This isnt identical, but this "invention" has already been in use on most major jet aircraft since the 80's. Its called a thrust reverser. Mostly its used for braking after touchdown.
I have a photo of a helicopter type of craft that uses this same principle for flight, it was built in the late 1950's and uses a turbine with same flight characteristics as a helicopter. The top half looked like a flying saucer and the bottom half looked like a helicopter and at each of the four sides it had the same directional flaps as the Jean Louis Naudin Labs GFS UAV Coander Effect Flying Saucer model. Basically allot of people were experimenting with these type of craft at the end of WW2.
@Nomoreidsleft this is different from Dyson. what I tried to achieve is a thrust reversal. the air is sucked in down through the blue funnel, achieve angular swirl momentum and climbs up out on the circular coanda surface creating very strong lift. this is the principle. it is a very hard thing to see
seems like a pretty sound theory. I wonder how much thrust would be required to create sufficient lift. But what would happen if you placed equally spaced fly wheels within the structure moving with the air flow. Would it create enough of a difference to create a lift with minimum air flow ?
I dont understand you well, but actually no this is way froma sound theory. this is all done by goldshtik, A russian scientist, he died recently and i wanted to take on his results but it didnt work for me. My friend this is not a coanda effect! Here is what is supposed to happen if I remember it all , I gave it all up as it didnt produce results.
1. the air is sucked down through the center
2. the air pushed sideways and up to rotate throgh the lip and back again.
Very interesting.....I think the coanda effect should certainly come into play with this however.....If not then perhaps you should rebuild it making it so the sucked air will take advantage of the coanda effect...it would likely be more efficient....In fact I heard somwhere that a coanda lift style saucer would be more efficent if it sucked instead of blew the air. So I would not give up....It will likely take some mods to make it all work right.
The way you've constructed it there's no way the exhaust air can be sucked back in. The reason is because what you're trying to build, believe it or not, I know what it is, requires unique geometry. There are formulas to calculate that.
If no one has already suggested it, you may be interested in looking at the work of Viktor Schauberger, particularly his 'repulsin'. Once you get past the conspiracy theorists er.. opinions, it is pretty similar.
you are not an invent head, you are an Idiot head, cuz you just showed evidence of your ignorance and lack of any degree of science or intelligence.. unless you are joking
This isnt identical, but this "invention" has already been in use on most major jet aircraft since the 80's. Its called a thrust reverser. Mostly its used for braking after touchdown.
watch?v=sdVFVGom7es
htomerif 3 weeks ago
Who cares about a dyson fan
Jrd8436 3 months ago
That's one fancy vacuum cleaner you got there.
ReneeNme 4 months ago
I have a photo of a helicopter type of craft that uses this same principle for flight, it was built in the late 1950's and uses a turbine with same flight characteristics as a helicopter. The top half looked like a flying saucer and the bottom half looked like a helicopter and at each of the four sides it had the same directional flaps as the Jean Louis Naudin Labs GFS UAV Coander Effect Flying Saucer model. Basically allot of people were experimenting with these type of craft at the end of WW2.
poundherpussy 5 months ago
Did you come up with this first or did Dyson? Did you check out their Dyson bladeless fan?
Nomoreidsleft 8 months ago
@Nomoreidsleft this is different from Dyson. what I tried to achieve is a thrust reversal. the air is sucked in down through the blue funnel, achieve angular swirl momentum and climbs up out on the circular coanda surface creating very strong lift. this is the principle. it is a very hard thing to see
leviterande 8 months ago
@Nomoreidsleft I think the dyson bladeless fan is not a dyson invention but an ion wind fan invented a long time ago.
JaycubL 6 months ago
ok I see how it works now, but how is this ever going to be more efficient than simply a ducted fan blowing straight down on top of a saucer?
DoNotuseEbid 1 year ago
this is a toilet thruster
KOYKKOYK 2 years ago
put some smoke to it so we can see the flow, where it breaks away, and where it's fastest.
nice prototype work, down and dirty.
ucrash2 2 years ago
seems like a pretty sound theory. I wonder how much thrust would be required to create sufficient lift. But what would happen if you placed equally spaced fly wheels within the structure moving with the air flow. Would it create enough of a difference to create a lift with minimum air flow ?
wingnut4427 2 years ago
I dont understand you well, but actually no this is way froma sound theory. this is all done by goldshtik, A russian scientist, he died recently and i wanted to take on his results but it didnt work for me. My friend this is not a coanda effect! Here is what is supposed to happen if I remember it all , I gave it all up as it didnt produce results.
1. the air is sucked down through the center
2. the air pushed sideways and up to rotate throgh the lip and back again.
leviterande 2 years ago
Very interesting.....I think the coanda effect should certainly come into play with this however.....If not then perhaps you should rebuild it making it so the sucked air will take advantage of the coanda effect...it would likely be more efficient....In fact I heard somwhere that a coanda lift style saucer would be more efficent if it sucked instead of blew the air. So I would not give up....It will likely take some mods to make it all work right.
frankensteinmoneymac 2 years ago
this craft will use suction thrust
leviterande 2 years ago
The way you've constructed it there's no way the exhaust air can be sucked back in. The reason is because what you're trying to build, believe it or not, I know what it is, requires unique geometry. There are formulas to calculate that.
ihamoitc2005 2 years ago
If no one has already suggested it, you may be interested in looking at the work of Viktor Schauberger, particularly his 'repulsin'. Once you get past the conspiracy theorists er.. opinions, it is pretty similar.
roper89 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
┫━━ ┃ ━━┣┛ ┣ copy and paste if
┃ ━━━━━ ┃ ┏┳┫┣┳┓this fucker
┗━━┳━┳━━┛ ┃ ┃ wasted 1 minute
━━━━┃ ┃ ┗━┳┳━ of ur life
slave880 2 years ago
you are sooo stupid so sad your mother got you out from hery dirt ass vagina your idiot
leviterande 2 years ago
is that the new 2009 toilet slices dices n chops and u still toilet tissue gee some future
inventhead 2 years ago
you are not an invent head, you are an Idiot head, cuz you just showed evidence of your ignorance and lack of any degree of science or intelligence.. unless you are joking
leviterande 2 years ago
what is this?
kazzannova2008 2 years ago
Dude, yur blender has been smoking too much crack, take the pipe away.....
archimech1138 2 years ago
ahahahahahahaha it just da begining
leviterande 2 years ago
low pressure propulsion
leviterande 3 years ago
And what this supposed to do ?
Piostfelix 3 years ago