Added: 3 years ago
From: pacoreglas
Views: 118,757
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,024)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • What if the enemy has the tech to take out US satellites? It all comes down to the guy holding the stick

  • tom clany creator of hawx 2

  • @legocomedeyman Tom Clancy writes war novels, the game is named after him.

  • @Hello6761 oh

  • Wow ! How come I didn't know this movie ?

  • F 22 is the best of the bests

  • Weve been battling Russian aircraft for decades and now French?

  • @Megalodon64 no dude those are terrorist forces

  • B-1R would be legit

  • Dear lord, some how the B1-R is only going to be "damaged" but not going up in flames because its American?

    The hubris, oh the hubris...

  • Ir's amazing how biased towards the F-22 this entire "hypothetical scenario" is. If you want real information, better go see the results of mock military exercises. FWIW, the Su-30MKI has been beating the F-22 by sheer acrobatic manouverability in Operation Red Flag for the last 3 years.

  • @nashixe 

  • @nashixe The Su-30MKI has only gone up against F-15's where the Su-30MKI's won in 2004 and the F-15's won in 2008.

  • @Hello6761 I personally believe that the Cope India excercies were mutually and politically set up by the US and India. The IAF tells its government, "See how capable we are? We need more funding!" The USAF tells its government, "See how deficient we are? We need more funding!"

  • @Hello6761 The Su-30MKIs "won" when it was 12 vs 4 and the F-15s were not allowed to use BVR missiles. Basically, they were fighting outnumbered with 1 hand tied behind their back.

  • @AcesHighTrooper69 I agree, the F-15 were 'neutered' when against the MKI's.

  • Wow I can't belive the French aircraft survived I guess the jet surrendered to the missle.

  • all this because we can't get along

  • @aadeebindy I agree. Why CANT the U>S and Russia get along. We wast millions on bullets, missles, jets, tanks, guns, bombers, more and most importantly lives just because we dont agree withy each other.

    Thats just sad. :(

  • @aadeebindy

    Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. This is not a way of life at all in any true sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it is humanity hanging from a cross of iron.

    D. Eisenhower

  • @mohiahmed1

    Its still cool to have a military though

  • by 2016 ... thr will be

    MKI + Rafale + T-50 coming to burn Raptor's ASS ....

  • Dont worry, F-22 can detect Su-30MKI at 280km...

  • @MilitaryAircraft101 But needs to drop down to 60/80km to launch AMRAAMs

  • @MilitaryAircraft101 Su-30mki has Tarang jammer..most advanced in the world that can jam the most power radar beams at comfortable distance giving it unique stalth character without actually being stealthy..not only that it can manipulate incoming radar beams and target it to null..

  • @lablask no. the f35 has the most power radar/jammer in the world

  • @lablask No jammer can jam a good AESA radar. There are too many frequencies operating simultaneously over too wide a band. Also, these frequencies are changing 1000 times per second. You can jam some of the signals some of the time, but certainly not all of them all the time. Given the Su-30's huge size and design characteristics, it is a sitting duck for BVR missiles from a stealthy aircraft.

  • F-22 undetected at 5 miles by Su-30??? More like 12 miles... :o

  • @MilitaryAircraft101 more like 5 miles bud

  • @SuperHamstery 18km... or 11.1846 mi.

  • @MilitaryAircraft101 They forgot about Su-30 IRST infrared sensor. It would detect the raptors un to 90km if they light up afterburners.

  • @ElementoVolatile wrong the IRST cant see a f-22 till 50km head on rear is 90km because thats where the engine is.

  • @nick74178ify irst cant detect a raptor unitl at least 28km away. probably less

  • If war is going to be as hopeless as this then I'm not becoming a pilot.That is unless I'm in the F-22.

  • @MostwantedLover1 or an f35

    

  • @magpulEli24 Or an Su-47?O_O :P

  • Comment removed

  • yeah im ready for a FB23 lol

  • I didn't say that F-15/16/18 are better. I said raptor. Raptor beats all..for now. That's just it, It's to much and it's to true for the "Russian fanboys".

