Added: 2 years ago
From: voteyesonquestion1
Views: 2,640
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (533)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • "Truly one of the BEST GIFTS you can give a child is the security and well-being that comes from having a father and a mother who love each other."

    When I read this all I could think is; "Yeah okay, or a father and a father, or a mother and a mother who love each other." There is nothing wrong with being gay. The gay people in the world aren't going to go away, so just accept it and stop throwing cruel words around.

  • Incests, zoophiles, polyamorists, alcoholics, drug-addicts, criminals, rapists, pedophiles and asexuals are not going to go but you can discourage their ill behaviour. Mother and Father affect the child a lot because they reflect the basis of society don't they? Let us allow more than two people to raise a child or perhaps some apes.

  • What the hell is wrong with an asexual person being a parent? 0.o

  • NatDemUK: I've never heard such nonsense and mindless schpeel. Your views (as much as they are your own) are closed, non-minded & highly prejudiced. You compare entirely different characteristics as though they are one, when they couldn't be much further from one another. Your opinions are best kept to yourself, as they are obscene & without reason.

    I am a straight male, in a long term relationship, gay issues have no concern to me, nor should they to you. Unless the denial is because.....

  • lukema, SHUT THE HELL UP!! Homosexuality is not a race, it is a preference just like incest, polyamory and zoophilia. All four of them are an attack on the family unit, so actually it is liberal morons like you who are all politically correct and mindless because none of them have no value to society at all whereas heterosexuality does.

  • @NatDemUK, I assume you believe yourself to be a value to society then... again, i think you have missed the point that you cannot compare this one issue to the others you have mentioned, as incest, polyamory and zoophilia have no connection to homosexuality.

    Unless that is, that you believe that homosexuals also like sexual contact with children and animals.

    I assume you believe also that you can force your opinion more-so by telling adverse beliefs to 'shut the hell up'.

    Shame.

  • lukema- to belive in the heteronormative structure of society as sacred is a deep value or else we would be wiped off the planet. Yes, you can compare homosexuality with incest, polyamory and zoophilia because they are all damaging lifestyles to society and they are all despised upon.

  • @NatDemUK I don't despise homosexuals. Neither do many others, so your comment is unfortunately wrong. Shame the views are low on this video, otherwise it could have been thumbs up/down polled to show you this. You are in a smaller minority of people unwilling to accept homosexuality.

    However, for purposes of interest, what would you do if you were out at say, a party, and a homosexual person was to say 'Gay people should have the right to marriage', how would you react?

  • No lukema, your opinion is fundamentally wrong, I have absolutely no reason to accept homosexuality just like I have no reason to accept incest, polyamory or zoophilia. You are just naive in your own world, you are unable to see that.

    Does homosexuality have a value to society? No. Does zoophilia? No. If I were at a part and that someone said that to me, I would laugh because then I would say "Let's have incest marriage" or "Polyamory marriage".

  • @NatDemUK To be honest, i don't think it is as fundamentally incorrect as you believe it to be, and again, you compare homosexuality to things that are of an entirely different nature. I truthfully don't believe that you would be so ballsy as to verbally admit your hate of homosexuality.

    If that is indeed the case, and you truthfully do believe you have no fear towards expressing your opinion verbally, i challenge you you create a video response to this and see the reaction you receive.

  • lukema- you are just being plain naive, you just do not realise that there is absolutely no value in homosexuality at all- homosexuality is related to incest, zoophilia and polyamory because they are all relationship lifestyles that undermine the monogamous heternormative structure of society, and are therefore frowned up and have been outlawed.

  • NatDem-it's the same in the US, children of single parents do far worse statistically in terms of not finishing school going to college earning less and much more likely to end up in a gang and then prison.

    Most single parents would prefer to have a loving spouse to help them out and every child deserves both a mummy and a daddy.

    We don't let crack addicts adopt children and we shouldn't let homosexuals either

  • Why are you comparing gays to crack addicts when there are numerous studies done by the APA proving there is no evidence that gays are unfit for parenting OR that children who come from gay parents are in any way disadvantaged from straight parents?

    Prejudice is not a reasonable justification for denying gay people the right to raise children anymore than it is for denying the right to any other minority group.

  • Because homosexuality and drug addiction are despisable lifestyles, you are not born with them, you choose them. Are you going to allow a threesome to adopt a child? A child needs a married man and woman so then he can differentiate the distinction between the two opposite genders for the two reflect the identity of the family unit.

  • Homosexuality and drug addiction are not synonymous. That's like equating all black people to thugs. The vast majority of gay people are just trying to live their lives like anybody else.

    If you aren't gay yourself, how do you know it's not a choice? Have you ever talked to a gay person or befriended them? You should honestly not speak for gays as if you know what it's like if you have never experienced the horror of growing up gay. It wasn't a choice for me, my friends or my community.

