@autokid15 I am skeptical that people affect the world temperature. I know people have great imaginations. And it might be the same to believe in God as it is to believe in your belief.
What's funny is that Perry doesn't believe scientists on evolution or global warming, yet believes a little man in the sky is leading him on a religious crusade to become president. And no gays, homosexual soldiers or non-Christians can stop him.
And he calls Huntsman crazy for believing 98% the scientific community
@autokid15 You make me very sad. I don't know how to convince your kind that Earth is not being warmed by carbon emissions caused by human life. I have to ask you though on what made you believe what you believe. Did any movies effect your position on the global warming topic? I look forward to your response.
@RecklessX9 No, what makes me sad is people who assume another person's beliefs. For instance, where did I state human life is directly responsible for global warming?
No, instead I decided to focus on previous statements made by Bachmann and Perry who both stated that global warming was a false myth.
And no movie influenced my decision, just the lesser intellectual side of the republican GOP
But, humanity is influencing GW, we just didn't start it. All we are is just accelerant on a fire
@cjgoeson he's the next George Bush, did you also catch the contradictory statement about a theory being not proven. A theory is proven as much as anything can be in science
CO2 height to extinction is 40 ft at 380 ppm.. Double CO2 38.8. It cannot change weather. Humans put out less than 1%. Nature 99%. Water is 26 times more effect than CO2...why not ban water? Anybody who believes co2 is a problem is not using the scientific method....
CO2 lags temperature and does not cause temperatures to go up. All this is about is taxes for bankers. Wake up.
@topologyrob A textbook by Al Gore...but reality is that CO2 has NOT can cannot change climate after it is in saturation. The height to extinction lowers with more CO2, just as it does with water, and total energy does not change. For example, once water is pure h2o, putting more filters on cannot make it more pure. Same think with saturation of radiation... More CO2 cannot take out more wavelengths... This is what a Physics textbook says... Sorry, Gore's theory is proven false...
@seaplaneguy1 Don't come on here talking BS, the evidence that humans are making a difference to our climate is overwhelming. 98% of the national academy of science agrees. Not surpassing to see you also watch that 9-11 inside job and nwo conspiracy crap. You are very gullible, and not rational, and before you call me a sheep, actually make an argument, because I know the science behind global warming and I'm more than ready to explain it.
@man444utd Unlike you, I look at all the evidence...like any GOOD scientist is required to do. 98% of national academy...98% of the Priests thought Galileo was wrong. Need I say more? Opinion is NOT science. Your reliance on opinion tells me volumes. I don't give one flying leap of crap about opinion. That is what science is about... Wake up. I am a scientist... The theory is false. From the ice core falsehood, all up and down...fraud. Want a debate...bring it on.
@seaplaneguy1 Opinion? 98% don't just believe for the sake of believing. Do you even know how science works? And comparing religion to science? Are you joking me? If any well respected scientist looked at your channel they would laugh so hard.
@man444utd True, 98% don't believe for the sake of believing, they do it to make money. Follow the money. Want a grant? Write about the devil CO2. Want to kill your career? State the real science. Heard of Climategate? Caught red handed doing your kind of "science" as it were.
Do you believe that the hockey stick is correct? It has been proven total junk. Those same 98% promote the H stick. Clueless...
I know what science is. Mechanical engineer. Gore failed science...
@man444utd True, 98% don't believe for the sake of believing, they do it to make money. Follow the money. Want a grant? Write about the devil CO2. Want to kill your career? State the real science. Heard of Climategate? Caught red handed doing your kind of "science" as it were.
Do you believe that the hockey stick is correct? It has been proven total junk. Those same 98% promote the H stick. Clueless...
I know what science is. Mechanical engineer. Gore failed science...
@man444utd do I Know how science works? How about solving a problem no engineer in the entire auto industry could solve...Porsche, Mecedes, GM, Toyoda, etc. How does on bringing the theory and real world together in a real predictive equation? What the IPCC does is junk...proven by many. You don't exclude data and use opinion. Opinion is not science. Science and religion? Try Galileo, Newton, Einstein...all the greats...used science and religion...
