Added: 3 years ago
From: chrysaor911
Views: 232,297
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (682)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @ddelga1234 Well, thousands of people - including myself - saw the planes IN REAL LIFE. I don't spend my time at the computer. I live in the real world, where everything is not always a conspiracy or inside job. I saw that plane with my own two eyes, so explain how that was fake.

  • Wtf 9/11 is a inside job not a terroest attack proof: when the helicopter was in zone 1 no plane zoom 2 no plane zoom three plane out of no where pluse the front of plane is showing when it hit the wtc also plane fake

  • Lol if I was a news reproter reprting on 9/11 live i would not just say "Oh my god...." I would be like WHAT THE FUCK?

  • Wicked!

  • @MrJeggus my proof. that plan had no windows. goerge bush said himself that iraq had shit all to do with this. the building collapsed straight down when only the top of the building should of fell. obviously a controlled demolition. wtc7 collapsed apparently because of heat that weakened it. but buildings closer to the twin towers didnt fall. A missile hit the pentagon because the plane they say hit it cant fit in the perfect hole thats in the pentagon.

  • fuckin terrorist....... why? just why?

  • Did the nose of the plane just fly out of the tower?

  • why is this the same picture than CNN and NBC only with different backgrounds? why is the plane coming from different directions? why does the nose come out of the other side? why can't we see the plane on the total, just at the last close up? Only questions...

  • @MrJeggus you post your proof instead of your ridiculous "conspiracy" rant. and stop yelling you just make yourself look like an idiot

  • @MrJeggus awww look at baby cry. go ask for mama's breast. when you can be an adult maybe I'll answer you until then have a nice life.

  • @MrJeggus when information is readily available online. go and get it. I'm not holding your hand. besides why should I help you when all you're doing is being an idiot.

    stop being butthurt that I demolished your ridiculous conspiracy garbage. tell your mom you need a nap.

  • @MrJeggus sure. as soon as you post your "proof" about how the jews were behind 9/11...oh wait the government did it....there were planes but they were holograms. no it was the easter bunny....get lost you freak.

  • @MrJeggus you can't google it yourself? instead of acting like a child, grow up, use your fingers to type and you'll find it. thank you.

  • @MrJeggus put on your tin foil hat, my friend. you've been reported to the proper people. enjoy!

  • @MrJeggus now I know that you're a child for sure. before I wasn't sure but now I am. If you're an adult and you're acting like this then you need to be put in a home. good luck in life.

  • @MrJeggus enjoy being reported

  • @MrJeggus post links to yours instead of your ridiculous ramblings and rants.

  • @MrJeggus like I said it's public record. google it. and another thing that's how weak your argument is conspiracy theorist that you have to say "STFU". either you're 12 and that's the best you can come up or you're an adult and that's the best you can come up with. either way it's sad. you have no argument and can't come up with anything other than: "the jews did it!" have fun being scared of imaginary boogiemen.

  • @MrJeggus The building was damaged and came down in the way it was designed to: down. That was the only reason the WTC was allowed to be built in the heart of NY. At the time they were the tallest buildings in the world and assurances had to be made that if anything happened they wouldn't simply fall over but collapse in on themselves. It's all a matter of public record but you want to see a conspiracy where there is none.

  • As far as Building 7 is concerned you do realize that two 100 story plus buildings just fell around it, right? Not to mention the debris that fell on top of it when the planes hit initially. A structural failure is the logical outcome of such an event. If you can't or won't see that after all this time then I feel sorry for you and all the others like you who would rather live in fear of some shadow organization ruling the world.

  • @MrJeggus you sir, to put it politely, are a mental case. If thinking outside the box means that I accept or entertain the thoughts of people who see everything as a conspiracy or events are the results "of the jews" then I reject it. and as for amateur footage if you reject it then you reject the people who watched events unfold outside their windows, who watched from their apartments, their rooftops. You would have to ignore, basically, everyone who was there in New York.

  • well...if there was this "nose out" thing, where did the nose disappeared? We saw that the plane flied through the tower and and the nose was intact when it came out, how it can just disappear like that. Nobody found it..

