The Electric Universe Pt1 of 4

[medeerbeer]

There is no need for you to disgrace science. Just write science fiction and a call it day. Excedpt that science fiction is at least inspiring, while your claims make you look ridiculous. Anyone who understands a bit of science knows that this is balloney. You are simply misleading people to sell something that you otherwise couldn't.

[jamiestoehr]

"billion... billion... billion... billion"

Does he not sound like Bill Murray in Caddy Shack?

[kajinsou]

Life, liberty and the pursuit of universal truth. Establishment provides credentials, ergo preservation of established theory trumps truth in this society. I'd spend a moment with a radical theorist before an indoctrinated genius.

[Typho0n86]

No matter how many grey old men without a degree you get to talk about this still doesnt make it right. LOL this theory is BS.

[laputahayom]

@Typho0n86

i know why don't they get some one who has a degree in cosmology rather then mythologist (2:42)

[Typho0n86]

@laputahayom Cause no cosmologist would agree with it

or was this a rhetorical question :P

[laputahayom]

@Typho0n86 no it was not.

[Typho0n86]

@laputahayom yes it was not no

[standauffish]

@Typho0n86 Prove its BS or STFU

[SL1200Ltd]

@Typho0n86 All great inventions are result of "thinking out of the box" so I think you're the one who should just shut up or come up with a better explanations to the phenomenons. I see this very convincing and rational even though the basics of the idea were maybe in mythology it does not make it any more stupid than any other theory and just because they don't have a certain degree doesn't discredit them immediately. If you're an intelligent person you'll weight the evidence without prejudice.

[Typho0n86]

@SL1200Ltd @1:30 only electric currents creat magnatic fields... Iron creats a magnatic field w/o eletricity (earth/star etc..). Most of the universe isnt plasma any ways, its hydrogen. And most of the pictures they are using are from supernova, which is a proof of blackholes, which this theory says doesnt exist.

[Minimessiah42]

@Typho0n86 you tiny minded smegface :-)

[Typho0n86]

@Minimessiah42 Thats the exact response i would expect from a baboon that has no idea about science :D Sucks to be you.

[ZajoSTi]

And altough I have no astrophysics education, in my understanding this theory explains how can a plasma-stream escape from the black hole gravitational sucking force. I always wondered about this. Until now, it starts to make sense.

[ZajoSTi]

This could explain why all that Tesla's breathtaking experiments were based on the electromagnetizm. Coulnd't it?

[JJJadm]

we can see the stars cause it's a light,however what about those who are not lights?

[JJJadm]

so it's not gravity? i always thought so.

[cosmicheretic]

It's funny listening to noobs try to refute a theory they know nothing about. Read Don Scott's "The Electric Sky' or at least some of his information at his site first before displaying your ignorance of the model he proposes. It should be required reading for all cosmologists to help their understanding of role electricity and plasma play in space.

[MightyZarkon]

Tesla claimed of a 'free' energy from the ether. Wouldn't the Electric Universe Theory justify Tesla's claim? Isn't this precisely why the Theory is refuted? Seems there is an establishment that seeks to keep a lid on things because the world is changing faster than they can control it. Free energy for all- life can be so much better. Scientists need to tear down the wall.

[LucifersArgument]

Plasma are ions, Yin and Yang particles.

[LucifersArgument]

Isaac Newton wasn't the first to state the law of gravity. This is the problem, people actually regurgitate the dumbed down version of history.

[LES6723]

Does anyone know why all these conceptions are called theories??

[tonia1313]

The music is too loud and annoying

[phallus0maximus]

No one's saying gravity doesn't exist and is responsible for various phenomena. I guess us "anti-gravity bores" just don't have the blind faith required to believe that its the only driving force in the universe.

[CofradeArrepentido]

@phallus0maximus I believe your point was about General Relativity, not gravity generally. On the other hand, no 'Establishment scientist', whatever the hell that means, has ever tried to explain the universe purely in terms of gravity. This is a tiresome misrepresentation repeated at virtually every 'Electric Universe' site or Youtube video. What is required by 'electric universe' enthusiats is a better knowledge of how science works and of science generally. Regards

[phallus0maximus]

@CofradeArrepentido I know how science works, one is supposed to develop theories based on empirical evidence, and discard those theories if they become implausible. Mathematics should be used as a definition of an established theory, not be conjured up as a proof when empirical evidence is lacking.

[CofradeArrepentido]

@phallus0maximus Actually how science works is somewhat more complicated than that. General relativity has become implausible? Have Maths really been conjured up to cover lack of empirical evidence? I feel this is going in circles so I'll leave it with a suggestion: Try to get a grasp of 'mainstream' cosmology - quite an assorted lot, let me tell ya - not through the jaundiced lens of 'electric universe' but of science and good sense. Be well.

[phallus0maximus]

General relativity will be a tough theory to break. So many scientists have built their careers around it and will be very unwilling to put it aside, even though they have to develop so many abstract and unprovable theories like dark matter and dark energy to make it work.

[ubergeraldine]

@phallus0maximus Alas they come from a cultural prison of ideas. It will keep them there like flat Earthers while the Universe does other things.

[CofradeArrepentido]

@ubergeraldine Yes, poor things trapped in a prison of ideas also known as 'science' and 'scientific method'.

