If you don't need your dice to have all these (amazing) properties, what's the most convincing odds-difference you can create by choosing the right numbers for the dice?
That is remarkably great shit. I'm imaging situations where I could have friends choose a color . . . though, I think they would catch on pretty quickly that I was screwing with them. Eventually, I fear they would challenge me to a true game of chance, and that's not what we what, is it? I guess it would be time to go, at that point!
I like a die with four 5s and two 1s, a die with four 3s and two 4s, and a die with two 6s and four 2s. The odds work out differently, but the same rules apply with both sets of one and two dice. I wonder how many different sets of these dice can be made.
@GetMeThere1 1. I'm really bad at justifying things using 'real life', but you can think of nature as a non-transtie chain. It is something we want to avoid in elections. There's probably something really convincing I can't think of.
2. Patterns don't hold for triples etc. It's quite a balancing act, and these were carefully designed so a pattern held when you doubled the dice. But it's delicate so there's no particular pattern to what beats what after that.
Wow adding an extra dice flips the cycle. And you turn that into a game. It's amazing how the numbers really fit together, after alot of designing for a 5dice game let alone a 3 dice game.
@Horinius The set of three dice go way back to the original paper on the subject in the '70s. I spent some time designing the set of 5 to do what I want it to do. That is a tricky balancing act.
This is amazing! I'm going to have to make all these sets you showed. One question, though... if you start rolling doubles of dice, you start getting bell curves. Does the probability of one set of dice beating the "lower" set increase with the more dice you use in the set?
@kkriegg No it lowers! And with the three set of dice the probabilities reverse order so if A beats B with a greater than 50% probability, two As beat two Bs with a less than 50% probability. I wrote an article with more details linked in the description.
This video seems to fail at its goal, particularly with the probability calculation.
The exact probabilities are irrelevant. What we are interested in is how to construct non-transitive dice, which you invited us to do, but provided absolutely no clue how to do it. (And is blank zero or wild?) The probability calculation suggests a brute-force trial and error approach, which is a waste of time.
Non-transitive dice should have some properties that can be communicated. What are they?
@rg0057 Aren't you a grumpy-drawers. The constructions for 3, 4, and 5 dice sets are on the screen. If you want a general construction for n dice, there's quite a dull one that would work for up to 6 dice, but I don't think that would add anything to the sets I've already shown you.
I do not know of any other general construction of non-transitive dice - which is why I don't mention any, they are not easy to construct, which is why finding the set of dice I describe is interesting.
@rg0057 By using straight algebra and a spreadsheet to calculate all the probably outcomes of each game, you could make a set of x n-sided dice... I think. Not sure how to solve if possible.
I did some calculations, and with the one dice example, he had a 4/9 chance of winning on any roll, with the 2 dice example he had a 155/324 shot of winning on any roll. He had larger odds than either of the other players, so in the long run he should win.
While interesting, I wonder what rules you actually have to play with to win the 3 person game. It seems like it makes you more likely to win a 1 on 1 game with either of them, but I imagine you're odds of winning against both of them are less than 50%. In fact, it might be possible that if you just give a point to the highest out of any of you, that you aren't even the favorite.
I dont know how to design these games, but surely if you can do a 3 player system, you its probably possible do a 4 player system or an n player system?
I honestly don't know why that professor had to do a probability tree to find the R>Y ratio. Suppose dice R has all 3's, the R>Y chance would be 1/2. Each 3 has a 1/2 chance of winning, when the 3 is changed to a 6, it will have a 1 chance of winning. Thus P (R>Y) = 1/2 + 1/6 * 1/2 = 7/12. Ditto with Y>G, it's symmetric, so I hope he didn't do a tree on that.
Is it signficant that, in the case of the original three dice, that the sides of all three dice add up to 21? This doesn't appear to be the case for the other games presented.
This is an interesting case of natural properties defying immediate intuition. It's tough to argue that the counterintuitive non-transitivity is false while immediate intuition is true. But lately I've been arguing that Cantor's non-intuitive work may actually not be as correct as it is accepted to be. I made a video titled "Does Counting Exist?" to illustrate this point. It might be a good idea for legitimate mathematicians to correct any errors in the video.
The green dice vs the red dice is the most interesting when you throw two of each. As the green dice has 5 fours and the red dice has 5 threes so it seems intuitive that green will usually win. However because red will win if green rolls any ones or if red rolls any sixes the actual odds of red winning are 1 - (5/6)^4 = about 52%.
