Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (541)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • beware youtube user megazordman2, he has been posting inflamatory comments about christianity. Please go to his channel youtube dot com slash megazordman2 and report him 10-20 times a day until youtube bans him. Stop letting these people get away with it.

  • Salvation is Faith and Works:

    John 3:36 Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life, but whoever disobeys the Son will not see life, but the wrath of God remains upon him.

  • EVERYTHING the Catholic Church teaches is biblical, The Catholic Church chose the books of The Bible, The Bible is a Catholic Book, you cannot call yourself a christian and be Catholic, all the different sects started after the PROTESTant reformation, if people only knew the stuff that luther said, they would be shocked, All the church fathers were Catholic, they taught everything the Catholic Church teaches today.

  • @hess6wi You writing a few unsubstantiated sentences doesn't make Romanism Biblical. To answer a question like this it must be studied in detail, not just blind statements like you're making. First, go to BEREANBEACON ORG (a website by a former RC priest for 25 years) & read the article posted there called "ARE CATHOLICS CHRISTIAN?" & then type "RICHARD BENNETT ROMAN CATHOLICISM" in the YOUTUBE search box & see the many videos on Romanism by this former priest. Also see our 16 hour series on RC.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • As an Episcopal convert to Roman Catholicism when I was in the Army, I would like to respectfully disagree with your conclusions. Catholicism is after all the largest Christian church on Earth with members in every country on Earth including many persecuted underground Christian martyrs in atheist run countries like China, That would seem to be a fairly good sign God loves us.

  • @Texasjim2007 I like your YT name "Texas Jim" since I'm from Texas too. Anyway, this short 10 minute clip from our 16 hour video series with former Roman Catholic Rob Zins is not the best way to come to a conclusion on this matter. Please keep in mind that just because something is "big" does not make it true (Islam, Hinduism & Buddhism are "big" too). What makes something true is the word of God (the Bible). Please type "LARRY WESSELS ROMAN CATHOLICISM" in the YOUTUBE search box & see series.

  • Comment removed

  • the RCC is not Christian, as it goes blatantly against the instructions of the creator god, YHWH, of the Israelites. The inspired writings, which the Catholic church canonized long ago, is worth reading, and understanding. Once understood, it is more than obvious that the Bible, and the papyl writings, connaot coincide withing the same practice or belief. Obviously you havent understood the Biblical writings, as it clearly give the Creators insight about majorities: never a good thing to be.

  • @Texasjim2007 God loves everyone but He doesn't like it very much when you bow down to mary n pray to the 'saints'

  • Um, there is no god. Just saying. You know, facts and history and all that stuff

  • @BadGroundBand Wow, we don't get many visits from atheists on our videos concerning Roman Catholicism (usually just Romanists & Bible believing Christians fighting here) & that's because the atheists are all over watching our videos on atheism & evolution (please type "LARRY WESSELS ATHEISM" or "LARRY WESSELS EVOLUTION" in the YOUTUBE search box). You might like our newly uploaded YOUTUBE show, "DEBATE: THE HISTORICITY OF JESUS - A REAL PERSON OR NONEXISTENT? WALTER MARTIN VS MADALYN O'HAIR

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @BadGroundBand Well, I don't really debate the existence of Christ, I just believe there's no real proof of his supernatural abilities. I think if we need to believe that there is something bigger than ourselves in order to have morals and the decency to treat each other w/ equal respect despite our personal differences, all one needs to do is simply look at some of the many deep space pictures take by the Hubble telescope. To me, THAT shows why we must be humble and responsible.

  • @BadGroundBand Based on what you're saying it's obvious you believe the Bible is a fictious book & cannot be trusted since, as you know, the Bible is full of "supernatural abilities" not just restricted to Christ (miraculous events are throughout the Old Testament & New Testament). You take the position that "there is something bigger than ourselves" but you deny that the "something bigger than ourselves" could have communicated with the present reality we find ourselves in by way of the Bible.

  • @CAnswersTV My point was that I don't believe he exists at all. The universe is so mind boggling large, our own insignificance is humbling enough. My point also was that god has no basis in fact or reality, and there is NO evidence to prove he exists, other than desert scribblings that have been updated, changed, and selected by people. The bible is fictitious, but it was written for a purpose of control and understanding during, before and after the fall of the roman empire.

  • @BadGroundBand Had Constantine not chosen to become Christian, there very well might not be Christians now

  • @BadGroundBand For an atheist it's interesting why you're here on a religious video concerned with the subject of Roman Catholicism, shouldn't you be out getting drunk somewhere right now? Why are you wasting your time & mine here? Please waste your atheist time somewhere else. For others reading this, to refute what this historically ignorant person is saying type "LARRY WESSELS CHURCH HISTORY" in the YOUTUBE search box & refer also to our 2 websites HISTORYCART COM & BIBLEQUERY COM. Titus 1:9

  • @BadGroundBand If you "don't believe he [God] exists at all" then why are you bothering to watch this "religious" video? Before I became a Christian I didn't waste my time on this stuff at all & I certainly wouldn't have been wasting my time talking to a Christian believer such as myself. Like the old saying goes, "eat, drink & be merry for tomorrow we die" (many of the dead Rock stars really knew how to do that & the soon to be dead ones too). History itself proves you wrong about the Bible.

  • @SANxJONERO, You're getting my opinion whether you like it or not you foul-mouthed sinner.

  • @SANxJONERO, The Roman Antichrist exalteth himself in the Church (of God) against Christ and all that is called God. Protestantism is revived Christianity, not "rehashed Catholicism", and this is something Protestants as well as Papists need to keep in mind, the Reformers were reforming God's Church, not the Roman Church.

  • Comment removed

  • @gtepp031387 You may interested in BEREANBEACON ORG. a website run by a former Roman Catholic priest for 25 years named RICHARD BENNETT (see his many posted videos on Romanism, simply type "RICHARD BENNETT ROMAN CATHOLICISM" in the YOUTUBE search box; particularly check out his videos on Romanist history). Besides his documented material check out our YOUTUBE video "EARLY CHRISTIAN CHURCH HISTORY PROVES ROMAN CATHOLICISM FALSE" & see our website HISTORYCART COM on the early Christian church.

