this is not a bad thing, especially the church thing because parents who enforce religious beliefs like that are obviously control freaks. rate this video down!
The US has among the best systems in the world for protecting children from abuse and neglect. We have family courts, child protective services and mandatory reporting by teachers, coaches, etc. This treaty, if ratified, would become the supreme law of the land and would undermine the rights of American parents to direct the upbringing of their children. Those rights would trampled by UN rules and magistrates. We don't need foreigners determining what is appropriate in America.
Returning home from Iraq to my surprise I find that my wife had slept with over 20 men and made videos of these encounters. She hid or depleted over $500,000.00 I earned during my sacrifice to better my family. The courts then award her the home and everything in it forcing me to the street. The courts then award her custody of our son who wants to live with me. Now homeless, on disability, I hunger do to extreme amount of child support due. My crime? Surviving Iraq!
@militaryvetandfather I too served in the Military. If you were a 4 star General, you could not have earned that much money. Once you tell a whopper like that, I tend to not believe the rest.
@pastorart1974 You hear a portion of a story and when it does not make sense to you, you fill in the blanks and assume a lie. If you read closer you will see that I never said I made that money while in the military. I was already a disabled vet in Iraq as a contractor. I then worked in Iraq 6 years at over 100 k per year. I had already made my sacrifices for country while in the military and if you read closer you will see that this time I did it for family. So thanks for calling me a liar.
@pastorart1974 So just in case you did not understand and I need to clarify it just a bit better, I became disabled through service connected injuries incurred during the service to my country while enlisted in the military. Once I was honorably discharged and evaluated as disabled, though not at 100%. The opportunity to work in Iraq and to put some of that military training to good use presented itself. So I once again bit the bullet 3 times for my family and made over a half a mil.
@pastorart1974 Anyway, I never received that money even though I made it. And yes I was shot three more times while there and saw a lot of good guys fall. When I got home my wife had moved all the money out of our account and the courts then helped her still the rest by awarding her the home and all that she had in her possession. Seeing how I had nothing in my possession I received nothing. My total loss was $777,043.43. And yes, I am homeless, but not a liar. Want the dvd of my case???
@pastorart1974 Wife was awarded our home that I payed off as family courts said they could not award me custody of my son because he needed to live in a home. The court then nominated me a visitor and forces me to pay $1,188.00 in child support based on what I am no longer able to make. So instead of me just being just a homeless Disabled American Vet, this act by our just courts turned me into a beggar. I am rated 70% disabled from the military, not for the injuries while in Iraq as a civilian.
@pastorart1974 And now that i only get the 70% and thank god I do, It comes to $1,298.00 per month. And you see how much she gets from me in child support. so do the math. I cannot work and the military will not cover me for the new injuries sustained for the last 6 years in Iraq, this puts me in a bad situation. can't work, have to pay high child support for a son that wants to live with me, to a bitch that took everything from me and has possibly 3 homes now. while I am on the street.
@pastorart1974 Again, I have a DVD of my entire case. All the money that was made and the accounts it went into, the videos and pictures of her and other men having sex. The courts fraud and my attorney's neglect and lies. I have all of it on a very easy to follow DVD. I can prove every last word.
The unfortunate things is that it is all true.
I was erased and my crime was making back home alive.
So send me your address and I will mail you a copy, then come back on here and speak with facts.
This is political propaganda at its worst! If this idea gets signed into law our children will be in more danger than ever! Cops will be powerless to stop child abuse if this idea becomes a Constitutional Amendment. As an American I believe this amendment proposal is just a bad idea. A lot of people seem to confuse parental rights with parental responsibilities. It's bullshit that animals have more right in this country than our own children.
@GenX6887 The cops do not check each child into bed at night. It is the neighbors and friends and relatives that need to stop children from being abused. Not the cops. At what point are we going to stand up and take responsability ourselves for what goes on around us? I do not believe that we should sit back complacently and expect some gov't agency to fix everthing. And it is sad that a dog has more rights than a parent.
@MoshmanVideo What I meant was that the cops would have a trickier time arresting and prosecuting any child abusers when ever needed. It's also our duty to report abuse to cops when it happens.
Parental Rights in danger? They've been plundered and pillaged for decades already while fathers were being kicked to the curbs and extorted for every last dime for children they arent permitted to see and many for children that arent even theirs.
@pastorart1974 IF! IF? We are tired of waiting on IFs to free us from forced servitude and slavery right here in America. Paternity Fraud / Child Extort is an illegal epidemic in this Country and no amount of bills, statues, amendments are going to fix the totally corrupt CHILD EXTORT COLLECTION AGENCY. It must be abolished and bulldozed completely. They have hi jacked the legal system and these terrorists destroy innocent mens lifes on a daily basis.
@meast36 they are all dangerous.I am a christian woman and I try to do what is right But I can't stand policticians. I am a political atheist. I think politics is ruining our country because there is no honesty anymore.they are all liars
America, freedom, democracy, and rights are bullshit; nothing new. Fuck America. Congress won't do shit, they never do. They're owned by special interest groups. That's 99% of the reason why things in America, including this issue, are fucked up to begin with. People have to be unified about all constitutional rights, not just one. They never are, and sold out politicians are the icing on the shit cake. I hate America.
Not sure who that was directed toward, but I am 100% pro-life so that argument is useless on me.
No. We do not have to adopt. You have no say in our procreation. It's nothing to do with selfishness. You're just a dumbass who pushes his beliefs on others. If you want to adopt, then that's your decision.
FYI. If you knew a damn thing then you would know that parental rights are threatened and kids are being taken needlessly.
BTW. I don't really even go to church so that argument sucks.
The problem is that there are no laws that prevent very stupid people from breeding. If there was, we wouldn't have crime in the US. Children DO need to be protected from their parents, because in many cases the children are more adult than the parents.
You're disgusting. Do you even have a child?? You think that it's necessary to take a child because of too much church?? How dare you! Parents make, carry, and birth the baby. THEY HAVE THE RIGHTS TO DECIDE WHAT IS RIGHT UNLESS THEY ARE ABUSIVE OR NEGLECTFUL!
I have 2 adopted children, both came from abusive Christian homes who were forced to go to churches that the adults get up and act like 4 year olds speaking in tongues, cry, pray and hop around like children throwing tantrums. It's taken YEARS for them to finally learn how to behave like normal 8 and 9 year olds. The damage that some Christian churches do is immeasurable and it's about time that legislation is passed that would protect children from such abusive behavior.
