That was... pretty stupid. What did they think was gonna happen? It'd only tickle a little? It's a fucking sword ! :S I'm stunned. Funny stuff though and glad that no one was hurt. And with hurt I mean got their head cleaved in half
normally, a samurai sword can rip your skin right off. this is also vital evidence that proves that Katanas cant fight armored enemies very well. thus proving that knights would kick there asses back to japan :D
You're right about the cheap tricks part though.
i hate the hype of martial arts when it comes to the karate chop and the Katana. the best ways to fight normally involve kicking your foe in the bollocks.
You have no idea what you are talking about, it is not difficult for a samurai to kill a man with armor. There are ALWAYS openings in the armor which allow the person to actually move. Thus the samurai would have no trouble at all killing a fool knight. Also, the katana's main use is that of art, not that of war.
@agentkungeh p.s knights were not as restricted as we say they were and only weighed 80 pounds more in there armor yet current armor weighs 160 pounds
That's called a stab..... anyways, a samurai doesnt wear heavy ass armor, thus allowing them to move quickly. It would take the knight too long to swing to actually hit the samurai. The knight would probably wear himself out before he could actually do any damage.
@hedlessniper It's a stab yes. but the katana is a cutting weapon. Second, samurai's don't wear super heavy armor know, but it's scaled and so incredibly inflexible. Believe it or not but a knight would be more capable of outmaneuvering a samurai in his armor. If the samurai didn't wear his armor it would be a different story of course.
Oh and, there are many accounts of knights fighting in their armor for hours before having to stop from exhaustion. It isn't as heavy as you think.
It does not matter if the katana is a cutting weapon, you can stab with it. Second, if the armor is not heavy it is not strong, and it can be penetrated.
@hedlessniper You can stab with a katana yes, but notice how they dont teach you to do that? Yeah, because it ruins them retard. Katana's are brittle as hell.
Oh and no, weight does not = strength. An obvious example would be diamonds. Their molecular layout gives them incredible strength at much reduced weight compared to any metal. Clearly the strength of an item is more to do with it's molecular layout AS ANY FUCKING SCIENTIST WILL TILL YOU.
@hedlessniper Yeah no shit, that doesn't mean balls though, because the bullet just glances off the edge. Try bending the sword from the side and see how long it takes to break. It won't take long.
@agentkungeh Not to totally destroy your argument, but your "molecular structure" argument only applies of the swords were being made of different materials, like diamonds instead of steel. Unless the forger manager to change the molecular layout of the steel he's using, your argument doesn't apply.
@hobodoctor What the hell are you talking about? I wasn't talking about making making diamond swords I was comparing brittleness to flexibility in metal. Most metals are flexible at lower levels of thickness, but they are also brittle. This is clearly a big problem when you're making a sword that isn't broad.
@agentkungeh You were comparing the weight/strength ratio of different materials to the weight/strength ratio of different swords, which are pretty much all made with steel. Unless the forger goes in to alter the steel on a molecular level, more steel is stronger than less steel and weight does equal strength.
@agentkungeh Heating doesn't change the molecular structure of anything. You can shape it better, you can pack it tighter, but you don't reshape the molecules at a microscopic level. Mercury and "led" are different elements. Withing the context of the same element, weight equal strength. More steel is always stronger than less steel.
@agentkungeh That's because of the state of matter it's in! If you cool that same water again it becomes the exact same ice! All swords are at room temperature when they're being used.
@hobodoctor but the molecular structure determines the "state of matter" , ice has a completely different molecular structure to water and if the molecular structure did not change then neither would its "form", why do you think you have to change the molecular structure of carbon materials like sulfur to make diamonds via extreme heat and pressure in the first place? and again i say, if what you say is true then why does ice melt?
@agentkungeh Okay, this is obviously going a little over your head so I'm going to re-word it as simply as I can. Ice is cold, water is warm. Diamonds and Sulfur aren't the same materials. The steel used in swords is all the same temperature when it's being used and all the same material.
Now if you can think of a single example that would apply to the room temperature steel that is used in swords where less weight is stronger than more weight, I will bow to you and call you God.
@hobodoctor Lol? Simple take a long thin piece of steel (say a meter long) and bend it. Now try the same with a piece of steel 1cm long but of the same thickness. I can guarantee you it will be alot harder to bend.
Besides if what you say about weight essentially equaling the strength of a material then that would make mercury one of the strongest materials around (despite it's liquid form). Don't get me wrong it's strong for what it is, but strength is too loose a word anyway.
@agentkungeh The weight WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF ONE ELEMENT equals strength. More steel is stronger than less steel, more Mercury is stronger than less Mercury, More titanium is stronger than less titanium. Stop with the stupid Mercury analogy. And the MOLECULAR structure of steel has nothing to do with the shape it's formed in.