  • THIS FACT!  The Catholic Church has always tried to keep the European as dumb possible. An example of this hiding of truth can be seen in the coverup of the Pedophile Priest and Gays that run the Catholic Church. The Spanish Inquisition, The Crusades, WWI, and WWII, all involve the Catholic Church manipulating, lying to, stealing from, and murdering the people of Europe. WWII is nothing but the Catholic Church and Rothschild using Ashkenazi Khazars(non-Semites/Zionist) for another Crusade.

  • Any person who is intellectually honest, and willing to investigate fully without preconceived conclusions, cannot escape the fact that the Roman Catholic Church is the Church established by Christ. It is the Kingdom of God on earth. By way of example, Blessed John Henry Newman; but such rigorous intellectual honesty is rare these days.

  • @365catholic Your statement here is based on "blind faith" in a phony religious institution - Romanism & a complete ignorance of early church history. First, see our Youtube video "EARLY CHRISTIAN CHURCH HISTORY PROVES ROMAN CATHOLICISM FALSE," next, see our video series entitled, "EARLY CHRISTIAN CHURCH HISTORY," next, see our website HISTORYCART COM, next, see former Romanist priest for 25 years Richard Bennett's website BEREANBEACON ORG & his many posted YOUTUBE videos on Romanist history.

  • @365catholic, Read The Two Babylons by Alexander Hislop and then ask yourself how can Popery being anything other than demoniac worship? The Bible depicts the Roman Church as the Whore of Revelation. Read Revelation Chapters 17 & 18 (Authorised KJV) and see for yourselves. The great Protestant Martin Luther only discovered this fact when he stumbled upon a Bible in Erfurt Library, and after reading the writings of John Wycliffe and Jan Huss. READ THE BIBLE FOR YOURSELVES AND FLEE!

  • @Islandretreat The great city is reffered to in Rev can you tell me where this great city is? Say who gave you your bible by the way?..Thats right the Catholic church.... Martin Luther great..boy if you knew what he taught you would never say that. Tell me about the Jewish priest garb as found in Exodus 28...wow matches perfect word for word with what Rev is describing doesn't it? Hummm......?

  • @gtepp031387, Rome is the City on Seven hills. Jerusalem has five hills. Rome is the city in Revelation. The Roman Catholic Church didn't give us the Bible. The Holy Scriptures are older than the Roman Church, and it was the Universal Church who gave us the Bible, not exclusively the Church of Rome, there was pastors from the Celtic Church in attendance as well as from all over Christendom. That's quite a lie you're peddling? Rome is the enemy of the Bible.

  • Con't: I'm perfectly aware the Jesuits attributed anti-Jewish sentiments to Luther. I'm not trying to offend you my friend, Hislop's book The Two Babyons has 61 woodcut carvings from Babylon, Nineveh, Egypt and Pompeii, which prove Roman Catholicism is Babylonianism. Popery is paganism under a Christian mask, that's why all the "Christian festivals" (Easter, Christmas etc) are pagan dates.....flee my friend!

  • BEHOLD THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH THE ORIGINATOR OF THE BIBLE.

  • @craventref You're poorly informed sir. First, the Roman Catholic Church is NOT the "ORIGINATOR" of the Bible. The scriptures were here long before a Roman cult was created (2 Peter 3:16 cf 1 Timothy 5:18 & 1 Corinthians 9:14, Psalm 119). Next, history itself refutes Romanism, see our Youtube video, "EARLY CHRISTIAN CHURCH HISTORY PROVES ROMAN CATHOLICISM FALSE" & our website HISTORYCART COM & BEREANBEACON ORG. Next, in logic you commit the POST HOC FALLACY with this false "ORIGINATOR" nonsense.

  • This looks old, lets see what this 'Dr.' is doing now and see if he's still an apologist!!! I bet you he's not or he's living a sinful life that's for sure!!

  • @sungmoon1987 Please insert your foot into your mouth. You're totally wrong for making such an asinine comment since you're basing your comment on IGNORANT ASSUMPTIONS made because of your silly biases. Rob Zins is still making speaking engagements around the country & is still running his ministry "A CHRISTIAN WITNESS TO ROMAN CATHOLICISM" (he has authored several books on Romanism also). See our 16 hour series with Rob Zins, type "LARRY WESSELS ROMAN CATHOLICISM" in the YOUTUBE search box.

  • Protestant are the protesters from the catholic church because they hate to be told. They only want their own bible interpretation hence came the sprouts of 35k protestant denomination. Because all of them are proud and does not accept authority that is why division is unstoppable until today. My brother just started his own denomination.

  • The bible is a Roman Catholic book. We gave it to the world.... you poor misguided soul. We consider all Christians brothers and sisters. I'll debate you anytime....any place. In one hour I'll convert you. Bring your bible. I'll explain the scripture to you.

  • @rock6458 The only "poor misguided soul" speaking is you. Dr. Robert Fastiggi of St. Edwards University (Austin, Texas) debated Larry Wessels of Christian Answers for 2 hours on public access TV to a possible viewing audience of 400,000 households on the this subject (see our YOUTUBE videos: DOES ROMAN CATHOLICISM PREACH A DIFFERENT GOSPEL? DEBATE #1 & #2). The Bible is NOT a Roman Catholic book (see our "EARLY CHRISTIAN CHURCH HISTORY PROVES ROMAN CATHOLICISM FALSE" here on YT). 2 Peter 3:16

  • @CAnswersTV

    no you are not right.

    for example im ortodox.

    we are 2000 years old.

    you don``t` have a conection with that True church

    the protestant are from 1517.

  • @rock6458 So your trying to say Roman Catholics created the Hebrew books? riiiight, that makes no sense in histories time line my friend. There is no reason to lie or if you really beleive that you should study more. And I'm not saying that to disrespect you,it just makes no sense. The books were originally in Hebrew and not compiled into a solid 1 book volume until much later then the actual accounts. Around the time of the bibles actual events Catholicism did not even exist.

  • @rock6458 And I gasp at the fact you would even think Roman Catholics would even create such a book when they themselves were persecuting, that means killing, torturing etc anyone who did not agree with their version of it,and there were many cases the Dark ages for example, where people were not even allowed to read ANY bible, including their own corrupted version. And you said your comment a week ago and haven't responded to CAnswers, why? you said "I'll explain the scripture to you" Really?

  • @rock6458 I also find it funny that pretty much all of Catholicism is not biblical yet your suggesting they "gave it to the world", on top of the fact that, THEY(Roman Catholics) had to CHANGE the wording and throw things out of context, which notes that they did not create it. Why would they need to change it if they made it? it would have already been the way THEY(Roman Catholics) have it, but it isn't, the original is in Hebrew, closely translated into the KJV, not the Catholic bible.

