@tegaffer, Exactly. I could be entirely wrong about the spelling of the word. Also, both Latin and the Greek used in the New Testament are dead languages, so we can't be certain how any of the words were pronounced. However, we can tell, from the word usage that this was the name of a man in the text. The word "Christ" was a title-not someone's name in the New Testament.
you are superb in your findings and will come up against scholars who will try to stop you and say your findings are not true ,this is superb material you need to write a book on this subject keep any further research you have for a book else some one else will steal it from you and rush to the book publishers and get it printed
Yes, well, it may well turn out that I am wrong about Chastus, but my intent was simply to get perple to realize that what was stated in this text, is certainly not the cut and dry proof for Jesus, as the Church claims it to be. The Chrestians sound more like a group of terrorists. Of course we have a group like that today, that also claims that it preaches only peace.
So, glad to live in an age of knowledge, when considering that no such person was known as Jesus. Until, after 1066 with the Norman invasion of England the letter "J" was introduced into Old English lanquage. The Hexpala with all original trans. shows the name of Iesus not Jesus was known to the english speaking world. This sc-Jesus fiqure seems to be disappearing as time progresses. Tacitus, like Josephesus eliminates any traces of this sc-son of god.
There is a link posted for the research for Part 1. This video is my own research. If you look closely, you will see a loop in the middle of the "r", which if it was an "r", would not exist, as Latin "r" was made just like a "t", but with a longer stem.
Yes, I attended a Baptist ministerial training school for nearly three years, and left after discovering some of the material that I now cover in my videos.
to be fair there was a dispute on how to spell and pronouce his name at the time on the roman side of things
tegaffer 1 month ago
@tegaffer, Exactly. I could be entirely wrong about the spelling of the word. Also, both Latin and the Greek used in the New Testament are dead languages, so we can't be certain how any of the words were pronounced. However, we can tell, from the word usage that this was the name of a man in the text. The word "Christ" was a title-not someone's name in the New Testament.
ForBibletruth 1 month ago
interesting
sinnfeinmurderers 2 years ago
Glorious Biblical Mythology
DreadfulSolemnity 2 years ago
you are superb in your findings and will come up against scholars who will try to stop you and say your findings are not true ,this is superb material you need to write a book on this subject keep any further research you have for a book else some one else will steal it from you and rush to the book publishers and get it printed
lz127graf 2 years ago
Fascinating.
Good work man.
NeutronBalm 2 years ago
chastus seems to be etymologically connected to "chastity" or "CASTration". "Castration" may be a Roman reference to circumcisers.
Also, "chaestianos", might they be worshipers of Hestia, who dealt with open flame?
IWannabeJew 2 years ago
Yes, well, it may well turn out that I am wrong about Chastus, but my intent was simply to get perple to realize that what was stated in this text, is certainly not the cut and dry proof for Jesus, as the Church claims it to be. The Chrestians sound more like a group of terrorists. Of course we have a group like that today, that also claims that it preaches only peace.
ForBibletruth 2 years ago
or the ''flamines''.
lipoicacid 2 years ago
So, glad to live in an age of knowledge, when considering that no such person was known as Jesus. Until, after 1066 with the Norman invasion of England the letter "J" was introduced into Old English lanquage. The Hexpala with all original trans. shows the name of Iesus not Jesus was known to the english speaking world. This sc-Jesus fiqure seems to be disappearing as time progresses. Tacitus, like Josephesus eliminates any traces of this sc-son of god.
mril80 3 years ago
did you figure this out on your own or where did you find this?
SprolesIsGod43 3 years ago
There is a link posted for the research for Part 1. This video is my own research. If you look closely, you will see a loop in the middle of the "r", which if it was an "r", would not exist, as Latin "r" was made just like a "t", but with a longer stem.
ForBibletruth 3 years ago
im just wondering do you have any professional theological training of some sort or have you just been studying theology for a while...
Cephas113 2 years ago
Yes, I attended a Baptist ministerial training school for nearly three years, and left after discovering some of the material that I now cover in my videos.
ForBibletruth 2 years ago