Wow, Ryan Sorba looked like a giant douche...probably because he is a giant douche. "Bring it! Bring it!" haha, yeah. By the way, I doubt he is ever thinking "Oh, hey, I'm going to be procreating right now, that's why I'm putting my penis into this vagina." Sex is so much about pleasure, not just "scientific" reason. There's an emotional--which is psychological (it's a science)--reason for homosexuality.
I can visualize this guy in one of those shiny, nice, black SS Uniforms. This guy needs to be the Poster Child promoting why we need to legalise abortions or what could happen when sperm and eggs just don't like one another.
lol...this is your lovable, laughable, Republican Party youth. These are the same assholes running around saying there aren't any jobs. Here is a reality check. There are jobs, but your conservative parents brought you up to think you are entitled to start at 100 thousand dollars a year just because you went to some second rate college.
This guy represents what the Republicans are all about...STUPIDITY, racism and hatred.
@akrifasouth Rhetoric? Learn philosophy, natural law theory, and aristotelian logic you abject dolt. Amazing how people just brush off arguments as "rhetoric" without learning to separate logical argumentation and conclusions from rhetoric.
@Mustdang Dear sillyperson - there have been great strides in the study of philosophy since Aristotle and his disciples, or have you had your rather insubstantial head up your arse for the past two-and-a-half millennia? A logical argument must contain... well... LOGIC. Logic changes with scientific progress. Keep up now - I know its difficult, but please try. Oh, you must try! Do!
@akrifasouth LOL logic changes with scientific progress?? Wow. You are a dolt. End of story. By the way, our logic is aristotelian. He is, after all, the father of logic. I guess you're too ignorant to attend school and actually study it.
@akrifasouth Science is based on logic you dolt. Logic can exist without science, but science cannot exist without logic. If science is disregarded, logic is still there. Benjamin is plainly wrong. Throwing a quote out there that is logically a non-sequitur isn't helping your cause, moron. As a said before, go attend school and actually study philosophy before going up against someone who is in that field.
@Mustdang Got to agree with akrifasouth: logic is part of its time frame. Otherwise it is mere verbal acrobatic trickery in a synthetic bubble, which reaches delightful conclusions that are utterly impractical, but sound excellent within a particular framework that you control - be it a Aristotelian, neo-Platonic, or whatever. I agree: it is merely rhetoric that he uses (and badly). By the way - you are very aggressive, and you seem to delight in goading people you dislike. Not very logical.
@nicksum29 So you think logic is relative? Hmm, that's pretty strong when a majority of philosophers hold that logic exists in all possible worlds, ergo it exists necessarily.
@akrifasouth "As a said before, go attend school and actually study philosophy before going up against someone who is in that field." You are the first student of philosophy (giggle) that I know of who can barely string a coherent sentence together - let alone a LOGICAL one. Let go of the big fish now, my rank little amateur. Funny how people with barely a primary (let alone tertiary) education accuse others of not having one. Run along now, and seek help for your Malignant Narcissism.
See, this man is a friend and champion for REASON and RATIONALITY. And HUMANITY. These gay activists are nice people, probably, and there is no hate involved, here. But they don't realize that the beef we have them is entirely against their IRRATIONALITY. I am sure that is much to their chagrin, but if you, my gay activist friends, if you would like actually like to learn the arguments of your opponents and not just shout them down, I invite you to pay closer attention to people like Sorba.
No, Conservatism is by definition adhering to traditionally held values and mores & therefore limiting expansions of the realm of thought.... doesn't sound like freedom to me.
"Conservatism is freedom. Freedom is for everyone, sir."
If that's the case, why so many oppose gay marriage? Most rational people and medical professionals accept it as natural, but even going off "it's a choice"... why can't adults choose to marry the same sex?
AND...why did so many conservatives oppose interracial marriage?
@random654789 You calling me "retarded" shows your level of maturity. If you do a simple search on the issue, you find evidence. For example, "1,500 Animal Species Practice Homosexuality," news-medical(dot) net/news/2006/10/23/20718.aspx
@strawberryseason I read up on this, This only occurs in captivity. Best guess is testosterone levels are to high for chimpanzee's. It does not occur in the wild so it is not natural.
@random654789 None of the prominent articles on this issue says that homosexualty is limited to animals in captivity. It occurs in species in their natural environments.
Welcome LGBT I am a conservative, a republican, a Christian. I welcome all Gay people who have conservative views, and will proudly walk beside them , and welcome them.
Civil rights are grounded in natural rights. Natural rights are grounded in human nature. Human nature is a rational substance in relationship. The intelligible end of the reproductive act is reproduction.
There's more to gay marriage than your often repeated talking point of "sodomy". Your attempt to ridicule the love of certain people to mere "sodomy" or mere sex ... betrays your bigotry.
How would you feel if someone said that about how you or one of your parents feel about their spouse?
"Conservatives" are now booing someone for disapproving of homosexuality...
WOW.
I guess you should "bend over" and spread 'em then, "conservatives".
What exactly is it you are trying to "conserve" anyway?
Regardless, I do have to say I agree with Ron Paul's stance on this issue. The government should stay out of the marriage business. BOTH gay AND straight.
@1776Matthew Matthew, you claim to be a bisexual, then you claim to trash gays in one breath. You make no sense at all. You want to legislate YOUR morality on others because you don't approve of them-- even though APA and AMA studies show that gay and lesbians can be great parents and their kids can be well adjusted just as much as anyone elses. Marriage is a personal affair, and govt should have no part of it, and you should tell childless or old couples that they can't adopt either!
@1776Matthew So do you masturbate? If so you are wasting your reproductive ability. There goes your argument on gay people having kids. Who are you to tell people if they are good enough to have children? Sickening.
Do you expect me to follow you into the realm of public indecency by answering that?
"Who are you to tell people if they are good enough to have children?"
I don't have to tell them they are "not good enough". THEY PHYSICALLY FORFEIT THEIR ABILITY TO PROCREATE when they choose to dive into the hairy man-hole instead of doing what nature intended. (Same for lesbians, of course.) I don't have to take anything away from them. They forfeit voluntarily.
@1776Matthew So only people who are fertile should be able to be married and have children? So we should halt adoptions to those who can not procreate? LIke say straight couples who are infertile? You stated earlier you're a bisexual, but you sure are one confused person if you ask me. You should keep your nose out of other people's lives and stop trying to legislate what you think is right or not. Two people who are in love who want to have kids should be able to do so- you shut your yap
@hipstermi "You were asked to explain how "equipment" means more rights..."
1. I invite you to quote yourself from your previous post. Where did you ask such a question?
"'Equipment' means more rights..."
2. I invite you to quote my previous posts, and show where I made such an assertion. You are either having trouble with your reading comprehension, difficulty grasping the concepts being discussed, or your are making some intellectually dishonest attempt to "win the argument" with squid ink.