  • @rock6458 And the Catholic Bible during it's making used the Latin Vulgate, which contains many errors in translation, but they kept the errors because it validated their Mary Worship with the He/She mistake on Crushing the head of the serpent. Same reason they took out the 2nd Commandment which specifically tells people NOT to worship any idols, statues, ANYTHING, in the likeness of Heaven, the earth below or in the water. In Catholicism Mary is over Jesus and is considered a deity.

  • @rock6458 And Catholics don't even realize the Mother Son worship pagans have and had long before Catholicism existed that has trickled down through the generations form Babylon,this is why the mother always precedes the son to them,always showing pictures of Mary and Jesus as if they even know what Mary looks like or what Jesus looks like.The very image is worshiped by them,statue or picture,bowed down to, kissed, loved,when the bible said specifically not to do that, it's madness.How dare you.

  • @rock6458 And if you were just making things up to provoke people, know that is immature and you need to find something better to do. Like actually reading scripture and trying to be saved rather than not.

  • I do think a Roman Catholic,can begin to see by the grace of God that, what they have learned is false doctrine and begin to move away from that.You are not saved until you have truly given yourself to Jesus Christ and obeying Gods word etc, so how can you if your still worshiping Mary?or even if you've stopped all Roman Catholics practices but have yet to give yourself over to Christ, your not saved yet.If you've left Catholicism and start changing, your no longer a Catholic but your not saved.

  • Yes many Catholics are deceived, unfortunately many have come from a long line of family tradition, so they will not break the cycle because great, great, great grandpa was catholic. Cathocism in a Tradition, they admit this openly. So any catholic who is deceived is because of his own refusal to look into his church belief, Not the Catholic church fault. Yes they have responsiblity as well but so those the individual. He has decided to follow, Catholocism never forced him.

  • @Adriangrosvenor Interesting observation about Catholics themselves but the REASON they're deceived is because they're following a false prophet (Matthew 7:15) which is the entire Roman Catholic religious system of salvation. Romanism teaches a SYSTEM of WORKS RIGHTEOUSNESS for earned salvation (please see our 16 hour series with Rob Zins, Th.M, Dallas Theological Seminary & former Romanist here on YOUTUBE to prove the point - Show #1: NOT REAL CHRISTIANITY BUT OLD TESTAMENT JUDAISM IN DISGUISE.

  • @CAnswersTV Yes shure I will check your vid. Roman Catholocism is actually a Nation though. Rome is a country so any member authomatically becomes a citizen when they convert to this system. They have the right to vote on the UN council. Rome is the actual Beast of Daniel and Revelation, that very little horn speaking pompous thing. Pope=Anti Christ. Anti-Christ means another Christ. Only the pope can qualify. He forgive sins, calls himself God, and we are keeping the gregorian callender.

  • @Adriangrosvenor Once again another very interesting comment! Almost all the original Protestant confessions of faith declared that the Pope was the very anti-Christ according to 2 Thessalonians 2:3-12. For example, the Lutheran Smalcald Articles II, IV, 10-14, cf Formula X, 20 says: "Thus the Papacy also will be a part of ... Antichrist. Therefore, just as little as we can worship the devil himself as Lord & God, we can endure his apostle, the Pope, or Antichrist in his rule as head or lord.."

  • I love how so called "Christians" use the Catholic written book on christianity called the Bible as their reference to attack the Catholic Church!!! Ha! makes alot of sense Einstien

  • @JamesFrancis1000 Your statement is based on pure ignorance & "Einstein" (you didn't even spell his name right) would be ashamed of you. See our video here on YOUTUBE entitled, "EARLY CHRISTIAN CHURCH HISTORY PROVES ROMAN CATHOLICISM FALSE," & former Romanist priest for 25 years Richard Bennett's "CATHOLIC INQUISITION & THE TORTURE TOOLS" (333,447 hits), & our website on church history - HISTORYCART COM. See our 16 hour series, type "LARRY WESSELS ROMAN CATHOLICISM" in the YOUTUBE search box.

  • @CAnswersTV I'd rather have a response from you rather than being directed to some heretical former priest, so to listen to his demonic hate for Gods almighty church... Lets start with Luke 1:48 and get your thoughts there first.. Thanks!

  • @JamesFrancis1000 Immediately you AVOID hours of posted material right here on YOUTUBE which, by your own comment you dismiss as "demonic" without referencing whether your accusation is true or false. The open minded can type "RICHARD BENNETT ROMAN CATHOLICISM" in the YOUTUBE search box to see if your claim is true. Next you refuse to look at our church history website (over 10 years of research) HISTORYCART COM. Your Luke 1:48 has nothing to do with whether Romanism is true or false, get it?

  • @CAnswersTV Over 10 years? Is this supposed to impress me? what about the Catholic Church and it's conception over 2000 years ago? Really? Are you familiar with the massoretic text? I'll check out your heretical channel after I finish with work... In the mean time mediate on Luke 1:48... Thanks

  • @JamesFrancis1000 The point is "2000 years" of Romanist history proves it is NOT Christ's true church but a counterfeit of it (once again former priest & author documents this, type "RICHARD BENNETT ROMAN CATHOLICISM" in the YOUTUBE search box; also see former Romanist & author Rob Zins', Th.M, Dallas Theological Seminary 16 hour series on Romanism, type "ROB ZINS ROMAN CATHOLICISM" in the YOUTUBE search box). Look at all the homosexual priests (& pedophile cases) that infest the Romanist cult.

  • catholicism is christianity in its purest form

  • @charmaineduffy You don't even know what's going on in your own "church"! Here's why: 1. 50% or more of Romanist priests are homosexuals (that's why there are so many pedophile lawsuits going on against the RC church) according to RC sources, 2. Pope Paul VI was a homosexual, 3. Pope John Paul II was an evolutionist & a universalist, he kissed the Muslim Koran & promoted anti-Bible Raymond Brown as a great "exegete", 4. Pope Ratzinger denies the real, physical resurrection of Christ. Wake up!

  • @CAnswersTV John Paul ii was obvisiouly the anit christ ! St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica, Pt. II, Q. 12, A. 1, Obj. 2: “… if anyone were to… worship at the tomb of Mahomet, he would be deemed an apostate.” However CAnswersTV this does not discredit the Catholic Church as Almighty Gods Church on Earth, in fact it does quite the opposite and brings even more validity to the Catholic Church... 2nd Epistle Of Saint Paul To The Thessalonians 2:4....