  • No, comparing drug addicts and gays is not the same as comparing thugs with blacks because being black is a race, it is part of your physicality whereas being a thug, gay or drug addict are unnatural acts that destroy society. Those three are not a race, they are your actions so hence a choice. People who turned gay were also straight and became so because they felt depressed and had no confidence in anything.

  • I do agree with you! The homos do suck lost, depressed people into their group, especially people that are vulnerable and not confident of their sexuality.

  • gays only destroy society in your eyes because you let it bother you

  • Gays destroy society because society will no longer exist with it as the heteronormative structure is the basis of society.

  • So basically people who fit in your idea of "normal" can be a part of society? How about what I believe is normal, should everyone I consider not normal not be a part of society? I thought we all were a part of society as we all live on the same planet and breathe the same air and can learn from one another.

  • Absolutely, that is a common fact that society is based on the family unit- one man and one woman. Homosexuality, like zoophilia and promiscuity, have absolutely no value at all to society and must not be at all promoted to society.

  • If society was made up of all women, society would eventually die out, but it isnt wrong to be a woman, is it?

  • That is exactly what homosexuality is since it is about the union of the same genders.

  • "Homosexuality and drug addiction are not synonymous"

    Usually they are. Most drug addicts perform all kinds of risky behavior which winds up leading to an alternate gay lifestyle.

  • the studies your referring to mainly and only compare same sex arrangements to heterosexual single parents, divorced, and cohabiting parents NOT two biological married parents and these comparisons are only done at a very young age. there are no studies done on the long term adult achievements of these children like education, jobs, etc. also, these studies happen to be extremely limited especially compared to what is yielded from heterosexual married parents versus all the other arrangments

  • So should divorce be illegal as well? My parents got divorced when I was 8, and I can tell you that I have never felt limited in any way, and it didn't affect my parents love for me. At the same time, I see a lot of dysfunctional families that live in hell only for the sake of their children, which ends up hurting the children on the first place.

  • Divorce should be discouraged, I think. Ending pornography in the media would help and possibly being tough on adultery as well.

  • I agree totally with you. The free sex culture and the "ME" generation have banckrupt our society financially and morally

  • bloombabe is the lesbian who said she plans to get her gay male sperm donor pal to help cook up a baby so she and her gal pal can play house.

    The gay biological father won't be involved in raising the child but will be invited round on sperm donor day, (formerly Father's Day) before going home to his boyfwend and their adopted sprogs.

    The world is getting seriously screwed up by these dysfunctional freaks.

  • Bloomsbabe thinks that even if a man has had sex and relationships with various women but falls for a man, he has been gay all along and never straight! How retarded is that?! She clearly does not understand that it is a behaviour not a race.

  • The best gift you can give a child is eternal love and support. This can come from two gay men, two lesbians, hell 1 parent and a DOG just as easily as it can come from a man and a woman. Because two parents are same sex does NOT mean they somehow lose the ability to love, they do NOT lose intelligence and ability to raise a child. There are many, many children who have come from a male and female parent and had very unhappy lives.

    This video is ridiculously insulting - and lacks intelligence.

  • As a child of a single mother, this video made me cry.

    Not because it's touching, but because it is absolutely ignorant of the thousands of healthy, well-rounded individuals who come from divorced families, broken, or troubled families.

    The greatest gift you can give a child is love. My mother loved me, and even though my father wasn't there, my life has been a beautiful and worthwhile endeavor.

    This "advert" is downright offensive.

  • It is not ignorant it is true, the number of children in the country I am from are corrupt because they only have one single parent. It is such a disgrace to the family unit. A child needs a one mother and father no more.

  • @NatDemUK

    Do you have any idea how many children grew up wonderfully with only one parent?

    Do you know how many children from perfectly functional "family units" turned out utterly fucked up?

    I'm not corrupt. I came from a wonderful family, and I didn't need a father in my family to become a whole, healthy, and successful person.

    You're an idiot.

  • Yes I know many who grow up with one parent, many who do well happen to be just one child but when it comes to more than that, they become dysfunctional without a father figure leaving the poor mother to look after her children by herself. You may not be "dysfunctional" yourself but the majority of anti-social delinquents in Britain are without a father figure and those who come from family units do rather well actually. You are an idiot yourself because you want to support family break-ups.

  • Michelle-see how quickly you throw a tantrum when I expose the hypocrisy in your comments?

  • You haven't exposed anything.

    And I'm not "throwing a tantrum." I'm ridiculing you. (Is English your first language.) I'm heaping disdain upon you because you are a cruel, violent individual.

    Stop baiting. Grow up. Grow I heart. Stop with the ad hominem tactics. Be an adult.

  • Michelle you are such a drama queen!

    You turn very childish when cornered

  • My god, but you're bad with words.

    You've never had me "cornered." That implies that you're capable of putting forth an intelligent argument, which you aren't. You've never even piqued my interest with one of your remarks. You're absurd and hateful.

    Drama queen? Yeah, it's really dramatic to react against your trivialization of rape, and your revictimization of the raped.

