Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (19)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Hi Dan. Why do you call the small metal plates with holes in them inductors ? I thought an inductor was a copper coil ?

  • you might want to go on google vidoes and pop in. "regenerative acceleration" and take a look. lenz law - Reversed! =D

  • Yes I have come across that video before, i believe that is one of Thane C Hanes who has a youtube channel. Also one of the technologies that the Orion project is looking at. Each overuntiy technology will eventually find it's place in the market depending on cost and application.

  • I think the generator design is excilent, but i hope he realises that its ment to be a braking system not a turbo booster! haha. the videos on google explain how it works, the erly idea. on youtube its the later stuff. all the best on your project mate =D

  • Yes you are right, it does have a great deal of magnetic drag, and is not a new idea. I have some people replicating my generator that are not novices. That is about all I can say right now. My generator, has absolutely no detectable magnetic drag and will prove to be a marketable generator. The video on regenerative acceleration was removed, cannot find it. Thanks DQ

  • I know and understand what T C Hanes is doing. He is only cancelling BEMF with asecondary coil. My generator has no magnetic drag at any time. None ZERO. I believe he still has magnetic drag to deal with, unlike my approach which has none, ZERO, at any time. Watch the later videos to see me light up 200+ 20ma nominal rated LEDS very illuminating and watch it speed up under load too.

  • I had a go with your design but on a motor bike Round stator - 18 coils 3 phase and 6 coils on each phase. i think the coils are abit too close but i was generating power 100 an somthing odd mA.. i just couldnt find a way of useing it tho - i tryed a 3 phase rectorfier onto a batt, motor and cap but it seemed to vanish. it does have 18 guage so i think its too big and not enough used to get a decent usable Voltage + amps. orrr im in over my head, which i think its the latter.

  • Hi - i didnt find the link you directed me to, about the large ring magnets you use. also - are they single sided poles? or do they have (N)(s)x2 on one face? of both faces.

  • go to magnet4less com look for ceramic magnets then ring magnets 180mm dia they have only one pole per side

  • Hi, DQ

    Dont waste your time to ignorant people. Anyway pls. try to visit YTB Ismael car or FYMEGM ENERGY extreme electromagnet repelling force. I hope you can use your expertise on how to analyse the in and out or free energy overunity etc...pls tell me what can you say re: Ismael video

  • Ther is no description or clear operating principle that I can find other than using a capacitor to pulse a electromagnet. It probably is an Ed Grey type of motor with back emf recapture.

  • And you are creating a back EMF in each of your 'inductors'. That is why four works better! I got my training on the job. 6 years as a radio repairman in the USAF before college. And then a further 30 years being fascinated with magnets and electricity and constantly manipulating and experimenting with anything unique. My approach is always practical and never 'academic'. Again, I would LOVE to see something unique that defies the laws of physics. This does neither.

  • Wrong again. 4 produce more electricity than 8, because 4 allow more flux to get to the coils. There is no back emf in the inductors as they are always magnetized in the same direction. They turn effortlessly regardless. Your background doesn't mean you are capable of understanding this, since you have everything wrong so far. Just go to my website and open your eyes and remember one thing. I know how this works. YOU DO NOT!! YOU STILL ARE UNDER THE DELUSION THAT YOU KNOW MORE ABOUT THIS THAN ME

  • Then 2 should work better than 4 because then the flux lines will REALLY have a good chance to get to the coils. And zero might work best of all! I suspect that you are not sure how your generator works and are a bit insecure about it. Like a proud pappa with a baby that doesn't seem to develop quite as fast as others. But I don't want to argue with you. I see it is too emotional for you and you are not objective. I do wish you good luck with your project.

  • You are really biased and unable or unwilling to try to understand this invention. I have taken enough of your stupid comments and I have decided that I am going to block you again. You have done nothing but criticize and proclaim that you know more than me about this and this type of physics in general. What arrogance. You seem to be unable to accept that this may be just as I present it, just a proof of principle prototype of a new way to generate electricity. Good bye and good riddance.

  • You continue to address your assessment of my personal perspective indicating a propensity towards telepathy. I ask specific technical questions and you reply like a hurt child. Seriously! I would LOVE to see something like this work. But you have a motor running your generator and lighting an LED. I don't doubt that you are making electricity. I doubt you are making more than you are using. Prove me wrong, don't just read my mind.

  • How did you show anything? Generating electricity, but not using it for anything. It 'repels', but you have to turn it? You showed a couple of volts and 10mA, how is that generating electricity? You need more info to be useful.

  • Go to my website and also view my other newer videos. Are You that ignorant? Or can't you believe that this is a new way to generate electricity? Do you want me to block you again?

  • Block me if you want, but this is the OLD way to make electricity. Nice build, but old technology. And you are not getting more out than you put in. More volts, but not more power. Just the fact that you can switch from volts to amps shows that you don't understand power. A volt meter is wired to a circuit differently than an ammeter. You can't just flip the switch. Don't give up your hobby, but don't reject constructive criticism just because you don't like it.

