TROM 1: Knowledge [Full] [FTF AudioFix]

[mav19691]

I 110% for science becuz coming from being indoctrinated christian faith & as i see my parents unable to cope & deny the advancements in science & tech i can understand how demoralizing that maybe & your afraid to be proven wrong with out dated concepts & superstititions.that why older folk r sideline & its wrong. so in there lonelines & fear only hope to their creator? we r destructive in ignorance & i believe we r not welcome in other worlds becuz we preach freedom but aparthieid etc =slavery

[PureTeenageIgnorance]

You didn't have to do anything to Hawkings voice I bet.Lol:)

I <3 Science!!

[verificare100]

SCIENCE IS THE PURE TRUTH, CAPITALISM AND POLITICS ARE JUST FALSE AUTHORITIES (the environment is the real authority of wich we realy depend) WHICH NOBODY NEEDS.

SO WE WANT SCIENCE INSTEAD OF FUCKING CAPITALISM AND POLITICS!!! FOREVER!

[thedriftmc]

Very happy to be involved in the voice over team for TROM 2.0! No more robot voices, promise!! ;)

[djhaig]

We need science to see the outer world we call it reality which is about 5 to 8 percent . And we need spirituality to see the inner world which is about the 95 percent, the rest of our DNA that they call it junk DNA and then we can see the dark matter of the outside world...

[Balanceisbeautyful]

I've just created an account to say i definitely like this piece of work except for the unfortunate voice-over... And seriously, how can i use some sort of english language checker while using the comment section and is this really my name for the rest of my youtube life??

[turveyful]

worst made doc ive ever seen.poor

[xjoe1988x]

we walked out of the water.

[ThoseWhoStayUofM]

"This is a misrepresentation of how fundamentally pragmatic science is and a misunderstanding of the relationship between epistemology and science." ~ThoseWhoStayUofM

This is my claim. Nothing in your comment even opposes this claim. Everything in your comment neither supports nor detracts from the validity of that claim. All of it in its entirety is completely moot.

String theory claims that the natural world has 11 dimensions. We have the sensory input devices to experience 4 of those.

[MIKOLBZ]

Damn! Beat me to it ;) I was makin a video like this but yours is better :( lol

[ThoseWhoStayUofM]

This video glorifies science. The creator of this video clearly has a deep seated desire to feel superior to "the masses" and is attempting to satisfy that desire by exclaiming that, because s/he appreciates science in such a way that "the masses" does not, then s/he has a higher level of consciousness and ultimately a more enriched life. This is a misrepresentation of how fundamentally pragmatic science is and a misunderstanding of the relationship between epistemology and science.

[Soonerg2121]

@ThoseWhoStayUofM Well with out science you would not be watching this video.I enjoy science and I'm alive because of it. With out science we would not have medical advancements or technological break through that has enhanced humanity up to this point. I see no such arrogance or any sense of patronizing aspect to this film.What I see here is true social education that shows no bias,no mention of intellectual insults at all. you must understand their is no such thing as limits to knowledge.

[AverageEveryday]

Do you even know the difference between micro evolution and macro evolution? and are you aware that macro evolution has been doctored using the findings of micro evolution to give the theory of evolution any credence at all? the more you write the more obvious it becomes that you really don't know what you are talking about. I want evidence not just something you once heard on TV.

[DustinLT1985]

I find it astonishing that people can watch this video and pass it off as bullshit, and then turn around and believe in such a primitive story like christianity.

[djhardcoretruth]

@DustinLT1985 -- 100% agreed =)

[AverageEveryday]

@DustinLT1985 When looking at religion it is true I really don't know where to look for the truth. I simply search in all areas. I believe in a Creator. But there are allot of issues with religion and Christianity. I'm currently studying The Dead Sea Scrolls to find correlations with the Bible. Looking for answers in the various creation myths around the world also. But evolution is only a theory and should be left at that when the evidence hardly supports it and in fact mostly contradicts it.