  • First of all, im not bagging the raptor, i think from what we know it is an amazing aircraft and im sure we dont even know the half of it.

    However

    Ive been smirking through this entire video, it's a little much, dont you think? Is this informational or a fucking sales pitch? Theyre making the other planes out to be third world hunks of shit and the " Big bad Americans" out to be conquering heroes.

    Im not anti american either, infact i married one.. it's just all a bit silly imo.

  • Can't wait to see the Raptor in action. If nothing else... to shut up the biased nay sayers. I know it's hyped up a bit, but the truth is it's not that far of. The russian and euro aircraft are something to be proud of. I get it. I like them too. Sorry... there number two and three. When the F-35 comes on line it will take number two and T-50 and J-20 will probable mop the Eurofighter and Rafale. F-22 and F-35 are about 5 to 10 years ahead in tech. Thank your the show.

  • see how biased this shit program is? the enemy missile will just damage american aircraft, while the american missile will totally destroy the n\enemy aircraft

  • F-22 sustained turn rate is 28 degree per second vs 25 for the Eurofighter, 22 for the Su-30MKI and 21 for a Mig-29. Nothing can turn with a Raptor. Euro is very close at low level and low speed. Supersonic nothing can touch a Raptor.

  • @gahauria not only can the raptor outurn a sukhoi, but i can perform a zero speed turn and has greater speed bleed/regain ability than any other fighter, basically a raptor can maintain its speed better in a turning fight a thus the raptor will win in a dogfight, that is unless the raptors start killing sukhois at 60 miles plus and the pilots deside to turn tail, which might be the smartest choice

  • @packr72

    Suhkois also can do the zero speed turn shit. the 35s and the pak fa also use AESA radars, 3D thrust vectoring to the raptors 2D, and i hear the new russian missles are pretty good, may even compete with Aim-9x's. also, im American, just to put that out there. Also with the onstant problems the Raptor prgram is having, you will have to wait til lthe overpriced F-35s(designed to be cheaper than the raptor buut are now more expensive) come in service. oh, and they have problems too.

  • @TheDuvalMilitia suckhois dont use aesa radar, and they cant accelerate or climb or roll like a raptor can, the raptor has greater service ceiling and supercrusie, something that the su35 doesnt have, the t50 might have supercrusie if the russians can design a 5th gen engine, the aim9x is not a bvr missile, the aim120d only real competitor at this moment is the meteror a missile that will be fielded by our allies

  • the f22 raptor, because kicking your ass with the f15 and f16 for 30yrs is quite boring

  • It's a good idea, but the long-term survivability of the aircraft means nothing if the Raptor pilot cannot maneuver tightly enough to survive a turning fight. Stress on an airframe can be repaired at least partially, but failing meet the F-22's maximum turning potential can cost an aircraft and pilot their lives.

  • You Yankees want to spend money you don't have on this stuff ?

    The Taliban have AK 47 assault rifles, RPG launchers, and camels.

    - but no 4th generation supersonic fighters.

  • @agwhitaker This is USA vs RUSSIA not USA vs Taliban!!

  • @thesoutherncross100

    OH MY FUCKIN GOD, Russia hasnt been an enemy for 21 years!!!!!!!!!

  • @TheDuvalMilitia

    Take your blinders off or your head out of the sand or the stick out of your( Wake up man) Just because the US stopped thinking Russia is thier enemy dosn't mean Russia stopped thinking the US is thiers. Think the worst, hope for the best. Speak softy and cerry a big stick. FFB

  • The F-22 would be detected within 20mi or so. They are stealthy, not invisible.

  • i don't think B-1R makes any sense; it would probably cost as much as 4 Raptors

  • History chanel forgot to add that USAF of future is using the same technology F-14 used in Tob Gun , the unbreckable "Plot shild" protection ...

