i think comparing these rifles is stupid they both serve the purposes they were built for... A m16 is very accurate and not as durabul as a ak and a ak is not as accurate as a m16. No gun is perfect iv had aks jam to.. if you cant take care of your rifle it wont take care of you simple as that.
@esh325 yea i agree. im just saying an ak isnt some unstoppabul unjamabul gun they can jam but every one seems to think there just the best. ive seen aks jam up to very rarely but it happens...
in my opinion niether are the truely better than each other. each systems are better for different purposes. if you want a battle gun or something that wont jam in battle you go for the akm. if you do a lot of bench shooting and target practics in your back yard then go m16
both these guns are outstanding weapons. mostly it comes down to training and the combat situation itself neither one of these rounds will penetrate modern body armor anyhow. yes the 7.62 has more knockdown power but really in a high adrenaline combat zone u need to hit a vital area anyways to make sure there out of the fight. theres a video of a u.s. soldier getting hit right in the heart by a druganovs 7.62x54r and it knocks him down only for him to get up again and run behind the humvee
@guhudaa With that said the 7.62x39 has much more kinetic energy than the 5.56x45 so even if it does not penetrate the inpact itself is enough to kill you. Ive seen the vid of the soldiers getting shot in the chest. For one it is not clear at what range the sniper was firing or whether he was even using the 7.62x54r SVD because even modern armours struggle to defeat such a round. One thing is certain though. That is one very lucky soldier.
@riseld4 5.56 is an overall better round and i guess i can see why you think the guy is lucky but thats what the body armor is supposed to do and it worked to perfection
Cont: a 7.62x39 round is ideal for inside 300m and good to about 500, while the 5.56 is good much farther. Because if it's shame it rapidly loses energy inside it's target and spin and fuck shit up but if it fails to tumble ( usually at extreme close or far range) than your in deep shit
@XXMIT90XX true about the sights but your wrong about speed. It IS true that a good round and high velocity will result in better expansion of a hollow point however in the rules of war (Geneva convention) your not allowed to use fragnenting rounds ( maybe hollows) so if your going to follow the rules than a bigger slower round is better. But you are correct about the sights. Accuracy up to a certain point is outstanding with a quality AK
M16 is better than AKM or AK-47. M16 rounds travel a lot faster and kill person instantly. The AK-47 round travels slow and sometime the bullets doesn't hit the target you want it to. AK-47 maybe reliable but M16 is accurate. AK-47 have poor sight while M16 got better sights.
@XXM1T90XX The M16 does not kill anybody instantly. Do you call 2300 feet per second slow? And the bullet always hits the target you want it to, as long as you have a quality AK. Poor sights? Training issue.
@XXM1T90XX yeah, sure, thats because you never seen a documentary in VIETNAM, that there was some vietnamese hit with many bullets, and still shooting at Americans! FAST DOENT SAIS NOTHING! IS SMALL AND THE BULLETS GET BREAK WHEN HIT ANY KIND OF GLASS! AND AKM HAVE NOW AN MAX EFFECTIVE RANGE OF 500m ! AND IS LIGHTER, so this time AKm wins,
Lighter / equal weight than m16
more firepower
almost same accuracy ( 150m less)
more reliable
shorter ( great for close quarters is the today battlefield)
@XXM1T90XX i wouldnt say that, alot of the people who fought in somolia and afghanistan all have said that the 5.56 doesnt bring them down alot of the targets got right up after being wounded/shot
The 7.62x39 from an Ak-47 could absoloutly hit a man sized target at 300 metres, the German stg-44 fired an even heavier round with a smaller cartridge (7.92x33) and it killed men with single shots at just over 300 metres.
The 5.45x39 fired from Ak-74m is a differnt story.
With optics and a familiar user, the Ak-74m and Ak-47 can easilly be used to accuratly hit targets at up to 400-500 metres
@kaox44 at 500 yds a 5.56 would drop around 71 inches and hit with around 286 lbs/ft, the 7.62 x 39 would drop around 127 inches but hit with around 410 lbs/ft sounds to me like both rifles are perfectly useless within 500 yds, even worse at 500m
Not really, notice how most of the whining over the m4 and m16 come from the Army who only shoots to 300m vs the Marines and some Navy who shoot to 500. We do it a lot in Afghanistan, the Acog and m16a4 were made for each other and this kind of environment.
"300m vs the Marines and some Navy who shoot to 500"
I highly doubt you know anything about the Army Infantry...but if it'll makes you feel better about yourself...you're free to assume whatever you want.
hahahahahaha shooting zombies with an assault rifle ur funny a combat crossbow w/ a 6x and a 12x scope with around 500 bolts as well as a shaolin spade
@carbon0HUN no your wrong the first ak-47 was a very shitty gun the cover on top would bloww off and kill the person who was shooting it the akm is the ak47 but with a rof reducer in it and has a thicker the first ak had a dust cover of .5 and the new one of 1.0 and the akm also had bars weilded on top of the cover to make it alot more strong than the ak 47
@ashisturtwig123 I keep hearing people say that the original AK-47's blew up, but have never found any historical evidence to back it up. Where did you hear it? The top cover on the AK-47 dust cover is actually thicker then the AKM. The bars you speak of on the AKM top cover are reinforcing ribs. Because they took steel away from the top cover, they had to adds ribs to reinforce it.
