What Transformed the WTC Buildings to DUST on 9/11?

[RadarRecon]

How many stories of basements were there? That's a big hole.

But better yet, building 7 wasn't hit by a plane, but its collapse was a PICTURE PERFECT DEMOLITION - STRAIGHT DOWN. WHY isn't THAT a bigger question than it is?

[murdamook2281]

The jet fuel melted the Stella the concret just broke in half

[ragasdapper]

bush and co need to man up american government need to be shot for this

[TheMarkComedyShow]

Think about this: The explosion of the plane (or collision, if you like) spread the debris around. Looking at the building falling looks like it could've spread down. I am sure that if you gathered the debris, it would be at least 13.5 stories tall.

[muratner]

nice vid

[bimtanja]

I <3 you

[ddetectivee]

Watch these two clips.

youtube.com/watch?v=nncvxvBHdi­c 

youtube.com/watch?v=L1FaowaSe3­c

[SweetPawsMcGenty]

Two problems here: The building you gave as an example (The King Dome) is circular and has a broad base, allowing it pile up on itself. The Twin Towers were taller and skinnier, which causes the debris to flow outward. The debris would not pile uniformly upwards in the same tight rectangular shape the building was in. Secondly, you've made a leap of logic by claiming that office fires even caused by jet fuel fire wouldn't cause dust but never explained "why." Logic must be used.

[2000tc88]

@SweetPawsMcGenty Logically,the Kingdome is circular and as it is empty in the centre it is hardly going to pile up on itself.Logically just what causes the twin towers to flow outward,because they are tall and skinny.

Photographic evidence shows virtually no debris outside the block the wtc bldgs sat on,the pile was barely half way up wtc 6 an 8 story bldg.

Do you really need it explained to you why fire does not cause that much dust,if you do I do not think logic would work.

[SweetPawsMcGenty]

@2000tc88 You have to explain why fire caused by jet fuel wouldn't cause dust. Secondly, the King Dome having a hollow center is EXACTLY why it would collapse in on itself. Finally, the King Dome and WTC may not be analogous buildlings to compare, since they are of different shape and constructed from widely varied materials.

Also, there has to be an explanation for the dust given. What would turn the WTC into the dust? No hypothesis?

[2000tc88]

@SweetPawsMcGenty Jet fuel would cause ash,does not burn hot enough to turn concrete to dust,most fuel ignited in initial explosion.

Kingdome,my point is it was 30 feet high on demo from 250ft and hollow,towers 110 storys high not hollow left pile same height,where did the towers go???.

Not constructed from widely varied materials as you say but both from concrete and steel,hardly varied.

My hypothesis,do some reasearch into field effects,start with Tesla.

[SweetPawsMcGenty]

@2000tc88 I have researched Tesla. This is ad hominem, and perhaps poisoning the well, but I find it hard to talk to someone who doesn't know what a hypothesis and expect them to understand logical discourse.

[2000tc88]

@SweetPawsMcGenty Logical discourse hey?I gave you logical answers.

Hypothesis hey?I gave you that also.

I think you should explain "how" fire caused by jet fuel would cause so much dust considering that most of the jet fuel went up in a ball of flames on impact.

Also explain how the Kingdome and WTC are made of "what" widely varied materials.

As you say logic must be used.

[PowerMirai85]

@SweetPawsMcGenty Thermobaric explosive charges. Here's your answer

[4dakstriker]

It is funny, you use evidence from a controlled demolition to say "this rubble pile was too short" but so many other "truthers" say "It was a controlled demolition". There were underground garages, shopping places, etc where debris was pushed into. As for the dust, there has never been another disaster of this scale using these same construction and destruction (burning jet fuel). So, your Superdome explanation is stupid.

[GeneralRushHour]

@4dakstriker Never in the history of mankind has buildings collapsed due to plane hits or fires.

Your and the goverments explanation is STUPID.

[2000tc88]

@4dakstriker There is photographic evidence actually showing the basements virtually intact,as was P.A.T.H.and the subway,why was the Bathtub not damaged,each tower weighed about 500,000 tons, yet it was slightly damaged by earthmoving equiptment a few days later.

Also the towers were built directly on bedrock yet their sisemic signal was no larger than that produced by the Kingdome which was built on normal Earth.

A controlled demo it was NOT.

[occision]

@4dakstriker 80% of the buildings blew away ..dust . there was no pancakes at the bottom . no jet fuel at wtc 7 . asking questions in a natural thing .

[curruptofficial]

your basing this on ONE controlled demolition ?? there are sooo many variables i mean come on.

[Mastermunks]

I see what you mean... but is it possible that the force of the debris falling from above crushed any remaining rubble? Like you said, it is 110 stories tall.

[Fxtrz]

@Mastermunks Matter is neither created nor destroyed.

[heavymetaldeath4life]

I did 9/11, for teh lulz.

[godbluffvdgg]

Whatever "they" used that day was very exotic. It may have been the first time used. I saw the 60 stories of central columns turn to dust. This process must have occurred over the hour that the towers stood or perhaps began before that and culminated in the event we were shown. I have been in construction for 30 years and I am a member of AE 911. Sadly for almost four years after the event I believed the "official" or OFFAL story. If only people would look at the evidence.Dr. Judy Wood is great!

[messengerofjesus]

Dr Jan Pajak says

UFO vehicle, at 9:50 am, thrust itself into the southern skyscraper near its top, about ten floors above the area that was burning. After it was inside of the skyscraper, the UFO vehicle switched on the action of its "plasma saw". The "plasma saw" started to evaporate the whole structure of this building, literally turning the entire building, together with all people inside, into a rapidly expanding cloud of evaporated steel, cement, glass,

totalizm pl/wtc htm

[disidentificazione]

The answer is so simple, simple like the truth: the towers was demolited by a underground nuclear device. This can explain the Dust paradox. Look on the web for "Dimitri Khalezov", you'll find all the details. Underground explosions don't create mushrooms like Hiroshima and can explain polverized steel dust.

[mwcdx]

@disidentificazione Dimitri Khalezov is the real deal. Every 9-11 truther needs to here what he has to say.

[PsyopsExposer]

@disidentificazione I think the nuclear device demolition idea is just another layer of the cover story. If the initial Psyops cover story fails then these people who planned this can fall back on a nuclear device demolition and still have room to explain it. But if people start asking questions like what type of new weapon can turn buildings into dust in such a controlled way then it would be very tough for them to come up with lies to cover this. just my rationale. ;)

[irishhellsangel]

@MarkGronan1988 Thanks for the support, i will do till we defeat these evil scumbags.