. From there you wanted to talk about bears n stuff..

  • @markh1011 You are comparing one of the richest nations in the world to the conditions of 3rd world countries like they are the same. My analogy was to bring a light to your small closed mind.

    ""What facts have you brought?" - Supporting my point."

    You just trolled again kid, no facts to offer?

  • @FnkDctr "You are comparing one of the richest nations in the world to the conditions of 3rd world countries" - No moron China, North Korea, the ex Soviet states are not 3rd world countries.

    "like they are the same" - They're not the same twit! That's my point! lol

    "You just trolled again kid, "

    - No I responded to your nonsense and had to explain (again) something very simple because you couldn't grasp it. You still aren't getting it...

  • @markh1011 "No moron China, North Korea, the ex Soviet states are not 3rd world countries." Maybe 100 years ago idiot. "We've never met fool" How do you know? "I made one simple point that" was wrong and I have proven it with facts 4 times now. "You still aren't getting it..." getting what? your opinion? bring some facts or stop trolling RKOwens. "I am not who you think I am. "no I am " "RKOwens." Gotcha
  • @FnkDctr "Nothing but name calling" - Actually you have been doing more of the name calling.

    "and subject change" - Actually you seem to be leading that one as well.

    "I asked you many times over troll.

    Why is GITMO still open?" - Actually you only asked me that once .. but accuracy (relevance, facts) clearly isn't ins't your strong point.

    "Why are we sending spies into Iran?" - So your still desperately trying to get away from my very simple point? Got it.