Ron Paul: Huckabee Leaving the Presidential Race Will Help Me

[markv65]

This dumb bitch doesnt even get it look at her stupid face when he says how the executive branch abuses their power! duh!! who let her out of the kitchen?

[2jzdashgte]

Honest question; why is there a lone Canadian flag in the background?

[jacobosmak]

Lots of Herman Coon fans out there. ironically most of them are government bots and fake accounts.

[GreenLantern501]

@NAGGERNUTZ and as for the newsletter who gives a crap? We all know he didn't write it. Why don't you listen to what he has to say now instead of controversy 30 years ago. He's not racist, you'd know that if you actually listen to him talk instead of finding dirt on him and using that as a reason why he's a bad person now. "Excuses, excuses" right back at you buddy. You found 2 things bad about him. Theres about a million things great about him that you should look into.

[vVv11511vVv]

People are not being fooled by this media spin. We are winning!!!! Ron Paul 2012!!!!

[NAGGERNUTZ]

Ron Paul couldn't win if all the GOP runners dropped out of the race. I'm a Huckabee person, but I'll never vote for a man who accepts campaign funds from white supremacist organizations. In '08 Ron Paul accepted money from StormFront*org and David Duke. When asked about it, he admitted it, and refused to give the money back. Then there's the Ron Paul Newsletter fiasco... and he still won't name the ghost writer. He can't control what's written in his newsletter, but he wants to be president?

[GreenLantern501]

@NAGGERNUTZ His reason for not giving the money back was because they would use it for THEIR cause. Ron Paul took their money and used it for HIS cause.They like what he stands for, does NOT mean he likes what they stand for... As for the newsletter yes that was a mistake but that was also like 30 years ago. He has showed that is not how he acts and thinks. You need to lighten up, Ron Paul is the best dam option out there. Only person who can slow/eventually fix our deficit.

[NAGGERNUTZ]

@GreenLantern501 - Um, no... excuses, excuses. When an organization donates money to a candidate, usually it's because they have the same causes and or interests. You just don't donate to someone who doesn't support your views or have like interests. I'm surprised you'd try to use that as an excuse. The newsletter fiasco is a strong reason why those organizations donated to him. The cat was out of the bag. Ron Paul made several racists statements in those newsletters. He read them, he knew.

[NAGGERNUTZ]

@GreenLantern501 - PLUS, Ron Paul raised more money than any other candidate with his money bombs. He raised 6 million dollars in one day. So, did Ron Paul need the money donated by StormFront and David Duke? I seriously doubt it. Also, despite raising more money than any other candidate, Ron Paul finished the '08 campaign with a paltry 4% of the vote. He's just a little too nutty for the average American. He'll get 5% of the vote this year of he's lucky.

[GreenLantern501]

@NAGGERNUTZ What excuse? You're a retard. If he gave the money back then he's really supporting them since they'll use that money for their cause. Yes he raised 6 million dollars that also means he can't screen where the money comes from. He had spent the money already when he found out about the supremacist group's tiny donation. The person with the most money isn't the one who wins. Obama plans on raising a billion dollars, doesn't mean he will have a successful campaign. Stop nitpicking...

[NAGGERNUTZ]

@GreenLantern501 - Unless you're a liberal, please don't call me names. If you can't partake in intelligent debate, say so.

Go to StormFront*org... on the menu bar to the far right, click "search"... on the search screen, type "Ron Paul" as the keyword... answer the security question, and click "search" at the bottom of the screen. See what the white supremacists and StormFront think of Ron Paul.

In a CNN interview, Paul admitted taking the money. The newsletter happened over a period of years.

[Madfoot713]

@NAGGERNUTZ Who gives a fuck what stormfront thinks about anyway?

Small anecdote, a few weeks ago, I made a troll account there and reminded them that white nationalism and libertarianism are completely incompatible, and they should fuck off and stop sending him money if they actually cared about his campaign.. I was summarily laughed at and banned. Real nice guys!

