Added: 3 years ago
From: businka1
Views: 114,028
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,200)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • right is on the side of workers (90% of population), not elite. and battle between workers and elite is the oldest battle on this planet. even Jesus Christ said: "It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God".

    capitalism go to hell.

  • @DeejayBeStabdziu

    Russia didn't have capitalism before 1917. It has a commune system. Most people were farmers who worked together. Russia produced 2/3 of the world's food supply while it's farmers only worked 8 months out of the year. The rest of the time they were writing poetry and music. "Capitalism" arose from England (ruled by the Jewish Rothschilds) and their industrial revolution which forced people into factories.

    Capitalism/Communism, both parasitic Jewish scams.

  • Comment removed

  • I want to learn russian so bad.

  • Comment removed

  • @supertuga98 its not insulting its a propaganda song to rally the soldiers but its epic!

  • 3:08 300 soviets

  • @Ioannhsmiro THIS IS RUSSIA!!!!

  • Can anyone send me the cartoon pic of the two-headed bird?

  • @MrBoyindahood Do a Google search for "russian eagle"

  • this is an insulting song

    fuck you comunists!!!!

  • @supertuga98 Typical brainwashed American

  • @supertuga98 it's supposed to be singed by the regular peasants of Russia, it's not like they wanted communism, it's about the freedom they wanted from the tsar

  • @supertuga98 Capitalist of shit.

  • Soviet rock!

  • "sometimes to protect something, you have to destroy it" ~ lenin

  • Did they realize that the Tsar was trying to PROTECT his people from Germany? What the fuck do you think he was doing? I'm not a communist, I'm a COMMUNEist, but why the sweet fuck should I let someone own part of my property that dosen't even work? You tell me that. By time Stalin was in there Russia was screwed, Stalin fucked Russia and gave it a bad name.

  • @vladpros2000 Excuse my langauge.

  • The only thing the Soviet Union was good at was killing it's own people.

  • @ElemixZero

    Well they were good at making decent music,parades and cutting edge technologies.

  • @BrettKeaneDotCon So were the Nazis.

  • @ElemixZero

    Indeed.

  • They where good at killing Nazis too which is something Europe and the rest of the world should be damn happy about. Had the USSR fallen to Hitler´s murderous regime they could very well have won enough time to develop the A-Bomb or maybe even beat the tiny armies of Britain and the USA.

  • @ma82fo The Nazis weren't as "murderous" as you may think. Sure they may have started the war but if the Nazis wouldn't start it the USSR would. Although I'm no sure if the Nazis were working on nuclear bombs so I dunno about that.

  • @ElemixZero

    Germany had a advanced nuclear program and only the timely brittish sabotage of a factory producing heavy water in occupied Norway and the disruption caused by allied bombings in Germany made them fail to get in before the Americans.

  • i love the russian empire and the USSR, because they both were so different, russia has benefitted from both of them (of course suffered tremendously too)

  • Does every video with music have to turn into a bloody political discussion? Just shut up and enjoy the music, even if that means ignoring it's true purpose.

  • Everyone that talks crap about Russia and Russians can eat shit and die..

    That civil war was inevitable.. :(

    As a Greek I heard many stories about that huge confict..

    I never took a side... Very limited information..

  • @Sid7Vicious

    The civil war was not inevitable, Jews planned it for many decades. Russia was the wealthiest empire and the Jewish, sodomite empire down as "British Empire" wanted to destroy it.

  • All Hail Mother Russia!

    Hoorah! Hoorah! Hoorah!

  • @SpetsnazOfficer TROLL!

  • Amazing song, amazing video!!!

  • @TossTheTV America (pre civil war), the Tsars’ Russia, and Germany where strong allies. All three where destroyed by Empire and divided into “capitalist/ communist/ socialist for the uprising of the military industrial war machine, which robs the people of the world of liberty, making us mere communities.

  • @TossTheTV

    There weren't enough lakes on Eastern front for Germans to keep drowning all the Russian POWs in during WWI.

    As for fiercely loyal to the czar, once he moved to the front and demonstrated to everyone how bad of a general AND a public speaker he was, the army quickly got over its loyalty to the Godsent One.

  • @businka1

    If the army got over their loyalty to the Czar, why did the Bolsheviks censor his resignation letter to the army? Your claims are nothing assumptions to justify YOUR loyalty to a murderous, in-human system called Communism, which was designed by the vilest, most psychopathic Talmudic Jews the world had to offer.

