So lets understand this, to pick a color you must have a cell the contains the color first and then choose that cell in the wizard. Sure, makes sense to me. Wouldn't a standard color picker have been a bit easier on the user?
For a single use (or for experts who know color by their HEX or RGB names), a standard color picker would have been enough.
But we want our users to take advantage of a 100% dynamic data-driven visualization, including "conditional formatting" function. With our way to do things, you can have the same color on your graphics as in your table.
Comment: if you can convince us of your choice, of course we could add the function that you propose.
So lets understand this, to pick a color you must have a cell the contains the color first and then choose that cell in the wizard. Sure, makes sense to me. Wouldn't a standard color picker have been a bit easier on the user?
ryork272 1 year ago
@ryork272
For a single use (or for experts who know color by their HEX or RGB names), a standard color picker would have been enough.
But we want our users to take advantage of a 100% dynamic data-driven visualization, including "conditional formatting" function. With our way to do things, you can have the same color on your graphics as in your table.
Comment: if you can convince us of your choice, of course we could add the function that you propose.
Regards,
BeGraphic's team
Aldecis 1 year ago