And... the people who were hoping the water would keep the dust down are retards. They should've used 10 times more hoses and water than that. I bet they felt a little sheepish watching that HUGE dust cloud rise up and drift of in the face of their tiny squirt-guns!
dude why dont iraqis get into this business, its better then spending your life for 1 building.. they can actually make money destroying multiple buildings..
that warrants all officals in office at the time should be brought before a Real inquiry, and should be sworn in, and risk jail if found to be lying, then you may get the truth. every word they say should be publicly recorded bu tyeah thats really going to happen isn it,. ive read your youtube profile and it seems that you see youself as a night in armour out to bring down 911 conspracy theorists, well you havent convinced me yet buddy
the part of the inquiry thats secret is the truth that never surfaced thats why so many americans were pissed off that it seemed like a cover up. and anyway its not just the material evidence of footage etc that make me believe it was an inside job, its other things as well, like witness statements which seem contrary to the government line, from firemen who heard the explosions, people who were hurt in them, there is a myriad of data whcih brings enough shadow of doubt on the official line
and to finish! if it is all as the 9111 commision said it was then why was it a fucking secret inquiry? why was no one sacked for negligence, why were the statements from cheney, and bush and the other criminals not allowed to be recorded , filmed etc. both them refused to be interviewed seperatly even though that was one of the demands made by the commision. 911 was a pre-cursor for war on iraq and afghanistan. even most of the familise of the 911 victims dont believe the 911 report
What part of the inquiry was "secret?" Perhaps the part dealing with national security, but that's understandable. The rest was published for all to see. I actually agree that people should have been sacked & that Bush & Cheney's testimony should be made public. Thanks for pointing out that there were disagreements between the 911 Commission and the Bush Administration. That's true. It was a constant battle between them.
only a matter of weeks before the event! silverstein is on tape saying how he told the firemen to bring it building 7 down. so the firmen must have quicly trained themselves up as demolition experts in , run into the building on fire with explosives and rigged up weeks of demolition in hours. believe it if you want but me? well i think its horsehit. silverstein incidently recieved a huge insurance payout on building which had been condemed by the port authorities, strange
@PoetryHound no body says in matter of HOURS "hmmm ok the burning is in bad shape, lets bring it down now" because you need days to put the explosive charges. In many false flag bombings all over the globe, the target building (or area) is closed for repairs, maintenance or any other excuse, a week or two prior to the supposed "terrorist" attacks. ;)
incidently! building 7 was indeed not hit by a plane, a bit of debris caused a few minor fires, building 7 had some of the biggest solid steel ingots girders ever used, it had to be super strong because it was built over the top of a power station, it would have taken literally weeks to plant demolition charges on this massive building, so how was it so easily and efficiently demolished without prior notice, interesting to note that silverstein re-insured this building against terrorism
Who said it was "a bit of debris" and that there were only a "few minor fires." Not the FDNY. Do you have some sort of retroactive x-ray vision that allows you to determine the condition of the interior areas?
No, terrorism coverage is standard in insurance policies & that was the case for WTC 7. It was NOT the case for the twin towers because there had already been a terrorist attack in 1993. You had to specifically add it back in & you'd be stupid not to.
No steel framed building in history ever collapsed due to fire! "Ever" Ever Ever"! but on 911, 3 buildings decided to break the rules of physics not only by collapsing from fire but also collapsing at free fall speed, airline fuel doesnt melt steel anyway, it may weaken the steel but if that happened the building couldnt collapse at free fall speed as a result of a pancake effect which is what was claimed i the horseshit 911 investigation, building 7 wasnt even hit by airline fuel
"No steel framed building in history ever collapsed due to fire!"
False. Other steel-framed buildings have collapsed from fire. You're also mistaken that 3 of them collapsed from fire on 9/11. Just one of them did - WTC 7. The twin towers had another major factor contributing to their collapse. Can you guess what it was? Hint: It flies through the air.
ok mate! NAME THEM! name the steel framed bulidings which collapsed as a result of fire.