    You're a worm.

    Skulk off. Stop w/the ad hominem "argument"s.

  • bloom-why doesn't your child deserve a real father?

    One who's there all the time to tuck them in and care for them.

    What did your child do wrong to be denied a father before they are even born?

  • bloom-why doesn't your child deserve a father?

  • My children will have a biological father that will always be a part of their life.

  • Why can't I tuck them in? Why can't my wife tuck them in? I am not denying my children anything. I am giving my children two loving parents. That in itself is a rare gift given to few.

  • Michelle-you used so many labels I lost count!

  • Not "labels." I'm not talking about you as part of a group. I'm denigrating you with a series of terms which describe, accurately, you acute mental illness. Not the same as generalizing about whole groups.

    You're sick, sick, sick.

  • Michelle-if people cannot be reduced to labels why do you hate pedophiles so much?

  • Gary: ad hominem. You're an idiot.

    "Rapist" isn't merely a label, you disgusting, filthy pig; its a designation used to describe people who are sociopathic, like you, and violent, like you, who commit heinous, invasive, destructive acts against others...like you.

    F**k you for continuing to use this example. You trivialize rape; think that makes you a man? No. It makes you less than a worm. It makes you waste.

  • You poor child surrounded by a bunch of screwed up wack jobs and weirdos

    Why can't Daddy live at home with the child?

  • Because their father will be living at his own house with his husband and their children. Because myself and my wife are more than capable of raising healthy, loved and well rounded children without a father in the home. Millions of households do it.

  • I wonder of bloom's poor child will celebrate Father's Day or Sperm Donor's Day ?

    How sick to willfully deny a child a daddy

  • Father's Day. My wonderful children will celebrate father's day in honor of the man who helped create them.

  • 97% of all sexual offenders are hetero men.

    95% of sexual assault victims know the offenders.

    Statistically: it's actually safer to place a child in a homosexual household than to merely believe that having a hetero father will keep them safe. That's too often not the case.

    Even knowing this: I'm not advocating against hetero fathers. Why? Because I'm not an ignoramus, like Gary. I recognize that people can't be reduced to groups/labels.

    Gary doesn't care about families.

  • Why won't Dad be allowed to live with his child?

    And vice versa?

  • They will certainly visit. Oh hey! Here's something fun. Daddy is a gay man who is married to another man. My children will be so blessed to be exposed to so many wonderful types of families.

  • How sad that you would condemn any child to such a weird, loveless childhood without a daddy.

    Maybe it's revenge for not having a father yourself

  • My mother raised me on her own and I turned out wonderfully. I have no problem with fathers. Or families with fathers. But my children will be raised by their Momma and their Baba instead. There's nothing wrong with being a little weird! And you can go fuck yourself. Because implying that my children will be raised without love is absolute garbage. They will be surrounded by so much love, family and friends. My kids will be lucky enough to have two loving parents. Not everyone gets that lucky.

  • bloom will he be living in the same house as his child ?

    Will he be involved with them on a daily basis like a normal father or will he be some kind of absentee token father ?

    Why don't you get a puppy instead of putting a child through all this anguish and stigma?

  • bloom typifies selfish lesbians who put their own interests ahead of the best interests of the child.

    She is obviously gloating about the fact her child will be denied a father

  • My children will be denied nothing. The doner is a dear friend of mine and they will grow up knowing him and about the contribution he made to our family. They will have uncles, grandfathers and other male influences. They will be loved greatly by their biological father. He will always be their father, though he will not be their parent.

  • Homosexuality used to be illegal. Who's to say pedophilia and bestiality may one day become legal just like their deviant bedfellow, homosexuality?

  • I could not agree more. He keeps on saying "Stay on track, homosexuality is not equal to illegal activity". He really does not get it.

  • Maine was about marriage equality

    not just HOMOSEXUAL marriage equality

    homosexuals like commercial always try to dodge this point since they don't want to face the inevitable follow-on consequences of redefining marriage for homosexuals

  • If a man and a man adopt a child that still reflects the identity of normal parenthood for it still helps a child to understand the values of the the same genders.

    NO harm done.

  • No it does not at all! You stupid idiot, it just represents two men, not one man and a woman are you too blind to recognise the difference? A child only needs one man to understand a man and one woman to understand a woman. Are you going to allow three men to raise a child since that would create a safe environment for a child?

  • Haha pets are more demanding than children! I'd rather have a house of kids than a house of pets!

  • "Homosexuality is not equal to heterosexuality jerk it is far more equal to illegal activity simply because it has always been regarded as so"

    Homosexuality is legal.

    Heterosexuality is legal.

    Are the above statements true or false?

  • The ones you name "illegal activity" are zoophilia, incest and polyamory. It is not a question of them being legal it is due to the fact that they are one's personal lifestyles which attack the nuclear family as does homosexuality.

  • "the nuclear family"

    ...is not present in the majority of our society.

