@Insaneagram That's like saying the wind produces effects on water, therefore water originates in wind. "Cause and effect" is not a good system to contain Ideas.
@alexandrepiedade I probably didn't word what I said right at all... But I essentially mean, that ideas are inspired form something else, based off something else. They never just occur, uniquely, I mean look at everything, it's always similar to something and people's idea's are influenced by their life, and other's lives.
I don't agree with his definition of magic. I would consider magic as an event that contradicts the laws of physics, not a creation that came into being in a way that is consistent with the laws of physics. If you see magic as any creation, magic is very widespread and scientiffically explainable. The word magic would be worth less if you define it in this way. So I think there is no real magic according to the definition I gave.
@dekippiesip magic never violates laws of nature. not possible. when Einstein spontaneously conceived of the theory of relativity, that's the kind of magic Moore is talking about. Magick is about consciousness connecting with the transcendent and bringing that insight down unto the physical plane. magick isn't just any creation--it must be a full creation, from idea to form to materialization. In 99% of contexts, scribbling on a paper is not art. Because there's no idea or form.
Paging Robert Plant. Paging Robert Plant. Malkovich, Malkowitch, Malkovitch. Stanley Kubrick coming through. Stanley Kubrick I see you. Jerry Garcia can you hear me? Roger Waters do you revere me? Thank you Jesus.
Some art historians are even talking about the viewer's interaction with the artwork being most important. So sadly Alan Moore, should really stop using a piece of art as an example as it's idea is evolved from the artist, the artist's society, and how audiences now, and in the past, interpreted it. An artwork's meaning evolves. Basically Alan Moore is wrong. On this account at least.
Art history nerd here, Moore interestingly talked about a work of art being created by an idea. He reminds me so much of Bellori and that school's focus on the artist being sole creator of an artwork. However I think more art historians now discuss artwork in relation to the artist and the artist's society, Clarke's arguments for socio-historical analysis for example. Artworks are created by the artist, but that artist is influenced by their context.
Sometimes, but not always. Like an idea popping into your head from no reasonable source. The bulk of the idea, at least. Not necessarily the whole thing.
There is very little real magic in the modern world. There is almost no healing magic. Civilization, as one of it's functions, the destruction of healing magic. That makes us all more controllable. Magic has something to do with the imagination. We all get our imagination from the system, from television and the state educational system. Alan Moore, I distrust you as I distrust anyone who has been allowed to inform me.
you poor guy, there's no reason to waste your life being so suspicous of others. We can only ever learn from each other.
Its also a shame that you believe your imagination is a construct created by 3rd parties, it seems to me with the statement you've just told the world that your imagination is ticking along quite nicely on its own.
Nature is pure war with every man against another. Fear of death is the only way to keep the peace, so man is civilized by the threat of violence against him for transgressions upon his neighbor.
Nature does not care. Nature does not need human permission. Nature is the only eternal victor. Nature kills everything.
Human dissatisfaction with mortality drives the ignorant to reach out for an eternal ideal and "magic." (or magick)
@SirWinstonChurchill Nature doesn't intend to kill? it doesn't set out conciously to make everything shit. If that was the case why is it possible that we are even in existance. There is no war between man and nature or man and man, least not in the sense you describe.
Everything dies. There is no eternal life. There is no eternal earth... Nature kills everything... Nature is chaos... Nature is war...
Darkness exists independently of all else in the universe. Without darkness, there is no light and no time. Within the darkness is chaos, which is also nature, matter, antimatter and motion, which is also time.
Everything is in motion except for darkness, because darkness exists with or without anything else and in all places it seems to be.
@SirWinstonChurchill What I am saying is that nature doesn't conciously set out to kill, it may well do, but it also creates in the same way it "kills". On the subject of matter and energy then yes eternal Earth and life does exist because the matter of what was will be recycled for something else eventually. You haven't reached the ultimate conclusion for everyone, youve chosen that conclusion for yourself. Which is fine, but it doesn't necessarily apply beyond your own personal dogmas.
If you choose to see the universe as chaotic, then you can logically accept the notion of your own being, rationalising the irrational chaos that goes on forever.
If you see the universe as the absolute/quantum vacuum that goes on forever, then you logically undermine your own being.
Either are 100% true, but cannot be part of the same reality, they directly imply, define, or counterbalance, each other.