@nwuguy23 "Two people who are in love who want to have kids should be able to do so"
Two people who are in love and have functional and complementary sex-organs should be able to have kids. Two people who are in love and have functional but mutually self-negating/incompatible sex organs HAVE VOLUNTARILY FORFEITED THEIR ABILITY TO PROCREATE.
If they want a child they should give up sodomizing their racquetball buddies and go MATE with a nice female. (Vice-versa *or something* for dykes.)
@1776Matthew According to your 'logic' sexuality is only for reproduction, therefore all oral sex is wrong and so is masturbation. I have news for you, in society today, we think being in love (not the ability to make babies) is the reason people want to be united in marriage. Being gay has nothing to do with your ability to be a good and loving parent. You're a bigot, and there's no two ways about it.
"Two people who are in love and have functional but mutually self-negating/incompatible sex organs HAVE VOLUNTARILY FORFEITED THEIR ABILITY TO PROCREATE."
BE HONEST- is this about your religion?
You conservatives never pushed "marriage is procreation" before, or you would have made having kids a REQUIREMENT of marriage.
On top of that, but a couple who had say a vasectomy could still adopt. No conservative anger there.
@1776Matthew It's publicly indecent to answer if you masturbate or not? What century do you live in? If the only purpose of reproductive organs is to reproduce and the only purpose of sex acts is reproduction you certainly should NEVER masturbate and you should NEVER receive oral sex or give it to anyone - even in a hetero marriage. I have a news flash for you- marriage is about being in love with the person you want to share your life with, and having children is about being a good parent.
"I don't have to tell them they are "not good enough". THEY PHYSICALLY FORFEIT THEIR ABILITY TO PROCREATE when they choose to dive into the hairy man-hole instead of doing what nature intended"
So a str8 couple the chooses not to have kids...what's your take on that? As far as I know they can still adopt.
What about single people who want to adopt?
You seem to imply that orphans would be better off in an orphanage than loving gay parents. You lack compassion.
Our Republican party will never get off the ground as long as we continue to support dying issues, i.e., opposition to gay marriage. Don't you realize in 50 years, this won't even be a topic as gay marriage will obviously be legalized.
How can you be OK with looking like an idiot to future generations?
Most homos i meet are VERY conservative, they want a family, a job, a normal life. why they all vote dem is the social issues. the GOP wastes its time on gay marriage instead of spending and entitlements. It chastised gays, even though gays have formed a conservative group..." the Log cabin republicans " the GOP still dwells on this insignificant issue about sexuality. in real life WHO cares if someone is gay or not. Bigger issues need to be addressed. I welcome Gay Americans to the GOP
I believe that was "homocriticism", not "homophobia". I think that the numbers of people with an "irrational FEAR" of gays are probably in the single digits.
@1776Matthew I completely agree, sir. I'm openly Queer (bisexual to be exact), and I live in a community where I am surrounded by conservative Christians everywhere I go; they're some of the best friends I've ever had.
@loqutor Well, I for one don't have any problem with your private "boinking" choices. What I DO have a problem with is this militant gay agenda that is now openly going after the entire nation's children. (Really, the entire Western World's children.) I also wish that some gays would get over their sexuality already, and just try to live a more "normal" lifestyle in terms of their flamboyance and their tendency to define their entire identity by their sexual habits.
@1776Matthew Again, we find ourselves in complete agreement. What you describe is exactly what drove me out of gay activism. They treated me like a pariah because I wasn't gay enough for them (in more than one way).
@1776Matthew well- how about we let them get married then and stop denying them of their rights? If it's part of some weird "gay agenda" to want to be able to marry the person you love, then I guess it's weird for a man and a woman to get married? Love is love.
@nwuguy23 I agree with Ron Paul's stance on this issue. The government should stay out of the marriage business. BOTH gay AND straight.
Marriage and love are personal/religious/spiritual/family matters.
However, the state ABSOLUTELY SHOULD prevent them from adopting children. They forfeit their "right" to have children by WILLINGLY squandering their natural reproductive ability.
@1776Matthew Why are you parsing words? There are people who have a extreme dislike of gay people for nothing more than they are different. The answer is clear. If you don't like gays, don't be gay. Pretty simple. What business of it is anyone's?????
@seahorse05 You did just see that they booed him off the stage? And you you still accuse them of supporting him? Whats the matter the conservatives don't fit the propaganda you have been fed? I'm a conservative, and I'm proud of every single person that booed him.... Wanting liberty from a corporately controlled over sized federal government is a CONSERVATIVE value!
This guy is just like Obama--talks a lot, sounds eloquent and intelligent, but once you start listening deeper, you realize how much hallowed space is in him and behind what he spews.
Ryan must have a lot of skeletons in his closet. I won't be surprised to see him in Ted Haggard's train-wreck down the road. To have so much hate against one minority group that do nothing to him is just suspicious. He is building a career on anti-gay hate-fest when he could contribute something positive.
@kanebear Seems to me is a typical red blooded right winger and like most of his Repub brethren absolutley hates gays. The modern day R party makes a living out of gay bashing. So here comes a devotee of such bashing and people boo him? There were also a good deal of cheers going on. Gays who vote R, need to have their heads examined.
I guess that this guy believes that masturbation, handjobs, anal sex, oral sex, and everything else except for vaginal sex should be outlawed, because those are not for reproduction.
@SchindlerHaughton You seem surprised? Don't be. The R party, in time, will ban all sexual activity you named and will build the jail space to house the offenders. It's the Repub job creation program. Prison building for the morally unfit. Reps are the vermin of the world. If everyone of you bastards melted right in your place, right now, the country would be better off. Fuck you all.!!
@Loejyrrab : The grand old party love their anti-gay leaders who take a WIDE-STANCE!!! The republicans are just scum bags and bag boys for the rich. They have to appeal to the homophobic red necks because, except for the super wealthy, their the only dumb fucks that will vote for such morons. Ryan Sorba is a slime ball and I wish his closet door would open.
@Loejyrrab : The grand old party love their anti-gay leaders who take a WIDE-STANCE!!! The republicans are just scum bags and bag boys for the rich. They have to appeal to the homophobic red necks because, except for the super wealthy, their the only dumb fucks that will vote for such morons. Ryan Sorba is a slime ball and I wish his closet door would open.
Yep, he has freedom of opinion, so he has every right to say the idiotic things he says. We also have every right to boo him off the stage for being an idiot.
@streetmagicstyle Yes, Sorba is a complete jerk. As is every other humanoid in that CPAC meeting. And yes, we need Ron Paul, running as an independant. I'd vote for him in a heartbeat and I'm a lib. We need his kind of foreign policy, NON INTERVENTIONIST.
What a douche! How can you be in an organization titled "For Freedom" if you think government should decide who people are allowed to marry and how you can have sex?
So when this guy is getting down and dirty with his woman, then he better not stick it in her butt. That's not 'an act of reproduction.' Neither is someone sucking his dick or him carpet-munching on a girl. I conclude this guy must have boring sex!
