Sure. NASA faked it all, using Disney for the simulations and we are all happy that some 'troof' seekers discovered that only those simulations were used. Man... you are awesome.
Been watching Disney Channel again? Where did all the real time data come from? MC received all kinds of data from pressure, temperature, flow rates, fuel consumption, fuel tank level, etc. all in real time. The engineers who designed the equipment made predictions as to how it would perform. Who hoaxed the data? Data that was so good that it not only fooled the people who designed it, but all the people since who have looked at the data and not found any problems.
@Rob260259 .. Speaking of Disney, did you know that he was best buds with moonfaker Werhner von Braun? .. They invented their manned moon shot fantasy together and then handed it to Kubrick to film and direct.
Ever heard of SIMULATIONS, Rob? .. It was admitted to by Apollo Flight Director Gene Krantz that neither he, nor any of the boys at mission control could tell the difference between the SIMS and a "real" lunar landing...OOPS AGAIN.
Aaah... Suddenly I get the whole idea... Disney produced those petrified moonrocks, gave them to a couple of hundred US ambassadors and then fooled all the scientists worldwide. Ofcourse!
No, you don't get the idea .. The petrified wood "moon" rock was only given to the dumb Dutch folks.. The rest of the fake rocks came from moonfaker von Braun's geological expedition to Antarctica and a few might have been recovered in the high volcanic regions of Hawaii, where the astronots "trained" .. NASA built a lunar sample receiving lab in Houston, a couple of years before pretending to land men on the Moon.. Which means they had plenty of time to fake some "lunar" rocks.
The extent to which the world has participated in the study of the Apollo samples clearly precludes any collusion, obfuscation or coercion. It's common use for conspiracists to claim that the Apollo Lunar samples are highly guarded by NASA and made available only to loyal researchers, but the facts do not bear this out.
Each year an independent peer review panel evaluates new research proposals, and curators mail out about 400 lunar samples to 40 to 50 scientists worldwide.
Some of the principle investigators of Lunar Samples: University of Cambridge, England, Geologic Survey, Canada, Australian University, Canberra, University of Berne, Switzerland, University of Cologne, Germany, the Max Planke Institute für Chemie in Mainz, Germany.
Oh yes, they have far more experience then those petrochemists here in Amsterdam, sure.
You seem to distort and twist a lot of facts that are in the public domain for many, many years.
"The tracking sites knew where their antennas were pointed and when they had data, etc. These questioners and conspiracists must think that we are stupid (hundreds of us that is); the data was recorded, archived and analyzed by dozens of engineers."
You do exactly the same as your look-a-like Stalkervision.
"Hey, I don't understand it, so it must be fake".
Thanks for the failure of not ignoring me and showing everyone how a hoaxhead reacts.
"Well Stray? Still no sources for your "OOPS"...?"
The source was apollo Flight Director Eugene Krantz in the documentary called 'Failure is Not an Option ! '
Gene let is slip that the SIMS were so realistic in every respect, that nobody at mission control, including himself , could tell the difference between a SIMULATED landing and a real landing.. Nothing like opening mouth and inserting foot while letting the hoax cat out of the bag!
Krantz's claim was not taken out of context , you game playing creep.. Those were his EXACT words .. Neither he, nor the anyone else at mission control, could tell the difference between a SIMULATED landing and a real one.. The lads at their monitors didn't have a freaking clue they were just looking at SIMS.
You could have worked for mission control during the Apollo fraud, since you don't have a freaking clue either, you brainwashed troll.
@straydog02 calling other people brainwashed eh? if you just thought about it for a moment you'd come to the realisation that when one of two people having a conversation is brainwashed, neither person will be able to find out who it is.
"The simulations were good but far from being perfect and they always required some kluges that Pete Klapach or others had to fix each time we ran a simulation. The data flow paths were different and sequencing of data from the tracking sites, pre-processed into 2.4 kbps or I believe later 4.8 kbps bit streams. We did elaborate checkouts of these paths from the bird to a spot on our displays or event lights."
"The tracking sites knew where their antennas were pointed and when they had data, etc. These questioners and conspiracists must think that we are stupid (hundreds of us that is); the data was recorded, archived and analyzed by dozens of engineers."
@DJNielsvdRee Het zal waarschijnlijk een schok voor jou zijn, maar ik heb nog meer nieuws voor jou. De aarde is ook niet plat! Zo, en nu terug onder je steen voor de komende 300 jaar.
