Added: 3 years ago
From: kulavi4s
Views: 319,070
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (473)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @dominiquehoward amen bro lol

  • 0:40 wtc 2 swaying back and forth?

  • BEGINNING OF THE END

  • @Noodle2750 Yeah, it´s the end of Hasbro - world´s biggest Jenga was a total fail.

  • was this before or after Bush was teeing off...i cant remeber?

  • @BrokenMegaMan before, then he read a children s book. I heard he needed 1 hr just to get through the first page....

  • The only reporters that actually paid attention to the monitors while reporting.

  • @MikeyOProductions Word. It's really annoying how many reporters are constantly one step behind the viewers.

  • @GhoztProtokol well they have to be careful what they say i mean im sure inside thre thinking oh fuck no but i mean cant blirt that out

  • Photoshopped!

  • The engineer of 9/11 (Not Bin Laden, he was the financial part of it), some extremist Muslim (I can't remember his name at this point) came up with the plan merely to kill as many Jews as he could possible. Some of his friends said something like, "NYC has a lot of jews....the world trade center has a lot of jews". That's how it started. Sad, that this is all rooted mainly in the Jew-Palestinian conflict.

  • Bear with me for a minute.  When the video starts, the orange sky in the background, and the smoke looks so strangely beautiful. To all those who lost their lives, Rest in piece.

  • i choose not to view this as an end. but the begining. the begining of something new.

  • @theXtreme1man beginning of what?

  • @123212go well, the freedom towers r going up. NYC is going back to normal (thier type of normal) and it looks lyk a new chapter for America.

  • @theXtreme1man if things are going back to normal, how can it be beginning?

  • @123212go well, its a new type of normal.

  • @theXtreme1man beginning of what?

  • Awesome, plenty of construction work going.

  • indoor fires burn at 900~1000°C jet fuel (less volatile than regular gasoline) burns at 980°C Not hot enough to do what is seen here. Also like that guy says, this guy is a physics dr youtube.com/watch?v=qHqc8x-9L9­E

  • @galaxything

    Asshole. Go learn the facts.

  • @TheodorePike Think your the one that needs some facts idiot. Go learn some science oh wait "Gulible minds are immune to facts" LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL Or as an ex KGB once said "A facts mean nothing to a compromised and conditioned mind" This is clearly you!!

  • @TheodorePike and I see by your channel, all you do is abuse people. Get a life sad act!

  • best angle? ur fucking sick in the head

  • Ok I just watched this and I have a question :/ That top part of the building clearly isnt what is causing the rest of the building to collapse. That top part was actually going to fall sideways but because the bottom part is going down with it at the same speed the top part just goes down instead of side ways. So what the fuck is actually crushing the lower undamaged rest of the building :S

  • @galaxything, the exo-skeleton buckled at the bottom as the weight of top half of the building leaned. The entire frame of the building was hot and weak at this point. The WTC didn't have an internal frame skeleton like older buildings which is why the Empire State building wouldnt of collapsed floor by floor. Its also why these conspiracy nut jobs think it was a set implosion without ever researching the matter with their last brain cell.

  • @EastCoastDude99 I just seen a picture of one of the WTC towers when it was half built. It had a main inner steel frame structure that the outer part / floors all fixed too, there was no outer exo-skeleton. Also I found a pic of the sun shining through the towers (lovely shot) and you can see there is just a thick core structure and not much else, amazing picture. And thnx for responding much appreciated!

  • @galaxything, that thick core structure are the concrete floors mixed in with elevator shafts and emergency stairwells.. The building itself was supported by an Exoskeleton steel frame. The middle of the towers were not supported by an internal steel frame from in to out in the same fashion as older buildings such as the Empire or Chrysler buildings. Once the entire skeleton heated from burning jet fuel, the building basically melted and buckled at the bottom and collapsed (tower 1).