  • lol

    

  • NOSE OUT ! lol, it's so bad, no nose would survive the initial impact let alone pummel through a football fields worth of concrete and steel beams...lol  NOSE OUT

    NOSE OUT!

  • @JamesDonnelly90 FUCK OFFFFF! FREEDOM FOR THOSE TALIBAN RAG HEADED RATS! YOUR MAD THEY ALL DESERVE TO DIE AND ROT IN HELL! they will get what they deserve one day.

  • For those who are sad, Always look on the bright side of life! So many good things came out on that day! - The chinese had free body parts to cook up some stir fry, A few free fall base jumping records were broken that day, Alot of people got to have the day off, we got to kill some mozzies later, we had some light funny moments of seeing jumpers go SPLAT!!, it was also entertaining seeing grown men pee in their pants witnessing this. See!! Always look on the bright side, stop being negative!!

  • SO FAKE..lol..impossible that the bow of the aircraft keep its shape after the collision..unbelieveable that still some keep their minds that aircraft flew through the steel beams (which is physically impossible)

  • @EvilKnievel1980 Idiot.

    NOTHING is impossible. Yes, even water can burn.

    Given sufficient velocity and mass, an aircraft can fly through steel beams.

    I've seen, first hand, an oxygen tank blow it's valve and fly like a missle through a steel beam and nearly core out the block on a Ram 3500.

    Take a seat, clown.

  • @bayushizero give me a break, ass. How can you even compare aircraft made of aluminum + steel mixtures(thin layered because of the airpressure elastic shape changes) to hard solid steel tanks where layers are much thicker?? Airplane is "inside" alltrough air without resistance. Even tiny hit could damage the frames. And there is an evidence.

  • the guys like " oh my god theres another one." like it was the second cumshot or something. if i was in that fuckers footsteps LIVE on FOX i woulda been flippin like "HOLY FUCK ANOTHER PLANE JUST HIT THE SECOND TOWER!!" now this is where i sincerely consider that man, a true faggot.

  • I remember my mom telling me how she thought it was all an accident when the first plane hit. Then when the second one hit, she thought it must’ve been on purpose.

  • @nangdoninja your moms a slut

  • it should have exploded on contact and look at the first 5 secs of the vid, wheres the plane? and why is there a blank right on the collision .

  • if I was in that news room and I saw that footage live... I'm sorry but I would not be so PG rated as "oh my goodness there's another one"

  • Thats an angle I've never seen before. No less grisly, though.

  • if i were in the news room... OMG OMG OMG GET ME OUTA HERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OMG I HOPE EVERYONE IS OK!!!!!!

    p.s. not to offend anyone by thinking this is a joke this is serious fucking buisinuss

  • Fuck All musulman

  • @slavonacHR hey bro, you're the reason why the rest of the world think americans are IDIOTS

  • @slavonacHR

    id rather fuck muslim girl tha man. lol

    but serious.. were still at war- because they are still at war. With the west. With non-muslims. Go check out the site of amnesty international- see how minorities are treated in the middle east.

  • My Anutie was in the Second Plane

  • @NOAH19193 my prayers go to you...

  • Was that a plane 0:19?

  • @78772j No, that was a news chopper.

  • @LihAniaih Someone in the studio asked that. Listen again.

  • @78772j They were most likely asking about what hit the tower just then. That was only a few short seconds after the second plane struck.

  • This seems to be on purpose....ladies and gentlmen, we got a winner

  • @erisma84: go to hell. I have nothing against Islam. Practice it if you choose, but other people have rights too.

  • i heard tht when the first crash happened the ppl in the second buildin didnt leave they were not thinkin tht the other was goin to hit

  • someone says ''was that a plane?'' no, it was a giant bird, I guess people couldnt think logical that day

  • @tealmarlin then again, u have to imagine what it was like for them to be seeing that right at that second. They might have been in partial shock

  • Even today, 10 years later, watching the second plane slamming into the South Tower, shock and intense anger begins to build up inside me. I hope that those hijackers and Osama Bin Laden spend the rest of eternity roasting in a jet fueled firery hell!