  • Comment removed

  • WHY is it that we also see the word "Debate" on these Evangelical shows when it comes to Catholicism... and yet NEVER is there ANY Catholic Clergy within the debating Arena ?

  • @legasyth We have lots of debates with Roman Catholic spokesmen posted on Youtube, you were just not aware of them. A quick way to find many of them is type "LARRY WESSELS ROMAN CATHOLICISM" in the YOUTUBE search box. You can also go to our channel page, CANSWERSTV which is currently displaying one of our 2 hour debates. Check out the 1 hour "DEBATE WITH WITH A MONSIGNOR" (skip the 10 minute versions). We have debates on Mary, indulgences, the pope, infallibility, etc. We'll have more coming.

  • @TheStyx44 I would say to be perfectly honest, that motives and good works are the most important. If a Hindi and a Christian both have their own different faiths, but the net result (good works) is the same, what makes the two people different? I think what they profess to believe, or their faith. Now you are back to square one again. But I think Jesus intention was to see a love for one another as the objective, not professing an understanding of doctrines etc

  • @RealJesusforAtheists You're totally wrong! You have absolutely no understanding of New Testament theology or doctrine. Jesus said, "Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, & the daughter against her mother, & the daughter in law against her mother in law. And a man's foes shall be they of his own household. He that loveth father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me" (Matt 10:34-37).

  • @CAnswersTV I think you need to study. Next thing you'll be telling me Jesus did actually have a sword too. If you read between the lines, what he is saying is not everyone is going to agree with him, even within families.

  • @RealJesusforAtheists You don't use the Midrash to interpret the NT for one thing since Old Testament Jewish laws & customs were changed by Jesus (Matthew 5:18, 20, 22, 26, 28, 31, 39, 44 - "but I say to you"; he spoke with His own authority, not like the Jewish teachers - Matthew 7:29, get it?). Jewish laws & customs were changed, just ask Peter (Acts 10). Next, Jesus told his disciples to have real swords (Luke 22:36-38) but the point of Matt 10:34-37 is to disprove your nonsense about Hindus.

  • What is a Christian? Is it an action, an attitude, or simply what one believes? If it is simply what one believes, which is what this man is advocating, then that is not Christainity. James describes the only good religion as "pure religion" of "caring for orphans and widows". Speaking of James, listen to 8:32 Does James say that? Oh well, we can remove that can't we.

  • @RealJesusforAtheists Becoming a Christian is caused by a supernatural act of God in certain people (Romans 9:10-23, John 6: 37, 44, 63, 65-66, Titus 3:5), & not because they chose it or were born into it (John 1:12-13) or worked for it (Galatians 2:16) & it happens only in a few (Matt 7:13-29). The problem you have is not understanding Biblical hermeneutics properly. When a man is indwelt by the Holy Spirit (1 Cor. 6:19-20) he is sealed for eternity unto God (Ephesians 4:30) & does good deeds.

  • @CAnswersTV Amen!

  • @CAnswersTV I totally disagree with your understanding. Do you understand midrash? Or any ancient language? Please tell me?

  • @RealJesusforAtheists You mean you totally DISAGREE with the NEW TESTAMENT & its teachings except where you want to twist Bible verses or passages into what you want them to mean (2 Peter 3:16). I've studied New Testament Greek & I have many Old Testament Hebrew reference books. The Jewish Midrash is a way of interpreting biblical stories that goes beyond normal heremeneutics (which do you accept aggada or halakha?). The problem you have is YOUR UNDERSTANDING described in 1 Corinthians 2:14.

  • @CAnswersTV I say I totally disagree with your understanding, then you say I mean I totally disagree with NT. The net conclusion to that is you know the NT full stop. You obviously don't. You understand Midrash, give me an example of Midrash, in Matthew for example. I'm no Catholic, but I can kind of understand why the Catholic tends to do the teaching, or they would all end up like you.

  • @RealJesusforAtheists You end up like me when you simply believe what the Bible plainly teaches. You don't need the Jewish Midrash or the Roman Catholic Church to understand the Scriptures but you do need the Holy Spirit through a "born again" supernatural experience (1 Corinthians 2:14-16) which you "obviously" haven't had. You trust the Midrash not the Bible (2 Tim 3:15-17). A good midrash halakha example is in Matthew 15:1-2 followed by Jesus' reply to that Jewish nonsense in Matthew 15:3-14.

  • @CAnswersTV: OK--but the Bible plainly calls for a CHURCH, and an AUTHORITATIVE Church at that!

    You'll find this Bible-believing, Jesus-loving, His-Sacrifice-accepting Christian in a Catholic pew every Sunday (and every weekday I have a chance to as well)

  • @HammerDoc This assertion is incredibly false & a denial of reality. If you take a poll of people who claim to be Catholics the majority of them will not know what the Bible teaches (this includes the priests also, with almost 50% of them being homosexuals (see news for pedophile cases) according to Roman Catholic sources; even Pope Paul VI was a homosexual, in love with a male movie star). See our 1 hour version "DEBATE WITH A MONSIGNOR" & tell me how many Bible verses he quotes. 1 Tim 4:1-3

  • Thanks for uploading, I'm going to enjoy this I'm sure.

    An invaluable resource for reaching the lost, thanks again.

  • Revelation 17:1-5.

  • @BibleBeliever994 Ratzinger's "Introduction to Christianity" p. 243, "their essential content is not the conception of a restoration of bodies to souls after a long interval; their aim is to tell men that they, they themselves live on ... because they are known & loved by God in a way that they can no longer perish ... the essential part of man, the person, remains ... it goes on existing because it lives in God's memory." Ratzinger brushes aside all attempts to verify historical resurrection. 

  • @BibleBeliever994 Ratzinger's (Pope Benedict's) book, "Eschatology: Death & Eternal Life" covers, among other things, the nature of the resurrection. He notes that the accepted view among modern Roman Catholic & liberal Protestant theologians is that body & soul expire at the point of death & "the proper Christian thing, therefore is to speak, not of the soul's immortality" p. 105 & p 259 he says "soul is nothing other than man's capacity for relatedness with truth" thus denying a real essense.