  • @EastCoastDude99 Hmm from what I have read about the buildings construction and with pictures and diagrams all official construction reports (from when the actual buildings were built) all say and show a core steel structure to which all floors were fixed and supported by an outer shell, this way the offices could be 'open plan' with no pillars or supports in the way. I'll say now I am no conspiracy nut, but I am rather perplexed at how an open fire melts construction heat treated grade steel :S

  • @EastCoastDude99 Also all of the building below the impact point was undamaged, yet still seem to just give way at free fall speed including WTC 7. I also saw a clip of one of the towers breaking up from the top down so that rules out the pile driver effect (top section crushing lower section) I read this h t t p:// uk. answers.yahoo.com/question/ind­ex?qid=20060916064546AAQpn2w that engineer guy explains it well I think

  • @EastCoastDude99 When I say molten metal im refering to the videos showing molten metal pooring out from the tower corners and various places. After reading up it seems jet fuel is actually less volatile than regular car gasoline when not compressed in a jet engine and you need a super hot blast furnace to make molten metal not an open air fire. Only explination is thermite like conspiracy people say :S

  • @galaxything Learn the difference between steel and aluminum, not all metal is the same. You know, periodic table of elements, knowledge, it's amazing stuff, try it out and shut the fuck up in the meantime.

  • @george120050 LOOL so you think an open fire an can make white hot molten aluminium and the footage i refer to shows the moten metal being created outside with no visible flames! I think it's physics 101 for you my friend lol

  • @galaxything You`re a bad joke at best. Drop dead.

  • @richter75 Eerm sorry but wtf!!!! I should drop dead for asking questions?? I haven't stated anything just asking and you respond with that? What a fucking freak you are!

  • These poor pepole had no idea what hit them.

  • best angle is the worst angle in my eyes :(

  • God is neutral, he is not your enemy or your friend.

  • "if something defys the laws of physics, then im not going to believe it entirely"

  • Has anyone else here seen and analyzed a tower ACTUALLY getting hit by a plane then ACTUALLY collapsing to compare controlled demolitions to the 9/11 footage? these conspiracy theorists find what seems like proof then follows it up using google &wikapedia and then puts their finding on youtube with big fancy words to make themselves seem smarter and disguise themselves as professionals,i guess they dont realize maybe there ARE people who hate America enough to flyplanes in to our big buildings"

  • The Planes initial hits knocked off the fireproof coverings of the steel T beams, now i dont know how smart you guys are, but when steel gets reallreallyreally hot from a fire like that, for as long as it was on fire, the Beams began to bend and flex. you cant have 2000 tons of steel and concrete resting on a few beams that are bending and flexing. the beams gave way and gravity took care of the rest of the tower. but you all are entitled to your opinons, i cant make idiots not be idiots

  • One word: nanothermite. A high explosive composite, manufactured at Lawrence Livermore, and analyzed in numerous dust samples with mass spectrometer and scanning electron microscope, amongst other equipment. Who rigged the buildings, and when, and how were the demolitions initiated from the same place the planes went in? How did 'al Qaeda' have access to Lawrence Livermore, and access to the WTC? They didn't. Inside Job. Period.

  • "best angle"? LOL

  • 9/11 = Inside Job !!! at second 0:47 you can see clearly the thermit-reaction

  • maybe you can't believe george bush did it, but i can, and i do believe that is who did it, they had those planes hit the buildings as a set up to make you think thats how they collapsed when in fact there were bombs places all over on the INSIDE of the buildings. hmm the american government wants FULL CONTROL, and they will stop at nothing to get it. the terrorist who is responsible for 9/11 is still alive. GEORGE W.BUSH, and anyone who believes otherwise had something to do with it too

  • Why didn't the bottom floors collapse first if it was demolished...?

  • USA creates terrorists and then stages attacks so they can pin it on them then gives them a reason to invade the country. Bin Laden was part of the CIA. People become terrorists when they see their loved ones die because of an unjust war...

  • f-16 fighter jet is worth about 20 million dollars, e3 sentry is about 270 million, one tomahawk cruise missle is 2 million conservatively, M1A1 abrams tank is worth about 5 million dollars... the wars are costing trillions of dollars... so youre telling me that defense contractors and military hardware manufacturers such as Raytheon, Halliburton and other corporations do not benefit off of war? NO WAR NO PROFIT! 9/11 WAS DONE TO GO TO WAR TO MAKE MONEEEEEYYY!!

  • @MrShane737 No. Granted Afghanistan and Iraq were to make money, but they both would have happened anyway. The history shows we were going to invade Iraq first, though. We invaded Afghanistan (half heartedly) because the evidence was clear. There's no demolition crew in the world that could have made such a clean (no detonation cord scraps) demolition to exactly start where a giant fire happened as a result of an impact. If anything, the impact would have destroyed any electronics.

