Nice... Lets play 1 on 1 my FTP username is gigdu0471 =D
And yeah
Full Tilt just announced on their FB fansite that a new player should head on over to their web site, then make an account usin the promo code AMERICAS.
Great trick to start with fast easy $ to improve your game with. Make a deposit and they DOUBLE it plus a few other sexy perks. Sucks but its only gonna work for the first 1500 players that sign up using this
Haha.. Ok I am going to hook ya up my FTP ID is millonvan1181 =)
And yep
Ya might have saw people talking all over their FB wall that you could now sign up usin the code AMERICAS at the Full Tilt webpage.
It really is a amazing promo deal. Make a deposit and they DOUBLE it in addition to a few other sexy perks. Sucks but it's only going work for the first 3500 people that create an account usin it
PartyPoker has dropped their bonus release requirements by 75%! Signup and get the normal $500 signup bonus that you get anyway, but if you use the old party bonus code "SIGNUP" you get monthly existing player bonuses, and most get nice cash surprises from time to time if you play at least once a month.
I hate when people call poker gambling as if it was dice or roulette. Theres luck but theres alot of skill at work. Its not different than taking risks in business or sports.
The best continuing successful poker players (pro or "semipro") take the gamble OUT of their game by selecting the right table and even the right seat, trying to (ideally) only play against worse players. There's no "choose your edge" equivalent in the table games -- there's no way a "professional" blackjack or craps player could EXPECT a 20-40% roi consistently, which many online pros CAN indeed expect (especially in poker variants like Razz, where so many simply do not know how to play ;) )
Who do u think would win at a final table if put all these together; Jerry Yang, Jamie Gold, Chris Moneymaker, Greg Raymer, and Steve Dannemann and Jennifer Tilly- all extremely overrated players
Dannemann isn't Harrington -- are you sure you didn't get the 2 mixed up? Cuz I don't know of "two books" written by Dannemann (who is a good player too, don't get me wrong... and he's friends with Matusow, poking fun at Hellmuth on occasion, so bonus points for that :) )
Who do u think would win at a final table if put all these together; Jerry Yang, Jamie Gold, Chris Moneymaker, Greg Raymer, and Steve Dannemann and Jennifer Tilly- all extremely overrated players
let the yanks ban it - british gov. is gonna create a well regulated industry for online poker in UK if so and their fat american raked tax dollars can pay for my currently rubbish train network to be grade A
Those Christians are going to feel mighty silly believing in God their whole lives, and then going "all-in" when they die, only to discover that after death... there is nothing.
But I won't be there to laugh at them, because for us atheists, after death, there is also... nothing.
Read either of the 2 most famous books by literary master Al Alverez... or Positively Fifth Street by Jim McManus You've got it mostly right, but not quite... Poque or Pokah was "French" but a PREDECESSOR to Poker as we now know and love it.
theres an awesome video that tells you how to get 50-100 dollars free on several poker sites.. just search for "free poker bankroll" and it should be at the top. its called "free poker bankroll, no deposit"
The way to legalize online poker, which poker companies to not want to do, is let the government control a type of Excise Tax. The problem with that, is there are no grounds for having the tax, because you do not have to pay dealers, or upkeep for a casino, and the companies know that do not have to do that.
Hey Ennesx, if putting money on uncertainty is gambling, then isn't the stock market or any investing in any business in the world gambling also because you are never certain that you will get your money back. So why don't we ban those also
I should clarify that betting on unknown risk is gambling...you never know with 100% certainty in a hand what cards other players hold. You also have no control over what cards you are dealt. In investing, all relevant information is made available before you make a decision whether or not to assume the risk.
I gamble whenever I step off a sidewalk to cross a road. Life is a gamble. Heck, even fundamentalist Christians who are zealously anti-gambling are themselves taking The Ultimate Gamble, going All In betting their current lives on the hope there is an After-Life. :)
oddly enough, now that I've "discovered" how easy it is to have a HUGE edge in one particular variant -- Razz -- I want to double-amplify my agreement that poker is NOT "gambling", not as much as so much of life... It's more like selective investment, with a long-term expectation of great returns (so long as you don't let your emotions rule -- hey it's just like informed stock market investments, but I doubt CNBC or CNNFN will ever give Poker the same respect as traders and "speculators")
WOW! "in investing, ALL relevant information" eh? How about what the "market" (masses of people, all individuals) will do TOMORROW (or even 2 hours from now).
