@narutofan9tf but if ur future self stopped you than there would have been no reason for you to go back in time to stop urself from breaking the vase which would mean that ur future self wouldn't have gone back in time to stop you..so u would have broken the vase...it's probably an endless cycle >.>
yeah I know, it was things like this that kept me up at night it's crazy. So you can never change the past because it would have already been changed... crazy stuff there
@Blade025 thats some crazy shit, but i might have an explanation for that. Youre about to break a vase because i guess you feel like it. your future self comes out of nowhere "aye bitch dont do that shit ur gonna get me i mean us in trouble" so you dont. then he goes back into the future and all of these paradoxs start to take place. in the next 20 or so years, you start to look back into the past. Played baseball, jerked off, but you didnt break that vase. you dont need to go back into the past
you have to travel faster than the speed of light i heard for one. then find some kind of portal.. like a macroverse or a megaverse. something thats gonna open up without will. i dont think its possible.
time is an astonomicaly based concept that is very unlikely to travel. unless of course we could find a way to move all the planets in reverse thier original oribit pattern which we bareley understand....
there is one thing that i'm wondering about if you could travel back in time does it mean that "past" runs parallel to "present" like a parallel universe? and that events in the past keep happening over and over again ? it's just something I can't wrap my head around.
@DonBlackStar i think so, it could make someone go crazy seriously, its like if you go back in time and kill your grandfather you will still exist because its a parallel universe
@ThomasVoMusic and it's not just any human voice: it's Benedict Cumberbatch, who also played a young Stephen Hawking in a TV docudrama a few years ago.
time isn't real it is a perception of space. your life expectancy is a perception of time, which doesn't exist..It is simply a measurement from one point to another.its like saying you are one yard old. Do you understand?
I have been saying for years, that all the UFOs people are seeing is actually humans from the future. I have never herd a scientist or ufologist say this. Am I the only one to think like this, because it makes a lot sense right?
Time travel is impossible, because it breaks certain laws, like two existences in one plane, and if it is possible, why hasnt anyone from the future visited us all this while...
@radicalteh You're getting confused with popular sci-fi.
If you watch the whole documentary you're see how time is not consistent throughout the whole of space. It's not being in two places at once. It's not INSTANT time travel, it still takes TIME to travel through TIME.
It's about being in one place where time moves slower than the other, and when you move out of the slow-time-moving place, you are now theoretically in the future, as more time has passed in that place than in your place.
@DrShakesBALLIN u lucky SOB, Im all dry but this shit seems too f-ing interesting to be delayed until i reload my stashbox! guess i just have 2 see it 2 times lol B-) nice input btw
if at the beginning there was no space outside the big bang ball then which space did the big bang ball expand into after the big bang....an explosion needs extra space.
I WILL BELIEVE IN THE CONCEPT OF TIME WARPS AND WRINKLES ONLY IF SOME ONE CAN PROVE TO ME THAT TIME IS ANYTHING LIKE MATTER...BECAUSE WARPS AND WRINKLES ARE THE PROPERTIES OF MATTER.
I'd also like to point out that I bet if we found life on another earth like planet that went around the sun every 30 days, and if day light was 4 hours and night was 4 hours, they would sleep for 2 hours and be awake for 6 hours. also living a shorter time period then us. The existance of life depends on the night/days and rotation around the sun
Also I'd like to point out. I do not live longer when I go 100MPG in a car for long trips. No matter how fast you go, you are always in this time period. Light goes the speed of light, if it time traveled we would not see light. All speed is, is how long it takes to go from Point A to Point B. Living longer is just silly. Fact is when you go faster, it is harder to raise your hand, so that why particles last a tish longer.
I did finish watching the documentary, and no where what I say says he is wrong nor right. There is just certain points that bother me about the faster you go, the longer you live. Ever thought it wo uld cause you to die sooner? But the man could be correct as well. But I was nice enough to back up what I was saying with facts.
I disagree time moves different depending where your at.
That statement is not true, as for a watch, it is all about the magnetic backround as one spot is different from another spot that causes a clock to move differently.
Let say time moved faster in one space then another. You would vanish in front of my eyes and I would never see you again until you found a spot where time moved slower then the time I'm in. So... Hawkings theory isn't true
sorry man, the gps system would still work if time doesnt exist. you got to remmember none of it is proven, only evidence to support it. and evidence is not proof.
@BillMan2002It is proven that time slows down the faster you move.In1975 Professor Carol Allie(University of Maryland)tested Einstein’s theory using two synchronized atomic clocks.Oneclock was loaded on a plane and flown for several hours,while the other clock remained on theground at the airbase.Upon return,the clock on board the plane wasfound to be ever so slightly slower that the one on theground.Thiswas not due to experimental error,and has been repeated numerous times with the same result.
yeah, he's always talking about how he wants to return to his youth, so maybe she reminds him of the good ole days. I also think he wants other people to think he's more human, instead of just a thinking machine in a chair.
can we forget the music in background and all other marketing shit such as stupid animations and others? The less manipulation ("ornament") is the better. For all of us.
big bang is just a theory not the truth, all of this is just theory not fact, because he dont' believe in God, science discovered that the world is circle and not flat, but 2700 years ago it was already written in the bible that the earth is circle.