@carbon0HUN the akm uses a skin rapturing bullet so when hit its harder to repair skin tissue and the bullet is smaller in diameter so the round is more accurate with less recoil.
i never knew the differences between ak 47s, akms, and ak-74s until recently. so is it the ak 47 that isnt too accurate? are the akm and ak 74 accurate weapons? compared to m16s?
The AK series is no way comparable in accuracy to the M16. The M16 uses higher velocity ammunition, and has a direct gas impinchment system. Although For urban combat where the AK usually appears, the Ak's are dominant. They are more reliable and more effective. The original AK-47 isn't actually that good. But improved series like the AKM and AK-100 series show to be exceptional rifles. AK's and M16's are 2 different rifles effective for different situations. I hope this helped.
sorry but the statistics says otherwise. o yea, i bet you tired of niggaz fuckin all yo senoritas.lol you know dey perfer niggaz nowadayz don't you. yo women all just love dat nigga dick, dats why they all laugh at your tiny little spic dick! shit even white boyz got bigger dicks, damn now dats a shame. lol weak azz lil taco motherfuckr niggaz own yo azz biiatch
lol yea well, everyone does on the internet. lol but all i have to do is just look around and see all the white, and mexican girls wit niggaz. lol just look around you lol. owned!
Yea...but I was replying specifically to aaron3378. Altho I personally experience and notice more white racisim. Blacks would be second...but that was only in one city I use to live in. It was actually on the news about a month ago. Belleville IL, Black kids jumped a white kid. It was a normal occurance there. Hands down the most racist black people I had the displeasure of being around. Whites weren't so kind themselves. Older asians usually pretty quite racist. Latino can be bad too.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
MrFrankincese,
I guess your Russian isn't all that good because the Russian commentator clearly said that both the AK and M16 are very reliable, and highly effective weapons. That Both are at the peak of their efficiency.
Anyone who thinks that the M16 is unreliable is plain stupid.
If you want to comment about a Russian language piece MrFrankincese, perhaps you should really think about learning Russian first.
I have a very nice Bushmaster AR15 that is a wonderful weapon. I have no doubt that, if it would ever become necessary, it would clear the living room, porch, front yard, and the street with ease and effectiveness. :-D
I saw a subtitled version of this and he says nothing about the M16 being reliable, but the opposite. The commentator even goes as far to say that American soldier's ditch their M16's for AK's in Iraq which is a blatant lie.
This is what happens when you see a subtitled version. You never know what is actually said. While my Russian certainly isn't the best, I certainly never heard anyone say that. What is said, that during Vietnam, some U.S. troops used AKs after their M16's became inoperable.
batlefield distance is 100-350m so the AKM do easly the job, and in close combat situations, you can use the folding stock and tactical things like m16, so this is why i preffer AKM to M16. This is my opinion, so please don't reply me with rude comments. Thanks.
the enemy, and penetrate easly, so it may penetrate the medium bullet proof vests and helmets. The Acuracy isn't the best, but, it can be added a scope and tactical lights lasers etc... and ak-47 sight can be calibrated to 100-800m AKM can do the 100-1000 job, obviously you must to be a "PRO" shooting weapons to hit at ±1000m,-CONTINUING COMMENT-
nah i dont understand anything... but i think akm is better, is ligher than AK-47 and the weight is the ak-47 problem, but we are talking about akm vs m16, I preffer AKM due the improvements, the caliber 7.62 is slower than 5.56mm but the akm makes a fking hole that had a big probably to kill
This is an unfair test...thats an A-1 M16. the A2 would pwn that ak, especially with the a2's special 556 ammo that they made for the new barrel put in the M16A2 and the SAW M249.
The AK-74 is chamdered 5.45x39mm high velocity tumble round that has the same deadly efficiency as the 5.56x45mm. The only difference is that the AK series is a much more reliable and simpler system.
i love russian guns is got a mosin nagant and if things go to plan and Obama dosen't fuck with rifles for awhile i will be buying and ak variant just cause there cheap ammo is cheap and its not going to break nothing against the m-16 i'm just running on tight budget :)....
To me it depends on the situation, if you need more accuracy and stuff, bla bla bla, then I would get the M16. If I needed power and reliability, bla bla bla, then I would get the AK. Both guns are good, and both guns are very well known.
the 5.56x45mm standard nato rd has its cons same with the 7.62x39mm and both have there pros the 5.56x45mm has high velocity while the 7.62x39mm is slower in velocity but is a larger mass which allows it to have more stopping power the newer ak series assualt weapons are now chambered in the 7.62x39mm as well as the 5.56x45 and the 5.45x39mm so stop being a jackass u stupid mother fucker.
I think power and accuracy go to the M16. But the AKM is a more durable, better lasting weapon. The 74 variants are better than the 47 or AKM for accuracy altogether. I forget which one it is, but one has a muzzle break to eliminate climb. I would take the akm over the m16 though.