Helemaal met je eens. Er zijn nog altijd figuren die denken dat ze slimmer zijn dan ingenieurs en wetenschappers. Zogenoemde 'truthseekers'. Alles wat op autoriteit of overheid lijkt wantrouwen ze. Een beetje paranoide denk ik.
@Rob260259 .. So where's the petrified wood "moon" rock those moonfakers presented to the Dutch Prime Minister?
I bet Buzz kept it in the same pocket he kept his "magic" pen ! .. You know the one that suppossedly launched the A11 LM .. Too bad his "magic" pen version of that "I saved the day" fairy tale, didn't match the original NASA fairy tale of Neil being instructed how to override that switch and rewire a new one.
Just another OOPS moment from the NEVER A STRAIGHT ANSWER swindlers.
Ah. Duane. Nice to see you again. I see our Dutch connection made you pay a visit to a 'Dutch video'...LOL
Well Stray, it's been a while. How about all those other samples? I bet those petrochemists must have had an opportunity to examine their rocks...?
Tell me Duane, if NASA faked the missions, the last thing they would have done was give away obviously fake samples. It took a petrochemist in Amsterdam only a few minutes. But the Dutch are fast ofcourse...
What to debate about? The psychological tendency for people to think that a significant event must have been caused by something similarly major, significant or powerful?
I can't understand how someone can get sucked into a hoax belief system based on the premise that every scientist and engineer in the world is either stupid or lying.
@straydog02 .... thing is wouldnt it be easy to trace where and who had possession or rock/wood? no one from nasa wants to connect those dots ... what a farce, the nauts handed it in glass to someone, and yet now it cant be found or discussed???
another set of lies exposed by moon hoax exposers ...
again to all, where are the LR trax under MANY pics, they cant
just vanish... I want that question aswered, no one ever can.
Nice pictures, i was 5 year at that moment.
Bassiedevalkparkiet 3 months ago
fake!
marktimmer2212 3 months ago
gelukkig was het allemaal maar een show. En niet eens echt.
TheVanGastel 3 months ago
Het landings gestel blijft achter op de maan, wat ascociaal zeg, rare amerikanen
536767676533766 3 months ago
volgens mij zou ik helemaal uit mijn dak gaan als ik zo'n lancering mee zou maken in het echt!
ArnoldVeeman 3 months ago
Kaas!
Diaprojector 3 months ago 5
@Diaprojector Saak
DinoDyl 3 months ago
Echt of niet, het zijn mooie beelden!!!!
DPCbullitproof1 3 months ago
ahahha comment war between straydog and rob xd
somerandomguyLOLzz 3 months ago
Straydog02: "I don't understand it, so it must be fake".
Rob260259 1 year ago
@stalkervision
"lurn"
"Of course"
"their will always be"
LOL
And where did your dots go...?
Rob260259 1 year ago
@stalkervision
Sure. NASA faked it all, using Disney for the simulations and we are all happy that some 'troof' seekers discovered that only those simulations were used. Man... you are awesome.
By the way; how's your 30 percent?
Rob260259 1 year ago
@stalkervision
Been watching Disney Channel again? Where did all the real time data come from? MC received all kinds of data from pressure, temperature, flow rates, fuel consumption, fuel tank level, etc. all in real time. The engineers who designed the equipment made predictions as to how it would perform. Who hoaxed the data? Data that was so good that it not only fooled the people who designed it, but all the people since who have looked at the data and not found any problems.
Rob260259 1 year ago
@Rob260259 .. Speaking of Disney, did you know that he was best buds with moonfaker Werhner von Braun? .. They invented their manned moon shot fantasy together and then handed it to Kubrick to film and direct.
Ever heard of SIMULATIONS, Rob? .. It was admitted to by Apollo Flight Director Gene Krantz that neither he, nor any of the boys at mission control could tell the difference between the SIMS and a "real" lunar landing...OOPS AGAIN.
Get a clue .. Then get a life.
straydog02 1 year ago
@straydog02
Still failing to ignore me... you're a sorry guy Duane.
Please give your source for that "OOPS" Straydog. I'm anxiously waiting to read all about it.
Rob260259 1 year ago
@straydog02
Aaah... Suddenly I get the whole idea... Disney produced those petrified moonrocks, gave them to a couple of hundred US ambassadors and then fooled all the scientists worldwide. Ofcourse!
