Thank you for your reply mate! It's a pitty.Anyway lucky there are lots of other special sort like jetfighters in Russia, the States and Europe.Take care!
I've only heard the continents named South America and North America... odd
When's the last time you heard somebody in either of these continents refer to themselves as America or Americans besides the United States of America??
@AzebuLegend last time i checked, North America consisted of Canada, the lower 48 United states(Alaska and Hawaii) and what we call "Central America". BTW any 2nd grader with a world map could tell u that, but im gonna guess u didnt make it outta kindergarten?
may i remind you that russia has most off all high tech weapons from the cold war even a 60 megaton nuclear bomb that can blow a cuntry such as united states of america of a map so lets not he hatefull becouse at the end civilians will suffer the most :S
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Just so happens that the F-22 is the pinical of aviation as we know it right now. Durring teasting they put it up against 5 F-15 which have the best combat record in aviation history, and the F-22 got a lock on every single F-15 before they even lnew it was there, and wouldve shot them all down if it wasn't a simulation. It's funny you Russians have bone yards full of aircarft and tanks that will never see battle cause Russia is a broke joke. Peace pussys
russian airforce is about numbers. strategy is for every f-22 raptor there are multiple su-35, su-37 and mig-35 fighters. plus the use long range sam systems such as S-400 to provide a protective umbrella.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
People here don't know what there talking about The F-22. Is way better than any Russian jet It acually is manufactured It has 3 times the thrust It accually caries weopons It has vectoring thrust It has a higher ceiling It has more carrying capacity It has better electronic equipment The list goes on and on but I can't load anymore than what I have Best of all the F-22 is made in America
"The US has pushed the F-22 program forward after the Cold War to counter the new Flanker threat, what is supposed to be is the next generation fighter that is supposed to be a new generation in stealth fighters, but the truth is its fat, slower than the 26 year old Russian Flanker(Mig-29) and expensive." I can show more Infos :D but that won't be nice for F-22Craptor Fans
@Mr462873 ya 4ot ne ponemaju po4emu ty mne eta pishesh! Ja znaju sto Rossija na mnogo silneje 4em Amerika. Amerikanskij Samaljoty dermo litushije a vot nashi...eta pervi klassnij istribiteli.
What Russian jets are you talking about? The Flankers and Fulcrums that sit idle in fields because the Russians are too broke to fly them? Or this SU-47, which will never go into regular production?
Sous 47 flying laboratory on it test all workings out for the future planes,note more.One time when Russian and Americans were at war in air, it in Vietnam after America has suffered bad losses they have ceased to fly.
personally i think the f22 would win in a fight. its faster and its stealth. plus it can jam radar. so yeah. but this plane is definatly beast. why wont they put it in service already. its been 9 years
I love these little F-22 vs Su-47 arguments. They're comparing a proven combat aircraft to a technology demonstrator in a 1 on 1 dogfight. That's just like comparing the F-22 to early American stealth prototypes in a measure of stealth capability. It really isn't a fair contest.
However, I believe that the potential of the Su-47's design has barely been tapped. Who knows what its successors will be capable of?
First Flight (YF-22) 29 September 1990 (F-22A) 7 September 1997 Service Entry15 December 2005 CREW: one: pilot ESTIMATED COST:$142 million [2008$] AIRFOIL SECTIONS: Wing Root NACA 64A?05.92 Wing TipNACA 64A?04.29 DIMENSIONS: Length 62.08 ft (18.92 m) Wingspan 44.50 ft (13.56 m) Height 16.42 ft (5.00 m) Wing Area 838 ft˛ (78.0 m˛)
this plan is shit you can hear those wing scraping the sky's not sliding threw them the f-22 could easily destroy that thing no competition that aircraft may be extremely agile but dosent have stealth or proper aerodynamics
@artilistic s37 is faster beter and all HISTORY: First Flight 25 September 1997 CREW: one: pilot ESTIMATED COST:probably $50 million+ AIRFOIL SECTIONS:Wing Root unknown DIMENSIONS: Length 72.83 ft (22.60 m) Wingspan 74.00 ft (16.70 m) Height 19.33 ft (5.90 m) Wing Area 666 ft˛ (62.0 m˛) WEIGHTS: Empty unknown Normal Takeoff 57,320 lb (26,000 kg) Max Takeoff 74,955 lb (34,000 kg)
In reality the F-22 could shoot down an su-37 or 47 flanker before they knew they were their.. but americans have to visibly identify a target before they shoot. They are more than capable of shooting an aircraft down without them ever seeing it.
@thebluemaggot the technology was first developed by the germans in ww2 but they didnt have the fly by wire systems that we have now so it wasnt an effective design... it wasnt till the 80s we had computers powerful enough to keep this unstable platform stable
Yeah! If If it's reader see it first.Heard of stealth technology? Face it! You lost the cold war! Amecica owns the sky! Su 47 is a very good construction but if You really wanna talk about air combat try PAK FA. Then we might talk...
