Go easy on the guy. 70 was the last year for the Shelby Mustang. The 69 and 70 are easy to recognize because of the unique hood scoops. They weren't the best of the breed by far. I think the 67 and 68's were the best.
The 70 Shelby GT500 also utilized the chin spoiler taken from the Boss 302 on top of having the twin black strikes on the hood.... The car in this video is a 69. Technically speaking the 1970 Shelby are ALSO 1969 Shelbys.. they were simply re-tagged as 1970s so they could sell them.
yeah it is sweet looking especially with the standard 5 count rear leaf springs and a drag-pak. my favorite stang and only stang i like is 69 mach1 nd 70 mach1. i dont like the other mustangs. too ugly.
Dude, that's a '69. The only distinguishable difference between a '69 and '70 Shelby mustang is that the '70s had the double black stripe on the hood, no matter what color paint scheme it had.
Um, yeah it is. The '69s look almost like the '70s. The one difference that helps you tell them apart is that EVERY 1970 Shelby Mustang (regardless of what color it was) had two thick black stripes on the hood.
@Sarcasticscum 70 1970 gt500s were just 69s with a painted hood thats all. they didnt sell well cause of the 351 390 and 428 mach1s were more popular and affordable.
I know... Shelby re-badged the '69 bodies, and used them for the '70 model-year.. Coolest looking Shelby Mustangs of all-time.. By far, the prettiest mustang built.
Why spend 200K on a car and not use it? Oh I would use it, everyday. I don't want it sitting around like nothing, I want people to notice it and admire it, it needs to be seen, 69 Shelby GT 500.
This is a 1969-1970 GT500 a no it is not the Mach 1.Yes the two models are very similar but you can spot a 69 GT500 because it has a stock white stripe a long the side of the car with the "GT500" written at the beginning right next to the headlights and the mach one never had chrome around or any where near his front bumper not the First generation not the 72 mach one or 73 mach one.The only thing that is similar to the mach one is the hood...
your a fucking idiot, that is a 69 shelby gt500. look on the side at the very front it clealy says gt500 there. and look at the tail lights, there shelby lights you fuck tard. you should drive some railroad spikes through your knee caps then bend your legs all the way back.
@ryryt12 thats a 69 ,67 was the best 67`s were tagged as build by Carrol Shelby and nowhere on the title was fords name, in 69 ford was on the title. which drops the value drastically compared to a 67
lol. power brake or line lock burnout? lol. it takes real horsepower not 2 use the brakes. see how long of black mark u can leave on the street with out the brakes. take care. (:>)
cars are made for the purpose of driving. if you want a museum piece to treasure and hide away from the world, go buy a picasso painting or something. this is american muscle. its PURPOSE is to burnout.
Personally, I'd drive a car like this, but I'm also not part of that trendy anti-trailer backlash so prevalent in enthusiast circles today. I do think at least some of these cars should be preserved in undriven condition.
there are enough cars put away in museums. i can guarantee you that for every GT500 you'll ever see driven on the road there are probably 6 sitting in a museum or under a cover in a heated garage to never see the light of day.
no such thing as a 73 mach 1 boss 302, the boss 302 was done in 69 and 70 and the mach 1 was a totally different car. that guy made no sense, just an ass out of himself for lack of knowledge. If the car was a true shelby , youd have to be a fool to abuse it that way, and the louvers scream fake snake.
Sorry... I didn't mean to insult anyone. At first glance (Never before seeing a 69 GT500) I assumed it was a 1973, and that the author got the years wrong. After a quick Google search I quickly learned I had mistaken. However that doesn't give you a right to call me a "fucking moron" All I can say to that is that your Immature and need to learn to respect others even though they committed a dumb mistake.
73's really arent that big,they just look like it. I have a 69 fastback and a 73 coupe. and when you pull them up even with each other the 73 is only a couple of inches longer. And about the same width.
Nice Shelby! I love those cars! One of the Best Looking Cars ever made! Try taking a video doing a real burn-out, Don't use the brakes! It will be more realistic and show the true power! And by the way, you are not going to hurt it by doing burn-outs! Carroll Shelby designed these cars for much harder use than doing burn-outs! Have Fun!!
Brakes -- my thoughts exactly. If ya ain't got enough power to smoke 'em on a roll-on then don't video. Hell my mom's Honda 4 cyl can do a burnout on the brakes. :)
if you spend that much on a car you better do something with it instead of letting it sit in a garage for the rest of its life. like these bitch ass collectors do.
Go easy on the guy. 70 was the last year for the Shelby Mustang. The 69 and 70 are easy to recognize because of the unique hood scoops. They weren't the best of the breed by far. I think the 67 and 68's were the best.