    The truth is that while WWII was happening, Stalin was also killing as many of his own people as possible. 20 million civilians died, not only due to the Nazi advancements.

  • Go to wikipedia:

    /List_of_inventors

    and also

    /Timeline_of_Russian_invention­s_and_technology_records#1910s

    youtube: "Anthony Sutton" and listen to his lectures on the USSR. Soviet Union couldn't even produce a single car that wasn't purchased abroad. Soviet trucks run on 1930s American technology.

    The idea that USSR took Russia up in technology and modernization is a myth. All it did was murder millions of people and create a cold-war so the Zionists could better enslave the whole world.

  • Czarist Russia in 1900-1917 Inventions/technology/science wise, was only behind Germany (the most advanced nation in the world) and possibly England/France, as Russia was only modern in St Petersburg & Moscow, not the whole country like in western Europe. However as a result of the commune serf system, the average Russian enjoyed a quality of life much higher than the average European.

    While Americans were working to death in NY factories, Russians were only farming 8 months out of the year.

  • @businka1 The Russians didn´t abandoned the Czar because he was a "bad speaker" or a poor general for that matter. They only did so after 3 hard years,barley no food,a lot of war exhaustion and finally after being ordered to shoot down their own people. Even if tossthetv is an a*shole who lies, dosen´t make it ok for everyone to lie so please stop

  • @ohnoshedidntw8 I don't really see why you are arguing with me. Being a bad general is a kind of thing that usually leads to 3 years of war and no food.

  • @businka1 I´m not arguing, I just don´t think it´s okay to oversimplify historical events.

  • @businka1 Russian czar was a mythical and a revered figure. Even when things were going terribly wrong, people attributed them either to outside forces or to incompetent local politicians/commanders. Czar taking personal control of the army had made a huge dent in these assumptions.

  • @TossTheTV

    we were so under prepared during ww2 we captured Berlin at least 8 months ahead of the expected time it would have taken the allies to arrive! And how can you be so loyal to immediately throw down your weapons and join your sworn enemy? Communism is what we wanted what we strived for! And your stats on food production are all lies, if it wasnt for the soviets the whole country would have starved! What was done benefited everyone not the few!.

  • @TossTheTV your absolutely my friend I am sorry that your comment got so many dislikes :(

  • @TossTheTV Are you still believing that there are good guys and bad guys in the history of man?

    If you are then i can only assume that you are either stupid or that you know nothing of the world

  • @fucktheblackkids

    Until you discover evil you take good for granted. Your Jewish education has taught you "moral relativism". You can "think" what your programming has taught you. That does not diminish the facts that I hold.

    Russian serfs were free under the Czar. They only farmed 8 months of the year and still produced 2/3 of the world's food supply. Western European and American "middle" (and lower) classes were utter slaves with shit living conditions and no free time.

  • @fucktheblackkids The two don't mutually exclude each other. TossTheTV aka TossTheSalad is both stupid AND ignorant of world history.

  • @TheEmperorHasSpoken

    Keep playing your fucking video games and keep your mouth shut. You believe what you learn in school and on television. That is all Zionist propaganda. USSR was a Jewish project and destroyed Russia and her people.

    "We should turn Her (Russia) into a desert populated with white Niggers" - Leon Trotsky aka Lev Bronstein

  • @TossTheTV We get it. You're upset because the USSR wiped out your poor little Nazi Germany. Hitler should've known "Those who know nothing of history are doomed to repeat it." Poor moron didn't read up on Napoleon. Pathetic. Lesson of the Day: Don't fuck with people you're obviously weaker than.

  • @TheEmperorHasSpoken

    Napoleon was the Zionist's (Jews headed out of England) first attempt to conquer Europe. They failed thanks to Czarist Russia. Czar Nicholas II was the most powerful man in the world, and also the most anti-Zionist. Russia had the largest gold supply, and produced 2/3 of the world's food supply. By 1920s USSR was starving because the Talmudic Jews (also known as the Bolsheviks) killed so many millions of Christian Russians. Cremieux = Protocols of Zion

  • @TossTheTV Look at that. You're Christian AND evil. Can't say those two together are a surprise. In fact those two words are very common when put together...

  • @TheEmperorHasSpoken

    Who said I'm Christian, or evil? Stop bullshitting me you egotistical troll. You have a lot to learn but you're too busy trying to show how smart you are. We both know you know nothing so please stop wasting my time.

