@jocen3 Same subject, different time, so the subject appears to "jump" positions. Some argue it is only a jump cut if the angle, AND the subject stay the same, some say only the subject needs to stay the same.
It's a vague artistic definition for something that can't be empirically defined.
I'm more in the "Angle and subject remaining the same"camp myself.
most go by the "30 degree rule". as soon as two consecutive shots differ 30 degrees or less the viewer will perceive this sequence as a jump cut; the focus is drawn to the same subject as the previous shot.
Although we can agree on the angle and subject having to remain the same
Lars Von Trier utilizes the jump cut as aesthetic to adhere the overall emotional context of his then (dogme influenced) gritty lo-res DV stories.
bobunitone 9 months ago
uhm, i dont get it...
jocen3 2 years ago
@jocen3 Same subject, different time, so the subject appears to "jump" positions. Some argue it is only a jump cut if the angle, AND the subject stay the same, some say only the subject needs to stay the same.
It's a vague artistic definition for something that can't be empirically defined.
I'm more in the "Angle and subject remaining the same"camp myself.
HoShiiJii 1 year ago
@HoShiiJii
most go by the "30 degree rule". as soon as two consecutive shots differ 30 degrees or less the viewer will perceive this sequence as a jump cut; the focus is drawn to the same subject as the previous shot.
Although we can agree on the angle and subject having to remain the same
jonesnicolai 1 year ago