RHO1953 2 months ago
The 70 Shelby GT500 also utilized the chin spoiler taken from the Boss 302 on top of having the twin black strikes on the hood.... The car in this video is a 69. Technically speaking the 1970 Shelby are ALSO 1969 Shelbys.. they were simply re-tagged as 1970s so they could sell them.
Illivatur 5 months ago
1969?
cdfandafi 6 months ago
That was awesome! :)
WikederEndia 8 months ago
Comment removed
EscapeTheBass 8 months ago
I'd smoke that in my stock Acura TL.
shatchett0 8 months ago
@shatchett0 that made me laugh, you should be a comedian!
MrTransAm1979 8 months ago
@shatchett0 doubtful
Protains 7 months ago
@shatchett0 LOL you are joking, right? If not, you are one dumb son of a bitch!
106MMTurbo 7 months ago
@shatchett0 Sorry to say ur tl wouldnt stand a chance.
429ci 6 months ago
@shatchett0 You are fucking dumb.
ScruffStep 5 months ago
yeah it is sweet looking especially with the standard 5 count rear leaf springs and a drag-pak. my favorite stang and only stang i like is 69 mach1 nd 70 mach1. i dont like the other mustangs. too ugly.
1962Galaxie514ciMPFI 10 months ago
This is one my favorite mustang! My second would be a 1970 Boss
Iesous238 11 months ago
@Iesous238 yeah i cant argue about that
paintwaster117 11 months ago
lovin it-the shelby 69 mustang was abit before it's time........
the boss429 looks so much better but if u wanted the the latest in 69 u went for the shelby
techracer100 11 months ago
Holy Shit! That is most truly badassed mustang.
Peekadam 1 year ago
right on!
krasblak 1 year ago
Dude thats a '70
skyner3299 1 year ago
@skyner3299
Dude, that's a '69. The only distinguishable difference between a '69 and '70 Shelby mustang is that the '70s had the double black stripe on the hood, no matter what color paint scheme it had.
Sarcasticscum 1 year ago
@Sarcasticscum dude, thats no 69
italianstallion228 11 months ago
@italianstallion228
Um, yeah it is. The '69s look almost like the '70s. The one difference that helps you tell them apart is that EVERY 1970 Shelby Mustang (regardless of what color it was) had two thick black stripes on the hood.
Sarcasticscum 11 months ago
@Sarcasticscum 70 1970 gt500s were just 69s with a painted hood thats all. they didnt sell well cause of the 351 390 and 428 mach1s were more popular and affordable.
1962Galaxie514ciMPFI 10 months ago
@1962Galaxie514ciMPFI
I know... Shelby re-badged the '69 bodies, and used them for the '70 model-year.. Coolest looking Shelby Mustangs of all-time.. By far, the prettiest mustang built.
Sarcasticscum 10 months ago
I USED TO CLEAN THOSE 428'S CLOCK WITH MY 69 GTO JUDGE BUT, THEY ARE COOL LOOKING ALL, 60'70'S CARS WERE KICKASS.
FASTLIGHTNING1 1 year ago
Why spend 200K on a car and not use it? Oh I would use it, everyday. I don't want it sitting around like nothing, I want people to notice it and admire it, it needs to be seen, 69 Shelby GT 500.
chaserr120 1 year ago
I love that grille! I reminds me of a perfect blend of torino and mustang
2strokedetroit 1 year ago
kinda reminds me of a plymouth roadrunner
metalmaster014 1 year ago
Id say the coolest looking hood ever.
mercmarc 1 year ago
i think the front looks like a 1970 challenger.
woodulikemustard 1 year ago
@woodulikemustard Yeah your right .
mercmarc 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ewwwwwww its ugly 64-68 shelbys are the best they are the true mustangs
Brendawgggggggg 1 year ago
of all the weird lookin' mustangs this is the one i like the best
fvboss429 1 year ago
@fvboss429 wierd lookin, you mean fucking gnarly looking. :)
SnowboardinHippie 1 year ago
Look's too much like the early 70's M:s
The 69 Mustang look is the best.
And I know it's a Gt 500. :-)
derpalle 1 year ago
the 69 mach 1, Boss 302 and 429 realy have a better looking front
OGRM 2 years ago
my 69 500 titled `Shelby', always has been. Bought in 69 after draft RVN. Check your title Rocky.
alpo 2 years ago
This is a 1969-1970 GT500 a no it is not the Mach 1.Yes the two models are very similar but you can spot a 69 GT500 because it has a stock white stripe a long the side of the car with the "GT500" written at the beginning right next to the headlights and the mach one never had chrome around or any where near his front bumper not the First generation not the 72 mach one or 73 mach one.The only thing that is similar to the mach one is the hood...
Strbo01 2 years ago
i like the 69's more than any of the other gt500's. nice car you got there man.
AJahtp 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
u all are retarded fuck sticks thats not a 69 its a 70's mach 1. u should jump off a bridge and kill urself dumbass's
bulldog7669 2 years ago
You are retarded that is a 1969 Shelby GT 500.