  • I can find only one word from the vocabulary that I have for this video, FANTASTIC!

  • Oh my God, so much propaganda, this absolutely doesn't even make sense. Even a kid of 8 would not believe this video. Not a single nanogram of truth in it, total bullshit. These guys were drunk when they made this video, talking about su-30mki's of India etc. At 2:16 he says, "They ripple fire missile after missile from the amraam's maximum effective range of 120 miles", amraam has 45 miles maximum effective range. Please if u want to lie, then lie in a way a proper way.

  • @dawood2u You retard, this is a hypothetical future scenario of course they would expect improvements.

  • @zzzIdividedbyzerozzz You dumb ass, son of a pig, wait your whole lifetime and you won't see an amraam with an effective range of 120 miles, hypthetical, my foot. Stop eating pigs, it is affecting your minds!

  • @dawood2u Really asshole? Bitch, we went from cardboard planes to pistons in 20 years, and in another 20 to jets. Are you that oblivious to the speed in which technology progress? Fucking moron.

  • Comment removed

  • @dawood2u and why the hell would you think I eat pigs? Figures, making assumption about random people, while thinking you're a military tech expert.

  • @zzzIdividedbyzerozzz Sorry mate, but when I hear the word America, two words come into my mind, "pigs" and "bastards". And I have sound logic for that, you people eat pigs, as result you start behaving like pigs, "If you eat pigs, you will behave like pigs". Second, more than 90% of your population are bastards. It is because your mothers sleep with the whole state after settling with one person. Marriage doesnt have any importane anymore for u. Pig-eating bastard!!!!!!!

  • @zzzIdividedbyzerozzz I admit your nation is very advanced in technology. But all that technology is useless if you are bastards, you people sleep with your mothers, sisters, incest has become your fate. You have no right to dictate and present example to the world, got it. By the way, how many fathers do you have, I mean biological fathers, you know what I mean!

  • @dawood2u awww look every one another butt hurt bitch from a shitty nation made from what we flush down our toilets. poor little bitch boy.

  • @dawood2u you retard son of a whore, the 120 c-5 version has a range of 65 miles wich is higher than your 45 mile statement. so your wrong right there fag, 120d has a range of 180k/m wich iirc is about 112 miles. suck on that stupid shit.you have no idea wtf your talking about. words fall from your mouth like shit from ass.

  • @dawood2u you have no clue as to what your talking about. you do know there are more than one type of amraam and that the range varies greatly from moddle to moddle. the newer aim120's have much longer range than the older ones. get a clue dip shit before you open you mouth.

  • @fordfan25 Listen son of a pig, an amraam of that size and weight will never be able to jump from a range of 45 miles to a range of 120 miles in a matter of 5 years, this so called hypthetical scenario of yours is taking place in 2015. You leave 2015 aside, let's wait till 2040, and you will not be able to produce an amraam with that 120 miles range

  • @fordfan25 And who u call a shit nation, we are way better than you pig-eating bastards. I admit you people are far advanced than us, now u don't believe in marriage, your mothers sleep with the whole state of california before settling with a pig-eating bastard man, who later on is called your father. You people are so sex-minded that you don't even spare your sisters and mothers doing incest with them

  • @dawood2u im calling your nation a shit nation. its a fact. yes we are far more advanced than your dirt patch of a country so suck our advanced cocks. your nation only beleaves in marriage to goats. your mothers and sisters suck goat cock in the hopes one will marry there ugly curry smelling ass's. also you all have small dicks. your females included lol.

  • @fordfan25 I have heard that in US, many men's sperm lead to the birth of children, I wonder how many biological fathers you yourself have. You people have no idea what to eat and what not to, god how do you eat that rat-like creature, I barely stop myself from vomiting when I see that ugly thing, the pig!!! This is a scientific fact, "What you eat affects your personality" or in other words, "If you eat pigs, you will behave like pigs" You people have become pigs now, you are no more humans

  • @dawood2u yes sperm leads to the birth of childern, of course your weak sperm does not wich is why your women pay us to fuck them with our huge dicks. rate like creature? you mean your mother. no i just fuck her in her ass i dont eat her. that pussy stinks of curry lol. so what you eat effects your personality...you must eat a lot of goat dick. you people are dicks. nasty goat dicks lol.