Your choice employs magical thinking: just decide and it is so.
Buenaventura Durruti was killed by the stalinist intelligence and that kind of socialist regimen was a totalitarian regimen just as a fascist regimen is.
We the anarchists with historical memory know about all the rethoric methods of the "democratic" republics and their lefts and rights, whom just wants to mantain the political and economical control no matter the cost: breaking human rigths.- work, education, security, etc.
I love the people you can find when watching crazy videos on Youtube. Yesterday, I found a guy who believes North Korea is a paradise. Another time I found a guy who spends all his free time covertly filming women's feet.
The anarchists I saw in DC were suited up, and were preparing to trash local shops later that evening. They were (of course) being sheltered by, and talking amicably with, Bolshevik ISO organisers of the ANSWER protest group there.
But you know better, of course, because of your enthusiastic swearing.
Did I mention that many anarchists I've met also tend to be accomplished liars? Wouldn't want to leave that out.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Liked the movie, hated the comic. For similar reasons to why Moore loved his comic and hated the movie adaptation. The sequence I have up is a perfect example - that film clip is well above and beyond what the comic itself presents.
I dunno. Maybe I finally got sick of listening to this Leftist nutter's prattle after almost thirty-odd years of it. Maybe the sudden renewed interest has pushed my ire over the limit. Don't see how this is "lame", but you're entitled to your own opinion.
From a historical perspective this is incorrect. The idea that anarchists are anything other than hard left is very new, probably no more than 30 years old, and as a popular idea much, much younger. Anarchists and other socialists have always worked together and the mainstream of anarchism now is still strongly leftist in affiliation the world over.
Just ask to spanish civil war anarchists veterans about their feelings to U.S.S.R., Stalin and dogmatic marxists... Buenaventura Durruti was killed by the stalinist intelligence and that kind of socialist regimen was a totalitarian regimen just as a facist regimen.
Stalin and his followers were called, at the time, the right wing of the Bolshevic party. Left Marxism is an old term to refer to those followers of Marx, like Rosa Luxemburg, who remained politically leftist whilst still being communists. These are the traditional allies of the anarchists, as organisations wuch as the IWW demonstrate.
Just ask to spanish civil war anarchists veterans about their feelings to U.S.S.R., Stalin and dogmatic marxists... Buenaventura Durruti was killed by the stalinist intelligence and that kind of socialist regimen was a totalitarian regimen just as a facist regimen.
Just ask to spanish civil war anarchists veterans about their feelings to U.S.S.R., Stalin and dogmatic marxists... Buenaventura Durruti was killed by the stalinist intelligence and that kind of socialist regimen was a totalitarian regimen just as a facist regimen.
Just ask to spanish civil war anarchists veterans about their feelings to U.S.S.R., Stalin and dogmatic marxists... Buenaventura Durruti was killed by the stalinist intelligence and that kind of socialist regimen was a totalitarian regimen just as a facist regimen.
did the big bang really happen, or is that just the most logical explanation we can currently come up with, with our feeble unevolved human minds? Maybe the universe is constructed in such a way it is much to complex and possibly even contradictory to our current perception of reality the we can't even comprehend the truth at this stage in our evolution.
that we cannot even begin to comprehend unless we realise that we need to experience all that there is and say what we feel of it. No passivity or blind choice in idealogies and prescribed destinies but a world of vision and individual freedom in which we can fathom the dark mines of hell and the golden valleys of highest heaven and bring back what we learn along the way.
To move us towards a greater understanding of human experience and the imagination.
Imho, I think you should give the Watchmen movie a second chance. I'm a big fan of the comic, and I don't think a better version could realistically be done.
Moloch was in it, played by Matt Frewer/Max Headroom.
Of course things had to be cut for a movie version. A mini-series, 3 part movie would have been great, but was not financially feasible.
I have a few nitpicks of course, but I thought it was wonderful.
Religion is nothing more of an outward projection of the human dualistic mind and the ego's attempt to disect the self and understand it while prisoned in our unenlightened state of being. The kingdom is within. Peace.
i some times go to a place in wales they call it the farm but its not a farm in the sense of animals running around every where its a kind of retreat for hippys,he owns the land and property there,i would go there to see friends who live on the farm and would pick magic mushrooms from the hills that surround the place.he also lives just up the road from me.