@Gnomeslayer778 I've tried to fix that problem with the Maths Gear version. Using the colours, one chain is ordered alphabetically, the other chain is ordered by word length.
@weldmaster80 poor geeks of yesteryear don't have friends while all other nerds do.
It's important with friendship it will make you have something to do when not doing homework and someone else than your chainsmoking mother to entertain you while sick.
I always love your posts. I have 3 years left of undergraduate in statistics left. I'm unsure whether I want to be an actuary or go for a PhD. I have the same passion for math that you have..Take care.
You know, it was this sort of thing that inspired me to study Maths at university. It's been a couple of years since I graduated. Maybe it's time to get back in the saddle and apply for that PhD.
You suggest to play ten games, but I tried this out en ten games seems not enough therefore I now play 20 games which is better. However I wonder how many games I should play to be 95% certain to win?
Just thought I'd post that I requested this a while ago after seeing the ScamSchool episode about non-transitive dice. Thanks for taking the suggestion in such an awesome way! Could you please explain why there is a dotted line instead of an arrow between the white and the red in the "Two Dice" diagram near the end of the video?
@pirsquared99 That's right. I had a few requests for this, especially after the Scam School episode - which is very good, people should check that out too. Yes, as you saw, the dotted line means it's about 50-50, the chances are slim in that case.
@paunchyjoe You actually can use Dice as the singular as well. (Depending on where you are in the world is why most people think not, in other places to say Die is not proper)
@WhiteDragonTile Yeah, sorry, full credit to WhiteDragonTile who challenged me in the first place (this is an updated version of the dice, these are better).
@leungclj haha, have a look at the article in the description. I mention a game for three players that uses seven dice. But it's a trade, if you try to do it with fewer dice you'll have to add something in elsewhere, like I did with my extra rule.
@Mandrake1942 they dont nerd any rules...they just pick you just think and then pick the better one...and win.....what he told to us is something your friends should not know -.- how stupid are you...
@Mandrake1942 it doesnt mater if im a troll ...cause you are a fucking moron ...id much rather say you are the troll ..you are the one who is making stupid instuilting comments on the internet....looks like that is the only thing you enjoy since that comment was so full of passion ....now go get a life or just easier go kill yourself you fucking moron
@snakeddj why would i kill myself #LOL ? you dumb fuck , and as for the insulting comments on the internet you started that with your first comment where you called me stupid i just like sometimes to reply to retard apes like you
@Mandrake1942 i called you stupid cause you are....read your first comment and you should see...oh i forgot...you are stupid you dont understand that...i feel sorry for you ...so ill just leave you to argue with yourself ...
That's quite cool. However, I usually love games like this where I will always win but this one I think is too much trouble to remember and to get the dice. But as I say, well done, it's all very clever!!!
This has been flagged as spam show
If you don't need your dice to have all these (amazing) properties, what's the most convincing odds-difference you can create by choosing the right numbers for the dice?
wildsabes 5 days ago
Comment removed
wildsabes 5 days ago
7:23 ONE DIE
114Freesoul 2 weeks ago
That is remarkably great shit. I'm imaging situations where I could have friends choose a color . . . though, I think they would catch on pretty quickly that I was screwing with them. Eventually, I fear they would challenge me to a true game of chance, and that's not what we what, is it? I guess it would be time to go, at that point!
heyandy889 1 month ago
The singular of dice is die... I just thought you ought to know.
LudicrousPlatypus 1 month ago
Hi there, I was wondering how you designed these dice. Did you do it by trial and error or did you have a method? Thanks :)!
xxSichaye 2 months ago
I love the red die from the Efron dice set. It's like it's been designed for fatalists.
"Ah, you misthrown again! Could you be a bit more careful?"
*rolling*
"Three."
boumbh 2 months ago
amazingly smart. wow
decom1885 2 months ago
I like a die with four 5s and two 1s, a die with four 3s and two 4s, and a die with two 6s and four 2s. The odds work out differently, but the same rules apply with both sets of one and two dice. I wonder how many different sets of these dice can be made.
PEZenfuego 2 months ago
rock paper scissors lizard spock!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jonsoncao 2 months ago 3
THE SINGULAR OF DICE IS DIE!!!
tmaduct5 3 months ago
red?? not orange??
Kingjay144 3 months ago 4
6:29 And here was me thinking that Zac Efron was the one they were named after....=D
jlspma 3 months ago
Rock Paper Scissors Lizard Spock.
