People can experience joy without pain. That caller apparently isn't aware of people who can not feel pain at all yet still feel joy. He's speaking mystical, mumbo jumbo bull crap.
@HybridD91 ''That caller apparently isn't aware of people who can not feel pain at all yet still feel joy. He's speaking mystical, mumbo jumbo bull crap.''
People who get through their ENTIRE LIVES without experiencing any suffering AT ALL sounds like 'mystical, mumbo jumbo bull crap' to me. If not X (sentience) then not Y (deprivation) and not Z (suffering). Homo sapiens are irrational and emotionally driven animals. We're like a sentient scum that coalesced on the surface of this planet.
A question for humanity. In a world where there's no proof of God's existence or of life after death; how will you explain to your children why you brought them into the world and why they will have to die?
I have a very different philosophy that is derived from the same central principle that life=suffering. Perhaps it will help you to inspire purpose and meaning in your own life. Let me know what you think.
It's the video on my channel called "The Meaning of Life".
When I die, if I were to meet a god-like authority who would offer me the opportunity to live a second time around, as whatever character I chose --as if in a casting for a theater play-- I would perhaps be tempted to try to satisfy my curiosity by choosing to live at some future date, but after careful pondering I believe that my answer would be: "Thanks, but no thanks". All things considered --pleasures and pains-- it is better not to be born at all.
I want to ask this man a question... What's the purpose of antinatalism? Is it to cease suffering? What about all the other animals on this planet? They'll suffer too? What suffering have we ceased when animals are just going take over our environment and breed?
@jakegamesnake If we got to the point where we agreed about antinatalism on a large scale, then we would start taking measures to prevent the future reproduction of other sentient species as well.
The irony is this man who feels he is not qualified to be a father, by virtue of the fact that he possesses the self-consciousness to realize that he is not qualified to be a good father, would probably make a much better father than the men who, without examination, think they do. Or don't think at all.
@eschatonicus there is MUCH to be said of humility, its correlated to IQ, crime rates and a humble nature is a constant guilt pang of need to improve life for yourself and others - i can get very racial in outlining this kind of study of man, but suffice it to say in the environmental regard it has its own loop of reason: go to VOLUNTARY HUMAN EXTINCTION MOVEMENT online: second section: BIOLOGY AND BREEDING and click on the third question - its hilarious by so true!, and really quite stark!
@functionalist972 I'm a big fan! I can't find much to fault in what he says AT ALL. He has been an influence and an inspiration to me I'm happy to admit. My views on antinatalism, however, were pretty much solidified after I read David Benatar's book a few years ago. I've also read Schopenhauer and Emile Cioran; participated in long debates on philosophy forums and read up on philosophy, cosmology, evolution, the singularity, quantum physics and many other relevant subjects.
@DerivedEnergy and what about the most obvious one, the ecology? got any good fear mongering literature on overpopulation? NEGATIVE POPULATION GROWTH has been one of my favorites...
a) Two potential parents decide not to have a child but If they had have had that child the child would have had the greatest possible life imaginable. Now...do you consider that the child's interests were thwarted in any way? b) Two potential parents decide not to have a child but if they had have had a child that child would have had the worst possible life you can imagine, Has a catastrophe been averted by the parents deciding NOT to have had that child?
a) "Greatest" (in the emotional sense) is a sentient concept. The nonexistent aren't sentient, and so don't have any interests to thwart (like the child you didn't have at age 15, for example).
b)Yes it has been averted. That child WOULD have been sentient, and so had had interests to thwart. Complete thwartation would have been catastrophic. Because the child didn't exist, the "child" "has" no interests to thwart.
@filrabat I agree with you, my friend. I'm a fellow antinatalist myself! I've seen some of your views on antinatalism somewhere and you express yourself well. I have respect for you. (High five)
People can experience joy without pain. That caller apparently isn't aware of people who can not feel pain at all yet still feel joy. He's speaking mystical, mumbo jumbo bull crap.
HybridD91 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@HybridD91 ''That caller apparently isn't aware of people who can not feel pain at all yet still feel joy. He's speaking mystical, mumbo jumbo bull crap.''
People who get through their ENTIRE LIVES without experiencing any suffering AT ALL sounds like 'mystical, mumbo jumbo bull crap' to me. If not X (sentience) then not Y (deprivation) and not Z (suffering). Homo sapiens are irrational and emotionally driven animals. We're like a sentient scum that coalesced on the surface of this planet.
DerivedEnergy 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A question for humanity. In a world where there's no proof of God's existence or of life after death; how will you explain to your children why you brought them into the world and why they will have to die?