@hobodoctor "Lol? Simple take a long thin piece of steel (say a meter long) and bend it. Now try the same with a piece of steel 1cm long but of the same thickness. I can guarantee you it will be alot harder to bend. "
@hobodoctor "Lol? Simple take a long thin piece of steel (say a meter long) and bend it. Now try the same with a piece of steel 1cm long but of the same thickness"
@agentkungeh Yes, and I said, it has nothing to do with the shape it's in. The molecules will still be formed the same for one, and secondly swords aren't shaped different enough from each other for that to make a difference. The strength of a sword comes from its density and density is mass times volume. The more mass it has, the stronger it is.
@hobodoctor In the example I cited, I specifically stated that they were of the same density. The ONLY difference is the shape. You can clearly see this effect if you try to snap a short pencil as opposed to a long pencil. The longer one will always be easier to snap.
@agentkungeh That doesn't apply to weight AT ALL. Shaping it differently in no way alters the weight. The only question is whether more WEIGHT always means more strength, and the only way to properly deduce that is to take away all the other factors that might make a difference. So, what's easier to break, a pencil that weighs 10 grams or a pencil in the exact same size and shape that weighs 100 grams?
@hobodoctor Shape doesn't effect the weight no, but it does effect the way an objects own weight can be used against it. I understand the point you're trying to make, but very often the weight of an object dictates the shape it will form.
@hobodoctor It doesn't matter if they're artificially or naturally shaped. However, the fact is that a longer sword even if it weighs more will always be easier to break then a shorter sword.
@hobodoctor the molecular layout is changed in the heat treatment, you idiot, why do you think samurai swords go through multiple heat treatments and why do you think they dont stamp the swords into shape?
how about water? think about the fact that cooling freezes everything together and that heating splits them apart, its all a matter of bonding, not weight.
@hedlessniper I call bullshit on that. Every hypothetical with samurais is like "Well the other guy would probably miss for some reason and then trip and leave himself open.." Yeah, samurais wore less armor making them lighter, they weren't the fucking Flash. There's a not a single thing a samurai would have done to survive a charging knight with a sword or lance.
@hedlessniper Of course the samurai sword can kill the armored, that dousnt mean its the best choice against the armored though, simply because it does not have the weight that a broad sword has to effectively crush a man in his armor. this means that a knight doesn't have to look for an opening whatsoever.
another point to make is that knights commonly used there broad swords like effective heavy fencing swords, they would either look for a WEAKNESS or bash their armor with the handle.
I am with you guys. What an absolute prick not to mention a god awful swordsman.
I would rather assume he is incompetant than assume he was actually trying to kill the woman. She was backing off for f..s sake.
TERMALERT 1 year ago
What a way to treat ur woman!!
mrdubcrazy 1 year ago
stupid
karel12358 1 year ago
That was... pretty stupid. What did they think was gonna happen? It'd only tickle a little? It's a fucking sword ! :S I'm stunned. Funny stuff though and glad that no one was hurt. And with hurt I mean got their head cleaved in half
FoggyFishburne 1 year ago
that was so stupid even though he cut the fruit he still ended up knicking the guys head if he had been a bit closer this guy would be in a body bag
TAKIZAWAYAMASHITA 1 year ago
that was so stupid
1bol1 1 year ago
wtf if he diddnt step back.............
dutchfreaker 1 year ago
the man that slashing the fruit hits him. he sees that he is in deep pain and he just walks away
narutofreak1456 1 year ago
It's not even a clean cut on that apple.
This guy is very lucky, the sword was not sharpened.
AutoFirePad 1 year ago
omfg stupid idea..cut that out!..NO! i dont mean it literally!!
Kapuzina1337 1 year ago
would have had a big gash in his face if he dident jump back
AvengedxTaco 1 year ago
my turn
Basfoo 1 year ago
suicide by a sword master
mjremington 1 year ago
So much for Japanese being super smart eh?
agentkungeh 2 years ago
i know right
AIRSOFTBIZAR123 2 years ago
Such a stupid, risky thing to do, and even if it had gone right it wouldn't prove a single thing...
