Indeed? what your doing is a retro fit, I wonder how many times you had to fudge the wording to makle your holy hand book fit the scientific facts.....
Oh and by the way I've seen much the same kind of BULL done with both the quran and the book of mormon. so Overall FAIL
yes i realized that afterwards, thank you and no the bible was not pure when it was revised in english, it was pure from the beginning and maintained its integrety in all 7 translations of the textus receptus.
You need to study biology. It negates Christianity
HighCardWins 1 year ago
Science says the earth is billions yrs old not millions.
HighCardWins 1 year ago
Indeed? what your doing is a retro fit, I wonder how many times you had to fudge the wording to makle your holy hand book fit the scientific facts.....
Oh and by the way I've seen much the same kind of BULL done with both the quran and the book of mormon. so Overall FAIL
TheEnglishAthiest 2 years ago
It take you almost 7 minutes to get to the point.
For crying out loud man..
Vogter2100 2 years ago
For someone who thinks the Bible wasn't 'pure' until it was written in English, you could at least have spelt 'baptism' correctly.
jashugan1 2 years ago
yes i realized that afterwards, thank you and no the bible was not pure when it was revised in english, it was pure from the beginning and maintained its integrety in all 7 translations of the textus receptus.
billraymond4766 2 years ago