QuestionForAtheists 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have a very different philosophy that is derived from the same central principle that life=suffering. Perhaps it will help you to inspire purpose and meaning in your own life. Let me know what you think.
It's the video on my channel called "The Meaning of Life".
jlhe2011 2 months ago
All those wankers saying bullshit about how good is life and that we owe our existence to god.
GG retards, GG.
faunos51 3 months ago
He is right, and if you have the urge to "take care" of a child: adopt, there are enough to go round. :-)
panthera50 4 months ago in playlist Antinatalism 5
When I die, if I were to meet a god-like authority who would offer me the opportunity to live a second time around, as whatever character I chose --as if in a casting for a theater play-- I would perhaps be tempted to try to satisfy my curiosity by choosing to live at some future date, but after careful pondering I believe that my answer would be: "Thanks, but no thanks". All things considered --pleasures and pains-- it is better not to be born at all.
wkboonec 5 months ago
Comment removed
Metalheadtill1die 6 months ago
What a brilliant guy. I have never heard such compassion before. He is excellent.
PeterRoeder31 7 months ago 2
has der ever been a country or vast society that collectively embraced AN and outed themselves out of this life?
im10pplok 7 months ago
I want to ask this man a question... What's the purpose of antinatalism? Is it to cease suffering? What about all the other animals on this planet? They'll suffer too? What suffering have we ceased when animals are just going take over our environment and breed?
jakegamesnake 8 months ago 2
@jakegamesnake If we got to the point where we agreed about antinatalism on a large scale, then we would start taking measures to prevent the future reproduction of other sentient species as well.
ShockOfLemonade 6 months ago 3
The irony is this man who feels he is not qualified to be a father, by virtue of the fact that he possesses the self-consciousness to realize that he is not qualified to be a good father, would probably make a much better father than the men who, without examination, think they do. Or don't think at all.
eschatonicus 9 months ago 17
@eschatonicus there is MUCH to be said of humility, its correlated to IQ, crime rates and a humble nature is a constant guilt pang of need to improve life for yourself and others - i can get very racial in outlining this kind of study of man, but suffice it to say in the environmental regard it has its own loop of reason: go to VOLUNTARY HUMAN EXTINCTION MOVEMENT online: second section: BIOLOGY AND BREEDING and click on the third question - its hilarious by so true!, and really quite stark!
glorp896 8 months ago
@eschatonicus There is a book in my native language (Portuguese) about antinatalism entitled "Because I love you, you will NOT be born!"
Esgaravatador 3 months ago
@functionalist972 Oh, I also have a degree in psychology as well which helps A LOT!
DerivedEnergy 9 months ago
@functionalist972 I'm a big fan! I can't find much to fault in what he says AT ALL. He has been an influence and an inspiration to me I'm happy to admit. My views on antinatalism, however, were pretty much solidified after I read David Benatar's book a few years ago. I've also read Schopenhauer and Emile Cioran; participated in long debates on philosophy forums and read up on philosophy, cosmology, evolution, the singularity, quantum physics and many other relevant subjects.
DerivedEnergy 9 months ago
@DerivedEnergy and what about the most obvious one, the ecology? got any good fear mongering literature on overpopulation? NEGATIVE POPULATION GROWTH has been one of my favorites...
glorp896 8 months ago
Let me ask a couple of questions:
a) Two potential parents decide not to have a child but If they had have had that child the child would have had the greatest possible life imaginable. Now...do you consider that the child's interests were thwarted in any way? b) Two potential parents decide not to have a child but if they had have had a child that child would have had the worst possible life you can imagine, Has a catastrophe been averted by the parents deciding NOT to have had that child?
DerivedEnergy 1 year ago
@DerivedEnergy
a) "Greatest" (in the emotional sense) is a sentient concept. The nonexistent aren't sentient, and so don't have any interests to thwart (like the child you didn't have at age 15, for example).
b)Yes it has been averted. That child WOULD have been sentient, and so had had interests to thwart. Complete thwartation would have been catastrophic. Because the child didn't exist, the "child" "has" no interests to thwart.
filrabat 1 year ago
@filrabat I agree with you, my friend. I'm a fellow antinatalist myself! I've seen some of your views on antinatalism somewhere and you express yourself well. I have respect for you. (High five)
DerivedEnergy 1 year ago
Comment removed
JCJCJC1000 1 year ago
Comment removed
JCJCJC1000 1 year ago
Comment removed
JCJCJC1000 1 year ago