If fire weakened the floor struts, that still doesnt debunk the fact that all three buildings came down at freefall speed, the 911 investigation declared that a pancake effect caused the floors to collapse but is not possible at freefall speed. to come down that fast means there was no resistance between the floors. even the ex boss of the cia is on tape saying it had all the hallmarks of an inside job
Other steel framed buidlings? Let's see, there was the Kader Toy Factory & there was McCormick Place. Now, be warned that these are very different buildings from WTC 7 but you simply said steel framed buildings and they were indeed steel framed and they did indeed collapse from fire.
The 3 buildings didn't come down at freefall speed. In the case of the twins, it's easy to see the ejected debris falling faster than the buildings.
the reason the debris fell ahead of the towers is becasue the debris was propelled by force and momentum surely your werent dumb enough to miss that point. im not even going to address the toy factory comment. the tower architects and saying the towers were designed to withstand multiple aircraft strikes. everyone who views the building 7 footage can say the fire damage is minor if not insignifcant in a building that size, certainly not bad enough to warrant demolition.
If there had been a blast, it would propel debris OUTWARDS, so when trajectory becomes straight down it is falling at freefall speed, not FASTER than freefall as you are suggesting. Yes, Kader and McCormick were steel structures that collapsed from fire. No building can withstand 500 mph planes used as missiles; chief structural engineer said they only considered slow plane. How can you tell how much fire damage there is in the interior areas from watching a video of the outside?
Don't protect your masters... planes cant be used as missiles because the lack of explosive material... the mayority of the fuel in the planes consumed itself with the explotion. And you cant melt structural steel with airplane fuel... you do it with Thermite ;)
@iluvj00 He meant figuratively used as missiles. I know you know what a plane looks like. At 500 mph, there's not much that can withstand that. Also, where did you get that structural steel was melted in the WTC?
@fafnir242 man you can see the pics from the rubble, the structural steel columns is cut in 45º angle and with evidence of melting, plus the whole site had RIVERS OF MELTED steel in the inside, its been YEARS since that i can't believe people still argues the evidence, ignorance is not a bliss, and lazyness in research isnt either.
@iluvj00 The columns were cut during cleanup after the towers collapsed. I also have yet to see video of picture evidence of rivers of melted steel. If you can produce such evidence, please do so. If not, then stop talking.
@iluvj00 I don't watch CNN. I found a video on YouTube that shows part of the cleanup process, and the guy was explaining that they were cutting down the columns in the manner that you have seen and claimed was melted by thermite before the collapse. I am not one of the sheep you claim me to be. I do my own research and then come to a conclusion myself. I'm a little insulted you think I am incapable of doing so.
@fafnir242 I don't believe you are a moron, I just think that you lack the experience on the subject (from tons of points of views and documentaries and articles debunking the official story, not even mentioning top officials from all around the world have talked about) so the point is that the possibility of accepting the official story as real is out of the question my friend (the official story bends the laws of physics in every way possible) . What you saw is justifing the 45º thermite cut
@fafnir242 :P man don't believe in montage... im in movies and im pretty good with rhetoric... the worst thing in this life is to justify... even in art... you gotta go deeper than that man.
@iluvj00 And any other comment or report you see, because what the elite does is JUSTIFY everything so you believe them.. so you say "ahhh ok that was it, ok!" and go on with your life while they fuck us all up. Know your enemies man they dont hide anymore they do their deeds in broad daylight.
And you know why? A controlled demolition uses gravity to destroy the target: The building essentially crashes on itself. Just the same effect occured when the columns got melted by the jet fuel ignited fires. The impact itself got absorbed pretty well, the fire killed it.
The reason why it takes weeks and months to prepare a demolition is that it mustn't go wrong IN ANY SINGLE CASE. Otherwise, the company may be held responsible for billion dollars damages and the loss of human lifes.
actually there were numerous eye witness acounts of hearing explosions by firefighters and news personal, not trying to start anything just go ahead and look it up
Very nice demo.
oldfart387 5 months ago
absolutely fake.
arjoj10 1 year ago
see, Duct tape works for everything.