[NAGGERNUTZ]

@Madfoot713 - This is Ron Paul's 3rd campaign and he's never got over 4% of the vote, despite raising more money than anyone else. Look for the same campaign for the 3rd time. Barack Obama simply has to go. Ron Paul will never beat him. We need another black man to beat the dimocrats at their own game. I'm voting for Herman Cain. Herman Cain will split the black and latino vote, capture the independents and have strong republican support. That spells landslide, my friend.

[Madfoot713]

@NAGGERNUTZ Honestly, I'd rather vote for Obama than Cain. Same goes for most of the GOP field.

[clay7760]

you will regret that. obama is the antichrist

[Madfoot713]

@clay7760 lol

[kardentyrell]

@NAGGERNUTZ You gonna vote for a former FED chief? Have you actually heard what Cain wants to do? He uses pretty rhetoric, but if you look for precise things he's planning to do, you won't find any.

[Sigkim]

@NAGGERNUTZ Ron Paul said "he would not give money back to any group that donates to his campaign" He also stated that maybe they would come around to his philosophy of liberty for all so actually their donation is helping Paul spread the message of freedom for all.

This is not verbatim but it is searchable here on youtube so do that if your want his exact reaction to learning of these donations.

[NAGGERNUTZ]

@GreenLantern501 - I guarantee the Obama campaign and the left biased media will attack using this. He's already admitted taking money from those organizations... and... that he read his newsletters. Articles supposedly quoting him directly saying he armed his family because of blacks in his area of Texas... and... that they committed more crimes despite being a minority. Ron Paul will be absolute poison, as the campaign progresses. Besides, he'll only get about 5% of the vote anyway.

[realist283]

@NAGGERNUTZ You're going crazy over such an old subject, I bet obama got tons of donations from crip and blood organizations.. Ron Paul is so consistent that people like you are typically ignored.

[NAGGERNUTZ]

@realist283 - Um, it happened last year. Wait, are you defending him because criminals donate to him? Really? So it's OK that Barack Obama hung out with domestic terrorists because it happened years ago?

You're right about consistency. He's so consistent, he read all of his newsletters. He said so in a CNN interview. This wasn't just 1 or 2 newsletters either. It took place over several years.

[0bamasmama]

Fox news is so sceptic of ron paul, when in reality he is more conservative then them, RON PAUL 2012!!

[LeJimster]

I think he is effecting Martha now, I'm sure I saw a glint in her eye when he was talking ;-). It might be taking a while to wake everyone up, but people are starting to see the big picture and more and more are coming onto Ron Paul's side.

[EMPIRE0FLIES]

Yes I can see huckabee supporters turn towards Dr Paul. Just as most of the US is going towards being fiscally conservative and "voting with their bellies" as Dr Paul has stated. If they hear the original message of Freedom, there is no turning back from the blinders being taken off.

[ForceSmart]

I can't see many Huckabee supporters, both fiscal and social conservatives, going for Paul's social libertarian views. I admire Paul's Pro-Life stance, but many other GOP candidates are too, so IDK about that helping him.

Also, when Paul says no to war w/out a declaration after praising the Constitution, I can't help but think he really doesn't know the Constitution too well. All Congress technically needs to do is appropriate monies for a military action to be constitutional (check & balance).

[GreenLantern501]

@ForceSmart What do you mean he doesn't know the constitution too well? He wrote the thing lol. No really he is the only poltician I'm aware of that has actually read the document... He is a "constitutionalist."

"All Congress technically needs to do is appropriate monies for a military action to be constitutional" They also have to agree on something which is whether or not they do that. So congress decides if we go to war, which would be the declaration of war.

[ForceSmart]

@GreenLantern501 It's a little hard to declare war with a declaration on non-State entities, ie Al-Qaeda, etc...and thankfully, a declaration is not required and our founders and early presidents never enforced what Paul would like to become policy. These early examples of undeclared wars and military actions are notably exampled by the naval Quasi-War under John Adams and the First and Second Barbary Wars under Jefferson and Madison in the early 1800s, in addition to many smaller actions.

[grimakastatik]

F*CK YEA HE TELLS HER HOW IT IS, NOT HOW SHE WANTS TO TELL YOU!