    Talmudic Jews hate all goyim! But they hate Christians, especially Orthodox Christians the most. They killed Russia's priests and monks and turned Churches into horse stables and barns before they started killing ordinary people.

  • @TossTheTV

    No. the USSR was starving because Stalin decided to collectivize all the farms and the farmers got pissed so they burned all their crops and killed all their livestock. After a few years of starvation, agriculture recovered fairly quickly due to the collectivization of farms and new farm equipment Stalin employed in order to have Russia industrialize.

  • @g0eme

    READ MY LIPS Zionist mind control victim. Russia produced 2/3 of the >> world's << food supply prior to 1917, and was the wealthiest nation in the world (naturally as it's the largest with the most resources). Tsar Nicholas Romanov II had the most gold, so the Jews in NY and London (including Rothschild and the English Monarchy itself) conspired to take it down through WWI + revolution, and steal the wealth. Rockefeller took all of Russia's gold by 1920!!

    USSR = slavery & death.

  • @TossTheTV If it was good noone would join in the revolutionari forces. and it's completely natural to be weak after the revolution and the anti-revolutionery war with england and France. Still the soviets produced many inovations, were best in science, were known and feared, not for the military power, but the power of mind, scientific discoveries and researches, the power of the people and makeing a society against capitalism witch proved to be better.

  • @TossTheTV Even so poorly equipped the soldiers of the red army fought harder, prouder, and more dedicatedly than- dare I say- any other military force in existence- with no food, clean water, or even functioning weapons and ammunition- the fought bravely against insurmountable odds... and came out- victorious. I think that counts for something. Even though the soviet government had seemingly endless flaws, its people pulled through. And they were happier and more patriotic than under any tsar.

  • @TheAmazingRusski

    They were definitely more sheep like, they were not happier under the USSR.

    Under the Czar, Russians had the best quality of life in the western world. While Europeans were working to death in factories or begging on the streets for food, Russian serfs were taking 4 months out of the year to paint or read poetry.The USSR was a massive heist by the Jews, and if you disagreed, you got a bullet in the head or a 10 year gulag sentence. Those are the facts.

  • @TossTheTV Monarchist slime

  • @yaik7a

    Communist = brainwashed quasi-Jew

  • @TossTheTV Are you implying that Communism which has atheistic principals is religious and some how connected to Judaism? Are you fucking retarded?

  • @yaik7a He is retarted LOL

  • @yaik7a

    It's you who is a fool. You're using Communist propaganda to analyze Communism, that is like analyzing history using solely the bible, or analyzing a corporation's actions based on their press releases. You know nothing except what your text books told you-which were written by those who killed 60+ million Russians.

    Jewry views itself collectively as god. In that way it is Atheism aka Satanism. But they still human sacrifice to Moloch & Eloheim.

  • Karl Marx based the Communist Manifesto on the Talmud. Communism is secretly called Jewish utopia. It is a scam for the stupid goyim to give up their sovereignty so the Jews can run the world and murder as many people as they wish.

    Open your eyes. Russia had no central bank and the largest gold supply in the world. The Jews caused a revolution, then Rockefeller came in and took all the gold. The biggest heist of all time, if you disagree with communism at all you went to the gulag.

  • @TossTheTV

    The Czarist Army in WW1 was a huge mob of poorly educated and equipped peseants who where led by horrible commanders (except Brusilov). The Red Army was much better equipped in 1941 and only because of the Purges and Stalins refusal to admit that Germany was the threat made them loose horribly during 1941 and early 1942. By late 1942 the Red Army was the strongest and best equipped Army in the world and could have crushed the 'invincible' Wehrmacht on it´s own.

  • Keep talking Bolshevik mind slave... My grandfather is a veteran of WW2 and has worked with veterans of the great war for over 15 years, I have spoken to many of them. Soviet troops were so wonderfully equipped that my grandfather who was wounded twice, once in Stalingrad, said they would have lost the war if it wasn't for American equipment (lend-lease program).

    Russia died with the Czar. Whether it comes back to life depends on how long Russians continue to identify with their rapist.

  • @TossTheTV your a complete dumbass. guess who won ww2.. the soviets. the life under the czar was worse do some reaserch you impirialist basterd

  • @NJT97

    oo some fucking kid called me a dumbass, it means a lot..

    Don't be a sucker, look into history yourself. Communism is 100% Jewish. They murdered tens of millions of Russians for no other reason than to consolidate their power over the "goyim".