GaryNull 1 year ago
just like wtc
itszitbicz 1 year ago
@itszitbicz fuck you ! Im sick of evey demo vid has some fucking moron mention 911 ! Get a fucking life cocksucker!
dmuse1981 9 months ago
I watched it from my window XD
MediumLargeFries 1 year ago
And... the people who were hoping the water would keep the dust down are retards. They should've used 10 times more hoses and water than that. I bet they felt a little sheepish watching that HUGE dust cloud rise up and drift of in the face of their tiny squirt-guns!
Kauwhaka 1 year ago
The people who say the water was because of fire.. Are total retards. Its to keep the dust down.
rotjesenmatjes 1 year ago
I think the hosing down was a good idea... but... i think they need a little more then that lol cause it didn't really help...
MaxC17 1 year ago
dude why dont iraqis get into this business, its better then spending your life for 1 building.. they can actually make money destroying multiple buildings..
NotMLG 1 year ago
hey i didnt see any plane hitting this one :P
iluvj00 1 year ago 3
@iluvj00
very original dipshit....
SoCalRugger 1 year ago
so fake
jafaretto 2 years ago
that warrants all officals in office at the time should be brought before a Real inquiry, and should be sworn in, and risk jail if found to be lying, then you may get the truth. every word they say should be publicly recorded bu tyeah thats really going to happen isn it,. ive read your youtube profile and it seems that you see youself as a night in armour out to bring down 911 conspracy theorists, well you havent convinced me yet buddy
jasonmhc 2 years ago
the part of the inquiry thats secret is the truth that never surfaced thats why so many americans were pissed off that it seemed like a cover up. and anyway its not just the material evidence of footage etc that make me believe it was an inside job, its other things as well, like witness statements which seem contrary to the government line, from firemen who heard the explosions, people who were hurt in them, there is a myriad of data whcih brings enough shadow of doubt on the official line
jasonmhc 2 years ago
and to finish! if it is all as the 9111 commision said it was then why was it a fucking secret inquiry? why was no one sacked for negligence, why were the statements from cheney, and bush and the other criminals not allowed to be recorded , filmed etc. both them refused to be interviewed seperatly even though that was one of the demands made by the commision. 911 was a pre-cursor for war on iraq and afghanistan. even most of the familise of the 911 victims dont believe the 911 report
jasonmhc 2 years ago 3
What part of the inquiry was "secret?" Perhaps the part dealing with national security, but that's understandable. The rest was published for all to see. I actually agree that people should have been sacked & that Bush & Cheney's testimony should be made public. Thanks for pointing out that there were disagreements between the 911 Commission and the Bush Administration. That's true. It was a constant battle between them.
PoetryHound 2 years ago
only a matter of weeks before the event! silverstein is on tape saying how he told the firemen to bring it building 7 down. so the firmen must have quicly trained themselves up as demolition experts in , run into the building on fire with explosives and rigged up weeks of demolition in hours. believe it if you want but me? well i think its horsehit. silverstein incidently recieved a huge insurance payout on building which had been condemed by the port authorities, strange
jasonmhc 2 years ago
"silverstein is on tape saying how he told the firemen to bring it building 7 down."
No he isn't. He said "they" made that decision to pull. So the FDNY decided to bring down WTC 7? As you've pointed out, that makes no sense.
No, WTC 7 was not condemned and no, the insurance payout was not enough to cover both rebuilding WTC 7 and pay back the bondholders.
PoetryHound 2 years ago
@PoetryHound no body says in matter of HOURS "hmmm ok the burning is in bad shape, lets bring it down now" because you need days to put the explosive charges. In many false flag bombings all over the globe, the target building (or area) is closed for repairs, maintenance or any other excuse, a week or two prior to the supposed "terrorist" attacks. ;)
iluvj00 1 year ago
incidently! building 7 was indeed not hit by a plane, a bit of debris caused a few minor fires, building 7 had some of the biggest solid steel ingots girders ever used, it had to be super strong because it was built over the top of a power station, it would have taken literally weeks to plant demolition charges on this massive building, so how was it so easily and efficiently demolished without prior notice, interesting to note that silverstein re-insured this building against terrorism
jasonmhc 2 years ago
Who said it was "a bit of debris" and that there were only a "few minor fires." Not the FDNY. Do you have some sort of retroactive x-ray vision that allows you to determine the condition of the interior areas?
