Okay so let's pretend that god made the earth in six days my mom went "Well in the bible it says that a thousand years is a day to god' Well that's still about forty nine billion years short of how old the earth is and though I'd like to believe god exists i doubt it so if we could all just co-exist without the violence and the ass wholes pressing there beliefs one to one another I feel everyone's quality of life would increase
@cloudrokes agreed, but that's not what happens is it?
So being realistic you'll just have to accept that some people simply insist on setting out to pass rubbish ideas around.
It does all tend to come from one corner too. I've yet to have a couple of atheists knock at my door to tell me of the wonders of there being no God.
Thankfully the God squad 'fuck off' when you politely tell them you are too educated to accept rubbish explanations for stuff everyone can find out online in 10 seconds.
you know if Dino's exisited in 1100ad like Hovind believes then I expect people would save trophy's. Those Trophy's would be found in the least as bones, but we have no bones we only have fossals.
@CapQuacer Well more than that entire skeletons of bones rather than fossils would be unearthed every day of the week.... but not one so far.
Its one of the things creationists just don't seem to understand...that to offer an explanation for something it must be grounded in at least some sort of reality... some of the statements should at least have some support from observation...and when everything is pointing in the opposite direction its time to wake up!
From heaven and thats what killed the dino's. not no meteor. or flood. than GOD reconstructed the world as in genesis the bible chapter, and than later through years GOD became furies because people or us humans were not listening. so he told a noble man AKA Noah to build an ark, bring his family and 2 of each animal. and GOD had flooded the earth. thats how it happened. not no flood and dino's died thats all wrong, read the bible man and u'll see!
This Is All A LIE. The flood did not destroy the dino's. before the time of jesus, GOD/ JEHOVA. had monsters or known today dino's that ruled the earth. Now there was an angel the beautiful-est Angel of all, now known as satin, now satin wanted power he wanted a spot next to GOD's Thrown but it was reserved for JESUS. and the other side is reserved for us humans, well only the ones who accepted Jesus as there savier in hearts. So GOD had seen the fury in him and told an angel to kick him.
I think it's funny how creationists try to be scientists but just get shitted on by people who actually have brains and don't believe 2000 year old fairy tails that co-existed with many others from different religions. Since there are DOZENS of religions out there and they came from a time when there was very little technology and people made up things to explain the unexplainable and those beliefs got passed on to each generation, obviously they all conflict each other and none are right.
@NathanH83 Sir Isaac Newton also thought you could turn lead to gold by heating it up and cooling it down....or mixing it in some way with other metals.
So as far as knowledge goes yep clearly Newton didn't know too much anywhere near as much about physics as the average 1st year physics student....which is precisely XxI3ioHazardxX 's point.... he didn't know... because he'd never heard of atoms!
Why doies someones religion lead you to believe they were right about everything?
@PirateXzibit Young earth creationists would, but that doesn't mean they look up to Kent Hovind as a leader and use his "arguments," that guy has almost no knowledge of even basic science
do ppl still believe in this crap????srsly??? n some r arguing ( below) to prove its true that man n dinosaurs coexisted.. WOW!! just wow... !!! my mother is uneducated woman but even she knows man evolved frm chimps n i live in a tiny village in india.. n im just amazed to see educated americans believin this "bible" fairytale.. just blows my mind.
Did you know there are many many other 'ways' to get the age of the earth? I could name them off. Also, please note as I've told you before, any 'inaccuracies' from radiometric dating come from Christian websites. Little biased, don't you think? There are reversals of the earth's magnetic poles in the bottom of the Atlantic, which are at least 80,000,000 years old.
@radioactiveego So do you think Richard Dawkins would state everything that is wrong with radio-metric dating-methods? Write it on his blog? A little biased that evolutionists don't go out and point out the giant holes in their theories? It would hurt their cause! They would lose their jobs! You can't say that Christians are "biased" when the opposition is equally as biased.
The people who knows that all of this is bogus, are naturally now Christians as a consequence.
Christians are biased, hypocrites. They say 'god' created everything, and it's automatically the Judeo-Christian god. But there are literally thousands of gods that all were in the imaginations of man before Christianity even existed. Not logical. The entire premise for religion is no more than argumentum ad nauseam, and argumentum ad numerum.
Yes, there are scientists who do indeed believe in creationism. I believe there was a total of 800 or so of these, we will call Pseudo-Scientists, that signed a document stating this not too long ago. Project Steve was started in response to this. More than a thousand scientists, with the first name of Steve, have signed Project Steve, which agrees with evolution. Doesn't it make you seem ridiculous for merely bringing up the fact that some scientists actually believe of creationism?
@Rcc6214 Okay, so a scientist who believes in the Genesis creation account is a Psuedo-Scientist, right? Which means that Isaac Newton, one of the best scientists of all time, was a Psuedo Scientist.
Is that what you are saying?
Isaac Newton believed in the six days of Creation.
"This most elegant system of the sun, planets, and comets could not have arisen without the design and dominion of a powerful and intelligent being."
Isaac Newton cam from a time when relatively nothing was known of the Earth's past. If we ever come close to discovering speed of light travel, you would be saying it would be impossible to do so because Einstein believed it to be. If Newton were alive in this day and age, he would sure be commenting against you just as I am.\
And Isacc Newton also believed in Alchemy. So what? In that day and age, if you didn't agree with the powerful church, you were killed by the church. A nice, loving group of people. 'Either believe in what we want you to, or you die' . Kepler was terrified of the Church, and Galileo was in prison due to the church.
@radioactiveego That would be the Catholic 'church', which is not Christian at all but an outgrowth of the ancient mystery religions of Babylon. Real Christians do not, and would not, ever commit murder.
@radioactiveego I'm not a Protestant, so you're incorrect in your assumption regarding my 'version' of Christianity. And I've no idea what you mean about Scotsmen, not that it matters in any way.
"Real Christians do not, and would not, ever commit murder."
Here's what a no true scotsman fallacy is:
"The No True Scotsman fallacy involves discounting evidence that would refute a proposition, concluding that it hasn’t been falsified when in fact it has."
@RBNightlinger It does in fact matter if you have an opinion on something and consider your opinion to carry the same weight as someone else's yet aren't informed well enough to form a valid opinion to begin with...
IF each time someone points out a danger of your belief you point out that 'No real christian would do that' well that's just not a valid answer.
Its like me stating no true politician would lie in public... fact is MOST of them do...and are by definition politicians.
@NathanH83 which scientists are these? do they also live in a church and butt rape children during lunchbreaks? look at the data more closely retard, there are many methods of dating fossils, some with alot more accuracy than others, people like you are clearl examples of natural selection in evolution, the stupider bunch i.e. you, still beleive fairy tales and lack the mental strength to have any critical thinking
@chinamanspeakenlis ARE YOU SERIOUS! DO YOU LIKE THE IDEA THAT YOU CAME FROM A CHIMP? WELL I DID NOT, NOR WILL I EVER BE. GOD MADE ME, WHO MADE YOU? BIBLE IS NOT A FAIRYTALE? READ WHAT JESUS SAYS IN NEW TESTAMENT, OR HAVE YOU EVER EVEN OPENED ONE? ALL HE SAID IN THE BIBLE IS COMING TRUE. GOD DOES NOT LIE, HE CAN NOT LIE. CALL ME WHAT EVER YOU WANT, BUT I BELIEVE IN GOD, IT IS BETTER THEN NOTHING THAT CAME FROM NOTHING.
And lastly, my reasoning for believing the hypothesis for the earth being 4000 years old is that we have directly written history in china older than 4,000 years old. Look that up. Lastly, we don't know what a day for god is compared to us, and if the earth didn't exist yet how could you measure one?
Secondly fossilization is caused by any type of laid down sediment, including sand in a desert. So that means it could have been a giant drought and had the same effect.
And carbon dating is very inaccurate past a certain time which is why they don't do it. Know the science before you make a hypothesis and embarrass christians like me.
Well unfortunately dinosaurs ARE NOT reptiles. They aren't even closely related to them, so that blows that theory out of the water right there. They are more closely related to birds. The other problem you also have now is that if people lived to be 900 years old you'd get to the beginning of time in just 4 generations, which unfortunately isn't the case in the bible either.
Well unfortunately dinosaurs ARE NOT reptiles. They aren't even closely related to them, so that blows that theory out of the water right there. They are more closely related to birds. The other problem you also have now is that if people lived to be 900 years old you'd get to the beginning of time in just 4 generations, which unfortunately isn't the case in the bible either.
Can you see the face of God and still live? Jacob saw god face to face and survived, yet john says it is not possible. we are down to about 6% assuming one is correct.
Job more or less says there are dinosaurs in it.. (from christian sites). So the fact that they are not mentioned...in that original timeline crushes any respectability of it being a reasonable timeline. It is not rational to believe they forgot to write about giant lizards hunting them down and eating them.