The AKM has a slant break compensator (can also be used on the AK47) the AK-74 however has a large muzzle brake which is much more effective at keep the muzzle down then the slant break compensator was.
Nah dude the Muzzle brake is to establish more stability while shooting. It makes the AKM more effective of course. Because you wouldn't be spraying rounds all over the place due to the uncontrolled recoil.
yeah but that's what esh325 is saying. The 7.62 x 39 is a .30 cal round. The 5.56 x 45 is a .22 round. It's just a mm to .cal conversion. (although it is a rough conversion.)
no, the 7.62mm nato round is basically a .308 remington. All 7.62, whether it's a 7.62 x 39, 7.62 x 54, or 7.62mm, are all roughly .30 cal. (.308 as well)
M14 is good for long distance and it is so expensive and really sensitive
but AK-47 is devil on short distance is devastating but on long distance it is waste of ammo and it is cheap and not so expensive because they are everywhere on the world in 90% of world conflicts
do you mean to say that the m16 is better at longer ranges, because of its accuracy. but is more expensive to maintain and make. and the akm is not accurate at a distance and are easily and cheaply made and maintained. i just read your comment and couldn't understand your use of the english lanuage that well.
yeah i was in a room with those fuckers and it just dont hurt its fucking loud its scared the shit out of me but then we shot the scum bag in the head .but if you want distance my trusty sniper rifle my m14 opens hajis heads open like fucking zippers
that was my point earlier, This is not world war 1 or even world war 2. This is modern times. we don't fight across fields, and stay in trenches. Most warfare today is conducted in tight quarters such as an urban/suburban area. the need for long range weapons should be relegated to snipers. in this case. the AK wins. Better cover (not concealment) penetration. Better Stopping power. (kinetic energy.) I own semi-auto versions of both, and the AR jams up more even in mild conditions.
you guys have been saying m-14 over both, and I don't deny that the M-14 is a great rifle, but have you ever humped around all day with one, have you ever tried clearing a room with one? Have you ever tried to lay down a lot of suppressing fire with one accurately? Comparing the M-14 to assualt rifles like the Ak and M-16 is like comparing watermelons to oranges.
Yeah, at a long range engagement, the M-14 for sure.
But in jungle type warfare or urban warfare, I would want something that is lighter, and smaller. The M-14 seems a bit unwieldy for urban combat with a full length barrel.
The AKM is great in the submachine gun role and as a short range Assault Rifle, in full auto mode. A great rifle for the untrained and for room clearing, as demonstrated in Iraq. The M-16/AR-15 platform is good for longer range accurate firing in semi-auto and 3 round burst modes.
Fuckin' imperialists!
Alxalifate 5 months ago
i think comparing these rifles is stupid they both serve the purposes they were built for... A m16 is very accurate and not as durabul as a ak and a ak is not as accurate as a m16. No gun is perfect iv had aks jam to.. if you cant take care of your rifle it wont take care of you simple as that.
hunteraja 6 months ago
@hunteraja Yes, they can jam, but rarely if they are well made and have a good mag.
esh325 6 months ago
@esh325 yea i agree. im just saying an ak isnt some unstoppabul unjamabul gun they can jam but every one seems to think there just the best. ive seen aks jam up to very rarely but it happens...
hunteraja 6 months ago
towards the end at about 5:45 you can see charlie sheen in platoon with the type 56
cobainscousin 6 months ago 2
i think both weapons look pretty cool, but if i ended up in a war zone i would prepher to have an ak in my hands
ermaslv44 6 months ago
AK DA BEST
killerpalmtree 7 months ago
It's the Russians trying to convince their soldiers that our weapons are shit.
SD1Airsoft 8 months ago
@SD1Airsoft they are
linsluse 8 months ago
@linsluse I know that.
SD1Airsoft 8 months ago
@SD1Airsoft stupid american, the m-16 IS shit
metalmess 8 months ago
in my opinion niether are the truely better than each other. each systems are better for different purposes. if you want a battle gun or something that wont jam in battle you go for the akm. if you do a lot of bench shooting and target practics in your back yard then go m16
4everUSNavy 10 months ago
duh! the 5.45mm AKS-74 is better..
aponilenin 11 months ago
2 bad there's no subtitles! mabe i need vodka to understand ! what he's saying !