  • @fordfan25 I admit this, we are very backward than you people, we still live the old way of life, we have not become modern pigs. We have only one father, both biological and legal. By the way, give my regards to the dozens of biological fathers of yours!

  • @dawood2u you are backwards. and the fact you think some one can have more than one father shows just how backwards you are. you just upset that we are better than you, are females are hotter,our dicks are bigger and we dont worship a fucking cow LMFAO

  • @fordfan25 This son of a pig has no idea what he is talking about, such an ignorant bastard, hahaha, who told u women marry goats in this part of the world, it is your women who keep dogs, cats and pigs to get themselves licked by them. It is not you speaking, it is the pig inside you that is speaking right now. Hahaaha, couldn't you find another animal, except goat, to have a decent argument with me, you are really behaving like a pig now, it is time you really should stop ingesting that shit.

  • @fordfan25 You people have every instinct that the pigs have, you cannot think of anything else except sex sex and sex, you people have become so pig-minded that your mothers and sisters are naiiled by their so called by boy friends, and you stand and watch just like a pig, that is what pigs have done to you, it has even changed how ur faces look like, honestly, look at this video, the man at 7:15 looks exactly like a pig, redneck pig!

  • @fordfan25 And watch your ass-like mouth about our women, wat u know about them, they are holy and we lions are there to look after them. it is ur women who are in the porn business, international white prostitues, not us. Pay girls are one of the major exports of your great country. People are over the world admire american pussies, that's a fact. Infact white women are meant for porn, God has created them that way, to be nailed by other people of the world and brothers like u watch like pigs.

  • @fordfan25 And for ur kind information, we don't worship cows, it is the people of india who do that. It is good now that u accepted the fact that u have more than one father and more advanced than us, I accept my defeat in that arena. And u people have no bigger dicks, those things are called dildos, hahahaaha, your women are sodomites now, u cannot satisfy your women, that's why they turn to animals and toys. Your half population are gays now

  • @fordfan25 By the way, meet me someday, I love bottoms, especially when the bottom is a white amercian boy, with spongy, red and white bottom waiting to be pierced. Im an Afghan, we do bacha bazee, search wikipedia for this word, have u heard kandahar we are masters in fucking. Meet me, I will show what a real dick is all about, I will pound u constantly for hours, Believe me u will be satisfied, you will get an explosion in your rectum, you have no idea how deep i will drill you!!!!

  • @fordfan25 And don't give examples of goats and cows, hahahaha, it makes u look ridiculously ignorant, hahahahaha. Come with something better for the argument next time, hahahahahahaha, multi-father boy as you confirmed yourself!

  • @dawood2unow listen you multi-father bastard bottom pig, son of a porn actress, product of a sperm bank, aim-120D has a max range of 72 km(45miles), read the wikipedia, u r acting hypthetically just like this video does, far far far away from truth and reality. And after I said all these things, if u r son of a human, then u will do the following atleast 1) stop eating pigs 2) be a man and don't let ur sisters's boyfriends nail her infront u 3) respect ur mother and don't let her get nailed

  • i wonder if america is ahead in technoligy

  • Never, but NEVER underestimate the Russia's aircraft technology and especially the Russian pilots... it would be a BIG mistake, probably a fatal one.

  • Comment removed

  • 5:37 Nasonex: its weird, its very weird LOL

  • The serbians didn't pick up the F-111 on the Radar. They simply saw it because it was fliyng low. But it is a fact that stealth in no longer undetectable and right now Russia, India, China and the United States are selling AESA Radras which can break Stealth to smaller countries.