    You can't keep that tradition alive. Sorry.....

  • Oh yes we can because there will be a time in future where everyone will understand that there are so many family breakdowns due to single parenting and that alternative lifestyles have no value at all.

  • NatDemUK, do you want to discriminate against heterosexually-married couples that want to adopt?

  • "Marriage keeps a man and a woman together to help create secure an environment for THEIR children whom they reproduced."

    Oh, and the man and woman that adopt...them too?

    So the same can be said for the man and man / woman and woman that also adopt.

    JUST LIKE with this family unit:

    /watch?v=59n7KINHxGI

  • If a man and a woman adopt a child that still reflects the identity of normal parenthood for it still helps a child to understand the values of the two opposite genders.

  • NatDemUK said: "You stupid fucking prick!!! "

    garysher3, you see this?

    This the tolerance that the defenders of the traditional family display, innit?

  • commercial is working hard to break up his own nuclear family by abandoning their faith and pursuing a homosexual, Christan-bashing lifestyle

  • "commercial is working hard to break up his own nuclear family by abandoning their faith and pursuing a homosexual, Christan-bashing lifestyle"

    Ad Hominem.

    garysher3, you need to start coming up with some REAL facts.

  • commercial-don't you come from a nuclear family?

    Do you hate your family this much?

  • "Do you hate your family this much?"

    HA HA HA!!!

    Ad hominem.

  • gay girlie-if you say you are fighting for marriage equality why would you want to exclude polygamists?

    And incest, child marriage etc?

    Were you lying about that 'equality' part just because it sounds good?

  • Listen up, people are going to continue to make babies regardless of marriage, so your stupid argument regarding tradition doesn't hold up, else you force ALL the HETEROsexuals to only make babies if they're married.

    Otherwise humanity on Earth is doing just fine of keeping the population on the RISE regardless of the ~10 years that gay marriage has been legal in certain countries.

  • But still marriage holds a family together as opposed to cohabitation which easily allows family breakdowns and heterosexuality is a necessary value to our existence and society not like homosexuality, incest, polyamory or even zoophilia. Marriage keeps a woman and a man together and provides a secure environment for children.

  • "But still marriage holds a family together as opposed to cohabitation"

    Which is why gay couples want to get married...because they want to join together with their respective families. That's one reason why I married my husband. Because I love his family as much as I love my own relatives.

  • That is not a family, that is a group when it is two people of the same gender just as it would between a threesome or foursome and a man from one family who marries a woman from another links both families together through procreation.

  • "That is not a family"

    Yes it is. It's not your precious 'traditional' family, but it is indeed a family and has been family since homosexual marriage became legal on Earth ~10 years ago.

    Tradition dies when you die. Sorry. Them's the breaks.

  • 10 years ago...WOW!! Not for a thousand years though and why? Because it is of no value to society. The traditional family is the normal family that unites the two opposite genders together which creates society and shows the distinction between the two genders as well. Do you call a group of best friends a family? No.

  • "Not for a thousand years though and why? Because it is of no value to society."

    This is 100% your personal speculation, NOT fact.

    So you think slavery should be legal just because it USED to be?

    How about discrimination against black people in America?

    Just because 50-500 years ago it used to be?

    So, NatDemUK, do you support slavery and discrimination against different races ???

    Why or why not?

  • "Because it is of no value to society.""

    So all of a sudden homosexuality is deemed as valuable to society, is that why homosexuality is LEGAL in our modern society?

    hahahahhaah your logic is funny.

  • Homosexuality is not a race it is a preference which is why it cannot be compared to discriminating black people because people are born black. Slavery is wrong because it exploits people but homosexuality serves no value at all and it is not the bedrock to society at all so there is no reason to promote gay marriage or gay lifestyles to children.

  • "Marriage keeps a woman and a man together and provides a secure environment for children. "

    GUESS WHAT?

    Marriage keeps a man and man together and provides a secure environment for children as well.

    Watch this for proof:

    /watch?v=59n7KINHxGI

  • Marriage keeps a threesome together and provides a secure environment for children as well, doesn't it? Fucking twat! Marriage keeps a man and a woman together to help create secure an environment for THEIR children whom they reproduced.

  • "Marriage keeps a threesome together and provides a secure environment for children as well, doesn't it?"

    I don't know, I'm not in a threesome marriage, and I don't know anyone that is or wants to be in one.

    Do you?

    Stay on track. Gay marriage is about TWO people.

  • Gay marriage could be about three people since I am talking about threesomes and since gay marriage undermines the traditional family unit i.e. one man and one woman- a couple of the opposite genders rather than THREE of the same gender. Just think of that for a while.

    Look up watch?v=VEaKU--BvVo on polyamory

  • "Gay marriage could be about three people"

    Nobody's fighting to make it legal, which is why it has no bearing in this conversation.

  • Yes they are since there is polyamory pride HOW MANY MORE FUCKING TIMES THAT I HAVE TO EXPLAIN????!!!