No, terrorism coverage is standard in insurance policies & that was the case for WTC 7. It was NOT the case for the twin towers because there had already been a terrorist attack in 1993. You had to specifically add it back in & you'd be stupid not to.
PoetryHound 2 years ago
No steel framed building in history ever collapsed due to fire! "Ever" Ever Ever"! but on 911, 3 buildings decided to break the rules of physics not only by collapsing from fire but also collapsing at free fall speed, airline fuel doesnt melt steel anyway, it may weaken the steel but if that happened the building couldnt collapse at free fall speed as a result of a pancake effect which is what was claimed i the horseshit 911 investigation, building 7 wasnt even hit by airline fuel
jasonmhc 2 years ago
"No steel framed building in history ever collapsed due to fire!"
False. Other steel-framed buildings have collapsed from fire. You're also mistaken that 3 of them collapsed from fire on 9/11. Just one of them did - WTC 7. The twin towers had another major factor contributing to their collapse. Can you guess what it was? Hint: It flies through the air.
PoetryHound 2 years ago
ok mate! NAME THEM! name the steel framed bulidings which collapsed as a result of fire.
If fire weakened the floor struts, that still doesnt debunk the fact that all three buildings came down at freefall speed, the 911 investigation declared that a pancake effect caused the floors to collapse but is not possible at freefall speed. to come down that fast means there was no resistance between the floors. even the ex boss of the cia is on tape saying it had all the hallmarks of an inside job
jasonmhc 2 years ago
Other steel framed buidlings? Let's see, there was the Kader Toy Factory & there was McCormick Place. Now, be warned that these are very different buildings from WTC 7 but you simply said steel framed buildings and they were indeed steel framed and they did indeed collapse from fire.
The 3 buildings didn't come down at freefall speed. In the case of the twins, it's easy to see the ejected debris falling faster than the buildings.
PoetryHound 2 years ago
the reason the debris fell ahead of the towers is becasue the debris was propelled by force and momentum surely your werent dumb enough to miss that point. im not even going to address the toy factory comment. the tower architects and saying the towers were designed to withstand multiple aircraft strikes. everyone who views the building 7 footage can say the fire damage is minor if not insignifcant in a building that size, certainly not bad enough to warrant demolition.
jasonmhc 2 years ago
If there had been a blast, it would propel debris OUTWARDS, so when trajectory becomes straight down it is falling at freefall speed, not FASTER than freefall as you are suggesting. Yes, Kader and McCormick were steel structures that collapsed from fire. No building can withstand 500 mph planes used as missiles; chief structural engineer said they only considered slow plane. How can you tell how much fire damage there is in the interior areas from watching a video of the outside?
PoetryHound 2 years ago
@PoetryHound Who do you work for ;)
Don't protect your masters... planes cant be used as missiles because the lack of explosive material... the mayority of the fuel in the planes consumed itself with the explotion. And you cant melt structural steel with airplane fuel... you do it with Thermite ;)
iluvj00 1 year ago
@iluvj00 He meant figuratively used as missiles. I know you know what a plane looks like. At 500 mph, there's not much that can withstand that. Also, where did you get that structural steel was melted in the WTC?
fafnir242 1 year ago
@fafnir242 man you can see the pics from the rubble, the structural steel columns is cut in 45º angle and with evidence of melting, plus the whole site had RIVERS OF MELTED steel in the inside, its been YEARS since that i can't believe people still argues the evidence, ignorance is not a bliss, and lazyness in research isnt either.
iluvj00 1 year ago
@iluvj00 The columns were cut during cleanup after the towers collapsed. I also have yet to see video of picture evidence of rivers of melted steel. If you can produce such evidence, please do so. If not, then stop talking.
fafnir242 1 year ago
@fafnir242 you will eat everything your masters feed you, turn the tv off and sto repeating what CNN tells you... wake the fuck up.
iluvj00 1 year ago
@iluvj00 I don't watch CNN. I found a video on YouTube that shows part of the cleanup process, and the guy was explaining that they were cutting down the columns in the manner that you have seen and claimed was melted by thermite before the collapse. I am not one of the sheep you claim me to be. I do my own research and then come to a conclusion myself. I'm a little insulted you think I am incapable of doing so.