In poker (esp. "stud" games where you can see the 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 6th card of all of your opponents) u have LOTS of information available to u, and based on that u can determine with mathematically certainty what is the probability of your ROI (return on INVESTMENT). And playing against worse players increases that "certainty" :) .
that's fine. I mean, we already had to pay like 10% in order to get the damn money on the site in the first place, then the site would rake the shit out of it anyway. What's another 5%, just don't take it away all together you fucking government mother fuckers!
if you are not dealing with certainty, you are gambling. even if you are good and assure yourself a statistical advantage over the long run, there is still no guarantee those percentages will materialize for you. the fate of each hand still lies in probability, all poker play is gambling.
winning in poker aint about the "fate of each hand" you monkeyfart, its about playing better than your opponents for a long period. now stfu and quit embarassing yourself asswipe
thats what im saying, you can outplay your opponents over a long period and with bad luck, lose every single hand. When you try to refute the fact that betting on a game of chance is gambling, you make yourself look even dumber than your anme would suggest, "pokerboy"
"the long run is longer than most people think" -- some famous poker guy said this, it's a reminder that VARIANCE is both a good and bad thing (i.e. playing against WORSE players means they chase poorly and suck out more often, but LONG term you win more from them than the solid players who fold when they know they are a 49% dog or worse).
Congress doesn't like internet poker because it's the only thing they can't tax. and their fuming because there's so much lost revenue being lost. How will they fund their war of terror if they
This has been flagged as spam show
Heya, this is an excellent idea, but it is definitely not perfect. What I found that works actually much better is at roulettecash=org.
Taddeo1106 8 months ago
@dalkin1899
Nice... Lets play 1 on 1 my FTP username is gigdu0471 =D
And yeah
Full Tilt just announced on their FB fansite that a new player should head on over to their web site, then make an account usin the promo code AMERICAS.
Great trick to start with fast easy $ to improve your game with. Make a deposit and they DOUBLE it plus a few other sexy perks. Sucks but its only gonna work for the first 1500 players that sign up using this
NegreanuDan87 1 year ago
gold's a fragle he's shit at poker fucking lucked out in wsop the pros own him in cash games.
artysm7 1 year ago
IMO the illuminati suck at poker
ttdantt10384 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@timhold0103
Haha.. Ok I am going to hook ya up my FTP ID is millonvan1181 =)
And yep
Ya might have saw people talking all over their FB wall that you could now sign up usin the code AMERICAS at the Full Tilt webpage.
It really is a amazing promo deal. Make a deposit and they DOUBLE it in addition to a few other sexy perks. Sucks but it's only going work for the first 3500 people that create an account usin it
DanieINegreanu2323 1 year ago
When you sign up fulltilt poker use bonus code POKERDEAL14 and get $600 huge bonus.
aoiferastusafig 1 year ago
right now sign up PKR poker using bonus code DEAL14 and play poker with free $800.
radishreversenct 1 year ago
Get $600 Free at Fulltilt poker When you use Referral code POKERDEAL14
teleprompterfjl 1 year ago
Want to play poker? Get free $500 at Party poker using this bonus code: DEAL500
wingspreadtc 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
$600 Deposit bonus at Full tilt poker, when you sign up with Referral code POKERDEAL14
lombardlaineydk 1 year ago
Jamie gold is a liar i hate jamie gold
Krazyk408 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
$600 Deposit bonus at Full tilt poker, when you sign up with Referral code POKERDEAL14
radishreversenct 1 year ago
Free $600 deposit bonus at pokerstars use marketing code PSP5924
defectirrefutabl 1 year ago
Land of the free? I don't think so.
nkimball24 1 year ago
INNANET
davidwallis85 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Sign up with Pitbull Poker and receive bonus of 200% up to $750 dollars! Just use the bonus code BONUS1500!
aaronzombiefan 2 years ago
the reporter sucks
tryss 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PartyPoker has dropped their bonus release requirements by 75%! Signup and get the normal $500 signup bonus that you get anyway, but if you use the old party bonus code "SIGNUP" you get monthly existing player bonuses, and most get nice cash surprises from time to time if you play at least once a month.
PartyGamingPlc 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Do you play poker or learning to play?
Check out rakebackmonthly. com , the best poker offer.
DotABaoky 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Do you play Poker and realize you been hardly make enough for your expenses ?
Check out rakebackmonthly . com , we have exclusive offer, you get back 30% of the rakes,
all our referred player are making from $1000 to $5000 per month for $1-$2 rake table.
Visit us at rakebackmonthly. com
ifyouwatch3 3 years ago
gold would win for fun, hes accually a much improved player now
rawjc 3 years ago
you can tell from season 3 of High Stakes Poker and season 4. Can really see Golds improvement there.
animeintrostyles 3 years ago 2
Raymer is a donk too. You dont see how he really plays. Just as bad as Jerry Yang.