Respect others opinions, I read the Bible and I do magic. I don't buy anything from the Christian, just another solar cult in my opinion. Watch Zeitgeist my friend
I think that Alan Moore is explain a very complex spiritual idea about the Word becoming reality in a vry simplistic fashion. This ties fully in with qabalistic thought.
I think it's most likely because they are all from Great Britain (Morrison is from Scotland, the other two are from England). In Great Britain, fantasy literature and comic books are much more tied up with faerie stories than they are in North America. Plus, Gaiman and Moore know each other personally.
He sounds a heck of a lot like Steve Coogan as Tommy Saxondale, and I checked on wiki and both Moore and the Saxondale character are from the East Midlands... wild!
He's a great writer! As far as the magic stuff goes, he's just repeating the same ideas, but it's very cool he's doing it on such a massive scale and is not afraid to look "ignorant" to the ignorant. All anyone has to do is TRY magic, to see that it works. A Qabalistic pathworking, for instance. The fact that it is REAL is why people don't care if they're disbelieved. The smartest men have always been into magic.
This man is not an idiot...I think the word you're looking for is 'amazing' as he is one, if not the greatist comic writers of his generation and probably has more spectaculer thoughts every few minutes than some people have in a whole lifetime.
hmm, see I think everything comes from something, ideas are inspired by something else etc. Cause and effect...
Insaneagram 3 weeks ago
@Insaneagram That's like saying the wind produces effects on water, therefore water originates in wind. "Cause and effect" is not a good system to contain Ideas.
alexandrepiedade 4 days ago
@alexandrepiedade I probably didn't word what I said right at all... But I essentially mean, that ideas are inspired form something else, based off something else. They never just occur, uniquely, I mean look at everything, it's always similar to something and people's idea's are influenced by their life, and other's lives.
Insaneagram 3 days ago
magic is also a sexual fetish
rayblack2004 6 months ago
Its quite amazing how you can make stuff from whats around you.What you do with that stuff is another matter.
GavinS1965 7 months ago
I don't agree with his definition of magic. I would consider magic as an event that contradicts the laws of physics, not a creation that came into being in a way that is consistent with the laws of physics. If you see magic as any creation, magic is very widespread and scientiffically explainable. The word magic would be worth less if you define it in this way. So I think there is no real magic according to the definition I gave.
dekippiesip 9 months ago
@dekippiesip magic never violates laws of nature. not possible. when Einstein spontaneously conceived of the theory of relativity, that's the kind of magic Moore is talking about. Magick is about consciousness connecting with the transcendent and bringing that insight down unto the physical plane. magick isn't just any creation--it must be a full creation, from idea to form to materialization. In 99% of contexts, scribbling on a paper is not art. Because there's no idea or form.
aneeley 9 months ago
Paging Robert Plant. Paging Robert Plant. Malkovich, Malkowitch, Malkovitch. Stanley Kubrick coming through. Stanley Kubrick I see you. Jerry Garcia can you hear me? Roger Waters do you revere me? Thank you Jesus.
gusanotaylor 10 months ago
Some art historians are even talking about the viewer's interaction with the artwork being most important. So sadly Alan Moore, should really stop using a piece of art as an example as it's idea is evolved from the artist, the artist's society, and how audiences now, and in the past, interpreted it. An artwork's meaning evolves. Basically Alan Moore is wrong. On this account at least.
judy3437 10 months ago
Art history nerd here, Moore interestingly talked about a work of art being created by an idea. He reminds me so much of Bellori and that school's focus on the artist being sole creator of an artwork. However I think more art historians now discuss artwork in relation to the artist and the artist's society, Clarke's arguments for socio-historical analysis for example. Artworks are created by the artist, but that artist is influenced by their context.
judy3437 10 months ago
Fuck it, Alan Moore should rule the world.
binarynightmare 1 year ago
demonstrably
kungfuhustler84 1 year ago 2
If there really is magic, I don't believe it is the supernatural kind or whatever.
connerjd 1 year ago
Alan Moore: Somehow both mad as a hatter, and the sanest man in the world today.
c225b 1 year ago
ideas formed from the correlation of past experience?
fallingrateofprofit 1 year ago
@fallingrateofprofit
Sometimes, but not always. Like an idea popping into your head from no reasonable source. The bulk of the idea, at least. Not necessarily the whole thing.
binarynightmare 1 year ago
There is very little real magic in the modern world. There is almost no healing magic. Civilization, as one of it's functions, the destruction of healing magic. That makes us all more controllable. Magic has something to do with the imagination. We all get our imagination from the system, from television and the state educational system. Alan Moore, I distrust you as I distrust anyone who has been allowed to inform me.