SuperAnthonyM 2 years ago
your a fucking idiot, that is a 69 shelby gt500. look on the side at the very front it clealy says gt500 there. and look at the tail lights, there shelby lights you fuck tard. you should drive some railroad spikes through your knee caps then bend your legs all the way back.
AJahtp 2 years ago
The 70s fastbacks were based off of this car and the milano mustang concept. You "retarded fuck stick"
robotmonkey73 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ugly 67 68 the best
ryryt12 2 years ago
@ryryt12 thats a 69 ,67 was the best 67`s were tagged as build by Carrol Shelby and nowhere on the title was fords name, in 69 ford was on the title. which drops the value drastically compared to a 67
ROCKO633 2 years ago
uhhh, i do not like the 69 shelby looks, the performance was great though
Xsis720 2 years ago
this is my favorite shelby mustang
MultiKippy 2 years ago
Looks more like a mustang boss
shadowfoxdesfox 2 years ago
I fuckin' love this car man.
WhistlerRider20 2 years ago
or a mach 1
slopokes93 2 years ago
The 1969-1970 Mustang GT500 Front End reminds me of a 1970 Dodge Challenger's front end.
General1lol 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
lol. power brake or line lock burnout? lol. it takes real horsepower not 2 use the brakes. see how long of black mark u can leave on the street with out the brakes. take care. (:>)
CAMARO30082 2 years ago
this was when the mustangs started getting ugly. i believe it was 64 up until 70 that they didnt have this ugly front end.
DylanR2008 2 years ago
this is a 69
wheeler8801 2 years ago
ya i was referring to the mustang line not the shelby mustang line so i guess the last year for the pretty shelby was 68
DylanR2008 2 years ago
Who the hell treats a beautiful car such as this one that way... asshole
Mysteryskatrl 2 years ago
maybe some people like to actually drive the shit they own
austin7777100 2 years ago 28
cars are made for the purpose of driving. if you want a museum piece to treasure and hide away from the world, go buy a picasso painting or something. this is american muscle. its PURPOSE is to burnout.
JIMMYJIBLETS 2 years ago
Technically, cars are also made to be disposable.
Personally, I'd drive a car like this, but I'm also not part of that trendy anti-trailer backlash so prevalent in enthusiast circles today. I do think at least some of these cars should be preserved in undriven condition.
RadialSkid 2 years ago
there are enough cars put away in museums. i can guarantee you that for every GT500 you'll ever see driven on the road there are probably 6 sitting in a museum or under a cover in a heated garage to never see the light of day.
JIMMYJIBLETS 2 years ago
try 600
scwhockey41 2 years ago
no such thing as a 73 mach 1 boss 302, the boss 302 was done in 69 and 70 and the mach 1 was a totally different car. that guy made no sense, just an ass out of himself for lack of knowledge. If the car was a true shelby , youd have to be a fool to abuse it that way, and the louvers scream fake snake.
HwyPony 3 years ago
thats deff. a 69 shelby
dodgechargerdaytona 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
not a GT500 it looks like a 73 mach1 boss 302 to me.
FANADICALCOWHEAD 3 years ago
why dont you look up 69 shelby and see what you get, cause I will bet ya it will look a lot like the 69 in this video dumb fuck.
transam0709 3 years ago
Oh your right ,it is...although they similar however...
FANADICALCOWHEAD 3 years ago
HUH?
scdevon 3 years ago
the front ends confused me.
FANADICALCOWHEAD 3 years ago
mach 1 boss 302 only existed in 69 and 70 you fuckin moron. 73 cars were HUUUGE.
JIMMYJIBLETS 2 years ago
Sorry... I didn't mean to insult anyone. At first glance (Never before seeing a 69 GT500) I assumed it was a 1973, and that the author got the years wrong. After a quick Google search I quickly learned I had mistaken. However that doesn't give you a right to call me a "fucking moron" All I can say to that is that your Immature and need to learn to respect others even though they committed a dumb mistake.
FANADICALCOWHEAD 2 years ago 4
Comment removed
shibbbbbbles 2 years ago
Go home.
FANADICALCOWHEAD 2 years ago
its called a Boss 302, not a Mach 1 Boss
wheeler8801 2 years ago
sorry, i was speaking of two different models, there should be an "and" in between mach 1 and boss 302
JIMMYJIBLETS 2 years ago
did you say that the mach 1 only existed in 69 and 70?
wheeler8801 2 years ago
no that part was for another poster, i know all about 69 70 71 72 73 and the new edge mustang mach 1, etc.