Lol, you actually think American aircraft could match this work of art, for instance the F-22, it stands no chance against the Su-47, but the Su-37 is an even better project, if the F-22 was behind the Su-47, the Su-47 could turn around and face the F-22 in 6 to 8 seconds and fire away, this plane can also stop in midair, and it has extreme manuvability, it doesn't need stealth, in my opinion no aircraft could match the Sukhoi, and guess what, I'm not Russian, I'm American and I say this.
F-22 is ready fighter. SU-47 is just experimental fighter... "Su-37 is an even better project"
SU-37 projest has been dead years already.
"and it has extreme manuvability, it doesn't need stealth"
Manuvability is important only in dogfight... most planes nowdays have been shotdown during the BVR battle. Small RCS is necessary in modern air battle.
Wrong you are about the SU-37, and plus yes it is only important in a dogfight BECAUSE isn't that what we're talking about here, F-22 vs Su-47, ohyes I believe it is, I know the Su-47 is an experimental, I'm not stupid, but once its complete it should be a better project than any other fighter known to man. Note i said FIGHTER not ATTACKER.
hey marco im american and im not putting ur plane down i think its cool i wish i could afford it but in reality the f22 is way more advanced and its been out for 15 years we now have magnetised propolsion systems which make turbines look like props
X-29 during the 70's had been tested on all points and the experiment came out unproductive specially on high speed. both wings fail. the only reason russia wants this forward swept wing is its agility features but very unstable, when you look at its frontal cannard its always moving due to unstable feature.
thats why they wasted money ending up a tech demonstrator only. but wait for PAK FA, it wont be a forward swept wing... more likely an F-22 or hollywoods FIREFOX plane it will be.
first of all u dont know shit about aircraft design. have you ever heard of the Eurofighter typhoon? go look it up and how sits been designed. please u americans just making ursels look more stupid by trying to put it down. i cant wait to see an entire wing of these babies fly.
@ganarzon I hope that it won't come to future wars. That's the way we should be thinking.
Sure the discussion is ample and double-sided, I'll agree. But we're sure making a war industry proud and confident here with all these silly "ooh my daddy is bigger than your daddy" comments.
Too bad this is a technology demonstration jet. It will never be put into production. And if you think the Russians are so clever with the forward swept wings you should look up the X-29. The US did the whole forward swept wings thing years ago.
Too bad these wings were falling apart at high speeds. Su47 was built to test and show that Russia has superior tech, and it's wings aint falling apart - everything works. Su 47 was just a test model for T50 Pak FA, one of mods u'll see this november.
It is rumored that the Su-47 recently suffered some manner of wing failure during testing. Western analysts speculate that Sukhoi engineers have restored the prototype to a swept-wing layout. Apparently, engineers reached the same conclusions with regard to the viability of a forward-swept layout as their counterparts at Grumman did twenty years ago with the X-29. Therefore, it is likely that any derivative production aircraft based on Su-47 research will utilize a conventional wing layout.
i kind of doubt that the government would fork over 100 billion dollars for a useless aircraft. seriously...everone thinks they're an expert these days.
they are havin issues with the forward swept wing. its almost pure carbon composites and titanium. issues with stress loading and shit. not lookin like the FSW will be used anytime soon on a combat aircraft, just too complicated
Oh my god piss of you America up the ass wankers. The SU 47 is brilliant and you're all jealous. Most of you know nothing of advanced military engineering and you're in no place to talk bullocks. Give the Russians some bloody respect.
I can explain. SU-47 is a prototype for the much better aircraft, we will not use it in our army but may be we will use SU-47MK. Yes you right, it is hard to use such a wings, but not for the Russians.
Yes, they also said they are not sure about reverse wings, because there are lot of stress on the edges during high speed, they said they might come back to delta wings design.
This is old video, afik they are already back to delta, shell check some news there.
The Su-47 is actually a crazy piece of work. Forward swept wings are dynamically unstable, meaning that when you turn the aircraft the wings are flexed in a direction that make it turn even harder. Because of this it doesn't quite need thrust vectoring to do the same maneuvers seen with the F-22 or Su-37. This comes at a cost of a very expensive, complicated, composite material wing that, by requirement, is so strong the aircraft can pull 9-10g's without a hint of fatigue.
However, the aircrafts maneuverability is offset by a greatly limited top speed. A high speed dash eventually damaged the wing structure of the prototype because of the airflow trying to twist the wingtips upward and downward.
I mean, im just bored of people like you trying to show up and say tales about things such as SU-47 and T-90. I suppose, you can explain its features only if you are a constructor or a pilot/driver, not a YouTube visitor.
only at high enough altitude to recover from pugachev's cobra. f-22 is not vtol or stovl, that's f-35. and f-18 held the record for slowest flying non-vtol jet aircraft in the world with 98mph.
first they made a prototype and flew it , then for some time they kinda abandonned it in favor if generation 4+ and 4++ technology but they resumed reaserch quite intensly now...
f-22 would destroy this simply because this plane is an athlete whereas the f-22 is like a sniper, the f-22 can lock on, fire and turn around before the enemy even knew he was there...the su-47 would never see it coming, but he could die pulling a cool maneuver!