JasonDamisch 1 year ago
@JasonDamisch very good, do you trust anyone though?
please share :)
Samuelthemule 1 year ago
@JasonDamisch
you poor guy, there's no reason to waste your life being so suspicous of others. We can only ever learn from each other.
Its also a shame that you believe your imagination is a construct created by 3rd parties, it seems to me with the statement you've just told the world that your imagination is ticking along quite nicely on its own.
boomptyboompty 1 year ago
@JasonDamisch
Nature is pure war with every man against another. Fear of death is the only way to keep the peace, so man is civilized by the threat of violence against him for transgressions upon his neighbor.
Nature does not care. Nature does not need human permission. Nature is the only eternal victor. Nature kills everything.
Human dissatisfaction with mortality drives the ignorant to reach out for an eternal ideal and "magic." (or magick)
Moore will surely die like the rest of us.
SirWinstonChurchill 1 year ago
@SirWinstonChurchill Nature doesn't intend to kill? it doesn't set out conciously to make everything shit. If that was the case why is it possible that we are even in existance. There is no war between man and nature or man and man, least not in the sense you describe.
LEOSAYSAYS 1 year ago
@LEOSAYSAYS
Everything dies. There is no eternal life. There is no eternal earth... Nature kills everything... Nature is chaos... Nature is war...
Darkness exists independently of all else in the universe. Without darkness, there is no light and no time. Within the darkness is chaos, which is also nature, matter, antimatter and motion, which is also time.
Everything is in motion except for darkness, because darkness exists with or without anything else and in all places it seems to be.
SirWinstonChurchill 1 year ago
@SirWinstonChurchill What I am saying is that nature doesn't conciously set out to kill, it may well do, but it also creates in the same way it "kills". On the subject of matter and energy then yes eternal Earth and life does exist because the matter of what was will be recycled for something else eventually. You haven't reached the ultimate conclusion for everyone, youve chosen that conclusion for yourself. Which is fine, but it doesn't necessarily apply beyond your own personal dogmas.
LEOSAYSAYS 1 year ago
I created poop. Tada!
phishwithextracheese 1 year ago
Save the magic.
scag15 1 year ago
If you choose to see the universe as chaotic, then you can logically accept the notion of your own being, rationalising the irrational chaos that goes on forever.
If you see the universe as the absolute/quantum vacuum that goes on forever, then you logically undermine your own being.
Either are 100% true, but cannot be part of the same reality, they directly imply, define, or counterbalance, each other.
Your choice employs magical thinking: just decide and it is so.
It all hangs in the balance!
natmanprime 1 year ago
majic is at the edge of perception.
The issue is what you consider 'something' and what you consider 'nothing'.
'nothing' is just something that's beyond your perception, like atoms in the air, etc.
space is subatomic chaos.
chaos is what's beyond one's understanding.
the quantum vacuum is the absolute, the counterbalance to chaos, directly implying.
Given that 'something' and 'nothing' are a matter of perception, the subjective point at which something is brought into being from chaos is magic.
natmanprime 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
WOW Alan Moore is stupid.
SaintHierophant 2 years ago
You are incorrect
enjoypolydor 2 years ago 4
Read Watchmen first. We'll talk of that after.
ValentineDelatour 2 years ago
haha Allan Moore is amazing.
baysidekidd 2 years ago 12
He is clearly stoned :P
zzzyax 2 years ago
@zzzyax
Impossible, his beard would not allow it.