I'm appauled with the audiences rude respons to the speakers opinion. I was under the impression that only liberals participated in pseudo-profound protesting during lectures. Regardless what your opinion is on homosexuality, his views were well reasoned and you did not give him a chance to express them. Instead, you people reduced yourselves to a bunch of frauds standing up not because you neccesarily believe in the cause, but because you wanted to present yourselves as modern civil activists.
His views weren't well reasoned: he deserved to be booed just for getting the concept of natural rights wrong.
Freedom of speech doesn't exclude mercilessly ridiculing people that you know are wrong. He cannot be the subject of legal action, because he has the constitutional right to say idiotic things. And every other person in the room had the constitutional right to tell him to eat shit and die.
barry goldwater is also known as mr. conservative. He founded the YAF ( I think, maybe WFB did). Anywho, YAF is a joke. Jack Hunter is right, YAF is worthless because they seem to not care about ndividual rights.
Conservative here. AGAIN! The whole anti-gay marriage idea in his mind comes down to the idea of reproduction. So what do we do with heterosexual couples who don't have children!? Hmm?
Because we all know that in these people's minds, stupid excuses for their hatred like "because gays can't reproduce" are arguments they learn after ALREADY adopting their hateful ideas (most often from their religion of choice).
There's more important things to debate about than gay marriage, people...
@Politicimo Now let me just add an addendum. I'm a huge advocate for free speech, pretty much no matter how hateful and bigoted (short of inciting people to violence - which is illegal).
It's amazing how these hateful organizations try to flank there stages with black faces to give the appearence that it is diverse. Amazing deception at its best.
@realityme Your attitude is so typically condescending of someone from the "Progressive" left. You blather on about how conservatives are racist and yet have the gall to suppose that people of other skin colours couldn't POSSIBLY ever be conservatives...all the while proclaiming yourselves the "enlightened," and not subject to racist opinion.
Please educate yourself and go to blogs for victory.com and search "Another black conservative another vile racist attack from the left"
@Politicimo You are a laughable idiot. Half of you right wingnuts are GAY (fact). Your listen to raving mad men like Beck, Billo the clown, Delusional Hannity, mr. drug dealer Pus Rush and speak of "enlightenment? You attack me and call me and others racist, a clear tactic of racist to confuse an issue. You call me a "progressive" which is meant as an attack, so in turn you must be, by definition, a REGRESSIVE. How can any who says they love freedom HATE and MOCK progress. What a joke. lol
@realityme So calling half of conservatives gay (all caps) isn't meant as an insult? Hmm. I personally think Beck is an idiot. And no I didn't call you racist. If you read my post, I called you condescending (which again comes out in your assumption that anyone conservative must stupid).
If "progress" consists of slandering millions of people in America for their thoughts (ones which disagree with yours), then yeah, I guess I'm against "progress".
"The intelligible act of the reproductive act is reproduction..."
Oh, so that's why senior citizens take viagra! They want to reproduce in their twilight years. Of course! And I thought they just wanted to have sex. Foolish me.
@Ematched I guess it would be true to say that a blind and deaf man who can not see or hear can not illustrate the intelligible act of the eyes and ears is to see and hear?
Of course, sight and to hear is just a "social construct."
@TheAccidentalFascist You could possibly have a point, had it any sense of equivalency to my comment. The words "sight" and "hear" are social constructs, the relative functions they represent are not. At least not in the same sense that having sex with a person is immediately cast in relation to social mores, or at least the social mores of a dwindling majority.
Two old people banging it out isn't a social construct, nor is their inability to reproduce.
@TheAccidentalFascist You could possibly have a point, had it any sense of equivalency to my comment. The words "sight" and "hear" are social constructs, the relative functions they represent are not. At least not in the same sense that having sex with a person is immediately cast in relation to social mores, or at least the social mores of a dwindling majority.
Two old people banging it out isn't a social construct, nor is their inability to reproduce.
It is hypocritical to be pro family and be a bigot who restricts the rights of a minority. What kind of message is is giving to the children of america. It sounds like he is saying that its alright to oppress those who behave different than the majority.
Ryan Sorba stood up for his beliefs. He was the first one to ring the bell to make others aware of CPAC being infiltrated by leftist disguised as a "conservative" group GoProud. And it finally paid off. This is a huge victory for true conservative values and the family
Hello, my name is Ryan Sobra, I represent California Young Americans FOR FREEDOM, and I would like to make sure your prick never goes into anything other than cunts, OR ELSE
I wonder if Republicans and "conservatives" realize how many people they're turning off by giving guys like this a platform. For a person like me who actually believes in fiscal conservatism, it's just not possible to associate myself with giant douchebags like this.
@DosuZakuKin Rethugs don't hate us (The Gays)? They're working tirelessly to take away our rights, and they pal around with people from NARTH and NOW and Defend the Family, Scott Lively's lovely little group that helped lay the groundwork for the Kill The Gays bill in Uganda. Sorba hates us and the Rethugs do too!
Civil rights =/= Natural rights... Just because one lives in a Civil society does not mean that he or she has the natural right to coerce others to believe in what the individual believes...
"The intelligible end of the reproductive act is reproduction." To be honest, I'm not really sure what he means by "intelligible end". Is he saying that he himself only engages in sex with the aim of producing children?
@SylvanaForrester I think it was trying to grunt it's way through to saying that the biological purpose of intercourse is procreation. That's of course completely ignoring that it's also biologically wired in us for sex to feel damn amazing, but whatever. Bigots will believe what they want and haters gotta hate.
It's so funny that liberals used this to show how CPAC and its members were all homophobic jackasses, when in reality, this guy got the shit booed out of him.
Geez. Insult the crowd, insult the host, insult a group that's part of the gig, insult individuals in the audience, insult LGBT people in general, insult the young women of Smith College in a kind of chauvinistic way, and insult heterosexuals by implying that they are merely breeders - no other reason to love, you dig? What a jerk.
So ya think he'll be invited back in 2011? Humm. He got booed off the stage and I was there to boo him. Proudly! No need to use profanity here folks!
I guess he opposes marriages where one or both people are sterile. Or marriages where the people choose not to reproduce. Otherwise, he would be a big hypocrite.
But his premise is just stupid. Civil rights represent society's agreement on what freedoms people get from the government. When did "nature" come into play?
@PoliticsStudent while I agree with you on gay marriage and that this man is an idiot to the nTH dgree. You might need to read some Thomas Paine or...Thomas jefferson...or the constitution. We are born with certain unalienable rights or "natural laws" according to paine. That the government cannot grant but can take away. The government cant grant these rights without having taken them at birth first. This idea that all our rights and good things come from the government is highly dangerous.