For instance, when they found Jesus missing at his tomb...did they have to roll away the stone, or was it already rolled back? You will find three different answers to this in the bible. Well now...if we assume one of these is correct, that puts the bible accuracy meter at 33%.
Did jesus cause the fig tree to wither? Three different answers still. Assuming one is right, bible accuracy is now at 11%.
Christians are hot to attack 15 different dating systems that all say the same thing. What if we were to try to debunk bible dating? First off, I would argue that even christians would agree that the bible is not a book of science and strict fact. There are clear discrepancies.
You are a moron. You clearly do not undestand science at all. In carbon dating you are dating radioactive isotopes of carbon, and in order to do that you need carbon present in the source material. Second, you cannot accurately date basaltic rock, or rock from lava flows, because the rock itself has been in the earth in the form of superheated plasma for billions of years before making its way to the surface. Third, animals, in fact all living creatures stop growing after puberty.
In humans this age is between 19 and 25. In most creatures it is within the first few decades of life that this process stops. At this time the bones fuse and cease to grow. Skin is still produced, as are hair and nails, which are made of dead skin. But this new skin simply replaces skin that dies. Last, but not least, there is no possible way that a global flood could take place. There is not enough liquid water to cover the entire surface area, and in most areas the water depth would be only
@ GuYoNtHeFuToNIn humans this age is between 19 and 25. In most creatures it is within the first few decades of life that this process stops. At this time the bones fuse and cease to grow. Skin is still produced, as are hair and nails, which are made of dead skin. But this new skin simply replaces skin that dies. Last, but not least, there is no possible way that a global flood could take place. There is not enough liquid water to cover the entire surface area, and in most areas the water depth
a few inches. While liquid water covers 75% of the earths surface, only .023% of the total mass of the earth is in fact liquid water. And there is no evidence that all of the water once covered the earth in a global flood. Don't hand me the grand canyon or great lakes argument either. I grew up with a fundamentalist creationist, and I've heard it all. But let me say you have done nothing to explain the KT boundary. Know what that is? It's the ash layer left behind by the asteroid that hit the
earth 65 million years ago. It left behind Iridium in the layer, an element that is not heavily present on the earth. And we can observe the process of erosion and know that the grand canyon could not have formed in 20,000 years, let alone 4,000 and that the earth being covered in water does not erode the sea floor enough to create such a unique geological feature. Here's an idea: go take a science class and know what your saying before posting again.
I am actually ok with this guys beliefs. As long as his fantasy doesn't get into the class room, let him believe what he wants. I for one will teach the truth to my children not ignorance that this man believes in.
@RBNightlinger Actually the Federal Income tax is unconstitutional. When the IRS throws people in prison for not paying Federal Income tax they're actually breaking the law. Jesus talked about tax collectors, and He always listed them with prostitutes. They have no business imprisoning innocent people. But, Kent was unwise not to pay. Even Jesus payed the temple tax, though he did make a point that He should not be required to pay. Jesus just payed it so He didn't offend them.
@sweatytoothmadman You are confusing the words of Jesus with the constitution.
Yes, Jesus said to go ahead and pay taxes even though they are wrongly forced upon people. He said this so that you don't offend them. But Jesus is not the constitution.
In the constitution, our forefathers did not allow for indirect taxes such as a tax on your labor. But the 16th ammendment allows for it.
This video description is absolutely hilarious!! I can't tell if your being serious or making a good parody! Never in the history of mankind has the average lifespan of human been anywhere near 900 years. The rate of lifespan is an increasing one, not a decreasing one. No man, or woman has ever lived past 121 years of age.
@ajf1060 You have completely disregarded biblical history and are therefore being intellectually dishonest. How do you know that the genealogical account from Adam to Noah is untrue? Were you there?
Did you know that there are certain parts of the human skull that never stop growing? Like the brow ridge, for instance. Did you know that if a person lived for 400 years their skull would look just like a Neanderthal skull? Neanderthals are scientific evidence supporting the genealogy in Genesis.
@NathanH83 That is the dumbest theory I have ever heard. Neanderthals bone structure in general was completely different than modern day humans. Pelvic/hip bones, femurs, feet. We evolved from them.
intellectually dishonest? Are you serious? So, you're an idiot if you don't believe in a talking snake, or a guy living to be 900 years old, or a guy coming back from the dead, or a man talking to a cloud?
If God is an all powerful God, then He has the power to speak through whatever He wants to speak through.
Therefore, if you say that an All Powerful God is incapable of speaking through a donkey, or a cloud, or a firey bush, then yes, you are being intellectually dishonest.
And since God has this power, then He would be able to delegate this power to angels, like Lucifer, who talked through a snake.
I guess I am intellectually dishonest because I don't believe in a book that is full of nonsense. Actually, this video is nonsense. The comments are nonsense. Your 'dating flaws' are ALL FROM CHRISTIAN SITES. You're a hypocrite. You copy-and-paste things from christian sites.
You made a big mistake in the video description; Kent Hovind is not a doctor. He bought his 'Dr' for $250, and there are recordings of him trying to lie to the feds about property w/ his son. (LOL)
@radioactiveego Okay, well, may the Lord bless you and reveal Himself to you. He loves you very much and wants you to come to a knowledge of Him.
Pray and ask God to prove Himself to you.
Isaac Newton said, "This most elegant system of the sun planets and comets could not have arisen without the design and dominion of a powerful and intelligent being."
"Millions of innocent men, women and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined and imprisoned; yet we have not advanced one inch towards uniformity."
Jefferson was against the church having much influence in the government. They were also against having a state sponsored religion (YA!) Their creator doesn't reference the christian god (period.)
I've written a dozen papers on him and others about their separation of church and state, and Jefferson did not sign the letters 'In the Year of our Lord Christ'. Glenn Beck said that on Fox news which was bogus, and the papers he supposedly wrote that on, already had it at the end.
@NathanH83 Instead of quote mining say some more of Newton quotations. "The Bible instructs one on how to get to Heaven and NOT HOW THE HEAVENS WORK".
It seems a lot of the "creation-science" that creationist use centers around "Noah's flood". I love how all of their "theories" center around a story that is indistinguishable from mythology. So "Noah" built a vessel smaller than the Titanic which fit a couple thousand people and instead fit around 17 million species of animals, enough food to feed them all, and water for them to drink. Not that it matters since all of the animals would have froze to death as the water was above "the mountains".
if a flood covered the earth a few thousand years ago, how did fresh water fish and other animals that would die in salt water survive? I ate a fresh water trout for dinner a few nights ago and i have the understanding that the animal could not have survived in a world-wide ocean. HELP! Satan is attacking my brain with logic! help me!!!!
@doctorr2 First of all, the oceans are becoming more salty. Which means, logically, that they used to be less salty.
The oceans today are about 3% salt. They could have done that in 5 or 6 thousand years.
In the days of Noah, the oceans would have been mostly freshwater. Which means all the fish would have been freshwater fish originally. They've slowly adapted to the rising salt level.
Scientists have turned freshwater fish into saltwater fish in two weeks by adding salt to the tank.
@NathanH83 Really scientists turned freshwater fish into saftwater fish in two weeks? can you reference that statement? So you believe the oceans were freshwater a few thousand years ago. What's your theory on why they get salty?
@doctorr2 there is no theory as to why they get salty. we know for a fact that they get salty due to rivers carrying with them mineral salts. water and salt flow into the ocean, but only the water evaporates out. salt does not evaporate out of the oceans. this is the same reason why the dead sea is salty and the sea of Galilee is not.
research stickleback fish, and you'll find that they have diverged into two subspecies: saltwater dwellers, and freshwater dwellers.
@EvolvingMinds777 will researching stickleback fish help me believe that scientists turn freshwater fish into saltwater fish in two weeks by adding salt to the water they were swimming in?
@meldidnot Noah didn't take insects onto the ark. He took all the animals that have the breath of life in their nostrils. Insects don't have the breath of life in their nostrils. They breath through their skin.
Insects can survive a flood. Go to any place where it's just flooded, when the water runs off, what's the first thing you see? Insects by the zillions.
They take refuge on floating debris, carcasses, or just by burrowing in the mud.
This video is an example of how dangerous religion is to education. Sadly some creationist is going to teach this ridiculous crap to their kids who will grow up thinking the world is 6000 years old and that Noah's ark actually happened. Mythology is no substitute for reality, and science and it never will be.
@jisaid08 I believe that the Bible is reality, just like Isaac Newton did, and just like our president, and past presidents did, including Wasington, Lincoln, Jefferson, Adams, Roosevelt, and many more.
@NathanH83 Isaac Newton also believed in alchemy, and many presidents consult psychics as well. Naming important people who believe in something in no way improves it's validity. You believe the Bible is reality, but that in no way makes it reality. Science can, however, be observed, tested, and analyzed which does make it reality. Science has an track record of producing results which can be quantitatively and qualitatively measured. The Bible is a collection of myths nothing more.