ok Yes the F-22 Can fire over the Horizon and yes the F-22 is pretty much invisible But this is a good player for the F-22 this is what we are going to have to worry about when the missiles fail and your starring at his After burner. When the skill from the Pilot actually matter is when this will be a threat.
while i understand what you're thinking here, the likely hood that and f-22's missles don't work is absolutely crazy, and even if one did...he has a wing man. i understand the potential threat here, but i honestly don't think that if an f-15 has ever been shot down that an f-22 is any more likely because of a very quick little show-off plane!
you can beam missiles to shake of their locks really easily....by flying perpendicular to the radar beam. this is why in soooooo MANY dog fights (with two modern jets, post 1960's) long range missiles get exhausted and the fight comes down to side-winders and guns
except the f-22 uses QAAMs and SAAMs which r close to near impossible to shake, unless one pulls G's that would knock one unconscious. if u want to see these missiles in use, buy the Ace Combat game and use them, they are extremely unfair weapons to use, but when it's down to life or death...oh well!
that's a BAD simulator...the only sim i trust is Lock On modern air combat...because it doesn't use any planes that don't have performance data and envolope data released for...so there's no f 22 in any real simulator.
every missile can pull more g's than a human...you don't "shake" missiles...you shake the lock by beaming (turning your vector so it's perpendicular to the radar beam)
i know, and that's true on avoiding missiles, just not these...these 2 missiles are not only locked on by the initial lock, but also the lock from AWACS and satellite, so the missiles literally turn around and will continue to follow its target until it hits or runs out of fuel...just as an fyi, i live with an air force pilot and have spoken with F-22 pilots...not trying to brag, just that i know this stuff because i've spoken to the people who absolutely know this by heart
i was actually wondering about that randomdude10010, about external locks other than the jet that fired the missile. i know that F22's can shared locks as well...but keep in mind that the mig-25 could do that back in the 80's.....so i'm sure those russians have some aiwacs and sats they can use too. another thing, the missile can't just "turn around", cause it might run out of fuel, it also slows it down....like missiles have always been, the biggest factor is the position the plane fired from
the position of the firing plane used to be the factor back when missiles flew straight or slightly sideways, but now we have missile programming that allows the missile to strike from above, since the plane has more surface area than straight on with it, and yes of course the russians have some sort of advanced radar, but the F-22 has gone through nearly 200 different radar systems simply because the first couple of hundred weren't overly advanced enough
i know rite! i let three col's and one gen see it and they were all impressed with it's attention to detail...i think only two of them weren't pilots!
The public make the f-22 sound like such a powerful aircraft. As a matter of fact, it hasn't had confirmed military kills. To me, it's just a plane that is fast and stealthy nothing more nothing less. The plane in the same league in maneuverability with the Raptor is the Su-37.
it has no air-to-air kills since we are not in battle with anyone with an air force, but it does have ground kills under its belt, not much talk about it other than on the military channel when they talked about it
Man...man...man...you dont know nothing abut planes but you think you are so smart...SU37,47,30MK,35...dont fly like stupid..they fly with MIG31...why?? Because he has the best aircraft radar Zaslon...he give them fucken informations about sky in front of them...an just...YES ZASLON can track F22... xD
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW INCREBLE PLANE VIVA RUSSIA NUMBER ONE !!!!!
TIERNITOBB 3 months ago
who glued the wing on back to front?
3nasacova 5 months ago
Any one knows whos the regular Su47 test pilot?
mauricioalfredo83 5 months ago
To all my Russians friends and other global aviation fans, I was asking myself if the Su-47 is still active?
longsweep1 6 months ago
@longsweep1 "I was asking myself if the Su-47 is still active? " The SU-47 was never active and the project has been shelved for several years now.
thebluemaggot 3 months ago
@thebluemaggot
Thank you for your reply mate! It's a pitty.Anyway lucky there are lots of other special sort like jetfighters in Russia, the States and Europe.Take care!
longsweep1 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
dear santa...
ERICCHENG9933 7 months ago
I wish the video was in english or subtitled in english other than that it's a cool video!
guitarjon01 11 months ago
zivela Russia !!!
1968drale 1 year ago 4
@discountninjuh Yeah because the pilot is usually full of Vodka and rotten smelly cabbage.
jethromayham 1 year ago
@jethromayham
umm thats a stereotype
PaperPlanes1997 9 months ago
some people think its "advanced technology" just because of it's reversed wing design. this plane has got to be at least 10 years old.
SurestPlayer 1 year ago
man these Sukoi truely are beautiful to watch, they're like the rally cars in the sky the way they can slide
ToeCutter454 1 year ago 3
I LIKE TWIST AIRCRAFT TO ARGENTINA IN THE AIR FORCE, PROPOSE TO MAY GOVERNMENT PLEASE !!! SO BEATIFY AIRCRAFT!!!!
maximo8282 1 year ago
It put on a great show....We should all invest in a su47 and an f22 and put on shows with glass missles with paint inside hehe
FreeGunKNIGHT 1 year ago
its simply the sole aircraft produced is an advanced technology demonstrator for the forward-swept wing
Hatinonthehaters 1 year ago
RUSSIA FOREVER #1
USA (GRINGOLAND) IS A SHIT
AzebuLegend 1 year ago
@AzebuLegend
a...mexican nazi?
anyway if its so shit why do millions of mexicans flee to america???
