Information Existed Before DNA

[newperve]

Right so we can't produce new DNA with molecules. Then how exactly was _my_ DNA produced? Because before 1969 it didn't exist. Are you saying a mind sat down in a lab and produced my unique DNA code? Because it seems a lot more likely that molecules in my father's sperm and my mother's egg produced my DNA, advanced genetic engineering not being possible at that time.

[auritone]

Wow, so many fallacies in such a short time!

I'm impressed!

[auritone]

Wow, so many fallacies in such a short time!

I'm impressed!

[dirtydonki]

HEY EVERYBODY! In Case you didn't know, EVE O'Lution is a New Religion according to the Gospel of this complete idiot.

[dirtydonki]

It is sadly true. I share the world with a bunch of lunatic morons.

[AronRaHAHAHA]

@sculpt2live

Did you have a nice sleep?

Where you been?

[squishy121888]

O.o Wow. This is almost as retarded as down syndrome.

[ThePeterlockhart]

so forget the bible - proof of god according to this buffoon is in the websters dictionary - what an absolute idiot

[ThePeterlockhart]

who is this imbecile?

what a bunch of absolure crap

no education, no qualifications and absolutely no idea.

[Landofjello]

If this was on the real neph channel my comments would have gotten deleted by now.

[Xerock]

NF's lies in the first two minutes, more or less

0:27; 0:41; 1:25; 1:36; 1:45; 1:53; 1:56; 2:00; 2:03; 2:06;

Not only are these lies, but entirely unsubstantiated lies. Good liars will actually try to make their lie sound plausible. What's NF's excuse?

NF's case then is to use metaphor and pretend that if DNA is like a man-made code in one way, then it must be the same in all ways and thus, designed.

So, if a man is compared to a dog or a pig, then it must mean that all men have four legs.

[AronRaHAHAHA]

Great vid, Love this guy, he has hit the nail on the head.

You had best listen people, we did not evolve, we were made, it's the only logical commonsense level headed empirical rational explanation.

Godd stuff.

[Landofjello]

@AronRaHAHAHA

Dude, this is the worst video ever. Name one thing in it that makes sense

[AronRaHAHAHA]

Where do I start, no matter what I say you will throw it away.

For a start, can you tell me how a single cell could survive in an atmosphere which was poisonous to life? How could a single cell survive without oxygen and how could of it survived with owygen, as o2 would have oxidised it straight away and it would have died, go do an experiment, get a cell and see if it evolves, it won't, it would die. Stupid to think the way you do..

[Landofjello]

@AronRaHAHAHA

"Where do I start, no matter what I say you will throw it away."

You mean debunk it? It's a common phenomenon in an argument. This isn't religion in which people can just make claims and don't think it's not gonna get debunked you know.

"as o2 would have oxidised it straight away and it would have died"

if that was the case then archaea wouldn't thrive in highly acidic water, or survive living in geysers, or hot springs, wouldn't it?

[AronRaHAHAHA]

The first living oganism was not a archaea was it!

Wake up man, think about what you are saying before you write, you have not got any evidence for evolution, it's scientifically impossible.

[Landofjello]

@AronRaHAHAHA

"The first living oganism was not a archaea was it!"

Make up you mind, you said "a single cell", and I responded to what you said. Are you changing your claims to "first living oganism" now? OK then: Life was formed in water, away from O2, where it is H2O. O2 is oxidizing, but not H2O1. Are you going to change what you said again??

[AronRaHAHAHA]

Well it depends which evolutionist you listen to.

There are so many differing views on how life got started.

Creationists debunk one theory and then you guys have to go back to the drawing board and start again and come up with another stupid idea..

[Landofjello]

@AronRaHAHAHA

Creationists have debunked nothing. YOU made the claim thinking you've debunked abiogenesis, but when I debunked your claim, you CHANGED what you said. Now that you have nothing else to talk about abiogenesis, do you you want to get into evolution now?

[AronRaHAHAHA]

We know how life started and it was not in a pond!