[CofradeArrepentido]

@phallus0maximus It will be a tough cookie to break considering its uncanny ability to make verifiable - and already verified - predictions concerning such counterintuitive phenomena as time dilation or geodetic precession. But I'm sure anti-gravity bores will survive this particular ordeal.

[CofradeArrepentido]

I'm intrigued by the apparent absence of critical comments to this pseudocientific drivel. My educated guess: censorship.

[Maartenn100]

electricity = consciousness and consciousness is electricity. Electricity is the material form of consciousness.

[nickharvey7]

Neat video! I am an artist on YouTube trying to promote my theory on the dynamics of light and time

This theory is based on just two simple postulates

1. The first is that the quantum wave particle function explained by Schrödinger’s wave equation represents the forward passage of time itself

2. The second is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle that is formed by the wave function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event

[thelastone0001]

@nickharvey7 you know what that would mean right? it would mean that there are not mutiple universes that alow every possiblility. it would mean that there are many possible futures but our actions would collapse the probablity waves of outcome untill only one exsists. i never thought about that. no sliders like universe with many worlds. we effect the outcome by observance and interferance through our actions. intresting

[nickharvey7]

@thelastone0001 In this theory we have a process of continuous creation or change formed by the quantum wave particle function collapsing and reforming. We see and feel this continuous alternating between wave and particle as the continuous flow of time that will have the dimension of spacetime.

[LazyOtaku]

5:50 Anyone get the idea that DNA also resembles this?

[tacheonspeed79er]

@LazyOtaku 

[InsaneOo]

CERN has a lack of a graviton that says M theory is where it's at.

[Vern3666]

Very interesting idea that electrical currents (circuits) exist in interstellar space. This leads to the possibility that these may be organized in some way.

Organized currents can be sentient, example, the human brain. Do we see the mind of some great God when we look out at the universe.

Ten Million Dollar Wagman Trust.

[0dWHOHWb0]

"Magnetic fields are only formed through current"? What about minerals that are naturally magnettic?

And when he talks about a computer simulation done about two clusters of charged particles forming a galaxylike structure and saying the simulation had nothing to do with gravity.. Aren't the formulas for gravitational force and attraction of charged particles virtually the same?

What am I missing here?

[o0OCognizanceO0o]

@0dWHOHWb0 Magnets have magnetic field lines. These field lines are actually tubes of force i.e they are currents that manifest outside and around the magnet. Energy is stored between these tubes of force. In Dielectricity, the tubes of force is on the inside and energy is stored inside the materials.

[buddcinder]

@o0OCognizanceO0o Plus the fact that they are so important in making electric motors, and electric currents on a nail make an electric magnet.

[buddcinder]

@0dWHOHWb0 The differance is in cause or effect. Gravity is what we observe-the action of the bodies coming together. It could be that Its simply the effects of electric charges coming and going and moving about.

But I don't know or I'ld be in the video.

[BrainChild666]

at 9:33 look at 12oclock something shoots out of the galaxy pictured?

[superkay72]

@BrainChild666 ...Dude your Paranoid or High!! It's an Animated Picture...Not a Still Picture!!

[Aspanaut]

plasma is another way of saying hydrogen

[GateMessenger]

@Aspanaut Wouldn't plasma be another way of saying dark matter?

[Aspanaut]

Gravity is another way of saying magnetic field.

[GateMessenger]

@Aspanaut Gravity and magnetic fields are opposites. Gravity flows toward a planet and the magnetic field flows away. The two appear to complement one another like the Yin Yang symbol. For every action there is a an equal yet completely opposite reaction. The two have one thing in common though, either could be replaced with the other in mathematical equations. See why areas of the Sun appear to be darker, Sun spots, hence we see less light. Like g, magnetic fields effect light too.

[tristbjorn]

@GateMessenger Sunspots are formed by electromagnetic currents, but it's not preventing us from seeing the light. It's not emitting as much light.

[nirbija]

That background NOISE is totally unnecessary; and it SUCKS!

[Aspanaut]

Oh and think of this in reverse as well then u start ta get a picture of everything

[Aspanaut]

Lsd is the key ;]

[badstacksize]

@Aspanaut no DMT is the key

[Aspanaut]

I think we are just extensions of reality

Black Hole? or Proton?

Galaxy Supercluster? or Atom?

Galaxy Filament? or Molecule?

Gravity? or Magnetic Field?

Time? or Evolution?

LIfe? or Pre-Amino Acid?

Interstellar Medium? or Neutron?

Filamentary Universe? or Filamentary Reality??

[FixedByDoc]

this makes sense so far

[gman7111]

So why is blood called plasma? to conduct the electricity of the human body?

[SuperMagnetizer]

@gman7111 Irving Langmuir named named the 4th state of matter "plasma" after blood plasma, because it exhibited "lifelike" qualities of self-organization, cellular structures, etc. Plasma is actually the primary state of matter, solid, liquid, and gas being exceptions to the rule.

[ChristophDollis]

@gman7111

Plasma in the cell was named first. Plasma the state of matter seemed fluid and lifelike and was named after living plasma.

[AshangelV1]

@gman7111 You may well have something there, very interesting thought, thank you. Most of the Electricity is carried in the nervous system and meridians and also EMF.

But I always wondered why they chose plasma as the name for that medium. This makes sense when you consider the blood contains things known as electrolytes. Of course the test of a good theory would now be to try and disprove it, then see if it holds up to the most brutal scrutiny.

[castorini]

String theory come to my mind.