  • @JamesDonnelly90 UMMM YOU FLY BULDINGS INTO AMERICAN TOWERS................YOU WILL GET FUCKED UP!!!!!!!! FUCK YOU YOU TERRORIST LOVING BASTARD

  • 0:08 Notice how he says "Perhaps purposly" just before the plane hits.

  • @JamesDonnelly90 you sick fuck you deserve to die.....!

  • "IT SEEMS on purpose" ???? YOU THINK ???

  • Oh my goodness, now its obvious. Wile E. Coyote, Elmer J. Fudd, Osama Bin Laden just a few of the carton characters that come to mind...

  • Comment removed

  • Sorry... the fact that everyone acknowledged the plane crash as a "possible terrorist attack" before the second plane even hit, or the pentagon, just convinces me more that the government DID know that this was going to happen and released a little too much information a little too soon. Regardless, it's still pathetic that after the 1993 Bombing (which nobody chooses to point out) - that the government didn't take affirmative action THEN. A THREAT IS A THREAT. WHY WAIT FOR 3,000 PEOPLE TO DIE?

  • Happy 9/11, as a Chinese I feel happy about that. LoL

  • "This seems to be on purpose..."

    Gee, you think so?

  • @CCHLsBestHockey Well at least they aren't like the guy on cnn saying there may be problems with the navigating equipment.

  • @CCHLsBestHockey  I was gonna requote what u requoted...Shirlock in the studio!

  • @CCHLsBestHockey

    It's obvious now... but at the time it was an idea EVERYONE was trying to avoid.

  • @CCHLsBestHockey Well this was live and nobody knew that it was a terrorist attack...

  • @lolusuck386 still, it's fairly obvious if you knew ANYTHING at all regarding this situation. Unless you think planes fly a hundred feet about the towers on a regular basis and something was causing the planes to drop down to the towers' height right as they were being passed, then it's fairly obvious that it's a terrorist attack. ESPECIALLY since it was 2 damn planes.

  • @CCHLsBestHockey At the time it wasn't certain.

  • @CCHLsBestHockey they were in shock as we all were....

  • @CCHLsBestHockey They had no idea at the time...

  • @CCHLsBestHockey I don't know why your comment keeps getting up-voted like it's something remarkably witty. Consider that these people broadcasting live have a tremendous responsibility to not incite terror and panic to their listeners. As regular people in immediate company can react completely unhinged with no repercussion. When you have thousands of people listening to you, you have to demonstrate composure. Could you imagine how worse the panic would be if every newscaster just went nuts?

  • @AltronHGX I know right

  • @CCHLsBestHockey they thought that the first crash was an accident,

  • @CCHLsBestHockey you have to remember this was at the start of the war on terror, we had very little reason to believe it was on purpose, accidents do happen, no need to joke about it.

  • Absolutely....

    I'm not a computer guy, but I'm smart enough to hire guys that are.

    I'm actually a retired detective from So. Calif. I 've had to opportunity to work with every federal agency under the sun. (Portions of the 1984 Olympics were held in my agency's jurisdiction.)

    all the Fed's I know don't believe there were A/C involved in 9-11 ... but talk for the records?

    No Way Jose!

    I'm told 'loose lips' can be fatal.

  • Realtime editing of video footage? Is this technology available? Yes. Why did the cameraman pull in close for the shot? I thought he would want to keep the buildings in perspective with a wide long shot? Realtime video editing software. It's been available for a long time. The plane that punched its way through the building was impossible. You saw the nose of the plane exiting the building on the other side? Really? Can an aluminum tube smash through concrete and steel?

  • @Daddyo930

    Give the man a cigar.... that confirms what folks saw was a hologram.

  • @BuckworthJackson I am an original computer man. I grew playing with radio shack tsr-80's. What I do know is a little something about physics. Just learning astrophysics now. What I don't understand is why people are so heavily invested in defending the lies. Let the cards fall where they may. If anyone in our government had anything to do with this, let their ass burn forever. We need another investigation and a peer review of NIST's shady ass report. That will shed some real light on this.

  • Oh my goodness, there's another one.