[DustinLT1985]

I always skip straight to the kick ass song.. I love science

[AverageEveryday]

Evolution is a religion and it is wrong. We did not evolve into our present state. We were created. Why do you think it is easier to find fossils dating back millions of years than it is to find the so called "missing link"? Science and Quantum Physics are getting closer to God all the time, but most people are not. This world is very confused and needs help.

[scringer12]

@AverageEveryday I suggest you read Darwin and Dawkins. Evolution has mountains of evidence that support it from several scientific disciplines. Everything from the fossil record to vestigial organs and bones to genetics. As far as a missing link, there's no such thing. However, there are several 'missing links' in contrast to your saying there isn't one.  You won't find a single link but you will find many.

[DustinLT1985]

@AverageEveryday How does that not seem absolutely ridiculous while you type it? Dinosaurs alone prove that the creation theory is false.

[AverageEveryday]

@DustinLT1985 how is that so? how do dinosaurs disprove creation? they don't. they just throw a spanner in the works of the timeline derived from the bible, that's all. And besides that, how are we supposed to know just how old those fossils really are? Google the story of the cowboy's leg, foot and boot that were only 100 years old and yet they had managed to fossilize in such short a time. carbon dating isn't as accurate as you would think either. the whole thing is a mess I admit. FLT

[DustinLT1985]

@AverageEveryday Obviously you do not know much about paleontology. You do realize that the crust of the earth culminates over time and that measuring the many layers of crust is a way to date fossil records with pretty good accuracy. The deeper you go the older the species gets. Dinosaurs prove that the earth is billions of years older than modern religion claims. If the earth is billions of years old than the base story of the bible is false, and if the base story is false that usually means.

[AverageEveryday]

@DustinLT1985 I obviously know more than you. Did you know the science of today uses the crust layers to date fossils but they also use the fossils to date the crust layers. That's cyclic reasoning and will only ever have you going round in circles. It's a complete fraud and should not be stated as fact. Please look up what I have just said and you will find I am correct. If you need pointing in the right direction then please ask and I will provide you with some reading and viewing links.

[DustinLT1985]

@AverageEveryday Oh please your so full of shit! The layers of many of earths crusts are differently colored and have different types of creatures, and carbonating is much more accurate than using bible code. Get over it science trumps religion everyday all day because it provides physical proof of its claims or its considered wrong. religion goes on faith and THATS cyclic reasoning because your putting your faith in something you can not see. You base your arguments on a tourist attraction HA!

[AverageEveryday]

@DustinLT1985 Ok, so now you result to name calling. How am I full of shit? And why? Oh yes just because I pointed out that modern science dates fossils by the rock layer they are situated in. But of course they date rock layers by the fossils that are in them. How's that being full of shit. IT'S A FACT. Get a bottle full of water and mud. Give it a good shake. Watch it settle. It won't take a million years to form layers. That's a fact too. And science comes from God my friend.

[DustinLT1985]

@AverageEveryday I have not called you any names and your full of shit because your basing all of your beliefs on theories that have no physical proof. Modern science dates massive layers of rock and mud that have built up over billions of years. I understand the bottle and mud effect but you need to understand that it is a demonstration of what happens over time inside our layer of oxygen. Its like an algebra equation, you need to have a way to check your answers, and carbon dating is the way.

[AverageEveryday]

@DustinLT1985 And you claim science offers physical proof, well offer me some. Trust me I've looked and it's not there as you claim. But I'm serious, round up some proof of evolution and give it to me. If I am wrong I will gladly admit to it and give up my claims on God. That's a fact and a good challenge for you. It will take me some time but I will gladly do the same for you if you wish. I will collect all the evidence I have found over the years for the existence of God and present it to you.

[djhardcoretruth]

@AverageEveryday -- Hahhahahaa evidence for the existence of God.??? This should be good LMFAO bring it on smart guy =) I gotta hear this shit!!

[DustinLT1985]

@djhardcoretruth You and me both bro I'll check this everyday for that kind of claim.

[DustinLT1985]

@AverageEveryday Physical proof: Dinosaurs bone structures are identical to birds and many of the latter evolutions of Dinosaurs also began developing feathers.