If you think we came from soup then your a laughing stock, it's just as well more than 60% of the american people don't believe in evobullshit!

[Landofjello]

@AronRaHAHAHA

"more than 60% of the american people don't believe in evobullshit!"

lol and alot of people believe that suger makes a child hyperactive, and alot of people beleived (Some still do) that the earth is flat. Do you beleive the earth is flat?

[AronRaHAHAHA]

I want you to think about this answer carefully...Yes the earth was flat but the earth has always been round, there were no hills or mountains present, it was when we were hit from an asteroid strike which busted up the crust of the earth and this is where our fault lines came from, when the land mass was in one place called pangea the fault lines forced the land mass apart and formed the continants and the mountains.

[Landofjello]

@AronRaHAHAHA

OK, I've thought about it...What is the name of the asteroid? this sounds interesting...

[AronRaHAHAHA]

The earth is tilted at 23.5 degrees, true north is not the north pole, it has been moved by 23.5 degrees, in the Pacific just off the Mexico coast there is a huge impact crater, this could have been what hit us to start the whole land break up going, it seems like the earth has at some point wobled, scientist's can say when this event took place and they seem to think it was around 4,00 yrs ago.

[Landofjello]

@AronRaHAHAHA

what's the name of the asteriod?

[AronRaHAHAHA]

I do not know, scientist say it impacted around 4.500 yrs ago.

[AronRaHAHAHA]

A high-resolution map from NASA's Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM), released yesterday, has provided the most telling visible evidence to date of a 112-mile (180-kilometer) wide, 3,000-foot (900-meter) deep impact crater, the result of a collision with a giant comet or asteroid on one of Earth's all-time worst days. Just got this off the Nat Geo news..

[Foxhound606]

hmm interesting.

The article was actually from 2003. NASA's STRM released the findings for the crater you describe, in February of that year.

It's 2010 by the way, just in case you hadn't noticed (happy new year fucktard)

And this was estimated by scientists to be the K2 impact crater from 65 Million Years Ago.

Just copy&paste the dimensions Rahaha trolled and cross search with SRTM, it'll take right to the article in NatioGeo's website.

It's bad to lie Andy. and worse to lie badly.

[AronRaHAHAHA]

It was a copy paste thing, the date is not of any significance...

There does seem to be an impact of some magnitude in that area, are you saying that there's no crater there?

[Foxhound606]

LOL and a half

QQocky Boy you blatantly Lied in this claim. And now you're acting in your typical childish behavior now you've been found out.

The date is Very important; you made a claim that it was brand new, just yesterday. Either you're too stupid to make a basic check of your sources, or you thought no-one would have the simple reasoning to do a 10 second google search.

[Foxhound606]

This is how badly you fucked up.

The NASA report was released at the End of February 2003: that means that even if it was this year, it's two months in the future. That's Terry Pratchet level funny.

Of Course there's a crater there, that's the evidence you've Denied before of the impact 65 Million years ago.

[Foxhound606]

BTW to any of you reading the crazy world of AronRaHAHAHA, you may be amused to know you're in the presence of Potholer54's Golden Crocoduck Award Winner for Defiance in Ignorance Memorial Prize: AKA the QQOQQ (or Cock, it sounds the same anyway)

[AronRaHAHAHA]

I thought Banana man won?

Did I win, do I get a prize?

[AronRaHAHAHA]

I think foxhound's a secret christian...

He seems to know alot about the Bible.

[AronRaHAHAHA]

Good night foxy boy, I see you tomorrow.

Your my whipping boy! I kick your ass again tomorrow...

[Foxhound606]

hmm... trying to smear me with the taint of your own faith, because you assume all atheists will suddenly turn on me, instead of seeing the foghorn loud Lie you tried on them?

That's a pretty two-faced attitude toward a religion you hold so dear. Recant much?

[AronRaHAHAHA]

Did you know that athiesm is a religion.

How long have you been religous?

[Landofjello]

@AronRaHAHAHA

OK, let's say I agree with you that atheism is a religion, then what? What's your point? Are you just trying to say that we're just as dumb as you?