Isaiah 40: 21-22 It is He who sits above the circle Of the Earth
Also read the book of Job, he tell us that the earth isn't supported with anything but it is HUNG upon NOTHING. science discovered this just lately but the bible speaks the truth
So you are saying that the theory of relativity and other equations are wrong; however, this equations are used on computers and electronics, while the theory of relativity shows us about light time and gravity; however, you are saying that they are partially wrong because of a book written by man. >_> Yeah, I prefer to listen to science rather than bullshit.
@jovenamago Science says the earth is spherical, not "circle", so it doesn't matter if the bible said "circle" first, because a circle is different from a sphere, and a circle can be flat as well.
Time Travelling is the greatest mysteries this world can know. Who knows, one time in the future we will travel through time itself and then learn more of our ancient ancestors and maybe even our decendants.
Even they are successful in implementing time travel, the human race will still be 5 - 10 minutes late, with long commutes, and a dependency on the new technology which eventually become a necessity. And don't forget rush hour and missing the wurm hole subway.
don't see the future time travelers is we are first inline need to inventa travel plan in order to put things in order someone has to invent, discover, once that has been done, a gesture to change can take place unless it is a universal law what could take place we could have a break on through to the other side, from a free mind full of creative energies flowing non-stop, to grasp the ideas as they filter through memory intact to remember the steps as they come so fast. S. Hawking is our man.
I'm not being negative but think this: if we have successfully built a time machine in the far far far future, wouldn't it be possible that people in the future travel back to our time? However, we don't see them at all! So, maybe we couldn't build the machine after all ! On the other hand, they're probably hiding somewhere in our world, observing their ancestors (us) :P
One view is that time is part of the fundamental structure of the universe, a dimension in which events occur in sequence. Sir I Newton subscribed to this realist view, and hence it is sometimes referred to as Newtonian time. Time travel, in this view, becomes a possibility as other "times" persist like frames of a film strip, spread out across the time line.
@arnofourie The opposing view is that time does not refer to any kind of "container" that events and objects "move through", nor to any entity that "flows", but that it is instead part of a fundamental intellectual structure (together with space and number) within which humans sequence and compare events. This second view, in the tradition of Gottfried Leibniz and I Kant, holds that time is neither an event nor a thing, and thus is not itself measurable nor can it be travelled.
i really loved watching this - what i loved also was the music used in this series especially the end credits music - can any of u guys give me some sort of link where i can download or at least listen to the music used in this series ? - Thanks in advance....
To ANYONE who is religious to Einstein's 'theory of relativity' google 'The First Test That Proves General Theory of Relativity Wrong' and click the first link.
I prefer not to use the word "wrong". "Wrong" sounds so absolute, so total. I think you will agree that Einstein's theory is not completely "wrong". His theory, similar to other true scientific theories, I would agree is incomplete, partial, tentative, etc. But if you insist that it is completely "wrong", then I guess you must discard many, if not all, scientific theories. In that case, don't cross a bridge, don't get on a plane, and stop going on the internet!
@yr1ntrly I do of course not mean completely wrong, stop going on about that. You have the intelligence to know what i mean.. stop diving around the fact that small parts of the theories behind this can be wrong.. Meaning the basis of time travel is a theory, based on a theory (as the theory of relativity is not a fact) - (Think about it)
"Think about it" -- you need to come up with a new line. Anyhow, maybe it is you who needs to "think" about things. I never suggested that relativity as a theory is a fact. And so for you to point that out is not only irrelevant but grossly misleading. Misleading because a scientific theory by itself is not *a fact*, but rather an intellectual framework that seeks to explain, relate, and, if possible, unify *a body of facts*.
Furthermore, especially with regard to physics, there are two sides to the concept of a theory -- the physical side and the mathematical side. Broadly speaking, the former is what we know (through observations, measurements, tests, etc); and the latter is what we deduce from what we know (often based on interpretation of mathematical consequences, as well as experimental findings). Our interpretations, of course, can lead us astray; but they can also reveal to us *facts* we did know before.
Take, for examples, the ideas of the ether and black holes: both originated from our interpretations of the mathematics, though we originally had no experimental confirmation of either. Of course, as we now know (some may say "believe"), the idea of the ether was just that: an idea. Whereas, black holes are now *facts* about the physical universe we did not know before and now must accept. My point: there is nothing "wrong" with a theory being based on a theory.
So for you to discard the idea of time travel because it is based on a "theory" (and not a "fact") is not very compelling. In the end, whatever our interpretations, our conjectures, our theories, even our beliefs, we must confirm them with experiments. Thus, I guess, with regard to time travel, only time can tell (pun intended) :-).
It astonishes me that you regard my reply as not having to do with what you said. You said: "Meaning the basis of time travel is a theory, based on a theory (as the theory of relativity is not a fact) - (Think about it)". This implies that you consider basing a theory on another theory is wrong, if not weak. And you went on further, backing your claim up with the asinine statement that a theory is not a fact. I addressed both contention in my reply directly and with historical examples.
Anyhow, the frailty of your response shows me you are utterly an intellectual lightweight. I would go as far as calling you a charlatan. Stop pretending to speak about matters you have no idea about. With that said, this will be my last response to you. I am going instead to have some fun with religious morons who do not accept the theory of evolution because, well, among many reasons, according to them it is "just a theory and not a fact" -- hey, that sounds familiar :-). Good day!