  • The F-117 Nighthawk that was shot down be Serbia suffered a malfunction that sent out a easily detected heat signature.

    Correct me if I;m wrong.

  • I worry that America is relying too heavily on the F-22. As soon as all of America's enemies adopt the anti-stealth techniques that Serbia employed, they may be underpowered against a comparable opponent.

  • @SorenityVids The Serbian "incident" is still top secret so we dont know what went down there but keep this in mind - There were F-117 missions before the shoot down and alot of F-117/B-2 missoins after. We rely on the F-22 the same way we relied on the P-51, F-86, F-4, and the F-15. It's the best we've got and frankly it's the best in the world and everybody knows it...

  • hahahhahahhahaha this is crap...the amerikans do everything to favour their ways..they are now almost bankrupt and moodys cant even derate them ..hahahahhahaha the serbians won agaist stealth...what would be for the russians?

  • Comment removed

  • every pilot in enemy formation: da fuck bruh?

  • The enemy pilots aren't stupid,they won't be confused so much that they do nothing,and I don't think every missile would hit it's target,once again,the enemy pilots aren't dumb and can maneuver against a missile.

  • lol One of those missiles costs a few hundred thousand $,and they fire more than 30 missiles in this one confrontation.Do the math,what nation can pay for that?

  • DOCUMENTRY ON F-35 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER PART 1

    DOCUMENTRY ON F-35 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER PART 2

    DOCUMENTRY ON F-35 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER PART 3

    F-35 is useless

    DOCUMENTRY ON F-35 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER PART 5

    F22 Raptor Exposed - Why the F22 Was Cancelled

    Watch all of these and you'll understand.

  • @MARTINELECA uploaded and created by russian fanboys, and no stealth is almost unbeatable thats why russia, india, and china are working on stealth planes, there just really late to the party, total propaganda huh, the amram is a proven missile system that can track and destroy any plane in the world, and russian pilots are not better than nato, espically the us, we spend more time training,more money, and have developed better tactics, GO HOME RUSSIAN FANBOY TROLL,

  • And Sukhoy Radars, or even Rafael Radars are more than powerful to detect the F-22 and brake it's stealth. Stealth that works is only in the comic books, get over it dammit!

  • @MARTINELECA russian planes are inferior to US ones, get over that.

  • @lockdown260

    thats because USA borrow money from everyone and never thought about returning it back

  • @y512516 nah bruh that's government stupidity. We just have ballin airplane engineers in the states.

  • This Video is total Propaganda! Ofcourse the Russian Pilots in the Su-30s know how to defeat an AMRAAM, and Russian Pilots are better than French. This thing is so tought-up! It has absolutely no realism!

  • although this is a hypothetical scenario i find it greatly biased and also being an american. i think history channel should make another dogfights of the future coz of the new aircraft being produced by china and russia. and also it seems like history channel was potrayin the F22 as the ultimate fighter by using mismatched dogfights ( rafale and a raptor really?)

  • wow r they gonna fight when they are both stealth

  • this is pure bollocks!. 1st,...enemy aircraft would not be flying together in huge formations, but in pairs or fours. 2nd,...B1R radar will be able to guide up to 20 amraams until they are able to lock for themselves???. 3rd,...enemy aircraft will be able to AT LEAST use RWR to detect general direction of the attackers,...if not range. At least some aircraft will get to dogfight with the raptors. BTW,...enemy don't have any ECM?. And,...f22 gets detected by radar,...although at shorter ranges.

  • Russia has now Pak Fa and Su-35++ fighters and both are capable of denying first launch capability of any Enemy aircraft.

  • @f50koenigg Wrong.

  • @f50koenigg go and search it....