@jisaid08 If you believe in evolution then you believe in alchemy as well. Alchemy is the idea of turning metals into gold. If you believe that all of the elements evolved, then you also believe that it is possible to fuse metals into gold.
@NathanH83 Evolution and alchemy are completely unrelated. Evolution explains the diversity of life on Earth through means of genetic mutation, and the adaptation of species to their environments. Alchemy is the idea that the elements can be changed into gold through some chemical process, which is not true. Elements do not evolve as they are non-living substances made of one type of atom which defines them. Comparing elements to living creatures is absurd and only makes you look foolish.
@jisaid08 Ah, so now you're denying chemical evolution. So you don't believe the table of elements came about through some random process. Neither do I. The elements were created by an intelligent designer. So you see things my way now.
@NathanH83 Chemical evolution and alchemy are not the same thing. Are you actually Kent Hovind? Chemical evolution does happen through atomic fusion in stars. Combining two or more atoms into one to form a new atom with a heavier nucleus does happen. However, that is very different than alchemy which involves mixing chemicals and hoping they'll turn to gold. I seriously doubt I see anything your way sir as you live in some sort of denial from reality where the Bible seems to pervade.
@NathanH83 No he didn't because at the time there wasn't a massive amount of evidence that proved the Bible wrong. However, there is now so you are in denial because you refuse to accept the evidence in front of you. Isaac Newton did not have the luxury of modern science so he has an excuse, you do not.
@EvolvingMinds777 I wouldn't miss examples of what you're saying for all the tea in China. Please tell me how any of the Bible is proved correct with any sort of evidence anywhere. Give me massive amounts of evidence that any of the stories in the Bible which are impossible by the way happened.
@jisaid08 No reply...interesting...because there is no evidence? The only thing the Bible offers evidence of is that there is a book called "The Bible".
@NathanH83 Why would I read a book by someone who died in the 19th century and had no access to modern information when I have a wealth of scientific knowledge from the 21st century? Before you say it, yes Darwin lived in that era, and yes he was right. But honestly he was lucky and made keen observations but he didn't understand WHY he was right. It took nearly a 100 years for scientist to prove him correct with genetics. Darwin was a genius and a little lucky. Maury was not.
@NathanH83 Ok that's fine. How is it relevant to how the Bible is correct about anything? Is the basis of your argument "smart people have believed in the Bible"? I mean clearly that doesn't "prove the Bible", it simply proves that some people no matter how intelligent they are also hold religious beliefs.
@NathanH83 that doesn't make sense. How can you compare inanimate base elements (which make up living life forms) to evolution, which is the change in animate, living forms made of a multitude of elements ?
@Gromgaw you know, one time someone told me that cosmology is not evolution. then I read the dictionary definition of cosmology, and it said "the evolution of the universe"
Obviously there is more than one type of evolution other than macro-evolution. There is cosmic evolution, chemical evolution, organic evolution, micro-evolution, and macro-evolution.
@NathanH83 Cosmology isn't biological evolution, no. Not when we speak of apes and men which is the specific concept that Creationists and Scientists argue about. With a loose translation of the word, every single thing on this earth evolves. Languages evolve, recipes evolve, with new rules and new formats baseball has evolved into the sport it is today. When debating the evolution of man, nothing else is relevant. The evolution of stars has nothing to do with the evolution of man.
I just watched this and I don't want to be in the middle of any ones argument . I actually found this interesting. Do I agree or not agree? well the video actually sort of makes seance. Why am I in the mood to watch Deerassic Park? I used the video tape for recording a fighting style off from theTV oh well I guess I will have to go rent it
From your description in the video i have a few things to point out. Carbon has a half life of around 5700 years and can only be used to measure rocks and fossils ages up to 50-60,000 years ago so it is pointless to use that as there would be no trace of it left in the fossils. They use Uranium- Lead dating to measure the amount of radioactivity as Uranium- Lead has a half life of around 700 million years giving a more precise representation of the age of the fossil. Thanks for the video :D
How does it feel to know that anyone who come on to your video is an atheist, or a Christian just looking to reinforce their beliefs, not caring whether or not they are true. As well those on the fence can easily find refutes to these weak arguments that are actually presented with Evidence and reason and not bible quotes and nonsense.
The internet is where religion comes to die, after all most of these videos are down voted like crazy, but "Crazy atheist haters" down rate them, right l o l
Mr. Nathan, I have helped children in poverty, lived a selfless life, loved and respected my neighbors. I have always been honest kind loving and caring. You're suggesting that because I don't believe words written in some random book, the creator of the universe is going to overlook every kind thing I have ever done, and throw me into a lake of fire with people who actually deserve to go (You know rapists child molesters, killers, etc. etc.)?
@NathanH83 I never said I wanted god's stuff and what exactly is god's stuff? Are you talking about his jizz or something? Enlighten me please. Also tell me why I deserve to burn in a lake of fire, for being such a decent human being, with all the other child molesters, rapist etc?
"but you don't want him"
Why exactly would I want him? I am not a homosexual for one, and number two is it even possible to fall in love with god? Or am I taking this completely out of context? Enlighten me please.
@Depravedmaniac666 What exactly is God's stuff? Well, God created air. Do you want to breathe? Or do you want oxygen taken away from you, since you abhor the one who created oxygen.
God created water. Do you want to keep drinking it?
God created plants, including oranges, wheat, corn, potatoes, and every other plant you've ever eaten. Do you want those taken away from you?
God created all the things that your clothes are made of, and your house, and your car.
@Depravedmaniac666 a building must have a builder. a painting must have a painter. an engine must have an engineer. electric wiring must have an electrician. plumbing must have a plumber. a biologically engineered plant cell must have a biological engineer.
one single plant cell is more complex than the U.S. space shuttle (the shuttle costs 2 billion dollars, by the way). How must more wonderfully complex and costly is the body God provided you?
@NathanH83 I've read some of the comments that you have put here and others place. I respectfully ask that you shut up read a book that does not deal with your Sky God before stating idiotic things such as this.
Oh, and a pot is an inanimate object that does not have abilities to think in any way....So, what exactly was your point?
Damn this video is tight! Brother Hovind is right on with this one. Great video. The Bible cannot be refuted. This video clearly shows the wisdom of believers. You can gain knowledge by educating your self, but wisdom only comes from God. Great video once again!
and at some point in their eternal growth they change into a different species and never give off springs that would be the regular size of reptiles -.-
@sabertooth1980 I joined YouTube in May, 2010, and the first time I saw this and heard Hovind's voice say, "Gawd created the earth in six days..." I thought this was a parody of creationism and I laughed out loud. Sorry to say, these folks actually believe this pre-school stuff. Sad, huh?
@MrPocketWatch1The reason why no one has found Noah's Ark is because people are spending tens of thousands of dollars looking in the wrong spot. They're all looking on Mt. Ararat in Turkey.
However, the Bible says that the ark rested on the mountains (plural) of Ararat, which are in Turkey AND in Iran.
According to the biblical evidence presented by Bob Cornuke, it should be in Iran.
If people would do the research before ignorantly wasting their money, we would have found it by now.
@NathanH83 I've been to the mountains of Ararat in Iran, whent around all of them in a few weeks. Found nothing but a few small groups mad people similar to the Taliban.
@MrPocketWatch1 Well, Bob Cornuke went to the mountains of Ararat in Iran, using the Bible as his map and his guide. And he found what looked like a boat on top of one of the mountains.
Like I said, if people would do their research before ignorantly wasting their money, they would have found it by now.
@MrPocketWatch1 Wow, you can read Wikipedia. Good for you. Too bad you misquoted Wikipedia. Read it again.
It says that Bob Cornuke isn't COMPLETELY convinced that it was Noah's Ark. The truth is, he doesn't know. However, he and the Base Institute believe that what they've found is a candidate for being Noah's Ark. They have 10 significant pieces of evidence suggesting this may in fact be Noah's Ark. But they don't make the claim that they know for sure.
@NathanH83 Was'nt tryin to be specific, it had to fit into a comment for god's sake. Did Bob take any photos of what he found? I couldn't find his website.
@Depravedmaniac666 I think having anyone answer you questions would be pointless, unless you have honest questions and want to find the truth, if not, I'll just take your username for what it means; Depravedmaniac666. =/
@NathanH83 they have found it, its in the mountains OF Ararat, but not ON Mt. Ararat.(30 miles souht of ararat i belive) Technically they have not "confirmed" its the arc because they dont have the permits to excavate yet, but its been measured to accuratly have the same dimesnions as the arc in the bible and 4 differnt types of metal detectors were used on it and confirmed it has a framwork, hull, supports, and all the parts a BOAT would have. also abnormaly large anchor stones found ....
@NathanH83 in the valley of where the arc was.. theese stones are MUCH larger than any average sized anchor stones that were used at the same time period of the arc in the mediteranian. Also, the bible says, the landing point was at Ararat, or close to it. ALSO, on the anchor stones there are 8 crosses, indicating the 8 survivors of the arc (noahs famiily). The arc also sits on sedimentary rock formed by water(the flood) i can link you to the video if you want. Its great and full of evidence.