OlderG0ds 1 year ago
@OlderG0ds america is not a country is a continent
america has 35 countries... brainwashed gringo
AzebuLegend 1 year ago
@AzebuLegend
I've only heard the continents named South America and North America... odd
When's the last time you heard somebody in either of these continents refer to themselves as America or Americans besides the United States of America??
OlderG0ds 1 year ago
@OlderG0ds cuz ur a brainwashed gringo, go to google and search "america" and see the pictures
35 countries.
America, Africa, Asia, Europe, Oceania, Antartica
AzebuLegend 1 year ago
@AzebuLegend
lol you think there are 6 continents
Sure I'm the "brainwashed gringo" but you're still a tarded mexican.
OlderG0ds 1 year ago
@OlderG0ds "USAF" United States Air Force, NOT AMERICAN AIRFORCE...
AzebuLegend 1 year ago
@AzebuLegend last time i checked, North America consisted of Canada, the lower 48 United states(Alaska and Hawaii) and what we call "Central America". BTW any 2nd grader with a world map could tell u that, but im gonna guess u didnt make it outta kindergarten?
ToeCutter454 1 year ago
Planes been scrapped,It was a testbed nothing more.....R.I.P Mr. Su-47 Berkut
tossingmidgetsforfun 1 year ago
zivela rusija
MrLickivuk 1 year ago
FireFox! Is that Clint Eastwood flying it?
billyhunchback 1 year ago
people sound so tough over the internet lol.
Bottom line- Russia had amazing planes, USA has amazing planes.
With that said, can't we all just get along?
TheEgoFanBoy 1 year ago 8
uf'fdyto adiscorosnicchia aprocaliia y yhi amerivan
TheEmiaix 1 year ago
may i remind you that russia has most off all high tech weapons from the cold war even a 60 megaton nuclear bomb that can blow a cuntry such as united states of america of a map so lets not he hatefull becouse at the end civilians will suffer the most :S
oXygen2000slo 1 year ago
why the conflict????
htirah100 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In real F-22 is more brand advertising than the present 5-generation fighter.Level Su-37. This corresponds to the 4-generation fighter.
bonbon796 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Just so happens that the F-22 is the pinical of aviation as we know it right now. Durring teasting they put it up against 5 F-15 which have the best combat record in aviation history, and the F-22 got a lock on every single F-15 before they even lnew it was there, and wouldve shot them all down if it wasn't a simulation. It's funny you Russians have bone yards full of aircarft and tanks that will never see battle cause Russia is a broke joke. Peace pussys
DES3RTfox8 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In the war in Yugoslavia, even old MiGs shot newer F-15 and B-2 stells.T-50 is not inferior to the parameters of the F-22. In some superior.
bonbon796 1 year ago
russian airforce is about numbers. strategy is for every f-22 raptor there are multiple su-35, su-37 and mig-35 fighters. plus the use long range sam systems such as S-400 to provide a protective umbrella.
immortal4942 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
rginter123 2 years ago
It's very interesting fighter.
turbojet is very heavy, ~2500 kg.
And have thrust only 15500... It's too little for fighter 5 generation
KvazargiuS 2 years ago
"The US has pushed the F-22 program forward after the Cold War to counter the new Flanker threat, what is supposed to be is the next generation fighter that is supposed to be a new generation in stealth fighters, but the truth is its fat, slower than the 26 year old Russian Flanker(Mig-29) and expensive." I can show more Infos :D but that won't be nice for F-22Craptor Fans
SovjetPhoenix 2 years ago
RUSSIA FUCK AMERICA UNDERSTAND BITH
Mr462873 2 years ago
@Mr462873 ya 4ot ne ponemaju po4emu ty mne eta pishesh! Ja znaju sto Rossija na mnogo silneje 4em Amerika. Amerikanskij Samaljoty dermo litushije a vot nashi...eta pervi klassnij istribiteli.
Nasrat na ameriku, oni neznajut s kem oni ebutsa.
SovjetPhoenix 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SovjetPhoenix probably he Russophobe. because he wrote .This may seem impossible in any other country.but today in Russia there are many.
bonbon796 1 year ago
is the su 47 any good in stealth because if its not how could you compare it to the f22
MultiGoodKid 2 years ago
F-22 and F-35 are useless crap...they can be used against Pirates but not against russian Jets!
Just look--->>> watch?v=5N0iXFN37iU
SovjetPhoenix 2 years ago 2
What Russian jets are you talking about? The Flankers and Fulcrums that sit idle in fields because the Russians are too broke to fly them? Or this SU-47, which will never go into regular production?
ginsunh 2 years ago
russian garbage...
winged70bbody2 2 years ago
Sous 47 flying laboratory on it test all workings out for the future planes,note more.One time when Russian and Americans were at war in air, it in Vietnam after America has suffered bad losses they have ceased to fly.