@ColonPal What you need to understand is there is always someone who thinks what someone else is doing is "nuts". There are those that would say any church is abuse, as there are those who would say no church is abuse. At what point is it the gov't's place to tell a parent what they may teach a child to believe?It is those who are abused to where their physical well being is in danger that we need to watch out for. It is the parents job to worry about their soul.
@MoshmanVideo -- Very simple question and I'm glad you asked. We can draw the line very easily by saying that when parents teach their children LIES or things that could cause HARM either emotionally or physically, is when someone with higher authority needs to protect the children. For example: parent teaches child that being homosexual is 'wrong' according to church. Child feels shame and commits suicide 6 mo. later. Parent should be charged with murder in the first.
Boy that line of reasoning totally isn't leading right into "A Brave New World". Nope. Not at all. Get out of your utopian hallucinations. The more you give away your rights to the government, the easier it is for those in government to exploit that power for their own end. Why do you think that this "higher authority" is so trustworthy? The Jews in Germany thought their higher authority was trustworthy and look at what happened to them.
@Ziiiv -- How is protecting children from abusive parents even remotely giving the gov. more power? I guess you're just a little paranoid and maybe you should see a professional about that.
There's nothing wrong with strict discipline, it's when that discipline becomes ABUSE that it crosses the line. Forcing your children to live under archaic and genocidal Biblical 'morality' is SIMPLY WRONG in today's society. I also don't think any Jews trusted the Nazi's for a second.
Single-payer GRAYSON Single-payer ...It would have been just too damn expensive to remove all that asbestos from the Twin Towers... As the 9/12 Tea Party looks into the events of 9/11 they have many questions concerning the Official Story. They know not to trust the Government & Media. Only the guilty fear inquiry. An ill wind comes arising Across the cities of the plain There's no swimming in the heavy water No singing in the acid rain Red alert Red alert
If you want to know EXACTLY what rights are listed in the Constitution Read Amendment #9. "The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."
If you seek a full list of those rights retained by the people refer to the Constitution. I list only those rights and specific portions of other rights that the government has the authority in which to involve themselves..
They don't make the law but, once we sign and ratify this treaty it does become the supreme law of the land. This is evidenced by the US constitution and decisions from the US Supreme court.
"Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny."
If you wish to know which laws are true and legally enforceable; refer to the US Founding Charter, the last paragraph, "We, therefore, the Representatives... do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People..."
Anywhere it proves that Congress failed to obtain the "Authority" of the people within their district, those laws, programs, etc. are not legally enforceable.
Unfortunately, too few citizens (almost no lawyers) of the States that are part of this Union do not know this.
noolemiester, I think there are plenty of laws for protecting children from bad parents. However, we are quickly approaching an attitude in this country that NO parent is intelligent enough or capable of making good judgements for their children. R u ready to give up your rights?You may be in line with the choices the gov. currently makes, but will you always? What about when u have been a good parent and your child still makes bad choices and u want to discipline them?Will someone disagree?
I am just wondering what is behind your motivation I fear that it might have something to do with protecting the rights of parents that have chosen not to be good parents . children make poor choices it takes an ADULT to step in and guide them . Then there are those adults that never grow up and I believe these adults are envious of their children . I say it takes one to know one
@Actus7 wow...talk about a blanket statement. i think that its a pretty big fallay to group everyone in that organization as a Satanist. Please, dont come across as ignorant as you sound. If they are making poor decisions thats one thing, but please dont give others a chance to use your horribly constructed arguement as a basis for ridicule against all who think that these higher organizations are making some poor decisions in these areas.
did i mention i also think kids should be able to choose re-adoption by consenting, non-felonious adults. kids with intelligent enough parents will probably not choose to do so.
FUCK PARENTAL RIGHTS AND FUCK THE TRADITIONAL FAMILY! spread the rights %40 to the kids themselves(%65 for teens) and spread what is left evenly among the state and the parents. btw, abortion is a form of parental rights (which ironically, i disagree with, even though am a far left liberal)
This parental rights campaign is just for people who want to beat their children. Corporal punishment is outlawed in MANY countries and strangely these countries also have a much lower level of violence and crime than the U.S.
Your comment is very wide sweeping and broad with no facts to back it up. Sounds like you are just expressing as underinformed "mainstream" opinion, that is freindly to the destruction of the family nucleus.
Human rights for children already exists.
Thanks for your thoughts,
even though I disagree with them,
and am used to remarks that continue show how dumbed down the sheeple of this country are,
Give me a break MrRouXRenard! There are already laws against beating children! This UN treaty cuts parents' legs out from underneath them on several important issues.
Please sign the petition and spread the word! I did. This is a serious matter that cannot be ignored. I will not stand by and allow our government to take over our family roles.
If you want to give up your American rights then support this UN treaty. It would undermine US family courts and family laws and take rights away from American parents. Please oppose it and pass the word. The family is the foundation of our nation. This treaty will only weaken America and American families.
Govt.sucks you know what,jailed me for standing up to them,FUCK them,I proved them wrong and went through hell to raise my children,almost had the guns out but trusted the Lord and He got me a court injunction against the S.S.[called social services up here,I think it stands for the Nazi version of S.S.] no wonder they are building more jails!!Never give up on your kids,GOD is on your side!!He hates those that try to hurt children[millstone scripture]and Govt. is going where NO-ONE should!!
It's very obvious you have no business having children, when you're thinking of getting the guns out over social services. Perhaps if you learned how to parent your children without abusing them, SS wouldn't have the need to get involved. You're the type of Christian moron that BELONGS in jail, PERMANENTLY! And your children should be moved to a household where there's at least one real adult.
parent may know about children's characters since their birthdays to childhoods . They belong to parent who had given their births , the family attachment stands up in their minds . But their minds can change the way by social attachment and so on .
I agree we as parents need to raise our children not our govement.The only thing our goverment needs to do is punish the parents that abuse there children. Not control how we want to raise them! Abortion is something parents need to know about,before our children get one.Get the picture!!!! I agree.
No, abortion is something that parents should know about before having children. There's a PLAGUE of unwanted children on the planet. It is up to each of us to stop being selfish by thinking of children as entitlements. If you want a child, ADOPT!
And if you get sperm somewhere it shouldn't be, use EMERGENCY contraception -- it destroys the fetus before it is more than a small collection of tissue.
We have already lost parental rights to an astonishing degree. When a daughter of 13 can have an abortion without parental consent OR knowledge, the government has gone to far. ANY OTHER medical treatment requires parental consent, but abortions dont.