  • You are like SAUL persecuting God himself by these ridiculous video documents. Jesus doesn't want this. He wants us to be united. No wonder nonbelievers laugh at us we can't even get along amongst ourselves. We love, worship, honor, and obey Jesus Christ. WHO are you? You are fallible people and you are leading others to believe what you believe which are lies and untruths about our denomination. You guys need to read Paul & study his letters more clearly.

  • Comment removed

  • @BibleBeliever994 The problem you have with Romanism & its theology is it's always talking out of both sides of its mouth at the same time. A Mormon says he believes in Jesus but WHO is the Jesus the Mormon is talking about? The Mormon lets you assume he believes in the same Jesus as a real Christian but really the Mormon believes Jesus is the brother of the devil. Benedict talks out of both sides of his mouth. In his book "Introduction" he denies the physical resurrection, so what does he mean?

  • Lord help us. What is happening? Satan comes in all forms continuing to divide Christians. He divides us through the ignorance of these people who make horribly offensive accusations. We are WAY more biblical that any Protestant denomination. I have never heard a Priest speak ill of any Protestant denomination. We do preach the Gospel. Peter was our first Pope. You took your books from OUR bible! Lol this is insane. We are suppose to stand together.

  • @joeyamg The mistake you're making is that you're ASSUMING that Romanists are real Christians. You've never studied the issues concerning this so let us help you. Please begin with our 16 hour series, "ROMAN CATHOLICISM SERIES" with former Romanist Rob Zins. Program #1 is entitled, "NOT REAL CHRISTIANITY BUT OLD TESTAMENT JUDAISM IN DISGUISE." See also our video "EARLY CHRISTIAN CHURCH HISTORY PROVES ROMAN CATHOLICISM FALSE." Then type LARRY WESSELS ROMAN CATHOLICISM in the Youtube search box.

  • @CAnswersTV I have listened. Have you listened? Try Scott Hahn. God loves me and Jesus Christ has already died for me there is nothing you can do. I love love love my faith. I get to celebrate His great sacrifice in every church service. I get to consume His body and blood as He instructed His followers to do... "do this in memory of me". Preach on brother, but not to the choir. God Bless and do not worry about saving me! ha ha

  • @joeyamg You're very nervous since you keep saying "ha ha" in your comments. You ought to be nervous since you're hoping that your Romanist religion will save you along with the phony Romanist Jesus you believe in through the Roman "mass" (2 Cor. 11:4, Gal. 1:6-9). It's obvious you're too scared to look at the over 40 hours of videos we have posted online on Romanism (type RICHARD BENNETT in the Youtube search as well, he was a former priest). God loves His elect (Romans 9:10-23) not everyone.

  • @CAnswersTV Pardon my french, but who the HELL in their right mind would want to look at 40 videos of ANYTHING?? LOL (oops I am laughing again, probably a sin in your church). Yeah good luck with that!

  • @joeyamg The point is not that you will watch the 40 hours of videos we have done on Roman Catholicism (which includes many debates with Roman Catholic spokesman; type 'LARRY WESSELS ROMAN CATHOLICISM" in the YOUTUBE search box for a sampling - you don't have to watch them but just to see that we have actually produced them) but that we have thoroughly researched the subject of the Romanist religion. Laughing is not a sin but it can be a sign of nervousness. You're just emotional about all this.

  • Great Job

    Thanks

  • @arphaxadjoktan Thanks brother! This is just a short 10 minute clip from a 16 hour series produced on Roman Catholicism with Rob Zins, Th.M., Dallas Theological Seminary & former Catholic. To quickly find this series including all the other shows we have done on this subject please type "LARRY WESSELS ROMAN CATHOLICISM" in the Youtube search box & an array of videos will come up. Blessings!

  • @BibleBeliever994 You must mean the Anti-Christ (see our Youtube video, "Roman Catholicism Series #8: The Pope - Holy Father or Anti-Christ of 2nd Thessalonians 2:3-17?", this is a one hour show from a 16 hour series, or type LARRY WESSELS ROMAN CATHOLICISM in the Youtube search box to see them all). Yes, it's true, your Pope (Joseph Ratzinger) Benedict XVI denies the literal resurrection of Jesus & he promotes evolution & universalism. See his book "Introduction to Christianity" pp. 246, 152.

  • Heard so many ignoant protestants who say they can do anything they want because jesus died for there sins.these guys need to proceed to the church there probaly good at which isnt the church of jesus. trying to put it nicley

  • @davidnco1 Your comment is based on logical fallacies (RED HERRING, AD HOMINEM, CARD STACKING & NON SEQUITUR) which has nothing to do with this presentation. This is just a short 10 minute clip from a 16 hour series on Roman Catholicism. To see the entire series type LARRY WESSELS ROMAN CATHOLICISM in the Youtube search box & an array of videos will come up. The first episode in the series is entitled, "Not Real Christianity But Old Testament Judaism in Disguise." Romanism fails the Bible test.

  • @Cottonmouth899 Think about this logically. Jesus at the last supper - "And as they were eating, Jesus took bread, & blessed it, & brake it, & gave it to the disciples, & said, 'Take, eat; this is my body.' And he took the cup, & gave it to them, saying, 'Drink ye all of it; For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins'" (Matthew 26:26-28). How could the bread & the wine be LITERALLY Jesus' body & blood since He was still at the table with them?

  • @ Canswers, can you tell me what the catholic water baptism does for them.. does it.. a) wash away sin.b) does it given them new spiritual life... i would of that that catholic water baptism saves them... if this is true why do they say that the mass now saves them....

    this doesnt make sence...either way....

  • @MrLoudmouthspeaker You must remember that Roman Catholicism is a WORKS SALVATION system of religion. You must travel through the various works ("sacraments,' etc) along the way to POSSIBLY make it to PURGATORY (if you do enough good works) & then you need more good works to POSSIBLY get you out of purgatory to earn your way into heaven. Water baptism is what Rome says makes you "born again" automatically & they interpret John 3:3-8 that way. However this is just one work to be done among many.

  • @CAnswersTV so the average catholic cant see through the disception of all this so no matter how much they do they are still dependant on the church ...

  • @CAnswersTV - you're 100% correct - man must "earn" his way into Heaven by his genuine commitment to the teachings of Christ. Unless, you're an idiot, you'll right now be signing up to the RCC - unless of course, being an idiot, you really believe God is an even bigger idiot, and will let just anyone, including everyone who "believes" in Jesus into Heaven! Well then, given Satan "believes" in Jesus he'll probably be there too - but of course, he won't, because his WORKS will stop him! ouch!

