Added: 2 years ago
From: timelord50
Views: 21,141
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (52)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Fake 3D u.u

  • I don't wish to be unkind but: Fail. And you are quite wrong about 3D "requiring" 2 cameras. Most 3D movies now are shot in 2D and 3D is applied in post via cheap labor, manually with some software that does depth queuing. Your separation is way way way off the mark, only set for your size screen and distance rather than an average. The separation also needs to vary. You could have at least masked the stars and done them as a different layer to give some depth. Keep trying, you'll get it right.

  • "Yeah. Sorry, thought I fixed that." Too funny. :D

  • This is NOT 3D

  • theres no depth in this video, people dont understand that for effective 3d effects, you need 2 cameras spaced apart from each other. pretty much the only way to convert 2d to 3d is if the original 2d video has a regulated panning movement then you can use the same video with an offset and one frame is ahead of the other

  • @TimeLord75 i like to say yes granted i tried to sort the depth out buy making 1 video pulled forward slightly but as you said without having the 2 cameras its difficult but you must admit for a 2d to 3d it aint that bad

  • WOAHHH GREAT job!!

  • Pause at 0:37 you can see her plain ass :D

  • Saw it in cinema

  • How do you make something 2d into 3d?

  • Although it is funny how theres a 3D doctor who trailer on the bbc youtube page.

    suspisious and theres a 3d trailer for doctor who at the cinema

  • Who ever made this well done i'm impressed :-)

  • i take that as a personal comment i made it :P

  • it dosn't work =(

  • The new vortex is very Sam Raimi.

  • I'd say this is the 2D version with its colours split, as others are saying, but it certainly plays well as an anaglyph, through red/cyan glasses. It works pretty well really and I have seen far worse. Even sloppy 2D colour split rip-offs can be pleasing to the eye through red/cyan glasses. I'm twitching with excitement at the thought of just how effing cool this will look in RealD 3D on a cinema screen! I wanted to see Alice in Wonderland anyway, but now...crikey, I might break into the cinema!

  • OBVIOUSLY Im Not gonna take a video cam into the cinema and film theres am i just be thankful i could do this

  • what are u talking about cinema it a tv program

  • this is being played in front of the new alice in wonderland movie....IN 3D!!!!!!. but hey does anyone know if thats going to get played in america or not. since its delayed here 2 weeks after it premiers in the UK, i thought maybe it would get played on a different 3D movie in a few weeks. but i dont know.

  • alice in wonderland movie is in the uk in 3D so it mite be on the front of that live you say or some over 3D flim

  • @Hi675445

    dont mean to offend you but its not fake it was on TV

  • thats not what he means he means the 3d part is fake not the trailer

  • @timelord50

    ogh

  • @Hi675445 its not fake u dumbass noob

  • Its in 3D!!

  • The new YouTube player doesn't show the drop down menu. YouTube really thought it through...not

  • this isnt in 3D. ive tried the cross eye and red/cyan glasses. im pretty sure this is just the regular 2d trailer with its colours split.

  • its not true 3d

  • cool i noticed the dalek is saying "STATE YOUR IDENTITY" so maybe they are asking who the doctor is!!

  • Lol, i love how the 3D works with my snowgoggles!

    Ha.

  • really haha cool

  • Tridef Media Experience using it's Tridef Media Player captured with fraps would give more depth

    to the trailer.

  • I think it's converted with 3dfier whereas the BBC paid good money to have it converted professionally but I heard it'll only be shown in cinemas unless the BBC post it on youtube.

  • I have this on my channel aswell :D

  • I am picturing everyone who watches this video running off to fetch their own little pair of 3d glasses! LOL.

  • Awesome, thanks for posting this :) xx Worked well for me too

  • Obviously it's faked, since the original wasn't shot in 3D. But, it's an evolution made with the video at hand. It's an interesting start to me.

  • well this is the 2d version of the 3d which was made for the cinema i got this from the tv advert, im currently working on another one to add more depth to make it more realistic

  • Was the cinema one shot in 3d or faked itself? I'm more familiar with the "crosseyed" technique. I have a camera lens that shoots in that effect. One thing with the side-by-side aspect is that it may eliminate the problem with color-blindness.

  • Oh and I meant 'faked' in the sense that you were not working with the 3d footage. You were recreating the 3d footage. (Unless I'm confused. *chuckles*)

  • I wasn't aware that color-blindness affected anaglyph 3D. The person's disability wouldn't prevent the light from being blocked by the colored lenses. Where's the problem?

    I'm not trying to be snippy. I'm curious as a filmmaker attempting to break into 3D.

  • I may be making a huge presumption. But, if they can't see red or green, the tinting effect of the "glasses" may be lost on them. From a comment Combom had made, I was thinking he might be colorblind. A lot of mind tricks depend on the users ability to see the trick.

  • But the red/blue light is already filtered out and separated by the time the image reaches the viewer's eyes.

    Each eye (more or less) receives a simple tinted image, either red or blue. Why would the eyes need to distinguish between the colors at that point?

    Likewise, there is a version of anaglyph that uses red/green. It seems to me like that might even make for a more pleasant viewing experience for red/green colorblind people who won't be able to tell the difference between the two lenses.

  • well i can't control the layout for the 3D viewing as its an already added extra if u like below the video

    that is only created because i added the yt3d:enable=true a guy has spent plenty of time creat this add on so practically what you see is what you get.

  • Well that's not what I meant, but I don't think I'm being clear enough. So...

    YAY DOCTOR!

  • @CubeGuy lol

  • Kinda just has depth for me.... Otherwise I wouldn't really say 3D

  • glad it works as i said before its the true 3D buts its the best i could with what i had at hand :P

  • works great for me!

  • now aspect ratio is OK but this is still a faked 3D video (see my commet to take 2)

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more