As much as I love my country, I have about lost faith in her ability to recover. America is under attack ladies and gentlemen and this is only one small issue among many.
look i was give the book thrown after me for giving my kids 2 swats on the butt because the flooded my 2 story house and i recieved 3 yrs of probation and 1 yrs suspeneded jail time and now i am marked as a child abuser so bite me on the real child abusers because you dam right my kids know who is boss in my house and they know if i do not punish them for things the do wrong that i do not care and that is not happening so eat shit
Many child abusers have hidden behind the slogan "Parents Rights" A Constitutional Amendment would make it almost impossiable to punish parents who abuse their children. They can claim, they were doing it in the name of Parents Rights.
It's more government intrusion behind the slogan of "taking care of the children." Guardian-usurping-legislation would make parents impotent in caring for their children. The government can claim children must be taught alternatives life styles are fine such as homosexuality under the slogan of 'the childs best interest'.
I really do not appreciate your partisan position on this issue. Most states that permit school corporal punishment are governed by right wing nuts. Great advertisement for your law firm though.
It is truly unbelievable the lengths the judges and politicians take to dragging our country to the gutter! The liberal college professors so brainwashed their students, we will really have a tremendous fight ahead.
2. In any proceedings pursuant to paragraph 1 of the present article, all interested parties shall be given an opportunity to participate in the proceedings and make their views known.
Article 9 1. States Parties shall ensure that a child shall not be separated from his or her parents against their will, except when competent authorities subject to judicial review determine, in accordance with applicable law and procedures, that such separation is necessary for the best interests of the child.
Such determination may be necessary in a particular case such as one involving abuse or neglect of the child by the parents, or one where the parents are living separately and a decision must be made as to the child's place of residence.
Article 7 1. The child shall be registered immediately after birth and shall have the right from birth to a name, the right to acquire a nationality and. as far as possible, the right to know and be cared for by his or her parents. 2. States Parties shall ensure the implementation of these rights in accordance with their national law and their obligations under the relevant international instruments in this field, in particular where the child would otherwise be stateless.
Article 6 1. States Parties recognize that every child has the inherent right to life. 2. States Parties shall ensure to the maximum extent possible the survival and development of the child.
States Parties shall respect the responsibilities, rights and duties of parents or, where applicable, the members of the extended family or community as provided for by local custom, legal guardians or other persons legally responsible for the child, to provide, in a manner consistent with the evolving capacities of the child, appropriate direction and guidance in the exercise by the child of the rights recognized in the present Convention.
Article 4 States Parties shall undertake all appropriate legislative, administrative, and other measures for the implementation of the rights recognized in the present Convention. With regard to economic, social and cultural rights, States Parties shall undertake such measures to the maximum extent of their available resources and, where needed, within the framework of international co-operation.
3. States Parties shall ensure that the institutions, services and facilities responsible for the care or protection of children shall conform with the standards established by competent authorities, particularly in the areas of safety, health, in the number and suitability of their staff, as well as competent supervision.
2. States Parties undertake to ensure the child such protection and care as is necessary for his or her well-being, taking into account the rights and duties of his or her parents, legal guardians, or other individuals legally responsible for him or her, and, to this end, shall take all appropriate legislative and administrative measures.
Article 3 1. In all actions concerning children, whether undertaken by public or private social welfare institutions, courts of law, administrative authorities or legislative bodies, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration.
2. States Parties shall take all appropriate measures to ensure that the child is protected against all forms of discrimination or punishment on the basis of the status, activities, expressed opinions, or beliefs of the child's parents, legal guardians, or family members.
Article 2 1. States Parties shall respect and ensure the rights set forth in the present Convention to each child within their jurisdiction without discrimination of any kind, irrespective of the child's or his or her parent's or legal guardian's race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national, ethnic or social origin, property, disability, birth or other status.
Article 1 For the purposes of the present Convention, a child means every human being below the age of eighteen years unless under the law applicable to the child, majority is attained earlier.
These assholes want the right to abuse children. well you cant have it! children are people, and american children do in fact have constitutional rights. These assholes want to take children's rights away. It's against the law for your boss at work to spank you on the ass every time they want your undivided attention. But these fuckhead child abusing religious fanatics think they have the right to abuse their children. This asshole, and his sheople followers, are a disgrace to humanity.
Spanking is not inherently abusive. The relationship between an employer and an employee and a parent and a (sometimes pre-verbal) child aren't the same and drawing analogies between them is nonsensical.
The reason I used a boss vs parent, they each teach you your job, you dont want your boss slapping your ass to get your attention or when you do something wrong, in fact it's against the law, bec of the constitution, so at what age do children have constitutional rights? get it now chump?
Hitting, in the appropriate circumstances *is* a form of teaching.
There is no constitutional provision against being hit on the rear, at any age. It's against the law for employers to do so, but that has nothing to do with the Constitution. You have your facts wrong.
you teach it's okay for mommy to hit, but not the child. Typical hypocrite, you accomplish nothing, crime is on the rise, everyone spanks/hits. You have no argument. You running out of option either from no patients are lack of parenting skills/education, so you have to bully those smaller than you, that you wish to control like robots. My guess is you dont even have any kids.
You can tech a child with out hurting them physically, means you are the problem, not the child, however your child with most likely continue the cycle of ignorance
I do agree that spanking a child because of one's own inability to control one's emotions or impulses is wrong and counter-productive. I do not, however, believe that corporal punishment administered in a clear, calm, patient manner is at all wrong.
Also, Singapore has a very low crime rate and a culture that is very in favor of spanking. That does not imply that one caused the other, however, it does indicate that spanking and well behaved children and adults can coexist.
Of course not. I'm just amused that you're still failing to come up with a citation - that's a fancy word for a quote - from the Constitution that has anything to do with corporal punishment.
I dont believe corporal punishment is mentioned in the constitution. I do believe that supreme court has ruled in favor, but their are laws if it;s done to the extreme. You know this, I know this. But my point is what protects your personal liberties, should also protect those of a child, meaning children have the same rights. What's next, you gonna cite the bible? lol
//Has far as voting age, and age to have guns, each has varied in different states, and each have changed. //
Yes, but you allowed your children these rights as soon as they were born, right? After all, you think children and adults should have the same rights...
So you're proposing that if the aforementioned "love and understanding, disapline, structure, stability, etc" are provided, the child will never decide to go ahead and ignore the rules anyway? I have a hard time believing that.
You say that it's possible to "teach" without hitting. Certainly it is, however, spanking is reserved for when the child has been clearly and thoroughly taught what they should do, and has chosen to ignore what they have been taught.