  • Can you stop using offensive language? Would you like it if I called every man a dick? Or if I called every black person a nigger? Would that be appropriate? No. In the same way that it's not appropriate to call women who love women dykes. My children are going to come from me and a sperm doner. And raised by me and my wife. And the fact remains, you and no one else will ever be able to deny me the right to raise beautiful children with my wife. You can never do that.

  • How naive and pathetic! At the end of the children are going to want to know who their dad is, they will wonder what was the point in having someone who is not kin-related to them at all. At the end of the day, you used a man's semen to get inpregnated. Children need a father figure dear!

  • As I said above, my children will grow up with the knowledge of who is their biological father. They will be raised by Momma and Baba, but their biological father will always be called Dad and he will always be honored on father's day for the contribution he made to our family. Me, my heterosexual brother, and my heterosexual sister were all raised without a father. And we are all bright, successful and fully functioning adults. Fathers are wonderful. But parents don't require a specific gender.

  • Oh right so why can the children not live with him? Why can you not dump your girlfriend and go off with the man? There is no point just raising children with two women because then they would not understand the values of the two genders together and parents do require gender because children need to know values of the two opposite genders since they are the foundation of the family. So there is not much point having a lesbian girlfriend, why not have an extra girlfriend as well?

  • Because men do not satisfy me sexually or emotionally. I am attracted to women in every sense of the word just as you are. They will see models of straight families just as much as they see models of gay families. They will go to school with children with straight parents. And I have no doubt that they will see all kinds of wonderful families and know exactly what makes up a family: People who love each other. Exactly what my children will have. Love. And plenty of it.

  • Gay "families" do not exist, they are just groups. Family is founded by a man and a woman and a child needs to look to that, they will go to children from straight parents and those children will think how strange to think that one can have two mummies and why is that? because there is no such thing as having two mothers but one, so sorry child needs a father figure as well. A groups of friends love each other do you call them a family? No. A family is a blood-related group born of man & woman

  • So...wait...couples who adopt children don't qualify as families? Because that might just be the most offensive thing anyone has ever said.

  • "If a penis goes into someone's arse that is still of no value"

    If your penis goes in your wife's mouth that's apparently got no value either, BUT YOU STILL DO IT.

  • NatDem: commercial's parents and sisters are devout Christians.

    Can you imagine how heartbroken they are that their son and brother rejected Christianity chose to be a homosexual and then spends all his time bashing Christians?

    What parent would be proud of a son who did that?

  • I certainly would not. It is such a shame that social liberalism has perverted the tradtional nuclear family, why should it be so perverted just for the sake of "rights"? It is just total perversion.

  • "It is just total perversion. "

    Apparently by your standards, so is your sexual foreplay, but that doesn't stop you from doing it.

  • Sexual foreplay is just an act and it is a way of making the sex process more enjoyable.

  • "Sexual foreplay is just an act and it is a way of making the sex process more enjoyable. "

    Exactly...which also applies to homosexual sex.

    So keep your elitist sexual activity to yourself. You perform 'unnatural' sex just as much as homosexuals do, hypocrite.

  • Again you still have missed my point even if the two practise foreplay which has more value? The heterosexual couple because they represent the link between the two opposite genders of the species which lead to procreation, homosexuals do not because the latter are the same gender whereas the former are not, the former are the opposite.

  • "the former are the opposite."

    SO WHAT. Your point doesn't hold up when discussing procreation because heterosexuals will STILL be having sex outside of marriage and will STILL be creating babies regardless of marriage.

    Marriage does not guarantee procreation anyway; there are tens of thousands of couples who:

    1. Do not want to have children.

    2. Can not biologically have children.

    So your 'procreation' argument is as redundant as your 'traditional marriage'.

  • Eventually they will be wanting to get married so that their children have two parents rather than just one.

    Marriage helps to procreate and even those who do not want children but still get married still reflect the identity of a man and a woman together as the foundation of a society and they may change their mind, they might want to have children.

  • "Eventually..."

    SPECULATION does not equal fact.

  • "Can you imagine how heartbroken they are that their son and brother rejected Christianity chose to be a homosexual and then spends all his time bashing Christians?"

    Ad hominem. I've already told you that my parents don't care about my decision to not be associated with religion.

    Again you lie about my personal life with no proof.

    Also, I don't bash all Christians. I only point out YOUR hypocrisy.

    /watch?v=mvhxZmdsUYk

  • The fact is homosexuals just look for sexual gratification anyway they can.

    If they cannot find a receptive anus then a gloryhole in the wall will do, right commercial?

  • "The fact is homosexuals just look for sexual gratification anyway they can."

    Ha ha ha what a generalized blanket statement. Tell that to all the heterosexual men who fantasize and watch porn involving LESBIANS.

    Hahahahahah.