  • I love how people continue to say "this is fake/it's a fake plane" 10 years afterward while ignoring all of the amateur footage taken from apartment windows and rooftops not to mention all the news media on the ground which clearly shows a passenger jet smashing into WTC 2. unbelievable!

  • @GreatGarloo Yup....It also shows how much stupidity they have.O.o,10 years of saying inside job and all that shit.

  • @GreatGarloo

    Clearly, you can't convince these nuts unless they were there in person. And I can imagine that even then some would pretend they hadn't seen a plane. It's just so much more convenient to follow anything unofficial, however unreasonable it might be.

  • @LittleMadPyro no. not even if they were there in person could you convince them. they would still insist that it was a "trick" or "fake plane" or (I love this one) "a hologram". reading these comments it's clear that people don't understand the speed at which these planes were traveling. the force was tremendous as the WTC literally twisted from the impacts.

  • @GreatGarloo and anybody that says "nose out" or "newtons law" should be punched in the face

  • @drifter402 right. to punch through the WTC buildings the front of the planes were, of course, destroyed on impact it was the body of the plane that pushed through.

    Another thing to remember is that while the WTC were designed to withstand an airplane impact WTC was built in the 70's with the planes of that time in mind.

  • @GreatGarloo indeed. its not even the plane that comes out im pretty sure its just dust n stuff

  • @drifter402 yeah. everyone should be grateful that those planes didn't have enough force to go completely through the WTC towers. Can you imagine the carnage if that 2nd plane had been able to sheer the top off of WTC 2? Instead of collapsing in on themselves they might have really fallen over. The death toll would have been enormous.

  • @GreatGarloo well i believe it would have if it were not for bombs b. even so i hate no planers

  • @GreatGarloo well i think bombs leveld the towers and it would have collapsed everywhere. but even so i hate no planers

  • This is a terrible loss and it makes me sick :/ but 'This seems to be on purpose..' wasn't that a tad obvious?

  • "this seems to be on purpose" No fucking shit.

  • this video is oviously fake

  • Is on purpose you fuckers!

  • this is one of the saddest moments in history, and all newscasters did their best to cover it, but really? "this may be on purpose" comeon.. of course it was on purpose. But, i suppose she was really shocked at what happened.

  • what is that flying object at 0:21 on the button left???

  • Its plain and simple - think of all the amazing special effects Hollywood produces - yet on what would be the biggest mass murder and conspiracy in the history of the world, the best of the best just mess up - enough for the Average Joe American to spot.

    You are ignorant to believe that you would be able to uncover such a conspiracy by trolling youtube videos on your home computer.

  • at 0:10 you can see the nose of the plane getting out of the building so the plane is 'inside' the building but havent still exploded, now tell me how can this be?? I have seen recreation vids made by technics showing how the plane would hit steel columns and would be destroyed before reaching the opposite side of the building.

    Stopping the vid at 0:10 it seems more like the plane could get thru the building and get out of it and go on flying, its surrealist.

    They failed to stop the fake by 1s?

  • Ick. They're such terrible actors. Obviously they knew it was fake. Fuck all these people.

  • at 0:04 when the camera is zooming the plane should appear in the screen, because only 6 seconds after he hits the building. Another strange thing is none of the cameraman or crew at the chopper saw it coming, and how they centered the close view in the place where the plane hits, but not the plane coming?

    Appart from this, the video seems real imo

  • this video is as fake as anyone who thinks this video is real

  • I hate dumb new casters

  • ...but they show the plane hit before the black out. So what's the big deal?

  • i dont care how slow was the plane was going, it has to be seen from the other side of the tower.

  • This seems to be on purpose...thanks grandma

  • Drückt mal genau bei 0:11 auf pause .

    Das seht ihr das die Nase des Flugzeuges an dem anderen Ende wieder raus kommt.

    Im Internet steht ,dass es sozusagen eine Schablone in form eines Flugzeuges gab , und man so getahen hätte als wenn ein Flugzeug reingeflogen.

    Kurz nach der Szene wird der Bildschirm für eine Sekunde ganz schwarz.