MissTrillianAstra 3 months ago 4
1) Is there a real world aspect (beyond the games themselves) of investigating and classifying transitive vs non?
2) Single, one direction; pair, opposite direction. What happens with triples, quadruples, etc. ?
GetMeThere1 3 months ago
@GetMeThere1 1. I'm really bad at justifying things using 'real life', but you can think of nature as a non-transtie chain. It is something we want to avoid in elections. There's probably something really convincing I can't think of.
2. Patterns don't hold for triples etc. It's quite a balancing act, and these were carefully designed so a pattern held when you doubled the dice. But it's delicate so there's no particular pattern to what beats what after that.
singingbanana 3 months ago
Comment removed
boonphoe 3 months ago
Wow adding an extra dice flips the cycle. And you turn that into a game. It's amazing how the numbers really fit together, after alot of designing for a 5dice game let alone a 3 dice game.
Great work
ChikoWhat 3 months ago
Damn, missed the Like button and pressed Unlike! :(
sorry
GoodLegoInventions 4 months ago
@GoodLegoInventions you can change it
tjv323 3 months ago
Very interesting, indeed! :)
Two questions: I understand that you created the last set of 5 dice. But the first set of 3 dice, was it created by you as well?
And how much time did you spend on conceiving the set of 5 dice?
Horinius 6 months ago
@Horinius The set of three dice go way back to the original paper on the subject in the '70s. I spent some time designing the set of 5 to do what I want it to do. That is a tricky balancing act.
singingbanana 6 months ago
@singingbanana
OK.... This time I've read through your article carefully and I've found a
*little* note written in *little* characters at the end of it 8-)
Gardner, M. "Mathematical Games: The Paradox of the Nontransitive Dice and
the Elusive Principle of Indifference" Sci. Amer. 223 , 110-114, Dec.
1970.
Is this the one you're talking about?
Horinius 6 months ago
@Horinius That's one of the early references that put the idea in the form of a game. The idea that such thing exists goes back a few years earlier.
References: The Paradox of Nontransitive Dice, Richard P. Savage, Jr. The American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. 101, No. 5 (May, 1994), pp. 429-436 and;
S. Trybula, On the paradox of n random variables, Zastos. Mat. 8 (1965), 143-154.
singingbanana 6 months ago
@singingbanana
Thank you :)
Horinius 6 months ago
It may take time, but I make the dice using normal playing cards. Mismag822 has a tutorial on how to do it.
gzierer 7 months ago
@ 7:56 hey its a pentagram
Chessmaster777 8 months ago
I calculated the possibility of victory of the red on the green when the dice are 4 (2 red and 2 green):
Red = 671/1296 ---> 51,77%
Green = 625/1296 > 48,23%
Great game! ;)
xXextraslastaXx 8 months ago
This is amazing! I'm going to have to make all these sets you showed. One question, though... if you start rolling doubles of dice, you start getting bell curves. Does the probability of one set of dice beating the "lower" set increase with the more dice you use in the set?
kkriegg 9 months ago
@kkriegg No it lowers! And with the three set of dice the probabilities reverse order so if A beats B with a greater than 50% probability, two As beat two Bs with a less than 50% probability. I wrote an article with more details linked in the description.
singingbanana 8 months ago
This video seems to fail at its goal, particularly with the probability calculation.
The exact probabilities are irrelevant. What we are interested in is how to construct non-transitive dice, which you invited us to do, but provided absolutely no clue how to do it. (And is blank zero or wild?) The probability calculation suggests a brute-force trial and error approach, which is a waste of time.
Non-transitive dice should have some properties that can be communicated. What are they?
rg0057 9 months ago
@rg0057 Aren't you a grumpy-drawers. The constructions for 3, 4, and 5 dice sets are on the screen. If you want a general construction for n dice, there's quite a dull one that would work for up to 6 dice, but I don't think that would add anything to the sets I've already shown you.
I do not know of any other general construction of non-transitive dice - which is why I don't mention any, they are not easy to construct, which is why finding the set of dice I describe is interesting.
singingbanana 9 months ago 2
@rg0057 By using straight algebra and a spreadsheet to calculate all the probably outcomes of each game, you could make a set of x n-sided dice... I think. Not sure how to solve if possible.
AdderSIG 7 months ago
Dice of satan!
DonAlonzo 9 months ago
Dice is plural for die.
just saying...