@Ziiiv -- Spanking children only teaches them that violence is ok if you're angry enough. Any parent who has to hit his child to get them to change behavior is automatically a bad parent. If you have to HIT your child to get his attention, you've likely already failed as a parent.
A good parent can make his child listen and obey without touching them. That is where the real parenting skill comes in.
Children can and do cross the line in ways that are in no way the parents' fault. Just because you tell them not to lie and show them how not to lie doesn't mean they won't lie anyway. When and if that happens a stern talking to is not enough.
@Ziiiv -- Then I guess you have problem kids who are obviously out of control already. Taking away privileges works wonders when getting them to comply with reason. I believe that children who lie are almost always doing so because they learned it in their home or didn't have consistent discipline.
Parenting must be vigilant for best results -- kids won't lie if they know doing so will cause them to lose privileges.
The reason the relationships are different is because the difference between employee and employer is less. The employee is an adult, or at least in his/her late teens - they are at a more mature stage in their development, and thus, their interactions will be different in character.
corporations have the 14th amendment rights yet the parents dont? something has to be done as the state is allowed to let the kids run while for the money yet the suffer from projection in the acusations of the parents who they speak ill of to the kids.
This organization is working to protect parental rights. Go to their web site, read what they have to say, and you can help keep government out of our homes!
@Ziiiv then your not a good parent if you cant reason with your child
gorillas400 1 month ago
this is not a bad thing, especially the church thing because parents who enforce religious beliefs like that are obviously control freaks. rate this video down!
gorillas400 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ONCE UPON A TIME AGO THEY SAID
WHAT THEY WERE DOING TO MY DAD
WAS IN MY BEST INTEREST. . .THEY FUCKING LIED.
We know what you have been doing to our fathers
in your corrupt family courts you sick mother fuckers.
classaction666 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
See the Utimate Documentry on Assult of Parental RIghts See
on youtube Deconstructing America
pearl6570 6 months ago
The US has among the best systems in the world for protecting children from abuse and neglect. We have family courts, child protective services and mandatory reporting by teachers, coaches, etc. This treaty, if ratified, would become the supreme law of the land and would undermine the rights of American parents to direct the upbringing of their children. Those rights would trampled by UN rules and magistrates. We don't need foreigners determining what is appropriate in America.
Clammypollack 7 months ago
I was moved. Please contact me. I would love to feature someone from the organization.
Sonia Denice
Chow-E-Chowz Expressions
SoniaDenice91 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CUSTODY CREATES SUB-CLASS CITIZENS WITH DIMINISHED RIGHTS
These People Are Perverts & Criminals Who Enjoy The Wages & Benefits
of Legalized Child Trafficking In The Courts Making Merchandise of Children.
All These Criminals Do Is Modify Their Crimes Like The Word 'Dead Beat'
A Modified Version of The Word 'Nigger' Written In The Back of A Bus.
Just Because Your Skin Is White Does Not Make You A Better Person,
And Just Because You Have A Uterus Does Not Make You A Better Parent.
44AlphaMale44 9 months ago
Returning home from Iraq to my surprise I find that my wife had slept with over 20 men and made videos of these encounters. She hid or depleted over $500,000.00 I earned during my sacrifice to better my family. The courts then award her the home and everything in it forcing me to the street. The courts then award her custody of our son who wants to live with me. Now homeless, on disability, I hunger do to extreme amount of child support due. My crime? Surviving Iraq!
militaryvetandfather 1 year ago
@militaryvetandfather I too served in the Military. If you were a 4 star General, you could not have earned that much money. Once you tell a whopper like that, I tend to not believe the rest.
pastorart1974 10 months ago
@pastorart1974 You hear a portion of a story and when it does not make sense to you, you fill in the blanks and assume a lie. If you read closer you will see that I never said I made that money while in the military. I was already a disabled vet in Iraq as a contractor. I then worked in Iraq 6 years at over 100 k per year. I had already made my sacrifices for country while in the military and if you read closer you will see that this time I did it for family. So thanks for calling me a liar.
militaryvetandfather 10 months ago
@pastorart1974 So just in case you did not understand and I need to clarify it just a bit better, I became disabled through service connected injuries incurred during the service to my country while enlisted in the military. Once I was honorably discharged and evaluated as disabled, though not at 100%. The opportunity to work in Iraq and to put some of that military training to good use presented itself. So I once again bit the bullet 3 times for my family and made over a half a mil.
militaryvetandfather 10 months ago
@pastorart1974 Anyway, I never received that money even though I made it. And yes I was shot three more times while there and saw a lot of good guys fall. When I got home my wife had moved all the money out of our account and the courts then helped her still the rest by awarding her the home and all that she had in her possession. Seeing how I had nothing in my possession I received nothing. My total loss was $777,043.43. And yes, I am homeless, but not a liar. Want the dvd of my case???
militaryvetandfather 10 months ago
@pastorart1974 Wife was awarded our home that I payed off as family courts said they could not award me custody of my son because he needed to live in a home. The court then nominated me a visitor and forces me to pay $1,188.00 in child support based on what I am no longer able to make. So instead of me just being just a homeless Disabled American Vet, this act by our just courts turned me into a beggar. I am rated 70% disabled from the military, not for the injuries while in Iraq as a civilian.
militaryvetandfather 10 months ago
@pastorart1974 And now that i only get the 70% and thank god I do, It comes to $1,298.00 per month. And you see how much she gets from me in child support. so do the math. I cannot work and the military will not cover me for the new injuries sustained for the last 6 years in Iraq, this puts me in a bad situation. can't work, have to pay high child support for a son that wants to live with me, to a bitch that took everything from me and has possibly 3 homes now. while I am on the street.
militaryvetandfather 10 months ago
@pastorart1974 Again, I have a DVD of my entire case. All the money that was made and the accounts it went into, the videos and pictures of her and other men having sex. The courts fraud and my attorney's neglect and lies. I have all of it on a very easy to follow DVD. I can prove every last word.
The unfortunate things is that it is all true.
I was erased and my crime was making back home alive.
So send me your address and I will mail you a copy, then come back on here and speak with facts.
militaryvetandfather 10 months ago
what about if your right have been tooken.
RigamortisGardless 1 year ago
This is political propaganda at its worst! If this idea gets signed into law our children will be in more danger than ever! Cops will be powerless to stop child abuse if this idea becomes a Constitutional Amendment. As an American I believe this amendment proposal is just a bad idea. A lot of people seem to confuse parental rights with parental responsibilities. It's bullshit that animals have more right in this country than our own children.