When will people learn that martial arts are not about cheap tricks...
bruno22phoenix 2 years ago 4
it did sorta go right.
normally, a samurai sword can rip your skin right off. this is also vital evidence that proves that Katanas cant fight armored enemies very well. thus proving that knights would kick there asses back to japan :D
You're right about the cheap tricks part though.
i hate the hype of martial arts when it comes to the karate chop and the Katana. the best ways to fight normally involve kicking your foe in the bollocks.
agentkungeh 2 years ago
You have no idea what you are talking about, it is not difficult for a samurai to kill a man with armor. There are ALWAYS openings in the armor which allow the person to actually move. Thus the samurai would have no trouble at all killing a fool knight. Also, the katana's main use is that of art, not that of war.
hedlessniper 1 year ago
@hedlessniper Their openings yes, BUT THE SAMURAI SWORD IS A SLASHING WEAPON AND THUS WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THESE SMALL OPENINGS.
agentkungeh 1 year ago
@agentkungeh p.s knights were not as restricted as we say they were and only weighed 80 pounds more in there armor yet current armor weighs 160 pounds
agentkungeh 1 year ago
That's called a stab..... anyways, a samurai doesnt wear heavy ass armor, thus allowing them to move quickly. It would take the knight too long to swing to actually hit the samurai. The knight would probably wear himself out before he could actually do any damage.
hedlessniper 1 year ago
@hedlessniper It's a stab yes. but the katana is a cutting weapon. Second, samurai's don't wear super heavy armor know, but it's scaled and so incredibly inflexible. Believe it or not but a knight would be more capable of outmaneuvering a samurai in his armor. If the samurai didn't wear his armor it would be a different story of course.
Oh and, there are many accounts of knights fighting in their armor for hours before having to stop from exhaustion. It isn't as heavy as you think.
agentkungeh 1 year ago
It does not matter if the katana is a cutting weapon, you can stab with it. Second, if the armor is not heavy it is not strong, and it can be penetrated.
hedlessniper 1 year ago
@hedlessniper You can stab with a katana yes, but notice how they dont teach you to do that? Yeah, because it ruins them retard. Katana's are brittle as hell.
Oh and no, weight does not = strength. An obvious example would be diamonds. Their molecular layout gives them incredible strength at much reduced weight compared to any metal. Clearly the strength of an item is more to do with it's molecular layout AS ANY FUCKING SCIENTIST WILL TILL YOU.
Fucking dumbass.
agentkungeh 1 year ago
Lol you're mad. Katana's are not brittle. You can shoot a katana with a .50 cal. several times and it wont break.
hedlessniper 1 year ago
@hedlessniper Yeah no shit, that doesn't mean balls though, because the bullet just glances off the edge. Try bending the sword from the side and see how long it takes to break. It won't take long.
agentkungeh 1 year ago
@agentkungeh Not to totally destroy your argument, but your "molecular structure" argument only applies of the swords were being made of different materials, like diamonds instead of steel. Unless the forger manager to change the molecular layout of the steel he's using, your argument doesn't apply.
hobodoctor 1 year ago
@hobodoctor What the hell are you talking about? I wasn't talking about making making diamond swords I was comparing brittleness to flexibility in metal. Most metals are flexible at lower levels of thickness, but they are also brittle. This is clearly a big problem when you're making a sword that isn't broad.
agentkungeh 1 year ago
@agentkungeh You were comparing the weight/strength ratio of different materials to the weight/strength ratio of different swords, which are pretty much all made with steel. Unless the forger goes in to alter the steel on a molecular level, more steel is stronger than less steel and weight does equal strength.
hobodoctor 1 year ago
@hobodoctor and p.s if weight equaled strength then led and mercury would be extremely tough, except led is quite soft.
agentkungeh 1 year ago
@agentkungeh Heating doesn't change the molecular structure of anything. You can shape it better, you can pack it tighter, but you don't reshape the molecules at a microscopic level. Mercury and "led" are different elements. Withing the context of the same element, weight equal strength. More steel is always stronger than less steel.
hobodoctor 1 year ago
@hobodoctor right... so if heating dousnt change the structure of anything then why does ice melt?
agentkungeh 1 year ago
@agentkungeh That's because of the state of matter it's in! If you cool that same water again it becomes the exact same ice! All swords are at room temperature when they're being used.
hobodoctor 1 year ago
@hobodoctor but the molecular structure determines the "state of matter" , ice has a completely different molecular structure to water and if the molecular structure did not change then neither would its "form", why do you think you have to change the molecular structure of carbon materials like sulfur to make diamonds via extreme heat and pressure in the first place? and again i say, if what you say is true then why does ice melt?
agentkungeh 1 year ago
@agentkungeh Okay, this is obviously going a little over your head so I'm going to re-word it as simply as I can. Ice is cold, water is warm. Diamonds and Sulfur aren't the same materials. The steel used in swords is all the same temperature when it's being used and all the same material.