Richenough2 3 years ago
I hate when people call poker gambling as if it was dice or roulette. Theres luck but theres alot of skill at work. Its not different than taking risks in business or sports.
Nemesis000000 3 years ago 13
The best continuing successful poker players (pro or "semipro") take the gamble OUT of their game by selecting the right table and even the right seat, trying to (ideally) only play against worse players. There's no "choose your edge" equivalent in the table games -- there's no way a "professional" blackjack or craps player could EXPECT a 20-40% roi consistently, which many online pros CAN indeed expect (especially in poker variants like Razz, where so many simply do not know how to play ;) )
simonjeste 3 years ago
Who do u think would win at a final table if put all these together; Jerry Yang, Jamie Gold, Chris Moneymaker, Greg Raymer, and Steve Dannemann and Jennifer Tilly- all extremely overrated players
Richenough2 3 years ago
Dannemann isn't overated donkey, they guy has an amazing resume written two books, get your mind right, Raymer is pretty good as well.
real380 3 years ago
Dannemann isn't Harrington -- are you sure you didn't get the 2 mixed up? Cuz I don't know of "two books" written by Dannemann (who is a good player too, don't get me wrong... and he's friends with Matusow, poking fun at Hellmuth on occasion, so bonus points for that :) )
simonjeste 3 years ago
Raymer would be the favorite. Yang, Gold and Moneymaker have virtually vanished from the face of the earth since luckboxing the main event title.
yulewave 3 years ago
why does chris moneymaker suck at life?
jeff19861118 3 years ago 2
lmao
backlip19 3 years ago
it's all in his book, baby! He's a degenerate gambler!
(Seriously, he is -- I pity his wife and kid(s) -- seems sports betting was (is?) a more common occurence in his life than poker)
simonjeste 3 years ago
Who do u think would win at a final table if put all these together; Jerry Yang, Jamie Gold, Chris Moneymaker, Greg Raymer, and Steve Dannemann and Jennifer Tilly- all extremely overrated players
Richenough2 4 years ago
Yang and Raymer are very tough, especially Raymer. I wouldn't want to take on either of them.
jeffw1267 4 years ago
if u feel that way... then u are a weak player.
Richenough2 4 years ago
jerry yang is such a bad player... raymer is ok
OmerPistone 3 years ago 2
how is raymer overrated, how is tilly overated
tyrone37 3 years ago
how is TILLY over-rated?
"I thought he might have had Kings" -- enough said.
simonjeste 3 years ago 2
sorry, hard to Google the above since I misquoted:
(after she CHECKED IT DOWN ALL THE WAY vs. Patrik Antonius, when her JJ flopped a third Jack, Turn and River were both Kings)
"(sigh of relief) I thought you had pocket kings"
watch?v=iSEqLkeXwm4
(priceless expression on Ivey's face @ 1:49, WOW!)
simonjeste 3 years ago
what the fuck is wrong with ure country?
jon9999zzzz 4 years ago 6
@jon9999zzzz We have this unnerving ability to elect utter morons for office.
lucidmindful 1 year ago
let the yanks ban it - british gov. is gonna create a well regulated industry for online poker in UK if so and their fat american raked tax dollars can pay for my currently rubbish train network to be grade A
ytbma 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Have any of you tried registering at fulltiltpoker com using the GBUTLER1 bonus code? Apparently they give you $ 600!
itsjustme000666000 4 years ago
simonjeste, you are brilliant.
Those Christians are going to feel mighty silly believing in God their whole lives, and then going "all-in" when they die, only to discover that after death... there is nothing.
But I won't be there to laugh at them, because for us atheists, after death, there is also... nothing.
jeffw1267 4 years ago
They are playing so tight it's not wonder they got bluffed by religion.
Poker references ftw.
surGeonGG 4 years ago
Read either of the 2 most famous books by literary master Al Alverez... or Positively Fifth Street by Jim McManus You've got it mostly right, but not quite... Poque or Pokah was "French" but a PREDECESSOR to Poker as we now know and love it.
simonjeste 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
theres an awesome video that tells you how to get 50-100 dollars free on several poker sites.. just search for "free poker bankroll" and it should be at the top. its called "free poker bankroll, no deposit"
zztoad 4 years ago
fuck the government, they fucking sell guns at walmart, and yet we can't gamble online? what a fucked up country.
asong1588 4 years ago
The way to legalize online poker, which poker companies to not want to do, is let the government control a type of Excise Tax. The problem with that, is there are no grounds for having the tax, because you do not have to pay dealers, or upkeep for a casino, and the companies know that do not have to do that.
D34th66 4 years ago
If you are interesting in sports betting check out my videos.