GenX6887 1 year ago
@GenX6887 The cops do not check each child into bed at night. It is the neighbors and friends and relatives that need to stop children from being abused. Not the cops. At what point are we going to stand up and take responsability ourselves for what goes on around us? I do not believe that we should sit back complacently and expect some gov't agency to fix everthing. And it is sad that a dog has more rights than a parent.
MoshmanVideo 10 months ago
@MoshmanVideo What I meant was that the cops would have a trickier time arresting and prosecuting any child abusers when ever needed. It's also our duty to report abuse to cops when it happens.
GenX6887 10 months ago
@MoshmanVideo It's sad when animals have more rights than any and all human beings general. And when their more regarded over human beings.
GenX6887 10 months ago
Take a look:
I need your feedback....it's important! (for children protection!)
youtube.com/watch?v=48saXiJE9Mg
Thanks!
aweinsto 1 year ago
I didint like my parents that much and I mean not at all but that is fucked up.
Splangy1 1 year ago
Fuck the U.N. !! Shoot blue helmets!
fuckyouobama1 1 year ago
The people who think they will enforce these laws and the U.N. can KISS MY AMERICAN ASS.
-TEW
theeastwatch 1 year ago 2
@theeastwatch You know it!!
fuckyouobama1 1 year ago
@fuckyouobama1 TY. surprised it took 14hrs to get a hell yeah on that one.
-TEW
theeastwatch 1 year ago
@theeastwatch AMEN!
LokitheCajun 11 months ago
Parental Rights in danger? They've been plundered and pillaged for decades already while fathers were being kicked to the curbs and extorted for every last dime for children they arent permitted to see and many for children that arent even theirs.
atmdaddy 1 year ago
@atmdaddy If the Parental Rights Amendment is passed, it will help, not hurt, the situations Dads face in divorce court.
pastorart1974 10 months ago
@pastorart1974 IF! IF? We are tired of waiting on IFs to free us from forced servitude and slavery right here in America. Paternity Fraud / Child Extort is an illegal epidemic in this Country and no amount of bills, statues, amendments are going to fix the totally corrupt CHILD EXTORT COLLECTION AGENCY. It must be abolished and bulldozed completely. They have hi jacked the legal system and these terrorists destroy innocent mens lifes on a daily basis.
atmdaddy 6 months ago
The leftists in the US government would love nothing more than to surrender our sovereign laws to the whim of the UN. The UN is dangerous.
meast36 1 year ago
@meast36 they are all dangerous.I am a christian woman and I try to do what is right But I can't stand policticians. I am a political atheist. I think politics is ruining our country because there is no honesty anymore.they are all liars
Myredeemeriscoming 1 year ago
America, freedom, democracy, and rights are bullshit; nothing new. Fuck America. Congress won't do shit, they never do. They're owned by special interest groups. That's 99% of the reason why things in America, including this issue, are fucked up to begin with. People have to be unified about all constitutional rights, not just one. They never are, and sold out politicians are the icing on the shit cake. I hate America.
BillofRightsBrutus 1 year ago
BTW. Damn straight we're entitled to procreate. Thank god there's nothing anyone can do to stop us :)
mariowedding 2 years ago
Not sure who that was directed toward, but I am 100% pro-life so that argument is useless on me.
No. We do not have to adopt. You have no say in our procreation. It's nothing to do with selfishness. You're just a dumbass who pushes his beliefs on others. If you want to adopt, then that's your decision.
FYI. If you knew a damn thing then you would know that parental rights are threatened and kids are being taken needlessly.
BTW. I don't really even go to church so that argument sucks.
mariowedding 2 years ago
PLEASE, if you need to understand this... search youtube for: Dr. Stephen Baskerville The War on Fatherhood
corbyworld5 2 years ago
The problem is that there are no laws that prevent very stupid people from breeding. If there was, we wouldn't have crime in the US. Children DO need to be protected from their parents, because in many cases the children are more adult than the parents.
ColonPal 2 years ago
You're disgusting. Do you even have a child?? You think that it's necessary to take a child because of too much church?? How dare you! Parents make, carry, and birth the baby. THEY HAVE THE RIGHTS TO DECIDE WHAT IS RIGHT UNLESS THEY ARE ABUSIVE OR NEGLECTFUL!
mariowedding 2 years ago
I have 2 adopted children, both came from abusive Christian homes who were forced to go to churches that the adults get up and act like 4 year olds speaking in tongues, cry, pray and hop around like children throwing tantrums. It's taken YEARS for them to finally learn how to behave like normal 8 and 9 year olds. The damage that some Christian churches do is immeasurable and it's about time that legislation is passed that would protect children from such abusive behavior.
DEAL with it!
ColonPal 2 years ago
@ColonPal What you need to understand is there is always someone who thinks what someone else is doing is "nuts". There are those that would say any church is abuse, as there are those who would say no church is abuse. At what point is it the gov't's place to tell a parent what they may teach a child to believe?It is those who are abused to where their physical well being is in danger that we need to watch out for. It is the parents job to worry about their soul.
MoshmanVideo 10 months ago
@MoshmanVideo -- Very simple question and I'm glad you asked. We can draw the line very easily by saying that when parents teach their children LIES or things that could cause HARM either emotionally or physically, is when someone with higher authority needs to protect the children. For example: parent teaches child that being homosexual is 'wrong' according to church. Child feels shame and commits suicide 6 mo. later. Parent should be charged with murder in the first.
Hope that answers.
ColonPal 10 months ago
@ColonPal
Boy that line of reasoning totally isn't leading right into "A Brave New World". Nope. Not at all. Get out of your utopian hallucinations. The more you give away your rights to the government, the easier it is for those in government to exploit that power for their own end. Why do you think that this "higher authority" is so trustworthy? The Jews in Germany thought their higher authority was trustworthy and look at what happened to them.
Ziiiv 10 months ago
@Ziiiv -- How is protecting children from abusive parents even remotely giving the gov. more power? I guess you're just a little paranoid and maybe you should see a professional about that.
There's nothing wrong with strict discipline, it's when that discipline becomes ABUSE that it crosses the line. Forcing your children to live under archaic and genocidal Biblical 'morality' is SIMPLY WRONG in today's society. I also don't think any Jews trusted the Nazi's for a second.
ColonPal 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ryanshaunkelly 2 years ago
If you want to know EXACTLY what rights are listed in the Constitution Read Amendment #9. "The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."
If you seek a full list of those rights retained by the people refer to the Constitution. I list only those rights and specific portions of other rights that the government has the authority in which to involve themselves..
Is that so difficult to understand?