  • You obviously think this is a simple induction type generator, which shows you have not gone to my website or looked at the other videos. The meter is only hooked up to one coil of 28 gauge wire, 35 ohms, rotating at a very slow rpm, that is why the output is so low. Your so called constructive criticism lacks the constructive part because you have failed to fully investigate this. You seem to possess the typical attitude of an academic, I know it all and therefore there is nothing new to learn.

  • No, not a simple induction generator. You are changing the flux density of the magnet with your rotors so it's an interesting method. I have looked at your stuff and still do not see a revolutionary technique. You add energy and get energy out. But you add more energy than you generate, just like any electric generator. I didn't invent the physics and have NO vested interest in maintaining a status quo. Again, you went to my video and asked me to look at yours. Sorry I didn't swoon.

  • You still don't get it. You must have had your eyes or mind closed The magnets are repelling each other, so that when each inductor blocks one side of a coil or the other, an alternating field, not just a varying field is set up in each coils core. You sure show the historic tendency of academics to reject anything new and try to disinform others and discredit anything that is new. Maybe it's the teacher ego fearing that someone outside of the academic snobverse could be more educated than they?

  • The inductor doesn't block one side or the other. Just the opposite. It alters the permeability of free space which will, in fact, make the magnetic field on that end a bit stronger. It is the changing flux density that creates the electricity. It is the movement of flux lines that creates the current and you are 'moving' the flux lines in a unique way. However, based on your videos, you are not creating much current so I suspect the system is horribly inefficient.

  • You are very wrong The flux lines are diverted because they follow the inductor rather than going through it. You have to try it for yourself with a ring magnet. You haven't taken the time to study it, or you really don't understand how magnetic fields behave. How can you tell me how something works when you don't have the working models to check out? I have three working models and videos of all three. Watch them. I have verified by experiment. This isn't the type of setup that you are thinking

  • True. I have not built one and plan on doing some experimenting on my own this Christmas. And the idea of 'diverting' the field does the opposite of increasing the permeability of free space. But the effect should be the same. Changing flux lines cutting your coils creates your current. How do you avoid eddy currents in the inductors? And I have seen all your videos multiple times. Have you seen mine? Also, I just want this to work! I want it to be unique. I just don't see it... yet.

  • The inductor does divert the flux on one side or the other. That is why 4 works better 8. 4 allow more flux to get through between the inductors and produce more electricity. It needs lower resistance coils. New ones are about 1 ohm each, and will be replaced soon. More current will be produced. I was getting about 50ma from my first proto. An alternating flux is set up in each coil's core, not a varying flux. How can you say you know how something works when you understand so little about it.

  • Oh Dan. You get so angry. Alternating, Varying, it's the same thing. Flux lines build then decay. Pulsed DC or AC. However your technique creates so very little current that you can't even detect the back EMF. Diverting the flux is a very inefficent method. Not complex nor unique. Very simple to understand. Once you create some serious forward EMF you will detect your back EMF. Good luck.

  • And "Block me again?". You posted on my video inviting me to see your amazing invention. I went to your video as a result of YOUR invitation. I gave you an honest appraisal and suggested real things for you to look at. Now you get all huffy because I have questions? Not real science then is it? If you can't take questions from people who know what they are talking about then you will end up blocking a lot of people.

  • Out of 7,000+ video views, you are the only one that I have blocked in the past. It was because of your "I know everything without any need to look at anything more" attitude. But I unblocked you to see If you had learned anything or had bothered to actually learn how this really worked. You haven't changed, I have researched generators for 25+ yaers and spent 2+ on this design, your opinion really doesn't matter to me anyway. You may be a good teacher but you r a very poor student.

  • Have you heard of the"Create the Future Contest"?,you should be able to win the $20k they offer w/ this design.When are we going to see more?

  • I am already in the "NASA TECH BRIEFS-CREATE THE FUTURE CONTEST" IN THE "SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY" CATEGORY, YOU CAN SEE MORE OPERATING DETAILS AT THAT SITE TOO. BE SURE TO CHECK IT OUT. SORRY ABOUT USING ADOBE FILES THERE, SHOULD'A USED JPEG, DQ

  • Amazing,I checked out your website and now see how it works.Brilliant and innovative.I would have never guessed that you were having the magnets REPEL each other!quite unconventional,Bravo, show us more:)

  • Thanks, I hope others go to my website and check out the details of it's operation. this is a very crude version I made and can be improved. I am hoping others make better versions than mine as I don't have a lot of spare time. I will try to add more useful info to my website as time permits. Please if you go to my website, please try to visit my sponsors. Please rate, comment, spread this video. This is a revolutionary type of generator and could solve our energy problem once and for all. DQ

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more