LockSmith4sports 4 years ago
Hey Ennesx, if putting money on uncertainty is gambling, then isn't the stock market or any investing in any business in the world gambling also because you are never certain that you will get your money back. So why don't we ban those also
ammar121088 4 years ago
Because every stock transaction the gov is making money off it. Poker is not...
And the Yanks had to ban poker. The irony of it all...
thebigeasy619 4 years ago
I should clarify that betting on unknown risk is gambling...you never know with 100% certainty in a hand what cards other players hold. You also have no control over what cards you are dealt. In investing, all relevant information is made available before you make a decision whether or not to assume the risk.
EnnesX 4 years ago
I play poker, I gamble. I invest, I gamble.
xvikramx1 4 years ago
I gamble whenever I step off a sidewalk to cross a road. Life is a gamble. Heck, even fundamentalist Christians who are zealously anti-gambling are themselves taking The Ultimate Gamble, going All In betting their current lives on the hope there is an After-Life. :)
simonjeste 4 years ago
haha you're right life is poker
patatepowa 4 years ago
oddly enough, now that I've "discovered" how easy it is to have a HUGE edge in one particular variant -- Razz -- I want to double-amplify my agreement that poker is NOT "gambling", not as much as so much of life... It's more like selective investment, with a long-term expectation of great returns (so long as you don't let your emotions rule -- hey it's just like informed stock market investments, but I doubt CNBC or CNNFN will ever give Poker the same respect as traders and "speculators")
simonjeste 3 years ago
WOW! "in investing, ALL relevant information" eh? How about what the "market" (masses of people, all individuals) will do TOMORROW (or even 2 hours from now).
In poker (esp. "stud" games where you can see the 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 6th card of all of your opponents) u have LOTS of information available to u, and based on that u can determine with mathematically certainty what is the probability of your ROI (return on INVESTMENT). And playing against worse players increases that "certainty" :) .
simonjeste 3 years ago
Think it has more to do with not giving all our money to other countries. They will find a way to make it american and tax the shit out of it.
Flopbuster 5 years ago
that's fine. I mean, we already had to pay like 10% in order to get the damn money on the site in the first place, then the site would rake the shit out of it anyway. What's another 5%, just don't take it away all together you fucking government mother fuckers!
kr4ckas 5 years ago
quit calling poker "gambling" you fuckin republican motherfuckers. not all people "gamble". only bad players do, fuckin ignorfucktards
pokerboy233 5 years ago
if you are not dealing with certainty, you are gambling. even if you are good and assure yourself a statistical advantage over the long run, there is still no guarantee those percentages will materialize for you. the fate of each hand still lies in probability, all poker play is gambling.
EnnesX 5 years ago
winning in poker aint about the "fate of each hand" you monkeyfart, its about playing better than your opponents for a long period. now stfu and quit embarassing yourself asswipe
pokerboy233 5 years ago 2
thats what im saying, you can outplay your opponents over a long period and with bad luck, lose every single hand. When you try to refute the fact that betting on a game of chance is gambling, you make yourself look even dumber than your anme would suggest, "pokerboy"
EnnesX 5 years ago
if there is sumthing wrong with gambling, y are lotteries legal?
dudex1006 4 years ago
"the long run is longer than most people think" -- some famous poker guy said this, it's a reminder that VARIANCE is both a good and bad thing (i.e. playing against WORSE players means they chase poorly and suck out more often, but LONG term you win more from them than the solid players who fold when they know they are a 49% dog or worse).
simonjeste 3 years ago
You're speaking to a poker addict here.
The fact that Jamie Gold won the WSOP proves how wrong your statement is on multiple levels.
Flamesfan7 4 years ago
Congress doesn't like internet poker because it's the only thing they can't tax. and their fuming because there's so much lost revenue being lost. How will they fund their war of terror if they
Malconomics 5 years ago
Jamie Gold is a jew!!! LMAO!!!!
BigNacho 5 years ago
jamie gold sucks
deadflag 5 years ago
obviously there's not enough oil in online poker!!!
SUNDANCE906 5 years ago
Still can't believe america re-voted George White Bush! =)
Aleusi 5 years ago
lol u yanks are nuts anyway, uve got one of the most restricted countries in the world and still harp on about being free
bfyrth 5 years ago
Jamie Gold is a knobjockey....
binksy69 5 years ago
move to europe!
fanatiX123 5 years ago
dumb fuckin republicans
sdnuol 5 years ago
jamie gold can suck deez.
spheenx 5 years ago
The new anti-gambling legislation sucks.
Land of the free? Don't make me laugh.
sworthin 5 years ago