James Haughey, Roland Clark, Ron Low - Foreskin Restoration Devices

[ThePhantomLash]

42 weeks or months did he say ??

[TLCTugger]

@ThePhantomLash - The "after" photo is from 3.5 years (42 months) of tugging.

Wear a device for 10-12 hours per day. You can add about 3mm / month to the amount of glans you can cover. We measure this while forcing the skin forward with an erection. A really complete restoration might involve being able to force the skin over the WHOLE glans plus another "glans length" past the tip, while erect.

[ThePhantomLash]

@ThePhantomLash Stem Cell hopefully will be up and running before then. Or even regrow it in my stomach as 42 months is a long time man ...

[thegreatestbak]

the pud looks painful...stick to plastics ppl

[xXFREEPOKEMONXx]

I wonder if you can do this with your fingers???

[rationalway]

Hey, Ron! It's been some time. Those devices are just magnificent in their simplicity! Can't wait for stem cells to come up in foreskin restoration!

[xXFREEPOKEMONXx]

me too

[tommyguy4]

Thanks, guys. These three men have done so much for circumcised guys. As someone who is restoring my foreskin, I really appreciate what they do.

[RoseFink]

Wonderful. These devices help men to regain natural motion of a whole penis.

[markmywords53]

There should be a law against selling this kind of thing. The men who do this are psychologically unbalanced and ungrateful to the doctors who circumcised them.

[Fletch6]

Of course men are ungrateful to the doctors that cut off part of their penis without permission.

I'm not sure why you would say that someone is "psychologically unbalanced" for desiring to have back a body part that was unjustly taken away. Would you call a woman that desired breast reconstruction after a mastectomy "psychologically unbalanced"?

[markmywords53]

Women's breasts are pleasing to look at, have a useful function and do no harm to anyone. Foreskins look gross, have no useful function and harbor disease.

[Fletch6]

The foreskin serves a number of functions... the mains ones being protection of the glans and "gliding action".

I used to think foreskins looked gross... then I became educated. I had no idea the vast majority of men in the world were intact. I was very ignorant.

[InMooseWeTrust]

@markmywords53 They keep the penis sensitive. I was circumcised and restored. I know what I'm talking about. The foreskin harbors LESS disease than a cut penis because when a guy is cut, all kinds of debris gets into his urethra. The smegma is a natural disinfectant.

[TheRuindragon]

@InMooseWeTrust I hate my parents for circumcising me. I'll never have the same sensation back. Does restoration give back the sensation?

[InMooseWeTrust]

@TheRuindragon Sorry for the long delay, but yes. Restoration isn't perfect, but it's a hell of a lot better than not having any foreskin at all. I'm wearing the TLC Tugger right now, as I'm writing.

[lesrambles1]

@InMooseWeTrust

well done my uncircumcised brother.

[whatUneverknew]

OMG! That just seems like such a narrow thing to say! I mean there's no law against selling penis pumps, and they can be very dangerous. You're not serious, right? I mean, think what you want about a man's mental stability, but a LAW? That's just not very live & let live of you.