@horror Whether you live in NYC or not, too many of us knew people who saw the planes; you can pull the legs of people who are going along with the gag, or with folks who feel if you simply say something didn't happen, it didn't....how the second plane came down the Hudson so long after is a mystery that demands all possibilities explored.....I'm thinking if a plane crashes into the WTC, and I'm with security organizations, I'm thinking it's important to check for anything else coming in
@0xTRX007 well this is not that easy to explain.on the surface it looks like they were all amateurs who took vids and pics by pure luck but when you start digging you realise that things doesnt are just like what u thought.
most of the socalled amateurs are no "amateurs" they were all in one way or the other connected to media and filmmaking.
most known "amateurshots" are anonymous and uncredited,they apeared right after the fact in internet.
yes.. this video shows that they were flying planes by remote control as early as 1944... and with all the tech. we have today with gps etc. no problems to fly them into towers #1,2, 7... oh yeah.. .NOTHING HIT #7 yet it still fell at freefall speed... WAKE UP AMERICA...
Anyone who still thinks 9/11 was NOT a False-flag mission hasn't done enough research. Get ready America. Another False-flag attack coming to your country this year. If Aaron McCollum is right it will be in 2-3 months. Having to do with the Gulf of Aden and the US's need to control Yemen.
@Pyromaniac1801 Wasn't my prediction..like I said... If Aaron McCollum is right. Doesn't change my mind on 9/11. I'll concede when anyone can explain #1- How did the WTC building 7 fall? It wasn't hit by anything. Then when you look at what was in it. #2- All those Exxon Valdes documents and just where did the Est. 6 Billion in gold bullion disappear to? #3- How convenient the guy who bought all that property took out insurance for just such an event a few months prior. None of this hit the news
Building 7 was hit with burning debris from the wtc 1 & 2. If they supposedly fell into their own footprint how does buildings 2,3,4,5 and 6 sustain so much damage they have to be demolished.
There is a lot of suspicious things about 9/11. This video confirms for me that the technology in 2001 to remote fly that plane would have advanced enough to do 9/11 by RC.
The pentagon pilot could not have pulled off those maneuvers and stayed in his seat in a passenger airplane.
@horror Whether you live in NYC or not, too many of us knew people who saw the planes; you can pull the legs of people who are going along with the gag, or with folks who feel if you simply say something didn't happen, it didn't....how the second plane came down the Hudson so long after is a mystery that demands all possibilities explored.....I'm thinking if a plane crashes into the WTC, and I'm with security organizations, I'm thinking it's important to check for anything else coming in
Barrynisman 8 months ago
I wonder if this was a ploy to get Kennedy to kill himself.
WhiteCordlessKnight 1 year ago
Yep if they could do this in 1940 why couldnt they do it in 2001? 60 years of technology.
GeoDubya1 1 year ago
@GeoDubya1
all of this remote plane thing is disinfo to make ppl believe real planes flew into the towers.
there was no planes, all footage is clearly fake.
ppl right at wtcs did not saw a plane or even hear a plane, it was missiles hitting the towers.
it is a setup ppl.
no remote planes, no hologramms, plain simple big missiles and a few amateurish prepared planevids.
most ppl dont even know that there was only 5 live shots aired live as it happeed none of the first hit.
horror11 1 year ago
Comment removed
0xTRX007 1 year ago
@0xTRX007 well this is not that easy to explain.on the surface it looks like they were all amateurs who took vids and pics by pure luck but when you start digging you realise that things doesnt are just like what u thought.
most of the socalled amateurs are no "amateurs" they were all in one way or the other connected to media and filmmaking.
most known "amateurshots" are anonymous and uncredited,they apeared right after the fact in internet.
the rabbit hole is deeper than u might think:)
horror11 1 year ago
The Kennedy's were fearless (except for Ted) that's probably why JFK was asassinated. Can't say that about B.O. he will live to a ripe old age.
afferch 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
yes.. this video shows that they were flying planes by remote control as early as 1944... and with all the tech. we have today with gps etc. no problems to fly them into towers #1,2, 7... oh yeah.. .NOTHING HIT #7 yet it still fell at freefall speed... WAKE UP AMERICA...
terrymccully 2 years ago
Comment removed
terrymccully 2 years ago
RobinDropping mutha fuckha you are correct!
Madskillz82 2 years ago
911 was an inside job motherfuckers HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
RobinDropping 2 years ago 4
Operation Aphrodite has been brought back from the mothballs.
The pretext for the clampdown on government protesters and the institution of martial law has begun in Austin Texas.
Look for more Joe Stacks.
glipzik 2 years ago
Anyone who still thinks 9/11 was NOT a False-flag mission hasn't done enough research. Get ready America. Another False-flag attack coming to your country this year. If Aaron McCollum is right it will be in 2-3 months. Having to do with the Gulf of Aden and the US's need to control Yemen.
tiger8me 2 years ago
@tiger8me well we see how that went through. Good Call!!
Pyromaniac1801 1 year ago
@Pyromaniac1801 Wasn't my prediction..like I said... If Aaron McCollum is right. Doesn't change my mind on 9/11. I'll concede when anyone can explain #1- How did the WTC building 7 fall? It wasn't hit by anything. Then when you look at what was in it. #2- All those Exxon Valdes documents and just where did the Est. 6 Billion in gold bullion disappear to? #3- How convenient the guy who bought all that property took out insurance for just such an event a few months prior. None of this hit the news
tiger8me 1 year ago
@tiger8me
Building 7 was hit with burning debris from the wtc 1 & 2. If they supposedly fell into their own footprint how does buildings 2,3,4,5 and 6 sustain so much damage they have to be demolished.
There is a lot of suspicious things about 9/11. This video confirms for me that the technology in 2001 to remote fly that plane would have advanced enough to do 9/11 by RC.
The pentagon pilot could not have pulled off those maneuvers and stayed in his seat in a passenger airplane.
8Thirst 1 year ago
From 1944 to 2001, just think how far this technology must have come.
theylive23 2 years ago 3
9/11 inside job!
doomsday plane
Prohumani 2 years ago 4
...and defenders of the official "story" of 911 think you couldn't fly remote control planes into buildings - LOL!
The official "story" of 911 is - dead!
911 Was "Another" Inside Job!
SuspiciousPatriot 2 years ago 15
@SuspiciousPatriot *sigh*
jratzinger07 2 years ago
It would be nice to know what episode and what year this is from on the History Channel. For journalism purposes.
0ranutan 2 years ago
The clip is from the History Channel program 'WEIRD WEAPONS' episode title 'THE ALLIES'. The DVD was released in 2005.
THEPARADIGMSHlFT 2 years ago 3
Thanks Paradigm.
0ranutan 2 years ago 2
Excellent Clip. Thanks.
0ranutan 2 years ago 7