fafnir242 1 year ago
@fafnir242 I don't believe you are a moron, I just think that you lack the experience on the subject (from tons of points of views and documentaries and articles debunking the official story, not even mentioning top officials from all around the world have talked about) so the point is that the possibility of accepting the official story as real is out of the question my friend (the official story bends the laws of physics in every way possible) . What you saw is justifing the 45º thermite cut
iluvj00 1 year ago
@iluvj00 watch?v=ySHgiUxnLC0
fafnir242 1 year ago
@fafnir242 :P man don't believe in montage... im in movies and im pretty good with rhetoric... the worst thing in this life is to justify... even in art... you gotta go deeper than that man.
iluvj00 1 year ago
@iluvj00 And any other comment or report you see, because what the elite does is JUSTIFY everything so you believe them.. so you say "ahhh ok that was it, ok!" and go on with your life while they fuck us all up. Know your enemies man they dont hide anymore they do their deeds in broad daylight.
iluvj00 1 year ago
too much poison dust and bad breath health
bestamerica 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fuck me just like 911.
jasonmhc 2 years ago
And you know why? A controlled demolition uses gravity to destroy the target: The building essentially crashes on itself. Just the same effect occured when the columns got melted by the jet fuel ignited fires. The impact itself got absorbed pretty well, the fire killed it.
The reason why it takes weeks and months to prepare a demolition is that it mustn't go wrong IN ANY SINGLE CASE. Otherwise, the company may be held responsible for billion dollars damages and the loss of human lifes.
Selinja 2 years ago
You got it mostly right, Selinja, except for the fact that that the fires didn't melt the steel. They WEAKENED it.
PoetryHound 2 years ago
Garfield must've stuffed Nermal in there at the last minute.
CaptMARNEY 2 years ago
cool
taylorbruney 2 years ago
Well atleast they tried. lol
AF6H4N1ST4N 3 years ago
yeah like those hoses really keep the dust down dont they lol
jasonmhc 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Just like the world trade center in NYC eh ... so much bullshit as it WAS an inside job !!
MasterMark123 3 years ago
It was very different: notice the sound of the explosives.
The WTC would have needed several times more explosives. Yet no one hears anything.
r0ck3tsm0k3 3 years ago
And it would've taken months beforehand to even rig the explosives in the first place.
parrot201 3 years ago
actually there were numerous eye witness acounts of hearing explosions by firefighters and news personal, not trying to start anything just go ahead and look it up
j10mo 2 years ago
hundred thousend kg dusk versus 1000 liter ware hahahaha
dogukaan 3 years ago
you should have played it backwards too
Termereion 3 years ago
the water was to help keep the dust down idiots
xxconanxx2000 3 years ago 25
@xxconanxx2000 lol, didnt look like it did much.
hvguy 1 year ago
@xxconanxx2000 i see water won't work there..dust keep growing..Lol
SchneiderVesperine 1 year ago
@xxconanxx2000 ha ha very good!
dmuse1981 9 months ago
@xxconanxx2000 well it didnt really work
KEVDOGK1M3 5 months ago
well
akroaggie 3 years ago
This was filmed from the top of the building next to where I live.
I watched it from street level - was a great experience to see it!
flymajj 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The water was like pissing on a forest fire.
FLY2SXM 3 years ago
rofl it was to keep the smoke down idiot
cj3022 3 years ago
wow i been in that building.
indianmaluji 4 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i think this is in saudi arabia
cool ya the water was funny
garycalgary 4 years ago
abu dhabi is in the united arab emirates :/
klipsch21 4 years ago 8
it was the first building to be demolished in the whole country
mankind4ever 4 years ago
im pretty sure there were a couple in dubai before this one
klipsch21 4 years ago
Boy, the water really helped... :/
buybygb 4 years ago
Guess I won't see this building the next time in in Abu Dhabi on the 17, Aug. Oh well! JV
JeffVell 4 years ago
COOOOOL
xbushi 4 years ago 2