@NathanH83 Also, the arc is found at 6000+ feet above sea level. How would a boat equal to the size of the titanic get 6000 feet above sea level? UNLESS... 6000 feet WAS sea level, hence the flood... by no means am i attacking you, dont take it as if im coming at you, im just stating the facts for all to see. god bless, i love your videos.
dinosaurs were left off the ark because they were not created by god to begin with, but rather when the fallen angels came and mixed species together to appear as gods to mankind and provoke the anger of the lord. Genesis says "all things had become corrupt" reading the lost books of the bible really pulls things together. a day was a thousand years and a thousand years is as a day. it says that several times yet people still think dinosaurs were able to procreate or grow old in 6 days?
There is no proof for anything you say....bible stories....King James 4th wrote the bible, expect him to know anything like that for real? It's fake clearly. Just a little passage on how to get through life easier.
okay so supposedly god told noah to save the dinosaurs on the ark so that they could just go extinct. sounds like a load of bullshit. it would make more sense if you just threw god and the bible out of the window and embraced science and reason.
this video make cannot be that dumb..No they probly would never get full grown dino's or any other type of animal..most they could bring the babies,or eggs of each kind..Wow i guess if you do not read the Bible..you might actually make a video like this to bash someone lol..They have found Noahs Ark,his village,his home and now Dino's with skin and blood still red blood cells within..Evolution is falling apart like a cheap lie...But atleast they make us laugh lol
@BudPeters44 What a crock of shit. Gee ya think proof there was an Ark would be a bit more high profile than a creationist on youtube? What is falling apart is that its ok believe a load of dogshit written by goat herders 3000 years ago filled with easily proven falsehoods and lies to support false prophecies. Your religion is based upon things proven wrong years ago but as always Faith Makes you Impervious to Reason. If i had a time machine you STILL wouldnt throw up your idiot bible.
@Dhadzinsky lmao..calm down you little soldier of Satan lol..why in the world are you watching this if you hate the thought God existing ??? are you stupid or what ? lol.I don't get why you seeds of Satan who dont believe in God fight like the devil against him..I mean if he does'nt exist why waist one second of your life fight something that is'nt real ? that huge Oxymoron you know lol.Its like punching at oxygen in the air,you cannot see it but you know it exist.Your a clown lol..,go get'm lol
@Dhadzinsky by the way,the ark is fact,so is Noahs village,his home and grave sight along with much more..Pull your head from the sand and educate yourself..or stay stupid if you like your choice lol.
Okay so let's pretend that god made the earth in six days my mom went "Well in the bible it says that a thousand years is a day to god' Well that's still about forty nine billion years short of how old the earth is and though I'd like to believe god exists i doubt it so if we could all just co-exist without the violence and the ass wholes pressing there beliefs one to one another I feel everyone's quality of life would increase
cloudrokes 2 months ago
@cloudrokes agreed, but that's not what happens is it?
So being realistic you'll just have to accept that some people simply insist on setting out to pass rubbish ideas around.
It does all tend to come from one corner too. I've yet to have a couple of atheists knock at my door to tell me of the wonders of there being no God.
Thankfully the God squad 'fuck off' when you politely tell them you are too educated to accept rubbish explanations for stuff everyone can find out online in 10 seconds.
MumblingMickey 3 weeks ago
I can find so many problems with this mans claims, without even getting into the problems with Nhoas flood
grey9438 4 months ago
you know if Dino's exisited in 1100ad like Hovind believes then I expect people would save trophy's. Those Trophy's would be found in the least as bones, but we have no bones we only have fossals.
CapQuacer 5 months ago
@CapQuacer Well more than that entire skeletons of bones rather than fossils would be unearthed every day of the week.... but not one so far.
Its one of the things creationists just don't seem to understand...that to offer an explanation for something it must be grounded in at least some sort of reality... some of the statements should at least have some support from observation...and when everything is pointing in the opposite direction its time to wake up!
MumblingMickey 3 weeks ago
From heaven and thats what killed the dino's. not no meteor. or flood. than GOD reconstructed the world as in genesis the bible chapter, and than later through years GOD became furies because people or us humans were not listening. so he told a noble man AKA Noah to build an ark, bring his family and 2 of each animal. and GOD had flooded the earth. thats how it happened. not no flood and dino's died thats all wrong, read the bible man and u'll see!
12VIIVII 5 months ago
This Is All A LIE. The flood did not destroy the dino's. before the time of jesus, GOD/ JEHOVA. had monsters or known today dino's that ruled the earth. Now there was an angel the beautiful-est Angel of all, now known as satin, now satin wanted power he wanted a spot next to GOD's Thrown but it was reserved for JESUS. and the other side is reserved for us humans, well only the ones who accepted Jesus as there savier in hearts. So GOD had seen the fury in him and told an angel to kick him.
12VIIVII 5 months ago
I think it's funny how creationists try to be scientists but just get shitted on by people who actually have brains and don't believe 2000 year old fairy tails that co-existed with many others from different religions. Since there are DOZENS of religions out there and they came from a time when there was very little technology and people made up things to explain the unexplainable and those beliefs got passed on to each generation, obviously they all conflict each other and none are right.
XxI3ioHazardxX 6 months ago
@XxI3ioHazardxX Sir Isaac Newton believed that God created the world. Are you suggesting that he doesn't have a brain?
Not to mention Matthew Maury, the founder of oceanography, was a Christian who believed the Bible.
NathanH83 6 months ago 3
@NathanH83 Sir Isaac Newton also thought you could turn lead to gold by heating it up and cooling it down....or mixing it in some way with other metals.
So as far as knowledge goes yep clearly Newton didn't know too much anywhere near as much about physics as the average 1st year physics student....which is precisely XxI3ioHazardxX 's point.... he didn't know... because he'd never heard of atoms!
Why doies someones religion lead you to believe they were right about everything?
MumblingMickey 3 weeks ago
@XxI3ioHazardxX LOL, i guess it depends on your definition of "true scientist"
the great scientific minds in human history - newton and Tesla believed in the Bible
gannable 1 month ago
Comment removed
XxI3ioHazardxX 1 month ago
Kent Hovind is an absolute joke. Even his fellow creationists know that. So anyone who uses his arguments is obviously an idiot.
carlsm95 6 months ago 5
@carlsm95 I think every creationist would agree with the global flood, the dinosaurs on the ark and so forth.
PirateXzibit 6 months ago
@PirateXzibit Young earth creationists would, but that doesn't mean they look up to Kent Hovind as a leader and use his "arguments," that guy has almost no knowledge of even basic science
carlsm95 6 months ago
This is still the funniest thing I've ever seen on YouTube. LOL!!!
jdh501 6 months ago
Dinosaurs are closer to birds than reptiles.
FatCaterpillar11 8 months ago
do ppl still believe in this crap????srsly??? n some r arguing ( below) to prove its true that man n dinosaurs coexisted.. WOW!! just wow... !!! my mother is uneducated woman but even she knows man evolved frm chimps n i live in a tiny village in india.. n im just amazed to see educated americans believin this "bible" fairytale.. just blows my mind.
chinamanspeakenlis 8 months ago
@chinamanspeakenlis It blows my mind to see how incredibly uneducated you are on the inaccuracies of radiometric dating.
You are so confident that dinosaur remains are millions of years old, and yet you don't even know how inaccurate the age estimation systems are.
New rock in the form of hardened lava flows produced age estimates of 3 billion years when they were actually less than 200 years old.
Scientists with Ph.D's believe that dinosaurs are 3 or 4 thousand years old.
NathanH83 8 months ago
@NathanH83
Did you know there are many many other 'ways' to get the age of the earth? I could name them off. Also, please note as I've told you before, any 'inaccuracies' from radiometric dating come from Christian websites. Little biased, don't you think? There are reversals of the earth's magnetic poles in the bottom of the Atlantic, which are at least 80,000,000 years old.
radioactiveego 8 months ago
Comment removed
PirateXzibit 6 months ago
@radioactiveego So do you think Richard Dawkins would state everything that is wrong with radio-metric dating-methods? Write it on his blog? A little biased that evolutionists don't go out and point out the giant holes in their theories? It would hurt their cause! They would lose their jobs! You can't say that Christians are "biased" when the opposition is equally as biased.
The people who knows that all of this is bogus, are naturally now Christians as a consequence.
PirateXzibit 6 months ago
@PirateXzibit
Christians are biased, hypocrites. They say 'god' created everything, and it's automatically the Judeo-Christian god. But there are literally thousands of gods that all were in the imaginations of man before Christianity even existed. Not logical. The entire premise for religion is no more than argumentum ad nauseam, and argumentum ad numerum.