Wow, Ryan Sorba looked like a giant douche...probably because he is a giant douche. "Bring it! Bring it!" haha, yeah. By the way, I doubt he is ever thinking "Oh, hey, I'm going to be procreating right now, that's why I'm putting my penis into this vagina." Sex is so much about pleasure, not just "scientific" reason. There's an emotional--which is psychological (it's a science)--reason for homosexuality.
RyanM4N 5 days ago
LMAO! Young Americans for Freedom is a joke. Young Americans for Liberty (headed by Jeff Frazee) is where it's at.
MrUnicorn1995 1 week ago
I can visualize this guy in one of those shiny, nice, black SS Uniforms. This guy needs to be the Poster Child promoting why we need to legalise abortions or what could happen when sperm and eggs just don't like one another.
IngloriusBastard11 1 week ago
Watching CPAC is like watching the god damn Gong Show.
IngloriusBastard11 1 week ago
lol...this is your lovable, laughable, Republican Party youth. These are the same assholes running around saying there aren't any jobs. Here is a reality check. There are jobs, but your conservative parents brought you up to think you are entitled to start at 100 thousand dollars a year just because you went to some second rate college.
This guy represents what the Republicans are all about...STUPIDITY, racism and hatred.
IngloriusBastard11 1 week ago 2
"he loves it!" he loves being bukkaked and pounded in his anus
ferrozm 2 months ago
But he's right - the lesbians did do a good job of shutting him up.
akrifasouth 3 months ago
Yes another closeted republican hiding behind self-consciously verbal anti-gay rhetoric.
akrifasouth 3 months ago
@akrifasouth Rhetoric? Learn philosophy, natural law theory, and aristotelian logic you abject dolt. Amazing how people just brush off arguments as "rhetoric" without learning to separate logical argumentation and conclusions from rhetoric.
Mustdang 3 months ago
@Mustdang Dear sillyperson - there have been great strides in the study of philosophy since Aristotle and his disciples, or have you had your rather insubstantial head up your arse for the past two-and-a-half millennia? A logical argument must contain... well... LOGIC. Logic changes with scientific progress. Keep up now - I know its difficult, but please try. Oh, you must try! Do!
akrifasouth 3 months ago
@akrifasouth LOL logic changes with scientific progress?? Wow. You are a dolt. End of story. By the way, our logic is aristotelian. He is, after all, the father of logic. I guess you're too ignorant to attend school and actually study it.
Mustdang 3 months ago
@Mustdang "When science is disregarded, logic is neither a science nor an art, but a dodge."
Benjamin Jowett Read more books than Philosophy for Dummies, dummy.
akrifasouth 3 months ago
@akrifasouth Science is based on logic you dolt. Logic can exist without science, but science cannot exist without logic. If science is disregarded, logic is still there. Benjamin is plainly wrong. Throwing a quote out there that is logically a non-sequitur isn't helping your cause, moron. As a said before, go attend school and actually study philosophy before going up against someone who is in that field.
Mustdang 3 months ago
@Mustdang Got to agree with akrifasouth: logic is part of its time frame. Otherwise it is mere verbal acrobatic trickery in a synthetic bubble, which reaches delightful conclusions that are utterly impractical, but sound excellent within a particular framework that you control - be it a Aristotelian, neo-Platonic, or whatever. I agree: it is merely rhetoric that he uses (and badly). By the way - you are very aggressive, and you seem to delight in goading people you dislike. Not very logical.
nicksum29 3 months ago
@nicksum29 So you think logic is relative? Hmm, that's pretty strong when a majority of philosophers hold that logic exists in all possible worlds, ergo it exists necessarily.
Mustdang 3 months ago
@akrifasouth "As a said before, go attend school and actually study philosophy before going up against someone who is in that field." You are the first student of philosophy (giggle) that I know of who can barely string a coherent sentence together - let alone a LOGICAL one. Let go of the big fish now, my rank little amateur. Funny how people with barely a primary (let alone tertiary) education accuse others of not having one. Run along now, and seek help for your Malignant Narcissism.
akrifasouth 3 months ago
@akrifasouth Show me which sentence is not logical or coherent. Please, enlighten me.
Mustdang 3 months ago
See, this man is a friend and champion for REASON and RATIONALITY. And HUMANITY. These gay activists are nice people, probably, and there is no hate involved, here. But they don't realize that the beef we have them is entirely against their IRRATIONALITY. I am sure that is much to their chagrin, but if you, my gay activist friends, if you would like actually like to learn the arguments of your opponents and not just shout them down, I invite you to pay closer attention to people like Sorba.
BalladoftheWindfish 3 months ago
What a massive tool.
zeroeffects88 4 months ago
Conservatism is freedom. Freedom is for everyone, sir.
MicrosoftWindowsGuy 5 months ago
@MicrosoftWindowsGuy
No, Conservatism is by definition adhering to traditionally held values and mores & therefore limiting expansions of the realm of thought.... doesn't sound like freedom to me.
LetTheseThingsBe 5 months ago
@MicrosoftWindowsGuy ....being gay is hazardous to your health
TheJasonDR 4 months ago
@TheJasonDR
HAHAHA! Being ALIVE is hazardous to your health!
MicrosoftWindowsGuy 4 months ago
@MicrosoftWindowsGuy yeah...but you can die having sex with a dude
TheJasonDR 4 months ago
@TheJasonDR
Oh, please! Stop! You're too much! haha
MicrosoftWindowsGuy 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MicrosoftWindowsGuy
"Conservatism is freedom. Freedom is for everyone, sir."
If that's the case, why so many oppose gay marriage? Most rational people and medical professionals accept it as natural, but even going off "it's a choice"... why can't adults choose to marry the same sex?
AND...why did so many conservatives oppose interracial marriage?
hipstermi 4 months ago
The Smith College lesbians do make some sweet placards.
Vegemighty 5 months ago
Closet case.
Ladykofnyc2 5 months ago
I guess because this is happening at a conservative meeting it shows we are progressing
MamaMario13 6 months ago
I guess he believes that it is unnatural then, for post menopausal women to have sexual intercourse, because there is no reproduction possible.
strawberryseason 6 months ago
@strawberryseason That is really irrelevant, Being gay is un-natural
random654789 6 months ago
@random654789 How can something be unnatural if it exists in nature? Homosexuality exists in the non-human animal kingdom as well.
strawberryseason 6 months ago
@strawberryseason show me and example of this claim, you can't you're just retarded.
random654789 6 months ago
@random654789 You calling me "retarded" shows your level of maturity. If you do a simple search on the issue, you find evidence. For example, "1,500 Animal Species Practice Homosexuality," news-medical(dot) net/news/2006/10/23/20718.aspx
strawberryseason 6 months ago
@strawberryseason I read up on this, This only occurs in captivity. Best guess is testosterone levels are to high for chimpanzee's. It does not occur in the wild so it is not natural.
random654789 6 months ago
@random654789 None of the prominent articles on this issue says that homosexualty is limited to animals in captivity. It occurs in species in their natural environments.
strawberryseason 6 months ago
Welcome LGBT I am a conservative, a republican, a Christian. I welcome all Gay people who have conservative views, and will proudly walk beside them , and welcome them.
medic9five 6 months ago
Civil rights are grounded in natural rights. Natural rights are grounded in human nature. Human nature is a rational substance in relationship. The intelligible end of the reproductive act is reproduction.