AK47AK74Page 1 year ago
both these guns are outstanding weapons. mostly it comes down to training and the combat situation itself neither one of these rounds will penetrate modern body armor anyhow. yes the 7.62 has more knockdown power but really in a high adrenaline combat zone u need to hit a vital area anyways to make sure there out of the fight. theres a video of a u.s. soldier getting hit right in the heart by a druganovs 7.62x54r and it knocks him down only for him to get up again and run behind the humvee
guhudaa 1 year ago
@guhudaa He was wearing body armor.
esh325 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@esh325 hence what i was saying you stupid fucking idiot
guhudaa 1 year ago
@guhudaa With that said the 7.62x39 has much more kinetic energy than the 5.56x45 so even if it does not penetrate the inpact itself is enough to kill you. Ive seen the vid of the soldiers getting shot in the chest. For one it is not clear at what range the sniper was firing or whether he was even using the 7.62x54r SVD because even modern armours struggle to defeat such a round. One thing is certain though. That is one very lucky soldier.
riseld4 1 year ago
@riseld4 5.56 is an overall better round and i guess i can see why you think the guy is lucky but thats what the body armor is supposed to do and it worked to perfection
guhudaa 1 year ago
@guhudaa Thats debatable
riseld4 1 year ago
Cont: a 7.62x39 round is ideal for inside 300m and good to about 500, while the 5.56 is good much farther. Because if it's shame it rapidly loses energy inside it's target and spin and fuck shit up but if it fails to tumble ( usually at extreme close or far range) than your in deep shit
Wabaanimkii 1 year ago
@XXMIT90XX true about the sights but your wrong about speed. It IS true that a good round and high velocity will result in better expansion of a hollow point however in the rules of war (Geneva convention) your not allowed to use fragnenting rounds ( maybe hollows) so if your going to follow the rules than a bigger slower round is better. But you are correct about the sights. Accuracy up to a certain point is outstanding with a quality AK
Wabaanimkii 1 year ago
first time when i see a russian firing a m16 :))
tudilautaru 1 year ago
an m16 at far range would kill an ak but at say 40 meters engagement the ak would kill the m16
100Unrealproductions 1 year ago
M16 is better than AKM or AK-47. M16 rounds travel a lot faster and kill person instantly. The AK-47 round travels slow and sometime the bullets doesn't hit the target you want it to. AK-47 maybe reliable but M16 is accurate. AK-47 have poor sight while M16 got better sights.
XXM1T90XX 1 year ago
@XXM1T90XX The M16 does not kill anybody instantly. Do you call 2300 feet per second slow? And the bullet always hits the target you want it to, as long as you have a quality AK. Poor sights? Training issue.
Southern661 1 year ago
@XXM1T90XX yeah, sure, thats because you never seen a documentary in VIETNAM, that there was some vietnamese hit with many bullets, and still shooting at Americans! FAST DOENT SAIS NOTHING! IS SMALL AND THE BULLETS GET BREAK WHEN HIT ANY KIND OF GLASS! AND AKM HAVE NOW AN MAX EFFECTIVE RANGE OF 500m ! AND IS LIGHTER, so this time AKm wins,
Lighter / equal weight than m16
more firepower
almost same accuracy ( 150m less)
more reliable
shorter ( great for close quarters is the today battlefield)
FranciscoSRO2 1 year ago
@FranciscoSRO2 AMEN brother
rheinmetall30mm 1 year ago
@XXM1T90XX i wouldnt say that, alot of the people who fought in somolia and afghanistan all have said that the 5.56 doesnt bring them down alot of the targets got right up after being wounded/shot
airsoftgunner10 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ak47 the best
armani1860 1 year ago
Ak47 the best
armani1860 1 year ago
You really can't compare them, because they are two totally different guns with different purposes
ITSbigwillystyle 1 year ago
@ITSbigwillystyle people always compare things if both are good or from rival country and besides they're both assualt rifles
8900609 1 year ago
platoon movie??
fantasma2403 1 year ago
@fantasma2403 yeah it is
mujahedeen1987 1 year ago
its a russian point of view so you know the ak is going to win lol it dosnt matter the ak will win no matter what
zyklonzip 1 year ago
@zyklonzip
With all points of view M 16 is stupid complicated bullshit
SlavaSvarogu 1 year ago
Ehhh this guy compares it like it's M16A1, jeez grow up, nowdays it's Ak-74m vs. M16A4 or M4 vs Ak-103
blackshark1984 1 year ago
akm is sweet, we used to fight turkish army in kurdistan
ramberghini 1 year ago
Can you please put on subtitles if possible?
94Thatguy 1 year ago
I own a AK47 and a AK74. Anything over 200m the AK are useless. My SR556 (AR15) and Colt goes into the 500m.
...but if I was to choose only ONE rifle to fight Zombies, I'll take the AK any day...just my two cent.
kaox44 1 year ago 2
The 7.62x39 from an Ak-47 could absoloutly hit a man sized target at 300 metres, the German stg-44 fired an even heavier round with a smaller cartridge (7.92x33) and it killed men with single shots at just over 300 metres.
The 5.45x39 fired from Ak-74m is a differnt story.
With optics and a familiar user, the Ak-74m and Ak-47 can easilly be used to accuratly hit targets at up to 400-500 metres
sheenydonut 1 year ago
@sheenydonut
400-500m? The weather better be perfect, the target is not moving and not firing back. Then maybe...
kaox44 1 year ago
The sacrifice of accuracy with an Ak-47 compared to an m16 is barley noticable.
Ak-74m are more controlable then m16 and bullets are cheaper.
sheenydonut 1 year ago
"barley noticable"
...I strongly disagree, on full-auto the ak47 & '74 are pretty much random at best. In single shot, the recoil render the rifle stability useless.