    Irgendwie Merkwürdig oder ?

    Was sagt ihr dazu ?

  • Oh my goodness there is another one...Oh my goodness there is another one

  • Way to cut out the video before the newscaster's famous quote from that day. Moron.

  • 0:20 "Is that a plane?"

  • "good day NY".... wow. And also, for those who say the plane was fake, who provided the sound? Was Dolby digital in on this too?

  • The pilot must have been drinking. LOL.

  • just before the plane hit, 05-10, look above the building at that thing that moves... very strange...

  • Guys the blank at 0:11 is because some broadcasting towers are at the top floors of the WTC. MSNBC explained that in this vid

    /watch?v=LfHRUidNXmI&feature=r­elated

  • @starwarsworld this is incorrect....regardless what any film tells you....get it into simple editing software and look at the footage frame by frame yourself...as I have and many others have ....signal dropout or interruption results in an instantaneous loss of signal....

  • not only is it a gradual fade in and out over a number frames but the titles remain when generated in new year the same as the camera feed from chopper five....the on-screen gm newyork titles where not shown on national broadcasts of the same footage. A three to five frame fade is totally consistent with software applied modification.

  • @chrysaor911 Obviously the person recording this was off of cable so the channel itself would have stayed on. The Helicopter signal was going through a repeater in the WTC and the Helicopters signal is what blinked off until the UPS battery backup in the WTC transmitter kicked on.

  • @starwarsworld it also shows the noes of the plane shooting out of the building just before the blank YET NO NOSE RECOVERED OR SHOWN IN ANY OTHER VID

    5* and thumbs up me + a pat on the back and a gigity

  • @starwarsworld And that the ground shook for miles when the planes impacted...

  • The World have Changed by a Digital Fake...Why?...Because FEAR...Because Controll...Because...THE NEW WORLD ORDER!!!

  • Comment removed

  • Seriously I see no "intact nose" but overactive imaginations. Come on its like 10 fucking pixels.

    The only really weird thing in here is the plane not appearing before the zoom.

    If you believe some theory by faith -like there were no planes-, you'll find your evidence in the 10 pixels and whatever stuff you can use to support your theory. Unfortunately you'd have to forget the huge amount of different footage on the 2nd plane hitting the tower, the witnesses, the plane passengers deaths...

  • costaisrica, simply impressive O_O!

  • WTFFFF??? Why here, you can see a "black screen" on 0:11 just before the second impact, and on the CN, you can see a "black screen" just before the second impact???

  • the plane smashes into the tower and then dust or whatever it is flys out of both sides of the tower. evidence that bombs were planted?

  • Nearly 10 years, wow!!

  • the plane is fake

  • Die Ängste der Vergangenheit...sind die Träume der Zukunft!!! The Fears of the Past... are the Deams of the Future!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Welcome...to the New World Order...Fear?...Why?...Fiction­?...Was auch immer!...Wir gehören alle zusammen...Lasst uns nicht verarschen!!!

  • Oh my goodness, oh my golly, oh my gilly, oh my wolly, oh my polly !! WTF? This is devastating and these news people are "oh my golly oh goodness oh this oh that. I don't  see any goodness in these impacts do you?

  • Thanks for terminating then blocking me on facebook Chris, nice work mate!

  • @TheTodd1977 came off facebook .....no longer on there ....didnt block ya.... apart from that thought all was cool...chill out dude

  • @chrysaor911 my apologies, sorry bud!

  • @TheTodd1977 RAGE HARD!!!!!!!

  • 9/11 The Myth and The Reality - David Ray Griffin - Full Length Feature ...please search and watch this people its worth your time!

  • I cant figure out why the plane cant be seen in the WIDE shot (before the zoom). Any one got an idea?

  • @infoseeker264 it could be computer graphics and they failed to make it realistic.

  • @Dave7689 It WAS computer graphics and it DID fail. How can the Official Story claim a Pancake Collapse when the actual collapse doesn't match the Computer Model?

    NIST did the same thing with the WTC-7 collapse. They used a computer model to prove it collapsed due to fire yet WTC-7 collapse didn't match the Computer Model either.

