Added: 2 years ago
From: videoescaparate
Views: 35,352
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (45)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Eryxx bought the Turkish Armed Forces. trials appeared not to hit moving targets. useless. a blind missile

  • Enemy armor spotted!

  • distance??

  • Merkva tanks have a door at the rear the engine is at the front.

  • Abrams cant withstand side hits from RPG tadem warhead one Abrams was penetrated from the side by one.

  • @Mattc23q

    Well you've never seen a M47 then have you.

  • Look's identical to the M47 Dragon

  • waste of money

    nothing will change in the ground

    no one win in the war

  • Comment removed

  • i can use this at my enemy in our neighborhood...

  • Just use an RPG-7 (fire and forget)..... it even takes out an abrams tank.

  • @millenium2003 this is more accurate

  • @millenium2003 but you can 't fire it from inside a room without causing enjuries to allies in the room...

  • @albr00700  Not true anymore. They started using water to tamp and mitigate the effects from the back blast. Just like in explosive breaching shape charges. The new javelin can be fired inside rooms of average size now.

  • @millenium2003 rpg-7? abrams? you are uninformed, When i was on duty in Iraq - I seen a M1A1 withstand 18 direct hits from rpg-7 + rpg-18 and even a recoiless rifle in Basrah.

  • @Mattc23q lol i gotta ask how did you let it take 18 strikes...? lol really that takes time....

  • @Maximus5230 It was assisting in a raid in basrah, and it got hit on the track with a SPG-9 of some sort, not sure. then the local militia started taking pot shots at it with light at from all over the place,

  • Comment removed

  • @stalkingalizee Depends what warhead, the PG Series does rip holes in the side, but not deep enough to penetrate the cabin (3 inches)

  • Comment removed

  • @stalkingalizee AP and Shape Charge are practically opposites.. AP rounds are solid heavy metal construction and use kinetic energy to penetrate.. shape charged warheads are called HEAT, high explosive anti tank.. and they use a cone and a shaped charge to form a jet and penetrate armor with heat and kinetic energy.. One uses explosives, one does not. Noob.

  • Comment removed

  • @stalkingalizee Im well aware! Anything with a cone and a shaped charge is classified as High Explosive Anti Tank. Armor piercing rounds have no explosives. If youre looking for a general term to classify shape charge warheads as, armor defeating is more appropriate, AP is a specific classification.

  • @Mattc23q You mean a Challenger 2?

  • @Typhoon10UK No, M1A1.

  • @Mattc23q 12 Abrams was destroyed with RP7 warheads the oldest warhead of RPG7, the abrams pan is the weakest of all tanks.This is why US military put ERA on sides of the pan, 2 times was reported that just 1-3 RPG warheads destroyed tank just in view minutes. That is confirmed by your goverment.

  • @Talshet there hasnt even been 12 Abrams lost in combat, the Abrams DU layered armour is second strongest in the world, behind the Chobham armour on the British Challanger 2 tank.

  • @Mattc23q At first the Chobham armor with DU is called Dorchester armor. And your wrong. The better armor has the Leopard2A6 wich has about 2000 RHA turret against HEAT, the M1A2 has only 1600. And the Merkava is much more armored than Leopard2.You can armor a tank so strong you want portable weapons can penetrate them. Merkava the safest tank on earth was several times penetrate with RPG29 750 RHA. Abrams was several times destroyed by RPG7 with the oldest shell PG7 300RHA.show documentary RPG7

  • @Talshet The merkava is the safest tank on the earth because the engine is in front of the crew, RPG's can still disable the merkava, but because the huge hunk of an engine is front mounted, the crew are safe.

  • @Mattc23q Wrong, they try it but the merkava 4 has no engine infront read it. They just planed to do it but they use usual way and put the engine behind like all tanks.

  • @Talshet '"they took a centurion tank, and turned it around backwards - they put the engine compartment in front of the crew compartment"

    /watch?v=Kk-tUdJPET0

  • @Mattc23q

    you are such a layer, when I lived in Iraq when you were killing women and children I sow an Abrams destroyed by RPG 7

    by the way killing 1.5 million unarmed Iraqis is not a victory, you mother fucker

  • @aboodibrahiem Your such a poor speller, it is impossible for RPG to pierce through M1 armour, the Penetration isnt enough.

  • @Mattc23q Dont listen to whatever this kid has to say, im an Ex-Tanker. when we were deployed to Afghan back in 2008, one day my M1 took 15 - 20 RPG's, and other various Anti-Tank ordnance. no damage, no bullshit.

  • '

    which one this missile hit to the tank,,,

    tank top turret or tank body side

  • @bestamerica it's wireguided so it hits where you aim.

  • country??

  • @88ABRAMS88 FRANCE

  • Great Vid ..AWESOME !! ..thanks for posting :)

  • Incredible weapon. how does the Eryx compare with the Milan, Javelin, Konet and other anti-tank missiles/systems? Which is the best?

  • @Mojo1982 The eryx is not made to be compared with the Milan and the Javelin, it is a shorter range missile system.

    It's more like an advanced RPG.

  • Very nice mate thanks.

  • FENOMENAL! ME GUSTA! ES MANEJABLE Y SE PRESTA PARA ACTIVIDADES DE GUERRILLA...

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more