[AronRaHAHAHA]

It depends who's got the right religion.

It's obvious to anyone that this universe was not self made and self existing, it has order so I think I am batting for the right side.

You want to join our team, were recruiting at the moment..

[Landofjello]

@AronRaHAHAHA

So why can't atheism be a position of believe, like being a Democrat is a position of belief, or not believing in aliens is a position of believe?

[AronRaHAHAHA]

What lye's at the end of your road being an athiest?

What gain is there? If evolution were true then what's the point of living, we all going to die anyway so let's go and kill ourselves right now.

Can you see the hopelessness in being an athiest, I don't think it's God you hate it's the stupid pathetic christians that pretend to be christians.

Am I right?

[Landofjello]

@AronRaHAHAHA

.....I'll ask the question again since you just responded with a non sequitur: Why can't atheism be a position of belief, like how being a democrat is a position of belief, or not believing humans interacted with aliens is a position of belief?

[AronRaHAHAHA]

Athieism is a belief, you believe that there is no God, but you have to ask yourself the Q did I realy evolve from an ape? When the Geneologist's have told us that this can not happen.

Evolutionist's lie as well as creationist's, were all human, I guess you have read up on Heackel and Urey-Miller to name a few. Does that answer you Q?

[Landofjello]

@AronRaHAHAHA

OK, you answered the question, does that mean you agree that atheism is not a religon but a position of belief? BTW: Atheism has nothing to do with evolution what so ever.

[AronRaHAHAHA]

I know Athiesm has nothing to do with evolution but they do go hand in hand, I do not know of any Athiest who believes in creation but I know many who are raving evolutionist's, this helps back up the belief's. I think athiesm can be classed as a religion, we all got religion when we think about it, no one's on the fence.

[Landofjello]

@AronRaHAHAHA

"I do not know of any Athiest who believes in creation"

There are some religions that incorporate atheism, like Buddhism. just like there Christianity incorporate Democracy. There is a religion called Raëlism: they don't believe in any gods yet they believe in creation.

[AronRaHAHAHA]

There's a new religion made up everyday.

The main religion's Christian Muslim Judaism all have a common factor, they have the torah, this incorporates the 6 day's of creation.

I would suggest that they were nearer the creation event so it would make sense that they would have known more of it than us, all the major holy books have the same vien running through them.

[Landofjello]

@AronRaHAHAHA

OK, I did the research, turns out that the impact event happened 65 ma, but pangea was already starting to split 175 ma. So if my math is correct, this asteroid you speak of is 110 millions years late. Besides that, there is no major plate boundaries at the impact location, shouldn't the biggest plate boundaries be locate at the area of impact?

[cocopuff239]

i couldnt even watch the hole vid this guy is an idiot stop sucking the bibles nuts -_-

[caltrop69]

I used Websters to invalidate gravity the other day.

It's a brilliant tactic. I immediately floated away.

[christine13black]

how can smn be taken seriously when he lacks any knowledge on the subjects he adresses,any common sense, critical thinking and be full of criminally great ignorance and arrogance?and apart from all this he also looks like BTK!

anyone has an answer to my stupid questions?be my guest i'm open to suggestions!

[monkeypeopleofearth]

this is a trainwreck of truth

[EssentialPedagogy]

ALL fossils are transitional.

Evolution is fact because it's been observed.

You can't use a dictionary to disprove something scientific. Wtf was that about? WTF!

[byteresistor]

Could you quote what came after the line where Darwin mentioned the absence of transitional forms?

Sorry but quoting only the things that suit your pov does not win an argument for you.

[AronRa]

Curiously, you've repeated at least a third of the foundational falsehoods of creationism just in the first half of this video.

[melancholyid]

@AronRa

This was one of the most painful things I've ever had to watch. And I've been in Fallujah.

[MoveOrder]

Breathtaking ignorance about Darwin, the fossil record and DNA.

Completely (as usual) without evidence.

All in the same video.