@yr1ntrly Your attempts to belittle me, i find quite funny. History does not have anything to do with this theory, it has no impact on whether this theory is correct or not. The fact is, this time travel theory is flawed on many fronts, which you may argue with me (better than confusing me with your extended babbles about something not related to the topic)
So a better question. How does gravity effect time, if it is not a physical thing? - Or a dimension for that matter.
@yr1ntrly Also the fact that you are abandoning this discussion to go 'have some fun with religious morons' Indicates that you are nothing but an insolent internet troll. Please have a decent discussion, cut the childish comments and let's have a decent discussion.
Another example: the Information Paradox. In the end Susskind showed Hawking was wrong. But he did not do so by some rhetorical acrobatics like "a theory based on a theory" argument against it. Instead, through years of thinking, which culminated in his publishing a painstakingly detailed physics journal, he was able to show Hawking's mistake. And Hawking, for his part, was humble enough to admit he was wrong. My point: you're not a lone rebel fighting the good fight; stop deluding yourself!
@yr1ntrly Just why the hell would i spend years writing a journal to show you that he is wrong?! I do not understand why you want so much information from me!! IF you are interested and not bias, you would look for yourself. I'm not going to do it for you.
Also, I read the article you suggested, and I do not see anything damning, other than the provocative title, that says Einstein's theory is "wrong" (in the complete sense, of course). As a matter of fact, the finding maybe suggests an "empiric clue for how to merge together quantum mechanics and general theory of relativity in a single unified theory". What?! I thought Einstein's theory is "wrong" (again, in the complete sense, of course)??!! Hey, two wrongs may after all make a right!!!
Right there at the last few seconds, looks like a rip off of Stargate almost. Although I don't blame the producers as it is a great example/way to put the image in our minds.
@JRM515 and for a few seconds at 00:39 it looks like something from Bill and Ted...problem with something of this nature is its hard to make something truely original that is still obvious with what you are trying to show.
@JRM515 and for a few seconds at 39 it looks like something from Bill and Ted...problem with something of this nature is its hard to make something truely original that is still obvious with what you are trying to show.
How can you suggest that there are 'spaces and wrinkles' in time?! Time is not a physical thing, this makes no sense! I watched this video with optimism, but this is a bit of a broad guess.
@stephengriifith time may not be physical but it is a dimention and we can squish stuff to make it shorter or longer so maybe in the future we can squish or stretch time. Also gravity controls time. inside a black hole time stops. you cant see anything pass over the event horizon (edge of hole) cause the gravity stops time and the object's clock is going infinatly slower than urs so time travel is possible.
@personmaddude Time is not influenced by gravity, you have contradicted yourself!! How can something which is not PHYSICAL be affected by ANYTHING?! And claiming that time stops in a black hole?! Okay this is just silly, i mean good try but you are making little sense.
@stephengriifith Everything is constantly moving through time. So, it might be possible for something with a huge amount of gravity to slow down the travel through time, as it is possible to (pretty much) stop travel in the first 3 dimensions.
@yerfdog1935 On what basis are you making this suggestion on? Time is not a physical thing. And can't be affected by any force such as gravity. This whole time travel is based on looking at time as a fourth dimension. Which is incorrect, and many scientists would agree that time is not to be seen as a dimension. So, sorry.
@stephengriifith You speak as if you knew time wasn't a physical thing... and yet i can't imagine how any physicist can reject Einsteins 4 dimensional spacetime. We have observed the effect gravity has on time with atomic clocks on GPS satellites.. time beats slower on the satellites by 45 microseconds per day due to the speed at which they're traveling, and their distance from the earths surface. This is undeniable proof that the mass of something, does effect the speed at which time beats.
@Informinum incorrect. We have observed that gravity affects the movement of the clock, not time itself. Like i said, it is not physical, and you and Stephen Hawkins alike, have made false judgment. Think about it.
@stephengriifith I was meant to say faster not slower on my previous comment.. but anyway.. are you suggesting that gravity slows the mechanical function of the clocks on earth down somehow? if so.. how? please explain your theory.. and remember to not include time.
Anyhow, I am just playing with you. Just that I find it somewhat comical when anyone who can type goes on the internet saying "this" and "that". I have to wonder have you publish any thing? Written any thing? Go do some thing about what you see as being "wrong"? Oh, you know, similar to a 26-year-old patent clerk once did!
we have many different dimensions, so us also has many duplications with different fates but same persons...
lemra12345 1 year ago
I wanna live in the renaissance time so bad or in the time of altair from assassins creed
failmeister51 1 year ago
just like event horizon.
rustynuts88 1 year ago
too bad the poor guy is crippled
tonitonytone2009 1 year ago
check.it.out!
Blade025 1 year ago
If steven hawking went back to his youth....he'd probably have a couple of beers right off the bat.