  • @f50koenigg the t50 is still a prototype and will not be combat ready for at least 5yrs and the su35 is nothing but an improved su27, not capable of taking on a raptor 1 on1 , the raptor will see the su35 first, shoot first and kill first, better radar,better overall avonics set up, bvr missiles are useless against the raptor at long ranges, maybe with about 10 miles

  • yeah! yeah! yeah! at last the US technology find the unlimited life cheat code for real life. at this moment it is only applicable for B1R. but the US hackers are working hard to find the unlimited life cheat code for F-22. may be they will make a patch. btw B1R is working as a ammo patch for F-22 here.

  • BULLSHITTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT­TTTTTTT

  • OMG I THOUGHT THIS ACTUALLY HAPPENED IN HISTORY UNTILL HE SAID "this is the year 2016" OMG OMG HOW DO THEY MAKE UP STORIES LIKE THIS????!!!!!

  • @MBJCHIEN What's wrong with portraying a hypothetical situation?

  • @Xenomorphine nothing,  nevermind

  • @gahauria Research psycologists have evidence that when a male audience watches an athletic or combat scene if the side that they identify with loses then their testosterone levels decrease and they experience temporary dysphoria. American men are all about watching television and feeling macho. American media feeds them fables and lies, but they care more about feeling good than knowing the truth.

  • if ever f-22s met 5th gen sukhois in the air, lockheed must 1st: not count on simulation, stealth and long range weapons. and 2nd: No computer can override a pilot. If they're so concerned with the longevity of their aircraft and pilots, they need to give that union the opportunity to perform at 110%, even if that means a hasty retreat.

    long live manned combat!!

  • @CSLFiero You talk like Spartan, or maybe Samurai.

  • american propaganda,serbs destroyed stealth f~117 with 60s soviet techology and old modifed radar(nothing high tec).....No plane in the world is invisible just has smaller radar image but it can still be detected,even with old radars.

    New digital radaras are much better with interlocking grids that detect any object crossing the grid line so investing money in stealth is waist of money.

    And russia missile technology is light years ahead of USA

  • @srnda1389 You make baseless statements. Throughout the Cold War the USA was the side that created virtually every military innovation. Russian SAMs are not more advanced than Patriot Pac-3 or MEADS. Soviet ICBMs were always playing 'catch-up" with American strategic missiles like Minuteman II, Trident II, and Pershing II. But most egregiously, you remain oblivious to the main reason why the Soviets withdrew from the Cold War - they fell too far behind in mircroprossesor technology.

  • @ogdocvato S~400 is the best antiair,antimissile defense in the world now,at least 20 years ahead of anything USA has,patriot can come close and it needs more man to operate.Even nasa admitted that russian moon program rocket engines are far better than any american,and they both some of them in the 90s.....Mechanic is the most important thing,you dont need much processor power in the rocket,thats goin after the target

  • @srnda1389 Your comments are interesting, and indeed, they may be true. I think that educated people in the USA have always known that the Russian/Soviet aerospace industry is capable of anything that they set their minds to.

  • The B-1R, Mach 2.2 can't outrun a fighter that's top speed is 300 km/h slower than it?

    This future dogfights has been full of shit so far anyway.

  • @N1cholas240 And before that 50% degradation, the AMRAAM Pk against dumb target in real combat is little more than 50%. That's why I put the number 25%. And that had not take into account that F-35 is slower compare to F-15/F-16, the lower potential energy/momentum of the missile at lunch will decrease end game agility, considering that AIM-120D's improvement over 120Cs, I put the Pk at 25%.

  • @N1cholas240 In the analysis He posted on his website, he stated the combine tally of AMRAAM to as low as 20%. Will sent you the link via personal message, still can't post URL here.

  • @N1cholas240 For slower F-35 to stay in the air space and to provide mid course guidance risk getting into unfavourable WVR combat.