Sodomy is not a civil right.
vidbid1 6 months ago
@vidbid1
"Sodomy is not a civil right."
There's more to gay marriage than your often repeated talking point of "sodomy". Your attempt to ridicule the love of certain people to mere "sodomy" or mere sex ... betrays your bigotry.
How would you feel if someone said that about how you or one of your parents feel about their spouse?
hipstermi 4 months ago
GODDDD it is unbelievable. he is COMPLETELY GAY. he must really hate himself. give him a couple of years before he has some gay sex scandal. sooo sad
elbabalao 6 months ago
yet another stubbornly backward doctrinaire...he should have spent less time reading Saint Augustine and more time masturbating in college.
dsamogray 8 months ago
"Conservatives" are now booing someone for disapproving of homosexuality...
WOW.
I guess you should "bend over" and spread 'em then, "conservatives".
What exactly is it you are trying to "conserve" anyway?
Regardless, I do have to say I agree with Ron Paul's stance on this issue. The government should stay out of the marriage business. BOTH gay AND straight.
1776Matthew 9 months ago
@1776Matthew Matthew, you claim to be a bisexual, then you claim to trash gays in one breath. You make no sense at all. You want to legislate YOUR morality on others because you don't approve of them-- even though APA and AMA studies show that gay and lesbians can be great parents and their kids can be well adjusted just as much as anyone elses. Marriage is a personal affair, and govt should have no part of it, and you should tell childless or old couples that they can't adopt either!
nwuguy23 7 months ago
@nwuguy23 "Matthew, you claim to be a bisexual"
And you claim to be a lunatic?
Please, oh please, quote me. Where did I claim to be bisexual? Post my words here for all to see.
I'll be waiting.
1776Matthew 7 months ago
@1776Matthew So do you masturbate? If so you are wasting your reproductive ability. There goes your argument on gay people having kids. Who are you to tell people if they are good enough to have children? Sickening.
nwuguy23 7 months ago
@nwuguy23 "So do you masturbate?"
Do you expect me to follow you into the realm of public indecency by answering that?
"Who are you to tell people if they are good enough to have children?"
I don't have to tell them they are "not good enough". THEY PHYSICALLY FORFEIT THEIR ABILITY TO PROCREATE when they choose to dive into the hairy man-hole instead of doing what nature intended. (Same for lesbians, of course.) I don't have to take anything away from them. They forfeit voluntarily.
1776Matthew 7 months ago
@1776Matthew So only people who are fertile should be able to be married and have children? So we should halt adoptions to those who can not procreate? LIke say straight couples who are infertile? You stated earlier you're a bisexual, but you sure are one confused person if you ask me. You should keep your nose out of other people's lives and stop trying to legislate what you think is right or not. Two people who are in love who want to have kids should be able to do so- you shut your yap
nwuguy23 7 months ago
@nwuguy23 "So only people who are fertile should be able to be married and have children?"
Quit with your lame straw-men attempts. Those are not my words.
People who ARE FERTILE, but CHOOSE WILLINGLY not to take advantage of it SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO ADOPT.
"You stated earlier you're a bisexual"
Once again, QUOTE ME, ASSHOLE. Put up or shut up. You're only making yourself look like a clown with your limp-wristed smear tactics.
1776Matthew 7 months ago
@1776Matthew
"People who ARE FERTILE, but CHOOSE WILLINGLY not to take advantage of it SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO ADOPT."
Thats a statement...but you didnt offer any logical reason to back it up. No law cited, no reasonign that made any sense.
BE HONEST- is this REALLY about your religion?
hipstermi 4 months ago
@hipstermi The logical reasons are self-evident. I can't do your thinking for you if your little brain is broken.
Bruce wants children.
Bruce has a perfectly functional set of male equipment.
Bruce could buy some flowers for Betty, marry her, boink her, & put a bun in her oven.
But instead, Bruce CHOOSES OF HIS OWN FREE WILL to forsake Betty, & f*** Raoul in his a**.
But selfish, unnatural Bruce STILL wants children.
We should give him someone else's, because he refuses to make his own?
1776Matthew 4 months ago
@1776Matthew
That's not a logical argument. You were asked to explain how "equipment" means more rights...and you failed.
You did not address that having kids is not a legal requirement for marriage nor the ability to have kids a requirement for adoption.
You did not answer if this REALLY is about your religion.
I would appreciate direct and complete answers to all of these.
hipstermi 4 months ago
@hipstermi "You were asked to explain how "equipment" means more rights..."
1. I invite you to quote yourself from your previous post. Where did you ask such a question?
"'Equipment' means more rights..."
2. I invite you to quote my previous posts, and show where I made such an assertion. You are either having trouble with your reading comprehension, difficulty grasping the concepts being discussed, or your are making some intellectually dishonest attempt to "win the argument" with squid ink.
1776Matthew 4 months ago
@1776Matthew
You can play "pretend to not get it" all you want, but your posts were clear about reproduction.
It fails since reproduction is not a requirement for marriage...or adoption.
I have asked several times for you to be honest- is your issues about homosexuality REALLY about your religion.
hipstermi 4 months ago
@nwuguy23 "Two people who are in love who want to have kids should be able to do so"
Two people who are in love and have functional and complementary sex-organs should be able to have kids. Two people who are in love and have functional but mutually self-negating/incompatible sex organs HAVE VOLUNTARILY FORFEITED THEIR ABILITY TO PROCREATE.
If they want a child they should give up sodomizing their racquetball buddies and go MATE with a nice female. (Vice-versa *or something* for dykes.)
1776Matthew 7 months ago
@1776Matthew According to your 'logic' sexuality is only for reproduction, therefore all oral sex is wrong and so is masturbation. I have news for you, in society today, we think being in love (not the ability to make babies) is the reason people want to be united in marriage. Being gay has nothing to do with your ability to be a good and loving parent. You're a bigot, and there's no two ways about it.
nwuguy23 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nwuguy23 "According to your 'logic' sexuality is only for reproduction, therefore all oral sex is wrong and so is masturbation."
First of all it is not "my logic", it is just LOGIC. Second, you obviously don't grasp it, because that is not what I said.
"You're a bigot, and there's no two ways about it."
Call me all the names you want. I get a real laugh out of it. I'm not the one with deviant, disgusting, and self-negating behavior.
1776Matthew 7 months ago
@1776Matthew
"Two people who are in love and have functional but mutually self-negating/incompatible sex organs HAVE VOLUNTARILY FORFEITED THEIR ABILITY TO PROCREATE."