MisterWho0 1 year ago
Stephen Hawkings RULZZZZZZ!!!! :)
Iwantlemonjuice 1 year ago 2
If I broke a vase in the present and went to the past to stop me, wouldn't my future self have done that already???
narutofan9tf 1 year ago
@narutofan9tf but if ur future self stopped you than there would have been no reason for you to go back in time to stop urself from breaking the vase which would mean that ur future self wouldn't have gone back in time to stop you..so u would have broken the vase...it's probably an endless cycle >.>
Blade025 1 year ago
@Blade025
yeah I know, it was things like this that kept me up at night it's crazy. So you can never change the past because it would have already been changed... crazy stuff there
narutofan9tf 1 year ago
@Blade025 thats some crazy shit, but i might have an explanation for that. Youre about to break a vase because i guess you feel like it. your future self comes out of nowhere "aye bitch dont do that shit ur gonna get me i mean us in trouble" so you dont. then he goes back into the future and all of these paradoxs start to take place. in the next 20 or so years, you start to look back into the past. Played baseball, jerked off, but you didnt break that vase. you dont need to go back into the past
asianbeverage 1 year ago
Telephon Booth. Bill and Ted. Nuff Said.
hivelocity100 1 year ago
you have to travel faster than the speed of light i heard for one. then find some kind of portal.. like a macroverse or a megaverse. something thats gonna open up without will. i dont think its possible.
ATR108 1 year ago
time is an astonomicaly based concept that is very unlikely to travel. unless of course we could find a way to move all the planets in reverse thier original oribit pattern which we bareley understand....
TheVentilla 1 year ago
there is one thing that i'm wondering about if you could travel back in time does it mean that "past" runs parallel to "present" like a parallel universe? and that events in the past keep happening over and over again ? it's just something I can't wrap my head around.
DonBlackStar 1 year ago
@DonBlackStar i think so, it could make someone go crazy seriously, its like if you go back in time and kill your grandfather you will still exist because its a parallel universe
thistheworldwelivein 1 year ago
I wonder if you can get the soundtrack to this somewhere.
zookydragon 1 year ago
this is my 3rd time watching this :D
Jeeyo12345 1 year ago
@Jeeyo12345 Same here!
zookydragon 1 year ago
steaphan hawkings is my idol
shano388 1 year ago
i like the R8.
Corerrai 1 year ago
Wow, my head exploded.
Just got mentally headshotted.
mariotaz 1 year ago
haha. using Darth Vaders breathing sound on the time traveler.
Mormodes 1 year ago 3
Wow, finally a high quality upload! Thanks!
gvcsmnfhjk 1 year ago 2
Stephen Hawking is a highly admirable man. I admire him greatly. The way he thinks fascinates me and i watch all his programs religiously.
cogradyy 1 year ago
Lol, The Human timelords would be great..
chromasaur 1 year ago
Comment removed
ThomasVoMusic 1 year ago
@ThomasVoMusic and it's not just any human voice: it's Benedict Cumberbatch, who also played a young Stephen Hawking in a TV docudrama a few years ago.
zionravescene 1 year ago
@zionravescene Oh my! That's very fastinating. Thanks for the info ^__^
Nonetheless, this program was very captivating :)
ThomasVoMusic 1 year ago
I love the intro when the voice changed from a computer to a human voice! It's epic!
ThomasVoMusic 1 year ago
time isn't real it is a perception of space. your life expectancy is a perception of time, which doesn't exist..It is simply a measurement from one point to another.its like saying you are one yard old. Do you understand?
kreno11234 1 year ago
time isn't real it is a perception of space.
kreno11234 1 year ago
I have been saying for years, that all the UFOs people are seeing is actually humans from the future. I have never herd a scientist or ufologist say this. Am I the only one to think like this, because it makes a lot sense right?
MICNOLE 1 year ago
@telescoop hahah that would be a good way to spook someone out by changing their calenders and shit lol
xyouralivex 1 year ago
@billman2002
Atomic clocks are required because of their accuracy. And they're more fun than a couple of casio wrist watches.
Time slows down the faster matter travels.
Fact.
thedogsballs1 1 year ago
@telescoop aangekomen?
yonazzz 1 year ago
Who is going to be his legacy?
VenndettaX 1 year ago
this one shows the futility of human knowledge and powers
Enrique15021988 1 year ago
this is why i became a nerd
kingslave021 1 year ago
@kingslave021 Same.
Grog85 1 year ago
@Grog85 yay a fellow nerd
kingslave021 1 year ago
Lol 5:30 sounds like Darth Vader
RagingAudioslave 1 year ago
Whoa. this shit is like, really, really, really, trippy...
Severe777 1 year ago
Comment removed
Severe777 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Check. It. Out.
SkipperDaley 1 year ago
Does anyone know what channel the above come on
12majio 1 year ago
@12majio Channel 4 saturday nights
UBSWRecords 1 year ago
what channel does this come on?
12majio 1 year ago
Time travel is impossible, because it breaks certain laws, like two existences in one plane, and if it is possible, why hasnt anyone from the future visited us all this while...
radicalteh 1 year ago
@radicalteh You're getting confused with popular sci-fi.
If you watch the whole documentary you're see how time is not consistent throughout the whole of space. It's not being in two places at once. It's not INSTANT time travel, it still takes TIME to travel through TIME.
It's about being in one place where time moves slower than the other, and when you move out of the slow-time-moving place, you are now theoretically in the future, as more time has passed in that place than in your place.
llTomlll 1 year ago
1:49
Wow, Stephen, Its good too see that not even Motor Neuron Disease can stop your labido : )
Fascinating series though
JONNOG88 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Stephen HoaxKing
lionofgod57 1 year ago
Stephen HoaxKing
lionofgod57 1 year ago
Wonderful...and complete. Thanks for sharing with us!!
plentyzero 1 year ago
I watched the whole program stoned last night. This stuff is too interesting.
