@1488bill a great king ? he lost an entire continent becaue he didnt give them the right to vote. a great king would have never lost so much over so little.
@prowlifik The greatest King in the world would have still lost the Colonies, it was inevitable. Do you think any monarch would be able to have held on to the Colonies? And if so, there would still have been a revolution in the Americas. Technically it wasn't the entire continent he lost, just the area the the colonies, which was about 1/3 of the United States today. He was a great King, its sad that he suffered from acute intermittent porphyria.
He was a great King, he only became unstable late in his life.
1488bill 1 year ago 4
Comment removed
prowlifik 1 year ago
@1488bill a great king ? he lost an entire continent becaue he didnt give them the right to vote. a great king would have never lost so much over so little.
prowlifik 1 second ago
prowlifik 1 year ago
@prowlifik The greatest King in the world would have still lost the Colonies, it was inevitable. Do you think any monarch would be able to have held on to the Colonies? And if so, there would still have been a revolution in the Americas. Technically it wasn't the entire continent he lost, just the area the the colonies, which was about 1/3 of the United States today. He was a great King, its sad that he suffered from acute intermittent porphyria.
BritainShallPrevail 1 year ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
@prowlifik Stupid yank, you have no idea about your own history.
TheLiberalKnight 3 months ago
He was a tyrant. He wasn't fit to run any country. He was bonkers with Porphyria. He couldn't even run his own life.
N9BJJ 1 year ago