[DustinLT1985]

@AverageEveryday I present you with evidence within minutes of reading your claim. I'm still waiting for the same.

[AverageEveryday]

@DustinLT1985 what evidence? please send me some links via a personal email. otherwise I'm not sure what evidence you claim to have provided. as for the evidence I will offer you. as I mentioned, please give me some time to compile it.

[AverageEveryday]

@DustinLT1985 I will give you one piece of evidence for now. Send me a personal message with your email address I will provide photo's. Your claim hinges on the theory these rock layers are millions of years old. And from one layer to another layer represents thousands of years time. Are you aware there are whole petrified tree trunks sat upright and some upside down that pass through many of these layers at once? Do you know what that means? The layers are not millions of years old.

[AverageEveryday]

@DustinLT1985 (cont...) This methodology hides the fact that the extrapolation from micro evolution to hyper evolution is based on metaphysical naturalism; that is, athiest faith rather than being empirically proved.

[AverageEveryday]

@DustinLT1985 (cont...) In teaching evolution it is common practice to conflate small scale, intermediate scale and large scale evolution; that is micro, macro and hyper evolution. Because of this students are typically presented evidence for micro evolution and then lead to assume this proves macro evolution and hyper evolution.

[AverageEveryday]

@DustinLT1985 There are significant problems with evolutionary theory in areas such as the origin of life, origin of genetic code and origin of multi-celular life. There are systematic gaps in the fossil record even in situations where millions of specimins are available for examination. There is a failure to explain how such systems as the developement of irreducably complex molecular machines and complex organs could naturaly evolve at all.

[AverageEveryday]

@DustinLT1985

(3), Many text books use staged pictures of Peppered Moths glued onto tree trunks as evidence of natural selection when it is now known the moths don't normally rest on tree trunks.

(4). And text books don't discuss the fact that fossil evidence of the Cambrian explosion contradicts what you would expect from Darwinian evolution.

[AverageEveryday]

@DustinLT1985

(1), The 1953 Miller-Urey experiment is claimed to show how lifes building blocks could form on early Earth where it is now known the experiment does not work when the correct atmosphere is used.

(2), Many text books use drawing of similarities in vertabrate embreyos as evidence for common ancestry where as it is now known the drawings were faked by the scientist Haeckel.

[AverageEveryday]

@DustinLT1985 In his book 'Icons of Evolution', Biologist Jonathan Wells shows that biology text books systematically misrepresent evidence for evolution, possibly to make a weak case look stronger.

Some examples for you to research at your leasure. (See the following posts)

[djhardcoretruth]

@AverageEveryday -- When will you admit to the MANY flaws of "God/creationism"? When will you point out how MANipulated Holy Texts are as well? Science is willing to accept it's faults and change... unlike Dogmatic Religions. When will you give me the "evidence for the ORIGIN of God"? I'm sorry dude, but you've done nothing but make yourself look foolish. Disproving one thing does not prove another... your attempts at validating creationism this way are completely primitive and feeble.

[AverageEveryday]

@djhardcoretruth ...the flaws in religion or any of my THEORIES. But that's why they are theories and I wasn't the one who brought out a video claiming evolution to be a FACT and so ensuring your foolish appearance to those who know better. Sorry

[AverageEveryday]

@djhardcoretruth It seems you are too quick to make many assumptions about both me and the theory of evolution. So please rectify this before calling me foolish simply based on your assumptions of me. I have to point out that your assumptions of me are very far off the mark. If you want to judge me at least ask me some direct questions first. I will give you an honest answer. Then you can call me what you like, deal?

[AverageEveryday]

@djhardcoretruth I do recall saying I would supply you with evidence for God. I admit this will be hard to do so please give me some time and I'll get back to you. But I don't recall supporting Christianity or the Bible. But consider this, would you agree there can be only two possibilities? Creation and Creator, or Giant Accident and then Evolution. If so, and I cannot see any other options, then surely the more weight I remove from the evidence for evolution the more likely Creation is.