    My grandfather told me what life was like for him in the 30s and 40s, and what it was like for his father PRIOR to the revolution.

    Russians were the freest people in Europe under the Czar, in the USSR they were all total slaves.

  • @TossTheTV its true stalin and lenin put a very bad name to communism but look at china. they could have handeled it a lot differently. the russians revolted againsed the czar because they were tired of living like slaves. russia is not a good example of communism. however china and vietnam are

  • @NJT97 You cant blame Lenin for not being perfect, he was the first one to try bringing in communism on such a large scale. Stalin was bad he could have done so much good but fucked the soviet system up so badly instead

  • Youtube: juri lina

    Watch his documentaries about the Jewish side of the USSR.

    Communism is a Jewish scam to rule over gentiles and murder them with no recourse. USSR killed 100 million Russians and ruined many more lives. Either start to accept the truth or you can look forward to the same treatment by the Jew World Order in the not too distant future.

  • Russians had the best living standards in Europe under Romanov because it was free of Jew bankers. Under the czar every village was self-sufficient, it was a true "commune" system. People loved Romanovs, except the subversive Jews. When they caused the revolution, it became hell on earth. ~100 million Slavic (white) people were slaughtered by the psychopathic secret police (Cheka/KGB) in the lifespan of the USSR.

    Communism is a Jewish scam to take control, it's based on their Talmud.

  • @TossTheTV actualy the italians where badly prepared the ussr was more prepared than the german army read it up on the battle of stalingrad

  • perfect workout song!!!!

  • This makes me want to destroy imperial russia.

  • what is this cartoon called?

  • @3man75 It's a combination of about 4 old Soviet cartoons.

  • @businka1

    which one's? they look like some cuban cartoon's like el peidio valdez

  • @businka1 can you put in description i would like to see some in more detail.

  • @businka1 Where can we find these?

  • @businka1 and what would those 4 be ?

  • @EspressoFan4Life Go fuck a pig

  • Excellent song. No other country can quite match the patriotic feel of Soviet music.

  • I admire the idealism of the communists

  • @thatkamikid Soviet Union is about as far from Communism as it gets.

  • About communism, capitalism and other economic policy generalizations

    is impossible to be 100% good, @Trillios said that for communism to work perfectly, 100% of the population must be communist, I say that this applies to any kind of politics and economics, and still we will be subject to go through storms, Just look at current global situation,

    shall be if the world was a Communistwe would be going through this crisis?

    probably not, but surely we could be facing another kind of crisis

  • 0:55 The "Read" Army? Harry Read has an army?

  • @Stargate404 COD:MW is based on a Secret plan of Harry Read :P

  • Communism always fails because it promises more than it can produce, then the country has to work the lower classes to death and starve them wage and price caps in order to just keep the country running and it leads to pollution, destruction of inferstruction and millions of deaths, everytime its been tried. And dont say that the USSR wasnt Communist, it was forged on Communist ideals and however it was lead was the product of those ideals.

  • @GermanConquistador08 well then i should be able to make a cannon with bread, the ideal is to make cannon but since i have tried this several times and failed, it must be so that its impossible to make a cannon. thats what you sound to me, or this is the way you think, and Marx and to some extent Lenin where horrible communists, but to get everything perfect one most try and fail, creating a communist country is hard as you owuld need 100% of the population to be communist

  • @Trillios "but to get everything perfect one most try and fail, creating a communist country is hard as you owuld need 100% of the population to be communist" - Which is what every communist nation has tried to do, mostly through cohersion by force. Any ideology that requires the entire nation to be a particular ideology to function is NOT a function ideology. Also, the cannon and bread anology makes nosense, more its making a cannon out of tinfoil than more plauislbe metals.

  • @GermanConquistador08 and the USSR wasent communist, it was an attempt, that failed and that is why you shouldnt make cannons out of bread

  • I wish I could sing this

  • The result of the communist: 100 millions of dead! Long life to the democraty and the liberty!

  • @Jutt007 The capitalists and imperialist have killed way more people than the Soviets. Plus Stalin, who is responsible for most of the deaths you are talking about, was in no way a true communist.

  • @Jutt007

    How many have died in Africa as a direct result of colonialism/imperialism/capita­lism ? Also the number of 100 million is not correct. It was not communism´s fault that Stalin corrupted what Lenin had tried to institute by adopting State Capitalism nor is it communism´s fault that the Fascists that ruled in Germany instigated a War of Annihilation against the USSR which was the main factor leading to the 25 million dead Soviet Citizens.