  • @mmmail1969 You're "100%" WRONG in your understanding of Biblical salvation. You CANNOT earn your salvation (Gal 2:16, Ephesians 2:8-10, Isaiah 64:6, Titus 3:5-7, etc) or even obtain faith (Romans 9:32), keep yourself saved (1 Cor 3:15) or forgive sin (Romans 4: 6-8). For a better understanding of Romanism & how it "works" you need to watch our 16 hour "Roman Catholicism Series" (type LARRY WESSELS in Youtube search box). Show #1: "Not Real Christianity but Old Testament Judaism in Disguise."

  • @CAnswersTV - the books of the Bible were compiled at Hippo in 393, Carthage in 397, whence it was sent to Rome for confirmation in 419. The Bible - sure - the Bible and a continuous 2,000 history of the Roman Catholic Church - the best chance of eternal life!

  • @mmmail1969 I like the way you put that from a Romanist position - "the best CHANCE of eternal life." You aren't trusting Jesus for your salvation (1 John 5:13), you're trusting the Romanist system to give you a CHANCE (by doing good works, trusting the Pope who is a universalist, an evolutionist, a condoner of homosexual priests, & a denier of the literal resurrection of Christ, etc). 2 Peter 3:16 shows no Romanist cult is necessary for the Scriptures to be here (see website HISTORYCART COM).

  • @Cottonmouth899 you tell me that if you dont eat the waffer God you dont have eternal life with in you... so are you telling me that your water baptism doesnt save you then is that what you are telling me...tell me exatly what does water baptism do for you and how is it different from the mass...

  • @Cottonmouth899 Here we have the typical Romanist understanding of the man-made doctrine of transubstantiation instituted into the Lord's supper (see 1 Corinthians 11 & Matthew 26) so that idolatry & blasphemy can take place on a regular basis (Satan knows no limits in heresy). This doctrine of making a piece of bread into the literal body of Jesus & the wine into his literal blood is a direct violation of Exodus 20:4-5. Romanists WORSHIP this bread & wine as God Himself when it is NOT God.

  • CAanswerstv. My fault, I misread that line in a hurry back from lunch.

  • Mr Loudmouthspeaker, question for you. Do you receive communion @ your church? Why do you receive than, if you have received "Gods new Spirit"

    (isn't God the same yesterday, today and forever?) Thanks. 

  • @cribisencinibis I'd like to jump in. You've asked "MrLoudmouthspeaker" a question but you have either deliberately or inadvertently misstated what he said by saying he said "God's new Spirit." Where in his comment did he say that phrase "God's new Spirit." Are you suggesting that God has a new Spirit or that "MrLoudmouthspeaker" is saying that? "MrLoudmouthspeaker" says "God's new spiritual life," is that what you mean by "God's new Spirit"? New spiritual life takes place when someone is saved.

  • @cribisencinibis You ask a great question...we believe that when we receive jesus we have been "born again" transformed from death to life... we have litterally receive Gods life with in us we are no longer spiritually dead..God lives with us... So how does this relate to the communion, well for us it is done for rememberance.. of what God has done for us... communion cant save us it doesnt add more spiritual life to us..

    does that help

  • @cribisencinibis hi i see what you mean... Yes God is the same yesterday, today and for ever... what i should stated is that before we know God we are spiritually dead we are seperated from God by our sin...should be able to understand this....so when i mean we recieve Gods new life.. it means that our dead spirit is made alive to christ... God gives us his spirit to us.we are no longer cut off from God. we have been made alive to christ

    we have been adopted into Gods family by his spirit

  • @Cottonmouth899 so if thats the case how can the mass save you...

  • @fromsuncity1 you should know that the truth is based on a numbers game... ie the more you have on your side the more truth you have, God did not screw up... man has decieded to go his own way... man has created his own tradtions... simple as that...

  • @fromsuncity1 I understand your frustration but please don't refute in such ways, they are not Christ like. I am not better than you, please don't take this that way. I am just a brother in Christ through his Holy Church with you :) I am looking out for our reactions and to insure that we are reacting out of Love for Christ and not hatred from the enemy. 2 Timothy 2: 24-26

  • @fromsuncity1 you forget that as a christian you should walk daily with god as a christian god dwells within -you talk like you havent recieved god yet.......

  • @fromsuncity1 i have been busy... sorry... so you tell me that catholics are born again through their water baptism... is that ... first tell me what that means to you... have you been transformed from spiritual death to spiritual life....by God... if you truly have and God lives with in you... why do you eat the mass... is it because you have to or does the mass give you eternal life.. what does the mass do for you

  • @fromsuncity1 ok why must you eat jesus every week for the rest of your life... havnt you been born again when you were baptised in water... didnt you receive jesus then and new spiritual life ..if so you wouldnt need to eat jesus.... the only reason you would to eat jesus is because you dont share in Gods new spiritual life...

  • i would like to know if catholics believe that God dwells within them like the bible states.. (that we are the temple of God) to me it sounds like they havent received Gods new spiritual life when they receive God in their lives..

    if they were truly born again they wouldnt need to eat jesus ever week in mass..

    it defeats the purpose dont you think?

  • @MrLoudmouthspeaker Here you have put your finger on the REAL problem with Roman Catholicism (or any other false religion for that matter). Romanism, like any "works righteousness" religion seeks to REPLACE the SUPERNATURAL power of the Holy Spirit in spiritual regeneration (John 3:3-8, Titus 3:5-7, 1 Corinthians 6:19-20, Romans 5:4-5, etc.) with their "sacraments" of water baptism, confession, etc. They then deceive people by declaring that they are "Christians" by these "works" (Eph 2:8-10).

  • @CAnswersTV Hi thanks for that...i have always wondered about the disception within the catholic church it seems very strong... i wonder if the average catholic really understands..??

  • @MrLoudmouthspeaker It's been our experience over the last 30 yrs of witnessing for Christ to Roman Catholics that the average Romanist is very limited in his understanding of what the Bible actually says. Most people who are Romanists are so NOT because they had a supernatural act of God take place in their lives (John 3:3-8, John 6:63, 65) to change their worldly view to a Biblical view but because they were BORN that way. Romanism, because it's unBiblical, does not promote real Bible study.

