One of the main reasons you can't find a whole collapse video is because conspiracy theorists don't want people to know that most of the WTC's core was intact when the buildings came down. If you were to implode a building you would take it down by demolishing the core, that way it falls in on itself. Typical conspiracy theorists just kind of ignore that because it's inconvenient.
@maniac70 yes, and then the steel core columns vaporized like the rest of the building. There was no controlled demolition. A directed energy weapon was used.
@LuminosityEntangled What are you talking about? There are pictures of portions of the core intact after the building collapsed. There was no controlled demolition nor were any "Star Wars" weapons used. Quite simply a plane flew into each building, started massive fires, and those fires weakened the steel to the point of structural failure and ultimately collapse.
@maniac70 There is no way these 2 buildings collapsed just from the heat of the fire.. Even if thats true why the buildings collapsed at free-fall speed? You people are brainwashed and you dont know basic physics and gravity terms... You can't even explain the smoke came out from the bottom of the buildings before they collapse.. It's simple, explosives..
@TheLostree Free-fall speeds? Where do you get that from, according to many experts free-fall speed would have made the towers collapse in around nine seconds... Neither did. They were closer to about 13 seconds. Secondly it wasn't just fire that led to the collapse. I'm pretty sure that a 767 hit each building and blasted out large portions of the building. There were several reasons for smoke near the bottom of the buildings, burning vehicles near, and explosions that traveled down shafts.
@maniac70 Burning vehicles near? The smoke of burning fuel - vehicle is black!!! you can see white smoke clearly in the videos that TV gave to public.. WTC Building 7 collapsed at free fall speed, also as you said 13 seconds is very fast for a building with 100+ floors.. When the upper levels were damaged they should find some sort of resistance during the collapse as the lower levels were intact, that means that the lower levels are supposed to hold some sort of weight. Think about it dont rush
@TheLostree I didn't say fuel was burning, I said vehicles were burning. Another good smoke provider would be the burning debris that came down from the planes explosion. Thirteen seconds is NOT free fall speed, there are scientific papers which discuss that free fall speed would be nine, not 13. Are you one of those guys who thinks that each floor should have given some resistance. That's not true, the weight coming down on each floor increased. The heavier it is the less resistance.
@maniac70 Hi - The whole building doesn't have to fall at free-fall speed. NIST have admitted that WTC7 Did fall for about 18 floors at free-fall speed. Thus free-fall=demolition. 1300 Scientists as well as NIST can't be wrong, that my friend is impossible. If you watch Torontohearings at ustream TV you can see this evidence. (It was kept out of the media for a reason) Think about it.
why cant i find a video of the entire collapse. al these conspiracy videos cut away less than halfway through. that leads me to believe that the entire building didnt collapse to the very bottom,with several floors still intact
One of the main reasons you can't find a whole collapse video is because conspiracy theorists don't want people to know that most of the WTC's core was intact when the buildings came down. If you were to implode a building you would take it down by demolishing the core, that way it falls in on itself. Typical conspiracy theorists just kind of ignore that because it's inconvenient.
maniac70 7 months ago
@maniac70 yes, and then the steel core columns vaporized like the rest of the building. There was no controlled demolition. A directed energy weapon was used.
LuminosityEntangled 7 months ago
@LuminosityEntangled What are you talking about? There are pictures of portions of the core intact after the building collapsed. There was no controlled demolition nor were any "Star Wars" weapons used. Quite simply a plane flew into each building, started massive fires, and those fires weakened the steel to the point of structural failure and ultimately collapse.
maniac70 7 months ago
@maniac70 There is no way these 2 buildings collapsed just from the heat of the fire.. Even if thats true why the buildings collapsed at free-fall speed? You people are brainwashed and you dont know basic physics and gravity terms... You can't even explain the smoke came out from the bottom of the buildings before they collapse.. It's simple, explosives..
TheLostree 6 months ago
@TheLostree Free-fall speeds? Where do you get that from, according to many experts free-fall speed would have made the towers collapse in around nine seconds... Neither did. They were closer to about 13 seconds. Secondly it wasn't just fire that led to the collapse. I'm pretty sure that a 767 hit each building and blasted out large portions of the building. There were several reasons for smoke near the bottom of the buildings, burning vehicles near, and explosions that traveled down shafts.
maniac70 6 months ago
@maniac70 Burning vehicles near? The smoke of burning fuel - vehicle is black!!! you can see white smoke clearly in the videos that TV gave to public.. WTC Building 7 collapsed at free fall speed, also as you said 13 seconds is very fast for a building with 100+ floors.. When the upper levels were damaged they should find some sort of resistance during the collapse as the lower levels were intact, that means that the lower levels are supposed to hold some sort of weight. Think about it dont rush
TheLostree 6 months ago
@TheLostree I didn't say fuel was burning, I said vehicles were burning. Another good smoke provider would be the burning debris that came down from the planes explosion. Thirteen seconds is NOT free fall speed, there are scientific papers which discuss that free fall speed would be nine, not 13. Are you one of those guys who thinks that each floor should have given some resistance. That's not true, the weight coming down on each floor increased. The heavier it is the less resistance.
maniac70 6 months ago
@maniac70 Hi - The whole building doesn't have to fall at free-fall speed. NIST have admitted that WTC7 Did fall for about 18 floors at free-fall speed. Thus free-fall=demolition. 1300 Scientists as well as NIST can't be wrong, that my friend is impossible. If you watch Torontohearings at ustream TV you can see this evidence. (It was kept out of the media for a reason) Think about it.
PeaCe
exice 5 months ago
why cant i find a video of the entire collapse. al these conspiracy videos cut away less than halfway through. that leads me to believe that the entire building didnt collapse to the very bottom,with several floors still intact
szubanator 7 months ago