    How can you use a Computer Model to prove something happened when it DOESN"T EVEN MATCH the actual events?

    It just doesn't make sense.

  • @infoseeker264 ill tell you what doesnt make sense to me is: why did they make so many fakes? if i was going to try something like this i would take the time to make it accurate and realistic.

    it seems they had too many people in on it creating their own manhattans that dont match the other fakes!

  • @infoseeker264 its really a missle made to look like a plane, thats how it got there so fast and u cant see it in the wide veiw, notice no windows on the plane -.- and the nose pops out at 11 seconds, no plane can survive that shit.

  • @ninjaking07 That is what I am thinking to.

  • @infoseeker264 what are you trying to say. There was no plane. My gosh they must of been hollograms sent by darth vader. Damn you 911 truthers are stupid as shit

  • @claton95

    I am not sure what it was. They have YET to tie any of the plane parts to Flight 175. Everything is numbered. It would be very easy to tell if these parts actually came from Flight 175. Why haven't they did this yet?

  • @claton95

    If you would have studied this and really looked into it. Im sure you will understand that it just doesnt add up. In order for the plane to be visible in the close-up. it has to be visible in the Wide Shot (before the zoom).

    How do you explain how its NOT visible in the Wide Shot?

    Before you call anyone stupid, why don't you show a "little" intelligence of your own. Tell us how the plane could suddenly appear.

    Come on Big Mouth. Tell Us.

  • @infoseeker264 Because it wasn't there yet... mystery solved.

  • @chaosproduction Wrong. It should have been there. Figure it out.

  • @infoseeker264 So what, you're saying there wasn't a plane there? I guess those millions of people in New York who watched it happen were wrong. Idiot.

  • @chaosproduction

    I am NOT saying that but I do think its strange it isn't in the wide shot. It has been calculated out and it should have been there. Its a mystery.

    Why are you so upset? I just asked a simple question and you have to start the name calling. How CHILDISH.

  • @infoseeker264 The camera zoomed in a small bit. The plane wasn't there because it was out of shot, obviously. When it zoomed it it was most likely right on the edge of the shot. How hard is that to work out?

  • @chaosproduction

    I understand what you are saying however you are wrong. I am not saying you are an idiot. I am just saying you are mistaken. When calculated out, IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN IN THE WIDE SHOT. Take some time and calculate it out.

  • @infoseeker264 You can't really do a good calculation on a small screened, bad quality video on youtube. Planes travel fast, fast enough to get from the side to the tower in that time. Besides I have saw a video of the plane coming in from a far.

  • @chaosproduction I am NOT going to argue with you about this.

    Like I said before. IT HAS BEEN CALCULATED OUT AND THE PLANE SHOULD HAVE BEEN THERE.

    Thats it. Cant you read? It has NOTHING TO DO WITH THE QUALITY OF THIS VIDEO.

    You best stop before you make yourself look like an IDIOT.

  • @infoseeker264 Calculated by who excatly? If you think it wasn't there then where was it? What do you think that thing that crashed into the building was? Using common sense does not make me look like an idiot.

  • @chaosproduction

    Common sense??? Yea Right. What a FOOL.

    

  • Comment removed

  • @infoseeker264 That plane was traveling fast enough to were it would have been out of the wide shots few..... stop with all these fucking "it never happened lines" my brother was there

  • @basepadz Dude. I figured it out. It should have been there. It doesn't matter to me if your brother was there or not. The plane should have been in the wide shot.

  • @infoseeker264 No, it shouldn't of been there yet. Where was the plane then if this theory of yours is correct? It didn't come out of nowhere.

  • @chaosproduction

    YES IT SHOULD HAVE. I am NOT going to argue this with you.

    That is what I am asking. HOW can it be in the close-up when it isn't in the Wide-Shot?

    It almost makes me think it was digitally added...

  • @infoseeker264 Digitally added? HA! Don't be stupid. I guess all those thousands of people in NY who watched this imagined a plane there.

    It isn't in the wide shot because it isn't there yet, it was probably travelling about 400-500 mph. Fast enough to get to the tower after the wide shot.