Btw; cheap ammo does not make a rifle better.
kaox44 1 year ago
Absoloutly not, Ak-74m is indeed more controlable and the round performs almost identical to the 5.56x45
The 5.45x39 has made its reputation as the "poison bullet" for a reason.
Ak-74m is absoloutly suited for engagments with in 500 metres.
sheenydonut 1 year ago
@sheenydonut, it probably won't hit nearly as hard at 300m. Most assault rifles are good to 300m.
esh325 1 year ago
In Afghan, the Taliban wouldn't engage us at 300m until 250m...let alone 500m....and they are using all the AK variant.
"reputation as the "poison bullet"
never heard of such claim, any bullet can kill you.
kaox44 1 year ago
@kaox44 at 500 yds a 5.56 would drop around 71 inches and hit with around 286 lbs/ft, the 7.62 x 39 would drop around 127 inches but hit with around 410 lbs/ft sounds to me like both rifles are perfectly useless within 500 yds, even worse at 500m
Mike11069 1 year ago
@Mike11069, Good point. I suppose if you aimed the rifle a foot above your target you could compensate for that.
esh325 1 year ago
@Mike11069
Infantry school marksmanship course, shooting and hitting 500m targets all day with a M16A2...in the hot Georgia sun with iron sight.
kaox44 1 year ago
@Mike11069
Corrections, 500m in a control environment (except the sun).
kaox44 1 year ago
@kaox44
Not really, notice how most of the whining over the m4 and m16 come from the Army who only shoots to 300m vs the Marines and some Navy who shoot to 500. We do it a lot in Afghanistan, the Acog and m16a4 were made for each other and this kind of environment.
kcimb 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@kcimb
"300m vs the Marines and some Navy who shoot to 500"
I highly doubt you know anything about the Army Infantry...but if it'll makes you feel better about yourself...you're free to assume whatever you want.
kaox44 1 year ago
hahahahahaha shooting zombies with an assault rifle ur funny a combat crossbow w/ a 6x and a 12x scope with around 500 bolts as well as a shaolin spade
masterkorn 1 year ago
I only understand every other word, English subs please.
Goodspittin 2 years ago
english subtitles? AKM wins vs m16 but ak47 doesnt
FranciscoSRO2 2 years ago
AKm and AK47 is almost the same.just AKm is a bit lighter....so AK wins everywhere :)
carbon0HUN 2 years ago 10
@carbon0HUN yep
YodaOwns 2 years ago
@carbon0HUN It also has a different angle on the stock.
SupraTompan 1 year ago
@carbon0HUN no your wrong the first ak-47 was a very shitty gun the cover on top would bloww off and kill the person who was shooting it the akm is the ak47 but with a rof reducer in it and has a thicker the first ak had a dust cover of .5 and the new one of 1.0 and the akm also had bars weilded on top of the cover to make it alot more strong than the ak 47
ashisturtwig123 11 months ago
@ashisturtwig123 and who was talkin about the first ak?i compared the AKm and the AK47.the finished ones.not the prototypes...
carbon0HUN 11 months ago
@ashisturtwig123 I keep hearing people say that the original AK-47's blew up, but have never found any historical evidence to back it up. Where did you hear it? The top cover on the AK-47 dust cover is actually thicker then the AKM. The bars you speak of on the AKM top cover are reinforcing ribs. Because they took steel away from the top cover, they had to adds ribs to reinforce it.
esh325 11 months ago
@carbon0HUN the akm uses a skin rapturing bullet so when hit its harder to repair skin tissue and the bullet is smaller in diameter so the round is more accurate with less recoil.
MrGkid5000 4 months ago
@carbon0HUN Isn't the AKM 100 meters more accurate than the AK-47
CarpeDiemAllTheTime 2 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
AKM=M16<AK-74~HK416
Adamanwolf 2 years ago
not arguments, just telling about the history of the guns... don't post stupid comments if you don't know what you're talking about
lobzdik 2 years ago
i never knew the differences between ak 47s, akms, and ak-74s until recently. so is it the ak 47 that isnt too accurate? are the akm and ak 74 accurate weapons? compared to m16s?
marleynrs8 2 years ago 2
ak-74 fires a smaller round
WaSSupYo8o8 2 years ago
The AK series is no way comparable in accuracy to the M16. The M16 uses higher velocity ammunition, and has a direct gas impinchment system. Although For urban combat where the AK usually appears, the Ak's are dominant. They are more reliable and more effective. The original AK-47 isn't actually that good. But improved series like the AKM and AK-100 series show to be exceptional rifles. AK's and M16's are 2 different rifles effective for different situations. I hope this helped.
IronLion27 2 years ago
ok thanks it defenitely did.
marleynrs8 2 years ago
akm all day everyday
TheJokerUntouchable 2 years ago
give me hk417 and i own
kiki0391 2 years ago
I dont want either rifle... gimme a Sig 551 or a G3 or an FAL
PRSpl4yer 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
shit yall white folk don't know shit bout guns. you is just a target fo niggaz!
nowstdfree1 2 years ago
Wtf, you a somali or something? Stop being a retard.
