How Do We Know? Physics, Forcings, and Fingerprints

[jq747]

...And now looking at the vid, I see Richard Alley is even goofier looking than Roger XD But I guess climate change must be right, since they use funny sound effects.

[jq747]

The first time I viewed this vid, I actually listened to it while looking at something else. I fully thought the guy speaking was Roger from "American Dad". LOL

[rusty1491]

I misspoke in my last reply thinking it was you who posted the video. I apologize about that, but really do you think the chart @10:58 is not a fabrication? Did it ever dawn on you that it is really you being political and unthinking? You accepted a falsified chart as truth without even doing an internet search of the true temperature data.

I agree that CO2 is a greenhouse gas, I'm just pointig out the chicken little antics.

[BeondaPale]

Liar, pusher of ignorance - the national research council validated it.

[rusty1491]

Where's the little ice-age, where's the medieval warm period in this validated graph? There has been push to overblow data by a small group of environmental extremists in climatology. There will be at worst a 0.5 degree C increase in temperature if CO2 were doubled right now. Even this figure may be too high. What have I lied about and what ignorance am I pushing?

[BeondaPale]

Both are in the graph - LOOK!! You can pretend not to see them if you want, it wont change the FACT that they are represented.

You (an anonymous youtube poster) say unequiviically that there will be "at worst" a 0.5 degree increase and expect to be taken seriously. Unequivical knowlege in science is pretty hard to come by. On what do you base such certainty

You lied when you said the graph was fabricated - it was not

You lied when you said it was debunked - it was not

[starrdreams]

@rusty1491 Chart @10:58 is not a fabrication. Really - do your research.

[rusty1491]

@starrdreams I've have and the NAS even states Michael Mann understates the uncertainties and his methods were flawed when creating the graph. I'm curious what charges will be filed against Prof Jones after next month's independent review. I personally think they'll pity him and only fine him and ask him to permanently step down.

[starrdreams]

@rusty1491

NAS said about some uncertainties. But NAS didn't say this graph is wrong.

They note, that despite those uncertainties, the key conclusions reached by those studies (i.e., that hemispheric-scale warmth in recent decades is likely unprecedented over at last the past millennium) have been substantiated by many other studies, and the confidence in those conclusions appears greater after nearly an additional decade of research.

For more. Google "National Academies Synthesis Report"

[bogdy72000]

what does the thermometer in this guys ass said? he must be running high with fever

[CarbonSuit]

ooooooh Glaiven!

[CarbonSuit]

this guys a real character. hes got an awesome professor Frink voice.

[rusty1491]

@10:58 The 'Wack-A-Mole' reappears

@11:57 Michael Mann lies about how his bogus chart gets a hockey stick shape.

[NwZ2]

bigoted, biased assholes like yourself are too far gone to be able to be convinced of the truth, even if you were on fire because of it.

[rusty1491]

I was pointing out that Michael Mann's temperature chart has been debunked for several years now. It keeps popping up just like a Wack-A-Mole. What's wrong with the genuine temperature record and why exaggerate?

[deprofundis442]

@rusty1491

The graph has been reafirmed by NAS with more recent and corrected data, IIRC (might have been AAAS). Look up greenman's climate crock video series on youtube. I believe he has a video about it with links to the published update.

[BeondaPale]

You are not interested in science, rusty.

You are interested in promoting ignorance in order to promote a political agenda