What nonsense.
radioactiveego 6 months ago
@NathanH83
Yes, there are scientists who do indeed believe in creationism. I believe there was a total of 800 or so of these, we will call Pseudo-Scientists, that signed a document stating this not too long ago. Project Steve was started in response to this. More than a thousand scientists, with the first name of Steve, have signed Project Steve, which agrees with evolution. Doesn't it make you seem ridiculous for merely bringing up the fact that some scientists actually believe of creationism?
Rcc6214 6 months ago
@Rcc6214 Okay, so a scientist who believes in the Genesis creation account is a Psuedo-Scientist, right? Which means that Isaac Newton, one of the best scientists of all time, was a Psuedo Scientist.
Is that what you are saying?
Isaac Newton believed in the six days of Creation.
"This most elegant system of the sun, planets, and comets could not have arisen without the design and dominion of a powerful and intelligent being."
-Isaac Newton, The Principia, General Scholium.
NathanH83 6 months ago
@NathanH83
Isaac Newton cam from a time when relatively nothing was known of the Earth's past. If we ever come close to discovering speed of light travel, you would be saying it would be impossible to do so because Einstein believed it to be. If Newton were alive in this day and age, he would sure be commenting against you just as I am.\
Rcc6214 6 months ago
@Rcc6214 IF Newton were alive today??? You're only comeback is a hypothetical situation?
What if this? What if that? What if the world was flat? Why don't we just continue to avoid facing the facts in favor of a hypothetical situation?
The fact is that Newton, one of the best scientists of all time, believed that God created the world in 6 days.
And you're calling him a Psuedo-Sceintist?
You're being intellectually dishonest.
NathanH83 6 months ago
@NathanH83
And Isacc Newton also believed in Alchemy. So what? In that day and age, if you didn't agree with the powerful church, you were killed by the church. A nice, loving group of people. 'Either believe in what we want you to, or you die' . Kepler was terrified of the Church, and Galileo was in prison due to the church.
radioactiveego 6 months ago
@radioactiveego That would be the Catholic 'church', which is not Christian at all but an outgrowth of the ancient mystery religions of Babylon. Real Christians do not, and would not, ever commit murder.
RBNightlinger 2 months ago
@RBNightlinger
Those 'Catholics' are responsible for your version of Christianity. And I love it how you use the 'no true Scotsman fallacy' to justify religion.
radioactiveego 2 months ago
@radioactiveego I'm not a Protestant, so you're incorrect in your assumption regarding my 'version' of Christianity. And I've no idea what you mean about Scotsmen, not that it matters in any way.
RBNightlinger 2 months ago
@RBNightlinger
"Real Christians do not, and would not, ever commit murder."
Here's what a no true scotsman fallacy is:
"The No True Scotsman fallacy involves discounting evidence that would refute a proposition, concluding that it hasn’t been falsified when in fact it has."
radioactiveego 1 month ago
@RBNightlinger It does in fact matter if you have an opinion on something and consider your opinion to carry the same weight as someone else's yet aren't informed well enough to form a valid opinion to begin with...
IF each time someone points out a danger of your belief you point out that 'No real christian would do that' well that's just not a valid answer.
Its like me stating no true politician would lie in public... fact is MOST of them do...and are by definition politicians.
MumblingMickey 3 weeks ago
@NathanH83 which scientists are these? do they also live in a church and butt rape children during lunchbreaks? look at the data more closely retard, there are many methods of dating fossils, some with alot more accuracy than others, people like you are clearl examples of natural selection in evolution, the stupider bunch i.e. you, still beleive fairy tales and lack the mental strength to have any critical thinking
MrDzver 6 months ago
@chinamanspeakenlis ARE YOU SERIOUS! DO YOU LIKE THE IDEA THAT YOU CAME FROM A CHIMP? WELL I DID NOT, NOR WILL I EVER BE. GOD MADE ME, WHO MADE YOU? BIBLE IS NOT A FAIRYTALE? READ WHAT JESUS SAYS IN NEW TESTAMENT, OR HAVE YOU EVER EVEN OPENED ONE? ALL HE SAID IN THE BIBLE IS COMING TRUE. GOD DOES NOT LIE, HE CAN NOT LIE. CALL ME WHAT EVER YOU WANT, BUT I BELIEVE IN GOD, IT IS BETTER THEN NOTHING THAT CAME FROM NOTHING.
2lovenature 8 months ago
And lastly, my reasoning for believing the hypothesis for the earth being 4000 years old is that we have directly written history in china older than 4,000 years old. Look that up. Lastly, we don't know what a day for god is compared to us, and if the earth didn't exist yet how could you measure one?
badpeach 10 months ago
Secondly fossilization is caused by any type of laid down sediment, including sand in a desert. So that means it could have been a giant drought and had the same effect.
And carbon dating is very inaccurate past a certain time which is why they don't do it. Know the science before you make a hypothesis and embarrass christians like me.
badpeach 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Well unfortunately dinosaurs ARE NOT reptiles. They aren't even closely related to them, so that blows that theory out of the water right there. They are more closely related to birds. The other problem you also have now is that if people lived to be 900 years old you'd get to the beginning of time in just 4 generations, which unfortunately isn't the case in the bible either.
badpeach 10 months ago
Well unfortunately dinosaurs ARE NOT reptiles. They aren't even closely related to them, so that blows that theory out of the water right there. They are more closely related to birds. The other problem you also have now is that if people lived to be 900 years old you'd get to the beginning of time in just 4 generations, which unfortunately isn't the case in the bible either.
badpeach 10 months ago
Can you see the face of God and still live? Jacob saw god face to face and survived, yet john says it is not possible. we are down to about 6% assuming one is correct.
Job more or less says there are dinosaurs in it.. (from christian sites). So the fact that they are not mentioned...in that original timeline crushes any respectability of it being a reasonable timeline. It is not rational to believe they forgot to write about giant lizards hunting them down and eating them.
radioactiveego 10 months ago
For instance, when they found Jesus missing at his tomb...did they have to roll away the stone, or was it already rolled back? You will find three different answers to this in the bible. Well now...if we assume one of these is correct, that puts the bible accuracy meter at 33%.
Did jesus cause the fig tree to wither? Three different answers still. Assuming one is right, bible accuracy is now at 11%.
radioactiveego 10 months ago
Now, on to the video.
Christians are hot to attack 15 different dating systems that all say the same thing. What if we were to try to debunk bible dating? First off, I would argue that even christians would agree that the bible is not a book of science and strict fact. There are clear discrepancies.
radioactiveego 10 months ago
Someone below is pretty upset about finding out the truth. The truth is unfolding while science keeps coming up with different theories.
TheAwakened888 11 months ago
You are a moron. You clearly do not undestand science at all. In carbon dating you are dating radioactive isotopes of carbon, and in order to do that you need carbon present in the source material. Second, you cannot accurately date basaltic rock, or rock from lava flows, because the rock itself has been in the earth in the form of superheated plasma for billions of years before making its way to the surface. Third, animals, in fact all living creatures stop growing after puberty.
GuYoNtHeFuToN 11 months ago
In humans this age is between 19 and 25. In most creatures it is within the first few decades of life that this process stops. At this time the bones fuse and cease to grow. Skin is still produced, as are hair and nails, which are made of dead skin. But this new skin simply replaces skin that dies. Last, but not least, there is no possible way that a global flood could take place. There is not enough liquid water to cover the entire surface area, and in most areas the water depth would be only
GuYoNtHeFuToN 11 months ago
@ GuYoNtHeFuToNIn humans this age is between 19 and 25. In most creatures it is within the first few decades of life that this process stops. At this time the bones fuse and cease to grow. Skin is still produced, as are hair and nails, which are made of dead skin. But this new skin simply replaces skin that dies. Last, but not least, there is no possible way that a global flood could take place. There is not enough liquid water to cover the entire surface area, and in most areas the water depth
GuYoNtHeFuToN 11 months ago
a few inches. While liquid water covers 75% of the earths surface, only .023% of the total mass of the earth is in fact liquid water. And there is no evidence that all of the water once covered the earth in a global flood. Don't hand me the grand canyon or great lakes argument either. I grew up with a fundamentalist creationist, and I've heard it all. But let me say you have done nothing to explain the KT boundary. Know what that is? It's the ash layer left behind by the asteroid that hit the
GuYoNtHeFuToN 11 months ago
earth 65 million years ago. It left behind Iridium in the layer, an element that is not heavily present on the earth. And we can observe the process of erosion and know that the grand canyon could not have formed in 20,000 years, let alone 4,000 and that the earth being covered in water does not erode the sea floor enough to create such a unique geological feature. Here's an idea: go take a science class and know what your saying before posting again.
GuYoNtHeFuToN 11 months ago
I am actually ok with this guys beliefs. As long as his fantasy doesn't get into the class room, let him believe what he wants. I for one will teach the truth to my children not ignorance that this man believes in.
thedustingoff1 1 year ago
WHAT IS THIS MADNESS
generalflood 1 year ago
Well, hello there, Kent. How's prison? Gonna start paying your taxes when you get out? Or should I say, IF you get out?