@man444utd do I Know how science works? How about solving a problem no engineer in the entire auto industry could solve...Porsche, Mecedes, GM, Toyoda, etc. How does on bringing the theory and real world together in a real predictive equation? What the IPCC does is junk...proven by many. You don't exclude data and use opinion. Opinion is not science. Science and religion? Try Galileo, Newton, Einstein...all the greats...used science and religion...
@man444utd Why don't you explain just how CO2, which is in saturation above 20-50 ppm, causes more heat to trap. If I wash my car, does it melt because of the heat trapping??? Do you know anything about thermodynamics? Can you read data...or read at all?
So, kindly explain to me just how this evil CO2 is the bain of the world... Waiting....
@seaplaneguy1 The evidence is irrefutable. Temperature drives climate. Temperature changes for a reason. We know that additional GHGs will warm the planet. We can measure the rise in CO2 from burning fossil fuel. It matches the rise in CO2. We can measure the outgoing IR radiation and it is being reduced at the wavelengths blocked by CO2. On the surface we see increased reflected radiation at the wavelengths of CO2. The other reasons that cause temp gain have been largely eliminated. Waiting..
Saying that they've "fact checked" 200 years of science is a positive step. It could be a spontaneous comment from the studio floor, or maybe Fox's"brain room" realizes its viewers are having second thoughts.
@autokid15 I am skeptical that people affect the world temperature. I know people have great imaginations. And it might be the same to believe in God as it is to believe in your belief.
RecklessX9 1 month ago
god i want to fuck her
ihatealigators 1 month ago
WOW...........i give up..........I'll just wait till all these crazy people die and then ill come back.
sfafasfasfsa 2 months ago
What's funny is that Perry doesn't believe scientists on evolution or global warming, yet believes a little man in the sky is leading him on a religious crusade to become president. And no gays, homosexual soldiers or non-Christians can stop him.
And he calls Huntsman crazy for believing 98% the scientific community
autokid15 2 months ago
@autokid15 You make me very sad. I don't know how to convince your kind that Earth is not being warmed by carbon emissions caused by human life. I have to ask you though on what made you believe what you believe. Did any movies effect your position on the global warming topic? I look forward to your response.
RecklessX9 1 month ago
@RecklessX9 No, what makes me sad is people who assume another person's beliefs. For instance, where did I state human life is directly responsible for global warming?
No, instead I decided to focus on previous statements made by Bachmann and Perry who both stated that global warming was a false myth.
And no movie influenced my decision, just the lesser intellectual side of the republican GOP
But, humanity is influencing GW, we just didn't start it. All we are is just accelerant on a fire
autokid15 1 month ago
fox news...brain room...hahahahhaha
adda241 4 months ago
@adda241
It's always empty
mfentruck 2 months ago
It's weird that we are talking about something that is on a global scale.
Buccura 4 months ago
milleniums? - not a word
cjgoeson 5 months ago
@cjgoeson he's the next George Bush, did you also catch the contradictory statement about a theory being not proven. A theory is proven as much as anything can be in science
dk2853 5 months ago
Prepare for global warming! buy a fucking boat and get over it...
stupidplants 5 months ago
fox news = twits
nsdtr01 6 months ago
CO2 height to extinction is 40 ft at 380 ppm.. Double CO2 38.8. It cannot change weather. Humans put out less than 1%. Nature 99%. Water is 26 times more effect than CO2...why not ban water? Anybody who believes co2 is a problem is not using the scientific method....