Sinthetic1230 2 years ago 2
Just ask to spanish civil war anarchists veterans about their feelings to U.S.S.R., Stalin and dogmatic marxists...
retrodarth 2 years ago
Buenaventura Durruti was killed by the stalinist intelligence and that kind of socialist regimen was a totalitarian regimen just as a fascist regimen is.
retrodarth 2 years ago
We the anarchists with historical memory know about all the rethoric methods of the "democratic" republics and their lefts and rights, whom just wants to mantain the political and economical control no matter the cost: breaking human rigths.- work, education, security, etc.
retrodarth 2 years ago
I love the people you can find when watching crazy videos on Youtube. Yesterday, I found a guy who believes North Korea is a paradise. Another time I found a guy who spends all his free time covertly filming women's feet.
raunchbear 2 years ago 4
creativity he's talking about is not creating something from nothing - it's just changing what already is, mixing, putting in other context and so on.
magic is like:
- how did you do it? it's great
- i don't know... magic
which means - i don't know - i can't reproduce the result because I've got no idea how it happened (lost of so called inspiration).
it would be better to know and calling it magic really doesn't make it easier
I do like to disagree with people :P
kid29a 2 years ago 3
i was gonna type that but you beat me to it
you are quite right
Alan is wrong
natmanprime 2 years ago
The anarchists I saw in DC were suited up, and were preparing to trash local shops later that evening. They were (of course) being sheltered by, and talking amicably with, Bolshevik ISO organisers of the ANSWER protest group there.
But you know better, of course, because of your enthusiastic swearing.
Did I mention that many anarchists I've met also tend to be accomplished liars? Wouldn't want to leave that out.
DrCruel 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Liked the movie, hated the comic. For similar reasons to why Moore loved his comic and hated the movie adaptation. The sequence I have up is a perfect example - that film clip is well above and beyond what the comic itself presents.
I dunno. Maybe I finally got sick of listening to this Leftist nutter's prattle after almost thirty-odd years of it. Maybe the sudden renewed interest has pushed my ire over the limit. Don't see how this is "lame", but you're entitled to your own opinion.
DrCruel 2 years ago
An anarchist is never a leftist you mofo!
we don´t see left or right but over and below. ASSHOLE DR CUNT
retrodarth 2 years ago 3
From a historical perspective this is incorrect. The idea that anarchists are anything other than hard left is very new, probably no more than 30 years old, and as a popular idea much, much younger. Anarchists and other socialists have always worked together and the mainstream of anarchism now is still strongly leftist in affiliation the world over.
wid85 2 years ago
Just ask to spanish civil war anarchists veterans about their feelings to U.S.S.R., Stalin and dogmatic marxists... Buenaventura Durruti was killed by the stalinist intelligence and that kind of socialist regimen was a totalitarian regimen just as a facist regimen.
retrodarth 2 years ago
Stalin and his followers were called, at the time, the right wing of the Bolshevic party. Left Marxism is an old term to refer to those followers of Marx, like Rosa Luxemburg, who remained politically leftist whilst still being communists. These are the traditional allies of the anarchists, as organisations wuch as the IWW demonstrate.
wid85 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Just ask to spanish civil war anarchists veterans about their feelings to U.S.S.R., Stalin and dogmatic marxists... Buenaventura Durruti was killed by the stalinist intelligence and that kind of socialist regimen was a totalitarian regimen just as a facist regimen.
retrodarth 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Just ask to spanish civil war anarchists veterans about their feelings to U.S.S.R., Stalin and dogmatic marxists... Buenaventura Durruti was killed by the stalinist intelligence and that kind of socialist regimen was a totalitarian regimen just as a facist regimen.
retrodarth 2 years ago
Well, Anarchy is akin to science, to Darwin's evolution, to emergence theory, it is the way the world functions, the way biology evolved over time.
Liberalism and conservatism are an illusion, they are the result of the chemical composition of the brain.
In the absence of the state there will be liberals and there will be conservatives, and they will both pursue their own interests.
To suggest that liberty is one ideology or another is impotent dogmatism.
Jcolinsol 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Just ask to spanish civil war anarchists veterans about their feelings to U.S.S.R., Stalin and dogmatic marxists... Buenaventura Durruti was killed by the stalinist intelligence and that kind of socialist regimen was a totalitarian regimen just as a facist regimen.
retrodarth 2 years ago
I throw rocks at Alan Moore's feeble world.
DrCruel 2 years ago
Were you born lame, or do you have to work at it?
StevenErnest 2 years ago
But I see you have a scene from Watchmen on your channel, so perhaps I misunderstood you?
StevenErnest 2 years ago
Alan Moore ROCKS YOUR FEEBLE WORLD.
thecomposer1962 2 years ago 22
I think i generally like this guy and his character, but he provides no argument for his claim that a thought comes from nothing.
falsedeal 2 years ago 3
Then where does it come from?