BodyLove1981 2 years ago
joy to watch, King of the air, a fabulous machine.
michalthelion 2 years ago
personally i think the f22 would win in a fight. its faster and its stealth. plus it can jam radar. so yeah. but this plane is definatly beast. why wont they put it in service already. its been 9 years
ValkyrieDude7070 2 years ago
I love these little F-22 vs Su-47 arguments. They're comparing a proven combat aircraft to a technology demonstrator in a 1 on 1 dogfight. That's just like comparing the F-22 to early American stealth prototypes in a measure of stealth capability. It really isn't a fair contest.
However, I believe that the potential of the Su-47's design has barely been tapped. Who knows what its successors will be capable of?
ButtersStotch7000 2 years ago
yes...thank you...su-47 also looks like a brick with a boomarang ducktaped on it
winged70bbody2 2 years ago
SU-47 is just experimental fighter... nothing more.
MokomaSusi 2 years ago
Exactly, but the planes that follow it may be incredible aircraft.
ButtersStotch7000 2 years ago
f22 is older and not soo god
fraqson 2 years ago
PROPULSION:
Powerplant two Pratt & Whitney F119-100 afterburning turbofans
Thrust 70,000 lb (310 kN)
PERFORMANCE:
Max Level Speed at altitude: 1,355 mph (2,180 km/h) at 30,000 ft (9,150 m), Mach 2 [afterburner]
1,070 mph (1,725 km/h) at 30,000 ft (9,150 m), Mach 1.6 [supercruise]
at sea level: 920 mph (1,480 km/h), Mach 1.2
Initial Climb Rate unknown
fraqson 2 years ago
fraqson 2 years ago
fraqson 2 years ago
projected by A.K. ehehe when i was youn I was drawing planes like this
fraqson 2 years ago
i do love the su 37 i must add im not just hating on Russians i am Russian by blood
artilistic 2 years ago
this plan is shit you can hear those wing scraping the sky's not sliding threw them the f-22 could easily destroy that thing no competition that aircraft may be extremely agile but dosent have stealth or proper aerodynamics
artilistic 2 years ago
fraqson 2 years ago
im sorry im not getting what your trying to say? are you saying the su-37 is better? and if so read my comment i said i like the su 37 better anyway
artilistic 2 years ago
But dont get me wrong i love the su-37.... Pak t-50.. sick plane also.
StarsAndStraps4E 2 years ago
In reality the F-22 could shoot down an su-37 or 47 flanker before they knew they were their.. but americans have to visibly identify a target before they shoot. They are more than capable of shooting an aircraft down without them ever seeing it.
StarsAndStraps4E 2 years ago
Very beautiful, high technology
Mrntduong 2 years ago 24
@Mrntduong It's very nice, I like!!
rotorpilot82 1 year ago
@Mrntduong actually it's tech from the 80's
thebluemaggot 1 year ago
@thebluemaggot the technology was first developed by the germans in ww2 but they didnt have the fly by wire systems that we have now so it wasnt an effective design... it wasnt till the 80s we had computers powerful enough to keep this unstable platform stable
DJBO55 3 months ago
@Mrntduong Yep, as the guy below said, this is 30 year old technology , good job russia.
colbyrules8 9 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Napoleon, Gitler , Ssaaakashvili ...Amerika you will be next!
qaztehio 2 years ago
it's people like you that make us hate russia... it takes one bad apple to spoil the whole friggin bunch
sergeant137 2 years ago 9
This comment has received too many negative votes show
hahahaha!!! Good luck with F-22...
maciek628 2 years ago
LOL!
Su 47 destroy fucking f 22
qaztehio 2 years ago
Comment removed
maciek628 2 years ago
Yeah! If If it's reader see it first.Heard of stealth technology? Face it! You lost the cold war! Amecica owns the sky! Su 47 is a very good construction but if You really wanna talk about air combat try PAK FA. Then we might talk...
maciek628 2 years ago
Comment removed
munruthel1 2 years ago
Lol, you actually think American aircraft could match this work of art, for instance the F-22, it stands no chance against the Su-47, but the Su-37 is an even better project, if the F-22 was behind the Su-47, the Su-47 could turn around and face the F-22 in 6 to 8 seconds and fire away, this plane can also stop in midair, and it has extreme manuvability, it doesn't need stealth, in my opinion no aircraft could match the Sukhoi, and guess what, I'm not Russian, I'm American and I say this.
munruthel1 2 years ago
"F-22, it stands no chance against the Su-47, "
F-22 is ready fighter. SU-47 is just experimental fighter... "Su-37 is an even better project"
SU-37 projest has been dead years already.
"and it has extreme manuvability, it doesn't need stealth"
Manuvability is important only in dogfight... most planes nowdays have been shotdown during the BVR battle. Small RCS is necessary in modern air battle.