  • @Jutt007 100 million? This number is hilarious. Officially known that because of the repressions USSR lost 0.3% of its population. Your propaganda will not work on adults, my dear fascist scum.

  • @Jutt007

    Pure communism is more democratic then your useless representative "democracy" where 49% of the population which could count for millions will always lose!

  • imagine a world communism, everyone working for eachother.

    imagine a government spanning the world, sending excesses to places in need of.

    imagine a world without hunger, where everyone has a job, and everyone has what he needs.

    THAT is the communism utopia we believe in.

  • @Rhonion

    It is not utopia. World's future is socialism, and probably communism.

  • @PuetvaPL the way it's looking, the world's future will mainly be fire and death

  • @Rhonion well Utopia sucks, but Utopia is fecking great, GO UTOPIA!!!

  • @Trillios if you don't have anything smart to say, don't say anything

  • @Rhonion you have to be smart to figure that out, very few people know that heaven is hell but id rather be in heaven than hell, if that makes any sense at all

  • @Trillios you believe heaven is hell, yet you prefer one over the other, even though they're the same?

    no, it doesn't take a smart person to know your comment doesn't make any sense at all

  • @Rhonion think about it closely, people complain about that its to much work, but if you didnt work for what you get it becomes boring... but yeah communism rules..... and i agree my comment dosent make sense... well it does a bit but doubt you are any smarter, its hard to explain but.... well communism rules, screw death

  • They killed the Nazi scum, drove them back into their rat holes and slaughtered them. Nice job Soviets! :)

  • Epic. This really inspires people. Thumbs up if you felt motivated listening to this

  • Original video came from ?

  • @MrAke95 read desc....

  • CCCP щилл Яисе соон.

  • товарищи советских людей привет привет от Аргентины!

  • KILL ALL REDS!!!

  • @TheAmericanDefender I didnt know that rednecks know how to use the internet

  • @UniversalPshil I didn't know that stupid pieces of shit knew how to either.

  • @TheAmericanDefender Then stop demeaning yourself

  • @TheAmericanDefender Good sir everyone knows that the best way to defeat communism is with knowledge, and not with sheer force. We would be quickly overpowered in matter of seconds in hand to hand combat there is no denying that. So when constructing a sentence try being as grammatically perfect as possible when trying to prove a point against a bunch of brainwashed hippies from Europe. No caps lock.

    Kill all reds!

  • @SackFulloApplez1993 The communists would have taken power a long time ago if they could overpower you "in matter of seconds".

    If you are an american and you sincerely believe that the communists can take the power whenever they want, then you are paranoid, completely out of touch with reality, extremely lonley and potentially dangerous.

  • @marcus8374 Those are some strong claims for a man that doesn't even know who I am or what I believe in. I was referring to a hand to hand battle against the evil red scum with sheer numbers "mano a mano" if you will. If it weren't for our superior weapons the world would be taken over by your communist utopia. Remember brains beats brawn any day. I was also referring to the times when the Soviet Union was in power in case you were mistaken.

  • @SackFulloApplez1993 First you said "defeat them with knowledge", now you say "defeat them with firepower". Pick one!

    You spoke of the past as if it was the present so i can't realy be blamed for that misstake. The west would have lost a conventional war against the east back then, but since both sides had nuclear weapons a conventional war was impossible.

    If you think the communists can take power whenever they want in this day and age, then those assumptions are probably correct.

  • @marcus8374 I'm confused now.

  • @SackFulloApplez1993 i don't know why everyone thinks the CCCP was interested in world domination, afaik they didn't try to occupy any lands. they just installed loyal governments in countries nearby, wich is only normal since most of the world was against them.

    and if brain beats brawn, then why are wrestling competitions still popular?

  • @Rhonion They didn't do it directly, hence proxy wars like in Vietnam, Korea, etc.

    As for the wrestling thing, I want you to rethink about what you're saying, and later comeback to me. I think that you might have thought of a legitimate argument, but It just came out wrong.

  • @SackFulloApplez1993 proxy wars.. supporting those who think alike like america does ALL the time?

    about the wrestling: if brain beats brawn, then shouldn't we long have given up on looking at grown men fight for money? watching grown men fight eachother in order to be called the "best" of the world?

  • @Rhonion But in these proxy wars it was the U.S stopping Communism/ Socialism from spreading.