  • AMRAAM Pk is at best 50% against cold war legacy jets, by which ever means DRFM, radio white noise, chaff and maneuver, just to degrade the remaining 50% Pk to 25%, 6 AMRAAM would result in only 1.5 kills, I wish not to continue this argument, but this "documentary" is like a scripted play by the USAF

  • @N1cholas240 For the fighter to remains in the battle for the need to provide mid course guidance is the problem especially for F-35.that's what I meant for "lingering in the engagement". The "enemy" seems very co-operatives, and almost dumb, there were no supporting from ground or AWAC, no IRST to detect missile incoming, no jamming equipment or chaff, no attempt to evade, or to launch counter missile volley, no attempt to close in to the US supporting aircraft.

  • @N1cholas240 But For F-35 which lacks speed, agility and rear aspect stealth, lingering in the engagement is deadly for the pilot to risk getting into IR detection range or turn its non stealthy and hot rear aspect to the enemy while can't out run it.

  • Having trouble uploading URL in youtube, can't seem to get around it. Any way, the DRFM is automated, unless by chance the AIM-120 radar beam did't illuminated the sensor, 15 sec is plenty for computer to work and electromagnetic wave to travel. The second problem or blessing is the short guidance time for AIM120, especially when your target has supercruise and IRST, It is fine with F-22 as their high sustained speed can choose to enter or leave the engagement, to provide mid course guidance

  • the fact they call it future dogfights all well and good, the battle is taking place in 2016, all good so far, but the USAF of course are using a combination of missles and aircraft B1R that dont even exist yet, fine ok they exist in 2016 but what, the enemy force hasnt had any development at all since the cold war? Come on the f-22 raptor is a great jet and so is the B1, n the enemy forces jets rafale, bt huge problems with the comparison, how about more realistic enemy force for 2016 like USAF

  • @subzerostorm That's probably an unrealistically HIGH level of Tech for the USAF to face.

    In this vid they get as far as projecting the Berkut,but noPAKFA.So force is as real as possible.One may complain about the depiction as unrealistic because these planes are undeployed (B1R) a shitload of other US Air to Air Power and Drone Coordination from fighters and JSFs..happening right now.2015 the PAKFA will start...if everything goes to plan! Lol. Where will Russia get advanced composite metals?

  • @N1cholas240 Spoken like an Eletrical Engineer or Physicist. Thanks for the technical insight, dude.

  • @N1cholas240 ftp (dot) rta (dot) nato (dot) int/public//PubFullText/RTO/MP­/RTO-MP-SET-080///MP-SET-080-P­07.pdf

    This is a NATO publication.

  • @N1cholas240 DRFM is designed to produce a coherent representation of the original radar signal, the purpose of DRFM design is to defeat monopulsic radar; i e. it digitally record and incoming signal. Bare in mind that the maximun range of BVR missile are for the incoming, non-maneuvering target, B-1R is the later, AIM120D's 72KM vs current non-RAM rocket R77's 60KM would be mitigated by the Su35/Su30's ability to evade by maneuver.

  • Any dogfight between the F22 and any SU aircraft is going to be simple....

    F22 drops SMD from 150km. and craters the SU on the runway.

    OVER.

  • @newmanfrigan The USA has not fought an enemy of similar technological prowess since World War II, therefore it is hard to know how well the US military would fare in an all-out war against a nation like China, Russia or India.

  • Nor should we who think of himself as Sane, desire 4 ANY of these CNTRIES to Go to War with any other. It's Madness. Conflict enters 1st day 1 side or other will feel that a criticalthreshold, Momentum is crossed..the BUTTON will be pushed. Nice theoretics about conventional war! I applaud the lunacy.I know that at this time I am confident that NATO is Holding Russia by Balls but this could change. Gas Oil. Saying, however, that there are "tech. equals" India and China? Thats 50yrs off, if ever.

  • @newmanfrigan Read Herman Kahn's book, "On Escalation".

  • I'd say it would be plausible and understandable that any aircraft hit by a missile would be taken out, unless it skimmed the aircraft and didn't explode. Either way, as much as I'd hope in real life the B-1R that got hit would survive, it almost definitely wouldn't considering the missile had a direct hit.