BE HONEST- is this about your religion?
You conservatives never pushed "marriage is procreation" before, or you would have made having kids a REQUIREMENT of marriage.
On top of that, but a couple who had say a vasectomy could still adopt. No conservative anger there.
hipstermi 4 months ago
@1776Matthew It's publicly indecent to answer if you masturbate or not? What century do you live in? If the only purpose of reproductive organs is to reproduce and the only purpose of sex acts is reproduction you certainly should NEVER masturbate and you should NEVER receive oral sex or give it to anyone - even in a hetero marriage. I have a news flash for you- marriage is about being in love with the person you want to share your life with, and having children is about being a good parent.
nwuguy23 7 months ago
@nwuguy23 "What century do you live in?"
The one in which we've had enough of this degenerate bullshit, and we're finished pretending it's all OK.
1776Matthew 7 months ago
@1776Matthew
"I don't have to tell them they are "not good enough". THEY PHYSICALLY FORFEIT THEIR ABILITY TO PROCREATE when they choose to dive into the hairy man-hole instead of doing what nature intended"
So a str8 couple the chooses not to have kids...what's your take on that? As far as I know they can still adopt.
What about single people who want to adopt?
You seem to imply that orphans would be better off in an orphanage than loving gay parents. You lack compassion.
hipstermi 4 months ago
here we have a classic rapist.
QueerSwede1 9 months ago
And yes, I also welcome Gay Americans to the GOP
cowlark2000 9 months ago
Our Republican party will never get off the ground as long as we continue to support dying issues, i.e., opposition to gay marriage. Don't you realize in 50 years, this won't even be a topic as gay marriage will obviously be legalized.
How can you be OK with looking like an idiot to future generations?
cowlark2000 9 months ago
Most homos i meet are VERY conservative, they want a family, a job, a normal life. why they all vote dem is the social issues. the GOP wastes its time on gay marriage instead of spending and entitlements. It chastised gays, even though gays have formed a conservative group..." the Log cabin republicans " the GOP still dwells on this insignificant issue about sexuality. in real life WHO cares if someone is gay or not. Bigger issues need to be addressed. I welcome Gay Americans to the GOP
medic9five 10 months ago
Doesn't he have a lisp ?
gauthdanrich 10 months ago
Thi sis so aweosme, this guido is so clueless. Homophobia is yesteryear buddy, No one cares anymore.
nwuguy23 10 months ago
@nwuguy23 "Homophobia is yesteryear buddy"
I believe that was "homocriticism", not "homophobia". I think that the numbers of people with an "irrational FEAR" of gays are probably in the single digits.
1776Matthew 9 months ago
@1776Matthew I completely agree, sir. I'm openly Queer (bisexual to be exact), and I live in a community where I am surrounded by conservative Christians everywhere I go; they're some of the best friends I've ever had.
loqutor 8 months ago
@loqutor Well, I for one don't have any problem with your private "boinking" choices. What I DO have a problem with is this militant gay agenda that is now openly going after the entire nation's children. (Really, the entire Western World's children.) I also wish that some gays would get over their sexuality already, and just try to live a more "normal" lifestyle in terms of their flamboyance and their tendency to define their entire identity by their sexual habits.
1776Matthew 8 months ago
@1776Matthew Again, we find ourselves in complete agreement. What you describe is exactly what drove me out of gay activism. They treated me like a pariah because I wasn't gay enough for them (in more than one way).
loqutor 8 months ago
@1776Matthew well- how about we let them get married then and stop denying them of their rights? If it's part of some weird "gay agenda" to want to be able to marry the person you love, then I guess it's weird for a man and a woman to get married? Love is love.
nwuguy23 7 months ago
@nwuguy23 I agree with Ron Paul's stance on this issue. The government should stay out of the marriage business. BOTH gay AND straight.
Marriage and love are personal/religious/spiritual/family matters.
However, the state ABSOLUTELY SHOULD prevent them from adopting children. They forfeit their "right" to have children by WILLINGLY squandering their natural reproductive ability.
1776Matthew 7 months ago
@1776Matthew homocriticismphobia is a counter word to this whole "homophobia" word nonsense.
kissemurra12 7 months ago
@kissemurra12 "Homocriticism", yes.
1776Matthew 7 months ago
@1776Matthew Why are you parsing words? There are people who have a extreme dislike of gay people for nothing more than they are different. The answer is clear. If you don't like gays, don't be gay. Pretty simple. What business of it is anyone's?????
nwuguy23 7 months ago
Another repressed homoloathing GOP homosexual. The GOP is loaded with these pathetic dangerous goofs.
seahorse05 10 months ago 6
@seahorse05 You did just see that they booed him off the stage? And you you still accuse them of supporting him? Whats the matter the conservatives don't fit the propaganda you have been fed? I'm a conservative, and I'm proud of every single person that booed him.... Wanting liberty from a corporately controlled over sized federal government is a CONSERVATIVE value!
AMilitantAgnostic 2 months ago
See what Jon Stewart did with Sorba the geek by going to the Daily Show and typing in Ryan Sorba. Funny stuff!
writerJerome 10 months ago
@5random1 Agreed.
ilovecappuccino1 10 months ago
This guy talks out of his ass.FUCK OFF. He's prob gay anyways.
ilovecappuccino1 10 months ago
i am confused..is ryan gay or not??? cause there are gay dudes who are semi/quasi anti gay..his eyebrows say he is totally gay..
rhymeandreasoning 10 months ago
i want to kick this dudes ass badly....one good kick
rhymeandreasoning 10 months ago
This guy is just like Obama--talks a lot, sounds eloquent and intelligent, but once you start listening deeper, you realize how much hallowed space is in him and behind what he spews.
Ryan must have a lot of skeletons in his closet. I won't be surprised to see him in Ted Haggard's train-wreck down the road. To have so much hate against one minority group that do nothing to him is just suspicious. He is building a career on anti-gay hate-fest when he could contribute something positive.
etamlous 10 months ago
hahah i love how people dont know whether to like this or dislike it. Dislike it cause he's even talking, like it how he gets booed.
All in all,
i hate this bastard.
"make an enemy out of me?"
Fuck you, nobody cares.
roboticsage1 10 months ago 4
This incoherent fuckwad looks pretty gay to me.
sevenwrite 10 months ago
Comment removed
jeffhiseley 10 months ago
under his logic, rape and incest in the name of "reproduction" are okay, but urinating isn't. hmmm
dsalazar19 10 months ago
Conservatives are dicks
dudemanguy60 10 months ago
More like Freedom to hate.
lefsepowered 10 months ago
He says "bring it" like we're allowed to go up on stage and kick his ass.
carli2222 11 months ago 2
Holy crap CPAC comes across as the rational party in that exchange.
Crazydog7 11 months ago
Comment removed
David12King 11 months ago
MITCHELL ROCK = Ryan Sorba's gay pornstar twin brother!