MokomaSusi 2 years ago
Wrong you are about the SU-37, and plus yes it is only important in a dogfight BECAUSE isn't that what we're talking about here, F-22 vs Su-47, ohyes I believe it is, I know the Su-47 is an experimental, I'm not stupid, but once its complete it should be a better project than any other fighter known to man. Note i said FIGHTER not ATTACKER.
munruthel1 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
YOU ARE DEAD WRONG. The F-22 Will beat the Burkut in every way. USAF IS THE BEST.
USSWISCONSIN64 2 years ago
USAF AND YOU ITS SHIT.
Mr462873 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You and what army. Russia can get their asses kick by us so bad that they will shit in their pants. FUCK RUSSIA!!!!!
USSWISCONSIN64 2 years ago
f47 the best understand
Mr462873 2 years ago
sorry su47
Mr462873 2 years ago
no the F22 would do circles around one without even hitting afterburner..
MyGamer1 2 years ago
we rather deal with russia than cuba on the real
ihatestupidfilters 2 years ago
russia should just takeover cuba im sure the US wouldnt mind
ihatestupidfilters 2 years ago
hey marco im american and im not putting ur plane down i think its cool i wish i could afford it but in reality the f22 is way more advanced and its been out for 15 years we now have magnetised propolsion systems which make turbines look like props
ihatestupidfilters 2 years ago
out for 15 years? came in service in 2004..still not that good after the crush that killed the pilot
SAMTOMAS 2 years ago
X-29 during the 70's had been tested on all points and the experiment came out unproductive specially on high speed. both wings fail. the only reason russia wants this forward swept wing is its agility features but very unstable, when you look at its frontal cannard its always moving due to unstable feature.
thats why they wasted money ending up a tech demonstrator only. but wait for PAK FA, it wont be a forward swept wing... more likely an F-22 or hollywoods FIREFOX plane it will be.
ganarzon 2 years ago
first of all u dont know shit about aircraft design. have you ever heard of the Eurofighter typhoon? go look it up and how sits been designed. please u americans just making ursels look more stupid by trying to put it down. i cant wait to see an entire wing of these babies fly.
marco0798 2 years ago
typhoon flies along with F-22 and F-35 in future wars... count on that. NATO is a very formidable power in europe.
we dont have much to argue about.
ganarzon 2 years ago 3
@ganarzon I hope that it won't come to future wars. That's the way we should be thinking.
Sure the discussion is ample and double-sided, I'll agree. But we're sure making a war industry proud and confident here with all these silly "ooh my daddy is bigger than your daddy" comments.
AdrianMuravey 1 year ago
The air craft looks like crap, they need a better colur on their planes xD
Stiflerm92 2 years ago
Planes aren't meant to look pretty.
agentfazexx 2 years ago
Too bad this is a technology demonstration jet. It will never be put into production. And if you think the Russians are so clever with the forward swept wings you should look up the X-29. The US did the whole forward swept wings thing years ago.
disturbedone5009 2 years ago
Too bad these wings were falling apart at high speeds. Su47 was built to test and show that Russia has superior tech, and it's wings aint falling apart - everything works. Su 47 was just a test model for T50 Pak FA, one of mods u'll see this november.
MrRein1988 2 years ago
It is rumored that the Su-47 recently suffered some manner of wing failure during testing. Western analysts speculate that Sukhoi engineers have restored the prototype to a swept-wing layout. Apparently, engineers reached the same conclusions with regard to the viability of a forward-swept layout as their counterparts at Grumman did twenty years ago with the X-29. Therefore, it is likely that any derivative production aircraft based on Su-47 research will utilize a conventional wing layout.
disturbedone5009 2 years ago 3
We'll see.
It is obvious that Sukhoi are leading in this field of tech (backswept wings). I am sure they'll figure something out :)
MrRein1988 2 years ago
In what way are they "leading in this field of tech"?
disturbedone5009 2 years ago 4
I'm little confused, can you do the phugachev cobra with su 47 berkut?
DeOptimist 2 years ago
i kind of doubt that the government would fork over 100 billion dollars for a useless aircraft. seriously...everone thinks they're an expert these days.
taterfamine 2 years ago
Su-47 the best.
Hjvfnb 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
EN ESE MISMO: DIOS CREADOR.
macabela22 2 years ago
Creo en DIOS CREADOR
macabela22 2 years ago
orale wey!!! ni lo uno ni lo otro, todo lo contrario..soy CREYENTE, no soy religioso.
macabela22 2 years ago
i am fronm el coño de tu madre.Usa ass hole
macabela22 2 years ago
Where is right sound chanel?
ourmoney 2 years ago
we all know russias airforce can kill us
usmcsniper2015 2 years ago 6
I from Moscow, and on my sight Boeing 747 am looked much more beautifully:))
interflug 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There are 2 kinds of fighter aircraft,targets and Stealth...
Which would you want to be???
ClarksonsinUSA 2 years ago
It has a great design. but i think the Terminator Su-37 is more reliable.