DrShakesBALLIN 1 year ago 46
@DrShakesBALLIN u lucky SOB, Im all dry but this shit seems too f-ing interesting to be delayed until i reload my stashbox! guess i just have 2 see it 2 times lol B-) nice input btw
nicedreams21 1 year ago
@DrShakesBALLIN and I just loaded my bong!
hit it up mate!
Rahavin1 1 year ago
@DrShakesBALLIN im watchin it stoned now,hmmmm
FGISweetPeas 1 year ago
as im a atheist i would definitely go meet jesus because im sure he was just a preacher man
SuperYellow1989 1 year ago
@SuperYellow1989 what if the real guy was someone else who just used Jesus? Who just said he could do miracles :D. Brainwashing :D.
gpolenik 1 year ago
@gpolenik i dnt get what u mean?
SuperYellow1989 1 year ago
For most the people in this conversation. Remember one thing: He would beat you at a quiz, but you could beat him in.
ultimatebw2008 1 year ago
if at the beginning there was no space outside the big bang ball then which space did the big bang ball expand into after the big bang....an explosion needs extra space.
dastan313 1 year ago
WHERE DID YOU GET THIS ?!?!?!?!
Please answear :)
MattGroening100 1 year ago
I WILL BELIEVE IN THE CONCEPT OF TIME WARPS AND WRINKLES ONLY IF SOME ONE CAN PROVE TO ME THAT TIME IS ANYTHING LIKE MATTER...BECAUSE WARPS AND WRINKLES ARE THE PROPERTIES OF MATTER.
dastan313 1 year ago
@dastan313 it's really hard to believe at the begining. Read one of his books and you'll see how he thinks.
gpolenik 1 year ago
one of the biggest minds in the history of our planet.
gpolenik 1 year ago
@gpolenik if only more humans would think like him.
tomy101ish 1 year ago
HES A CHRONOGAURD!!!
turtlehead12699 1 year ago
HES A CHRONOGAURD!!!
turtlehead12699 1 year ago
"Check..It.. OUT."
MasochisticTeddyBear 1 year ago 2
of course time travel is possible, just go to jb hi-fi and pick up a flux capacitor. no big deal
dirtbikerider123456 1 year ago
Good info. Thanks.
hellmage09 1 year ago
love seohen hawkings
rosalio3211 1 year ago
anyone know what the intro music is? it sounds great
firedudejklef 1 year ago
@firedudejklef I think it's "Into the Universe Main Title" by Sheridan Tongue.
mike213465 1 year ago
@mike213465 k cool
firedudejklef 1 year ago
I'd also like to point out that I bet if we found life on another earth like planet that went around the sun every 30 days, and if day light was 4 hours and night was 4 hours, they would sleep for 2 hours and be awake for 6 hours. also living a shorter time period then us. The existance of life depends on the night/days and rotation around the sun
BillMan2002 1 year ago
@BillMan2002
Just because a planets rotation takes more/less than earth doesn't mean it's possible inhabitants sleep more/less than we do.
A planets rotations really has nothing to do with a organisms sleeping patterns, Natural predators are what affect sleeping patterns.
gibhran11 1 year ago
Also I'd like to point out. I do not live longer when I go 100MPG in a car for long trips. No matter how fast you go, you are always in this time period. Light goes the speed of light, if it time traveled we would not see light. All speed is, is how long it takes to go from Point A to Point B. Living longer is just silly. Fact is when you go faster, it is harder to raise your hand, so that why particles last a tish longer.
BillMan2002 1 year ago
@BillMan2002 LOL. You really are an idiot.
Finish watching the documentary before going around acting like you have a Ph.D in Quantum Physics and criticising this great man's life work.
llTomlll 1 year ago
@llTomlll
I did finish watching the documentary, and no where what I say says he is wrong nor right. There is just certain points that bother me about the faster you go, the longer you live. Ever thought it wo uld cause you to die sooner? But the man could be correct as well. But I was nice enough to back up what I was saying with facts.
BillMan2002 1 year ago
I disagree time moves different depending where your at.
That statement is not true, as for a watch, it is all about the magnetic backround as one spot is different from another spot that causes a clock to move differently.
Let say time moved faster in one space then another. You would vanish in front of my eyes and I would never see you again until you found a spot where time moved slower then the time I'm in. So... Hawkings theory isn't true
BillMan2002 1 year ago
@BillMan2002 So... You should really re-evaluate your understanding of fundamental physics. Space-time sound familiar?
If this was false, the GPS-system would not work.
Dumass88 1 year ago
@Dumass88
sorry man, the gps system would still work if time doesnt exist. you got to remmember none of it is proven, only evidence to support it. and evidence is not proof.
BillMan2002 1 year ago
@BillMan2002 Well, I urge you too study a bit more on the subject.
Dumass88 1 year ago
@BillMan2002
I would like to say, why does it have to be an Atomic clock for this expirement to work?
Really, any clock should work, and it does not..... So that raises questions to my concern.
BillMan2002 1 year ago
@Dumass88
May I ask what the understanding is? And isn't it a good thing in the world to think different?