  • @Enginmaster you think to bring down a building with explosives, you need one long cord strapped to all the other explosives? no, all you need are *separate* make-shift explosives strapped to the main cores at the base of the towers, and the main cores at the center.. remember the plane did not go through the main core of the building, it is impossible to do so since it is reinforced steel/concrete.. the WTC were also built to withstand even bigger jets, than the boeing 747..

  • @MrShane737 Nobody's mentioning what kind of specific device they think it is, specifically because each is testable, and any that would be proposed don't have evidence. If you're saying breaking just 1 more beam would do it, but the fire weakening of the structure wouldn't, you're insane. If you're not saying that, then there should be hundreds of caps, or timer igniters, etc. And why exactly did they start collapsing at the plane crash site, at the angle the plane hit? Not demolition, dude

  • The simulation from purdue showed otherwise. The core was compromised by the hit. The insulation gone from most of the beams there by the ricocheting debris. Numerous experiments show what the designers already knew, if you heat a fire around those beams for a certain number of minutes, they don't hold up the design load. You seem to have a lot of positive "can't have destroyed that" knowledge, that somehow trained structural engineers don't. Why do you believe that? It's your religion.

  • 9/11 was done by radical Muslims trained and hired by Al Qaeda which is directly linked to the CIA... 9/11 was done by treasonous criminals within the intelligence agency and top brass in the White House to carry out marshal law on the west and to form a New World Order, where the American economy will be destroyed and China will assert itself at the top.. the war is being lost not physically with guns and tanks.... but economically by the criminal FEDERAL RESERVE.. Obama is a puppet

  • Until then, I imagine you will continue to insult these very knowledgeable individuals with sweeping generalizations, all the while ignoring the piles and piles of evidence they have worked so hard to gather and present in clear, thorough, professional-grade presentations. I can say no more: it is the evidence that speaks for itself, and it is waiting and will continue to wait for you and the rest of the world.

  • Does Katie Couric have a soul?

    

  • But if that is somehow not enough for you, consult the hundreds and hundreds of 100% sane, serious, patriotic professional architects and engineers @ ae 911 truth . org for REAL SCIENCE : REAL INVESTIGATION : REAL JUSTICE

  • @bjdm3089 You are a perfect example of someone who once again relies on eye witness testimony and right away, instead of evaluating the claim, instantly agrees with it. What you are thinking, astonishingly, is that some invisible hand pushed the building away, having it fall NEXT to the bottom part. This is what you are suggesting. When something collapses, it can only go one way, with slight variations. Down straight ( an actual controlled demolition ), or down to one side, like in this video.

  • @Imaginos26 I'll tell you, I seriously considered not responding to you, but I've decided I must. Eye-witness testimony is clearly important when analyzing the destruction of these three skyscrapers; but you are simply wrong to say that that is all I rely on. I pointed you to ae 911 truth . org, which is brimming with real evidence supported by hundreds and hundreds of professional architects and engineers.

  • @Imaginos26 Thus, your calling all people who are skeptical of the official explanation as having "the lowest form of human intelligence" is both baseless and hateful. In fact, although I'm sure you will not believe me, I am a student at Harvard University, so I do not appreciate your name calling.

  • @Imaginos26 Now to address your assessment of the basic physics I presented: I am aware that a large part of the pressure the top portion is exerting is downward. It is true that a significant portion of that pressure would crush some of the floors below. What it cannot do is crush ALL 70+ UNTOUCHED floors below, in symmetric fashion, in something like 15 seconds. Resistance from steel prevents this. And if you think you have a formidable rebuttal to that, this conversation is beyond over.

  • @bjdm3089 1. Oh so you go to Harvard? Good for you. I'm sure you can get all types of people coming out of Harvard. So that's irrelevant. I was simply stating that your group represents a minority of people who are bent on advancing their own agenda, by taking advantage of certain unexplainable, or yet to be explained, OR explained but ignored aspects of the incident. So it is far from baseless. It is the lowest form yes. It's intellectual treason at it's best.

  • @bjdm3089 2. There is such a thing as being TOO skeptical. As such, the rational explanations, that eventually fill in the gaps, are ignored. Just checking the top 40 on your site shows that either they don't keep up with whats been learned, or they ignore it. The evidence that the people behind these movements use to back their claims has been proven to be either false, irrelevant, or not really evidence at all, as the majority of it is.