Kingery4President 2 years ago
The UN has no say as to what laws are made in my country. I mean since when are we "subject to" the UN?
The UN is unAmerican.
VictoriaWarrior 2 years ago 2
When we enter into an International Treaty. That is what the UN Treaty on the Rights of the Child is. Do your research. This is a real threat.
sacreasy 2 years ago 6
@sacreasy -- It's only a threat to parents who are trying to get away with abusing their children. So, I guess you're a child-abuser?
ColonPal 10 months ago
They don't make the law but, once we sign and ratify this treaty it does become the supreme law of the land. This is evidenced by the US constitution and decisions from the US Supreme court.
"Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny."
Thomas Jefferson
WarDog229A 2 years ago 2
If you wish to know which laws are true and legally enforceable; refer to the US Founding Charter, the last paragraph, "We, therefore, the Representatives... do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People..."
Anywhere it proves that Congress failed to obtain the "Authority" of the people within their district, those laws, programs, etc. are not legally enforceable.
Unfortunately, too few citizens (almost no lawyers) of the States that are part of this Union do not know this.
Kingery4President 2 years ago
noolemiester, I think there are plenty of laws for protecting children from bad parents. However, we are quickly approaching an attitude in this country that NO parent is intelligent enough or capable of making good judgements for their children. R u ready to give up your rights?You may be in line with the choices the gov. currently makes, but will you always? What about when u have been a good parent and your child still makes bad choices and u want to discipline them?Will someone disagree?
tgood27 2 years ago 2
I am just wondering what is behind your motivation I fear that it might have something to do with protecting the rights of parents that have chosen not to be good parents . children make poor choices it takes an ADULT to step in and guide them . Then there are those adults that never grow up and I believe these adults are envious of their children . I say it takes one to know one
noolemiester 2 years ago
the United Nations are a bunch of Satanists....so to are the judges of the United States who side with the U.N.
Be rest assured, the U.N will have it's way....but God will deal with those people on judgement day.
No man-made effort will counter the prophecy that ushers in the Anti-Christ....& the new world order.
Actus7 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this is way paternal rights are stupid... they will make more people like you
deraickripper 2 years ago
@Actus7 wow...talk about a blanket statement. i think that its a pretty big fallay to group everyone in that organization as a Satanist. Please, dont come across as ignorant as you sound. If they are making poor decisions thats one thing, but please dont give others a chance to use your horribly constructed arguement as a basis for ridicule against all who think that these higher organizations are making some poor decisions in these areas.
drumtilludrop610 1 year ago
did i mention i also think kids should be able to choose re-adoption by consenting, non-felonious adults. kids with intelligent enough parents will probably not choose to do so.
Kalahridudex 2 years ago
FUCK PARENTAL RIGHTS AND FUCK THE TRADITIONAL FAMILY! spread the rights %40 to the kids themselves(%65 for teens) and spread what is left evenly among the state and the parents. btw, abortion is a form of parental rights (which ironically, i disagree with, even though am a far left liberal)
Kalahridudex 2 years ago
Human rights for children PLEASE!
This parental rights campaign is just for people who want to beat their children. Corporal punishment is outlawed in MANY countries and strangely these countries also have a much lower level of violence and crime than the U.S.
MrRouXRenard 2 years ago
Your comment is very wide sweeping and broad with no facts to back it up. Sounds like you are just expressing as underinformed "mainstream" opinion, that is freindly to the destruction of the family nucleus.
Human rights for children already exists.
Thanks for your thoughts,
even though I disagree with them,
and am used to remarks that continue show how dumbed down the sheeple of this country are,
John Potter
johnnyutahforronpaul 2 years ago
Comment removed
bmogie 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Give me a break MrRouXRenard! There are already laws against beating children! This UN treaty cuts parents' legs out from underneath them on several important issues.
bmogie 2 years ago
Please sign the petition and spread the word! I did. This is a serious matter that cannot be ignored. I will not stand by and allow our government to take over our family roles.
ACravinhos 2 years ago 4
If you want to give up your American rights then support this UN treaty. It would undermine US family courts and family laws and take rights away from American parents. Please oppose it and pass the word. The family is the foundation of our nation. This treaty will only weaken America and American families.
Clammypollack 2 years ago
This is so scary. What is happening to our nation? We are being attacked from all ends!
mimi0863 2 years ago 3
Everyone act and pray.
hopejoypeacefreedom 3 years ago 2
Govt.sucks you know what,jailed me for standing up to them,FUCK them,I proved them wrong and went through hell to raise my children,almost had the guns out but trusted the Lord and He got me a court injunction against the S.S.[called social services up here,I think it stands for the Nazi version of S.S.] no wonder they are building more jails!!Never give up on your kids,GOD is on your side!!He hates those that try to hurt children[millstone scripture]and Govt. is going where NO-ONE should!!
lonewolf1264 3 years ago
Amen
hopejoypeacefreedom 3 years ago
It's very obvious you have no business having children, when you're thinking of getting the guns out over social services. Perhaps if you learned how to parent your children without abusing them, SS wouldn't have the need to get involved. You're the type of Christian moron that BELONGS in jail, PERMANENTLY! And your children should be moved to a household where there's at least one real adult.
ColonPal 2 years ago 2
parent may know about children's characters since their birthdays to childhoods . They belong to parent who had given their births , the family attachment stands up in their minds . But their minds can change the way by social attachment and so on .
nutier
nutier 3 years ago
I agree we as parents need to raise our children not our govement.The only thing our goverment needs to do is punish the parents that abuse there children. Not control how we want to raise them! Abortion is something parents need to know about,before our children get one.Get the picture!!!! I agree.
koolguy1472 3 years ago
No, abortion is something that parents should know about before having children. There's a PLAGUE of unwanted children on the planet. It is up to each of us to stop being selfish by thinking of children as entitlements. If you want a child, ADOPT!
And if you get sperm somewhere it shouldn't be, use EMERGENCY contraception -- it destroys the fetus before it is more than a small collection of tissue.
ColonPal 2 years ago
We have already lost parental rights to an astonishing degree. When a daughter of 13 can have an abortion without parental consent OR knowledge, the government has gone to far. ANY OTHER medical treatment requires parental consent, but abortions dont.
As much as I love my country, I have about lost faith in her ability to recover. America is under attack ladies and gentlemen and this is only one small issue among many.
ProphecyChannel 3 years ago
Clarification:
YES
Support the Parental Rights Amendment !!