BillMan2002 1 year ago
@Dumass88
Also, with what proof behind it is the understanding?
BillMan2002 1 year ago
@BillMan2002It is proven that time slows down the faster you move.In1975 Professor Carol Allie(University of Maryland)tested Einstein’s theory using two synchronized atomic clocks.Oneclock was loaded on a plane and flown for several hours,while the other clock remained on theground at the airbase.Upon return,the clock on board the plane wasfound to be ever so slightly slower that the one on theground.Thiswas not due to experimental error,and has been repeated numerous times with the same result.
666TheMetalmaniac666 1 year ago
and i am free....
free in my mind
BAAAAMMMMMMMMM
Shut0w3n 1 year ago
why is he so obsessed with marilyn monroe?
Aphex217Twin 1 year ago
@Aphex217Twin maybe because shes was "the" hot chick when he was young?
apriswajaya 1 year ago
yeah, he's always talking about how he wants to return to his youth, so maybe she reminds him of the good ole days. I also think he wants other people to think he's more human, instead of just a thinking machine in a chair.
Aphex217Twin 1 year ago 23
@Aphex217Twin Stephen Hawking would tell somebody's ass UP in an arguement.
Severe777 1 year ago
can we forget the music in background and all other marketing shit such as stupid animations and others? The less manipulation ("ornament") is the better. For all of us.
ymelfilm 1 year ago
big bang is just a theory not the truth, all of this is just theory not fact, because he dont' believe in God, science discovered that the world is circle and not flat, but 2700 years ago it was already written in the bible that the earth is circle.
Isaiah 40: 21-22 It is He who sits above the circle Of the Earth
Also read the book of Job, he tell us that the earth isn't supported with anything but it is HUNG upon NOTHING. science discovered this just lately but the bible speaks the truth
jovenamago 1 year ago
@jovenamago The bible also says that jesus was resurrected :| Not everything you read is true.
thomasharman14 1 year ago
@jovenamago
So you are saying that the theory of relativity and other equations are wrong; however, this equations are used on computers and electronics, while the theory of relativity shows us about light time and gravity; however, you are saying that they are partially wrong because of a book written by man. >_> Yeah, I prefer to listen to science rather than bullshit.
SciNonymous10 1 year ago
@jovenamago Science says the earth is spherical, not "circle", so it doesn't matter if the bible said "circle" first, because a circle is different from a sphere, and a circle can be flat as well.
hellowjp 1 year ago
I think that we may be able to travel forward in time at some point however i do not believe we would be able to successfully be able to travel back.
vjohnso1 1 year ago
the Event Horizon created its own worm hole, and we know what happened on-board that ship.
Liberate Tutemae Ex Inferis (save yourself from hell)
FFFSilencer 1 year ago
Time Travelling is the greatest mysteries this world can know. Who knows, one time in the future we will travel through time itself and then learn more of our ancient ancestors and maybe even our decendants.
TheThing2008 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hey wers d url of video
MrPratikpro 1 year ago
Even they are successful in implementing time travel, the human race will still be 5 - 10 minutes late, with long commutes, and a dependency on the new technology which eventually become a necessity. And don't forget rush hour and missing the wurm hole subway.
bill76169 1 year ago
@bill76169 hey wers d url of d videos
MrPratikpro 1 year ago
2 people missed the like button
ClythiaMystica 1 year ago
can I get the link from where I can download all series of it plz....
sumant2290 1 year ago
don't see the future time travelers is we are first inline need to inventa travel plan in order to put things in order someone has to invent, discover, once that has been done, a gesture to change can take place unless it is a universal law what could take place we could have a break on through to the other side, from a free mind full of creative energies flowing non-stop, to grasp the ideas as they filter through memory intact to remember the steps as they come so fast. S. Hawking is our man.
jimoer 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this must be the right way to teach science
by making it interesting and simple^_^
MrMOONGAZER 1 year ago
this must be the right way to tech science
by making it interesting^_^
MrMOONGAZER 1 year ago
his voice ownz, he's microsoft sam!!
hebbent 1 year ago
I'm not being negative but think this: if we have successfully built a time machine in the far far far future, wouldn't it be possible that people in the future travel back to our time? However, we don't see them at all! So, maybe we couldn't build the machine after all ! On the other hand, they're probably hiding somewhere in our world, observing their ancestors (us) :P
newdividethinh 1 year ago
@newdividethinh im watching you...!!!!
8phatkat8 1 year ago
@8phatkat8 so you're a future person? Nice to meet you xD
newdividethinh 1 year ago
It would be so cool to watch this on an imax screen.