WarpedDC84 11 months ago
Sorba is an arrogant douche bag.
kanebear 11 months ago
@kanebear Seems to me is a typical red blooded right winger and like most of his Repub brethren absolutley hates gays. The modern day R party makes a living out of gay bashing. So here comes a devotee of such bashing and people boo him? There were also a good deal of cheers going on. Gays who vote R, need to have their heads examined.
Loejyrrab 11 months ago
I guess that this guy believes that masturbation, handjobs, anal sex, oral sex, and everything else except for vaginal sex should be outlawed, because those are not for reproduction.
SchindlerHaughton 11 months ago
@SchindlerHaughton You seem surprised? Don't be. The R party, in time, will ban all sexual activity you named and will build the jail space to house the offenders. It's the Repub job creation program. Prison building for the morally unfit. Reps are the vermin of the world. If everyone of you bastards melted right in your place, right now, the country would be better off. Fuck you all.!!
Loejyrrab 11 months ago
@Loejyrrab : The grand old party love their anti-gay leaders who take a WIDE-STANCE!!! The republicans are just scum bags and bag boys for the rich. They have to appeal to the homophobic red necks because, except for the super wealthy, their the only dumb fucks that will vote for such morons. Ryan Sorba is a slime ball and I wish his closet door would open.
gaytenor 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Loejyrrab : The grand old party love their anti-gay leaders who take a WIDE-STANCE!!! The republicans are just scum bags and bag boys for the rich. They have to appeal to the homophobic red necks because, except for the super wealthy, their the only dumb fucks that will vote for such morons. Ryan Sorba is a slime ball and I wish his closet door would open.
gaytenor 10 months ago
Yep, he has freedom of opinion, so he has every right to say the idiotic things he says. We also have every right to boo him off the stage for being an idiot.
SchindlerHaughton 11 months ago
I think 3 ppl clapped for him hahahha
how embarrassing!
takheads 11 months ago
@takheads How embarrassing? It's embarrassing just being at that meeting of Rep.scum.
Loejyrrab 11 months ago
I think 3 ppl clapped for him hahahha
takheads 11 months ago
This dude has sex with farm animals yet discriminates against gay people.
Walkerisawanker 11 months ago
Ryan Sorba is a complete jerk. We need Ron Paul.
streetmagicstyle 1 year ago
@streetmagicstyle Yes, Sorba is a complete jerk. As is every other humanoid in that CPAC meeting. And yes, we need Ron Paul, running as an independant. I'd vote for him in a heartbeat and I'm a lib. We need his kind of foreign policy, NON INTERVENTIONIST.
Loejyrrab 11 months ago
What a douche! How can you be in an organization titled "For Freedom" if you think government should decide who people are allowed to marry and how you can have sex?
Knightmessenger 1 year ago
bahahahahahahahahaha! He thinks he's pretty BA. but he's not. "bring it, bring it..." hahahaha.
Chaaazz2008 1 year ago
So when this guy is getting down and dirty with his woman, then he better not stick it in her butt. That's not 'an act of reproduction.' Neither is someone sucking his dick or him carpet-munching on a girl. I conclude this guy must have boring sex!
zaqbeatshaq 1 year ago
I'm appauled with the audiences rude respons to the speakers opinion. I was under the impression that only liberals participated in pseudo-profound protesting during lectures. Regardless what your opinion is on homosexuality, his views were well reasoned and you did not give him a chance to express them. Instead, you people reduced yourselves to a bunch of frauds standing up not because you neccesarily believe in the cause, but because you wanted to present yourselves as modern civil activists.
mullensk8ter15 1 year ago
@mullensk8ter15
His views weren't well reasoned: he deserved to be booed just for getting the concept of natural rights wrong.
Freedom of speech doesn't exclude mercilessly ridiculing people that you know are wrong. He cannot be the subject of legal action, because he has the constitutional right to say idiotic things. And every other person in the room had the constitutional right to tell him to eat shit and die.
gordonfierce 11 months ago
barry goldwater is also known as mr. conservative. He founded the YAF ( I think, maybe WFB did). Anywho, YAF is a joke. Jack Hunter is right, YAF is worthless because they seem to not care about ndividual rights.
sharinganclan213 1 year ago
Conservative here. AGAIN! The whole anti-gay marriage idea in his mind comes down to the idea of reproduction. So what do we do with heterosexual couples who don't have children!? Hmm?
Because we all know that in these people's minds, stupid excuses for their hatred like "because gays can't reproduce" are arguments they learn after ALREADY adopting their hateful ideas (most often from their religion of choice).
There's more important things to debate about than gay marriage, people...
Politicimo 1 year ago
@Politicimo Now let me just add an addendum. I'm a huge advocate for free speech, pretty much no matter how hateful and bigoted (short of inciting people to violence - which is illegal).
Politicimo 1 year ago
What a piece of trash.
kuwinsitall 1 year ago
LOL! THIS WAS HILARIOUS!
IndividualAutonomy 1 year ago
It's amazing how these hateful organizations try to flank there stages with black faces to give the appearence that it is diverse. Amazing deception at its best.
realityme 1 year ago
@realityme Your attitude is so typically condescending of someone from the "Progressive" left. You blather on about how conservatives are racist and yet have the gall to suppose that people of other skin colours couldn't POSSIBLY ever be conservatives...all the while proclaiming yourselves the "enlightened," and not subject to racist opinion.
Please educate yourself and go to blogs for victory.com and search "Another black conservative another vile racist attack from the left"
Politicimo 1 year ago
@Politicimo You are a laughable idiot. Half of you right wingnuts are GAY (fact). Your listen to raving mad men like Beck, Billo the clown, Delusional Hannity, mr. drug dealer Pus Rush and speak of "enlightenment? You attack me and call me and others racist, a clear tactic of racist to confuse an issue. You call me a "progressive" which is meant as an attack, so in turn you must be, by definition, a REGRESSIVE. How can any who says they love freedom HATE and MOCK progress. What a joke. lol
realityme 1 year ago
@realityme So calling half of conservatives gay (all caps) isn't meant as an insult? Hmm. I personally think Beck is an idiot. And no I didn't call you racist. If you read my post, I called you condescending (which again comes out in your assumption that anyone conservative must stupid).
If "progress" consists of slandering millions of people in America for their thoughts (ones which disagree with yours), then yeah, I guess I'm against "progress".
Politicimo 1 year ago
"The intelligible act of the reproductive act is reproduction..."
Oh, so that's why senior citizens take viagra! They want to reproduce in their twilight years. Of course! And I thought they just wanted to have sex. Foolish me.
Ematched 1 year ago
@Ematched I guess it would be true to say that a blind and deaf man who can not see or hear can not illustrate the intelligible act of the eyes and ears is to see and hear?
Of course, sight and to hear is just a "social construct."