  • @CAnswersTV hi, i am starting to get the idea in regards to catholics... one topic the mass really gets me..if they believe they are "born again' through water baptism why then do they have to eat jesus through the mass....shouldnt their water baptism be enough... i would of thought? the mass doctrine is backwards

  • @CAnswersTV No you just have different opinions, man made opinions I might add, to what scripture is teaching. How can the Catholic Church not understand scripture? They canonized it.

  • @CAnswersTV Interesting to see how these websites are modern day sources of destruction of souls. I pray for the souls led to confusion and disbelief because of these heretic teachings and denials to God.

  • As a former Protestant (converted to Catholicism last year) I can see where some sincere misunderstandings arise.

    A good example of what happens when a protestant scholar investigates the claims of Catholicism would be Dr.Francis Beckwith. Dr.Beckwith was the President of the American Evangelical Theological Society (a group of 4,300 Protestant Scholars) prior to his conversion to Catholicism.

  • @megaead69 Conversions abound when it comes to Catholics "converting" to Protestantism & Protestants "converting" to Romanism (both sides can claim plenty of converts endlessly). Type RICHARD BENNETT in the Youtube search box & see how many videos this former Roman priest for 25 years has done to expose the anti-Biblical teachings of the Roman religion (he's now Protestant). The bottomline is whether someone has been truly regenerated by the Holy Spirit; when that happens, they won't join Rome.

  • @CAnswersTV True that. I was in the Romish church for two years, and I even studied the majority of their apologetics materials, compared with their provided or recommended scriptural references. I eventually saw, more and more, the contradictions with not only Scripture, but with plain, God-given reason. And Christian history shows without a doubt they have gradually added on doctrines and dogmas since the Middle Ages that were NOT practiced in the very early Universal Church.

  • @rjky1986 Very well said! Naturally, we couldn't agree with you more! This short 10 minute video clip is from our first episode of a 16 hour video series on Roman Catholicism with former Roman Catholic Rob Zins. Lord willing, we'll soon starting posting that entire series here on Youtube. Currently it 's posted on GOOGLE VIDEO & YAHOO VIDEO (but Yahoo is removing everyone's videos on March 15, 2011). For other good info on Romanism see former RC priest RICHARD BENNETT here on YOUTUBE. Blessings.

  • Respond to this video...saint peter can't reconcile you with god and he can't get his good graces for you speak to him yourself Jesus can hear the prayers of millions of Christians all at one time he doesn't need any help receiving prayers.

  • @JOAOBUNITAO --St Peter and all Priest can reconcile us to God, first through water baptism, and for the elect its the sacrement of Confession.

  • @AtomicMonster559 7“Why does this man speak that way? He is blaspheming; who can forgive sins but God alone?" and where does it say in the bible that priest can reconcile us to god?

  • @JOAOBUNITAOthat was the old testament the new testament says this is not possible anymore "The temple veil tearing in two at Jesus’ death was symbolic of the dividing wall between God and humanity being destroyed. We can approach God directly, ourselves, without the use of a human mediator. Why? Because Jesus Christ is our great High Priest (Hebrews 4:14-15; 10:21),

  • @JOAOBUNITAO --"recieve the Holy Spirit; whos sins you forgive, they are forgiven, whos sins you do not forgive, they are not forgiven." --St Johns Gospel

    --------------------

    If it does not mean what it says, what does it mean?

  • @AtomicMonster559 priests were mediators between the people and God. The priests offered sacrifices to God on behalf of the people. That is no longer necessary. Because of Jesus’ sacrifice, we can now approach God’s throne with boldness (Hebrews 4:16).

  • @AtomicMonster559 The Bible says confess your sins one to another. James 5:16. That was what Jesus meant. He never gave your priests any special privileges.

  • @73geneva --When we forgive another person for some wrong they have done to us, it still must be forgiven by God, and that is what the sacrament of confession is for, just as in St Johns Gospel. PS CAnswersTV is a poor debater and likes to block people from trashing fundie-ism.

  • @TheUltraHorror559 The "Ultra Horror" is your insidious comment defending the Roman "sacrament of Confession" to a Roman priest (Roman Catholic statistics say half of all RC "priests" are homosexuals & major news media sources report the many pedophile lawsuits are lodged & won against these "priests"). Where in the Bible does it say to confess your sins to a homosexual Romanist "priest" (who likewise violate 1 Timothy 4:3)? Sins are confessed to God (1 John 1:9). Titus 3:10 trashes Romanists.

  • @TheUltraHorror559 he is talking to the apostles not to the whole human race Clearly Jesus was addressing the power to forgive sins ONLY to his Apostles and to their Successors for the forgivness of sins.Yes, we all must forgive our brothers and sisters if they have wronged us, but what if we have wronged God, can our brothers and sisters forgive us for THE WRONGS/SINS we have done to God? NO!

  • @AtomicMonster559 These words spoken by "Atomic Monster" are a perfect example of what a real Romanist believes. See how he states that "St Peter & all Priest[s] can reconcile us to God." Here he has REPLACED the Lord Jesus Christ as the ONE MEDIATOR between God & man (1 Timothy 2:5) with "St Peter" & Romanist priests. Then he makes SAVIOURS out of water baptism & the Romanist sacrament of Confession (telling all your latest sins to a Romanist priest), once again REPLACING Christ as SAVIOUR.

  • Respond to this video..."I am the LORD: that is my name: and my glory will I not give to another, neither my praise to graven images." —Isaiah 42:8 

  • @AtomicMonster559 i think your brainwashed read the bible or read a book on history about catholics either one you will see the truth

  • @JOAOBUNITAO --no, you mean "you're brainwashed"; typical fundie with poor english skills.

  • they just don't read the Bible

  • If the Roman Catholic Community is not biblical... Do not forget... it is the ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH THAT DEEMED THAT THE BIBLE TO BE THE WORD OF GOD...

  • @sheldon126 You probably don't have the time to read them all but this video already has 381 comments & I'm not sure how many Romanists have already CLAIMED the same thing you are now CLAIMING but it's a number. Many false religions & cults claim the Bible as the Word of God & Romanism is no different. Islam claims authority for itself by giving lip service to the Bible just as Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons, Hindus, etc. 2 Peter 3:16 refutes the Romanist CLAIM on the Bible (see HISTORYCART COM).

  • This is hilarious, two protestants jumping a priest. LOL! Disputing with one another from the same book. There are over 400 denomination of Christianity. The Author of confusion was at work in the early days of the Church. Islam and The Holy Quran offers a clear way to he who will except and follow it.