CrazyC1456 1 year ago
:O This is on Youtube? I missed an episode and freaked out! XD
DarkirStudios 1 year ago
One view is that time is part of the fundamental structure of the universe, a dimension in which events occur in sequence. Sir I Newton subscribed to this realist view, and hence it is sometimes referred to as Newtonian time. Time travel, in this view, becomes a possibility as other "times" persist like frames of a film strip, spread out across the time line.
arnofourie 1 year ago
@arnofourie The opposing view is that time does not refer to any kind of "container" that events and objects "move through", nor to any entity that "flows", but that it is instead part of a fundamental intellectual structure (together with space and number) within which humans sequence and compare events. This second view, in the tradition of Gottfried Leibniz and I Kant, holds that time is neither an event nor a thing, and thus is not itself measurable nor can it be travelled.
arnofourie 1 year ago
epic. :)
doublabatteries 1 year ago
omg!!!!
fafnir2388 1 year ago
i really loved watching this - what i loved also was the music used in this series especially the end credits music - can any of u guys give me some sort of link where i can download or at least listen to the music used in this series ? - Thanks in advance....
nirajskywalker007 1 year ago
where is Sheldon cooper when you need him
Darkseeker109 1 year ago 29
@Darkseeker109 bazinga!
maazaraza 1 year ago
gr8 video ......... but Einstein said that time depends up on the velocity
sabareesh1000 1 year ago
THAT'S SO COOL
seanl692 1 year ago
IF I COULD TIME TRABEL I WOULD GO IN SERCH OF POTATO AND BRING BACK FUTUR POTATO
Kertgaferg 1 year ago
No! Don't bring them back to us! Bring them to Europe during the potato famine! :-).
yr1ntrly 1 year ago
@Kertgaferg lol
terracottaheavens 1 year ago
To ANYONE who is religious to Einstein's 'theory of relativity' google 'The First Test That Proves General Theory of Relativity Wrong' and click the first link.
stephengriifith 1 year ago
Hello S.G.,
I prefer not to use the word "wrong". "Wrong" sounds so absolute, so total. I think you will agree that Einstein's theory is not completely "wrong". His theory, similar to other true scientific theories, I would agree is incomplete, partial, tentative, etc. But if you insist that it is completely "wrong", then I guess you must discard many, if not all, scientific theories. In that case, don't cross a bridge, don't get on a plane, and stop going on the internet!
yr1ntrly 1 year ago
@yr1ntrly I do of course not mean completely wrong, stop going on about that. You have the intelligence to know what i mean.. stop diving around the fact that small parts of the theories behind this can be wrong.. Meaning the basis of time travel is a theory, based on a theory (as the theory of relativity is not a fact) - (Think about it)
stephengriifith 1 year ago
"Think about it" -- you need to come up with a new line. Anyhow, maybe it is you who needs to "think" about things. I never suggested that relativity as a theory is a fact. And so for you to point that out is not only irrelevant but grossly misleading. Misleading because a scientific theory by itself is not *a fact*, but rather an intellectual framework that seeks to explain, relate, and, if possible, unify *a body of facts*.
yr1ntrly 1 year ago
Furthermore, especially with regard to physics, there are two sides to the concept of a theory -- the physical side and the mathematical side. Broadly speaking, the former is what we know (through observations, measurements, tests, etc); and the latter is what we deduce from what we know (often based on interpretation of mathematical consequences, as well as experimental findings). Our interpretations, of course, can lead us astray; but they can also reveal to us *facts* we did know before.
yr1ntrly 1 year ago
Take, for examples, the ideas of the ether and black holes: both originated from our interpretations of the mathematics, though we originally had no experimental confirmation of either. Of course, as we now know (some may say "believe"), the idea of the ether was just that: an idea. Whereas, black holes are now *facts* about the physical universe we did not know before and now must accept. My point: there is nothing "wrong" with a theory being based on a theory.
yr1ntrly 1 year ago
So for you to discard the idea of time travel because it is based on a "theory" (and not a "fact") is not very compelling. In the end, whatever our interpretations, our conjectures, our theories, even our beliefs, we must confirm them with experiments. Thus, I guess, with regard to time travel, only time can tell (pun intended) :-).
yr1ntrly 1 year ago
@yr1ntrly You are making no sense.. What does this 1600 word reply have to do with what i said? =s
stephengriifith 1 year ago
It astonishes me that you regard my reply as not having to do with what you said. You said: "Meaning the basis of time travel is a theory, based on a theory (as the theory of relativity is not a fact) - (Think about it)". This implies that you consider basing a theory on another theory is wrong, if not weak. And you went on further, backing your claim up with the asinine statement that a theory is not a fact. I addressed both contention in my reply directly and with historical examples.
yr1ntrly 1 year ago
Anyhow, the frailty of your response shows me you are utterly an intellectual lightweight. I would go as far as calling you a charlatan. Stop pretending to speak about matters you have no idea about. With that said, this will be my last response to you. I am going instead to have some fun with religious morons who do not accept the theory of evolution because, well, among many reasons, according to them it is "just a theory and not a fact" -- hey, that sounds familiar :-). Good day!
yr1ntrly 1 year ago
@yr1ntrly Your attempts to belittle me, i find quite funny. History does not have anything to do with this theory, it has no impact on whether this theory is correct or not. The fact is, this time travel theory is flawed on many fronts, which you may argue with me (better than confusing me with your extended babbles about something not related to the topic)
So a better question. How does gravity effect time, if it is not a physical thing? - Or a dimension for that matter.
stephengriifith 1 year ago
@yr1ntrly Also the fact that you are abandoning this discussion to go 'have some fun with religious morons' Indicates that you are nothing but an insolent internet troll. Please have a decent discussion, cut the childish comments and let's have a decent discussion.
stephengriifith 1 year ago
Another example: the Information Paradox. In the end Susskind showed Hawking was wrong. But he did not do so by some rhetorical acrobatics like "a theory based on a theory" argument against it. Instead, through years of thinking, which culminated in his publishing a painstakingly detailed physics journal, he was able to show Hawking's mistake. And Hawking, for his part, was humble enough to admit he was wrong. My point: you're not a lone rebel fighting the good fight; stop deluding yourself!
