This video is not quite accurate since Small Business (SB) still assumes the risk. Here is how it works. SB assigns invoice to factor. Factor advances a % of invoice to SB, usually 70 to 80%. Amount with-held is called reserve. If Nordstroms fails to pay the invoice on time (usually 90 days) factor will close out the invoice by applying SB's reserve funds towards the unpaid invoice. If the invoice is paid on time factor returns the reserve balance to sb less factoring fees, usually 4%-6%.
How is the relationship between parties effected if say 1/4 of the shoes delivered are rejected by Nordstroms for defects (real or imagined)? Who sucks this up?
I love your videos! I now have a whiteboard in my living room for my stock trading and it helps me,thanks! I also appreciate that your smart,I live in Las Vegas and I don't interact with many smart people here,thank god for the internet or I would starve!
I'm confused. So rather than getting 4000 back from Nordstroms, he gets 3500 back from Ed which is 500 less? How is that better? Why isn't Ed as much as a risk as Nordstroms? How can the shoemaker guarantee he gets any money back from either of these two?
The factorer assumes ALL the risk because he/she pays for the rights to the receivable UP FRONT. The factorer then assumes all the responsibility to collect on the invoice - that may include followup calls, sending multiple invoices, and possibly never receiving payment (the use of JWN here was a bit misguided (in my opinion) because JWN would almost certainly make the payments on time and without much hassle). I think this is a correct response to your question.
It just sucks that when businesses uses factoring, it cuts into their profits. It seems to me that its like a check cashing place for businesses. Well done on the vid!!
Thank you for your very well explained video. Congress bail out the banks, and now the banks are even stronger than ever and taking advantage of the small people and small business owners. This means that the banks have planned all for their absolute control of money and power. Wow...now I can see clearlier than ever....
You say Sam needs money to expand, but he will get 500$ less each month in the deal with Ed. That doesnt make any sense. If Sam need a stady income it should work out fine. But he wont get more money to expand in this way. or am I wrong?
he does get less money but the reason that businesses use factoring is because they can get their hands on 'instant' finance instead of waiting "30 days". for instance supermarkets are known to pay their suppliers anything up to 90 days after goods have been delivered.
when CIT fails, the banks will come in and charge much higher interest rates...i am guessing the govts will not bail out CIT like they did with banks. The Bankers are taking over commerce and finance as we know it. They got their aces.
i still dont understand how factoring is a means of obtaining a greater cash flow
darkaurora11 3 days ago
Nice! a Penis, so this is Science?????
TheLadykiller47 1 month ago
Sam's mother was a giraffe.
ThatGuyInTheBasement 1 month ago
Excellent, thanks, D. (Canada)
Dervalgue 2 months ago
you're a god's given gift in teaching,hats off to you..........
princejag 2 months ago
Exclente explicação. Muito bom mesmo!
1willbsb 3 months ago
This video is not quite accurate since Small Business (SB) still assumes the risk. Here is how it works. SB assigns invoice to factor. Factor advances a % of invoice to SB, usually 70 to 80%. Amount with-held is called reserve. If Nordstroms fails to pay the invoice on time (usually 90 days) factor will close out the invoice by applying SB's reserve funds towards the unpaid invoice. If the invoice is paid on time factor returns the reserve balance to sb less factoring fees, usually 4%-6%.
realdirt100 3 months ago
Excellent , thank you.
lesanne2 3 months ago
Man... This guy is phenomanel with explaing in terms that anyone can understand.
Your videos are awsome and again, I appreciate what your doing for the common folks like myself!
briansomethin 6 months ago
u r awsum....sir..!!
damianjohn1000 10 months ago
Very comprehensive explanation. Thanks from Spain (Barcelona)
NETSLAVE77 11 months ago
i need a drink now
cray32 2 years ago
How is the relationship between parties effected if say 1/4 of the shoes delivered are rejected by Nordstroms for defects (real or imagined)? Who sucks this up?
nTheQ 2 years ago
I love your videos! I now have a whiteboard in my living room for my stock trading and it helps me,thanks! I also appreciate that your smart,I live in Las Vegas and I don't interact with many smart people here,thank god for the internet or I would starve!
shaylo2006 2 years ago
their my shoes!:)
mlndstream 2 years ago
I'm confused. So rather than getting 4000 back from Nordstroms, he gets 3500 back from Ed which is 500 less? How is that better? Why isn't Ed as much as a risk as Nordstroms? How can the shoemaker guarantee he gets any money back from either of these two?
elpresidio 2 years ago 3
The factorer assumes ALL the risk because he/she pays for the rights to the receivable UP FRONT. The factorer then assumes all the responsibility to collect on the invoice - that may include followup calls, sending multiple invoices, and possibly never receiving payment (the use of JWN here was a bit misguided (in my opinion) because JWN would almost certainly make the payments on time and without much hassle). I think this is a correct response to your question.
gng007 2 years ago
Excellent explanations as usual. Good job!
ewap8 2 years ago 6
It just sucks that when businesses uses factoring, it cuts into their profits. It seems to me that its like a check cashing place for businesses. Well done on the vid!!
jjron5304 2 years ago
Easy explanation! Thanks.
VladimirCA 2 years ago 4
What a great explanation......so according to this dude investing in the beverage industry will do well.
fazholio 2 years ago
hahaha! nice one faz :)
ewap8 2 years ago 2
Thank you for your very well explained video. Congress bail out the banks, and now the banks are even stronger than ever and taking advantage of the small people and small business owners. This means that the banks have planned all for their absolute control of money and power. Wow...now I can see clearlier than ever....
SilverRose09 2 years ago
You say Sam needs money to expand, but he will get 500$ less each month in the deal with Ed. That doesnt make any sense. If Sam need a stady income it should work out fine. But he wont get more money to expand in this way. or am I wrong?
BabyBacon 2 years ago
he does get less money but the reason that businesses use factoring is because they can get their hands on 'instant' finance instead of waiting "30 days". for instance supermarkets are known to pay their suppliers anything up to 90 days after goods have been delivered.
seanyb12345 2 years ago
The $500 figure was used as an example. In real situations factors rarely charge more than 3%, or $120 on $4,000.
meliscu1 2 years ago
when CIT fails, the banks will come in and charge much higher interest rates...i am guessing the govts will not bail out CIT like they did with banks. The Bankers are taking over commerce and finance as we know it. They got their aces.
FrancisPayne 2 years ago
So the long and short is that CIT and many other colosles should have have been split up for purposes of fire breaks a long time ago.
Now we have a domino chain of monoliths.
cosmosgato 2 years ago
Good Explanation.
sgdsuy 2 years ago
Now I get it!!!!!!!!!! Great job explaining the relationship!!!
UpTick21 2 years ago