Now if you can think of a single example that would apply to the room temperature steel that is used in swords where less weight is stronger than more weight, I will bow to you and call you God.
hobodoctor 1 year ago
@hobodoctor Lol? Simple take a long thin piece of steel (say a meter long) and bend it. Now try the same with a piece of steel 1cm long but of the same thickness. I can guarantee you it will be alot harder to bend.
Besides if what you say about weight essentially equaling the strength of a material then that would make mercury one of the strongest materials around (despite it's liquid form). Don't get me wrong it's strong for what it is, but strength is too loose a word anyway.
agentkungeh 1 year ago
@agentkungeh The weight WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF ONE ELEMENT equals strength. More steel is stronger than less steel, more Mercury is stronger than less Mercury, More titanium is stronger than less titanium. Stop with the stupid Mercury analogy. And the MOLECULAR structure of steel has nothing to do with the shape it's formed in.
hobodoctor 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@hobodoctor "Lol? Simple take a long thin piece of steel (say a meter long) and bend it. Now try the same with a piece of steel 1cm long but of the same thickness. I can guarantee you it will be alot harder to bend. "
You completely ignored this part.
agentkungeh 1 year ago
@hobodoctor "Lol? Simple take a long thin piece of steel (say a meter long) and bend it. Now try the same with a piece of steel 1cm long but of the same thickness"
did you even look at this?
agentkungeh 1 year ago
@agentkungeh Yes, and I said, it has nothing to do with the shape it's in. The molecules will still be formed the same for one, and secondly swords aren't shaped different enough from each other for that to make a difference. The strength of a sword comes from its density and density is mass times volume. The more mass it has, the stronger it is.
hobodoctor 1 year ago
@hobodoctor In the example I cited, I specifically stated that they were of the same density. The ONLY difference is the shape. You can clearly see this effect if you try to snap a short pencil as opposed to a long pencil. The longer one will always be easier to snap.
agentkungeh 1 year ago
@agentkungeh That doesn't apply to weight AT ALL. Shaping it differently in no way alters the weight. The only question is whether more WEIGHT always means more strength, and the only way to properly deduce that is to take away all the other factors that might make a difference. So, what's easier to break, a pencil that weighs 10 grams or a pencil in the exact same size and shape that weighs 100 grams?
hobodoctor 1 year ago
@hobodoctor Shape doesn't effect the weight no, but it does effect the way an objects own weight can be used against it. I understand the point you're trying to make, but very often the weight of an object dictates the shape it will form.
agentkungeh 1 year ago
@agentkungeh And how does that at all apply to swords, which are manually shaped?
hobodoctor 1 year ago
@hobodoctor It doesn't matter if they're artificially or naturally shaped. However, the fact is that a longer sword even if it weighs more will always be easier to break then a shorter sword.
agentkungeh 1 year ago
@agentkungeh If it's using the same amount of steel...
hobodoctor 1 year ago
@hobodoctor So? If it uses more steel but is shaped long it will still be easier to break.
agentkungeh 1 year ago
@agentkungeh So? If it uses more steel but is shaped long it will still be easier to break.
agentkungeh 1 year ago
@hobodoctor the molecular layout is changed in the heat treatment, you idiot, why do you think samurai swords go through multiple heat treatments and why do you think they dont stamp the swords into shape?
how about water? think about the fact that cooling freezes everything together and that heating splits them apart, its all a matter of bonding, not weight.
agentkungeh 1 year ago
@hedlessniper I call bullshit on that. Every hypothetical with samurais is like "Well the other guy would probably miss for some reason and then trip and leave himself open.." Yeah, samurais wore less armor making them lighter, they weren't the fucking Flash. There's a not a single thing a samurai would have done to survive a charging knight with a sword or lance.
hobodoctor 1 year ago
It's called a dodge. Not a hard thing to do. You are only making yourself look like a fucking dumbass.
hedlessniper 1 year ago
@hedlessniper Why even bother wearing armor if you can just dodge?
hobodoctor 1 year ago
@hedlessniper Of course the samurai sword can kill the armored, that dousnt mean its the best choice against the armored though, simply because it does not have the weight that a broad sword has to effectively crush a man in his armor. this means that a knight doesn't have to look for an opening whatsoever.
another point to make is that knights commonly used there broad swords like effective heavy fencing swords, they would either look for a WEAKNESS or bash their armor with the handle.
agentkungeh 1 year ago
that is the stupidest thing ive ever seen.
FTOdude 2 years ago 15
is this the equivalent of shooting apples of heads?
alikokos 2 years ago 3
shit, and that was with him backing off...
ObiWanBockobi 2 years ago 9
And the one with the sword is not careing at all... crazy ninja!
jellypal 2 years ago
holy crap his head could have been sliced in half!!
rockstock 3 years ago