Just goes to show the power of the dirty jews in todays world. You can talk about whatever you like,just don't talk about the pathetic POS's that are jews. It's really too bad there wasn't a holocaust.It's too bad Germany didn't kill every last one of them.They are a curse to any land they settle in.
So far we do not have ANY single shred of eveidence supporting the official holo-version.We do have,however, the holo-version shrinking:)Less "death camps","less gas chambers" "less gas chambers victims".
We have something in the "more" part as well: more people jailed for non -beliving the holo bulshit.
The point he is raising is why can't the official narrative of the Holocaust be questione and investigated like every other historical event?
The answer? Because Holocaust Acceptance is a religion, not a scholarly conclusion, and to question it is sacrelige -- and we all know what has happened historically to blasphemers
It's not like he's saying the holocau$t never happened per say, he's just saying the his-story supporting it doesn't stand up to basic scientific analysis and thus should be further investigated like any other alledged crime scene. But should we cover the truth, just because the "victims" are so 'sensitive'? Let's face it, as soon as someone criticises Israels actions for example, they pull the 'victim' card.
Bradley- please look on CODOH forum under the thread-" Bradley you won't believe what is on the end of this line" - you have a former opinion editor of Badger Herald who will DEBATE you. Yes!!!! This is not a dream. LOL.
Today ,being 56 years old I DO NOT HAVE ANY DOUBTS THAT THE OFFICIAL VERSION IS A HUGE LIE.
I do not have any doubts that the holocaust myth is a tool used against us to implement a guilt feeling in all of us for one and one purpose only: to kill our dignity,to kill our self-preservation instinct and teach us that for our own survival is better to accept the official version.
Like you I grew up behind the curtain. Dann koennen wir uns ja auch auf Deutsch unterhalten? Was genau meinst du mit Selbsterhaltungsinstinkt? Wer will den denn demontieren? Wie soll das denn auch nur im geringsten Sinn machen??
Photographic evidence of what, teeth....does that prove there was a systematic extermination of jews? Look at my channel background pic, that pic circulated by Yad Vashem was forged. War crimes is a phrase made up by the victors. Dresden, Hamburg, Hiroshima etc were war crimes but the US, bloodiest of all armies never has any explaining to do before the international community. The carpet bombing and defoliants that killed 3 million Vietnamese, Laotians, and Cambodians were war crimes.
Photographs of 65 lb bodies only prove one thing, people died from diseases. In the business of war-time propaganda the most effective is the use of photographs of the most pitiful and revolting. The majority of corpses which are shown to us in photos are clearly the corpses of typhus victims. Photos of clothes does not prove there was a holocaust, only that prisoners were issued inmates uniforms.
Fair enough. I postulate that the carpet bombing you speak of never happened. What was bombed were rice fields and jungle paddies that were previously meticulously cleared of people. The bombing recorded on film was in fact an agricultural land-clearing project. The moonlanding was fake to gain a pop. opinion advantage over Russia, and Kennedy had to be removed from office to allow CIA projects to move ahead.
How is the above argument any different than yours? And, how is this not the type of argument anybody can make at any time, choosing top disbelieving anything?
check out this site for tons of photos - which of course you will brand as slander and misconstrued evidence. But at least this way, we can talk about the same (fake/authentic) evidence, have a similar starting point. from which to argue.
Pious minds lends true to extraordinary nonsense. Rice fields meticulously cleared of people....agricultural land clearing project..?? If your theories should get any more preposterous you better call your insane asylum about their exchange programme. Then again, it is possible that your demented opinions are years of suppressed dementia which has just now succeeded in passing from your unconscious to your conscious mind.
Right - I was trying to show (and seem to have done a fairly good job of doing so, IMHO) that an opinion based on doubt alone is in fact always entirely ludicrous. My "agricultural land-clearing" argument = your "Holocaust is a hoax argument," sir.
With these words, I'll respectfully bow out of this discussion. Thank you all for engaging in a (sufficiently) respectful discourse, but for me, this has been about as fruitful as it ever will.