  • @Legend1One Spoken as someone who has never truly studied Christianity. If you'd studied the history of Christianity as we have (see our website HISTORYCART COM) or studied the Bible as we have (see our website BIBLEQUERY ORG which answers over 7700 questions) then you'd know that the vast majority of people who claim to be Christians aren't real Christians & thus there is such confusion, get it? If you had studied Islam as we have (see our website MUSLIMHOPE COM) you would know Islam is false.

  • @CAnswersTV And who the hell are you? Are you the final arbiter of who is or isn't Christian?

  • @GregHuismans The "final arbiter" in this court is the Word of God (see our website BIBLEQUERY ORG for more on the trustworthiness of the Bible & our website HISTORYCART COM to see the history & teachings of the early Christian Church, which refutes the religion of Roman Catholicism in itself). Thus the Bible is the going to tell us who is a Christian & who is not. For an indepth study of why Romanism is not Christian Biblically see our 16 hour series on GOOGLE VIDEO (search LARRY WESSELS).

  • @CAnswersTV I don't know your denomination, but I'm fairly sure you would NEVER have received the Good News had it not been for the propagation of Christianity in Europe by the Roman Catholic Church. Give credit where it's due and don't bite the had that's fed you, you pathetic misguided ingrate.

  • @GregHuismans The "denomination" is NOT important but the WORD OF GOD (the Bible) is! Not only have you FAILED to tell us WHY the Romanist religion is the TRUTH when half their priests are practicing homosexuals (many among them are pedophiles) in violation of 1 Timothy 4:1-3 or answer our website HISTORYCART COM which clearly shows that the early Christian church was NOT a Roman Catholic organization. Nor have you answered 2 Peter 3:16 (no Romanism necessary). You name call without any proof.

  • @CAnswersTV --have you ever considered joining the catholic faith? We could use on-fire folks like yourself.

  • @AtomicMonster559 No. Before I was "born again" (not by water baptism, but Holy Spirit regeneration, 1 Corinthians 6:19-20, Romans 5:4-5, Titus 3:5-8) by a Sovereign Act of God in 1981, which had nothing to do with my own works or will power, I used to attend St. Mary's Catholic Church now & then with my soon to be wife (more for her sake than mine). After I then became a REAL Christian I suddenly realized how SPIRITUALLY DEAD the Romanist Church was; an APOSTATE church, not following the Bible.

  • @CAnswersTV --St Johns gospel tells us that water baptism is how people are born again: "unless a man is born of water and the spirit he will not enter the kingdom of God".

    --------------

    How much did you know the catholic faith before you split? Where do you worship now?

  • @AtomicMonster559 When I deal with Jehovah's Witnesses for instance (see our shows on this subject on YOUTUBE, one is entitled, "Jehovah's Witnesses: Strange & Peculiar Beliefs"), these cultic religionists ALWAYS ASSUME that their INTERPRETATION of any Bible verse is correct. Why do JWs do this? Because they believe the Watchtower Society is God's organization on earth & their interpretations must be correct. You do the same with John 3:3-8. You AREN'T "born again" by a Romanist water baptism.

  • @CAnswersTV --Thank you for the insult. But Trinitarian water baptism now saves us, just as the first Pope (St Cephas) said in his Epistle. And if John 3 is not speaking about baptism that now saves us, what is he refering to?

  • @AtomicMonster559 You're totally WRONG in your UNDERSTANDING of water baptism & using misapplied Bible texts will not help you either (the Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons, Muslims, Campbellites, & others twist Bible texts just like you are now doing; 2 Peter 3:16). Water baptism is something that is done by a person AFTER THEY HAVE BEEN SAVED BY THE HOLY SPIRIT, NOT BEFORE (Acts 10:44-48, Romans 8:8-17, etc), get it? Water in John 3 can symbolize the Word of God (Eph 5:26), birth, or the Spirit.

  • @AtomicMonster559 Oh, Peter was not a pope, pls. Compare Peter, a poor fisherman from Bethsaida, with the man at the vatican; an extension of the ancient Caesars.

  • @AtomicMonster559 catholic churches follow the word of men over the bible they say they have the "holy tradition' why would entrust his word with killers and pedos i don't believe we should trust the word of men over the bible

  • We preceded and were given the Bible...so, yeah, had to be "biblical" in the sense you folks understand it. But we definitely are Christian

  • @burkardhanis Please keep in mind that Jesus Himself said that only a few of the people who claimed to be "Christian" were actually real Christians (Matthew 7:13-29, Luke 8:5-18, etc). Just as only a "remnant" of the people in Israel in the Old Testament were actually true Israelites who followed God (Jeremiah 23:3, Joel 2:32, etc) so too in the New Testament only a "remnant" of professing "Christians" will be saved (Romans 9:27,11:5, etc) by God's mercy (Romans 9:10-23). Romanism is APOSTATE.

  • @CAnswersTV you have no logical sense...your hatred blinds you. while the first part of your syllogism is true, your conclusion is not logical. anyone who claims to be saved may or may not be depending on how they are judged when Christ returns. while you and I can say to be a member of this or that Church/denomination requires this or that, only Christ will judge. you can certainly have your opinion, but you have no authority to judge...Christ be merciful to you! Peace

  • @burkardhanis You begin with 2 logical fallacies, HASTY GENERALIZATION & AD HOMINEM, thus your claims of "no logical sense" & "hatred" disprove your proposition from the start. Next, you proceed with the logical fallacies of NON SEQUITUR & BEGGING THE QUESTION to augment your previously stated absurdities. An idiot could argue at this level. Next you commit the fallacy of FALSE ANALOGY in linking being "saved" with "Christ returns" (another NON SEQUITUR). Being saved happens BEFORE the return.

  • @CAnswersTV you have no logical sense...your hatred blinds you. while the first part of your syllogism is true, your conclusion is not logical. anyone who claims to be saved may or may not be depending on how they are judged when Christ returns. while you and I can say to be a member of this or that Church/denomination requires this or that, only Christ will judge. you can certainly have your opinion, but you have no authority to judge...Christ be merciful to you! Peace

  • What a load of bollocks !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You guys are serious confused. Get with the program , Who started your church? I understand the superior claim to authority that the Catholic Church has. Martin Luther and Henry VIII never met Christ in person but St Peter did, so there´s no argument there.