TheAccidentalFascist 1 year ago
@TheAccidentalFascist You could possibly have a point, had it any sense of equivalency to my comment. The words "sight" and "hear" are social constructs, the relative functions they represent are not. At least not in the same sense that having sex with a person is immediately cast in relation to social mores, or at least the social mores of a dwindling majority.
Two old people banging it out isn't a social construct, nor is their inability to reproduce.
Linguistic games go in circles.
Ematched 1 year ago
@TheAccidentalFascist You could possibly have a point, had it any sense of equivalency to my comment. The words "sight" and "hear" are social constructs, the relative functions they represent are not. At least not in the same sense that having sex with a person is immediately cast in relation to social mores, or at least the social mores of a dwindling majority.
Two old people banging it out isn't a social construct, nor is their inability to reproduce.
Linguistic games ambulate.
Ematched 1 year ago
I bet he only has sex for reproduction. Yeah.
What a douche.
rippemies 1 year ago
jerry springer meets CPAC??
medic9five 1 year ago
This is what happens when you get a bunch of assholes together in one room. Good stuff.
Atombombmother 1 year ago 2
@Atombombmother was this the DNC ????
saclover 1 year ago
Seems like Larry Craig and Ted Haggard had an illegitimate son..
TLydon011 1 year ago 2
It is hypocritical to be pro family and be a bigot who restricts the rights of a minority. What kind of message is is giving to the children of america. It sounds like he is saying that its alright to oppress those who behave different than the majority.
dutchbert420 1 year ago
Not sure why he's getting booed, maybe it was his delivery, but the substance of his message was right on.
1776iscoming 1 year ago
Ryan Sorba stood up for his beliefs. He was the first one to ring the bell to make others aware of CPAC being infiltrated by leftist disguised as a "conservative" group GoProud. And it finally paid off. This is a huge victory for true conservative values and the family
funk7000 1 year ago
Get this guy into WWE. That was a hell of a heel promo
TNANOBUYS 1 year ago 15
Hello, my name is Ryan Sobra, I represent California Young Americans FOR FREEDOM, and I would like to make sure your prick never goes into anything other than cunts, OR ELSE
abxxxh 1 year ago
The homosexual movement is anti family period. God is not mocked.
leatherneck19741976 1 year ago
what a prick.
ElCID40000 1 year ago
I wonder if Republicans and "conservatives" realize how many people they're turning off by giving guys like this a platform. For a person like me who actually believes in fiscal conservatism, it's just not possible to associate myself with giant douchebags like this.
badtown88 1 year ago
I missed CPAC last year. I wish I had been here to boo this guy haha
mercurychick88 1 year ago
His make-up and tweezed eyebrows look fabulous. Let me guess - total bottom?
DClibertarian 1 year ago 35
@DClibertarian i agree with u. this guy is a total closet case.
dotd53 1 year ago
"Bring it. Bring it. Guess what? Guess what? Bring me the dildo that you stole from me. Bring it. Bring it. I need it." - Ryan Sorba
He is right to dislike GoProud, I'll give him that. What are my fellow queer brothers and sisters doing hanging out with the Rethugs who HATE THEM?
suvariboy 1 year ago 2
@suvariboy They don't hate you stupid, only he does. Maybe you didnt hear the booing?
DosuZakuKin 1 year ago
@DosuZakuKin Rethugs don't hate us (The Gays)? They're working tirelessly to take away our rights, and they pal around with people from NARTH and NOW and Defend the Family, Scott Lively's lovely little group that helped lay the groundwork for the Kill The Gays bill in Uganda. Sorba hates us and the Rethugs do too!
suvariboy 1 year ago
Civil rights =/= Natural rights... Just because one lives in a Civil society does not mean that he or she has the natural right to coerce others to believe in what the individual believes...
This guy is a hypocrite.
goodatbasebal 1 year ago 3
Ryan Sorba: he's the far-right equivalent of Kathy Griffin: they both invite and celebrate the boos they get.
thebrokenrattle 1 year ago
Comment removed
thebrokenrattle 1 year ago
Toilet Trader!
tigeremod 1 year ago
...as if anybody could give a crap if Ryan Sorba were their "enemy". FLUSH
woodsprout 1 year ago
Ryan Sorba, What a full-of-himself jerk.
woodsprout 1 year ago
OKAY.....who is this big nelly queen condemning?
clubindiana4 1 year ago
"The intelligible end of the reproductive act is reproduction." To be honest, I'm not really sure what he means by "intelligible end". Is he saying that he himself only engages in sex with the aim of producing children?
SylvanaForrester 1 year ago
@SylvanaForrester I think it was trying to grunt it's way through to saying that the biological purpose of intercourse is procreation. That's of course completely ignoring that it's also biologically wired in us for sex to feel damn amazing, but whatever. Bigots will believe what they want and haters gotta hate.
Floridanon407 1 year ago
what a big nobody
Voy2378 1 year ago
Anybody with eyebrows that well sculpted has to be gay. Someone should tell him that his hero Alan Blum is gay too.
TheTroll342 1 year ago
good for him.
josh1422 1 year ago
It's so funny that liberals used this to show how CPAC and its members were all homophobic jackasses, when in reality, this guy got the shit booed out of him.
AshillaBeige 1 year ago
Geez. Insult the crowd, insult the host, insult a group that's part of the gig, insult individuals in the audience, insult LGBT people in general, insult the young women of Smith College in a kind of chauvinistic way, and insult heterosexuals by implying that they are merely breeders - no other reason to love, you dig? What a jerk.
CattttMD 1 year ago
lol
mizzoulibertarian 1 year ago
Gay head tilt at 1:04
fishnchunks 1 year ago
@fishnchunks LOL and some very well shaped eyebrows...
1985Aquiles 1 year ago
So ya think he'll be invited back in 2011? Humm. He got booed off the stage and I was there to boo him. Proudly! No need to use profanity here folks!
katyscreations 1 year ago 3
Comment removed
katyscreations 1 year ago
'Civil rights are based on natural rights'?
Wtf??? This guy is a moron. What the fuck is 'natural rights'? HAHA.
Dumb homophobe.
Mattyb88ful 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Mattyb88ful you don't know what natural rights are? You're a fucking idiot
yakwit 1 year ago
Absolute idiot
johnjhuff 1 year ago
I guess he opposes marriages where one or both people are sterile. Or marriages where the people choose not to reproduce. Otherwise, he would be a big hypocrite.
But his premise is just stupid. Civil rights represent society's agreement on what freedoms people get from the government. When did "nature" come into play?
PoliticsStudent 1 year ago
@PoliticsStudent while I agree with you on gay marriage and that this man is an idiot to the nTH dgree. You might need to read some Thomas Paine or...Thomas jefferson...or the constitution. We are born with certain unalienable rights or "natural laws" according to paine. That the government cannot grant but can take away. The government cant grant these rights without having taken them at birth first. This idea that all our rights and good things come from the government is highly dangerous.
ajgolfer1 1 year ago