11kman1 2 years ago 3
The wings are so thin... it has perfect aerodynamics. Besides, it's time someone tried something new.
iwearwoodlandcamo 2 years ago
Amazing looking plane - it looks like something out of Ring Raiders :D
smithers72 2 years ago
1:30 - Fly-by-wire + OVT + Canards Working. Cool...
aceperee 2 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
russian fags.
bradstoy94 2 years ago
Comment removed
RussianMan13 2 years ago
they are havin issues with the forward swept wing. its almost pure carbon composites and titanium. issues with stress loading and shit. not lookin like the FSW will be used anytime soon on a combat aircraft, just too complicated
Pirofutura 2 years ago
Орлёнок учится летать...)))
Korsak133 2 years ago
is this in russia
32venom 2 years ago
i want to be a pilot n drive one of these jets but i dont wanna kill
basoooooka 2 years ago
Yep, will be Sukhoi PAK-FA is next gen fight. Delta wing using MIG 1.44 technologies combined with Sukhoi 47
Hashishtani 2 years ago
Oh my god piss of you America up the ass wankers. The SU 47 is brilliant and you're all jealous. Most of you know nothing of advanced military engineering and you're in no place to talk bullocks. Give the Russians some bloody respect.
LubricatedBeat 2 years ago
I think this plane looks better in a black-pink paint scheme, what you guys think?
razgriz7 2 years ago
I can explain. SU-47 is a prototype for the much better aircraft, we will not use it in our army but may be we will use SU-47MK. Yes you right, it is hard to use such a wings, but not for the Russians.
Sperrowman 2 years ago
Yes, they also said they are not sure about reverse wings, because there are lot of stress on the edges during high speed, they said they might come back to delta wings design.
This is old video, afik they are already back to delta, shell check some news there.
Hashishtani 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
More or less an X-29 copy. Just years more advanced. no match for the F22 as much as people like to say otherwise.
WakeUpDummies 2 years ago
no wonder, it has canards
Haispan3 2 years ago
How come this plane never went into production? Seems wastly superior compared to the Raptor and MiG
Madsacre92 2 years ago
It's still in experimental stages. It was only introduced 1.5 years ago.
RazorAceYU 2 years ago
No, I think it was longer. I think Sukhoi is also trying to make sure the thing is perfectly built so it won't require too much matenince.
Malice2007 2 years ago
it was intrduced in 2000 mean 9 years ago.
SAMTOMAS 2 years ago
It's experimental model to test new technologies, it will never be in a production.
lookslikesquirrel 2 years ago
imagin if that thing had thrust vectoring like the Su-37
RideRed255 2 years ago
I'm pretty sure it does have thrust vectoring.
HelmutVillam 2 years ago 4
thrust vectoring made this plane obsolete.
gregrutz 2 years ago
this palne has thrust vectoring
azulsuave 2 years ago
The Su-47 is actually a crazy piece of work. Forward swept wings are dynamically unstable, meaning that when you turn the aircraft the wings are flexed in a direction that make it turn even harder. Because of this it doesn't quite need thrust vectoring to do the same maneuvers seen with the F-22 or Su-37. This comes at a cost of a very expensive, complicated, composite material wing that, by requirement, is so strong the aircraft can pull 9-10g's without a hint of fatigue.
Ranzear 2 years ago 7
However, the aircrafts maneuverability is offset by a greatly limited top speed. A high speed dash eventually damaged the wing structure of the prototype because of the airflow trying to twist the wingtips upward and downward.
Ranzear 2 years ago 6
On which sources you base your statements? Im sure you don't know a lot about this and only showing up.
TechnoBite 2 years ago
Engineering student.
Go back to your level 58 Undead Rogue.
Ranzear 2 years ago
"58 Undead Rogue" Whatta hell is this?
I mean, im just bored of people like you trying to show up and say tales about things such as SU-47 and T-90. I suppose, you can explain its features only if you are a constructor or a pilot/driver, not a YouTube visitor.
TechnoBite 2 years ago
Engineering student, aircraft mechanic. I wrote a paper on the American forward-swept-wing design, the Grumman X-29.
Was telling you to go back to your games (World of Warcraft).
Ranzear 2 years ago
People:Russian plane,Russian video,Russian language!
Talk about Usaf planes somewhere else,OK?
No one here cares about whorenet of craptor or falling falcon,got it?
RiseOfShadowEmpire 2 years ago 3
only at high enough altitude to recover from pugachev's cobra. f-22 is not vtol or stovl, that's f-35. and f-18 held the record for slowest flying non-vtol jet aircraft in the world with 98mph.
RezViper 2 years ago
did that plane just defeat f-18's low speed record?
RezViper 2 years ago
what low speed record, the f-22 can fly as slow as you want, stop even.
gregrutz 2 years ago
woop-de-doo. Have a medal
HelmutVillam 2 years ago
SU-47 rulz, luckily you can play it in Tom Clancys Hawx ^-^
warmadkiller 2 years ago 4
俄罗斯的金雕
jpljpl1987 2 years ago 2
Это самый красивый истрибитель, что я видел)) надеюсь идеи и концепии этого самолета еще вернуЦа в производство, а пока ждем ПакФА
RIO1987RUSgosu 2 years ago 4
lol the sign of this russian tv chanel loocks like the sign of a german tv chanel(ARD)^^
serjtankianandco 2 years ago
yea thats right maybe it was so
rapschit 2 years ago
Russians still marked their flights (and other military equipment) using big red star.Wonder why...? :-)
maraz26 2 years ago
becouse even tho it isnt the USSR it is still the red airforce
SonarWavePulse 2 years ago
Why is there only 1 Su-47? It's a great and unique plane...