Borat711 9 months ago 2
I did some calculations, and with the one dice example, he had a 4/9 chance of winning on any roll, with the 2 dice example he had a 155/324 shot of winning on any roll. He had larger odds than either of the other players, so in the long run he should win.
zserf 9 months ago
While interesting, I wonder what rules you actually have to play with to win the 3 person game. It seems like it makes you more likely to win a 1 on 1 game with either of them, but I imagine you're odds of winning against both of them are less than 50%. In fact, it might be possible that if you just give a point to the highest out of any of you, that you aren't even the favorite.
zserf 9 months ago
This guy looks like a combination of Thom Yorke, Travis Pastrana, and Bill Nye the Science Guy.
gregarious24 9 months ago
So you just draw your die out of a bag and keep it hidden. Don't reveal til you both have your die. Then it becomes rock, paper, scissors.
ryazbeck 9 months ago
I can't seem to find any Efron dice online. Where did you get yours?
IB112 10 months ago
@IB112 A website called Grand Illusions sell them.
singingbanana 10 months ago
@singingbanana thanks man, keep up the cool mathematics.
IB112 10 months ago
that is awesome.
I dont know how to design these games, but surely if you can do a 3 player system, you its probably possible do a 4 player system or an n player system?
Artonox 11 months ago
This dice game reminds me of the manga Gamling Maverick Kaiji which I feel is pretty clever.
illustriouschin 1 year ago
nice video! btw: Spiegel = mirror, Halter = holder, so Spielgelhalter = mirror holder... it's German,...
chupan 1 year ago
Please tell me how to buy the Efron dice. Brad Efron is my uncle.
depewny 1 year ago
I saw a lecture by David Spiegelhalter today :)
Everyvideo123 1 year ago
so this is what bill murray has been up to for the lat decade.
djbiggyb 1 year ago
I honestly don't know why that professor had to do a probability tree to find the R>Y ratio. Suppose dice R has all 3's, the R>Y chance would be 1/2. Each 3 has a 1/2 chance of winning, when the 3 is changed to a 6, it will have a 1 chance of winning. Thus P (R>Y) = 1/2 + 1/6 * 1/2 = 7/12. Ditto with Y>G, it's symmetric, so I hope he didn't do a tree on that.
thenosa87 1 year ago
@thenosa87 He was trying to teach people how probability works. It isn't a competition.
singingbanana 1 year ago 38
@singingbanana haha. Yes, seeing that diagram made the basics of probability finally click!
Corporatist 9 months ago
I think it was more to demonstrate to the less mathematically minded people out there such as myself to make the knowledge more accessible.
Brothington 1 year ago
Is it significant that, in the case of the original 3 transitive dice, that all 3 dice have sides that add up to 21?
dahjelle 1 year ago
Is it signficant that, in the case of the original three dice, that the sides of all three dice add up to 21? This doesn't appear to be the case for the other games presented.
dahjelle 1 year ago
Whoa... This is really cool...
I might make these dice sometime... If I get the chance. ^^
shikamarusgirl17 1 year ago
I wish to one day be as smart as you, well done!
Saruman1000 1 year ago
0:27 guy wasnt impressed with your buisness card joke
Hr75 1 year ago
The Owl is hoo? Professor of what?
CogitoErgoCogitoSum 1 year ago
This is an interesting case of natural properties defying immediate intuition. It's tough to argue that the counterintuitive non-transitivity is false while immediate intuition is true. But lately I've been arguing that Cantor's non-intuitive work may actually not be as correct as it is accepted to be. I made a video titled "Does Counting Exist?" to illustrate this point. It might be a good idea for legitimate mathematicians to correct any errors in the video.
theboombody 1 year ago
Owl eats dice. Owl wins :)
andyroo24601 1 year ago 5
'tis witchcraft I say, look at that pentagram!
shirankao69 1 year ago
The green dice vs the red dice is the most interesting when you throw two of each. As the green dice has 5 fours and the red dice has 5 threes so it seems intuitive that green will usually win. However because red will win if green rolls any ones or if red rolls any sixes the actual odds of red winning are 1 - (5/6)^4 = about 52%.
wasteland44 1 year ago
@wasteland44 Yup.
singingbanana 1 year ago
I believe I saw this on Scam School a while back. Nice vid anyway. :)
crax83 1 year ago
1. He spelled the singular of dice right!!!
2. It's orange
3. He's a genius
HConquer 1 year ago
in...wain lol
darkdudironaji 1 year ago
but, us geeks dont have TWO friends, its hard enought ot find one that'll play with me
weldmaster80 1 year ago 90
@weldmaster80 Hahaha :)
singingbanana 1 year ago
@weldmaster80 I think the greater Feat would be to actually memorize which dice beats which >.<
Gnomeslayer778 3 months ago
@Gnomeslayer778 I've tried to fix that problem with the Maths Gear version. Using the colours, one chain is ordered alphabetically, the other chain is ordered by word length.
singingbanana 3 months ago
@singingbanana Oh, wouldn't have occurred to me to think of it that way Lol.