JIMMYJIBLETS 2 years ago
that comment was very poorly worded in hind site lol.
allow me to rephrase it
"thats a mach 1. (now to other user) o and the boss 302 only existed in 69 and 70 you fuckin moron, 73 cars were HUUUGE"
JIMMYJIBLETS 2 years ago
and the 73 was just a little bigger than the 71-72
wheeler8801 2 years ago
73's really arent that big,they just look like it. I have a 69 fastback and a 73 coupe. and when you pull them up even with each other the 73 is only a couple of inches longer. And about the same width.
scwhockey41 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
its not a 69 you fucktard its a 71 and up not sure which
epluribusunom 3 years ago
It's a '69 Shelby and doesnt even look like the Mach 1 so saying fuck you in that same sentence is ehmm really stupid, mark.
I allways liked this model and I agree with jammer96.
There's no arguing over taste but comparing this to the Mach 1.....hmmm....
Jayskiallthewayski 3 years ago
this is not a mach 1 its a shelby gt 500 69 there is one here in my town just the same but blue and its a shelby stupid
thoi84 3 years ago
FUCK YOU ! thats a 70´s MUSTANG MACH ONE !!!! nooooo kiddie shelby !!!!
bortix1933 3 years ago
U Fuckers. Its not a gt500.... try a mach 1 from the 70's. I'll give u guys the props, cool car, but get ur shit right ass holes.
bobsaidhi22 3 years ago
your pretty stupid arnt you, you can evan see the shellby snake emblem...
camgoalie 3 years ago
69 is best year for mustang. mach 1 is nicest looking of all.
camgoalie 3 years ago 2
thats what im screamin!
lilsixbanger 3 years ago
Great looking car. Very overlooked Shelby. They deserve as much respect as the other models.
jammer96 3 years ago 3
i like the 67's and 68's better.
St0n3C07d 3 years ago
exactly
67stang721 3 years ago
hmm...
i cant rly tell, does the shelby look the same as the mustang mach 1 or no??
lobzdik 3 years ago
Nice Shelby! I love those cars! One of the Best Looking Cars ever made! Try taking a video doing a real burn-out, Don't use the brakes! It will be more realistic and show the true power! And by the way, you are not going to hurt it by doing burn-outs! Carroll Shelby designed these cars for much harder use than doing burn-outs! Have Fun!!
thirtysford 3 years ago
Brakes -- my thoughts exactly. If ya ain't got enough power to smoke 'em on a roll-on then don't video. Hell my mom's Honda 4 cyl can do a burnout on the brakes. :)
crankzhaft 3 years ago
Real Nice car man, the best mustang ever made.
oldschoolgodfather 4 years ago
who cares about abused parts ? when they break u replace em. i would only worry about rare parts that cant b bought or repaired.
dfriesen83 4 years ago
My dad had the same car, except it had widened fenders, 10" Mickey Thompsons, a 6 pack fed 428 CJ, 4 speed with a locker.
Kevman76 4 years ago
Not trying to be critical, this is a BEAUTIFUL car, but why do you guys do that?
meddetect10 4 years ago
Are you kidding me? Have you ever tried this? It is so much fun! Go try it and come back and you will have a different comment. :o)
Novaking1975 4 years ago
amen
those cars were ment to be driven hard! all mustangs were built for that!
87mustangguy 4 years ago
if you pay so mutch for it , you goth tho use it !!
666stefke666 4 years ago
why would u do that to a $100,000 car??
waterloo794 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
because its fun
redneck4694 4 years ago 4
if you spend that much on a car you better do something with it instead of letting it sit in a garage for the rest of its life. like these bitch ass collectors do.
disturbedproject 4 years ago
ITs only the tires that are taking a beating
Reaper206 4 years ago
And axles, clutch (or torque converter), cooling system, gearbox, tailshaft, wheel bearings...
You get the picture.
Nekoboy2 4 years ago
those parts arent getting a beatin
back in the day they used real metal
they can handle it
hondas are the ones that cant handle it
87mustangguy 4 years ago 42
That is complete and utter rubbish. They didn't use "real metal" in the clutch, or the radiator, or the axle seals, etc.
No matter how beautiful the car is, it is not immune to the laws of physics.
Nekoboy2 4 years ago
well you gotta warm up the tires some how. burnout isint gonna effect the car that much
disturbedproject 4 years ago
...no comment on such idocey
OmgNinjaOmg 4 years ago
@87mustangguy Today My friend jumped his 97 Honda Accord over a steep set of railroad tracks and ripped the front bumper right off.
PYROSF 1 year ago
take your foot off the brake next time thank you
healeyl 4 years ago
You can't do that in a riceburner. well, it would look rather silly next to that Shelby.
eveningphantom 4 years ago 2
thats awesome, my cousin just sold a 69 gt 500 gulfstream aqua w/ white interior matching numbers
honcrf150 5 years ago
raw american muscle!!
suerguy209 5 years ago
that was great
drewdavison 5 years ago