  • @Assasin0021 I completely agree. During the Vietnam War large subsonic bombers like the B-52 were easily brought down by Soviet built SAMs. Moreover, a supersonic plane that has suffered battle damage will have a very hard time flying fast. I find this program's depiction of a B-1R surviving an air to air missile hit to be ridiculous and incredible.

  • well these guys forgot that when ever a fighter uses a radar, it gives away its position to the enemy aircraft, even if its stealth. Radiation missiles can homein on them with ease.

    Also SU 30 MKI and Rafale are armed with Missiles that are capable of Air to Aircraft and Air to Missile Role. Those missiles will be shot down even before they get any where close to them.

    Cant begin tell how much to under estimate and downgrade the European and Russian Fighters.

  • Radar emit are considered to be very low % of detection. Ones used for targeting are the only vulnerable ones, and they switch on in a low detection phasing of frequencies as well. This is an element that is fully considered to be part of the F22 Stealth Package...a so-called requirement of 5 Gen Aircraft. It's turbulence may be detected by new sensors.1 may be able to do something with that.Its a good idea but not good for targetting. Spcs classified, but enough info is out4 you 2 know this.

  • @TheHeavypanzer and you dont understand AESA radar, anti radaiation missiles are great for slow moving targets like ships or SAMS sites, but they are unproven against fast jets, AESA radar are almost impossible to lock onto due to the fact that the frequency is constantly changing with every pulse.

  • AMERICAN BULLSHIT! rafele would kick the ass of an f-22 in a dogfight any time ^^

  • @TheSwekebab Hehe. Stupid comment.

  • @newmanfrigan proven true comment

  • @TheSwekebab Show proof...haha. Sorry. Just goofy comments you make. F22 is faster, stealthier and more maneuverable.

    The rafale is a 4th generation fighter. The F15SE beats it in wargaming already.

  • @newmanfrigan Dude i said dogfight, in a dogfight stealth doesent help and rafele is way more manouverable and the f-15 wouldent stand anywhere near a chanse. EF won against the f-22 in simulated combat and the rafele won against the EF

  • @TheSwekebab The Rafale and the Eurofighter Typhoon are equal to the F-22 in a dogfight, not superior. There is a reason why the USA does not allow export of any Raptors or any of their components, fool.

  • @ogdocvato equal my ass

  • @TheSwekebab As always, we will find out when the dogs of war are loosened again.

  • @ogdocvato probably not because dogfight are so rare nowadays so they wouldent probably happen att all. the days of dogfighting is over

  • @TheSwekebab I'm afraid to let myself hope that one day a lasting peace among men will be a reality.

  • @TheSwekebab Some military analysts including one USAF general said that the Rafale and the Eurofighter Typhoon are equal to the Raptor in a close-in within visual range dogfight where stealth is not a factor. Personally, if I was an accomplished fighter jock I would not want to tangle with a Raptor in anything other than a Federation Starship.

  • @ogdocvato u know that the eurofighter have won against the raptor in competitions and they won BIG!

  • @TheSwekebab the eurofighter has never faced the raptor except in the UAE and lost, so where did you get your bs info from?

  • @TheSwekebab You spout hearsay. NATO fighter pilots are not allowed to talk about practice engagements with Raptors or they will end up in a military prison, fool!

  • @ogdocvato Yes they can ^^ they write almost everything that happens on the airforce website ^^

  • dont buy fighter jets... just give the money to the poor one :))

  • @khintonpogi Dudes like Jesus and The Buddha never got the pretty girl.

  • I guess the "bad boyz" spent too much money on planes & nothing was left to spend on training the pilots or buying some missiles. But u got to admire how the enemy planes always manage to come in the way of passing missiles.

  • @trollkiller000 Actually, thats accurate. US pilots get 5 times the flight time of their next closest rival nations airforce, Russia.

  • @newmanfrigan No disagreement there...but in any realistic scenario, the "bad guyz" will do much better than flying headfirst into incoming missiles.