Dude, seriously? Posting wikipedia info to criticize a film? He actually wrote those books before he became a megachurch pastor or even a christian and his book feature a greater number of details, interviews, and evidence then the movie. The books he wrote were based on his investigations as to what lead him to convert to christianity. Oh and in all his books he provides references to every claim, interview, quote, and study ever utilized in his books. Just my two cents bud.
@sonoftheking85 he also give 2 completely different reasons for his conversion.
which wikipedia info are you talking about; the argument from ignorance part? he gives a BS excuse that he did not know anyway for.
to be honest with you i watch his movies hoping he was rigorous in his methodology. The biggest point was his case for christ when he mentions objections but only mentions one then dismisses it out right.
@nailo1 If you really are intrigued, I honestly sincerely invite you to read his books. They go into soooooooooooooo much further detail than the movies ever could and from what I recall, they provide references for everything. Movies are limited by budget and time constraints, there is so much that goes into a movie storie-wise too. I honestly think the movies are fascinating but the books are by far better written than any of the movies that are out.
This has been flagged as spam show
Dude, seriously? Posting wikipedia info to criticize a film? He actually wrote those books before he became a megachurch pastor or even a christian and his book feature a greater number of details, interviews, and evidence then the movie. The books he wrote were based on his investigations as to what lead him to convert to christianity. Oh and in all his books he provides references to every claim, interview, quote, and study ever utilized in his books. Just my two cents bud.
sonoftheking85 2 months ago
@sonoftheking85 he also give 2 completely different reasons for his conversion.
which wikipedia info are you talking about; the argument from ignorance part? he gives a BS excuse that he did not know anyway for.
to be honest with you i watch his movies hoping he was rigorous in his methodology. The biggest point was his case for christ when he mentions objections but only mentions one then dismisses it out right.
nailo1 2 months ago
@nailo1 If you really are intrigued, I honestly sincerely invite you to read his books. They go into soooooooooooooo much further detail than the movies ever could and from what I recall, they provide references for everything. Movies are limited by budget and time constraints, there is so much that goes into a movie storie-wise too. I honestly think the movies are fascinating but the books are by far better written than any of the movies that are out.
sonoftheking85 2 months ago
@nailo1 In all honesty the movies would be a good compliment to the books but they lack serious substance when held in comparison to the books.
sonoftheking85 2 months ago
Comment removed
sonoftheking85 2 months ago
where is part 2?
Paxmax 2 years ago
it got rejected it'll be up in a sec
nailo1 2 years ago
Very interesting, 5 stars, and on to part 2
finchfrance 2 years ago
thank you, i really am giving this project my full attention
nailo1 2 years ago