  • @bjdm3089 3. If you start to dig deep enough on the people behind these movements ( Steven Jones, Richard Gaga, James H. Fetzer, David Ray Griffin, to name a few ) you see that these people are conspiracy theorists, and have already "made up" their minds. They try to use their academic stature to support their claims (many not even in the right fields) and fail. That's why they have no merit or any respectable scientific consensus, except for their own little group perhaps.

  • @bjdm3089 4. You ask people to check out the "patriotic professional architects and engineers", digging into their emotions to lure them in. Why mention patriotism in that phrase at all if not to prove my point that these people are based on a priori. Patriotism in a case like this has nothing to do with unbiased research. It's quite the contrary. According to you, anyone including others in their field, who doesn't support their views is unpatriotic? Such arrogance.

  • @Imaginos26 Please show me precisely where I called those who have faith in the official explanation "unpatriotic." Calling a certain group "patriotic" does not imply that everyone not in that group is unpatriotic. I personally have had enough of your name-calling.

  • @Imaginos26 The fact of the matter is this: there are mountains of evidence which organizations like AE911Truth have made available to you, and you, like so many, have failed to address the actual evidence. The physical impossibility of a symmetrical collapse despite ASYMMETRICAL damage (no matter how grave); the billions and billions of iron microspheres found in independent dust samples; the presence of unreacted nanothermite in said samples; the molten metal found at the best of all three

  • These are the realities which you dismiss not on scientific principles but rather on your own prejudices and insults, such as throwing out the corroboration of hundreds of verified professionals by grouping them all as brainless conspirators who are hyper paranoid and impossible to satisfy. On the contrary, they are growing in esteem and number, and together with the grace of God they will lift the veil of ignorance the government has so masterfully laid on the eyes of the world.

  • @bjdm3089 When something falls down to one side, it is still falling DOWN above all. Try and grasp the basics of physics before making a claim like that, because it`s making your support for this `truth` scene only mirror the ignorance of your supporters. Your little clan represents the lowest form of human intelligence and seems to be proud to advocate ignorance. You think your group, or similar ones, are on equal grounds in this whole discussion and it provides me with good entertainment.

  • FALLING AWAY, he says, and the video obviously shows: FALLING AWAY. This immediately removes the possibility of the "the top portion of the building crushed everything below" hypothesis. IMMEDIATELY disproves the U.S. government's official explanation of the events of 9/11

  • People. Its in plane sight. this was an inside job.

  • Youtube "buildings demolished". I highly suggest to watch AS MANY as you can. It only takes half a brain to see two mind blowing important points. 1. The top of the buildings are always intact for the most part before they hit the ground AND the buildings go down bottom first. 2. The whole point of a "controlled demolition" is to contain the destruction, keeping it from even touching the other side or the street. Now after having watched all these videos, go back to the twin towers collapsing.

  • @Imaginos26 That's what I noticed. It seems in the case of 9/11, the lower parts of the buildings where simply brought down by the weight of the upper stories collapsing down on top of them. This is nothing like how a 'controlled demolition' works. My only questions are why did building 7 collapse the way it did? That one did look controlled. And why did the BBC report it's collapse 20 minutes before it actually happened? At least, that's what they say.

  • Amidst all the information and testimonies, it CAN be confusing. One thing i do try to avoid is eye witness testimony ( or ear ). In science (which is a system built on understanding) eye witness testimony is mostly ignored or doesn't have much merit. The mind tends to jump to conclusions before it has any amount of necessary information. The more you know, from every aspect, allows you to come to the most logical conclusion. Building 7 from what I've gathered had an odd structural design -->

  • @BloodOfRayne (part2) that wasn't the best design to withstand damage to its structure from fire and/or debri damage ( parts of the falling wtcs hit building 7, opening its side ). The core apparently was damaged enough. Firefighters assigned to that building were instructed to exit (pull) because the damage was enough to judge unsafe to be in or near. Shortly after, it collapsed from the damage. Seems how things work in reality.

  • @BloodOfRayne As for BBC reporting it collapse 20 min before it did. Maybe the information misquoted it collapsing as opposed to "going to collapse". Fires burning inside of it, and a huge hole on its side, it's only normal to assume it will happen. Eventually you get to the "breaking point" where the "one more column snap/bend, and it drops" more or less situation. Its obvious that the rest of the building will follow. But why go through all that reasoning when you can just say bombs did it.