RBNightlinger 1 year ago
@RBNightlinger Actually the Federal Income tax is unconstitutional. When the IRS throws people in prison for not paying Federal Income tax they're actually breaking the law. Jesus talked about tax collectors, and He always listed them with prostitutes. They have no business imprisoning innocent people. But, Kent was unwise not to pay. Even Jesus payed the temple tax, though he did make a point that He should not be required to pay. Jesus just payed it so He didn't offend them.
NathanH83 1 year ago
@NathanH83
"Actually the Federal Income tax is unconstitutional. "
Actually it is not. The Bible says give to Ceasar what is Ceasar and give to god what is gods.
sweatytoothmadman 1 year ago
@sweatytoothmadman You are confusing the words of Jesus with the constitution.
Yes, Jesus said to go ahead and pay taxes even though they are wrongly forced upon people. He said this so that you don't offend them. But Jesus is not the constitution.
In the constitution, our forefathers did not allow for indirect taxes such as a tax on your labor. But the 16th ammendment allows for it.
NathanH83 1 year ago
@NathanH83
I phrased what I said incorrectly but it is constitutional.
sweatytoothmadman 1 year ago
This video description is absolutely hilarious!! I can't tell if your being serious or making a good parody! Never in the history of mankind has the average lifespan of human been anywhere near 900 years. The rate of lifespan is an increasing one, not a decreasing one. No man, or woman has ever lived past 121 years of age.
ajf1060 1 year ago
@ajf1060 You have completely disregarded biblical history and are therefore being intellectually dishonest. How do you know that the genealogical account from Adam to Noah is untrue? Were you there?
Did you know that there are certain parts of the human skull that never stop growing? Like the brow ridge, for instance. Did you know that if a person lived for 400 years their skull would look just like a Neanderthal skull? Neanderthals are scientific evidence supporting the genealogy in Genesis.
NathanH83 1 year ago
@NathanH83 That is the dumbest theory I have ever heard. Neanderthals bone structure in general was completely different than modern day humans. Pelvic/hip bones, femurs, feet. We evolved from them.
TheHypnoticJerks 1 year ago
You have completely disregarded biblical history and are therefore being intellectually dishonest."
And you are disregaurded Greek and Roman Mythology as history does that make you intellectually dishonest?
"Were you there?"
You don't have to be there to disprove something case in point a murder scene.
"human skull that never stop growing"
No the ears and the nose never stop growing. "look just like a Neanderthal skull?"
No they'd be freaks with massive ears and noses
sweatytoothmadman 1 year ago
@NathanH83
intellectually dishonest? Are you serious? So, you're an idiot if you don't believe in a talking snake, or a guy living to be 900 years old, or a guy coming back from the dead, or a man talking to a cloud?
radioactiveego 11 months ago
@radioactiveego Think about it, logically.
If God is an all powerful God, then He has the power to speak through whatever He wants to speak through.
Therefore, if you say that an All Powerful God is incapable of speaking through a donkey, or a cloud, or a firey bush, then yes, you are being intellectually dishonest.
And since God has this power, then He would be able to delegate this power to angels, like Lucifer, who talked through a snake.
An all powerful God can do this.
NathanH83 11 months ago
@NathanH83
I guess I am intellectually dishonest because I don't believe in a book that is full of nonsense. Actually, this video is nonsense. The comments are nonsense. Your 'dating flaws' are ALL FROM CHRISTIAN SITES. You're a hypocrite. You copy-and-paste things from christian sites.
You made a big mistake in the video description; Kent Hovind is not a doctor. He bought his 'Dr' for $250, and there are recordings of him trying to lie to the feds about property w/ his son. (LOL)
radioactiveego 11 months ago
@radioactiveego Okay, well, may the Lord bless you and reveal Himself to you. He loves you very much and wants you to come to a knowledge of Him.
Pray and ask God to prove Himself to you.
Isaac Newton said, "This most elegant system of the sun planets and comets could not have arisen without the design and dominion of a powerful and intelligent being."
-The Principia, General Scholium, page 940.
Heed the words of Sir Isaac Newton.
NathanH83 11 months ago
@NathanH83
That's nice.
"Millions of innocent men, women and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined and imprisoned; yet we have not advanced one inch towards uniformity."
-Thomas Jefferson, Notes on Virginia, 1782
Heed the words of Thomas Jefferson.
radioactiveego 10 months ago
@radioactiveego Yes, Jefferson was against hypocrisy in the church. So was Jesus.
However, Jefferson used government funds to send missionaries out to evangelize the Native Americans and Christianize them.
So much for "Separation of Church and State."
Jefferson said, "All men are created equal, and are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights."
He said that all men are created by their Creator.
Jefferson even signed his letters "In the Year of our Lord Christ."
NathanH83 10 months ago
@NathanH83
Jefferson was against the church having much influence in the government. They were also against having a state sponsored religion (YA!) Their creator doesn't reference the christian god (period.)
I've written a dozen papers on him and others about their separation of church and state, and Jefferson did not sign the letters 'In the Year of our Lord Christ'. Glenn Beck said that on Fox news which was bogus, and the papers he supposedly wrote that on, already had it at the end.
radioactiveego 10 months ago
@NathanH83 Instead of quote mining say some more of Newton quotations. "The Bible instructs one on how to get to Heaven and NOT HOW THE HEAVENS WORK".
jknengr796 10 months ago
To quote Jaws..."Were going to need a bigger boat" :P
axe863 1 year ago
This must be just about the best parody I`ve ever seen on youtube. Full kudos to Natham!
gliese67 1 year ago
How did the polar bears find their way down to the middle east to join Noah and his Arc?
doctorr2 1 year ago
He basically repeated his argument without any thing to back him up for 9minutes
Triple888DD2 1 year ago
Seriously..why is this guy talking like he knows all this shit is one hundred percent fact? He's just pulling shit out of his ass..
HistorysMysterys 1 year ago
It seems a lot of the "creation-science" that creationist use centers around "Noah's flood". I love how all of their "theories" center around a story that is indistinguishable from mythology. So "Noah" built a vessel smaller than the Titanic which fit a couple thousand people and instead fit around 17 million species of animals, enough food to feed them all, and water for them to drink. Not that it matters since all of the animals would have froze to death as the water was above "the mountains".
jisaid08 1 year ago
This is known as the Flintstones theory
chicagoken 1 year ago
Not sure if troll, but the creator of this video needs to attend his science classes more often. Also, praise Xenu.
lyricalnightmare 1 year ago
if a flood covered the earth a few thousand years ago, how did fresh water fish and other animals that would die in salt water survive? I ate a fresh water trout for dinner a few nights ago and i have the understanding that the animal could not have survived in a world-wide ocean. HELP! Satan is attacking my brain with logic! help me!!!!
doctorr2 1 year ago
@doctorr2 First of all, the oceans are becoming more salty. Which means, logically, that they used to be less salty.
The oceans today are about 3% salt. They could have done that in 5 or 6 thousand years.
In the days of Noah, the oceans would have been mostly freshwater. Which means all the fish would have been freshwater fish originally. They've slowly adapted to the rising salt level.
Scientists have turned freshwater fish into saltwater fish in two weeks by adding salt to the tank.
NathanH83 1 year ago
@NathanH83 Really scientists turned freshwater fish into saftwater fish in two weeks? can you reference that statement? So you believe the oceans were freshwater a few thousand years ago. What's your theory on why they get salty?
doctorr2 1 year ago
@doctorr2 there is no theory as to why they get salty. we know for a fact that they get salty due to rivers carrying with them mineral salts. water and salt flow into the ocean, but only the water evaporates out. salt does not evaporate out of the oceans. this is the same reason why the dead sea is salty and the sea of Galilee is not.
research stickleback fish, and you'll find that they have diverged into two subspecies: saltwater dwellers, and freshwater dwellers.
EvolvingMinds777 1 year ago
@EvolvingMinds777 will researching stickleback fish help me believe that scientists turn freshwater fish into saltwater fish in two weeks by adding salt to the water they were swimming in?
doctorr2 1 year ago
You know that Hovind is a criminal right?
mitch355c10 1 year ago
Why didn't Noah swat those 2 flys when he had the chance?
meldidnot 1 year ago
@meldidnot Noah didn't take insects onto the ark. He took all the animals that have the breath of life in their nostrils. Insects don't have the breath of life in their nostrils. They breath through their skin.
Insects can survive a flood. Go to any place where it's just flooded, when the water runs off, what's the first thing you see? Insects by the zillions.
They take refuge on floating debris, carcasses, or just by burrowing in the mud.
NathanH83 1 year ago
This video is an example of how dangerous religion is to education. Sadly some creationist is going to teach this ridiculous crap to their kids who will grow up thinking the world is 6000 years old and that Noah's ark actually happened. Mythology is no substitute for reality, and science and it never will be.
jisaid08 1 year ago
@jisaid08 I believe that the Bible is reality, just like Isaac Newton did, and just like our president, and past presidents did, including Wasington, Lincoln, Jefferson, Adams, Roosevelt, and many more.