Rob260259 1 year ago
@Rob260259
No, you don't get the idea .. The petrified wood "moon" rock was only given to the dumb Dutch folks.. The rest of the fake rocks came from moonfaker von Braun's geological expedition to Antarctica and a few might have been recovered in the high volcanic regions of Hawaii, where the astronots "trained" .. NASA built a lunar sample receiving lab in Houston, a couple of years before pretending to land men on the Moon.. Which means they had plenty of time to fake some "lunar" rocks.
straydog02 1 year ago
@straydog02
The extent to which the world has participated in the study of the Apollo samples clearly precludes any collusion, obfuscation or coercion. It's common use for conspiracists to claim that the Apollo Lunar samples are highly guarded by NASA and made available only to loyal researchers, but the facts do not bear this out.
Each year an independent peer review panel evaluates new research proposals, and curators mail out about 400 lunar samples to 40 to 50 scientists worldwide.
Rob260259 1 year ago
@straydog02
Some of the principle investigators of Lunar Samples: University of Cambridge, England, Geologic Survey, Canada, Australian University, Canberra, University of Berne, Switzerland, University of Cologne, Germany, the Max Planke Institute für Chemie in Mainz, Germany.
Oh yes, they have far more experience then those petrochemists here in Amsterdam, sure.
You seem to distort and twist a lot of facts that are in the public domain for many, many years.
Another epic fail Stray.
Rob260259 1 year ago
@Rob260259
Petrified wood, passed off on the dumb dutch, as coming from the Moon! ... TOO FUNNY!!!
Another epic fail, you dumb dutch apollogist troll.
straydog02 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@straydog02
Read it Duane.
"The tracking sites knew where their antennas were pointed and when they had data, etc. These questioners and conspiracists must think that we are stupid (hundreds of us that is); the data was recorded, archived and analyzed by dozens of engineers."
You do exactly the same as your look-a-like Stalkervision.
"Hey, I don't understand it, so it must be fake".
Thanks for the failure of not ignoring me and showing everyone how a hoaxhead reacts.
Rob260259 1 year ago
@straydog02
Oh die Amerikanen toch. Ze zullen het wel nooit begrijpen.
casdebom2 1 year ago 2
@straydog02 just go home stupid starwars freak
koen522 3 months ago
@straydog02
Really enjoyed the 'conversation' with MadHighway last night. Woow.. you and your hoax nut pals are a laugh. Please try again.
Rob260259 1 month ago
@straydog02
Well Stray? Still no sources for your "OOPS"...?
Fail.
Rob260259 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Rob260259
"Well Stray? Still no sources for your "OOPS"...?"
The source was apollo Flight Director Eugene Krantz in the documentary called 'Failure is Not an Option ! '
Gene let is slip that the SIMS were so realistic in every respect, that nobody at mission control, including himself , could tell the difference between a SIMULATED landing and a real landing.. Nothing like opening mouth and inserting foot while letting the hoax cat out of the bag!
Like I said before .. OOPS!
straydog02 1 year ago
@straydog02
Another source conveniently out of context... how predictable Duane. I'm not going to search for the interview in which Krantz told it.
You know who COULD tell the difference at MOCR? The guys that were the specialists amogst the engineers. Standby, I'll check that.
Rob260259 1 year ago
@Rob260259
Krantz's claim was not taken out of context , you game playing creep.. Those were his EXACT words .. Neither he, nor the anyone else at mission control, could tell the difference between a SIMULATED landing and a real one.. The lads at their monitors didn't have a freaking clue they were just looking at SIMS.
You could have worked for mission control during the Apollo fraud, since you don't have a freaking clue either, you brainwashed troll.
Failure is NOT an Option ! LOL
straydog02 1 year ago
@straydog02 calling other people brainwashed eh? if you just thought about it for a moment you'd come to the realisation that when one of two people having a conversation is brainwashed, neither person will be able to find out who it is.
rietveen26 3 months ago
@straydog02
"The simulations were good but far from being perfect and they always required some kluges that Pete Klapach or others had to fix each time we ran a simulation. The data flow paths were different and sequencing of data from the tracking sites, pre-processed into 2.4 kbps or I believe later 4.8 kbps bit streams. We did elaborate checkouts of these paths from the bird to a spot on our displays or event lights."
-cont-
Rob260259 1 year ago
@straydog02
"The tracking sites knew where their antennas were pointed and when they had data, etc. These questioners and conspiracists must think that we are stupid (hundreds of us that is); the data was recorded, archived and analyzed by dozens of engineers."