There is no physical or forensic evidence to support any kind of credible, technical theory as to how the supposed gassings were actually carried out. All the holocaust gassing claims are so technically absurd that it should be obvious to people with some technical comprehension that the gassing claims are, in fact, nothing more than elaborate lies. There is no autopsy report stating 'this is a body of a person killed by HCN poison or CO.
The issue is not Kennedy or the moonlanding. You argue as if you have the IQ and the attention span of a first trimester zygote. Can you provide some evidence that a single person died in a homicidal gas chamber or from CO poisoning made from diesel exhaust? There is no valid theory as to how the alleged homicidal, mass gassings could have happened. All of the alleged gassing methods are so technically absurd that they cannot withstand any serious scientific investigation.
@samsa19791 . How can the documentation obsessive Nazis march millions of people into gas chambers and not leave behind a single photo, a single second of film -- that is how the question should be posed
My name I Jerzy Ulicki-Rek.I do speak and write 4 languages :Polish,German,Russian and English.This gives me an access to materials published in those 4 lingua.
Born in Poland under so called "communism ' occupation I was exposed ,from the early childhood to the history of so called"Holocaust".
And, to qualify my point a bit: what proof could POSSIBLY be had, in your opinion? If witnesses are all dead, if a majority of records has been destroyed and the remaining are considered fake - how is it that proof could EVER be had? This is what makes the question such a dangerous one, and, sadly, one that's been labeled a taboo.
As an ardent student of history and a armchair researcher of the Third Reich what proof do you have that a holocaust happened? Can you prove there was a policy of exterminating jews, that Hitler got his hands on 6 million jews that a single person died from HCN or CO poisoning?
Since the Germans were fsairly efficient about destroying evidence in the final months, being astutely aware of having committed warcrimes, much evidence (especially photographic) came from embedded journalists. (I.e. the stockpiles of teeth, clothing, 65-lb. bodies etc.). What do you suppose these pictures are? Are they staged? What the moonlanding staged, then, too? Kennedy shooting?go
Also, exactly what could be got, other than some nebulous neboulous guilt, by going thru all this trouble?
Just to keep things in perspective: The Endloesung was NOT proposed to kill Jews - they were only a (small part!) of the groups of people targeted by the Nazis for extinction. This group included communists, general political opponents, gays, Russian captives from the war, intellectuals, Roma-Sinti and a whole host of others. Hence, this is not a question of a Jewish Holocaust at all - it is a question of "Did the Final Solution" occur. Just to be sure we are asking the correct question.
@ conchez - YES to the imperative of open debate. It is only because asking these questions runs into the hands of and is asked mainly by intellectually short-changed White Brothers that the question has been pushed into taboo.
Fair enough. How, then, can you prove anything? say the moon landing, that the first world war occurred, that the Spanish Flu killed upwards of 10 million people in 1916/17, and so on?
It is very easy to ask questions.
On a similar note, my great-great-grandfather was killed by the Nazis while in exile in the Czech Republic. How do I know THIS happened? Can I trust my grandfather? Can I trust anyone? Sometimes, questions are used to obstruct, not to find truth, which is my worry here.
excellent once again Bradley. I am an academic and researched in a UK university and there is a complete whitewash whenever it comes to even the thought of questioning the events of the Jewish holocaust. The more I dig the more evident it is that the Jewish holocaust is a cash cow for Israel and zionism. It is NOT anti-semitic or neo-nazi to suggest this - why can't there be an open debate without the rhetoric of anti-semitism arising? Because this is a TABOO topic.
Let me venture to interpret what you do. By not having to pose these questions (presumably, "Did it really happen? Is there a vast conspiracy out there that covers up the real facts?" etc.), what you do is cloak your presumptions (presumptions at best!) in the mantle of intellectual inquiry. Neo-Nazi's have been doing this for decades in my homeland. So, if you take issue with this charge, than ASK THE QUESTION. Who knows, maybe you have something cognizant to add to the historical record!