    Wrestling: Alright so guns, bombs, Jets all invented using science, a person has no chance facing against these things, even the most experienced wrestler.

  • @SackFulloApplez1993 indeed, but since wars don't work against ideas they mainly fought their war against communism by making sure of 2 things.

    1) no person in the West knows what communism is

    2) every person in the West knows that communism is bad

    if you don't believe this, just find any person who dislikes communism, and ask him what communism is exactly.

    wrestling: devices of destruction comes closer to brawn than brain, imho.

  • @Rhonion I understand what communism is, and I know that a majority of people have no idea when it comes to economics, and microeconomics. While Communism was a noble cause, but it turned into an unstable and corrupt form of government. 

    "Devices" of destruction comes closer to brawn?

  • @SackFulloApplez1993 it's still a noble cause, that it became unstable and corrupt is just due to the nature of humans, something we will have to change; or are you implying that capitalism isn't corrupt?

    yep. let me clear it up, if it's a device, then it's close to brain. when it's used for war, then it was probably made by brain, abused by brawn. thus, a device of destruction lies closer to brawn than brain

  • @Rhonion Churchill once said that Democracy was the better of the worst of government, or something along those lines. Also capitalism isn't a form of government.

    Devices of destruction is not brawn's, they were contraptions made by scientist's. Just because you see specialized brutes using them don't make them brawn. They were contraptions that required thought, and experimenting ergo they are considered brain.

  • @SackFulloApplez1993 democracy would be ideal, but a true democracy is rather impossible.

    and communism isn't a form of government either, in theory you could have a communist democracy.

    but they are used for things a smart person wouldn't(shouldn't?) dream of doing, thus brawn; you might not agree with my understanding of brawn. but i put everything that is made to purposefully harm another being closer to brawn. because i believe that real smart people don't wanna hurt anyone

  • @Rhonion We'll a Republic's/Parliaments that favors business have always come out on top than countries that focus on social welfare. It's really a matter of how a person want's to live is up for debate.

    Brawn:noun. 1. strong, well-developed muscles. 2. muscular strength. It doesn't matter if you consider them to be whatever it doesn't make it true. You can't also say that no smart person want's to not hurt people, he can't do it using his muscles, because he's weak so he uses a gun= brain.

  • @SackFulloApplez1993 ofcourse those who focuss on social welfare fare worse, they don't draw in the big money, they draw in the ones who need help.

    if he wants to hurt someone, he isn't smart.

    in my opinion "brain over brawn" doesn't equal "thinking over muscle", it equals "common sense over destruction" because as with all sayings, you shouldn't take them literal

  • @Rhonion Bro common, fire arms and bombs were scientific discovery's. The best example I can give would be that movie with Tom cruise when he was the last samurai, and they were fighting against the Japanese army with rifles, and cannons. Then all of the samurai were basically all killed off

  • @SackFulloApplez1993

    Not true, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, all very left wing very welfare states, constantly rank number 1 in almost every aspect of life, including living standards, and live expectancy!

  • @SaloRepublicRSI That's socialism, and I can understand that. Not to be confused with communism which is basically like a fascist rule, without the privilege of owning land, and no way of trying to better yourself because your getting an equal portion regardless. I don't see this system working in America. The conversation really was more based on weather guns are to be considered brains, or brawn's.

  • @SackFulloApplez1993 completely wrong. Communism is not a fascist rule, and "no way of trying to better yourself" is wrong too. Again, the USSR was Leninism/Stalinism. "trying to better yourself" is capitalism, in communism there is no "better" for one individual. "Communism deprives no man of the power to appropriate the products of society, all that is does is to deprive him of the power to subjugate the labor of others by means of such appropriation."

    Read it and weep.

  • @SackFulloApplez1993 The hippies in Europe knows aboout american evil and lies, the bankers have made your debt record high and lazy ill informed americans are still sitting around like it's christmass. The bankers and the bussinessmen don't care if yur pension or your life is destroyed by them, they look after themselves.

    This is why they are trying to make it seem like that "the state can't run anything", americans are so stupid that they think they are better off with corporations.

  • @SackFulloApplez1993 there is no beating communism with knowledge, but you can keep it away with sheer stupidity.

    afterall, the best way to keep away something perfect, is letting no one know it IS perfect

  • @SackFulloApplez1993

    Say what you want but we are not hippies. We actually worked to build up our nations and ensure strenth and stability. What do hippies do!? Nothing.!