CenturyGamer 2 years ago
sure... racist pig... get your head out of your ass
PRSpl4yer 2 years ago
Niggar are my are targets im mexican BItch!
aaron3378 2 years ago
sorry but the statistics says otherwise. o yea, i bet you tired of niggaz fuckin all yo senoritas.lol you know dey perfer niggaz nowadayz don't you. yo women all just love dat nigga dick, dats why they all laugh at your tiny little spic dick! shit even white boyz got bigger dicks, damn now dats a shame. lol weak azz lil taco motherfuckr niggaz own yo azz biiatch
nowstdfree1 2 years ago
Naw Bitch The whites and Mexicans Are gonna Fuck u Niggars up! and just so u know i have a 9 inch dick and it was in and around your sister mouth!
aaron3378 2 years ago
lol yea well, everyone does on the internet. lol but all i have to do is just look around and see all the white, and mexican girls wit niggaz. lol just look around you lol. owned!
nowstdfree1 2 years ago
LOL im white you Dumbass and i HATE NIGGERS! dont even say black guys are with white girls! cause yal have little dicks!
aaron3378 2 years ago
.....lol yea sure.
nowstdfree1 2 years ago
I hate white people that hate anyone just because there not white.
clap5 2 years ago 3
Good point and I agree,
But that comment has nothing to do with this video... what is your point?
berlinermann 2 years ago
I was replying to aaron3378 racist remarks.
clap5 2 years ago 2
Ahh, ok then I just read. Sorry, but now i definitly see your point...
berlinermann 2 years ago
I hate racist scum.
TheFirearmEnthusiast 2 years ago
I'd like to put a Jihad out on them.
clap5 2 years ago 3
Yeah, though I also hate blacks/whites/asians/latinos/whatever who hate anyone just because they're not black/whites/asians/latinos/whatever.
Isn't that universal?
JortBBB 2 years ago 10
Yea...but I was replying specifically to aaron3378. Altho I personally experience and notice more white racisim. Blacks would be second...but that was only in one city I use to live in. It was actually on the news about a month ago. Belleville IL, Black kids jumped a white kid. It was a normal occurance there. Hands down the most racist black people I had the displeasure of being around. Whites weren't so kind themselves. Older asians usually pretty quite racist. Latino can be bad too.
clap5 2 years ago
he says akm is better becous its are better in water and in shits like .
suns993 2 years ago
He can say whatever he wants but he should have actually tested it.
esh325 2 years ago
Hey i dont speak russian. Can someone tell me which one he liked better?
AmericanGi370 2 years ago
Obviously the AKM, lol.
esh325 2 years ago
He use the ol' A1.
phadil 2 years ago
Probably a Vietnam war capture, maybe they had trouble finding an A2 or A4.
esh325 2 years ago 2
Which one did he choose? I dont speak russian.
AmericanGi370 2 years ago
the ak is better only in the hands of retarded or unskilled rifleman.
aks1014u 2 years ago
m16 = a light weight rifle, with great accuracy, which can easily be fired in full auto and hit the target, (unreliable tho).
akm light to medium weight, low to medium accuracy, which can be fired in full auto, powerful in close range and it's very reliable
mrfrankincense 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
MrFrankincese,
I guess your Russian isn't all that good because the Russian commentator clearly said that both the AK and M16 are very reliable, and highly effective weapons. That Both are at the peak of their efficiency.
Anyone who thinks that the M16 is unreliable is plain stupid.
If you want to comment about a Russian language piece MrFrankincese, perhaps you should really think about learning Russian first.
krazygrrrl 2 years ago
no, i'm english. and i prefer the m16 but you can't rely on an m16 as much as an ak
mrfrankincense 2 years ago
MrFrankincense,
I have a very nice Bushmaster AR15 that is a wonderful weapon. I have no doubt that, if it would ever become necessary, it would clear the living room, porch, front yard, and the street with ease and effectiveness. :-D
krazygrrrl 2 years ago
I saw a subtitled version of this and he says nothing about the M16 being reliable, but the opposite. The commentator even goes as far to say that American soldier's ditch their M16's for AK's in Iraq which is a blatant lie.
esh325 2 years ago
Esh325,
This is what happens when you see a subtitled version. You never know what is actually said. While my Russian certainly isn't the best, I certainly never heard anyone say that. What is said, that during Vietnam, some U.S. troops used AKs after their M16's became inoperable.
krazygrrrl 2 years ago
@krazygrrrl
The original M16 was highly unreliable. They chromed the barrel and made a few changes for the "M16-A1" which is a very reliable weapon.
Segasaturn95 1 year ago
He also said that for the M16 to work reliably it must be cleaned after every engagement and "god help you if you drop the M16 in a puddle".