So, dear Bradley, as a 30-year old East German, an ardent student of history and a fond armchair researcher of the Third Reich, its social background, the Second World War, I ask you this: What is the question you have about the Holocaust? If you feel that it should be so easy and self-evident to ask these "questions," then why don't you do it?
Just goes to show the power of the dirty jews in todays world. You can talk about whatever you like,just don't talk about the pathetic POS's that are jews. It's really too bad there wasn't a holocaust.It's too bad Germany didn't kill every last one of them.They are a curse to any land they settle in.
donsaiditwoud 3 months ago
Define "proof" in the context of the question.
Then explain why the only thing you wish to question the academics on, seems to be their agreed consensus on the Holocaust?
timpovikings 11 months ago
To the gutless Chancellor and the rest of those close-minded and hysterical holocaust "believers," I leave you with this:
"Condemnation before investigation is the highest form of ignorance."
and
"Truth has NOTHING to fear from investigation."
440John 1 year ago
Keep up the fine work, Bradley! The holocaust MYTH has to be crushed!
440John 1 year ago
So far we do not have ANY single shred of eveidence supporting the official holo-version.We do have,however, the holo-version shrinking:)Less "death camps","less gas chambers" "less gas chambers victims".
We have something in the "more" part as well: more people jailed for non -beliving the holo bulshit.
Jerzy Ulicki-Rek
Bieszczady73 1 year ago 2
Chancellor Martin acting like a kid ! A immature, emotional and irresponsible infantile !
That is what we are left with to "teach" our kids !
Reminds us of Salem ! The monkey trial ! The inquisition !
This is the Holocaust religion. Made up from Soviet and allies post-war propaganda. Making our kids self hating skidzoïd freaks. Controlable.
Wake up america !
acabramzach 1 year ago
It's not just about the Holohoax; it's about freedom of speech, freedom of research, and freedom of expression!
Sockpuppet2012 2 years ago
The point he is raising is why can't the official narrative of the Holocaust be questione and investigated like every other historical event?
The answer? Because Holocaust Acceptance is a religion, not a scholarly conclusion, and to question it is sacrelige -- and we all know what has happened historically to blasphemers
oldjoe5 2 years ago
It's not like he's saying the holocau$t never happened per say, he's just saying the his-story supporting it doesn't stand up to basic scientific analysis and thus should be further investigated like any other alledged crime scene. But should we cover the truth, just because the "victims" are so 'sensitive'? Let's face it, as soon as someone criticises Israels actions for example, they pull the 'victim' card.
roughcutone2 2 years ago
Bradley- please look on CODOH forum under the thread-" Bradley you won't believe what is on the end of this line" - you have a former opinion editor of Badger Herald who will DEBATE you. Yes!!!! This is not a dream. LOL.
holocaustexpert 2 years ago
Today ,being 56 years old I DO NOT HAVE ANY DOUBTS THAT THE OFFICIAL VERSION IS A HUGE LIE.
I do not have any doubts that the holocaust myth is a tool used against us to implement a guilt feeling in all of us for one and one purpose only: to kill our dignity,to kill our self-preservation instinct and teach us that for our own survival is better to accept the official version.
Bieszczady73 2 years ago
Like you I grew up behind the curtain. Dann koennen wir uns ja auch auf Deutsch unterhalten? Was genau meinst du mit Selbsterhaltungsinstinkt? Wer will den denn demontieren? Wie soll das denn auch nur im geringsten Sinn machen??
samsa19791 2 years ago
@samsa
Photographic evidence of what, teeth....does that prove there was a systematic extermination of jews? Look at my channel background pic, that pic circulated by Yad Vashem was forged. War crimes is a phrase made up by the victors. Dresden, Hamburg, Hiroshima etc were war crimes but the US, bloodiest of all armies never has any explaining to do before the international community. The carpet bombing and defoliants that killed 3 million Vietnamese, Laotians, and Cambodians were war crimes.