CO2 lags temperature and does not cause temperatures to go up. All this is about is taxes for bankers. Wake up.
seaplaneguy1 6 months ago
@seaplaneguy1 CO2 both causes and is affected by climate - time for somebody to go back to the textbooks it seems :)
topologyrob 6 months ago
@topologyrob A textbook by Al Gore...but reality is that CO2 has NOT can cannot change climate after it is in saturation. The height to extinction lowers with more CO2, just as it does with water, and total energy does not change. For example, once water is pure h2o, putting more filters on cannot make it more pure. Same think with saturation of radiation... More CO2 cannot take out more wavelengths... This is what a Physics textbook says... Sorry, Gore's theory is proven false...
seaplaneguy1 5 months ago
@seaplaneguy1 Don't come on here talking BS, the evidence that humans are making a difference to our climate is overwhelming. 98% of the national academy of science agrees. Not surpassing to see you also watch that 9-11 inside job and nwo conspiracy crap. You are very gullible, and not rational, and before you call me a sheep, actually make an argument, because I know the science behind global warming and I'm more than ready to explain it.
man444utd 5 months ago
@man444utd Unlike you, I look at all the evidence...like any GOOD scientist is required to do. 98% of national academy...98% of the Priests thought Galileo was wrong. Need I say more? Opinion is NOT science. Your reliance on opinion tells me volumes. I don't give one flying leap of crap about opinion. That is what science is about... Wake up. I am a scientist... The theory is false. From the ice core falsehood, all up and down...fraud. Want a debate...bring it on.
seaplaneguy1 5 months ago
@seaplaneguy1 Opinion? 98% don't just believe for the sake of believing. Do you even know how science works? And comparing religion to science? Are you joking me? If any well respected scientist looked at your channel they would laugh so hard.
man444utd 5 months ago
@man444utd True, 98% don't believe for the sake of believing, they do it to make money. Follow the money. Want a grant? Write about the devil CO2. Want to kill your career? State the real science. Heard of Climategate? Caught red handed doing your kind of "science" as it were.
Do you believe that the hockey stick is correct? It has been proven total junk. Those same 98% promote the H stick. Clueless...
I know what science is. Mechanical engineer. Gore failed science...
seaplaneguy1 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@man444utd True, 98% don't believe for the sake of believing, they do it to make money. Follow the money. Want a grant? Write about the devil CO2. Want to kill your career? State the real science. Heard of Climategate? Caught red handed doing your kind of "science" as it were.
Do you believe that the hockey stick is correct? It has been proven total junk. Those same 98% promote the H stick. Clueless...
I know what science is. Mechanical engineer. Gore failed science...
seaplaneguy1 5 months ago
@man444utd do I Know how science works? How about solving a problem no engineer in the entire auto industry could solve...Porsche, Mecedes, GM, Toyoda, etc. How does on bringing the theory and real world together in a real predictive equation? What the IPCC does is junk...proven by many. You don't exclude data and use opinion. Opinion is not science. Science and religion? Try Galileo, Newton, Einstein...all the greats...used science and religion...
My channel is not a science channel.
seaplaneguy1 5 months ago
@man444utd do I Know how science works? How about solving a problem no engineer in the entire auto industry could solve...Porsche, Mecedes, GM, Toyoda, etc. How does on bringing the theory and real world together in a real predictive equation? What the IPCC does is junk...proven by many. You don't exclude data and use opinion. Opinion is not science. Science and religion? Try Galileo, Newton, Einstein...all the greats...used science and religion...
My channel is not a science channel.
seaplaneguy1 5 months ago
@man444utd Why don't you explain just how CO2, which is in saturation above 20-50 ppm, causes more heat to trap. If I wash my car, does it melt because of the heat trapping??? Do you know anything about thermodynamics? Can you read data...or read at all?
So, kindly explain to me just how this evil CO2 is the bain of the world... Waiting....
seaplaneguy1 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@seaplaneguy1 The evidence is irrefutable. Temperature drives climate. Temperature changes for a reason. We know that additional GHGs will warm the planet. We can measure the rise in CO2 from burning fossil fuel. It matches the rise in CO2. We can measure the outgoing IR radiation and it is being reduced at the wavelengths blocked by CO2. On the surface we see increased reflected radiation at the wavelengths of CO2. The other reasons that cause temp gain have been largely eliminated. Waiting..
man444utd 5 months ago
1:00 is hilarious.
SuperHappyCow 6 months ago
Saying that they've "fact checked" 200 years of science is a positive step. It could be a spontaneous comment from the studio floor, or maybe Fox's"brain room" realizes its viewers are having second thoughts.
AustinCZ 6 months ago