yr1ntrly 1 year ago
@yr1ntrly Just why the hell would i spend years writing a journal to show you that he is wrong?! I do not understand why you want so much information from me!! IF you are interested and not bias, you would look for yourself. I'm not going to do it for you.
stephengriifith 1 year ago
Also, I read the article you suggested, and I do not see anything damning, other than the provocative title, that says Einstein's theory is "wrong" (in the complete sense, of course). As a matter of fact, the finding maybe suggests an "empiric clue for how to merge together quantum mechanics and general theory of relativity in a single unified theory". What?! I thought Einstein's theory is "wrong" (again, in the complete sense, of course)??!! Hey, two wrongs may after all make a right!!!
yr1ntrly 1 year ago
Time doesn't really exist as we humans like to think of it. We made it up. The universe just IS.
byteresistor 1 year ago
@RedRampage55 ROTFL
personmaddude 1 year ago
question : there are just 3 episodes of ''into the universe '' ? with stephen hawking ?thx
constantinvicol 1 year ago
@constantinvicol
correct
ipunk78 1 year ago
@ipunk78 i wished it was incorrect..;)
constantinvicol 1 year ago
Stephen Hawking is the 12th Doctor :)
qoaa 1 year ago
@qoaa what means the 12th doctor ?
constantinvicol 1 year ago
@constantinvicol doctor who :)
qoaa 1 year ago
Right there at the last few seconds, looks like a rip off of Stargate almost. Although I don't blame the producers as it is a great example/way to put the image in our minds.
JRM515 1 year ago
@JRM515 and for a few seconds at 00:39 it looks like something from Bill and Ted...problem with something of this nature is its hard to make something truely original that is still obvious with what you are trying to show.
CanthusOfCandE 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JRM515 and for a few seconds at 39 it looks like something from Bill and Ted...problem with something of this nature is its hard to make something truely original that is still obvious with what you are trying to show.
CanthusOfCandE 1 year ago
There's always the possibility that everything we know is wrong!
HawxKid 1 year ago
I dont get it!
darksideofthenation 1 year ago
Young visionary truly inspiring.... If you liked this check out "Kyle Nimmrichter - Time for Change"
cocowbaa 1 year ago
the 411 operator sounds more human than that old voice. does he not change his voice for recognizability?
Im am not trying to bash steven, Im just wondering.
defect530 1 year ago
@defect530 maybe it's his way of saying how little the way we sound matters compared to the way our minds work
dougsusername 1 year ago
How can you suggest that there are 'spaces and wrinkles' in time?! Time is not a physical thing, this makes no sense! I watched this video with optimism, but this is a bit of a broad guess.
stephengriifith 1 year ago
@stephengriifith time may not be physical but it is a dimention and we can squish stuff to make it shorter or longer so maybe in the future we can squish or stretch time. Also gravity controls time. inside a black hole time stops. you cant see anything pass over the event horizon (edge of hole) cause the gravity stops time and the object's clock is going infinatly slower than urs so time travel is possible.
personmaddude 1 year ago
@personmaddude Time is not influenced by gravity, you have contradicted yourself!! How can something which is not PHYSICAL be affected by ANYTHING?! And claiming that time stops in a black hole?! Okay this is just silly, i mean good try but you are making little sense.
stephengriifith 1 year ago
@stephengriifith Everything is constantly moving through time. So, it might be possible for something with a huge amount of gravity to slow down the travel through time, as it is possible to (pretty much) stop travel in the first 3 dimensions.
yerfdog1935 1 year ago
@yerfdog1935 On what basis are you making this suggestion on? Time is not a physical thing. And can't be affected by any force such as gravity. This whole time travel is based on looking at time as a fourth dimension. Which is incorrect, and many scientists would agree that time is not to be seen as a dimension. So, sorry.
stephengriifith 1 year ago
@stephengriifith You speak as if you knew time wasn't a physical thing... and yet i can't imagine how any physicist can reject Einsteins 4 dimensional spacetime. We have observed the effect gravity has on time with atomic clocks on GPS satellites.. time beats slower on the satellites by 45 microseconds per day due to the speed at which they're traveling, and their distance from the earths surface. This is undeniable proof that the mass of something, does effect the speed at which time beats.
Informinum 1 year ago
@Informinum incorrect. We have observed that gravity affects the movement of the clock, not time itself. Like i said, it is not physical, and you and Stephen Hawkins alike, have made false judgment. Think about it.
stephengriifith 1 year ago
@stephengriifith I was meant to say faster not slower on my previous comment.. but anyway.. are you suggesting that gravity slows the mechanical function of the clocks on earth down somehow? if so.. how? please explain your theory.. and remember to not include time.
Informinum 1 year ago
Anyhow, I am just playing with you. Just that I find it somewhat comical when anyone who can type goes on the internet saying "this" and "that". I have to wonder have you publish any thing? Written any thing? Go do some thing about what you see as being "wrong"? Oh, you know, similar to a 26-year-old patent clerk once did!
yr1ntrly 1 year ago
@stephengriifith and of couse your as well versed as the greatest scientific mind of our generation.
roxas12590 1 year ago