Haha It's funny how this guy didn't actually give a reason as to why viduka is better!
I love Viduka cos I'm Aussie, he's part of why I've been a Leeds fan since I was a little kid. But he's not better than Shearer. They're both natural goalscorers, but HSearer's a better one. Viduka has unbelievable skill, and he's also very good at assisting goals, but i don't think you can compare one of the great goalscorers to the greatest
shearer had more than limted ablity.the only two strikers of the last 10 years you could call better than shearer are ronaldo and henry.people can talk about cantona,berkamp take away there vision,passing ect there not so gret shearer tell me a striker who like shearer had great tackling,crossing,as good in the air as good as holding it up shearer had way more ablity in his prime than viduka.
Shearer really never showed moments of brilliance with his technical ability, But he was the best finisher in the world. Shearer was a great goalscorer much better than MV. But MV has too much class when you compare the two as players against each other.
come on shearer at his best even at 35 was better than viduca shearer did show moments of brilliance but mv does not have more class than shearer.shearer had the lot he had more ablity than viduca he is the best striker of the 90s along with ronaldo fact.that guy thinks mark is better because of what 1 skill he might have had better than shearer which i have yet to see by the way.
viduka is class but shearer is a loyal geordie who loves his club cant relly say that about vids can ya ? ps if any goerdies get near smif spit on him please
shearer passed the ball better,crossed,control,finishing,heading,shooting,strenth,vision and more he had better than viduca which makes him better anyone who even thinks mark is better watch shearer at his best there is no 1 better today without the tricks of henry and ronaldo.he is not called englands best striker ever and placed in the same class as john charles by a 66 year old man u fan on this site a britions greatest striker with big john charles.
the guy basicly admits shearer is better when he says shearer did more with limted ablity that means shearer is better then you would not hear anyone say bramble did more than pele ect.
I will put this down to the fact he is probably off his man tits on pills.
steve30toon 8 months ago
Viduka is a lazy cunt
d0nkeytr0n 1 year ago
Haha It's funny how this guy didn't actually give a reason as to why viduka is better!
I love Viduka cos I'm Aussie, he's part of why I've been a Leeds fan since I was a little kid. But he's not better than Shearer. They're both natural goalscorers, but HSearer's a better one. Viduka has unbelievable skill, and he's also very good at assisting goals, but i don't think you can compare one of the great goalscorers to the greatest
DrSamular7 1 year ago
what are all of you's talking about?
alan shearer is the all time premier league top goal scorer. doesnt that say it all?
viduka is just average.
hes nothing compared to alan.
why dont the vidukka lovers type in alan shearer on the search ..
then see who u think is better.
=]=]
Geejayemm08 3 years ago
shearer had more than limted ablity.the only two strikers of the last 10 years you could call better than shearer are ronaldo and henry.people can talk about cantona,berkamp take away there vision,passing ect there not so gret shearer tell me a striker who like shearer had great tackling,crossing,as good in the air as good as holding it up shearer had way more ablity in his prime than viduka.
thetoon99 3 years ago
haha wtf sheare is class
i think viduka is wank tbh
pimmytowell 3 years ago
Both great but Viduka is a class above Shearer
bergil23 3 years ago
fuck off ya prick
lewisallen2008 2 years ago
Viduka will turn shearer on a 5 cent piece.
Shearer really never showed moments of brilliance with his technical ability, But he was the best finisher in the world. Shearer was a great goalscorer much better than MV. But MV has too much class when you compare the two as players against each other.
Too much class to even try compare the two.
westcom 4 years ago
come on shearer at his best even at 35 was better than viduca shearer did show moments of brilliance but mv does not have more class than shearer.shearer had the lot he had more ablity than viduca he is the best striker of the 90s along with ronaldo fact.that guy thinks mark is better because of what 1 skill he might have had better than shearer which i have yet to see by the way.
thetoon99 4 years ago
viduka is class but shearer is a loyal geordie who loves his club cant relly say that about vids can ya ? ps if any goerdies get near smif spit on him please
bazls14 4 years ago
shearer passed the ball better,crossed,control,finishing,heading,shooting,strenth,vision and more he had better than viduca which makes him better anyone who even thinks mark is better watch shearer at his best there is no 1 better today without the tricks of henry and ronaldo.he is not called englands best striker ever and placed in the same class as john charles by a 66 year old man u fan on this site a britions greatest striker with big john charles.
thetoon99 4 years ago
gooooo dukes!
AussieDolla 4 years ago
the guy basicly admits shearer is better when he says shearer did more with limted ablity that means shearer is better then you would not hear anyone say bramble did more than pele ect.
thetoon99 4 years ago
Bollocks to the fat bloke
trojanhorse99 4 years ago