Unit987654321 1 year ago 2
I like the Chinese Type 56 better then the AKM. It has a thicker reciever which means more durability and a heavier barrel which means more accuracy.
esh325 2 years ago
Dincolo de filme este arma cea mai folosita de mercenari în Irak. De ce? Pentru ca nu a apărut ceva mai simplu și mai durabil.
craciunioan11 2 years ago
There are alot of bad guys not breathing anymore because of both these rifles.
minuteman3 2 years ago
Yeah but lots of good guys too.
mors19999 2 years ago
yep unfortunately
stabbyronnie 2 years ago 2
but the normal
batlefield distance is 100-350m so the AKM do easly the job, and in close combat situations, you can use the folding stock and tactical things like m16, so this is why i preffer AKM to M16. This is my opinion, so please don't reply me with rude comments. Thanks.
FranciscoSRO2 2 years ago 3
the enemy, and penetrate easly, so it may penetrate the medium bullet proof vests and helmets. The Acuracy isn't the best, but, it can be added a scope and tactical lights lasers etc... and ak-47 sight can be calibrated to 100-800m AKM can do the 100-1000 job, obviously you must to be a "PRO" shooting weapons to hit at ±1000m,-CONTINUING COMMENT-
FranciscoSRO2 2 years ago 2
nah i dont understand anything... but i think akm is better, is ligher than AK-47 and the weight is the ak-47 problem, but we are talking about akm vs m16, I preffer AKM due the improvements, the caliber 7.62 is slower than 5.56mm but the akm makes a fking hole that had a big probably to kill
-CONTINUING THE COMMENT-
FranciscoSRO2 2 years ago
This is an unfair test...thats an A-1 M16. the A2 would pwn that ak, especially with the a2's special 556 ammo that they made for the new barrel put in the M16A2 and the SAW M249.
usmarine23501012 2 years ago
The AK-74 is chamdered 5.45x39mm high velocity tumble round that has the same deadly efficiency as the 5.56x45mm. The only difference is that the AK series is a much more reliable and simpler system.
death5089 2 years ago
i love russian guns is got a mosin nagant and if things go to plan and Obama dosen't fuck with rifles for awhile i will be buying and ak variant just cause there cheap ammo is cheap and its not going to break nothing against the m-16 i'm just running on tight budget :)....
IRISHMOBSTER55 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the 5.56 round is superior to 7.62. The Russians dont even use it anymore.
reallysecretusername 2 years ago
AK103
akfuttyseben 2 years ago 2
M16 it's sucks, the best of the best it's AK family
batrezz 2 years ago 6
To me it depends on the situation, if you need more accuracy and stuff, bla bla bla, then I would get the M16. If I needed power and reliability, bla bla bla, then I would get the AK. Both guns are good, and both guns are very well known.
monoBAYO 2 years ago
the 5.56x45mm standard nato rd has its cons same with the 7.62x39mm and both have there pros the 5.56x45mm has high velocity while the 7.62x39mm is slower in velocity but is a larger mass which allows it to have more stopping power the newer ak series assualt weapons are now chambered in the 7.62x39mm as well as the 5.56x45 and the 5.45x39mm so stop being a jackass u stupid mother fucker.
Popsicle22754 2 years ago 2
AK's rule and AR's drool!
TheAK47Militia 2 years ago 3
I think power and accuracy go to the M16. But the AKM is a more durable, better lasting weapon. The 74 variants are better than the 47 or AKM for accuracy altogether. I forget which one it is, but one has a muzzle break to eliminate climb. I would take the akm over the m16 though.
hogger129 2 years ago
The AKM has a slant break compensator (can also be used on the AK47) the AK-74 however has a large muzzle brake which is much more effective at keep the muzzle down then the slant break compensator was.
esh325 2 years ago
The AKM muzzle brake I thought was to make the gun more accurate and travel farther?....
AirsoftWhity65 2 years ago
Nah dude the Muzzle brake is to establish more stability while shooting. It makes the AKM more effective of course. Because you wouldn't be spraying rounds all over the place due to the uncontrolled recoil.
Shinakumiatsu 2 years ago
Power goes to the M16?! No the AKM fires a bigger .30 caliber while the M16 fires a .22 caliber bullet.
esh325 2 years ago 3
The AKM fires a 7.62, and AR 16s fire a 5.56 NATO...
AirsoftWhity65 2 years ago 2
Yes and the 7.62 is much bigger.
esh325 2 years ago 3
7.62 = .30 Cal
5.56 = .223 Cal
Shinakumiatsu 2 years ago
= much bigger
quackinacan 2 years ago
thats what she said :)
monoBAYO 2 years ago
she also said poop.
that's disgusting
quackinacan 2 years ago
'_'
monoBAYO 2 years ago
yeah but that's what esh325 is saying. The 7.62 x 39 is a .30 cal round. The 5.56 x 45 is a .22 round. It's just a mm to .cal conversion. (although it is a rough conversion.)
stabbyronnie 2 years ago
I thought the 7.62 was a .308 cal in diameter?
clap5 2 years ago
no, the 7.62mm nato round is basically a .308 remington. All 7.62, whether it's a 7.62 x 39, 7.62 x 54, or 7.62mm, are all roughly .30 cal. (.308 as well)
stabbyronnie 2 years ago
Only the 7.62x51 NATO round,
the Russian/Soviet one is 7.62x39
berlinermann 2 years ago
Actually the ak has more power in the round, but can be not as accurate. At-least some ak's.