  • Sad these homosexuals lead such empty wretched lives trying to deny truth and reality

  • Exactly, thecommercialedge goes on that I have no proof that a man and a woman do not make a family, what planet is he on?! It is great that Maine said Yes to Proposition 1

  • "thecommercialedge goes on that I have no proof that a man and a woman do not make a family"

    I did not say that.

    Stop lying.

    I talked about the inclusion of my husband in the family unit, because he IS legally a part of my family.

  • He is not part of your family and he never will be because you are a man, not a woman. Hence the two of the same gender do not reflect the identity of the family unit since the family is not about a couple it is also about bringing children into existence.

  • What's really sad is that garysher3, as a self-proclaimed Christian, LIES about other Christians for fun.

    Proof:

    /watch?v=mvhxZmdsUYk

  • ok lol

  • right when u str8 fucks get married and make it last like how ur "god" wants it to be and u dont beat ur child,touch ur child,kill ur child.i'll turn str8.but i wont bet on that.marriage between a man and a woman..what a sick joke.

  • 53 to 47.... fucking bullshiiiit.

    There should be no charity for either "Yes on 1" or "No on 1." IF people are going to vote they MUST research what they are voting on to clearly understand both sides, then and only then should they make an opinion to vote.

    THERE SHOULD BE NO VOTES BASED OFF OF A COMMERCIAL!

  • "they MUST research what they are voting on to clearly understand both sides, then and only then should they make an opinion to vote."

    If that were the case, Dubya wouldn't have had even ONE term, let alone two.

  • "Gay marriage has now lost in every single state -- 31 in all -- in which it has been put to a popular vote"

    Let the people speak, and they will be heard- loud and clear.

  • hightide-perhaps you haven't yet seen commercial's complete intolerance toward Christians, other people of faith and the defenders of traditional marriage

  • garysher3 said: "hightide-perhaps you haven't yet seen commercial's complete intolerance toward Christians, other people of faith and the defenders of traditional marriage"

    I tolerate traditional marriage. I respect every marriage, gay and/or straight. In fact, I'm legally married in a newly-traditional way.

    I'm not tolerant of your 10-year rampage on the GLBT community, though.

    Proof (something HE doesn't have):

    google: garysher gay marriage

    google yeson8won gay marriage

  • I would tolerate "defenders of traditional marriage" if they weren't telling lies about my parents phone number as being a gay sex line

    /watch?v=mvhxZmdsUYk

    ..or threatening me and my husband with physical violence:

    /watch?v=T_OLqiJi7Hc

    I do tolerate people of faith, and I do tolerate Christians, which is why I don't go to religious websites and bash them.

    In fact, I don't go to religious websites at all as I'm not religious.

  • Let's be honest, how many parents would want to send their son off to summer camp with a homosexual scout leader?

  • Let's be honest, how many parents' phone numbers are gay sex lines?

    According to garysher3, my Christian parents' phone number is, or so he claims.

    Proof:

    /watch?v=mvhxZmdsUYk

    Why he spreads lies about Christians?

    Only he knows.

  • let's be honest, how many kids would care if those parents could show tollerance and compasion?

    FYI most child molesters are straight.

  • NatDem-please excuse commercialedge

    He's a homosexual so will never be a parent

  • garysher3 said: "He's a homosexual so will never be a parent "

    Well that's another blatant lie. Don't you know how the laws work, garysher? Gay marriage includes the right to adopt children.

    There's absolutely nothing stopping me and my husband from becoming parents.

    Same goes for the homosexual couple in the following video whom are raising two children in a fully-functioning family unit:

    /watch?v=59n7KINHxGI

  • Its a shame he commercialedge isn't one already. I'm sure the lessons of tolerence he would teach would be much better served to this world then your hate.

  • "Let the homos buy a puppy instead and leave the children alone"

    Leave the children alone in an adoption agency instead of having two people care for them?

    That isn't a stable life for the child at all.

    Children don't NEED gender-based people to raise them properly, children need proper role models and guidance, and there is no proof that a gay couple that adopt deprive the child of a positive upbringing.

    PROOF:

    /watch?v=59n7KINHxGI

  • Every child deserves both a mummy and a daddy in a loving stable home.

    A couple of homosexuals can NEVER provide this for a child.

    Why should children be condemned to a childhood of confusion, stigma and weirdness just to placate the selfish urges of a couple of homosexuals?

    The children's interests should always come first.

    Let the homos buy a puppy instead and leave the children alone

  • ..."Every child deserves both a mummy and a daddy"...

    I wanted the 'Wolfman', or Frankenstein and a 'daddy'.

    All I got was Maria Ospenskya and a gypsy aunt.

    And they weren't 'mummified'....

  • THIS SHOULD HAVE READ;

    Every child deserves love. Regardless of those who offers gender.

    A Couple of homosexuals could do just a good of job as i can if not better.

    Why should children be left alone in the world when someone will care for them, regardless of my selfish thoughts on sexuality.

    My own fears shouldn't effect the world around me.

    Let the homos buy a puppy for thier kids if that kid wants one.