realrasmckhaile 2 years ago 2
@samsa19791
Photographs of 65 lb bodies only prove one thing, people died from diseases. In the business of war-time propaganda the most effective is the use of photographs of the most pitiful and revolting. The majority of corpses which are shown to us in photos are clearly the corpses of typhus victims. Photos of clothes does not prove there was a holocaust, only that prisoners were issued inmates uniforms.
realrasmckhaile 2 years ago 2
So, short of a picture of somebody being marched into a gas chamber alive, you would not believe that the Holocaust existed, right?
samsa19791 2 years ago
Fair enough. I postulate that the carpet bombing you speak of never happened. What was bombed were rice fields and jungle paddies that were previously meticulously cleared of people. The bombing recorded on film was in fact an agricultural land-clearing project. The moonlanding was fake to gain a pop. opinion advantage over Russia, and Kennedy had to be removed from office to allow CIA projects to move ahead.
samsa19791 2 years ago
How is the above argument any different than yours? And, how is this not the type of argument anybody can make at any time, choosing top disbelieving anything?
check out this site for tons of photos - which of course you will brand as slander and misconstrued evidence. But at least this way, we can talk about the same (fake/authentic) evidence, have a similar starting point. from which to argue.
samsa19791 2 years ago
@samsa19791
Pious minds lends true to extraordinary nonsense. Rice fields meticulously cleared of people....agricultural land clearing project..?? If your theories should get any more preposterous you better call your insane asylum about their exchange programme. Then again, it is possible that your demented opinions are years of suppressed dementia which has just now succeeded in passing from your unconscious to your conscious mind.
realrasmckhaile 2 years ago
Right - I was trying to show (and seem to have done a fairly good job of doing so, IMHO) that an opinion based on doubt alone is in fact always entirely ludicrous. My "agricultural land-clearing" argument = your "Holocaust is a hoax argument," sir.
With these words, I'll respectfully bow out of this discussion. Thank you all for engaging in a (sufficiently) respectful discourse, but for me, this has been about as fruitful as it ever will.
samsa19791 2 years ago
@samsa19791
There is no physical or forensic evidence to support any kind of credible, technical theory as to how the supposed gassings were actually carried out. All the holocaust gassing claims are so technically absurd that it should be obvious to people with some technical comprehension that the gassing claims are, in fact, nothing more than elaborate lies. There is no autopsy report stating 'this is a body of a person killed by HCN poison or CO.
realrasmckhaile 2 years ago
@samsa
The issue is not Kennedy or the moonlanding. You argue as if you have the IQ and the attention span of a first trimester zygote. Can you provide some evidence that a single person died in a homicidal gas chamber or from CO poisoning made from diesel exhaust? There is no valid theory as to how the alleged homicidal, mass gassings could have happened. All of the alleged gassing methods are so technically absurd that they cannot withstand any serious scientific investigation.
realrasmckhaile 2 years ago
@samsa19791: When you support the claim that 6 million people were systematically murdered, the onus is on you to provide indisputable proof.
oldjoe5 2 years ago
@samsa19791 . How can the documentation obsessive Nazis march millions of people into gas chambers and not leave behind a single photo, a single second of film -- that is how the question should be posed
oldjoe5 2 years ago
Samasa
For some reason some of my commnets are not visible.
Let's have a look what will happen with this one.
Jerzy
Bieszczady73 2 years ago
When I was about 30 years old and outside the country and reading THE SAME holo-correct books I spotted how shallow they are.
I follow my doubts.
Today ,being 56 years old I DO NOT HAVE ANY DOUBTS THAT THE OFFICIAL VERSION IS A HUGE LIE.
Bieszczady73 2 years ago
My name I Jerzy Ulicki-Rek.I do speak and write 4 languages :Polish,German,Russian and English.This gives me an access to materials published in those 4 lingua.