NathanH83 1 year ago
Comment removed
jisaid08 1 year ago
@NathanH83 Isaac Newton also believed in alchemy, and many presidents consult psychics as well. Naming important people who believe in something in no way improves it's validity. You believe the Bible is reality, but that in no way makes it reality. Science can, however, be observed, tested, and analyzed which does make it reality. Science has an track record of producing results which can be quantitatively and qualitatively measured. The Bible is a collection of myths nothing more.
jisaid08 1 year ago
@jisaid08 If you believe in evolution then you believe in alchemy as well. Alchemy is the idea of turning metals into gold. If you believe that all of the elements evolved, then you also believe that it is possible to fuse metals into gold.
NathanH83 1 year ago
@NathanH83 Evolution and alchemy are completely unrelated. Evolution explains the diversity of life on Earth through means of genetic mutation, and the adaptation of species to their environments. Alchemy is the idea that the elements can be changed into gold through some chemical process, which is not true. Elements do not evolve as they are non-living substances made of one type of atom which defines them. Comparing elements to living creatures is absurd and only makes you look foolish.
jisaid08 1 year ago
@jisaid08 Ah, so now you're denying chemical evolution. So you don't believe the table of elements came about through some random process. Neither do I. The elements were created by an intelligent designer. So you see things my way now.
NathanH83 1 year ago
@NathanH83 Chemical evolution and alchemy are not the same thing. Are you actually Kent Hovind? Chemical evolution does happen through atomic fusion in stars. Combining two or more atoms into one to form a new atom with a heavier nucleus does happen. However, that is very different than alchemy which involves mixing chemicals and hoping they'll turn to gold. I seriously doubt I see anything your way sir as you live in some sort of denial from reality where the Bible seems to pervade.
jisaid08 1 year ago
@jisaid08 So, Isaac Newton lived in a denial from reality because he believed the Bible?
NathanH83 1 year ago
@NathanH83 No he didn't because at the time there wasn't a massive amount of evidence that proved the Bible wrong. However, there is now so you are in denial because you refuse to accept the evidence in front of you. Isaac Newton did not have the luxury of modern science so he has an excuse, you do not.
jisaid08 1 year ago
@jisaid08 I don't see a massive amount of evidence proving the bible wrong. I see a massive amount of evidence proving the bible right.
EvolvingMinds777 1 year ago
@EvolvingMinds777 Not really....
HistorysMysterys 1 year ago
@EvolvingMinds777 I wouldn't miss examples of what you're saying for all the tea in China. Please tell me how any of the Bible is proved correct with any sort of evidence anywhere. Give me massive amounts of evidence that any of the stories in the Bible which are impossible by the way happened.
jisaid08 1 year ago
@jisaid08 No reply...interesting...because there is no evidence? The only thing the Bible offers evidence of is that there is a book called "The Bible".
jisaid08 1 year ago
@jisaid08 oops. How any of the Bible is proved correct with evidence? wow! seriously? Have you never read of Matthew Maury?
NathanH83 1 year ago
@NathanH83 Why would I read a book by someone who died in the 19th century and had no access to modern information when I have a wealth of scientific knowledge from the 21st century? Before you say it, yes Darwin lived in that era, and yes he was right. But honestly he was lucky and made keen observations but he didn't understand WHY he was right. It took nearly a 100 years for scientist to prove him correct with genetics. Darwin was a genius and a little lucky. Maury was not.
jisaid08 1 year ago
@jisaid08 Matthew Maury is considered the founder of oceanography, and his book is still taught in universities to this day.
NathanH83 1 year ago
@NathanH83 Ok that's fine. How is it relevant to how the Bible is correct about anything? Is the basis of your argument "smart people have believed in the Bible"? I mean clearly that doesn't "prove the Bible", it simply proves that some people no matter how intelligent they are also hold religious beliefs.
jisaid08 1 year ago
@NathanH83 that doesn't make sense. How can you compare inanimate base elements (which make up living life forms) to evolution, which is the change in animate, living forms made of a multitude of elements ?
Poor argument.
Gromgaw 1 year ago
@Gromgaw you know, one time someone told me that cosmology is not evolution. then I read the dictionary definition of cosmology, and it said "the evolution of the universe"
Obviously there is more than one type of evolution other than macro-evolution. There is cosmic evolution, chemical evolution, organic evolution, micro-evolution, and macro-evolution.
NathanH83 1 year ago
@NathanH83 Cosmology isn't biological evolution, no. Not when we speak of apes and men which is the specific concept that Creationists and Scientists argue about. With a loose translation of the word, every single thing on this earth evolves. Languages evolve, recipes evolve, with new rules and new formats baseball has evolved into the sport it is today. When debating the evolution of man, nothing else is relevant. The evolution of stars has nothing to do with the evolution of man.
thelordmemnoch 1 year ago
@NathanH83 yes but back then they didnt have the scientific knowledge we have today so... irrelevant.
Lachy101 1 year ago
I just watched this and I don't want to be in the middle of any ones argument . I actually found this interesting. Do I agree or not agree? well the video actually sort of makes seance. Why am I in the mood to watch Deerassic Park? I used the video tape for recording a fighting style off from theTV oh well I guess I will have to go rent it
AdamJFleurant 1 year ago
From your description in the video i have a few things to point out. Carbon has a half life of around 5700 years and can only be used to measure rocks and fossils ages up to 50-60,000 years ago so it is pointless to use that as there would be no trace of it left in the fossils. They use Uranium- Lead dating to measure the amount of radioactivity as Uranium- Lead has a half life of around 700 million years giving a more precise representation of the age of the fossil. Thanks for the video :D
TonerBlack1647 1 year ago
The average dinosaur was the size of a chicken. Your wrong!
NikkiLeeSimmons 1 year ago
1:15 "Somebody is serious... WRONG!"
YOOOOOOOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.
DoctorBeardface 1 year ago
1:15
DoctorBeardface 1 year ago
Wow --I actually thought this was an athiest video making fun of creationists until I read your comments. You don't get how silly this is, do you?
portlandjosh 1 year ago
How does it feel to know that anyone who come on to your video is an atheist, or a Christian just looking to reinforce their beliefs, not caring whether or not they are true. As well those on the fence can easily find refutes to these weak arguments that are actually presented with Evidence and reason and not bible quotes and nonsense.
The internet is where religion comes to die, after all most of these videos are down voted like crazy, but "Crazy atheist haters" down rate them, right l o l
lothor1234 1 year ago
Mr. Nathan, I have helped children in poverty, lived a selfless life, loved and respected my neighbors. I have always been honest kind loving and caring. You're suggesting that because I don't believe words written in some random book, the creator of the universe is going to overlook every kind thing I have ever done, and throw me into a lake of fire with people who actually deserve to go (You know rapists child molesters, killers, etc. etc.)?
Depravedmaniac666 1 year ago
@Depravedmaniac666 So you're saying that you want God's stuff, but you don't want Him?
NathanH83 1 year ago
@NathanH83 I never said I wanted god's stuff and what exactly is god's stuff? Are you talking about his jizz or something? Enlighten me please. Also tell me why I deserve to burn in a lake of fire, for being such a decent human being, with all the other child molesters, rapist etc?
"but you don't want him"
Why exactly would I want him? I am not a homosexual for one, and number two is it even possible to fall in love with god? Or am I taking this completely out of context? Enlighten me please.
Depravedmaniac666 1 year ago
@Depravedmaniac666 What exactly is God's stuff? Well, God created air. Do you want to breathe? Or do you want oxygen taken away from you, since you abhor the one who created oxygen.
God created water. Do you want to keep drinking it?
God created plants, including oranges, wheat, corn, potatoes, and every other plant you've ever eaten. Do you want those taken away from you?
God created all the things that your clothes are made of, and your house, and your car.
You want God's stuff, but not Him
NathanH83 1 year ago
@NathanH83 How do you know this?
Depravedmaniac666 1 year ago
@Depravedmaniac666 a building must have a builder. a painting must have a painter. an engine must have an engineer. electric wiring must have an electrician. plumbing must have a plumber. a biologically engineered plant cell must have a biological engineer.
one single plant cell is more complex than the U.S. space shuttle (the shuttle costs 2 billion dollars, by the way). How must more wonderfully complex and costly is the body God provided you?
should the pot deny the potter's existance?
NathanH83 1 year ago
@NathanH83 You're a moron and it's pretty nice of DepravedManiac666 to entertain your nonsense.
You've never ever cracked open a science book, have you? Nor will you coz they're eeeeeevil!
DoctorBeardface 1 year ago
@NathanH83 I've read some of the comments that you have put here and others place. I respectfully ask that you shut up read a book that does not deal with your Sky God before stating idiotic things such as this.
Oh, and a pot is an inanimate object that does not have abilities to think in any way....So, what exactly was your point?