Gnomeslayer778 3 months ago
@weldmaster80 poor geeks of yesteryear don't have friends while all other nerds do.
It's important with friendship it will make you have something to do when not doing homework and someone else than your chainsmoking mother to entertain you while sick.
livedandletdie 1 day ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Rock, paper, scissors, lizard, Spock!
AutosuggestionJD 1 year ago 3
where can i get these dice?
crazyguitarist953 1 year ago
da-te batut daca nu stii barbut
Tolstoievsky 1 year ago
This is fascinating! Also, I miss David Spiegelhalter! I hope he posts some more in the future.
Error081688 1 year ago
I always love your posts. I have 3 years left of undergraduate in statistics left. I'm unsure whether I want to be an actuary or go for a PhD. I have the same passion for math that you have..Take care.
yalg22 1 year ago
definitely orange dice.
Bloodfox610 1 year ago
Turn on the Closed Captions.
SkitMan86 1 year ago
Interesting ...
Berntisso 1 year ago
You know, it was this sort of thing that inspired me to study Maths at university. It's been a couple of years since I graduated. Maybe it's time to get back in the saddle and apply for that PhD.
MrBoyuki 1 year ago
@MrBoyuki If you want to chat about it let me know :)
singingbanana 1 year ago
Very interesting video, very good :)
mujijibu 1 year ago
definitely trying this. my friends are the brightest bunch haha
1handkamehameha 1 year ago
@1handkamehameha arent*
1handkamehameha 1 year ago
lol the british way to remember the rainbow is much more valiant than the
"Roy G. Biv" of america.
squaltch 1 year ago
@squaltch Yeah, "Richard of York gave battle in vain" is more poetic! :)
singingbanana 1 year ago 4
@singingbanana Hahaha Thats is an awesome way! I'm gonna start using that in the US :)
fabiomist282 1 year ago
@singingbanana
You suggest to play ten games, but I tried this out en ten games seems not enough therefore I now play 20 games which is better. However I wonder how many games I should play to be 95% certain to win?
candideguevara 1 year ago
Interesting :O
wishmastter2 1 year ago
yellow is my favourite color too
tomnotass1 1 year ago
3 dice game???
TheKrazykool809 1 year ago
so now we have three players lol gotta make those dice so I can beat someone whenever I need to fix my mood
Moorich 1 year ago
Scratch that. I just noticed the note next to the dotted line. It appears that this one is closer to 50-50.
pirsquared99 1 year ago
Just thought I'd post that I requested this a while ago after seeing the ScamSchool episode about non-transitive dice. Thanks for taking the suggestion in such an awesome way! Could you please explain why there is a dotted line instead of an arrow between the white and the red in the "Two Dice" diagram near the end of the video?
Thanks!
pirsquared99 1 year ago
@pirsquared99 That's right. I had a few requests for this, especially after the Scam School episode - which is very good, people should check that out too. Yes, as you saw, the dotted line means it's about 50-50, the chances are slim in that case.
singingbanana 1 year ago
your game is the dice version of rock-paper-scissors-lizard-spock!!! that's awesome
dammilo 1 year ago
@dammilo It is :)
singingbanana 1 year ago
@dammilo yeah, and it's a version with a twist, so you can always win, if u can choose the rules ( 1 or 2 dices)
Math Rules =)
fulvo 1 year ago
Brilliant video! (Also, nice waistcoat.)
Vonsen08 1 year ago
I think I'm going to show this in my math club
may I?
anubisxdmj0 1 year ago
@anubisxdmj0 Yes please.
singingbanana 1 year ago
'Die' is is the word for a single 'die'. 'Dice' is the word for other amounts of 'dice'. (zero and more than one).
Hope you take note of this in future video's :-)
Loved the vid!
FHomeBrew 1 year ago 2
@FHomeBrew Dice may also be used as the singular. Especially in casual conversation. So ner! :)
singingbanana 1 year ago
@singingbanana i think home brews right i dont think you can refer to dice as singular.
paunchyjoe 1 year ago
@paunchyjoe You actually can use Dice as the singular as well. (Depending on where you are in the world is why most people think not, in other places to say Die is not proper)
knuckaclo 1 year ago
@singingbanana Sorry, I'm just a grammar Nazi :p
FHomeBrew 1 year ago
This is incredible. Do you ever tour the Americas? I'd definitely come see your tour in say Oregon/Washington area.