Sy Liebergot
You know who Liebergot was Duane?
Epic fail Stray.
Rob260259 1 year ago
dus jij gelooft niet dat deze mensen naar de maan zijn gegaan.
wat is je bewijs hierop
gino567 1 year ago
Tot de dag van vandaag de mooiste prestatie die de mens ooit geleverd heeft.
blackbird, het U2 spionagevliegtuig, spacelab, stuk voor stuk technologische hoogstandjes voor die tijd, en zelfs nog voor deze tijd.
IAmDonar 1 year ago
Mooi gemaakt dit, die stem maakt het wel helemaal nostalgisch hè? Iedereen weet dat niemand ooit een stap op de maan heeft gezet.
thomiduvigneau 1 year ago
Naar de maan konden wel, maar kleurentelevisie niet.. tuurlijk joh..
TMBofficialschannel 1 year ago
hoi? :D:D
sannyboy77 1 year ago
Comment removed
DJNielsvdRee 1 year ago
@DJNielsvdRee Omdat het heel duur is en niemand er het geld voor over heeft.
De Amerikanen hadden tegenover de wereld bewezen dat ze beter waren dan de Russen en dat was dat.
IAmDonar 1 year ago
@IAmDonar geloof jij ook nog in sinterklaas ? :D
DJNielsvdRee 1 year ago
@DJNielsvdRee Het zal waarschijnlijk een schok voor jou zijn, maar ik heb nog meer nieuws voor jou. De aarde is ook niet plat! Zo, en nu terug onder je steen voor de komende 300 jaar.
Sting0NL 1 year ago
@Sting0NL
Helemaal met je eens. Er zijn nog altijd figuren die denken dat ze slimmer zijn dan ingenieurs en wetenschappers. Zogenoemde 'truthseekers'. Alles wat op autoriteit of overheid lijkt wantrouwen ze. Een beetje paranoide denk ik.
Rob260259 1 year ago
@Rob260259 .. How do you say APOLLO WAS A SCAM / FRAUD / HOAX in Dutch?
Get a life you lying troll.
straydog02 1 year ago
@Rob260259 .. So where's the petrified wood "moon" rock those moonfakers presented to the Dutch Prime Minister?
I bet Buzz kept it in the same pocket he kept his "magic" pen ! .. You know the one that suppossedly launched the A11 LM .. Too bad his "magic" pen version of that "I saved the day" fairy tale, didn't match the original NASA fairy tale of Neil being instructed how to override that switch and rewire a new one.
Just another OOPS moment from the NEVER A STRAIGHT ANSWER swindlers.
straydog02 1 year ago
@straydog02
Ah. Duane. Nice to see you again. I see our Dutch connection made you pay a visit to a 'Dutch video'...LOL
Well Stray, it's been a while. How about all those other samples? I bet those petrochemists must have had an opportunity to examine their rocks...?
Tell me Duane, if NASA faked the missions, the last thing they would have done was give away obviously fake samples. It took a petrochemist in Amsterdam only a few minutes. But the Dutch are fast ofcourse...
Silly Duane...
Rob260259 1 year ago
@Rob260259 .... hey, rob watch all my vids and get back to me ...
the bank of lights, the one shaped in a rectangle???
the no tracks under the LR
again, email me at aol at this SN and next time i
get a moon show going on radio, I want you to
call in and debate ... so contact me, ok :)
pt1gard 1 year ago
@pt1gard
"debate"
What to debate about? The psychological tendency for people to think that a significant event must have been caused by something similarly major, significant or powerful?
I can't understand how someone can get sucked into a hoax belief system based on the premise that every scientist and engineer in the world is either stupid or lying.
Rob260259 1 year ago
@straydog02 .... thing is wouldnt it be easy to trace where and who had possession or rock/wood? no one from nasa wants to connect those dots ... what a farce, the nauts handed it in glass to someone, and yet now it cant be found or discussed???
another set of lies exposed by moon hoax exposers ...
again to all, where are the LR trax under MANY pics, they cant
just vanish... I want that question aswered, no one ever can.
pt1gard 1 year ago
@straydog02
What did you do Duane, pushed the Help-Button?
LOL
Rob260259 1 year ago
@DJNielsvdRee Het kost heel veel geld. Er is niets meer te zoeken. Mars is de volgende stap.
WouterNed 3 months ago