  • RIGHT ON!!!!!!

    *high fives*

  • The APA, has agreed that children need a loving home, with two parents/ parental figures. Whether one needs to male and the other female, is NOT necessary. As long as the home is stable, and yes, a gay home can be stable- then children can have the possibility of a GOOD childhood.

  • this video is bullshit  =)

  • 24 Peradventure there be fifty righteous within the city: wilt thou also destroy and not spare the place for the fifty righteous that are therein? God help us to find mercy for deliverance

  • not only will hate speech be removed, but so will any evidence that contradicts their point of view.

    typical.

  • you can lead a person to evidence but you can't make people think yes when thay just want no help from you no matter how good you are yes

  • this person deletes every comment that has a link to scholarly studies that prove that children of gay parents fare as well as those with straight parents. you are a bunch of liars and deceivers. and you wonder why fewer and fewer people respect christians and christianity.

  • From my childhood, (and others i have spoken with felt the same.) I wanted my parents to devorce. They were allways argueing, and could never keep any kind of peace.

    When i was 12 I asked to "call off" xmas, because i didn't want the drama anymore.

    I would have loved to have had a childhood with two adults that just loved each other. REGARDLESS of gender.

    My GIFT would have been again, NO MATTER THE SEX! Am i gay? no, i'm not. (not even bi) But give me flamers over bigots any day!!

  • Regardless of gender? Idiot, gender are two distinctions in life, man and woman are both physically, biologically and psychologically different and a child needs to understand that because a child is an offspring of the two genders. If you are going to say that gender does not matter, are you going to say that the number of people in the relationship does not matter by allowing triples or quadruples to get married? Are you going to say that it does not matter if you are family-related as well?

  • what does a child care of your ideals?

    I don't think the # matters, love is love, and a child learns from many. every heard the saying "it takes a village to raise a child"? its in reference to the way they learn and seek attention and push bounds.

    Of course it matters the relation. that will create retarded hate mongers like you. What doesn't matter, and the point you miss, is a child doesn't have a sense of who shows love. they only know if they are getting love. 2 guys are better then 0

  • A child would care a lot because a child is the offspring of a man and a woman and needs to grow up understanding the two different values of the two genders. A mother figure is always needed to raise a child. Hate-mongers like me? Grow up, a family is the result of sexual intercourse between two genders and it is the bedrock of society. Why don't you allow brother and sister to get married since that is based on love? Why not a triple or quadruple since that is based on love? One guy & one doll

  • "A mother figure is always needed to raise a child."

    That's not necessarily true. Gender-role isn't as important as the values the child learns to succeed in life.

    Otherwise you're generalizing all women as being the same in the role of the mother, and everyone knows that not all mothers share the same rules / values with her child(ren).

    There are many men staying at home with the kid(s) while the mother goes out and works.

    Bedrock is always shifting. Deal with it.

    There's no harm done.

  • Yes a mother figure is needed because a woman has more nuturing attitude than a man, since single parents always happen to be women. Gender role is important, men and women are not the same- the man is the head whereas the woman is the heart. When you go to a nursery or playgroup you always find women, not men, as more responsible to young children. Are you going to allow a group of three to raise a child since you say that it is all about love and security?

  • "the man is the head whereas the woman is the heart."

    This is not applicable in our modern society. It's akin to the 1950's nuclear family rationale....

    Are you suggesting it's wrong for men to stay at home while the woman goes out and works?

    There's NO proof that same-sex couples cause any problems to a child being brought up in their care.

    Same goes for gay marriage; there's no proof that it causes any damage to anyone.

  • Yes I know that it is not applicable to modern society because it shows how perverse this society really is and yes, the 1950s rationale was rather normal unlike today.

    Gay adoption and gay marriage do cause problems because they destroy the union between the opposite genders, they spread HIV and they do not make a family. A child needs one mother and one father.

    What next- a group of three looking after a child?

  • How does me marrying my girlfriend destroy the union of heterosexuals?I am all for straight people continuing to marry as they always have. And, actually, Black women are the leaders in new HIV cases. So perhaps you should get your medical facts straight.

    As for you, "they do not make a family" case, it really makes me want to punch you. I am going to be marrying my girlfriend here very soon and it is in our ten year plan to have children. My biological children. What about that is not a family?

  • You really are dyke aren't you? Marriage is not a private thing, it is public as well. It is a reflection of the esoteric character of the union of the two opposites that keep the species and society going. Marriage between man and woman makes the bedrock of society for the two produce children. Marriage is not limited to polyamory, homosexuality, incest nor zoophilia and no gays do not make a family, but straights do.

  • "Marriage between man and woman makes the bedrock of society for the two produce children."

    The bedrock shifts eventually.

    You can not stop this.

  • Errr yes we can stop it, so are you going to promote incest? Zoophilia? Polyamory?

  • "Errr yes we can stop it, so are you going to promote incest? Zoophilia? Polyamory?"

