It was a inside job, false flag just like the Gulf of Tonkin incident. I don't see any "holes" in logic, also the stacks of evidence not just this one argument to justify it.
the alleged "progressive" collapse was NOT, it had to be simultaneous failure of a LOT of structure to enable the 2.25 sec of 9.8 m/s^2 descent of WTC7.
HOW do you explain the descent at free fall acceleration, that is 2.25 sec of uniform acceleration of a building that is allegedly "collapsing" because of FIRE? firs of all, the fire(s) could NOT be expected to uniformly heat ALL of the structure that would need to fail simultaneously.
We can only suspect that bombs were in WTC 7 because the fucking Govt cleaned up the site leaving behind no evidence so it is safe to say the NIST report is a conspiracy theory too. They can't prove the building fell from fire just like they can't prove fire and structural damage brought down the Towers. It's funny every WTC building that day was destroyed yet everything around it remained standing. People, you have to wake up and stop thinking these theories are all crazy because they aren't.
Um, yeah, so one guy who believes what his eyes tell him but just because he isn't scientist, now he looks like a moron. Job well done! Just because he was easily dismissed, doesn't mean the bulk of the info is. Many professors of physics, engineering, and design agree. If this is the kind of lackluster journalism Seattle promotes, I for one am grateful that I don't live there.
YouTube 911GATE.
wearechangenj 3 weeks ago
All we hear is the truther being told he's wrong. I want to hear the truther explaining why he's right so he can debunk and embarrass himself.
Please upload the full debate!
911sausageman 2 months ago
It was a inside job, false flag just like the Gulf of Tonkin incident. I don't see any "holes" in logic, also the stacks of evidence not just this one argument to justify it.
JigglesJingle 3 months ago
I can put it in a nutshell for you,
the alleged "progressive" collapse was NOT, it had to be simultaneous failure of a LOT of structure to enable the 2.25 sec of 9.8 m/s^2 descent of WTC7.
HOW do you explain the descent at free fall acceleration, that is 2.25 sec of uniform acceleration of a building that is allegedly "collapsing" because of FIRE? firs of all, the fire(s) could NOT be expected to uniformly heat ALL of the structure that would need to fail simultaneously.
Gaz00ks 3 months ago
We can only suspect that bombs were in WTC 7 because the fucking Govt cleaned up the site leaving behind no evidence so it is safe to say the NIST report is a conspiracy theory too. They can't prove the building fell from fire just like they can't prove fire and structural damage brought down the Towers. It's funny every WTC building that day was destroyed yet everything around it remained standing. People, you have to wake up and stop thinking these theories are all crazy because they aren't.
godzilla618990 3 months ago
Interesting story, but way too little of the debate is included here.
RatatRatR 3 months ago
How about 2 knowledgeable guys debate this. No....that would be crazy and un BIASED.
superbionicbatman 3 months ago
Well that was incredibly boring...
SmalltimR 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
disgusting, thumbs down :)
bawitback 3 months ago
Um, yeah, so one guy who believes what his eyes tell him but just because he isn't scientist, now he looks like a moron. Job well done! Just because he was easily dismissed, doesn't mean the bulk of the info is. Many professors of physics, engineering, and design agree. If this is the kind of lackluster journalism Seattle promotes, I for one am grateful that I don't live there.
slipstrym 3 months ago
Nice summery, any chance of getting the full version uploaded please?
cjnewson88 3 months ago