TheProphiting1 2 years ago
0:25 epic fail in the bottom right corner
Germanboy567 2 years ago 2
akm is ak-47 modernized ..
oto2g0d4u 2 years ago
then the 74 variants
Blackguineapig 2 years ago
M14 is good for long distance and it is so expensive and really sensitive
but AK-47 is devil on short distance is devastating but on long distance it is waste of ammo and it is cheap and not so expensive because they are everywhere on the world in 90% of world conflicts
pelewi 2 years ago
do you mean to say that the m16 is better at longer ranges, because of its accuracy. but is more expensive to maintain and make. and the akm is not accurate at a distance and are easily and cheaply made and maintained. i just read your comment and couldn't understand your use of the english lanuage that well.
imnvincible 2 years ago
yes i meant
pelewi 2 years ago
AK-47 is not same AKM...
sumosami 2 years ago
pretty much
Blackguineapig 2 years ago
yeah i was in a room with those fuckers and it just dont hurt its fucking loud its scared the shit out of me but then we shot the scum bag in the head .but if you want distance my trusty sniper rifle my m14 opens hajis heads open like fucking zippers
pfcsusczynski 2 years ago
too bad the M14 is just about impossible to control full auto. And it weighs an ass ton.
By the way: did you know most firefights take place at under 300 yards?
liquidsteelwatermill 2 years ago
that was my point earlier, This is not world war 1 or even world war 2. This is modern times. we don't fight across fields, and stay in trenches. Most warfare today is conducted in tight quarters such as an urban/suburban area. the need for long range weapons should be relegated to snipers. in this case. the AK wins. Better cover (not concealment) penetration. Better Stopping power. (kinetic energy.) I own semi-auto versions of both, and the AR jams up more even in mild conditions.
stabbyronnie 2 years ago
lol the M-16 looks like it can use re-bluing
Alexn1067 2 years ago
you guys have been saying m-14 over both, and I don't deny that the M-14 is a great rifle, but have you ever humped around all day with one, have you ever tried clearing a room with one? Have you ever tried to lay down a lot of suppressing fire with one accurately? Comparing the M-14 to assualt rifles like the Ak and M-16 is like comparing watermelons to oranges.
Alexn1067 2 years ago
M14 over both.
Accurate to 800yds and more powerful ammunition. Just as reliable as the AK as well.
the1of0 2 years ago
Yeah, at a long range engagement, the M-14 for sure.
But in jungle type warfare or urban warfare, I would want something that is lighter, and smaller. The M-14 seems a bit unwieldy for urban combat with a full length barrel.
FOOSAG 2 years ago
u dont can compare AK and M14,, Dragunov vs M14 is better and Dragunov beats M14 ;)
sumosami 2 years ago
trust me i used a m14 on a haji its better thant a m14 a svd round couldn't penetrate my Kevlar vest
pfcsusczynski 2 years ago
Trust me SVD was my personal weapon in army and yes it can penetrate kelvar vest.. u know it uses 7.62x53r in finland.. bur russians use 53r :)
sumosami 2 years ago
Mate, you're 17 years old, in which army you were? Kindergarten? Or maybe CoD?
Darthzroman 2 years ago
You can be in the army at 17...
Oozyyy 2 years ago
no
not at all just be quiet you finn
pfcsusczynski 2 years ago
Maybe u need be a quitet? :)
when i was army, i üse many times SVD, and i have in civil AKM :)
sumosami 2 years ago
i am just kidding sami but my m14 sniper rifle took out a lot of people
pfcsusczynski 2 years ago
your toy m14? :D
sumosami 2 years ago 2
Why cant these russian videos have american subtitles
Popsicle22754 2 years ago
AK's rule! AR's/M16's suck!
WeisserWolf666 2 years ago 3
yeah if i point a m16 at your head and i pull a trigger tell me if it suck.
both rule
nicholasbang 2 years ago
try at 500 yrds...ull mis by a long shot
x0xErr0rx0x 2 years ago
well, I highly doubt that 1% of the people who have posted on this topic could make that shot with any rifle, so that is kinda irrelevant.
stabbyronnie 2 years ago
no u suck muahahahahahahahhaa ha hah a cough cough excsue me muahahahahahahahhahaaa
pfcsusczynski 2 years ago
What a retard!
WeisserWolf666 2 years ago
oh but you are the retard
GOOOD SIIIR
pfcsusczynski 2 years ago
Don't you have a special Ed class you have to go too?
XxILoveMyAK47xX 2 years ago
The AKM is great in the submachine gun role and as a short range Assault Rifle, in full auto mode. A great rifle for the untrained and for room clearing, as demonstrated in Iraq. The M-16/AR-15 platform is good for longer range accurate firing in semi-auto and 3 round burst modes.
RPK74m 2 years ago
the m-16 sounds nice
TheFactsX 2 years ago
Comment removed
FlashHawk4 2 years ago
Comment removed
FlashHawk4 2 years ago
M-16 hands down. AK is a good plinker, thats about it.
pittsky 2 years ago