JekaZMD 2 years ago
first they made a prototype and flew it , then for some time they kinda abandonned it in favor if generation 4+ and 4++ technology but they resumed reaserch quite intensly now...
SonarWavePulse 2 years ago
Whats the "downside" of forward-swept wings?
XR6Charged 2 years ago
the rotational forces on the wing tend to wanna twist the wings off unlike aft swept wings
oskeet411 2 years ago
f 22 sucks
rodmikz 3 years ago
The f-22 is proven your a dumbass
Umpalompa1232 3 years ago
proven against who?
Crazylalalalala 2 years ago
es un fierrazo...
maccito 3 years ago
f-22 would destroy this simply because this plane is an athlete whereas the f-22 is like a sniper, the f-22 can lock on, fire and turn around before the enemy even knew he was there...the su-47 would never see it coming, but he could die pulling a cool maneuver!
randomdude10010 3 years ago
ok Yes the F-22 Can fire over the Horizon and yes the F-22 is pretty much invisible But this is a good player for the F-22 this is what we are going to have to worry about when the missiles fail and your starring at his After burner. When the skill from the Pilot actually matter is when this will be a threat.
fa22fa14 3 years ago
while i understand what you're thinking here, the likely hood that and f-22's missles don't work is absolutely crazy, and even if one did...he has a wing man. i understand the potential threat here, but i honestly don't think that if an f-15 has ever been shot down that an f-22 is any more likely because of a very quick little show-off plane!
randomdude10010 3 years ago
you can beam missiles to shake of their locks really easily....by flying perpendicular to the radar beam. this is why in soooooo MANY dog fights (with two modern jets, post 1960's) long range missiles get exhausted and the fight comes down to side-winders and guns
SwampAshHSS 2 years ago
except the f-22 uses QAAMs and SAAMs which r close to near impossible to shake, unless one pulls G's that would knock one unconscious. if u want to see these missiles in use, buy the Ace Combat game and use them, they are extremely unfair weapons to use, but when it's down to life or death...oh well!
randomdude10010 2 years ago
that's a BAD simulator...the only sim i trust is Lock On modern air combat...because it doesn't use any planes that don't have performance data and envolope data released for...so there's no f 22 in any real simulator.
every missile can pull more g's than a human...you don't "shake" missiles...you shake the lock by beaming (turning your vector so it's perpendicular to the radar beam)
SwampAshHSS 2 years ago
i know, and that's true on avoiding missiles, just not these...these 2 missiles are not only locked on by the initial lock, but also the lock from AWACS and satellite, so the missiles literally turn around and will continue to follow its target until it hits or runs out of fuel...just as an fyi, i live with an air force pilot and have spoken with F-22 pilots...not trying to brag, just that i know this stuff because i've spoken to the people who absolutely know this by heart
randomdude10010 2 years ago
i was actually wondering about that randomdude10010, about external locks other than the jet that fired the missile. i know that F22's can shared locks as well...but keep in mind that the mig-25 could do that back in the 80's.....so i'm sure those russians have some aiwacs and sats they can use too. another thing, the missile can't just "turn around", cause it might run out of fuel, it also slows it down....like missiles have always been, the biggest factor is the position the plane fired from
SwampAshHSS 2 years ago
the position of the firing plane used to be the factor back when missiles flew straight or slightly sideways, but now we have missile programming that allows the missile to strike from above, since the plane has more surface area than straight on with it, and yes of course the russians have some sort of advanced radar, but the F-22 has gone through nearly 200 different radar systems simply because the first couple of hundred weren't overly advanced enough
randomdude10010 2 years ago
Dude, ace combat is sweet
vassilgl 2 years ago
i know rite! i let three col's and one gen see it and they were all impressed with it's attention to detail...i think only two of them weren't pilots!
randomdude10010 2 years ago
The public make the f-22 sound like such a powerful aircraft. As a matter of fact, it hasn't had confirmed military kills. To me, it's just a plane that is fast and stealthy nothing more nothing less. The plane in the same league in maneuverability with the Raptor is the Su-37.
LuyenDarkness 3 years ago
it has no air-to-air kills since we are not in battle with anyone with an air force, but it does have ground kills under its belt, not much talk about it other than on the military channel when they talked about it
randomdude10010 3 years ago
Man...man...man...you dont know nothing abut planes but you think you are so smart...SU37,47,30MK,35...dont fly like stupid..they fly with MIG31...why?? Because he has the best aircraft radar Zaslon...he give them fucken informations about sky in front of them...an just...YES ZASLON can track F22... xD
nedeljko031 2 years ago
i know you're trying to make a point...i just don't see it...or rather i don't care since i do know exactly what i'm talking about
randomdude10010 2 years ago
As you say mu friend :)
nedeljko031 2 years ago