NO
to UN Convention On the Rights of the Child
kkkkkkatherine 3 years ago 3
look i was give the book thrown after me for giving my kids 2 swats on the butt because the flooded my 2 story house and i recieved 3 yrs of probation and 1 yrs suspeneded jail time and now i am marked as a child abuser so bite me on the real child abusers because you dam right my kids know who is boss in my house and they know if i do not punish them for things the do wrong that i do not care and that is not happening so eat shit
doniecurry 3 years ago
Many child abusers have hidden behind the slogan "Parents Rights" A Constitutional Amendment would make it almost impossiable to punish parents who abuse their children. They can claim, they were doing it in the name of Parents Rights.
MagnumSerpentine 3 years ago
It's more government intrusion behind the slogan of "taking care of the children." Guardian-usurping-legislation would make parents impotent in caring for their children. The government can claim children must be taught alternatives life styles are fine such as homosexuality under the slogan of 'the childs best interest'.
VirtuousRedux 3 years ago 4
I really do not appreciate your partisan position on this issue. Most states that permit school corporal punishment are governed by right wing nuts. Great advertisement for your law firm though.
IndieArtistChaz 3 years ago
CPS is destroying children and families all over the world - they are criminals who abuse children.
Tarchomraicer 3 years ago
Was David B. Oberholtzer of San Diego Family Court the judge that ordered the parents to have the child attend church only once a week?
fraudbusteralert 3 years ago
It is truly unbelievable the lengths the judges and politicians take to dragging our country to the gutter! The liberal college professors so brainwashed their students, we will really have a tremendous fight ahead.
SantaCruzProLife 3 years ago
and so on, yeah these seem really bad!
meandogsarescary 3 years ago
2. In any proceedings pursuant to paragraph 1 of the present article, all interested parties shall be given an opportunity to participate in the proceedings and make their views known.
meandogsarescary 3 years ago
Article 9 1. States Parties shall ensure that a child shall not be separated from his or her parents against their will, except when competent authorities subject to judicial review determine, in accordance with applicable law and procedures, that such separation is necessary for the best interests of the child.
meandogsarescary 3 years ago
Such determination may be necessary in a particular case such as one involving abuse or neglect of the child by the parents, or one where the parents are living separately and a decision must be made as to the child's place of residence.
meandogsarescary 3 years ago
Article 7 1. The child shall be registered immediately after birth and shall have the right from birth to a name, the right to acquire a nationality and. as far as possible, the right to know and be cared for by his or her parents. 2. States Parties shall ensure the implementation of these rights in accordance with their national law and their obligations under the relevant international instruments in this field, in particular where the child would otherwise be stateless.
meandogsarescary 3 years ago
Article 6 1. States Parties recognize that every child has the inherent right to life. 2. States Parties shall ensure to the maximum extent possible the survival and development of the child.
meandogsarescary 3 years ago
Article 5
States Parties shall respect the responsibilities, rights and duties of parents or, where applicable, the members of the extended family or community as provided for by local custom, legal guardians or other persons legally responsible for the child, to provide, in a manner consistent with the evolving capacities of the child, appropriate direction and guidance in the exercise by the child of the rights recognized in the present Convention.
meandogsarescary 3 years ago
Article 4 States Parties shall undertake all appropriate legislative, administrative, and other measures for the implementation of the rights recognized in the present Convention. With regard to economic, social and cultural rights, States Parties shall undertake such measures to the maximum extent of their available resources and, where needed, within the framework of international co-operation.
meandogsarescary 3 years ago
3. States Parties shall ensure that the institutions, services and facilities responsible for the care or protection of children shall conform with the standards established by competent authorities, particularly in the areas of safety, health, in the number and suitability of their staff, as well as competent supervision.
meandogsarescary 3 years ago
2. States Parties undertake to ensure the child such protection and care as is necessary for his or her well-being, taking into account the rights and duties of his or her parents, legal guardians, or other individuals legally responsible for him or her, and, to this end, shall take all appropriate legislative and administrative measures.
meandogsarescary 3 years ago
Article 3 1. In all actions concerning children, whether undertaken by public or private social welfare institutions, courts of law, administrative authorities or legislative bodies, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration.
meandogsarescary 3 years ago
2. States Parties shall take all appropriate measures to ensure that the child is protected against all forms of discrimination or punishment on the basis of the status, activities, expressed opinions, or beliefs of the child's parents, legal guardians, or family members.
meandogsarescary 3 years ago
Article 2 1. States Parties shall respect and ensure the rights set forth in the present Convention to each child within their jurisdiction without discrimination of any kind, irrespective of the child's or his or her parent's or legal guardian's race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national, ethnic or social origin, property, disability, birth or other status.
meandogsarescary 3 years ago
Article 1 For the purposes of the present Convention, a child means every human being below the age of eighteen years unless under the law applicable to the child, majority is attained earlier.
meandogsarescary 3 years ago
These assholes want the right to abuse children. well you cant have it! children are people, and american children do in fact have constitutional rights. These assholes want to take children's rights away. It's against the law for your boss at work to spank you on the ass every time they want your undivided attention. But these fuckhead child abusing religious fanatics think they have the right to abuse their children. This asshole, and his sheople followers, are a disgrace to humanity.
DecentralizedTommy 3 years ago
Spanking is not inherently abusive. The relationship between an employer and an employee and a parent and a (sometimes pre-verbal) child aren't the same and drawing analogies between them is nonsensical.
EuphrasieF 3 years ago
why do you have to hit? why cant you teach?
The reason I used a boss vs parent, they each teach you your job, you dont want your boss slapping your ass to get your attention or when you do something wrong, in fact it's against the law, bec of the constitution, so at what age do children have constitutional rights? get it now chump?
DecentralizedTommy 3 years ago
Hitting, in the appropriate circumstances *is* a form of teaching.
There is no constitutional provision against being hit on the rear, at any age. It's against the law for employers to do so, but that has nothing to do with the Constitution. You have your facts wrong.
EuphrasieF 3 years ago
And by hitting, I mean specifically spanking on the rear, just so you can't twist my words.
EuphrasieF 3 years ago
you teach it's okay for mommy to hit, but not the child. Typical hypocrite, you accomplish nothing, crime is on the rise, everyone spanks/hits. You have no argument. You running out of option either from no patients are lack of parenting skills/education, so you have to bully those smaller than you, that you wish to control like robots. My guess is you dont even have any kids.
DecentralizedTommy 3 years ago
//Typical hypocrite, you accomplish nothing, crime is on the rise, everyone spanks/hits//
Crime is on the rise; but corporal punishment is declining. Most schools don't use it. I don't think there's a correlation, myself.
Parental discipline, including spanking, is not bullying.