If not the dark nothingness of a transdimensional vacuum ... then where?
Experience?
Where does experience come from - birth?
Who designed the human seed?
What created the planet?
What created the big bang?
Where did that energy come from?
"no-thing"
earthheavenharmonics 2 years ago
did the big bang really happen, or is that just the most logical explanation we can currently come up with, with our feeble unevolved human minds? Maybe the universe is constructed in such a way it is much to complex and possibly even contradictory to our current perception of reality the we can't even comprehend the truth at this stage in our evolution.
Billcot1 2 years ago
Yes I agree. Us being here is a mystery
that we cannot even begin to comprehend unless we realise that we need to experience all that there is and say what we feel of it. No passivity or blind choice in idealogies and prescribed destinies but a world of vision and individual freedom in which we can fathom the dark mines of hell and the golden valleys of highest heaven and bring back what we learn along the way.
To move us towards a greater understanding of human experience and the imagination.
13thfloor18 2 years ago 2
the origins of ideas can be traced
karlschultz87 2 years ago
A pint IS a magical act, isn't it?
blind51de 2 years ago
He is right. By definition of magic, making your thoughts and desires a reality is technically... MAGIC! :D
quitejaded 2 years ago 2
Magic splits things up. Its kind of the weak way forward. Theres a better way.
duncan36 2 years ago
I have identified several instances of Occult symbolism in 'Watchmen'.
Google WATCHMEN UNMASKED.
thecomposer1962 3 years ago
Would you care to give a couple examples? Sounds interesting.
StevenErnest 2 years ago
Google WATCHMEN UNMASKED!
I'll give plenty.
thecomposer1962 2 years ago
most if not all of his work is loaded with occult symbolism. he's an occultist, that's nothing new.
nofix3 2 years ago
Well, you've obviously read him, you're really not who I am addressing. Did you see that awful Watchmen movie ?
Moloch, Pandemonium and The Spear are all completely excised from it.
Just trying to hep up the kidz who don't get what the Squid is.
thecomposer1962 2 years ago
Imho, I think you should give the Watchmen movie a second chance. I'm a big fan of the comic, and I don't think a better version could realistically be done.
Moloch was in it, played by Matt Frewer/Max Headroom.
Of course things had to be cut for a movie version. A mini-series, 3 part movie would have been great, but was not financially feasible.
I have a few nitpicks of course, but I thought it was wonderful.
StevenErnest 2 years ago
We are creative beings, its our nature! Religion takes this away, thus most mainstream religions are not natural.
TheBiggestWolf 3 years ago
well no religion is really natural, its man made thus cannot be natural.
AnarchistCommunity 3 years ago
There is no such thing as an "unnatural" act. The whole natural/supernatural divide is also daffy.
KosmicCitizen 3 years ago 3
Religion is nothing more of an outward projection of the human dualistic mind and the ego's attempt to disect the self and understand it while prisoned in our unenlightened state of being. The kingdom is within. Peace.
JSBlanch77 3 years ago
Religion is mostly a set of practices where people get together and compare clothes.
ilovethepighat 2 years ago
thanks george carlin!
timetochilli 1 year ago
Are man not of nature?
RossKilgariff 2 years ago 2
Not if you are a christian.
WearWolfeAssassin 2 years ago
HE LOOKS LIKE ROB ZOMBIE
1640george 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Eat shite and die
Michael1984360 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Celtic 4 Hamilton Accies 0
I hate Hamilton Accies (rhyming slang)
Michael1984360 3 years ago
WTF is that to do with anything, away an take a fuck tae yersel
Eldritchard 3 years ago
Don't use my football team in the same line as your racism you scum.
MrWednesday101 3 years ago
i some times go to a place in wales they call it the farm but its not a farm in the sense of animals running around every where its a kind of retreat for hippys,he owns the land and property there,i would go there to see friends who live on the farm and would pick magic mushrooms from the hills that surround the place.he also lives just up the road from me.
brainshiver81 3 years ago
I really admire Mr Moore's work. Does anyone on here know him personally?
wordforge 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the bible says magic is not good. to not listen to astrolgy, or alchemy..because whatever is created ...not in the truth is a lie.
mayreal13 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
shut up and go read the bible.