[djhardcoretruth]

@AverageEveryday -- you just like to "appear" as if you have something to offer.... while you muddy the waters of everyone's reality with your self satisfying babble. You obviously don't think about the "terms" you use seriously... did you watch ANY of the videos I posted? Logic says you didn't according to your latter comments. I looked at your channel... you haven't looked at mine, if you did... you would not have shot yourself in the foot so many time with YOUR assumptions =)

[DustinLT1985]

@djhardcoretruth Owned.. My response is coming soon I've just done substantial research on this guys and his beliefs

[djhardcoretruth]

@DustinLT1985 -- if you could have actually proven the TRUTH.... you would have done it WEEKS ago.... now.... I could care less about whatever you're doing. "Owned" LMFAO.... graduate kindergarten already! Hahhaaaa

[DustinLT1985]

@djhardcoretruth LOL dude I'm on your side.. Whats wrong with humorous slang? its all in fun.. What I'm finding is that many of the professionals who specialize in discrediting modern science like this AverageEverday guy does all make very strong claims but have no physical proof of their own to discredit modern science in the first place... and yes it might be childish but you owned averageeveryday.. bad

[djhardcoretruth]

@DustinLT1985 -- oh shit my bad dude... that was totally meant for AverageEveryday.... not you!! I also read your comment as his comment as well.... I'm totally sorry about that man... =)

[djhardcoretruth]

@AverageEveryday

-- FTF Films: SpaceTime VortexReality -- watch?v=-wWimm9LBfI --

-- FTF Films: The Signal -- watch?v=-RTCBhky2wI --

[TheLetsbegin]

Let me tell you why you're here. You're here because you know something. What you know you can't explain, but you feel it. You've felt it your entire life, that there's something wrong with the world. You don't know what it is, but it's there, like a splinter in your mind, driving you mad. It is this feeling that has brought you to me. Do you know what I'm talking about? Think!? U know, U know; we R1: Zero`s + 1`s Namaste ;~))

[scifi73]

"Can you hear me?"

yes I can hear you, and thank you for putting me to sleep for the fourth consecutive night.

whoever made this video is a numbskull... use a better voice modulator, or better yet how about a human's voice. And this music sucks... point blank... It sucks! Video concept is Aok... however, this full length is a terrible idea.zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz­zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz good night>

[OrgonVpH7]

Evolution is just one theory among so many others, has no credibility or consistence. The truth is continuity of diversity in constant change.

Your brain has been polluted with empiricism, which cannot prove (and it will never be able to do it) the inexistence of a creator, instead it will take your freedom away, or kill you.

[DefiantAlex]

@OrgonVpH7 Yeah , 'empiricism' can't prove the inexistence of a creator, but rational rational thought on the other hand doesn't really let this idea survive too long in your head.

All who lack the mental tools needed for this wonderful thing called "rational thought" ignore blatantly obvious data and yell "Allah hu goodbar" before they kill someone or just a simple "in the name of God.".

Empiricism doesn't take freedom away or kill's you , religion on the other hand does. SO "FEACK" OFF.

[DefiantAlex]

@OrgonVpH7 For rational thought you must first discard your personal opinion,can you understand that?

For rational thinking you need facts and data,"I think" has no value,only "I don't know enough about that subject to make a statement/ "opinion"(opinions must be based on facts and data,not on what you think)", can you understand that?

If a religious person would have the necessary "mental tools",that person would NOT CARE what others believe in,they would care about that is actually important.

[OrgonVpH7]

@DefiantAlex

So you're saying that religious persons don't have rational thought because they "lack mental tools" ?!

I say you don't know what rational thought is. Can you explain to me what you think that rational thought is ?

[Joker9588]

@OrgonVpH7 LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO­OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO­OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO­OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO­OOOOOOOOOOOOOL ur dumb.... i'm sorry for you but I prefer to laugh than cry for those whose intelectuality was taken by patriotism, religion and all of your divisionary false notions.

[QuantumGh0st]

47:00 is awesome!

[StarveTheSystem]

Amazing...and very moving.5****