EuphrasieF 3 years ago
You can tech a child with out hurting them physically, means you are the problem, not the child, however your child with most likely continue the cycle of ignorance
DecentralizedTommy 3 years ago
I do agree that spanking a child because of one's own inability to control one's emotions or impulses is wrong and counter-productive. I do not, however, believe that corporal punishment administered in a clear, calm, patient manner is at all wrong.
Also, Singapore has a very low crime rate and a culture that is very in favor of spanking. That does not imply that one caused the other, however, it does indicate that spanking and well behaved children and adults can coexist.
Ziiiv 2 years ago 2
You have to resort to hitting because you fail at teaching from the start with love and understanding, disapline, structure, stability, etc
You know knowing of personal liberties lined out in the constitution, and it shows
DecentralizedTommy 3 years ago
It shows ...? It shows what?
EuphrasieF 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
That you made a mistake
DecentralizedTommy 3 years ago
I did, eh? Can you tell me what clause in the Constitution outlaws hitting people on the rear?
EuphrasieF 3 years ago
look up personal liberties
DecentralizedTommy 3 years ago
In other words, you can't actually give me a citation. Yep, I knew it.
EuphrasieF 3 years ago
it's called the constitution, you idiot
DecentralizedTommy 3 years ago
Which article or amendment of the Constitution are you referring to?
EuphrasieF 3 years ago
dont being an asshole. you have constitutional rights, that protect your personal liberties and the right to pursue happiness. Do you deny this?
DecentralizedTommy 3 years ago
Of course not. I'm just amused that you're still failing to come up with a citation - that's a fancy word for a quote - from the Constitution that has anything to do with corporal punishment.
EuphrasieF 3 years ago
I dont believe corporal punishment is mentioned in the constitution. I do believe that supreme court has ruled in favor, but their are laws if it;s done to the extreme. You know this, I know this. But my point is what protects your personal liberties, should also protect those of a child, meaning children have the same rights. What's next, you gonna cite the bible? lol
DecentralizedTommy 3 years ago
//I dont believe corporal punishment is mentioned in the constitution.//
Finally you admit it.
//it;s done to the extreme//
A slap on the rear is in no way extreme.
//But my point is what protects your personal liberties, should also protect those of a child, meaning children have the same rights.//
When are you taking your children to the polling booth? When are you going to let them use guns?
EuphrasieF 3 years ago
I never said it does contain the words "corporal punishment" You asked if it does, and I told you it doesn't.
Has far as voting age, and age to have guns, each has varied in different states, and each have changed.
DecentralizedTommy 3 years ago
I asked if it addressed the issue, not if it used the words. Don't be daft.
//there are to many blue laws already, no need for any more. //
There's a total of one blue law applicable in my area, and no-one cares enough about it to change it.
EuphrasieF 3 years ago
//Has far as voting age, and age to have guns, each has varied in different states, and each have changed. //
Yes, but you allowed your children these rights as soon as they were born, right? After all, you think children and adults should have the same rights...
EuphrasieF 3 years ago
You dont through commonsense out the window because it's not set in stone, and you have to abide to local laws of each culture anyway.
You're one to tell me not to be "daft" when that's ll you have been from the start. pfts!
why do you want to hurt children?
You can teach with out resorting to violence, and I feel sorry for you
DecentralizedTommy 3 years ago
cant*
I really should proof read, but eh, w/e :P
DecentralizedTommy 3 years ago
Another attempt at evading the questions I've asked. It's quite fun watching you make a fool of yourself.
Oh, and spanking is not "hurting" children.
EuphrasieF 3 years ago
I answered the question. funny, I asked you a few questions which you did not answer, but yet you accuse me of doing what YOU do, when I have not.
yes, you are making a fool of yourself.
You want to hit children, because you can not teach them without hitting them. You lack the parenting skills.
DecentralizedTommy 3 years ago
why dont you spend this time making your very first video, huh, mr freeloader?
DecentralizedTommy 3 years ago
Neither the interest nor the software to do so.
EuphrasieF 3 years ago
//What's next, you gonna cite the bible? lol //
Unlike the Constitution, the Bible does have stuff to say about corporal punishment, so it might just be more relevant if I were to do so.
EuphrasieF 3 years ago
separation of church and state is a must. there are to many blue laws already, no need for any more.
DecentralizedTommy 3 years ago
So you're proposing that if the aforementioned "love and understanding, disapline, structure, stability, etc" are provided, the child will never decide to go ahead and ignore the rules anyway? I have a hard time believing that.
You say that it's possible to "teach" without hitting. Certainly it is, however, spanking is reserved for when the child has been clearly and thoroughly taught what they should do, and has chosen to ignore what they have been taught.
Ziiiv 2 years ago 7
@Ziiiv -- Spanking children only teaches them that violence is ok if you're angry enough. Any parent who has to hit his child to get them to change behavior is automatically a bad parent. If you have to HIT your child to get his attention, you've likely already failed as a parent.
A good parent can make his child listen and obey without touching them. That is where the real parenting skill comes in.
ColonPal 10 months ago
@ColonPal
Children can and do cross the line in ways that are in no way the parents' fault. Just because you tell them not to lie and show them how not to lie doesn't mean they won't lie anyway. When and if that happens a stern talking to is not enough.
Ziiiv 10 months ago
@Ziiiv -- Then I guess you have problem kids who are obviously out of control already. Taking away privileges works wonders when getting them to comply with reason. I believe that children who lie are almost always doing so because they learned it in their home or didn't have consistent discipline.
Parenting must be vigilant for best results -- kids won't lie if they know doing so will cause them to lose privileges.
ColonPal 10 months ago
//at what age do children have constitutional rights?//
Most *actual* constitutional rights (as opposed to imaginary ones) are assumed to be conferred at adulthood.
EuphrasieF 3 years ago
The reason the relationships are different is because the difference between employee and employer is less. The employee is an adult, or at least in his/her late teens - they are at a more mature stage in their development, and thus, their interactions will be different in character.
EuphrasieF 3 years ago
Fix this video it cuts out
AmsterdamWitch 3 years ago
Time for another American Revolution?
catholicmilitant 3 years ago
corporations have the 14th amendment rights yet the parents dont? something has to be done as the state is allowed to let the kids run while for the money yet the suffer from projection in the acusations of the parents who they speak ill of to the kids.
mountain19 3 years ago
This organization is working to protect parental rights. Go to their web site, read what they have to say, and you can help keep government out of our homes!
hope4kidz 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I can't understand how you buttfucks waste your time with this crap.
BAUTISTOV 3 years ago