RnFR4L 3 years ago
booooring.
why are you even here?
elioraceit 3 years ago
Respect others opinions, I read the Bible and I do magic. I don't buy anything from the Christian, just another solar cult in my opinion. Watch Zeitgeist my friend
Marinkorpse 3 years ago
Zeitgeist is bullshit, watching it is really just a waste of time.
FuttBucker667 3 years ago
The bible reads like a book of magic. If your God wanted us to obey certain guidelines, it would read like a law book. So loosen up.
What Bible do you want him to read anyway? There are variations. "the" doesn't point him in any particular direction.
riotone38 3 years ago
I can imagine that he is. Just by watching his interviews, he comes across very positively to me.
KazuoKiriyama666 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
no substance... utter gibberish
rufeelinme1234 3 years ago
plenty substance to those who can think outside the box. gibberish to the unitiated maybe, but not likey..........
Eldritchard 3 years ago
I wish he was my grandpa
captainjackie 3 years ago 4
Apparently he's a real sweetheart in person.
wookie72 3 years ago 3
yeah. he's probably really cool.
comicbookspotlight 3 years ago 2
I love Alan Moore!
Taors 3 years ago 2
Magic is simply what you choose to make of it;
'in the space of the mind is the place of no fear'.
Khenghis 3 years ago 3
I think that Alan Moore is explain a very complex spiritual idea about the Word becoming reality in a vry simplistic fashion. This ties fully in with qabalistic thought.
guygaunt 3 years ago 3
Alan Moore turned me on to mysticism with the long interview in Arthur magazine in 2003, "Magic Is Afoot."
Thanks for uploading this!!! ^_^
StevenErnest 4 years ago 4
magic ;-)
darkviewman 4 years ago 2
Have you noticed a lot of magic influenced writers in comics? Alan Moore, Neil Gaiman, Grant Morrison, etc. Any thoughts on why this might be?
yoyoinfl 4 years ago
I think it's most likely because they are all from Great Britain (Morrison is from Scotland, the other two are from England). In Great Britain, fantasy literature and comic books are much more tied up with faerie stories than they are in North America. Plus, Gaiman and Moore know each other personally.
wookie72 4 years ago
Don't forget about Warren Ellis. Moore and Ellis are good friends too.
KazuoKiriyama666 3 years ago
Didn't know that, but I'm not surprised. Of course, some would argue that they're all barking mad.
wookie72 3 years ago
Not that there's anything wrong with being barking mad, of course.
wookie72 3 years ago
He sounds a heck of a lot like Steve Coogan as Tommy Saxondale, and I checked on wiki and both Moore and the Saxondale character are from the East Midlands... wild!
wookie72 4 years ago
Man, this guy speaks to me.
drunkdonutboy 4 years ago
He's a great writer! As far as the magic stuff goes, he's just repeating the same ideas, but it's very cool he's doing it on such a massive scale and is not afraid to look "ignorant" to the ignorant. All anyone has to do is TRY magic, to see that it works. A Qabalistic pathworking, for instance. The fact that it is REAL is why people don't care if they're disbelieved. The smartest men have always been into magic.
forwardmarch 4 years ago 4
Alan Moore is a True Master Storyteller.
Watchmen, V of Vendetta, Swamp Thing, The Killing Joke..
The True Founder of Mature Reading Comics..
Al Moore is a Living Legend!
CHARROMISTERIO 4 years ago 2
If some one can call Alan Moore and Idiot, then he should fill the rest of in on how the world really works.
Vampirith 4 years ago 2
No, he's not.
Alan Moore is experimenting with different lenses of perception. He is an obvious polymath, a creative juggernaut, and you are an unimaginative fool.
psnapplebee 4 years ago 3
the man is a genius
billycarr 4 years ago
Probably the most talent writer working in any media today.
theheathyfella 4 years ago
This man is not an idiot...I think the word you're looking for is 'amazing' as he is one, if not the greatist comic writers of his generation and probably has more spectaculer thoughts every few minutes than some people have in a whole lifetime.
DarkAlewhiskers 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
how can such a talented person be so ignorant... my heart aches...
apocalogy1 5 years ago
probably angina
a4u7g1e 5 years ago
Alan Moore is not ignorant. Have you read his interviews? You are a fool. Please educate yourself further.
psnapplebee 4 years ago
I may disagree with him at some points, but one thing he is NOT is an idiot.
danielamin 5 years ago