  • was an easy position to be in. You don't have to know anything about anything to be in that position. Just watch the movies about it and all of the supporting websites and all of the sudden you're an expert....So you think. It's only when you see the people that support the conspiracy (ppl who make web-sites, crackpot radioshow hosts, and the kind of ppl i mentioned above) and then look at the other side, that you realized what an embarrassment it is to have been affiliated with them. --> 4

  • 2.his article was complete bullshit, to the point that it was such an embarrassment to have him there, that they laid him off. That's the best these truthers can come up with. There's more, but look it up for yourselves. There's plenty of other academically inclined people, but they have no expertise in the necessary fields required to establish any consensual peer-reviewed ( by engineers ) paper. I used to be a truther when all these movies came out just after the attacks. Why? Because it --> 3

  • A friend of mine was dangerously being indoctrinated into the whole conspiracy meme by a an acquaintance and 9-11 came up. It still amazes me that people are still trying to connect dots. The leaders of these movements have no academic background in the various fields involved with this. Steven Jones? Some guy who works in cold fusion writes an article out of his field, get its published in anything BUT a engineering journal. Actual engineering professors at his own university told him --> 2

  • fantastic angle. give us more angles. can you also give us a great angle of dead bodies falling to and the aftermath? FUCK YOUR VIDEOS NAME FOR RATINGS FUCK YOUUUU ALLL

  • Look at all you ignorant fools celebrating the death of osama bin laden. You're all delusional there is no evidence OBL had anything to do with 911 its all based on his confession video, hell I confessed to it too and nobody cares. THIS IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION THE STEEL CORE IS TO STRONG TO JUST CAVE IN

  • @pr3st0nx and your proof is?

  • @1988plg video evidence

  • @pr3st0nx From the outside you might want to rethink this if your only evidence for argument is youtube videos from crackpot conspiracy theories.

  • @1988plg I am not sure what you are referring to? This video is standard news footage bro it's not a conspiracy video. My argument is based on a vast array of scholarly writings including the book The 9/11 Commission Report Omissions and Distortions by Professor David Ray Griffin as well as peer-reviewed journal articles like Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe' from The Open Chemical Physics Journal and The Open Civil Engineering Journal.

  • @pr3st0nx what I was referring to was you spouting off conspiracy theories of a controlled demolition by using youtube videos as your evidence. Pretty weak

  • @pr3st0nx herp derp

  • fuck u OSAMA BURN IN HELL!!!

  • If you get to have a chance to got to either tower. Which tower would you be in?

  • David Chandler sits in his basement everyday skipping out on work as his family starves studying these videos like a compulsive gambler refusing to cash in the chips

  • from 0:05 to 0:16 you can see explosions creating puffs of smoke in a regular timed manner traveling downward. This is a camera angle I never saw before.

  • Matt gets it right when he notices the tower collapse and catie says can we go to the hospital for a live report?....lol i wonder why her show is being cancelled?

  • Yeah Osama Is dead but that will never bring back the horror or the people that had to Jump and the people who had to watch there Loved ones Die.

  • That Waz frigging awesome

  • Why the hell press 'Like' Button??!!

  • bin laden is dead, thank god

  • @ThEcaVeANtics Tim Osman 2?

  • @ThEcaVeANtics I hope your god is having fun killing innocents and then avenging them.

  • @ThEcaVeANtics Yeah, from now we won't have terrorisms, wars in middle east, suicide bombers and terrorist attacks, hooray!

  • @ThEcaVeANtics What does that matter? Someone else has already taken his place.

  • @ThEcaVeANtics hey dumbass bin laden wasnt the cause of 911 it was sheik muhhamad, bin laden just knew about it

  • @alyxoxxx hey dumbass, sheik muhhamd planned it, but Osama bin Laden financed and backed it. check your facts before you get into being a smartass

  • @ThEcaVeANtics oh so this is what happened? THATS the biggest problem you idiots have. PROVE IT. and nononnonoo this isnt a video of me not caring, ofc i care i was to young back in 2001 when these attackes happened but it just annoys me when people blame things upon other people without solid proofs. not story's told to you by the president.