Cazicten 1 year ago
David's acting skills are #WIN
Roshkin 1 year ago
is this the dice I asked you to make?
WhiteDragonTile 1 year ago
@WhiteDragonTile Yeah, sorry, full credit to WhiteDragonTile who challenged me in the first place (this is an updated version of the dice, these are better).
singingbanana 1 year ago
@singingbanana yes I've noticed, you fixed them so that the last two dice aren't equally matched. :)
WhiteDragonTile 1 year ago
this is interesting game theory, where A beats B which beats C, and C beats A, a bit like rock paper scissors in dice form! :)
dave597 1 year ago
@dave597 That's right, have a look at the full article in the description :)
singingbanana 1 year ago
you know eric personaly!??
Jargonaught 1 year ago
orange = red
Supreme4321 1 year ago
@Supreme4321 That's right, red is just an easier word to say when speaking quickly.
singingbanana 1 year ago
Ouch
TheCyber96 1 year ago
Nice explaination! I think they hadthis on scam school too.
markcallaway4ever 1 year ago
i have never been happy to get a lecture before and you sir are a genuine master of making the most advance stuff seem interesting
draconamous666 1 year ago
Very interesting. Thank you. It has got me thinking!
norrisonthespot 1 year ago
This is absolutely mind blowing...I've never seen anything like this..Thanks for sharing this Jim ~ !
ericsurf6 1 year ago 3
@ericsurf6 Glad you like it Eric. This should be right up your street. Try it out, they're easy to make or buy.
singingbanana 1 year ago
invent a game in which it doesn't require you to pick to rules of the game, so u can win every time
leungclj 1 year ago
@leungclj I might have done, but you didn't say please.
singingbanana 1 year ago 3
@singingbanana awwww, plzzzzz
leungclj 1 year ago
@leungclj haha, have a look at the article in the description. I mention a game for three players that uses seven dice. But it's a trade, if you try to do it with fewer dice you'll have to add something in elsewhere, like I did with my extra rule.
singingbanana 1 year ago
Cool game! It's the perfect game to play in Study Hall!!
supermonkeyballboy 1 year ago
all my friends will fall asleep before i finish explaining the rules
Mandrake1942 1 year ago
@Mandrake1942 You mean "pick a die". You need to get some better friends.
singingbanana 1 year ago 5
@Mandrake1942 they dont nerd any rules...they just pick you just think and then pick the better one...and win.....what he told to us is something your friends should not know -.- how stupid are you...
snakeddj 1 year ago
@snakeddj Shut the fuck up troll i didn't watch the whole video the first time you stupid fuck .
Mandrake1942 1 year ago
@Mandrake1942 it doesnt mater if im a troll ...cause you are a fucking moron ...id much rather say you are the troll ..you are the one who is making stupid instuilting comments on the internet....looks like that is the only thing you enjoy since that comment was so full of passion ....now go get a life or just easier go kill yourself you fucking moron
snakeddj 1 year ago
@snakeddj why would i kill myself #LOL ? you dumb fuck , and as for the insulting comments on the internet you started that with your first comment where you called me stupid i just like sometimes to reply to retard apes like you
Mandrake1942 1 year ago
@Mandrake1942 i called you stupid cause you are....read your first comment and you should see...oh i forgot...you are stupid you dont understand that...i feel sorry for you ...so ill just leave you to argue with yourself ...
snakeddj 1 year ago
amazing!
ICE1ICE2ICE3ICE4 1 year ago
This is brilliant!
I bet you've thought about many combinations of the numbers.
I'd like to send a message if I figured a new puzzle.
incunabulamagialtema 1 year ago
if there are three dice, willl it flip again?
charleybucketcdp 1 year ago
coolm ni knew how it worked but hey ho
alewisgb 1 year ago
That's quite cool. However, I usually love games like this where I will always win but this one I think is too much trouble to remember and to get the dice. But as I say, well done, it's all very clever!!!
08firthf 1 year ago
This is awesome and educating at the same time , be me teacher when school starts again please : D
KR1Nk 1 year ago
I Love You Singingbanana!
TheConstipatedcamel 1 year ago
Comment removed
TheConstipatedcamel 1 year ago