    No, I'm not associated with those types of people in any way. I don't even know one person on earth who's involved with those attractions.

    Why, do YOU promoting those illegal activities, NatDemUK?

  • No don't you see? Those types of lifestyles undermine the family unit just like homosexuality and there are people involved in those lifestyles. I am not promoting them at all, you are so obsessed about bigotted straights are because they will not have gay marriage yet you never go attacking us for not allowing incest, zoophile or polyamorists to get married do you?

  • "you never go attacking us for not allowing incest, zoophile or polyamorists to get married do you? "

    So do YOU support those illegal activities?

    Do you know of ANY people that are fighting for those illegal activities to become legal...or even better yet, do you know of any of those people who are fighting to be married?

    Resounding answer = NO

    So why do you keep bringing it up?

  • NO!! I do not support these unnatural activities and it is funny that you consider them illegal because homosexuality was illegal and since you say that homosexuality is based on individual preference and that it is loving then say the same about polyamory, incest or zoophilia.

  • "Those types of lifestyles undermine the family unit"

    You have NO PROOF.

    You can't even speak from experience.

    You simply are obsessed about discriminating homosexuals of their rights and benefits based on your personal feelings, not factual truth.

    Yeah, keep lying; you've obviously convinced yourself of your false claims.

    Gay marriage harms nobody, and there is no proof otherwise.

    Speculation does not equal factual truth.

  • IT IS SO FUCKING OBVIOUS THAT IT UNDERMINES THE FAMILY UNIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What makes a family? A man and a woman because the two procreate and make a future for our children and society. I keep lying? No, you are always trying to make people think that the two are the same which they are not!

  • "What makes a family?"

    Well my family consists of my husband and myself and our respective brothers, sisters, parents all joined by marriage.

    Easy concept, yet you seem to think otherwise because you have a closed mind.

    Open your mind. There's no harm done.

  • What brought you all into existence? The family. What makes the family? man and woman. How did they bring you into existence? Procreation. Retard.

  • My parents fucking brought me into existence. And many others. The family is a support structure to help us deal with the world around us. Not a man and woman. A man and woman is my live in GF. we don't want kids. Don't like the idea of adding people to the world people like you make a hatful place to live. You shame your ape decendents (who often have homosexual sex) who did have sex your way to get you here. Stop making the babies cry with your lies

    Retard.

  • You are a retard yourself because that is what brought you, me and everyone else into existence: one man and one woman hence that is the bedrock of the familly unity. Does homosexuality make a family? No Does polyamory make a family? No. Stop accusing us of hate, you are nothing but a lowlife political correct swine who wants to promote alternative lifestyles to attack the traditional family unit.

  • PLEASE DO A SEARCH TO DEFINE "FAMILY". It will do you great good, to shut up.

    BUT WAIT!!! i'm just a lowlife? plitical correct pig? TO ATTACK TRADITIONAL FAMILY UNIT???? (dun dum dummmmm) its a conspiricy! and i'm the leader... nice. ITs good to be the king.

    Please offer something else i can point out all your flaws, or just shut up. Name calling will get you no farther then trying to get a gay guy pregnant with a sharpie, just isn't effective. Do you have any other points you small person?

  • I think that it is so blatently obvious to know what the traditional family unit is and that is where you have one man and one woman who have reproduced their own children and have raised them and brought them up. No, I just think that you are stupid and naive and think that you can attack people who have heavy high value on tradition because they undermine your egalitarian agenda. So what next, are you going to promote incest? Polyamory? Even zoophilia?

  • "I think" I doubt you do, but that is the problem. You continue to push what you want onto others. This is called OPRESSION. when the majority (people like us, heteros) subject the minority (homos) to the will of the the many. I prefer "stupid and naive" to you, then to be like you by any ones count. sadly I am straight, otherwise i would go suck cock, and marry a guy named albert just to piss you (and others like you) off. but I'm not, so its [cont]

  • not a choice. I will promote your demise and those like you to falter, and fail. I will put every resorce i can muster to the cause of ensureing your type of hate will die in its own disgrace. This is the world that waits your children. I, for one, can't wait!

  • Yes it is a choice, not a race. It is a behaviour and an unnecessary behaviour to society. Again, you use your politically correct vocabulary such as "hate" again and again, this is not hate it is common sense to preserve the family unit. I have no problem with normal gays/ bisexuals who do not want gay marriage nor adoption and value the family unit, the ones I hate are these gay power activists who wish to pervert everything!

  • "Unnecessary behaviour to society" like tv? or radio? wait those are tools of society. What about, worship? yeah there is a true "unnexessary behaviour to society" so is game night, yet its done, (even sanctioned) by you, i'm sure.

    Its not "politically correct" to call you a hate monger. Its Common sense.

    To paraphrase (look it up)

    "as long as they know thier place, i'm fine with them. WHEN they stay in thier place!"

    Bet you sure would like a "darkie" to bring you a cup of tea. free even.