    Also we don't do drugs

  • @SovietUnionRedStar Not very efficiently. If you look at the people who are for communism, they are the European hooligans, and in America they are drugged out hippies with dread locks that go around skateboarding all day with there little Che Guevara shirts on listening to Rage Against the Machine.

  • Forgive me if you've already posted this somewhere, but who is performing this?

  • @ProbabilityDiver

    Ivan Baranov Иван Баранов.

    young communist singer.

    mgsofilm.narod.ru/ivan_baranov­.htm

  • what kind of genre would this fall under?

  • @EPICCCP I was thinking about this as well. I suppose "March" is a genre itself. Look it up on wikipedia. This particular rendition sounds a tiny bit metal to me, but I think it's still a march as far as technicalities are concerned.

  • 0:56

    GLORY TO THE READ ARMY

  • Can anyone write to me the lyrics in Russian?But with latin letters please.

  • in soviet russia, bronies of the world unite against two headed Gilda! because friendship is magic.

  • @ddxt301 URA!

  • @ddxt301

    Do you Bronies really have to ruin Soviet Russia jokes, too?

  • If only Marx and Lenin were alive to see communism at its height.

  • @Norman765r Lol, there never was any communism, only Modified Socialism...

  • This video need PONIES!

  • When capitalism and its egoism finally collapse the poor, USSR will rise again.

    Power to the soviets.

  • @tokk87 the people will rise friend, the people will rise, its happening now.

    HASTA LA VICTORIA

  • @tokk87 And what was the USSR? The poor remained poor, and the wealthy bureaucrats lived like kings. Sounds like a fun place to me!

  • @Vengrence The USSR was Leninism/Stalinism. Lenin worked the country based on Marxist ideals. Stalin....didn't. Anyways the USSR was not communist, there has not been a country that was truly communist.

  • @ArTofPvT That's a no true scotsman, though. The same thing can be said for capitalism. We've never had actual capitalism, we have corporatism.

  • no joke i just got goosebumps eerie...long live Vladimir Lenin

  • мне нравиться как "церкви" на "банки" заменили. политкорректные стали комуняки

  • jajajjaajja думать только невежественные не знаю, как умные изменить мир жить Латинской Америки че Altino и коммунисты рады сообщить козыри ПРЕДСТАВЛЕННЫХ E INORANTES jajajajajaj Каллуса и МЕНЯ И ПОЧЕМУ НЕ ДАЕТ молчании.

  • @MsRobinsoncrusoe

    Are you using translation software (badly), high on something, or just an average YouTube user?

  • @businka1 noit just badly, he appears to be using it very very VERY badly, my translation prgram says this is what he said

    "think only the ignorant do not know how smart to change the world live in Latin America, Che Altino and communists are happy to announce trumps SUBMITTED BY E INORANTES"

    again what?

  • @businka1 if ypu gonna say someting in russian most be something communist!

    Bitch

  • @businka1 ..... I think it the correct answer may be: D. All of The Above.

  • well i must agree. i would much rather see a united, peaceful and christian Russian Tsardom. it would be easier to reason with at any rate

  • Comment removed

  • i meant that in the white movement, monarchists were in a minority. Mensheviks were a minority amongst the reds.

  • strange seeing as how the majority of the White Army were moderate socialistsd and democrats. Monarchists were in the minority.

  • @ma82fo Of course they were their positions were everything it was all they knew they were smart enough to realize that if there was no Czar they would have no way of supporting themselves and their family the Bolsheviks didn't care at all about anything they were just a bunch of power hungry monsters they came killed everyone and than took over and caused more death. The Czars may have not been much better but id take Nicolas over Stalin or Lenin any day.

  • who write this lyrics ?

    result is 100,000,000 corpses

  • @ma82fo What makes you think Russia wouldn't have abolished it? They most likely would have but the Bolsheviks had to be the radical idiots they were and come in and kill the Czar and everyone who they deemed was a monarchist. All in all Russia would have been a lot better if the Czar had still been in place during the bloody reign of the USSR. I'm not saying that I still want a Czar nowadays because that wouldn't work at all but it would have been nice if we still had the royal family today.

  • @LEATH0RMAN

    I agree that the result of the revoution was an unfortunate one to say the least. The best would ofc have been if Social Democrats, Liberals and Conservatives had listened to the desperate pleas of their people to rid them of the oppressive C