AndreastheRed 1 year ago
@AndreastheRed Am I an idiot because I believe in the Bible? Is that what you're saying?
NathanH83 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Too bad there is NO evidence at all to suggest a world wide flood. Hovind = fail. Pity you haven't learned that by now.
Poeticnuisance 1 year ago
Damn this video is tight! Brother Hovind is right on with this one. Great video. The Bible cannot be refuted. This video clearly shows the wisdom of believers. You can gain knowledge by educating your self, but wisdom only comes from God. Great video once again!
rickztahone 1 year ago
How can people really be stupid enough to believe this crap?
tctheunbeliever 1 year ago
@tctheunbeliever They graduated from Kreationist Playskool.
jdh501 1 year ago
Hahaha "Dr." Kent Hovind, AKA Inmate Number 06452-017.
Leehofooks 1 year ago
and at some point in their eternal growth they change into a different species and never give off springs that would be the regular size of reptiles -.-
awwurdead 1 year ago
did they bring plants too? or did they just let all plant life drown and go extinct?
guaflar 1 year ago
Funny how we never find any dinos associated with Human contexts, or universal flood evidence actually.
falchion49 1 year ago
Pfff Hovind. Automatic disqualification for being a liar.
Eron2828 1 year ago
And here I thought you were making fun of this.
sabertooth1980 1 year ago
@sabertooth1980 I joined YouTube in May, 2010, and the first time I saw this and heard Hovind's voice say, "Gawd created the earth in six days..." I thought this was a parody of creationism and I laughed out loud. Sorry to say, these folks actually believe this pre-school stuff. Sad, huh?
jdh501 1 year ago
@jdh501 Very.
sabertooth1980 1 year ago
4:06 "You dont have to bring the biggest ones you can find" I laughed so hard, its so simple but so true
Kezazah 1 year ago
Here's a question that ends all this shit:
Where the hell is that huge ark? Looks as bigger than titanic, and it never went out to sea again. And nobody's found it.
Conclusion: No ark, no flood, dinsaurs lived millions of years ago, end of story.
Explains how in most science books.
MrPocketWatch1 1 year ago
@MrPocketWatch1The reason why no one has found Noah's Ark is because people are spending tens of thousands of dollars looking in the wrong spot. They're all looking on Mt. Ararat in Turkey.
However, the Bible says that the ark rested on the mountains (plural) of Ararat, which are in Turkey AND in Iran.
According to the biblical evidence presented by Bob Cornuke, it should be in Iran.
If people would do the research before ignorantly wasting their money, we would have found it by now.
NathanH83 1 year ago
@NathanH83 I've been to the mountains of Ararat in Iran, whent around all of them in a few weeks. Found nothing but a few small groups mad people similar to the Taliban.
MrPocketWatch1 1 year ago
@MrPocketWatch1 Well, Bob Cornuke went to the mountains of Ararat in Iran, using the Bible as his map and his guide. And he found what looked like a boat on top of one of the mountains.
Like I said, if people would do their research before ignorantly wasting their money, they would have found it by now.
NathanH83 1 year ago
@NathanH83 Checked that out online and found that Bob Cornuke wasn't convinced that it was Noah's Arc, or if what he found was even petrified wood.
Also learned that associates for Biblical Research produced a 7,800-word paper about problems with his "Noah's arc".
MrPocketWatch1 1 year ago
@MrPocketWatch1 Wow, you can read Wikipedia. Good for you. Too bad you misquoted Wikipedia. Read it again.
It says that Bob Cornuke isn't COMPLETELY convinced that it was Noah's Ark. The truth is, he doesn't know. However, he and the Base Institute believe that what they've found is a candidate for being Noah's Ark. They have 10 significant pieces of evidence suggesting this may in fact be Noah's Ark. But they don't make the claim that they know for sure.
Read what Bob says on his website.
NathanH83 1 year ago
@NathanH83 Was'nt tryin to be specific, it had to fit into a comment for god's sake. Did Bob take any photos of what he found? I couldn't find his website.
MrPocketWatch1 1 year ago
Comment removed
Depravedmaniac666 1 year ago
@NathanH83 Why does this "god" you're talking about create people he knows will go to hell?
Depravedmaniac666 1 year ago
@Depravedmaniac666 I think having anyone answer you questions would be pointless, unless you have honest questions and want to find the truth, if not, I'll just take your username for what it means; Depravedmaniac666. =/
Studd911 1 year ago
@NathanH83 they have found it, its in the mountains OF Ararat, but not ON Mt. Ararat.(30 miles souht of ararat i belive) Technically they have not "confirmed" its the arc because they dont have the permits to excavate yet, but its been measured to accuratly have the same dimesnions as the arc in the bible and 4 differnt types of metal detectors were used on it and confirmed it has a framwork, hull, supports, and all the parts a BOAT would have. also abnormaly large anchor stones found ....
Kezazah 1 year ago
@NathanH83 in the valley of where the arc was.. theese stones are MUCH larger than any average sized anchor stones that were used at the same time period of the arc in the mediteranian. Also, the bible says, the landing point was at Ararat, or close to it. ALSO, on the anchor stones there are 8 crosses, indicating the 8 survivors of the arc (noahs famiily). The arc also sits on sedimentary rock formed by water(the flood) i can link you to the video if you want. Its great and full of evidence.
Kezazah 1 year ago
@NathanH83 Also, the arc is found at 6000+ feet above sea level. How would a boat equal to the size of the titanic get 6000 feet above sea level? UNLESS... 6000 feet WAS sea level, hence the flood... by no means am i attacking you, dont take it as if im coming at you, im just stating the facts for all to see. god bless, i love your videos.
Kezazah 1 year ago
dinosaurs were left off the ark because they were not created by god to begin with, but rather when the fallen angels came and mixed species together to appear as gods to mankind and provoke the anger of the lord. Genesis says "all things had become corrupt" reading the lost books of the bible really pulls things together. a day was a thousand years and a thousand years is as a day. it says that several times yet people still think dinosaurs were able to procreate or grow old in 6 days?
lancelo96 1 year ago
@lancelo96 What lost books are you referring to? Who wrote them?
NathanH83 1 year ago
@NathanH83
google apocrypha & pseudopigrapha for starters...books of adam & eve, books of enoch, jasher, etc etc.
lancelo96 1 year ago
Its funny people actually believe this shit
Leaflessvamped 1 year ago
It was nice to revisit Jurassic Park, but the rest of this video is pure stupidity.
firegod001 1 year ago
There is no proof for anything you say....bible stories....King James 4th wrote the bible, expect him to know anything like that for real? It's fake clearly. Just a little passage on how to get through life easier.
StonesTHATdontROLL 1 year ago
HAAAAHAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAA WOW!!!
KinisonisKing 1 year ago
Where is the talking snake? haha. Some animals evolved... like people, and some people still believe in fairy-tails.
clamcrabber 1 year ago
No flood. Period. Just five minutes of real thinking can show you that a literal reading of Genesis is just BS. It's all in the math.
NorthForkFisherman 1 year ago
What if six days for god is six Billion years for us?
sakrider 1 year ago
Before the Flood!?! What flood?
gregrutz 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
sarah palin is dumb and so are you.
sexym1sterjohn 1 year ago
okay so supposedly god told noah to save the dinosaurs on the ark so that they could just go extinct. sounds like a load of bullshit. it would make more sense if you just threw god and the bible out of the window and embraced science and reason.
MrDougfunny7 1 year ago
this video make cannot be that dumb..No they probly would never get full grown dino's or any other type of animal..most they could bring the babies,or eggs of each kind..Wow i guess if you do not read the Bible..you might actually make a video like this to bash someone lol..They have found Noahs Ark,his village,his home and now Dino's with skin and blood still red blood cells within..Evolution is falling apart like a cheap lie...But atleast they make us laugh lol
BudPeters44 1 year ago
@BudPeters44 What a crock of shit. Gee ya think proof there was an Ark would be a bit more high profile than a creationist on youtube? What is falling apart is that its ok believe a load of dogshit written by goat herders 3000 years ago filled with easily proven falsehoods and lies to support false prophecies. Your religion is based upon things proven wrong years ago but as always Faith Makes you Impervious to Reason. If i had a time machine you STILL wouldnt throw up your idiot bible.
Dhadzinsky 1 year ago
@Dhadzinsky lmao..calm down you little soldier of Satan lol..why in the world are you watching this if you hate the thought God existing ??? are you stupid or what ? lol.I don't get why you seeds of Satan who dont believe in God fight like the devil against him..I mean if he does'nt exist why waist one second of your life fight something that is'nt real ? that huge Oxymoron you know lol.Its like punching at oxygen in the air,you cannot see it but you know it exist.Your a clown lol..,go get'm lol
BudPeters44 1 year ago
@Dhadzinsky by the way,the ark is fact,so is Noahs village,his home and grave sight along with much more..Pull your head from the sand and educate yourself..or stay stupid if you like your choice lol.
BudPeters44 1 year ago