Born in Poland under so called "communism ' occupation I was exposed ,from the early childhood to the history of so called"Holocaust".
Bieszczady73 2 years ago
And, to qualify my point a bit: what proof could POSSIBLY be had, in your opinion? If witnesses are all dead, if a majority of records has been destroyed and the remaining are considered fake - how is it that proof could EVER be had? This is what makes the question such a dangerous one, and, sadly, one that's been labeled a taboo.
samsa19791 2 years ago
@samsa19791
As an ardent student of history and a armchair researcher of the Third Reich what proof do you have that a holocaust happened? Can you prove there was a policy of exterminating jews, that Hitler got his hands on 6 million jews that a single person died from HCN or CO poisoning?
realrasmckhaile 2 years ago
Since the Germans were fsairly efficient about destroying evidence in the final months, being astutely aware of having committed warcrimes, much evidence (especially photographic) came from embedded journalists. (I.e. the stockpiles of teeth, clothing, 65-lb. bodies etc.). What do you suppose these pictures are? Are they staged? What the moonlanding staged, then, too? Kennedy shooting?go
Also, exactly what could be got, other than some nebulous neboulous guilt, by going thru all this trouble?
samsa19791 2 years ago
Just to keep things in perspective: The Endloesung was NOT proposed to kill Jews - they were only a (small part!) of the groups of people targeted by the Nazis for extinction. This group included communists, general political opponents, gays, Russian captives from the war, intellectuals, Roma-Sinti and a whole host of others. Hence, this is not a question of a Jewish Holocaust at all - it is a question of "Did the Final Solution" occur. Just to be sure we are asking the correct question.
samsa19791 2 years ago
Comment removed
samsa19791 2 years ago
@ conchez - YES to the imperative of open debate. It is only because asking these questions runs into the hands of and is asked mainly by intellectually short-changed White Brothers that the question has been pushed into taboo.
samsa19791 2 years ago
Fair enough. How, then, can you prove anything? say the moon landing, that the first world war occurred, that the Spanish Flu killed upwards of 10 million people in 1916/17, and so on?
It is very easy to ask questions.
On a similar note, my great-great-grandfather was killed by the Nazis while in exile in the Czech Republic. How do I know THIS happened? Can I trust my grandfather? Can I trust anyone? Sometimes, questions are used to obstruct, not to find truth, which is my worry here.
samsa19791 2 years ago
Comment removed
samsa19791 2 years ago
excellent once again Bradley. I am an academic and researched in a UK university and there is a complete whitewash whenever it comes to even the thought of questioning the events of the Jewish holocaust. The more I dig the more evident it is that the Jewish holocaust is a cash cow for Israel and zionism. It is NOT anti-semitic or neo-nazi to suggest this - why can't there be an open debate without the rhetoric of anti-semitism arising? Because this is a TABOO topic.
conchez 2 years ago 2
Great job Bradley. You are bringing this important topic out in the open.
holocaustexpert 2 years ago 2
Let me venture to interpret what you do. By not having to pose these questions (presumably, "Did it really happen? Is there a vast conspiracy out there that covers up the real facts?" etc.), what you do is cloak your presumptions (presumptions at best!) in the mantle of intellectual inquiry. Neo-Nazi's have been doing this for decades in my homeland. So, if you take issue with this charge, than ASK THE QUESTION. Who knows, maybe you have something cognizant to add to the historical record!
samsa19791 2 years ago
So, dear Bradley, as a 30-year old East German, an ardent student of history and a fond armchair researcher of the Third Reich, its social background, the Second World War, I ask you this: What is the question you have about the Holocaust? If you feel that it should be so easy and self-evident to ask these "questions," then why don't you do it?
samsa19791 2 years ago
@samsa19791
There are a great many questions to be asked. One that I have asked of several thousand academics at major universities around the nation is this one:
"Can you provide, with proof, the name of one person killed in a gas chamber at Auschwitz?"
Please focus on the word "proof."
--Bradley
sonicolabs 2 years ago 4