  • @russkeller the real perpetrators got away huh? you mean the ones who died when they crashed their planes into the towers? or do you mean the one who planned it, who we have detained in Guantanamo, or do you mean the one who financed, backed, and took credit for it, which is the one we killed?

  • @ThEcaVeANtics The Real Perpetrators are the ones who had NORAD stand down holding the door open for the hijackers then did a controlled demolition on building 7 in plain view but big brother says 2 & 2 is 5 and you love him for it.

    Your being played like a fiddle

    newamericancentury . org / RebuildingAmericasDefenses . pdf

  • @ThEcaVeANtics Yeah, they kinda all owned up to it proudly so I really don't understand all this conspiracy shit either.

  • @skelterella Who owned up to it? All I sore was a video of Binladen owning up to it only it wasn't Binladen it was a guy that look only a little similar, chubby darker beard wrong hair etc... As far as I know that was the video used as proof he was involved but since then experts proved it was not him in the video. I am no conspiracy guy but that is a piece of info that I bumped into so thought you may like to know also. Think you can find it on here some where.

  • @ThEcaVeANtics thank god for making him too, right?

  • @ThEcaVeANtics but war continues soldiers die, blood for oil fuck that

  • @ThEcaVeANtics not god, Thank the Military

  • Respond to this video...  amen

  • @ThEcaVeANtics Maybe god is a Musleum and he hates America ? Ever think of that ? Thank god.

  • @fukinblowme there is no god, only fucked up in the head people who do such fucked up things like this in the name of their fucked in the ass cocksucking gay god. how much I fucking hate those imbeciles

  • @fukinblowme first of all it's Muslim, not Musleum. Second of all muslims didnt cause this. Islam is actually a very peaceful religion, its the radicals who go and twist the Koran to suit their needs that give the religion a bad name.

  • @ThEcaVeANtics ya think dipsh1t

  • This video clearly shows at 0:47 to 0:51 that the "piledriver" theory

    is a LIE. Nearly 1/2 of the floors ABOVE where the demolition begins

    are being demolished BEFORE any floors below.

    Newton's Third Law proves this is controlled demolition.

    "For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction"

    If the top part of WTC 2 falling by gravity is causing the demolition

    of lower part it should not be possible to see any intact structure

    below where the demolition begins at 0:51

  • it's the fault of the bad moslims, they are a mistake in the world.

  • This was the only steel structure that has collapsed in such a way. From what I can tell, the top half of the tower should have fallen over and left the lower half standing, or the entire tower should have fallen over, keeping the overall structure intact. The building fell as if in free fall. I'm not proposing that the U.S. gov was behind it, but there was more destruction involved than a plane.

  • PROOF OF CONTROLLED DEMOLITION!O:47 - 0:50 clearly shows that 1/2 of

    TOP part of WTC 2 is being demolished BEFORE part of building BELOW

    where demolition begins is being demolished.

    Newton's Third Law says:

    "FOR EVERY ACTION THERE IS AN EQUAL AND OPPOSITE REACTION"

    NO EQUAL AND OPPOSITE REACTION GOING ON THERE!!!

    how BRAINWASHED are you??? do you ACTUALLY believe that

    Newton's Third Law was suspended on 9-11-01?????

    this video evidence PROVES the so called "piledriver" theory

    is a lie.

  • @bIZAROsPRMN11 oh look! a Truther troll! he Netflilxed Loose Change! all bow before the douche god!

  • I like hoe people just commentate on live tv and not participate in helping out

  • Comment removed

  • @hickster699 who gives a fuck, child, adult same fucking deal idiot

  • realy JEWS are so Great for Creating DRAM . 

  • i hope alot of people died than what was reported. i hope americans all went to hell fast. i hope they only had a minute to pray for there death. death is best served cold, do you want some death. i will dance on the graves and spit on the grave of the dead. wtc bombing was awesome. i loved all the death

  • @bendmystep You're just a sick coward that doesn't have the balls to say stuff like w/o hiding behind your computer.Hell will be to good for you.

  • ...do you know what's REALLY unfortunate? How FUCKIN RETARDED all of you idiots are. 110 cameras from dozens of people there from a gigajillion different angles are TELLING YOU THE GLARINGLY OBVIOUS FUCKING TRUTH - WE WERE ATTACKED BY TERRORISTS WHO HIJACKED PLANES AND FLEW THEM INTO THE BUILDINGS. PERIOD!! Now step away from your computers and GET FUCKIN LIVES YOU DESPICABLE DISRESPECTFUL PIECES OF SHIT. 

  • Ascensiam , you say:

    "I also saw a theory with the floors causing a domino effect..."

    "a theory"? Interesting. At 0:46 - 0:51 you are looking at actual video evidence

    right in front of your face that disproves what you just said.

    The actual video evidence right in front of your face also disproves the

    so called "pancake" theory and the alleged "piledriver" theory.

    The video evidence right in front of your face is sufficient proof that the

    demolition of WTC was controlled demolition.

  • @bIZAROsPRMN11 u can even see the flashes

  • Is that Jon Bohner talking at the start?

  • Will that dumb bitch shut up?

  • I cant believe that some americans want a mosque at ground zero! Id think you were a terrorist if you want that! F#CK U @SS HOLES

  • @MEPenta

    Then your obviously narrow f#cking minded.

  • You can see the building collapse in the center where the impact occured. "Truthers" think bombs were planted in the towers. I don't see how that makes any sense. That, to me, is why it is the best angle. Not because I like what happened.

  • I dislike this video because i hate the terrorist not the video after i finish my training in the marines i will kill 3,000 + terrorist before i die

  • its too bad to see innocent people getting killed for nothing as a muslim i feel really sorrow for them who got killed in this attack terrorists have no religion they are devils who have nothing to do with any humanity & religion

  • holly crap wat a catastrophe !! fuck u taliban , al quaeda

  • ok... that building has collapsed... ääähm ... bob ... BITCH 0:50

  • I'm not going to say explosions, but does anyone else notice the dozens and dozens of 'pops' and 'flashes' staring just before and during the 'collapse' starting at about :45???

    Not to mention that molten material was pouring out just prior...

  • why did he call this the best angle is it amusing to him

  • Opps I meant *don't

  • The engineers and designers did an excellent job building the WTC. The building stayed strong for half an hour allowing 8,000 people to evacuate. When it collapse it went strait down, if it had fallen on it's side, half the city would've been wiped out. SO DO BLAME IT ON THE CONTRACTORS.

  • WTF i was in 2nd grade when this happend n i never saw the actual vid of the collapse unil now n I didnt c ANY PLANE WTF!!!!

  • @riversidemotown thats because the planes hit 10s of minutes before the collapse

  • Stop bringing Muslims into this. You don't even know if it was them or not. The reason Muslims are brought into this is most ppl feel better when someone is being pointed at rather than not knowing at all. I mean seriously I haven't been more annoyed at how shallow people can be.

  • R.I.P from Norway. im so sad for this and i hope all are rest in piece every single american im gonna fricking kill Osama Bin Laden

  • @Superzeldafanful You'll have to ask the CIA or Norway's version of that because he works for them. I don't think they will look very kindly on you trying to kill someone who can trace their bloodline all the way back to the pharoes of Egypt. Kinda wierd huh? So can George Bush and English royalty.

  • FAA destroyed 6 recordings of what occured the morning of 9/11 - One recording made at the New York Air Route Traffic Control Center, in Ronkonkoma, on Long Island, was later destroyed by an F.A.A. quality-assurance manager, who crushed the cassette in his hand, cut the tape into little pieces and dropped them in different trash cans around the building, according to a report made public today by the inspector general of the Transportation Department. [New York Times 5/6/04]

  • @Superzeldafanful hes dead now

  • @Superzeldafanful mission accomplished.

  • @Superzeldafanful well you got him. didnt take you as long as it took us. good job. (but seriously rip to all those that died)

  • @Superzeldafanful good news the fucker is dead

  • @Superzeldafanful Team 6 beat yu to it

  • @Superzeldafanful I think you accomplished your mission , sir .. lol

  • @Superzeldafanful too late we got i'm

  • @Superzeldafanful We got 'em, dude!

  • @Superzeldafanful thank you dude. we appreciate it. And we got that bastard.

  • @Superzeldafanful dont worry we got our revenge hes sitting at the bottom of the ocean

  • Have you heard what people say? "I pray for them". Ah, so helpful. Guys, don't worry, it's alright, this guy just telepathically asked his imaginary friend in the sky for help, there's nothing to worry about. So helpful.

  • seriously someone give me a reason why i am watching this

  • @giants666666 Cause you clicked on the video